Notice: This is a Juremy.com rendered version. Only European Union documents published in the Official Journal of the European Union are deemed authentic. Juremy accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the content of this document.
Base data © European Union, 1998-2024. Postprocessed and marked-up data © 2019-2024 Juremy.com, all rights reserved.
Render version: 0.1, render date: 2024-07-24
Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
ta'l-Unjoni Ewropea
MT
Official Journal
of the European Union
EN
Is-serje L
L series
2024/1689
12.7.2024
2024/1689
12.7.2024
REGOLAMENT (UE) 2024/1689 TAL-PARLAMENT EWROPEW U TAL-KUNSILL
REGULATION (EU) 2024/1689 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
tat-13 ta’ Ġunju 2024
of 13 June 2024
li jistabbilixxi regoli armonizzati dwar l-intelliġenza artifiċjali u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 300/2008, (UE) Nru 167/2013, (UE) Nru 168/2013, (UE) 2018/858, (UE) 2018/1139 u (UE) 2019/2144 u d-Direttivi 2014/90/UE, (UE) 2016/797 u (UE) 2020/1828 (l-Att dwar l-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali)
laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)
(Test b'rilevanza għaż-ŻEE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
IL-PARLAMENT EWROPEW U L-KUNSILL TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Wara li kkunsidraw it-Trattat dwar il-Funzjonament tal-Unjoni Ewropea, u b'mod partikolari l-Artikoli 16 u 114 tiegħu,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 16 and 114 thereof,
Wara li kkunsidraw il-proposta tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Wara li l-abbozz tal-att leġiżlattiv intbagħat lill-parlamenti nazzjonali,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Wara li kkunsidraw l-opinjoni tal-Kumitat Ekonomiku u Soċjali Ewropew (1),
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
Wara li kkunsidraw l-opinjoni tal-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew (2),
Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank (2),
Wara li kkunsidraw l-opinjoni tal-Kumitat tar-Reġjuni (3),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (3),
Filwaqt li jaġixxu f'konformità mal-proċedura leġiżlattiva ordinarja (4),
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (4),
Billi:
Whereas:
(1)
L-għan ta' dan ir-Regolament huwa li jtejjeb il-funzjonament tas-suq intern billi jistabbilixxi qafas legali uniformi b'mod partikolari għall-iżvilupp, l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz u l-użu ta' sistemi ta' intelliġenza artifiċjali (sistemi tal-IA) fl-Unjoni, f'konformità mal-valuri tal-Unjoni, li jippromwovi l-adozzjoni ta' intelliġenza artifiċjali (IA) ċċentrata fuq il-bniedem u affidabbli filwaqt li jiżgura livell għoli ta' protezzjoni tas-saħħa, tas-sikurezza, tad-drittijiet fundamentali kif minquxa fil-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (“il-Karta”), inkluż id-demokrazija, l-istat tad-dritt u l-protezzjoni ambjentali, li jipproteġi kontra l-effetti ta' ħsara tas-sistemi tal-IA fl-Unjoni u li jappoġġa l-innovazzjoni. Dan ir-Regolament jiżgura l-moviment liberu transfruntier tal-oġġetti u s-servizzi bbażati fuq l-IA, u b'hekk jipprevjeni lill-Istati Membri milli jimponu restrizzjonijiet fuq l-iżvilupp, il-kummerċjalizzazzjoni u l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA, sakemm mhumiex awtorizzati b'mod espliċitu b'dan ir-Regolament.
(1)
The purpose of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market by laying down a uniform legal framework in particular for the development, the placing on the market, the putting into service and the use of artificial intelligence systems (AI systems) in the Union, in accordance with Union values, to promote the uptake of human centric and trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) while ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’), including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection, to protect against the harmful effects of AI systems in the Union, and to support innovation. This Regulation ensures the free movement, cross-border, of AI-based goods and services, thus preventing Member States from imposing restrictions on the development, marketing and use of AI systems, unless explicitly authorised by this Regulation.
(2)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament jiġi applikat f'konformità mal-valuri tal-Unjoni kif minquxa fil-Karta li jiffaċilitaw il-protezzjoni tal-persuni fiżiċi, tal-impriżi, tad-demokrazija, tal-istat tad-dritt u tal-protezzjoni ambjentali filwaqt li jagħti spinta lill-innovazzjoni u l-impjiegi u jagħmel lill-Unjoni minn ta' quddiem nett fl-adozzjoni ta' IA affidabbli.
(2)
This Regulation should be applied in accordance with the values of the Union enshrined as in the Charter, facilitating the protection of natural persons, undertakings, democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection, while boosting innovation and employment and making the Union a leader in the uptake of trustworthy AI.
(3)
Is-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu faċilment jiġu implimentati f'varjetà kbira ta' setturi tal-ekonomija u f'ħafna partijiet tas-soċjetà, inkluż b'mod transfruntier, u jistgħu faċilment jiċċirkolaw madwar l-Unjoni. Ċerti Stati Membri diġà esploraw l-adozzjoni ta' regoli nazzjonali biex jiżguraw li l-IA tkun affidabbli u sikura u li tiġi żviluppata u użata f'konformità mal-obbligi tad-drittijiet fundamentali. Regoli nazzjonali diverġenti jistgħu jwasslu għall-frammentazzjoni tas-suq intern u jistgħu jnaqqsu ċ-ċertezza legali tal-operaturi biex jiżviluppaw, jimportaw jew jużaw is-sistemi tal-IA. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jkun żgurat livell konsistenti u għoli ta' protezzjoni madwar l-Unjoni kollha sabiex tinkiseb IA affidabbli, filwaqt li jenħtieġ li jiġu evitati d-diverġenzi li jfixklu ċ-ċirkolazzjoni libera, l-innovazzjoni, l-implimentazzjoni u l-adozzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA u tal-prodotti u tas-servizzi relatati fi ħdan is-suq intern, billi jiġu stabbiliti obbligi uniformi għall-operaturi u tkun żgurata l-protezzjoni uniformi tar-raġunijiet prevalenti ta' interess pubbliku u tad-drittijiet tal-persuni fis-suq intern kollu abbażi tal-Artikolu 114 tat-Trattat dwar il-Funzjonament tal-Unjoni Ewropea (TFUE). Peress li dan ir-Regolament fih regoli speċifiċi dwar il-protezzjoni tal-individwi fir-rigward tal-ipproċessar tad-data personali rigward restrizzjonijiet tal-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota għall-fini tal-infurzar tal-liġi, għall-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA għall-valutazzjonijiet tar-riskju ta' persuni fiżiċi għall-fini tal-infurzar tal-liġi u għall-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, huwa xieraq li dan ir-Regolament, sa fejn huma kkonċernati dawk ir-regoli speċifiċi, jiġi bbażat fuq l-Artikolu 16 TFUE. Fid-dawl ta' dawk ir-regoli speċifiċi u r-rikors għall-Artikolu 16 TFUE, jixraq jiġi kkonsultat il-Bord Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data.
(3)
AI systems can be easily deployed in a large variety of sectors of the economy and many parts of society, including across borders, and can easily circulate throughout the Union. Certain Member States have already explored the adoption of national rules to ensure that AI is trustworthy and safe and is developed and used in accordance with fundamental rights obligations. Diverging national rules may lead to the fragmentation of the internal market and may decrease legal certainty for operators that develop, import or use AI systems. A consistent and high level of protection throughout the Union should therefore be ensured in order to achieve trustworthy AI, while divergences hampering the free circulation, innovation, deployment and the uptake of AI systems and related products and services within the internal market should be prevented by laying down uniform obligations for operators and guaranteeing the uniform protection of overriding reasons of public interest and of rights of persons throughout the internal market on the basis of Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). To the extent that this Regulation contains specific rules on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data concerning restrictions of the use of AI systems for remote biometric identification for the purpose of law enforcement, of the use of AI systems for risk assessments of natural persons for the purpose of law enforcement and of the use of AI systems of biometric categorisation for the purpose of law enforcement, it is appropriate to base this Regulation, in so far as those specific rules are concerned, on Article 16 TFEU. In light of those specific rules and the recourse to Article 16 TFEU, it is appropriate to consult the European Data Protection Board.
(4)
L-IA hi familja ta' teknoloġiji li qed tevolvi malajr u li tikkontribwixxi għal firxa wiesgħa ta' benefiċċji ekonomiċi, ambjentali u soċjetali fl-ispettru kollu tal-industriji u tal-attivitajiet soċjali. B'titjib fil-previżjoni, b'ottimizzazzjoni tal-operazzjonijiet u l-allokazzjoni tar-riżorsi, u b'personalizzazzjoni tas-soluzzjonijiet diġitali disponibbli għall-individwi u l-organizzazzjonijiet, l-użu tal-IA jista' jipprovdi vantaġġi kompetittivi ewlenin lill-impriżi u jappoġġa eżiti b'benefiċċji soċjali u ambjentali, bħal pereżempju fil-kura tas-saħħa, fl-agrikoltura, fis-sikurezza tal-ikel, fl-edukazzjoni u t-taħriġ, fil-media, fl-isports, fil-kultura, fil-ġestjoni tal-infrastruttura, fl-enerġija, fit-trasport u l-loġistika, fis-servizzi pubbliċi, fis-sigurtà, fil-ġustizzja, fl-effiċjenza tar-riżorsi u enerġetika, fil-monitoraġġ ambjentali, fil-konservazzjoni u r-restawr tal-bijodiversità u l-ekosistemi u fil-mitigazzjoni u l-adattament għat-tibdil fil-klima.
(4)
AI is a fast evolving family of technologies that contributes to a wide array of economic, environmental and societal benefits across the entire spectrum of industries and social activities. By improving prediction, optimising operations and resource allocation, and personalising digital solutions available for individuals and organisations, the use of AI can provide key competitive advantages to undertakings and support socially and environmentally beneficial outcomes, for example in healthcare, agriculture, food safety, education and training, media, sports, culture, infrastructure management, energy, transport and logistics, public services, security, justice, resource and energy efficiency, environmental monitoring, the conservation and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems and climate change mitigation and adaptation.
(5)
Fl-istess ħin, skont iċ-ċirkostanzi fir-rigward tal-applikazzjoni, l-użu u l-livell ta' żvilupp teknoloġiku speċifiċi tagħha, l-IA tista' toħloq riskji u tikkawża ħsara lill-interessi pubbliċi u lid-drittijiet fundamentali li huma protetti bil-liġi tal-Unjoni. Din il-ħsara tista' tkun materjali jew mhux materjali, inkluż ħsara fiżika, psikoloġika, soċjetali jew ekonomika.
(5)
At the same time, depending on the circumstances regarding its specific application, use, and level of technological development, AI may generate risks and cause harm to public interests and fundamental rights that are protected by Union law. Such harm might be material or immaterial, including physical, psychological, societal or economic harm.
(6)
Minħabba l-impatt kbir li jista' jkollha l-IA fuq is-soċjetà u l-ħtieġa li tinbena l-fiduċja, huwa essenzjali li l-IA u l-qafas regolatorju tagħha jiġu żviluppati f'konformità mal-valuri tal-Unjoni minquxa fl-Artikolu 2 tat-Trattat dwar l-Unjoni Ewropea (TUE), id-drittijiet u l-libertajiet fundamentali minquxa fit-Trattati u, skont l-Artikolu 6 TUE, fil-Karta. Bħala prerekwiżit, jenħtieġ li l-IA tkun teknoloġija ċċentrata fuq il-bniedem. Jenħtieġ li sservi bħala għodda għan-nies, bl-għan aħħari li jiżdied il-benesseri tal-bniedem.
(6)
Given the major impact that AI can have on society and the need to build trust, it is vital for AI and its regulatory framework to be developed in accordance with Union values as enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined in the Treaties and, pursuant to Article 6 TEU, the Charter. As a prerequisite, AI should be a human-centric technology. It should serve as a tool for people, with the ultimate aim of increasing human well-being.
(7)
Biex ikun żgurat livell konsistenti u għoli ta' protezzjoni tal-interessi pubbliċi fir-rigward tas-saħħa, is-sikurezza, u d-drittijiet fundamentali, jenħtieġ li jiġu stabbiliti regoli komuni għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li dawk ir-regoli jkunu konsistenti mal-Karta, nondiskriminatorji u konformi mal-impenji kummerċjali internazzjonali tal-Unjoni. Jenħtieġ li jqisu wkoll id-Dikjarazzjoni Ewropea dwar id-Drittijiet u l-Prinċipji Diġitali għad-Deċennju Diġitali u l-Linji Gwida dwar l-Etika għal IA affidabbli tal-Grupp ta' Esperti ta' Livell Għoli dwar l-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali (AI HLEG).
(7)
In order to ensure a consistent and high level of protection of public interests as regards health, safety and fundamental rights, common rules for high-risk AI systems should be established. Those rules should be consistent with the Charter, non-discriminatory and in line with the Union’s international trade commitments. They should also take into account the European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade and the Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI of the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG).
(8)
Għalhekk, huwa meħtieġ qafas legali tal-Unjoni li jistabbilixxi regoli armonizzati dwar l-IA biex jitrawmu l-iżvilupp, l-użu u l-adozzjoni tal-IA fis-suq intern li fl-istess ħin jissodisfa livell għoli ta' protezzjoni tal-interessi pubbliċi, bħas-saħħa u s-sikurezza, u l-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet fundamentali, inkluż id-demokrazija, l-istat tad-dritt u l-protezzjoni ambjentali kif rikonoxxuti u mħarsa bil-liġi tal-Unjoni. Biex jintlaħaq dak l-objettiv, jenħtieġ jiġu stabbiliti regoli li jirregolaw l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz u l-użu ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA, u b'hekk ikun żgurat il-funzjonament bla xkiel tas-suq intern u dawk is-sistemi jkunu jistgħu jibbenefikaw mill-prinċipju tal-moviment liberu tal-prodotti u tas-servizzi. Jenħtieġ li dawk ir-regoli jkunu ċari u robusti fil-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet fundamentali, jappoġġaw soluzzjonijiet innovattivi ġodda, li jippermettu ekosistema Ewropea ta' atturi pubbliċi u privati li joħolqu sistemi tal-IA f'konformità mal-valuri tal-Unjoni u jisfruttaw il-potenzjal tat-trasformazzjoni diġitali fir-reġjuni kollha tal-Unjoni. Billi jistabbilixxi dawk ir-regoli kif ukoll miżuri b'appoġġ għall-innovazzjoni b'enfasi partikolari fuq l-intrapriżi mikro, żgħar u ta' daqs medju (SMEs), inkluż negozji ġodda, dan ir-Regolament jappoġġa l-objettiv li jiġi promoss l-approċċ Ewropew iċċentrat fuq il-bniedem għall-IA u li jkun mexxej globali fl-iżvilupp ta' IA sigura, affidabbli u etika kif iddikjarat mill-Kunsill Ewropew (5), u jiżgura l-protezzjoni tal-prinċipji etiċi, kif mitlub speċifikament mill-Parlament Ewropew (6).
(8)
A Union legal framework laying down harmonised rules on AI is therefore needed to foster the development, use and uptake of AI in the internal market that at the same time meets a high level of protection of public interests, such as health and safety and the protection of fundamental rights, including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection as recognised and protected by Union law. To achieve that objective, rules regulating the placing on the market, the putting into service and the use of certain AI systems should be laid down, thus ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and allowing those systems to benefit from the principle of free movement of goods and services. Those rules should be clear and robust in protecting fundamental rights, supportive of new innovative solutions, enabling a European ecosystem of public and private actors creating AI systems in line with Union values and unlocking the potential of the digital transformation across all regions of the Union. By laying down those rules as well as measures in support of innovation with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises (SMEs), including startups, this Regulation supports the objective of promoting the European human-centric approach to AI and being a global leader in the development of secure, trustworthy and ethical AI as stated by the European Council (5), and it ensures the protection of ethical principles, as specifically requested by the European Parliament (6).
(9)
Jenħtieġ li jiġu stabbiliti regoli armonizzati applikabbli għall-introduzzjoni fis-suq, għat-tqegħid fis-servizz u għall-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli b'mod konsistenti mar-Regolament (KE) Nru 765/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (7), mad-Deċiżjoni Nru 768/2008/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (8) u mar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (9) (il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid). Jenħtieġ li r-regoli armonizzati stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament japplikaw fis-setturi kollha u, f'konformità mal-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid, jenħtieġ li jkunu mingħajr preġudizzju għal-liġijiet eżistenti tal-Unjoni, b'mod partikolari dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data, il-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur, id-drittijiet fundamentali, l-impjiegi, il-protezzjoni tal-ħaddiema u s-sikurezza tal-prodotti, li dan ir-Regolament huwa komplementari għalihom. B'konsegwenza ta' dan, id-drittijiet u r-rimedji kollha previsti minn tali liġijiet tal-Unjoni għall-konsumaturi, u persuni oħra li fuqhom is-sistemi tal-IA jista' jkollhom impatt negattiv, inkluż fir-rigward tal-kumpens għal danni possibbli skont id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 85/374/KEE (10) jibqgħu mhux affettwati u applikabbli bis-sħiħ. Barra minn hekk, fil-kuntest tal-impjiegi u l-protezzjoni tal-ħaddiema, jenħtieġ għalhekk li dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwax il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-politika soċjali u l-liġi nazzjonali tax-xogħol, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, fir-rigward tal-kundizzjonijiet tal-impjieg u tax-xogħol, inkluż is-saħħa u s-sikurezza fuq il-post tax-xogħol u r-relazzjoni bejn l-impjegaturi u l-ħaddiema. Jenħtieġ ukoll li dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwax l-eżerċizzju tad-drittijiet fundamentali kif rikonoxxuti fl-Istati Membri u fil-livell tal-Unjoni, inkluż id-dritt jew il-libertà tal-istrajkjar jew li tittieħed azzjoni oħra koperta mis-sistemi speċifiċi ta' relazzjonijiet industrijali fl-Istati Membri kif ukoll id-dritt tan-negozjar, il-konklużjoni u l-infurzar ta' ftehimiet kollettivi jew id-dritt li tittieħed azzjoni kollettiva f'konformità mad-dritt nazzjonali. Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwax id-dispożizzjonijiet li għandhom l-għan li jtejbu l-kundizzjonijiet tax-xogħol fix-xogħol fuq il-pjattaformi stabbiliti f’ Direttiva tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar it-titjib tal-kundizzjonijiet tax-xogħol fix-xogħol fuq il-pjattaformi. Barra minn hekk, dan ir-Regolament għandu l-għan li jsaħħaħ l-effettività ta' dawk id-drittijiet u r-rimedji eżistenti billi jistabbilixxi rekwiżiti u obbligi speċifiċi, inkluż fir-rigward tat-trasparenza, id-dokumentazzjoni teknika u ż-żamma tar-rekords tas-sistemi tal-IA. Jenħtieġ ukoll li l-obbligi imposti fuq diversi operaturi involuti fil-katina tal-valur tal-IA skont dan ir-Regolament japplikaw mingħajr preġudizzju għal-liġi nazzjonali, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, bl-effett li jillimitaw l-użu ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA meta tali liġi taqa' barra mill-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament jew tipprova tilħaq objettivi leġittimi ta' interess pubbliku għajr dawk segwiti minn dan ir-Regolament. Pereżempju, jenħtieġ li l-liġi nazzjonali tax-xogħol u l-liġi dwar il-protezzjoni tal-minorenni, jiġifieri persuni taħt l-età ta' 18-il sena, b'kont meħud tal-Kumment Ġenerali Nru 25 (2021) tal-UNCRC (Konvenzjoni tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti dwar id-Drittijiet tat-Tfal) dwar id-drittijiet tat-tfal fir-rigward tal-ambjent diġitali, sakemm ma jkunux speċifiċi għas-sistemi tal-IA u jippruvaw jilħqu objettivi leġittimi oħra ta' interess pubbliku, ma jiġux affettwati minn dan ir-Regolament.
(9)
Harmonised rules applicable to the placing on the market, the putting into service and the use of high-risk AI systems should be laid down consistently with Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7), Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (8) and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) (New Legislative Framework). The harmonised rules laid down in this Regulation should apply across sectors and, in line with the New Legislative Framework, should be without prejudice to existing Union law, in particular on data protection, consumer protection, fundamental rights, employment, and protection of workers, and product safety, to which this Regulation is complementary. As a consequence, all rights and remedies provided for by such Union law to consumers, and other persons on whom AI systems may have a negative impact, including as regards the compensation of possible damages pursuant to Council Directive 85/374/EEC (10) remain unaffected and fully applicable. Furthermore, in the context of employment and protection of workers, this Regulation should therefore not affect Union law on social policy and national labour law, in compliance with Union law, concerning employment and working conditions, including health and safety at work and the relationship between employers and workers. This Regulation should also not affect the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in the Member States and at Union level, including the right or freedom to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States as well as the right to negotiate, to conclude and enforce collective agreements or to take collective action in accordance with national law. This Regulation should not affect the provisions aiming to improve working conditions in platform work laid down in a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work. Moreover, this Regulation aims to strengthen the effectiveness of such existing rights and remedies by establishing specific requirements and obligations, including in respect of the transparency, technical documentation and record-keeping of AI systems. Furthermore, the obligations placed on various operators involved in the AI value chain under this Regulation should apply without prejudice to national law, in compliance with Union law, having the effect of limiting the use of certain AI systems where such law falls outside the scope of this Regulation or pursues legitimate public interest objectives other than those pursued by this Regulation. For example, national labour law and law on the protection of minors, namely persons below the age of 18, taking into account the UNCRC General Comment No 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment, insofar as they are not specific to AI systems and pursue other legitimate public interest objectives, should not be affected by this Regulation.
(10)
Id-dritt fundamentali għall-protezzjoni tad-data personali huwa salvagwardjat b'mod partikolari mir-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 (11) u (UE) 2018/1725 (12) tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (13). Barra minn hekk, id-Direttiva 2002/58/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (14) tipproteġi l-ħajja privata u l-kunfidenzjalità tal-komunikazzjoni, inkluż billi tipprovdi kundizzjonijiet għal kwalunkwe ħżin ta' data personali u mhux personali u l-aċċess fi u minn tagħmir terminali. Dawk l-atti legali tal-Unjoni jipprovdu l-bażi għall-ipproċessar tad-data sostenibbli u responsabbli, inkluż fejn is-settijiet ta' data jinkludu taħlita ta' data personali u mhux personali. Dan ir-Regolament ma għandux l-għan li jaffettwa l-applikazzjoni tal-liġijiet eżistenti tal-Unjoni li jirregolaw l-ipproċessar tad-data personali, inkluż il-kompiti u s-setgħat tal-awtoritajiet superviżorji indipendenti kompetenti biex jimmonitorjaw il-konformità ma' dawk l-istrumenti. Lanqas ma jaffettwa l-obbligi tal-fornituri u tal-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA fir-rwol tagħhom bħala kontrolluri jew proċessuri tad-data li jirriżultaw mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali sa fejn it-tfassil, l-iżvilupp jew l-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA jinvolvu l-ipproċessar ta' data personali. Huwa xieraq ukoll li jiġi ċċarat li s-suġġetti tad-data jkomplu jgawdu d-drittijiet u l-garanziji kollha mogħtija lilhom minn tali liġi tal-Unjoni, inkluż id-drittijiet relatati mat-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet individwali awtomatizzati biss, inkluż it-tfassil tal-profili. Jenħtieġ li r-regoli armonizzati għall-introduzzjoni fis-suq, għat-tqegħid fis-servizz u għall-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA stabbiliti skont dan ir-Regolament jiffaċilitaw l-implimentazzjoni effettiva u jippermettu l-eżerċizzju tad-drittijiet tas-suġġetti tad-data u rimedji oħra garantiti skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali u ta' drittijiet fundamentali oħra.
(10)
The fundamental right to the protection of personal data is safeguarded in particular by Regulations (EU) 2016/679 (11) and (EU) 2018/1725 (12) of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council (13). Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (14) additionally protects private life and the confidentiality of communications, including by way of providing conditions for any storing of personal and non-personal data in, and access from, terminal equipment. Those Union legal acts provide the basis for sustainable and responsible data processing, including where data sets include a mix of personal and non-personal data. This Regulation does not seek to affect the application of existing Union law governing the processing of personal data, including the tasks and powers of the independent supervisory authorities competent to monitor compliance with those instruments. It also does not affect the obligations of providers and deployers of AI systems in their role as data controllers or processors stemming from Union or national law on the protection of personal data in so far as the design, the development or the use of AI systems involves the processing of personal data. It is also appropriate to clarify that data subjects continue to enjoy all the rights and guarantees awarded to them by such Union law, including the rights related to solely automated individual decision-making, including profiling. Harmonised rules for the placing on the market, the putting into service and the use of AI systems established under this Regulation should facilitate the effective implementation and enable the exercise of the data subjects’ rights and other remedies guaranteed under Union law on the protection of personal data and of other fundamental rights.
(11)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament ikun mingħajr preġudizzju għad-dispożizzjonijiet dwar ir-responsabbiltà tal-fornituri ta’ servizzi intermedjarji kif stipulat fir-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (15).
(11)
This Regulation should be without prejudice to the provisions regarding the liability of providers of intermediary services as set out in Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (15).
(12)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “sistema tal-IA” f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi ddefinit b'mod ċar u jenħtieġ li jiġi allinjat mill-qrib mal-ħidma tal-organizzazzjonijiet internazzjonali li jaħdmu fuq l-IA biex tiġi żgurata ċ-ċertezza legali, tiġi ffaċilitata l-konverġenza internazzjonali u l-aċċettazzjoni wiesgħa, filwaqt li tingħata l-flessibbiltà biex jiġu akkomodati l-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi rapidi f'dan il-qasam. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li d-definizzjoni tkun ibbażata fuq karatteristiċi ewlenin tas-sistemi tal-IA li jiddistingwuh minn sistemi ta' software tjew approċċi ta' programmazzjoni tradizzjonali aktar sempliċi u jenħtieġ li ma jkoprix sistemi li huma bbażati fuq ir-regoli definiti biss minn persuni fiżiċi biex iwettqu operazzjonijiet b'mod awtomatiku. Karatteristika ewlenija tas-sistemi tal-IA hija l-kapaċità tagħhom li jinferixxu. Din il-kapaċità li jinferixxu tirreferi għall-proċess tal-kisba tal-outputs, bħal previżjonijiet, kontenut, rakkomandazzjonijiet, jew deċiżjonijiet, li jistgħu jinfluwenzaw l-ambjenti fiżiċi u virtwali u għal kapaċità tas-sistemi tal-IA li jidderivaw mudelli jew algoritmi, jew it-tnejn, minn inputs jew data. It-tekniki li jippermettu inferenza waqt li tinbena sistema tal-IA jinkludu approċċi ta' tagħlim awtomatiku li jitgħallmu mid-data dwar kif jistgħu jintlaħqu ċerti objettivi, u approċċi bbażati fuq il-loġika u l-għarfien li jinferixxu minn għarfien ikkodifikat jew rappreżentazzjoni simbolika tal-kompitu li għandu jiġi solvut. Il-kapaċità ta' sistema tal-IA li tinferixxi tmur lil hinn mill-ipproċessar bażiku tad-data billi tippermetti l-apprendiment, ir-raġunament jew l-immudellar. It-terminu “bbażati fuq il-magni” jirreferi għall-fatt li s-sistemi tal-IA jaħdmu bil-magni. Ir-referenza għal objettivi espliċiti jew impliċiti tenfasizza li s-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu joperaw skont objettivi espliċiti definiti jew skont objettivi impliċiti. L-objettivi tas-sistema tal-IA jistgħu jkunu differenti mill-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA f'kuntest speċifiku. Għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-ambjenti jinftiehmu bħala l-kuntesti li fihom joperaw is-sistemi tal-IA, filwaqt li l-outputs iġġenerati mis-sistema tal-IA jirriflettu funzjonijiet differenti mwettqa mis-sistemi tal-IA u jinkludu previżjonijiet, kontenut, rakkomandazzjonijiet jew deċiżjonijiet. Is-sistemi tal-IA huma ddisinjati biex joperaw b'livelli varji ta' awtonomija, li jfisser li għandhom ċertu livell ta' indipendenza tal-azzjonijiet mill-involviment tal-bniedem u ta' kapaċitajiet biex joperaw mingħajr intervent mill-bniedem. L-adattabbiltà li sistema tal-IA tista' turi wara l-implimentazzjoni tirreferi għall-kapaċitajiet ta' awtotagħlim, li jippermettu li s-sistema tinbidel waqt li tkun qed tintuża. Is-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jintużaw b'mod awtonomu jew bħala komponent ta' prodott, irrispettivament minn jekk is-sistema tkunx integrata fiżikament fil-prodott (inkorporata) jew taqdix il-funzjonalità tal-prodott mingħajr ma tkun integrata fih (mhux inkorporata).
(12)
The notion of ‘AI system’ in this Regulation should be clearly defined and should be closely aligned with the work of international organisations working on AI to ensure legal certainty, facilitate international convergence and wide acceptance, while providing the flexibility to accommodate the rapid technological developments in this field. Moreover, the definition should be based on key characteristics of AI systems that distinguish it from simpler traditional software systems or programming approaches and should not cover systems that are based on the rules defined solely by natural persons to automatically execute operations. A key characteristic of AI systems is their capability to infer. This capability to infer refers to the process of obtaining the outputs, such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions, which can influence physical and virtual environments, and to a capability of AI systems to derive models or algorithms, or both, from inputs or data. The techniques that enable inference while building an AI system include machine learning approaches that learn from data how to achieve certain objectives, and logic- and knowledge-based approaches that infer from encoded knowledge or symbolic representation of the task to be solved. The capacity of an AI system to infer transcends basic data processing by enabling learning, reasoning or modelling. The term ‘machine-based’ refers to the fact that AI systems run on machines. The reference to explicit or implicit objectives underscores that AI systems can operate according to explicit defined objectives or to implicit objectives. The objectives of the AI system may be different from the intended purpose of the AI system in a specific context. For the purposes of this Regulation, environments should be understood to be the contexts in which the AI systems operate, whereas outputs generated by the AI system reflect different functions performed by AI systems and include predictions, content, recommendations or decisions. AI systems are designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy, meaning that they have some degree of independence of actions from human involvement and of capabilities to operate without human intervention. The adaptiveness that an AI system could exhibit after deployment, refers to self-learning capabilities, allowing the system to change while in use. AI systems can be used on a stand-alone basis or as a component of a product, irrespective of whether the system is physically integrated into the product (embedded) or serves the functionality of the product without being integrated therein (non-embedded).
(13)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “implimentatur” imsemmi f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi interpretat bħala kwalunkwe persuna fiżika jew ġuridika, inkluż awtorità pubblika, aġenzija jew korp ieħor, li tuża sistema tal-IA li taħt l-awtorità tagħha, ħlief meta s-sistema tal-IA tintuża matul attività personali mhux professjonali. Skont it-tip ta' sistema tal-IA, l-użu tas-sistema jista' jaffettwa persuni oħra minbarra l-implimentatur.
(13)
The notion of ‘deployer’ referred to in this Regulation should be interpreted as any natural or legal person, including a public authority, agency or other body, using an AI system under its authority, except where the AI system is used in the course of a personal non-professional activity. Depending on the type of AI system, the use of the system may affect persons other than the deployer.
(14)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “data bijometrika” użat f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi interpretat fid-dawl tal-kunċett ta' data bijometrika kif definit fl-Artikolu 4, il-punt (14) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, l-Artikolu 3, il-punt (18) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725 u l-Artikolu 3, il-punt (13) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. Id-data bijometrika tista' tippermetti l-awtentikazzjoni, l-identifikazzjoni jew il-kategorizzazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi u r-rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet ta' persuni fiżiċi.
(14)
The notion of ‘biometric data’ used in this Regulation should be interpreted in light of the notion of biometric data as defined in Article 4, point (14) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Article 3, point (18) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and Article 3, point (13) of Directive (EU) 2016/680. Biometric data can allow for the authentication, identification or categorisation of natural persons and for the recognition of emotions of natural persons.
(15)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “identifikazzjoni bijometrika” imsemmi f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi ddefinit bħala r-rikonoxximent awtomatizzat ta' karatteristiċi fiżiċi, fiżjoloġiċi u ta' mġiba tal-bniedem bħall-wiċċ, il-moviment tal-għajnejn, il-forma tal-ġisem, il-vuċi, il-prosodija, il-mixja, il-qagħda, ir-rata tal-qalb, il-pressjoni tad-demm, ir-riħa, karatteristiċi tal-ittastjar, għall-fini li tiġi stabbilita l-identità ta' individwu billi titqabbel id-data bijometrika ta' dak l-individwu mad-data bijometrika ta' individwi maħżuna f'bażi ta' data ta' referenza, irrispettivament minn jekk l-individwu jkunx ta l-kunsens tiegħu jew le. Dan jeskludi sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-verifika bijometrika, li tinkludi l-awtentikazzjoni, li l-iskop uniku tagħha huwa li tikkonferma li persuna fiżika speċifika hija l-persuna li tiddikjara li hija u li tikkonferma l-identità ta' persuna fiżika għall-iskop uniku li jkollha aċċess għal servizz, li tiftaħ apparat jew li jkollha aċċess sigur għall-bini.
(15)
The notion of ‘biometric identification’ referred to in this Regulation should be defined as the automated recognition of physical, physiological and behavioural human features such as the face, eye movement, body shape, voice, prosody, gait, posture, heart rate, blood pressure, odour, keystrokes characteristics, for the purpose of establishing an individual’s identity by comparing biometric data of that individual to stored biometric data of individuals in a reference database, irrespective of whether the individual has given its consent or not. This excludes AI systems intended to be used for biometric verification, which includes authentication, whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be and to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, unlocking a device or having security access to premises.
(16)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika” msemmi f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi ddefinit bħala l-assenjazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi għal kategoriji speċifiċi abbażi tad-data bijometrika tagħhom. Tali kategoriji speċifiċi jistgħu jkunu relatati ma' aspetti bħas-sess, l-età, il-kulur tax-xagħar, il-kulur tal-għajnejn, it-tatwaġġi, il-karatteristiċi tal-imġiba jew tal-personalità, il-lingwa, ir-reliġjon, l-appartenenza għal minoranza nazzjonali, l-orjentazzjoni sesswali jew dik politika. Dan ma jinkludix sistemi ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika li huma karatteristika purament anċillari intrinsikament marbuta ma' servizz kummerċjali ieħor, li jfisser li l-karatteristika ma tistax, għal raġunijiet tekniċi oġġettivi, tintuża mingħajr is-servizz prinċipali, u l-integrazzjoni ta' dik il-karatteristika jew funzjonalità mhijiex mezz biex tiġi evitata l-applikabbiltà tar-regoli ta' dan ir-Regolament. Pereżempju, il-filtri li jikkategorizzaw il-karatteristiċi tal-wiċċ jew tal-ġisem użati fis-swieq online jistgħu jikkostitwixxu karatteristika anċillari bħal din peress li jistgħu jintużaw biss fir-rigward tas-servizz prinċipali li jikkonsisti fil-bejgħ ta' prodott billi jippermettu lill-konsumatur jara minn qabel kif jidher il-prodott fuqu nnifsu u jgħin lill-konsumatur jieħu deċiżjoni dwar ix-xiri. Il-filtri użati fuq servizzi ta' network soċjali online li jikkategorizzaw karatteristiċi tal-wiċċ jew tal-ġisem biex jippermettu lill-utenti jżidu jew jimmodifikaw stampi jew vidjos jistgħu jitqiesu wkoll bħala karatteristika anċillari peress li tali filtru ma jistax jintuża mingħajr is-servizz prinċipali tas-servizzi tan-network soċjali li jikkonsisti fil-kondiviżjoni tal-kontenut online.
(16)
The notion of ‘biometric categorisation’ referred to in this Regulation should be defined as assigning natural persons to specific categories on the basis of their biometric data. Such specific categories can relate to aspects such as sex, age, hair colour, eye colour, tattoos, behavioural or personality traits, language, religion, membership of a national minority, sexual or political orientation. This does not include biometric categorisation systems that are a purely ancillary feature intrinsically linked to another commercial service, meaning that the feature cannot, for objective technical reasons, be used without the principal service, and the integration of that feature or functionality is not a means to circumvent the applicability of the rules of this Regulation. For example, filters categorising facial or body features used on online marketplaces could constitute such an ancillary feature as they can be used only in relation to the principal service which consists in selling a product by allowing the consumer to preview the display of the product on him or herself and help the consumer to make a purchase decision. Filters used on online social network services which categorise facial or body features to allow users to add or modify pictures or videos could also be considered to be ancillary feature as such filter cannot be used without the principal service of the social network services consisting in the sharing of content online.
(17)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota” msemmi f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi ddefinit b'mod funzjonali, bħala sistema tal-IA maħsuba għall-identifikazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi mingħajr l-involviment attiv tagħhom, tipikament mill-bogħod, permezz tat-tqabbil tad-data bijometrika ta' persuna mad-data bijometrika li tinsab f'bażi ta' data ta' referenza, irrispettivament mit-teknoloġija, mill-proċessi jew mit-tipi partikolari ta' data bijometrika użati. Tali sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota tipikament jintużaw biex jipperċepixxu diversi persuni jew l-imġiba tagħhom simultanjament sabiex jiffaċilitaw b'mod sinifikanti l-identifikazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi mingħajr l-involviment attiv tagħhom. Dan jeskludi sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-verifika bijometrika, li tinkludi l-awtentikazzjoni, li l-iskop uniku tagħha huwa li tikkonferma li persuna fiżika speċifika hija l-persuna li tiddikjara li hija u li tikkonferma l-identità ta' persuna fiżika għall-iskop uniku li jkollha aċċess għal servizz, li tiftaħ apparat jew li jkollha aċċess sigur għall-bini. Dik l-esklużjoni hija ġġustifikata mill-fatt li tali sistemi x'aktarx ikollhom impatt minuri fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali ta' persuni fiżiċi meta mqabbla mas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota li jistgħu jintużaw għall-ipproċessar tad-data bijometrika ta' għadd kbir ta' persuni mingħajr l-involviment attiv tagħhom. Fil-każ ta' sistemi “fil-ħin reali”, il-qbid tad-data bijometrika, it-tqabbil u l-identifikazzjoni jsiru b'mod istantanju, kważi istantanju jew fi kwalunkwe każ mingħajr dewmien sinifikanti. F'dan ir-rigward, jenħtieġ li ma jkun hemm l-ebda lok li jiġu evitati r-regoli ta' dan ir-Regolament dwar l-użu “fil-ħin reali” tas-sistemi tal-IA kkonċernati billi jiġi previst xi dewmien żgħir. Is-sistemi “fil-ħin reali” jinvolvu l-użu ta' materjal “dirett” jew “kważi dirett”, bħal filmat, iġġenerat minn kamera jew minn apparat ieħor b'funzjonalità simili. Għall-kuntrarju, fil-każ tas-sistemi “f'ħin aktar tard”, id-data bijometrika tkun diġà nkisbet u t-tqabbil u l-identifikazzjoni jsiru biss wara ċertu dewmien sinifikanti. Dan jinvolvi materjal, bħal stampi jew filmati ġġenerati minn kameras tat-televiżjoni b'ċirkwit magħluq jew minn apparati privati, li jkun ġie ġġenerat qabel tkun intużat is-sistema fir-rigward tal-persuni fiżiċi kkonċernati.
(17)
The notion of ‘remote biometric identification system’ referred to in this Regulation should be defined functionally, as an AI system intended for the identification of natural persons without their active involvement, typically at a distance, through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database, irrespectively of the particular technology, processes or types of biometric data used. Such remote biometric identification systems are typically used to perceive multiple persons or their behaviour simultaneously in order to facilitate significantly the identification of natural persons without their active involvement. This excludes AI systems intended to be used for biometric verification, which includes authentication, the sole purpose of which is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be and to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, unlocking a device or having security access to premises. That exclusion is justified by the fact that such systems are likely to have a minor impact on fundamental rights of natural persons compared to the remote biometric identification systems which may be used for the processing of the biometric data of a large number of persons without their active involvement. In the case of ‘real-time’ systems, the capturing of the biometric data, the comparison and the identification occur all instantaneously, near-instantaneously or in any event without a significant delay. In this regard, there should be no scope for circumventing the rules of this Regulation on the ‘real-time’ use of the AI systems concerned by providing for minor delays. ‘Real-time’ systems involve the use of ‘live’ or ‘near-live’ material, such as video footage, generated by a camera or other device with similar functionality. In the case of ‘post’ systems, in contrast, the biometric data has already been captured and the comparison and identification occur only after a significant delay. This involves material, such as pictures or video footage generated by closed circuit television cameras or private devices, which has been generated before the use of the system in respect of the natural persons concerned.
(18)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' “sistema ta' rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet” imsemmi f'dan ir-Regolament jiġi ddefinit bħala sistema tal-IA għall-fini tal-identifikazzjoni jew l-inferenza ta' emozzjonijiet jew intenzjonijiet ta' persuni fiżiċi abbażi tad-data bijometrika tagħhom. Il-kunċett jirreferi għal emozzjonijiet jew intenzjonijiet bħal kuntentizza, diqa, rabja, sorpriża, disgust, imbarazzament, eċċitament, mistħija, disprezz, sodisfazzjon u divertiment. Ma jinkludix stati fiżiċi, bħal uġigħ jew għeja, inkluż, pereżempju, sistemi użati biex jiġi identifikat l-istat tal-għeja tal-bdoti professjonali jew tas-sewwieqa bl-għan li jiġu evitati l-aċċidenti. Dan lanqas ma jinkludi s-sempliċi kxif ta' espressjonijiet, ġesti jew movimenti faċilment apparenti, sakemm ma jintużawx biex jidentifikaw jew jinferixxu emozzjonijiet. Dawk l-espressjonijiet jistgħu jkunu espressjonijiet bażiċi tal-wiċċ bħal ħarsa bl-ikrah jew tbissima, jew ġesti bħall-moviment tal-idejn, dirgħajn jew ras, jew karatteristiċi tal-vuċi ta' persuna, bħal vuċi mgħollija jew minn taħt l-ilsien.
(18)
The notion of ‘emotion recognition system’ referred to in this Regulation should be defined as an AI system for the purpose of identifying or inferring emotions or intentions of natural persons on the basis of their biometric data. The notion refers to emotions or intentions such as happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, disgust, embarrassment, excitement, shame, contempt, satisfaction and amusement. It does not include physical states, such as pain or fatigue, including, for example, systems used in detecting the state of fatigue of professional pilots or drivers for the purpose of preventing accidents. This does also not include the mere detection of readily apparent expressions, gestures or movements, unless they are used for identifying or inferring emotions. Those expressions can be basic facial expressions, such as a frown or a smile, or gestures such as the movement of hands, arms or head, or characteristics of a person’s voice, such as a raised voice or whispering.
(19)
Għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' spazju aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku jinftiehem bħala li jirreferi għal kwalunkwe spazju fiżiku li huwa aċċessibbli għal għadd mhux determinat ta' persuni fiżiċi, u irrispettivament minn jekk l-ispazju inkwistjoni huwiex ta' sjieda privata jew pubblika, irrispettivament mill-attività li għaliha jista' jintuża l-ispazju, bħall-kummerċ, pereżempju, ħwienet, ristoranti, kafetteriji; bħas-servizzi, pereżempju, banek, attivitajiet professjonali, ospitalità; bħas-sport, pereżempju, pixxini, gyms, stadiums; bħat-trasport, pereżempju, stazzjonijiet tal-karozzi tal-linja, tal-metro u tal-ferrovija, ajruporti, mezzi tat-trasport; bħad-divertiment, pereżempju, ċinema, teatri, mużewijiet, swali tal-kunċerti u tal-konferenzi; jew bħar-ikreazzjoni jew mod ieħor, pereżempju, toroq pubbliċi u pjazez, parks, foresti, playgrounds. Jenħtieġ li spazju jiġi kklassifikat bħala aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku anki jekk, irrispettivament mir-restrizzjonijiet potenzjali tal-kapaċità jew tas-sigurtà, l-aċċess ikun soġġett għal ċerti kundizzjonijiet predeterminati li jistgħu jiġu ssodisfati minn għadd mhux determinat ta' persuni, bħax-xiri ta' biljett jew titolu tat-trasport, reġistrazzjoni minn qabel jew li persuna jkollha ċerta età. B'kuntrast ma' dan, jenħtieġ li spazju ma jitqiesx li jkun aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku jekk l-aċċess ikun limitat għal persuni fiżiċi speċifiċi u definiti permezz ta' liġijiet tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali direttament relatati mas-sikurezza jew is-sigurtà pubblika jew permezz tal-manifestazzjoni ċara tar-rieda mill-persuna li jkollha l-awtorità rilevanti fuq il-post. Il-possibbiltà fattwali ta' aċċess waħedha, bħal bieb mhux imsakkar jew xatba miftuħa f'ċint, ma tfissirx li l-ispazju huwa aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku fil-preżenza ta' indikazzjonijiet jew ċirkostanzi li jissuġġerixxu l-kuntrarju, bħal sinjali li jipprojbixxu jew jirrestrinġu l-aċċess. Il-bini ta' kumpaniji u fabbriki, kif ukoll l-uffiċċji u l-postijiet tax-xogħol li huma maħsuba biex jiġu aċċessati biss mill-impjegati u l-fornituri tas-servizzi rilevanti, huma spazji li mhumiex aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku. Jenħtieġ li l-ispazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku ma jinkludux ħabsijiet jew kontroll fil-fruntieri. Xi spazji oħra jistgħu jinkludu spazji mhux aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku kif ukoll spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku, bħall-entrata ta' bini residenzjali privat meħtieġa biex jinkiseb aċċess għal uffiċċju ta' tabib jew ajruport. L-ispazji online ma humiex koperti għax dawn mhumiex spazji fiżiċi. Jekk spazju partikolari jkunx aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku jenħtieġ, madankollu, jiġi determinat abbażi ta' każ b'każ, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-ispeċifiċitajiet tas-sitwazzjoni individwali inkwistjoni.
(19)
For the purposes of this Regulation the notion of ‘publicly accessible space’ should be understood as referring to any physical space that is accessible to an undetermined number of natural persons, and irrespective of whether the space in question is privately or publicly owned, irrespective of the activity for which the space may be used, such as for commerce, for example, shops, restaurants, cafés; for services, for example, banks, professional activities, hospitality; for sport, for example, swimming pools, gyms, stadiums; for transport, for example, bus, metro and railway stations, airports, means of transport; for entertainment, for example, cinemas, theatres, museums, concert and conference halls; or for leisure or otherwise, for example, public roads and squares, parks, forests, playgrounds. A space should also be classified as being publicly accessible if, regardless of potential capacity or security restrictions, access is subject to certain predetermined conditions which can be fulfilled by an undetermined number of persons, such as the purchase of a ticket or title of transport, prior registration or having a certain age. In contrast, a space should not be considered to be publicly accessible if access is limited to specific and defined natural persons through either Union or national law directly related to public safety or security or through the clear manifestation of will by the person having the relevant authority over the space. The factual possibility of access alone, such as an unlocked door or an open gate in a fence, does not imply that the space is publicly accessible in the presence of indications or circumstances suggesting the contrary, such as. signs prohibiting or restricting access. Company and factory premises, as well as offices and workplaces that are intended to be accessed only by relevant employees and service providers, are spaces that are not publicly accessible. Publicly accessible spaces should not include prisons or border control. Some other spaces may comprise both publicly accessible and non-publicly accessible spaces, such as the hallway of a private residential building necessary to access a doctor’s office or an airport. Online spaces are not covered, as they are not physical spaces. Whether a given space is accessible to the public should however be determined on a case-by-case basis, having regard to the specificities of the individual situation at hand.
(20)
Biex jinkisbu l-akbar benefiċċji mis-sistemi tal-IA filwaqt li jiġu protetti d-drittijiet fundamentali, is-saħħa u s-sikurezza u biex ikun jista' jsir kontroll demokratiku, jenħtieġ li l-litteriżmu fl-IA jgħammar lill-fornituri, lill-implimentaturi u lill-persuni affettwati bil-kunċetti meħtieġa biex jieħdu deċiżjonijiet infurmati dwar is-sistemi tal-IA. Dawk il-kunċetti jistgħu jvarjaw fir-rigward tal-kuntest rilevanti u jistgħu jinkludu l-fehim tal-applikazzjoni korretta tal-elementi tekniċi matul il-fażi tal-iżvilupp tas-sistema tal-IA, il-miżuri li għandhom jiġu applikati waqt l-użu tagħha, il-modi xierqa li bihom jiġi interpretat l-output tas-sistema tal-IA, u, fil-każ tal-persuni affettwati, l-għarfien meħtieġ biex jifhmu kif id-deċiżjonijiet meħuda bl-assistenza tal-IA ser ikollhom impatt fuqhom. Fil-kuntest tal-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-litteriżmu fl-IA jipprovdi lill-atturi rilevanti kollha fil-katina tal-valur tal-IA bl-għarfien meħtieġ biex tiġi żgurata l-konformità xierqa u l-infurzar korrett tiegħu. Barra minn hekk, l-implimentazzjoni wiesgħa ta' miżuri ta' litteriżmu fl-IA u l-introduzzjoni ta' azzjonijiet ta' segwitu xierqa jistgħu jikkontribwixxu għat-titjib tal-kundizzjonijiet tax-xogħol u fl-aħħar mill-aħħar isostnu l-konsolidazzjoni, u l-perkors tal-innovazzjoni ta' IA affidabbli fl-Unjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-Bord Ewropew għall-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali (“il-Bord”) jappoġġa lill-Kummissjoni fil-promozzjoni tal-għodod tal-litteriżmu fl-IA, is-sensibilizzazzjoni u l-fehim tal-pubbliku dwar il-benefiċċji, ir-riskji, is-salvagwardji, id-drittijiet u l-obbligi fir-rigward tal-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA. F'kooperazzjoni mal-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni u l-Istati Membri jiffaċilitaw it-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet ta' kondotta volontarji biex javvanzaw il-litteriżmu fl-IA fost il-persuni li jittrattaw l-iżvilupp, it-tħaddim u l-użu tal-IA.
(20)
In order to obtain the greatest benefits from AI systems while protecting fundamental rights, health and safety and to enable democratic control, AI literacy should equip providers, deployers and affected persons with the necessary notions to make informed decisions regarding AI systems. Those notions may vary with regard to the relevant context and can include understanding the correct application of technical elements during the AI system’s development phase, the measures to be applied during its use, the suitable ways in which to interpret the AI system’s output, and, in the case of affected persons, the knowledge necessary to understand how decisions taken with the assistance of AI will have an impact on them. In the context of the application this Regulation, AI literacy should provide all relevant actors in the AI value chain with the insights required to ensure the appropriate compliance and its correct enforcement. Furthermore, the wide implementation of AI literacy measures and the introduction of appropriate follow-up actions could contribute to improving working conditions and ultimately sustain the consolidation, and innovation path of trustworthy AI in the Union. The European Artificial Intelligence Board (the ‘Board’) should support the Commission, to promote AI literacy tools, public awareness and understanding of the benefits, risks, safeguards, rights and obligations in relation to the use of AI systems. In cooperation with the relevant stakeholders, the Commission and the Member States should facilitate the drawing up of voluntary codes of conduct to advance AI literacy among persons dealing with the development, operation and use of AI.
(21)
Biex ikunu żgurati kundizzjonijiet ekwi u protezzjoni effettiva tad-drittijiet u tal-libertajiet tal-individwi madwar l-Unjoni, jenħtieġ li r-regoli stabbiliti b'dan ir-Regolament japplikaw għall-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'mod mhux diskriminatorju, irrispettivament minn jekk humiex stabbiliti fl-Unjoni jew f'pajjiż terz, u għall-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA stabbiliti fl-Unjoni.
(21)
In order to ensure a level playing field and an effective protection of rights and freedoms of individuals across the Union, the rules established by this Regulation should apply to providers of AI systems in a non-discriminatory manner, irrespective of whether they are established within the Union or in a third country, and to deployers of AI systems established within the Union.
(22)
Fid-dawl tan-natura diġitali tagħhom, jenħtieġ li ċerti sistemi tal-IA jkunu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament anki meta ma jiġux introdotti fis-suq, ma jitqiegħdux fis-servizz, u ma jintużawx fl-Unjoni. Pereżempju, dan hu l-każ fejn operatur stabbilit fl-Unjoni jikkuntratta ċerti servizzi lil operatur stabbilit f'pajjiż terz fir-rigward ta' attività li tkun ser titwettaq minn sistema tal-IA u li tikkwalifika bħala b'riskju għoli. F'dawk iċ-ċirkostanzi, is-sistema tal-IA użata f'pajjiż terz mill-operatur tista' tipproċessa d-data miġbura legalment fl-Unjoni u trasferita minnha, u tipprovdi lill-operatur kontraenti fl-Unjoni l-output ta' dik is-sistema tal-IA li jirriżulta minn dak l-ipproċessar, mingħajr ma dik is-sistema tal-IA tiġi introdotta fis-suq, titqiegħed fis-servizz jew tintuża fl-Unjoni. Biex tiġi evitata ċ-ċirkumvenzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament u biex tiġi żgurata protezzjoni effettiva tal-persuni fiżiċi li jinsabu fl-Unjoni, jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament japplika wkoll għall-fornituri u għall-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA li huma stabbiliti f'pajjiż terz, sa fejn l-output prodott minn dawk is-sistemi ikun maħsub biex jintuża fl-Unjoni. Madankollu, biex jitqiesu l-arranġamenti eżistenti u l-ħtiġijiet speċjali għall-kooperazzjoni futura mas-sħab barranin li magħhom jiġu skambjati informazzjoni u evidenza, jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għall-awtoritajiet pubbliċi ta' pajjiż terz u għal organizzazzjonijiet internazzjonali meta jaġixxu fil-qafas ta' kooperazzjoni jew ta' ftehimiet internazzjonali konklużi fil-livell tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali għall-infurzar tal-liġi u għall-kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja mal-Unjoni jew mal-Istati Membri, dment li l-pajjiż terz jew l-organizzazzjoni internazzjonali rilevanti jipprovdu salvagwardji adegwati fir-rigward tal-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet fundamentali tal-individwi. Fejn rilevanti, dan jista' jkopri attivitajiet ta' entitajiet fdati mill-pajjiżi terzi biex iwettqu kompiti speċifiċi b'appoġġ għal tali infurzar tal-liġi u kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja. Tali qafas għall-kooperazzjoni jew ftehimiet ġew stabbiliti b'mod bilaterali bejn l-Istati Membri u pajjiżi terzi jew bejn l-Unjoni Ewropea, il-Europol u aġenziji oħra tal-Unjoni u pajjiżi terzi u organizzazzjonijiet internazzjonali. Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti għas-superviżjoni tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi u dawk ġudizzjarji skont dan ir-Regolament jivvalutaw jekk dawk l-oqfsa għall-kooperazzjoni jew il-ftehimiet internazzjonali jinkludux salvagwardji adegwati fir-rigward tal-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet fundamentali tal-individwi. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali riċevituri u l-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji u l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni li jagħmlu użu minn tali outputs fl-Unjoni jibqgħu responsabbli biex jiżguraw li l-użu tagħhom jikkonforma mal-liġi tal-Unjoni. Meta dawk il-ftehimiet internazzjonali jiġu riveduti jew jiġu konklużi oħrajn ġodda fil-futur, jenħtieġ li l-partijiet kontraenti jagħmlu l-akbar sforzi possibbli biex jallinjaw dawk il-ftehimiet mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(22)
In light of their digital nature, certain AI systems should fall within the scope of this Regulation even when they are not placed on the market, put into service, or used in the Union. This is the case, for example, where an operator established in the Union contracts certain services to an operator established in a third country in relation to an activity to be performed by an AI system that would qualify as high-risk. In those circumstances, the AI system used in a third country by the operator could process data lawfully collected in and transferred from the Union, and provide to the contracting operator in the Union the output of that AI system resulting from that processing, without that AI system being placed on the market, put into service or used in the Union. To prevent the circumvention of this Regulation and to ensure an effective protection of natural persons located in the Union, this Regulation should also apply to providers and deployers of AI systems that are established in a third country, to the extent the output produced by those systems is intended to be used in the Union. Nonetheless, to take into account existing arrangements and special needs for future cooperation with foreign partners with whom information and evidence is exchanged, this Regulation should not apply to public authorities of a third country and international organisations when acting in the framework of cooperation or international agreements concluded at Union or national level for law enforcement and judicial cooperation with the Union or the Member States, provided that the relevant third country or international organisation provides adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals. Where relevant, this may cover activities of entities entrusted by the third countries to carry out specific tasks in support of such law enforcement and judicial cooperation. Such framework for cooperation or agreements have been established bilaterally between Member States and third countries or between the European Union, Europol and other Union agencies and third countries and international organisations. The authorities competent for supervision of the law enforcement and judicial authorities under this Regulation should assess whether those frameworks for cooperation or international agreements include adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals. Recipient national authorities and Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies making use of such outputs in the Union remain accountable to ensure their use complies with Union law. When those international agreements are revised or new ones are concluded in the future, the contracting parties should make utmost efforts to align those agreements with the requirements of this Regulation.
(23)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament japplika wkoll għall-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji u l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni meta dawn jaġixxu bħala fornitur jew implimentatur ta' sistema tal-IA.
(23)
This Regulation should also apply to Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies when acting as a provider or deployer of an AI system.
(24)
Jekk, u sa fejn, is-sistemi tal-IA jiġu introdotti fis-suq, jitqiegħdu fis-servizz, jew jintużaw b'modifika jew mingħajr modifika ta' tali sistemi għal finijiet militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali, dawk jenħtieġ li jiġu esklużi mill-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament irrispettivament minn liema tip ta' entità tkun qed twettaq dawk l-attivitajiet, bħal jekk tkunx entità pubblika jew privata. Fir-rigward ta' finijiet militari u ta' difiża, tali esklużjoni hija ġġustifikata kemm mill-Artikolu 4(2) TUE kif ukoll mill-ispeċifiċitajiet tal-politika ta' difiża komuni tal-Istati Membri u tal-Unjoni koperta mill-Kapitolu 2 tat-Titolu V TUE li huma soġġetti għad-dritt internazzjonali pubbliku, li huwa għalhekk il-qafas legali aktar xieraq għar-regolamentazzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA fil-kuntest tal-użu ta' forza letali u sistemi oħra tal-IA fil-kuntest ta' attivitajiet militari u ta' difiża. Fir-rigward ta' finijiet ta' sigurtà nazzjonali, l-esklużjoni hija ġġustifikata kemm mill-fatt li s-sigurtà nazzjonali tibqa' r-responsabbiltà unika tal-Istati Membri f'konformità mal-Artikolu 4(2) TUE kif ukoll min-natura speċifika u l-ħtiġijiet operazzjonali tal-attivitajiet ta' sigurtà nazzjonali u regoli nazzjonali speċifiċi applikabbli għal dawk l-attivitajiet. Madankollu, jekk sistema tal-IA żviluppata, introdotta fis-suq, imqiegħda fis-servizz jew użata għal finijiet militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali tintuża barra minn dawk temporanjament jew b'mod permanenti għal finijiet oħra, pereżempju, għal finijiet ċivili jew umanitarji, għal finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi jew ta' sigurtà pubblika, tali sistema taqa' fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. F'dak il-każ, jenħtieġ li l-entità li tuża s-sistema tal-IA għal finijiet oħra għajr dawk militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali tiżgura l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA ma' dan ir-Regolament, sakemm is-sistema ma tkunx diġà konformi ma' dan ir-Regolament. Is-sistemi tal-IA introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz għal skop eskluż, jiġifieri militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali, u skop wieħed jew aktar mhux esklużi, bħal finijiet ċivili jew infurzar tal-liġi, jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament u jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' dawk is-sistemi jiżguraw il-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament. F'dawk il-każijiet, jenħtieġ li l-fatt li sistema tal-IA tista' taqa' fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwax il-possibbiltà li entitajiet li qed iwettqu attivitajiet nazzjonali ta' sigurtà, ta' difiża u militari, irrispettivament mit-tip ta' entità li twettaq dawk l-attivitajiet, jużaw sistemi tal-IA għal finijiet ta' sigurtà, militari u ta' difiża nazzjonali, li l-użu tagħhom huwa eskluż mill-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li sistema tal-IA introdotta fis-suq għal finijiet ċivili jew ta' infurzar tal-liġi li tintuża b'modifika jew mingħajr modifika għal finijiet militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali ma taqax fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, irrispettivament mit-tip ta' entità li twettaq dawk l-attivitajiet.
(24)
If, and insofar as, AI systems are placed on the market, put into service, or used with or without modification of such systems for military, defence or national security purposes, those should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation regardless of which type of entity is carrying out those activities, such as whether it is a public or private entity. As regards military and defence purposes, such exclusion is justified both by Article 4(2) TEU and by the specificities of the Member States’ and the common Union defence policy covered by Chapter 2 of Title V TEU that are subject to public international law, which is therefore the more appropriate legal framework for the regulation of AI systems in the context of the use of lethal force and other AI systems in the context of military and defence activities. As regards national security purposes, the exclusion is justified both by the fact that national security remains the sole responsibility of Member States in accordance with Article 4(2) TEU and by the specific nature and operational needs of national security activities and specific national rules applicable to those activities. Nonetheless, if an AI system developed, placed on the market, put into service or used for military, defence or national security purposes is used outside those temporarily or permanently for other purposes, for example, civilian or humanitarian purposes, law enforcement or public security purposes, such a system would fall within the scope of this Regulation. In that case, the entity using the AI system for other than military, defence or national security purposes should ensure the compliance of the AI system with this Regulation, unless the system is already compliant with this Regulation. AI systems placed on the market or put into service for an excluded purpose, namely military, defence or national security, and one or more non-excluded purposes, such as civilian purposes or law enforcement, fall within the scope of this Regulation and providers of those systems should ensure compliance with this Regulation. In those cases, the fact that an AI system may fall within the scope of this Regulation should not affect the possibility of entities carrying out national security, defence and military activities, regardless of the type of entity carrying out those activities, to use AI systems for national security, military and defence purposes, the use of which is excluded from the scope of this Regulation. An AI system placed on the market for civilian or law enforcement purposes which is used with or without modification for military, defence or national security purposes should not fall within the scope of this Regulation, regardless of the type of entity carrying out those activities.
(25)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament jappoġġa l-innovazzjoni, jirrispetta l-libertà tax-xjenza, u ma jdgħajjifx l-attività ta' riċerka u żvilupp. Għalhekk, jeħtieġ li jiġu esklużi mill-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tagħha s-sistemi u l-mudelli tal-IA żviluppati speċifikament u mqiegħda fis-servizz għall-iskop uniku ta' riċerka u żvilupp xjentifiċi. Barra minn hekk, jeħtieġ li jiġi żgurat li dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwax b'xi mod ieħor l-attività xjentifika ta' riċerka u żvilupp dwar is-sistemi jew il-mudelli tal-IA qabel ma jitqiegħdu fis-suq jew fis-servizz. Fir-rigward tar-riċerka orjentata lejn il-prodott, l-ittestjar u l-attività ta' żvilupp fir-rigward ta' sistemi jew mudelli tal-IA, id-dispożizzjonijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament jenħtieġ li ma japplikawx ukoll qabel ma dawk is-sistemi u l-mudelli jitqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jiġu introdotti fis-suq. Dik l-esklużjoni hija mingħajr preġudizzju għall-obbligu ta' konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament meta sistema tal-IA li taqa' fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz bħala riżultat ta' tali attività ta' riċerka u żvilupp u għall-applikazzjoni ta' dispożizzjonijiet dwar ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u ttestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali. Barra minn hekk, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-esklużjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA żviluppati speċifikament u mqiegħda fis-servizz għall-iskop uniku ta' riċerka u żvilupp xjentifiku, jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe sistema oħra tal-IA li tista' tintuża għat-twettiq ta' kwalunkwe attività ta' riċerka u żvilupp tibqa' soġġetta għad-dispożizzjonijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament. Fi kwalunkwe każ, jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe attività ta' riċerka u żvilupp titwettaq f'konformità mal-istandards etiċi u professjonali rikonoxxuti għar-riċerka xjentifika u jenħtieġ li titwettaq f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni applikabbli.
(25)
This Regulation should support innovation, should respect freedom of science, and should not undermine research and development activity. It is therefore necessary to exclude from its scope AI systems and models specifically developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development. Moreover, it is necessary to ensure that this Regulation does not otherwise affect scientific research and development activity on AI systems or models prior to being placed on the market or put into service. As regards product-oriented research, testing and development activity regarding AI systems or models, the provisions of this Regulation should also not apply prior to those systems and models being put into service or placed on the market. That exclusion is without prejudice to the obligation to comply with this Regulation where an AI system falling into the scope of this Regulation is placed on the market or put into service as a result of such research and development activity and to the application of provisions on AI regulatory sandboxes and testing in real world conditions. Furthermore, without prejudice to the exclusion of AI systems specifically developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development, any other AI system that may be used for the conduct of any research and development activity should remain subject to the provisions of this Regulation. In any event, any research and development activity should be carried out in accordance with recognised ethical and professional standards for scientific research and should be conducted in accordance with applicable Union law.
(26)
Biex jiddaħħal sett proporzjonat u effettiv ta' regoli vinkolanti għas-sistemi tal-IA, jenħtieġ jitħaddem approċċ definit b'mod ċar u bbażat fuq ir-riskji. Jenħtieġ li dak l-approċċ ifassal it-tip u l-kontenut ta' dawk ir-regoli skont l-intensità u l-ambitu tar-riskji li jistgħu jiġġeneraw is-sistemi tal-IA. Għalhekk, jeħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti ċerti prattiki mhux aċċettabbli tal-IA, li jiġu stabbiliti rekwiżiti għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u obbligi għall-operaturi rilevanti, u li jiġu stabbiliti obbligi tat-trasparenza għal ċerti sistemi tal-IA.
(26)
In order to introduce a proportionate and effective set of binding rules for AI systems, a clearly defined risk-based approach should be followed. That approach should tailor the type and content of such rules to the intensity and scope of the risks that AI systems can generate. It is therefore necessary to prohibit certain unacceptable AI practices, to lay down requirements for high-risk AI systems and obligations for the relevant operators, and to lay down transparency obligations for certain AI systems.
(27)
Filwaqt li l-approċċ ibbażat fuq ir-riskju huwa l-bażi għal sett proporzjonat u effettiv ta' regoli vinkolanti, huwa importanti li jitfakkru l-Linji gwida tal-2019 dwar l-etika għal IA affidabbli żviluppati mill-AI HLEG maħtur mill-Kummissjoni. F'dawk il-linji gwida l-AI HLEG żviluppa seba' prinċipji etiċi mhux vinkolanti għall-IA li huma maħsuba biex jgħinu li jiġi żgurat li l-IA tkun affidabbli u etikament xierqa. Is-seba' prinċipji jinkludu: intervent u sorveljanza mill-bniedem; robustezza u sikurezza teknika; privatezza u governanza tad-data; trasparenza; diversità, nondiskriminazzjoni u ekwità; benesseri tas-soċjetà u tal-ambjent u responsabbiltà. Mingħajr preġudizzju għar-rekwiżiti legalment vinkolanti ta' dan ir-Regolament u kwalunkwe liġi applikabbli oħra tal-Unjoni, dawk il-linji gwida jikkontribwixxu għat-tfassil ta' IA koerenti, affidabbli u ċċentrata fuq il-bniedem, f'konformità mal-Karta u mal-valuri li fuqhom hija msejsa l-Unjoni. Skont il-linji gwida tal-AI HLEG, intervent u sorveljanza mill-bniedem tfisser li s-sistemi tal-IA jiġu żviluppati u użati bħala għodda li taqdi lin-nies, tirrispetta d-dinjità u l-awtonomija personali tal-bniedem, u li tiffunzjona b'mod li jista' jiġi kkontrollat u ssorveljat mill-bniedem kif xieraq. Robustezza u sikurezza teknika tfisser li s-sistemi tal-IA jiġu żviluppati u użati b'mod li jippermetti r-robustezza fil-każ ta' problemi u reżiljenza kontra tentattivi biex jinbidlu l-użu jew il-prestazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA biex ikun jista' jsir użu illegali minn partijiet terzi, u tiġi minimizzata l-ħsara mhux intenzjonata. Privatezza u governanza tad-data tfisser li s-sistemi tal-IA jiġu żviluppati u użati f'konformità mar-regoli dwar il-privatezza u l-protezzjoni tad-data, filwaqt li tiġi pproċessata data li tissodisfa standards għoljin mil-lat ta' kwalità u integrità. Trasparenza tfisser li s-sistemi tal-IA jiġu żviluppati u użati b'mod li jippermettu traċċabbiltà u spjegabbiltà xierqa, filwaqt li jiżguraw li l-bnedmin ikunu konxji li qed jikkomunikaw jew jinteraġixxu ma' sistema tal-IA kif ukoll jinfurmaw kif xieraq lill-implimentaturi dwar il-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet ta' dik is-sistema tal-IA u lill-persuni affettwati dwar id-drittijiet tagħhom. Diversità, nondiskriminazzjoni u ġustizzja tfisser li s-sistemi tal-IA jiġu żviluppati u użati b'mod li jinkludi atturi differenti u li jippromwovi aċċess ugwali, ugwaljanza bejn il-ġeneri u diversità kulturali filwaqt li jevita impatti diskriminatorji u preġudizzji inġusti li huma pprojbiti mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali. Benesseri tas-soċjetà u tal-ambjent tfisser li s-sistemi tal-IA jiġu żviluppati u użati b'mod sostenibbli u li ma jagħmilx ħsara lill-ambjent kif ukoll b'mod li jkunu ta' benefiċċju għall-bnedmin kollha, filwaqt li jiġu mmonitorjati u vvalutati l-impatti fit-tul fuq l-individwu, is-soċjetà u d-demokrazija. Jenħtieġ li l-applikazzjoni ta' dawk il-prinċipji tiġi riflessa, meta jkun possibbli, fid-disinn u l-użu tal-mudelli tal-IA. Jenħtieġ li fi kwalunkwe każ iservu bħala bażi għall-abbozzar ta' kodiċijiet ta' kondotta skont dan ir-Regolament. Il-partijiet ikkonċernati kollha, inkluż l-industrija, id-dinja akkademika, is-soċjetà ċivili u l-organizzazzjonijiet tal-istandardizzazzjoni, huma mħeġġa jqisu, kif xieraq, il-prinċipji etiċi għall-iżvilupp tal-aħjar prattiki u standards volontarji.
(27)
While the risk-based approach is the basis for a proportionate and effective set of binding rules, it is important to recall the 2019 Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI developed by the independent AI HLEG appointed by the Commission. In those guidelines, the AI HLEG developed seven non-binding ethical principles for AI which are intended to help ensure that AI is trustworthy and ethically sound. The seven principles include human agency and oversight; technical robustness and safety; privacy and data governance; transparency; diversity, non-discrimination and fairness; societal and environmental well-being and accountability. Without prejudice to the legally binding requirements of this Regulation and any other applicable Union law, those guidelines contribute to the design of coherent, trustworthy and human-centric AI, in line with the Charter and with the values on which the Union is founded. According to the guidelines of the AI HLEG, human agency and oversight means that AI systems are developed and used as a tool that serves people, respects human dignity and personal autonomy, and that is functioning in a way that can be appropriately controlled and overseen by humans. Technical robustness and safety means that AI systems are developed and used in a way that allows robustness in the case of problems and resilience against attempts to alter the use or performance of the AI system so as to allow unlawful use by third parties, and minimise unintended harm. Privacy and data governance means that AI systems are developed and used in accordance with privacy and data protection rules, while processing data that meets high standards in terms of quality and integrity. Transparency means that AI systems are developed and used in a way that allows appropriate traceability and explainability, while making humans aware that they communicate or interact with an AI system, as well as duly informing deployers of the capabilities and limitations of that AI system and affected persons about their rights. Diversity, non-discrimination and fairness means that AI systems are developed and used in a way that includes diverse actors and promotes equal access, gender equality and cultural diversity, while avoiding discriminatory impacts and unfair biases that are prohibited by Union or national law. Social and environmental well-being means that AI systems are developed and used in a sustainable and environmentally friendly manner as well as in a way to benefit all human beings, while monitoring and assessing the long-term impacts on the individual, society and democracy. The application of those principles should be translated, when possible, in the design and use of AI models. They should in any case serve as a basis for the drafting of codes of conduct under this Regulation. All stakeholders, including industry, academia, civil society and standardisation organisations, are encouraged to take into account, as appropriate, the ethical principles for the development of voluntary best practices and standards.
(28)
Minbarra l-bosta użi ta' benefiċċju tal-IA, din tista' tintuża ħażin ukoll u tipprovdi għodod ġodda u b'saħħithom għal prattiki manipulattivi, ta' sfruttament u ta' kontroll soċjali. Dawn il-prattiki huma partikolarment ta' ħsara u abbużivi u jenħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti għax imorru kontra l-valuri tal-Unjoni ta' rispett għad-dinjità umana, libertà, ugwaljanza, demokrazija u l-istat tad-dritt u d-drittijiet fundamentali minquxa fil-Karta, fosthom id-dritt ta' nondiskriminazzjoni, għal protezzjoni tad-data u għal privatezza u d-drittijiet tat-tfal.
(28)
Aside from the many beneficial uses of AI, it can also be misused and provide novel and powerful tools for manipulative, exploitative and social control practices. Such practices are particularly harmful and abusive and should be prohibited because they contradict Union values of respect for human dignity, freedom, equality, democracy and the rule of law and fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter, including the right to non-discrimination, to data protection and to privacy and the rights of the child.
(29)
Tekniki manipulattivi bbażati fuq l-IA jistgħu jintużaw biex jipperswadu lin-nies jinvolvu ruħhom f'imġiba mhux mixtieqa, jew biex iqarrqu bihom billi jġiegħluhom jieħdu deċiżjonijiet b'mod li jimmina u jfixkel l-awtonomija, it-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet u l-għażliet liberi tagħhom. L-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz jew l-użu ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA bl-objettiv jew bl-effett li jfixklu materjalment l-imġiba tal-bniedem, fejn x'aktarx isseħħ ħsara sinifikanti, b'mod partikolari li jkollhom impatti negattivi importanti biżżejjed fuq is-saħħa fiżika, psikoloġika jew fuq l-interessi finanzjarji, ikunu partikolarment perikolużi u għalhekk jenħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti. Tali sistemi tal-IA jimplimentaw komponenti subliminali bħall-awdjo, immaġni jew vidjo li l-persuni ma jistgħux jipperċepixxu, peress li dawk l-istimuli jmorru lil hinn mill-perċezzjoni tal-bniedem, jew tekniki manipulattivi jew qarrieqa oħra li jdgħajfu jew ifixklu l-awtonomija, it-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet jew l-għażla libera tal-persuna b'modi li n-nies ma jkunux konxji ta’ dawn it-tekniki jew, fejn ikunu konxji tagħhom, xorta waħda jkunu ingannati jew ma jkunux jistgħu jikkontrollawhom jew jirreżistuhom. Dan jista' jkun iffaċilitat, pereżempju, minn interfaċċi bejn il-moħħ u l-magna jew realtà virtwali peress li jippermettu livell ogħla ta' kontroll ta' liema stimuli jiġu ppreżentati lill-persuni, sa fejn dawn jistgħu jfixklu materjalment l-imġiba tagħhom b'mod li jagħmel ħsara sinifikanti. Barra minn hekk, is-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jisfruttaw ukoll il-vulnerabbiltajiet ta' persuna jew ta' grupp speċifiku ta' persuni minħabba l-età tagħhom, diżabbiltà skont it-tifsira tad-Direttiva (UE) 2019/882 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (16), jew sitwazzjoni soċjali jew ekonomika speċifika li x'aktarx tirrendi lil dawk il-persuni aktar vulnerabbli għal sfruttament bħal persuni li jgħixu f'faqar estrem u minoranzi etniċi jew reliġjużi. Tali sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jiġu introdotti fis-suq, jitqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jintużaw bl-objettiv jew bl-effett li jfixklu materjalment l-imġiba ta' persuna u b'mod li jikkawżaw jew li raġonevolment x'aktarx jikkawżaw ħsara sinifikanti lil dik il-persuna jew lil persuna jew gruppi oħra ta' persuni, inkluż ħsara li tista' takkumula maż-żmien, u għalhekk jenħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti. Jista' ma jkunx possibbli li wieħed jassumi li hemm intenzjoni ta' tfixkil tal-imġiba meta t-tfixkil jirriżulta minn fatturi esterni għas-sistema tal-IA li huma barra mill-kontroll tal-fornitur jew tal-implimentatur, jiġifieri fatturi li jistgħu ma jkunux raġonevolment prevedibbli u għalhekk mhux possibbli għall-fornitur jew għall-implimentatur tas-sistema tal-IA biex jimmitiga. Fi kwalunkwe każ, ma huwiex meħtieġ li l-fornitur jew l-implimentatur ikollhom l-intenzjoni li jikkawżaw ħsara sinifikanti, dment li tali ħsara ma tirriżultax mill-prattiki manipulattivi jew ta' sfruttament li ġejjin mill-IA. Il-projbizzjonijiet għal tali prattiki tal-IA huma komplementari għad-dispożizzjonijiet li jinsabu fid-Direttiva 2005/29/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (17), b'mod partikolari prattiki kummerċjali inġusti li jwasslu għal ħsara ekonomika jew finanzjarja għall-konsumaturi huma pprojbiti fiċ-ċirkostanzi kollha, irrispettivament minn jekk jiġux stabbiliti permezz ta' sistemi tal-IA jew b'xi mod ieħor. Jenħtieġ li l-projbizzjonijiet ta' prattiki manipulattivi u ta' sfruttament f'dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwaw il-prattiki legali fil-kuntest ta' trattament mediku bħat-trattament psikoloġiku ta' marda mentali jew ir-riabilitazzjoni fiżika, meta dawk il-prattiki jitwettqu f'konformità mal-liġi u l-istandards mediċi applikabbli, pereżempju l-kunsens espliċitu tal-individwi jew tar-rappreżentanti legali tagħhom. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-prattiki kummerċjali komuni u leġittimi, pereżempju fil-qasam tar-reklamar, li jikkonformaw mal-liġi applikabbli ma jitqisux fihom infushom bħala li jikkostitwixxu prattiki manipulattivi li jagħmlu ħsara li ġejjin mill-IA.
(29)
AI-enabled manipulative techniques can be used to persuade persons to engage in unwanted behaviours, or to deceive them by nudging them into decisions in a way that subverts and impairs their autonomy, decision-making and free choices. The placing on the market, the putting into service or the use of certain AI systems with the objective to or the effect of materially distorting human behaviour, whereby significant harms, in particular having sufficiently important adverse impacts on physical, psychological health or financial interests are likely to occur, are particularly dangerous and should therefore be prohibited. Such AI systems deploy subliminal components such as audio, image, video stimuli that persons cannot perceive, as those stimuli are beyond human perception, or other manipulative or deceptive techniques that subvert or impair person’s autonomy, decision-making or free choice in ways that people are not consciously aware of those techniques or, where they are aware of them, can still be deceived or are not able to control or resist them. This could be facilitated, for example, by machine-brain interfaces or virtual reality as they allow for a higher degree of control of what stimuli are presented to persons, insofar as they may materially distort their behaviour in a significantly harmful manner. In addition, AI systems may also otherwise exploit the vulnerabilities of a person or a specific group of persons due to their age, disability within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council (16), or a specific social or economic situation that is likely to make those persons more vulnerable to exploitation such as persons living in extreme poverty, ethnic or religious minorities. Such AI systems can be placed on the market, put into service or used with the objective to or the effect of materially distorting the behaviour of a person and in a manner that causes or is reasonably likely to cause significant harm to that or another person or groups of persons, including harms that may be accumulated over time and should therefore be prohibited. It may not be possible to assume that there is an intention to distort behaviour where the distortion results from factors external to the AI system which are outside the control of the provider or the deployer, namely factors that may not be reasonably foreseeable and therefore not possible for the provider or the deployer of the AI system to mitigate. In any case, it is not necessary for the provider or the deployer to have the intention to cause significant harm, provided that such harm results from the manipulative or exploitative AI-enabled practices. The prohibitions for such AI practices are complementary to the provisions contained in Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (17), in particular unfair commercial practices leading to economic or financial harms to consumers are prohibited under all circumstances, irrespective of whether they are put in place through AI systems or otherwise. The prohibitions of manipulative and exploitative practices in this Regulation should not affect lawful practices in the context of medical treatment such as psychological treatment of a mental disease or physical rehabilitation, when those practices are carried out in accordance with the applicable law and medical standards, for example explicit consent of the individuals or their legal representatives. In addition, common and legitimate commercial practices, for example in the field of advertising, that comply with the applicable law should not, in themselves, be regarded as constituting harmful manipulative AI-enabled practices.
(30)
Jenħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti s-sistemi ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika li huma bbażati fuq id-data bijometrika tal-persuni fiżiċi, bħall-wiċċ jew il-marka tas-swaba' ta' persuna individwali, biex jiddeduċu jew jinferixxu l-opinjonijiet politiċi ta' individwu, is-sħubija fi trade union, it-twemmin reliġjuż jew filosofiku, ir-razza, il-ħajja sesswali jew l-orjentazzjoni sesswali. Jenħtieġ li dik il-projbizzjoni ma tkoprix it-tikkettar, il-filtrazzjoni jew il-kategorizzazzjoni legali ta' settijiet ta' data bijometriċi miksuba f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali skont id-data bijometrika, bħall-issortjar ta' immaġnijiet skont il-kulur tax-xagħar jew il-kulur tal-għajnejn, li jistgħu jintużaw pereżempju fil-qasam tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
(30)
Biometric categorisation systems that are based on natural persons’ biometric data, such as an individual person’s face or fingerprint, to deduce or infer an individuals’ political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, race, sex life or sexual orientation should be prohibited. That prohibition should not cover the lawful labelling, filtering or categorisation of biometric data sets acquired in line with Union or national law according to biometric data, such as the sorting of images according to hair colour or eye colour, which can for example be used in the area of law enforcement.
(31)
Sistemi tal-IA li jipprovdu punteġġ għaċ-ċittadini minn atturi pubbliċi jew privati fir-rigward ta' persuni fiżiċi jistgħu jwasslu għal eżiti diskriminatorji u għall-esklużjoni ta' ċerti gruppi. Jistgħu jiksru d-dritt għad-dinjità u ta' nondiskriminazzjoni u l-valuri tal-ugwaljanza u tal-ġustizzja. Tali sistemi tal-IA jevalwaw jew jikklassifikaw persuni fiżiċi jew gruppi ta' persuni abbażi ta' diversi punti tad-data relatati mal-imġiba soċjali tagħhom f'kuntesti multipli jew karatteristiċi personali jew tal-personalità magħrufa, inferiti jew imbassrin matul ċerti perjodi ta' żmien. Il-punteġġ għaċ-ċittadini miksub minn dawn is-sistemi tal-IA jista' jwassal għal trattament detrimentali jew mhux favorevoli ta' persuni fiżiċi jew ta' gruppi sħaħ tagħhom f'kuntesti soċjali, li ma jkunux marbuta mal-kuntest li fih kienet oriġinarjament iġġenerata jew inġabret id-data, jew għal trattament detrimentali sproporzjonat jew mhux iġġustifikat għall-gravità tal-imġiba soċjali tagħhom. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti s-sistemi tal-IA li jinvolvu prattiki ta' punteġġ inaċċettabbli u li jwasslu għal tali eżiti detrimentali jew mhux favorevoli. Jenħtieġ li dik il-projbizzjoni ma taffettwax il-prattiki ta' evalwazzjoni legali ta' persuni fiżiċi li jitwettqu għal skop speċifiku f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali.
(31)
AI systems providing social scoring of natural persons by public or private actors may lead to discriminatory outcomes and the exclusion of certain groups. They may violate the right to dignity and non-discrimination and the values of equality and justice. Such AI systems evaluate or classify natural persons or groups thereof on the basis of multiple data points related to their social behaviour in multiple contexts or known, inferred or predicted personal or personality characteristics over certain periods of time. The social score obtained from such AI systems may lead to the detrimental or unfavourable treatment of natural persons or whole groups thereof in social contexts, which are unrelated to the context in which the data was originally generated or collected or to a detrimental treatment that is disproportionate or unjustified to the gravity of their social behaviour. AI systems entailing such unacceptable scoring practices and leading to such detrimental or unfavourable outcomes should therefore be prohibited. That prohibition should not affect lawful evaluation practices of natural persons that are carried out for a specific purpose in accordance with Union and national law.
(32)
L-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” ta' persuni fiżiċi fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għall-finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi huwa partikolarment intrużiv għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tal-persuni kkonċernati, peress li dan jista' jaffettwa l-ħajja privata ta' parti kbira tal-popolazzjoni, jevoka sentiment ta' sorveljanza kostanti u indirettament jiddisswadi l-eżerċitar tal-libertà ta' għaqda u ta' drittijiet fundamentali oħra. L-inakkuratezzi tekniċi tas-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota ta' persuni fiżiċi jistgħu jwasslu għal riżultati preġudikati u jħallu effetti diskriminatorji. Tali riżultati preġudikati possibbli u effetti diskriminatorji huma partikolarment rilevanti fir-rigward tal-età, l-etniċità, ir-razza, is-sess jew id-diżabilitajiet. Barra minn hekk, l-immedjatezza tal-impatt u l-opportunitajiet limitati għal aktar kontrolli jew korrezzjonijiet fir-rigward tal-użu ta' dawn is-sistemi li joperaw fil-ħin reali jinvolvu riskji akbar għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tal-persuni kkonċernati fil-kuntest ta’, jew l-impatt mill-attivitajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
(32)
The use of AI systems for ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification of natural persons in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement is particularly intrusive to the rights and freedoms of the concerned persons, to the extent that it may affect the private life of a large part of the population, evoke a feeling of constant surveillance and indirectly dissuade the exercise of the freedom of assembly and other fundamental rights. Technical inaccuracies of AI systems intended for the remote biometric identification of natural persons can lead to biased results and entail discriminatory effects. Such possible biased results and discriminatory effects are particularly relevant with regard to age, ethnicity, race, sex or disabilities. In addition, the immediacy of the impact and the limited opportunities for further checks or corrections in relation to the use of such systems operating in real-time carry heightened risks for the rights and freedoms of the persons concerned in the context of, or impacted by, law enforcement activities.
(33)
Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li l-użu ta' dawk is-sistemi għall-finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi jiġi pprojbit, minbarra f'sitwazzjonijiet elenkati b'mod eżawrjenti u definiti b'mod ristrett, meta l-użu hu strettament meħtieġ biex jinkiseb interess pubbliku sostanzjali li l-importanza tiegħu tisboq ir-riskji. Dawk is-sitwazzjonijiet jinvolvu t-tiftix għal ċerti vittmi tal-kriminalità inkluż il-persuni neqsin; ċerti theddidiet għall-ħajja jew għas-sikurezza fiżika ta' persuni fiżiċi jew ta' attakk terroristiku; u l-lokalizzazzjoni jew l-identifikazzjoni ta' awturi jew suspettati tar-reati kriminali elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, fejn dawk ir-reati kriminali jkunu punibbli fl-Istat Membru kkonċernat b'piena li ċċaħħad il-libertà jew b'ordni ta' detenzjoni għal perjodu massimu ta' mill-inqas erba' snin, u kif inhuma definiti fil-liġi ta' dak l-Istat Membru. Tali limitu fil-piena li ċċaħħad il-libertà jew l-ordni ta' detenzjoni f'konformità mal-liġi nazzjonali jikkontribwixxi biex jiġi żgurat li r-reat jenħtieġ li jkun serju biżżejjed biex potenzjalment jiġġustifika l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali”. Barra minn hekk, il-lista ta’ reati kriminali pprovduta f’anness ta’ dan ir-Regolament hija bbażata fuq it-32 reat kriminali elenkati fid-Deċiżjoni Qafas tal-Kunsill 2002/584/ĠAI (18), b'kont meħud li xi wħud minn dawk ir-reati aktarx li fil-prattika jkunu aktar rilevanti minn oħrajn, fis-sens li r-rikors għal identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” jkun prevedibbilment meħtieġ u proporzjonat sa gradi varji ħafna biex fil-prattika jkun hemm il-lokalizzazzjoni jew l-identifikazzjoni ta' awtur ta' reat kriminali jew ta' persuna suspettata b'reati kriminali differenti elenkati u b'kunsiderazzjoni tad-differenzi li x'aktarx ikun hemm fil-gravità, fil-probabbiltà u fl-iskala tal-ħsara jew tal-konsegwenzi negattivi possibbli. Theddida imminenti għall-ħajja jew għas-sikurezza fiżika ta' persuni fiżiċi tista' tirriżulta wkoll minn tfixkil serju tal-infrastruttura kritika, kif definit fl-Artikolu 2, il-punt (4) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2022/2557 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (19), fejn it-tfixkil jew il-qerda ta' tali infrastruttura kritika tirriżulta f'theddida imminenti għall-ħajja jew għas-sikurezza fiżika ta' persuna, inkluż permezz ta' dannu serju għall-forniment ta' provvisti bażiċi lill-popolazzjoni jew għall-eżerċizzju tal-funzjoni ewlenija tal-Istat. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament jippreserva l-kapaċità tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil li jwettqu verifiki tal-identità fil-preżenza tal-persuna kkonċernata f'konformità mal-kundizzjonijiet stipulati fil-liġi tal-Unjoni u f'dik nazzjonali għal tali verifiki. B'mod partikolari, jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-kontroll fil-fruntiera, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil ikunu jistgħu jużaw sistemi ta' informazzjoni, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali, biex jidentifikaw persuni li, matul kontroll tal-identità, jew jirrifjutaw li jiġu identifikati jew ma jkunux jistgħu jiddikjaraw jew jagħtu prova tal-identità tagħhom, mingħajr ma tkun meħtieġa minn dan ir-Regolament li tikseb awtorizzazzjoni minn qabel. Din tista' tkun, pereżempju, persuna involuta f'reat, li ma tkunx trid, jew ma tkunx tista', minħabba aċċident jew kundizzjoni medika, tiddivulga l-identità tagħha lill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
(33)
The use of those systems for the purpose of law enforcement should therefore be prohibited, except in exhaustively listed and narrowly defined situations, where the use is strictly necessary to achieve a substantial public interest, the importance of which outweighs the risks. Those situations involve the search for certain victims of crime including missing persons; certain threats to the life or to the physical safety of natural persons or of a terrorist attack; and the localisation or identification of perpetrators or suspects of the criminal offences listed in an annex to this Regulation, where those criminal offences are punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years and as they are defined in the law of that Member State. Such a threshold for the custodial sentence or detention order in accordance with national law contributes to ensuring that the offence should be serious enough to potentially justify the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems. Moreover, the list of criminal offences provided in an annex to this Regulation is based on the 32 criminal offences listed in the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (18), taking into account that some of those offences are, in practice, likely to be more relevant than others, in that the recourse to ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification could, foreseeably, be necessary and proportionate to highly varying degrees for the practical pursuit of the localisation or identification of a perpetrator or suspect of the different criminal offences listed and having regard to the likely differences in the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm or possible negative consequences. An imminent threat to life or the physical safety of natural persons could also result from a serious disruption of critical infrastructure, as defined in Article 2, point (4) of Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council (19), where the disruption or destruction of such critical infrastructure would result in an imminent threat to life or the physical safety of a person, including through serious harm to the provision of basic supplies to the population or to the exercise of the core function of the State. In addition, this Regulation should preserve the ability for law enforcement, border control, immigration or asylum authorities to carry out identity checks in the presence of the person concerned in accordance with the conditions set out in Union and national law for such checks. In particular, law enforcement, border control, immigration or asylum authorities should be able to use information systems, in accordance with Union or national law, to identify persons who, during an identity check, either refuse to be identified or are unable to state or prove their identity, without being required by this Regulation to obtain prior authorisation. This could be, for example, a person involved in a crime, being unwilling, or unable due to an accident or a medical condition, to disclose their identity to law enforcement authorities.
(34)
Biex ikun żgurat li dawk is-sistemi jintużaw b'mod responsabbli u proporzjonat, hu importanti wkoll li jiġi stabbilit li, f'kull waħda minn dawk is-sitwazzjonijiet elenkati b'mod eżawrjenti u definiti b'mod ristrett, jenħtieġ jitqiesu ċerti elementi, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tan-natura tas-sitwazzjoni li twassal għat-talba u l-konsegwenzi tal-użu għad-drittijiet u għal-libertajiet tal-persuni kollha kkonċernati u s-salvagwardji u l-kundizzjonijiet previsti fl-użu. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-użu tas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi jiġi implimentat biss biex jikkonferma l-identità tal-individwu fil-mira b'mod speċifiku u jenħtieġ li jkun limitat għal dak li huwa strettament meħtieġ fir-rigward tal-perjodu ta' żmien, kif ukoll il-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ġeografiku u personali, filwaqt li jitqiesu b'mod partikolari l-evidenza jew l-indikazzjonijiet rigward it-theddid, il-vittmi jew l-awtur. Jenħtieġ li l-użu tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota fil-ħin reali fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku jiġi awtorizzat biss jekk l-awtorità rilevanti tal-infurzar tal-liġi tkun lestiet valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali u, sakemm ma jkunx previst mod ieħor f'dan ir-Regolament, tkun irreġistrat is-sistema fil-bażi tad-data kif stipulat f'dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li l-bażi ta' data ta' referenza tal-persuni tkun adattata għal kull każ ta' użu f'kull waħda mis-sitwazzjonijiet imsemmija hawn fuq.
(34)
In order to ensure that those systems are used in a responsible and proportionate manner, it is also important to establish that, in each of those exhaustively listed and narrowly defined situations, certain elements should be taken into account, in particular as regards the nature of the situation giving rise to the request and the consequences of the use for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned and the safeguards and conditions provided for with the use. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement should be deployed only to confirm the specifically targeted individual’s identity and should be limited to what is strictly necessary concerning the period of time, as well as the geographic and personal scope, having regard in particular to the evidence or indications regarding the threats, the victims or perpetrator. The use of the real-time remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces should be authorised only if the relevant law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment and, unless provided otherwise in this Regulation, has registered the system in the database as set out in this Regulation. The reference database of persons should be appropriate for each use case in each of the situations mentioned above.
(35)
Jenħtieġ li kull użu tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi jkun soġġett għal awtorizzazzjoni espliċita u speċifika minn awtorità ġudizzjarja jew minn awtorità amministrattiva indipendenti ta' Stat Membru li d-deċiżjoni tagħha tkun vinkolanti. Jenħtieġ li tali awtorizzazzjoni fil-prinċipju tinkiseb qabel l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA bil-ħsieb li tiġi identifikata persuna jew persuni. Jenħtieġ li jitħallew isiru eċċezzjonijiet għal dik ir-regola f'sitwazzjonijiet debitament ġustifikati abbażi ta' urġenza, jiġifieri, f'sitwazzjonijiet meta l-ħtieġa li tintuża s-sistema kkonċernata tkun tali li tagħmilha effettivament u oġġettivament impossibbli li tinkiseb awtorizzazzjoni qabel ma jibda l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA. Jenħtieġ li f'sitwazzjonijiet ta' urġenza bħal dawn, l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA jkun ristrett għall-minimu assolut meħtieġ u jenħtieġ li jkun soġġett għal salvagwardji u għal kundizzjonijiet xierqa, kif determinati fil-liġi nazzjonali u speċifikati fil-kuntest ta' kull każ individwali ta' użu urġenti mill-awtorità tal-infurzar tal-liġi nnifisha. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li f'sitwazzjonijiet bħal dawn l-awtorità tal-infurzar tal-liġi titlob tali awtorizzazzjoni filwaqt li tipprovdi r-raġunijiet għaliex ma setgħetx titlobha qabel, mingħajr dewmien żejjed u f'mhux aktar tard minn 24 siegħa. Jekk tali awtorizzazzjoni tiġi rrifjutata, jenħtieġ li l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika f'ħin reali marbuta ma' dik l-awtorizzazzjoni jitwaqqaf b'effett immedjat u jenħtieġ li d-data kollha relatata ma' dan l-użu titwarrab u titħassar. Din id-data tinkludi data tal-input miksuba direttament minn sistema tal-IA waqt l-użu ta' tali sistema kif ukoll ir-riżultati u l-outputs tal-użu marbut ma' dik l-awtorizzazzjoni. Jenħtieġ li ma tinkludix input li jkun miksub legalment f'konformità ma' liġi tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali oħra. Fi kwalunkwe każ, jenħtieġ li l-ebda deċiżjoni li tipproduċi effett legali negattiv fuq persuna ma tittieħed biss abbażi tal-output tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota.
(35)
Each use of a ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement should be subject to an express and specific authorisation by a judicial authority or by an independent administrative authority of a Member State whose decision is binding. Such authorisation should, in principle, be obtained prior to the use of the AI system with a view to identifying a person or persons. Exceptions to that rule should be allowed in duly justified situations on grounds of urgency, namely in situations where the need to use the systems concerned is such as to make it effectively and objectively impossible to obtain an authorisation before commencing the use of the AI system. In such situations of urgency, the use of the AI system should be restricted to the absolute minimum necessary and should be subject to appropriate safeguards and conditions, as determined in national law and specified in the context of each individual urgent use case by the law enforcement authority itself. In addition, the law enforcement authority should in such situations request such authorisation while providing the reasons for not having been able to request it earlier, without undue delay and at the latest within 24 hours. If such an authorisation is rejected, the use of real-time biometric identification systems linked to that authorisation should cease with immediate effect and all the data related to such use should be discarded and deleted. Such data includes input data directly acquired by an AI system in the course of the use of such system as well as the results and outputs of the use linked to that authorisation. It should not include input that is legally acquired in accordance with another Union or national law. In any case, no decision producing an adverse legal effect on a person should be taken based solely on the output of the remote biometric identification system.
(36)
Sabiex iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom f'konformità mar-rekwiżiti stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament kif ukoll fir-regoli nazzjonali, jenħtieġ li l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti u l-awtorità nazzjonali għall-protezzjoni tad-data jiġu nnotifikati b'kull użu tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika f'ħin reali. Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tal-protezzjoni tad-data li jkunu ġew innotifikati jippreżentaw rapport annwali lill-Kummissjoni dwar l-użu tas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika f'ħin reali.
(36)
In order to carry out their tasks in accordance with the requirements set out in this Regulation as well as in national rules, the relevant market surveillance authority and the national data protection authority should be notified of each use of the real-time biometric identification system. Market surveillance authorities and the national data protection authorities that have been notified should submit to the Commission an annual report on the use of real-time biometric identification systems.
(37)
Barra minn hekk, jixraq li, fi ħdan il-qafas eżawrjenti stabbilit b'dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li jkun previst li dan l-użu fit-territorju ta' Stat Membru f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament ikun possibbli biss meta u sa fejn l-Istat Membru kkonċernat ikun iddeċieda li jipprevedi b'mod espliċitu l-possibbiltà li jawtorizza dan l-użu fir-regoli dettaljati tiegħu tal-liġi nazzjonali. Għaldaqstant, l-Istati Membri huma liberi skont dan ir-Regolament li ma jipprevedu l-ebda possibbiltà bħal din jew li jipprevedu biss din il-possibbiltà fir-rigward ta' wħud mill-objettivi li jistgħu jiġġustifikaw l-użu awtorizzat identifikat f'dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li tali regoli nazzjonali jiġu nnotifikati lill-Kummissjoni fi żmien 30 jum mill-adozzjoni tagħhom.
(37)
Furthermore, it is appropriate to provide, within the exhaustive framework set by this Regulation that such use in the territory of a Member State in accordance with this Regulation should only be possible where and in as far as the Member State concerned has decided to expressly provide for the possibility to authorise such use in its detailed rules of national law. Consequently, Member States remain free under this Regulation not to provide for such a possibility at all or to only provide for such a possibility in respect of some of the objectives capable of justifying authorised use identified in this Regulation. Such national rules should be notified to the Commission within 30 days of their adoption.
(38)
L-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota fil-ħin reali ta' persuni fiżiċi fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi bilfors jinvolvi l-ipproċessar ta' data bijometrika. Ir-regoli ta' dan ir-Regolament li jipprojbixxu dan l-użu, soġġetta għal ċerti eċċezzjonijiet, u li huma bbażati fuq l-Artikolu 16 TFUE, jenħtieġ japplikaw bħala lex specialis fir-rigward tar-regoli dwar l-ipproċessar tad-data bijometrika li jinsabu fl-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, u b'hekk jirregolaw dan l-użu u l-ipproċessar tad-data bijometrika involuta b'mod eżawrjenti. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li dawn l-użu u l-ipproċessar ikunu possibbli biss sa fejn ikun kompatibbli mal-qafas stabbilit b'dan ir-Regolament, mingħajr ma jkun hemm ambitu, barra minn dak il-qafas, għall-awtoritajiet kompetenti, meta jaġixxu għall-finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi, li jużaw dawn is-sistemi u jipproċessaw din id-data b'rabta magħhom abbażi tar-raġunijiet elenkati fl-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. F'dak il-kuntest, dan ir-Regolament mhux maħsub biex jipprovdi l-bażi legali għall-ipproċessar ta' data personali skont l-Artikolu 8 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. Madankollu, jenħtieġ li l-użu tas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota fil-ħin reali fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet oħra għajr l-infurzar tal-liġi, inkluż minn awtoritajiet kompetenti, ma jkunx kopert mill-qafas speċifiku rigward dan l-użu għall-finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi stabbilit b'dan ir-Regolament. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li dan l-użu għal finijiet oħra għajr l-infurzar tal-liġi ma jkunx soġġett għar-rekwiżit ta' awtorizzazzjoni skont dan ir-Regolament u r-regoli dettaljati applikabbli tal-liġi nazzjonali li jistgħu jagħtu effett lil dik l-awtorizzazzjoni.
(38)
The use of AI systems for real-time remote biometric identification of natural persons in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement necessarily involves the processing of biometric data. The rules of this Regulation that prohibit, subject to certain exceptions, such use, which are based on Article 16 TFEU, should apply as lex specialis in respect of the rules on the processing of biometric data contained in Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, thus regulating such use and the processing of biometric data involved in an exhaustive manner. Therefore, such use and processing should be possible only in as far as it is compatible with the framework set by this Regulation, without there being scope, outside that framework, for the competent authorities, where they act for purpose of law enforcement, to use such systems and process such data in connection thereto on the grounds listed in Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. In that context, this Regulation is not intended to provide the legal basis for the processing of personal data under Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. However, the use of real-time remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for purposes other than law enforcement, including by competent authorities, should not be covered by the specific framework regarding such use for the purpose of law enforcement set by this Regulation. Such use for purposes other than law enforcement should therefore not be subject to the requirement of an authorisation under this Regulation and the applicable detailed rules of national law that may give effect to that authorisation.
(39)
Jenħtieġ li kull ipproċessar tad-data bijometrika u ta' data personali oħra involuta fl-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika, għajr b'rabta mal-użu tas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi kif regolat b'dan ir-Regolament, jibqa' jikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti kollha li jirriżultaw mill-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. Għal finijiet għajr l-infurzar tal-liġi, l-Artikolu 9(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 u l-Artikolu 10(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725 jipprojbixxu l-ipproċessar ta' data bijometrika soġġetta għal eċċezzjonijiet limitati kif previst f'dawk l-Artikoli. Fl-applikazzjoni tal-Artikolu 9(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, l-użu tal-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota għal finijiet oħra għajr l-infurzar tal-liġi diġà kien soġġett għal deċiżjonijiet ta' projbizzjoni mill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tal-protezzjoni tad-data.
(39)
Any processing of biometric data and other personal data involved in the use of AI systems for biometric identification, other than in connection to the use of real-time remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement as regulated by this Regulation, should continue to comply with all requirements resulting from Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. For purposes other than law enforcement, Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 prohibit the processing of biometric data subject to limited exceptions as provided in those Articles. In the application of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the use of remote biometric identification for purposes other than law enforcement has already been subject to prohibition decisions by national data protection authorities.
(40)
F'konformità mal-Artikolu 6a tal-Protokoll Nru 21 dwar il-pożizzjoni tar-Renju Unit u tal-Irlanda fir-rigward tal-ispazju ta' libertà, sigurtà u ġustizzja, kif anness mat-TUE u mat-TFUE, l-Irlanda mhix marbuta bir-regoli stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (g), sa fejn japplika għall-użu ta' sistemi ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika għal attivitajiet fil-qasam tal-kooperazzjoni tal-pulizija u l-kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja f'materji kriminali, l-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (d), sa fejn japplika għall-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA koperti minn dik id-dispożizzjoni, l-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h), l-Artikolu 5(2) sa (6) u l-Artikolu 26(10) ta' dan ir-Regolament adottat abbażi tal-Artikolu 16 TFUE relatati mal-ipproċessar ta' data personali mill-Istati Membri meta jwettqu attivitajiet li huma fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-Kapitolu 4 jew tal-Kapitolu 5 tat-Titolu V tal-Parti Tlieta TFUE, meta l-Irlanda mhix marbuta bir-regoli li jirregolaw il-forom ta' kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja f'materji kriminali jew ta' kooperazzjoni tal-pulizija li jeħtieġu konformità mad-dispożizzjonijiet stabbiliti abbażi tal-Artikolu 16 TFUE.
(40)
In accordance with Article 6a of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, as annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Ireland is not bound by the rules laid down in Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (g), to the extent it applies to the use of biometric categorisation systems for activities in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (d), to the extent it applies to the use of AI systems covered by that provision, Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (h), Article 5(2) to (6) and Article 26(10) of this Regulation adopted on the basis of Article 16 TFEU which relate to the processing of personal data by the Member States when carrying out activities falling within the scope of Chapter 4 or Chapter 5 of Title V of Part Three of the TFEU, where Ireland is not bound by the rules governing the forms of judicial cooperation in criminal matters or police cooperation which require compliance with the provisions laid down on the basis of Article 16 TFEU.
(41)
F'konformità mal-Artikoli 2 u 2a tal-Protokoll Nru 22 dwar il-pożizzjoni tad-Danimarka, kif anness mat-TUE u mat-TFUE, id-Danimarka mhix marbuta bir-regoli stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (g) sa fejn japplika għall-użu ta' sistemi ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika għal attivitajiet fil-qasam tal-kooperazzjoni tal-pulizija u l-kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja f'materji kriminali, l-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (d), sa fejn japplikaw għall-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA koperti minn dik id-dispożizzjoni, l-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h), (2) sa (6) u l-Artikolu 26(10) ta' dan ir-Regolament adottat abbażi tal-Artikolu 16 TFUE, u lanqas mhi soġġetta għall-applikazzjoni tagħhom, relatati mal-ipproċessar tad-data personali mill-Istati Membri meta jwettqu l-attivitajiet li huma fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-Kapitolu 4 jew tal-Kapitolu 5 tat-Titolu V tal-Parti Tlieta TFUE.
(41)
In accordance with Articles 2 and 2a of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not bound by rules laid down in Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (g), to the extent it applies to the use of biometric categorisation systems for activities in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (d), to the extent it applies to the use of AI systems covered by that provision, Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (h), (2) to (6) and Article 26(10) of this Regulation adopted on the basis of Article 16 TFEU, or subject to their application, which relate to the processing of personal data by the Member States when carrying out activities falling within the scope of Chapter 4 or Chapter 5 of Title V of Part Three of the TFEU.
(42)
Jenħtieġ li f'konformità mal-preżunzjoni tal-innoċenza, il-persuni fiżiċi fl-Unjoni dejjem jiġu ġġudikati fuq l-imġiba reali tagħhom. Jenħtieġ li l-persuni fiżiċi qatt ma jiġu ġġudikati fuq imġiba prevista mill-IA abbażi biss tat-tfassil ta' profili, tal-kwalitajiet u l-karatteristiċi tal-personalità tagħhom, bħan-nazzjonalità, il-post tat-twelid, il-post tar-residenza, l-għadd ta' tfal, il-livell ta' dejn jew it-tip ta' karozza, mingħajr suspett raġonevoli li dik il-persuna tkun involuta f'attività kriminali abbażi ta' fatti verifikabbli oġġettivi u mingħajr il-valutazzjoni ta' tali fatti mill-bniedem. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jiġu pprojbiti l-valutazzjonijiet tar-riskju mwettqa fir-rigward ta' persuni fiżiċi sabiex tiġi vvalutata l-probabbiltà li jwettqu offiża jew biex titbassar l-okkorrenza ta' reat kriminali attwali jew potenzjali abbażi biss tat-tfassil ta' profili tagħhom jew tal-valutazzjoni tal-kwalitajiet u l-karatteristiċi tal-personalità tagħhom. Fi kwalunkwe każ, dik il-projbizzjoni ma tirreferix għal u ma ssemmix analitika tar-riskju li mhijiex ibbażata fuq it-tfassil ta' profili ta' individwi jew fuq il-kwalitajiet tal-personalità u l-karatteristiċi ta' individwi, bħal sistemi tal-IA li jużaw analitika tar-riskju biex jivvalutaw l-probabbiltà ta' frodi finanzjarja minn impriżi abbażi ta' tranżazzjonijiet suspettużi jew għodod analitiċi tar-riskju li jipprevedu l-probabbiltà ta' lokalizzazzjoni ta' narkotiċi jew oġġetti illeċiti mill-awtoritajiet doganali, pereżempju abbażi ta' rotot ta' traffikar magħrufa.
(42)
In line with the presumption of innocence, natural persons in the Union should always be judged on their actual behaviour. Natural persons should never be judged on AI-predicted behaviour based solely on their profiling, personality traits or characteristics, such as nationality, place of birth, place of residence, number of children, level of debt or type of car, without a reasonable suspicion of that person being involved in a criminal activity based on objective verifiable facts and without human assessment thereof. Therefore, risk assessments carried out with regard to natural persons in order to assess the likelihood of their offending or to predict the occurrence of an actual or potential criminal offence based solely on profiling them or on assessing their personality traits and characteristics should be prohibited. In any case, that prohibition does not refer to or touch upon risk analytics that are not based on the profiling of individuals or on the personality traits and characteristics of individuals, such as AI systems using risk analytics to assess the likelihood of financial fraud by undertakings on the basis of suspicious transactions or risk analytic tools to predict the likelihood of the localisation of narcotics or illicit goods by customs authorities, for example on the basis of known trafficking routes.
(43)
Jenħtieġ li l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz għal dak l-għan speċifiku, jew l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA li joħolqu jew jespandu bażijiet tad-data tar-rikonoxximent tal-wiċċ permezz ta' scraping mhux immirat tal-immaġnijiet tal-wiċċ mill-internet jew mill-filmati tas-CCTV jiġu pprojbiti, peress li dik il-prattika żżid mas-sens ta' sorveljanza tal-massa u tista' twassal għal ksur serju tad-drittijiet fundamentali, inkluż id-dritt għall-privatezza.
(43)
The placing on the market, the putting into service for that specific purpose, or the use of AI systems that create or expand facial recognition databases through the untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage, should be prohibited because that practice adds to the feeling of mass surveillance and can lead to gross violations of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy.
(44)
Hemm tħassib serju dwar il-bażi xjentifika tas-sistemi tal-IA li għandhom l-għan li jidentifikaw jew jinferixxu l-emozzjonijiet, b'mod partikolari peress li l-espressjoni tal-emozzjonijiet tvarja b'mod konsiderevoli bejn il-kulturi u s-sitwazzjonijiet, u anke f'individwu wieħed. Fost in-nuqqasijiet ewlenin ta' sistemi bħal dawn hemm l-affidabbiltà limitata, in-nuqqas ta' speċifiċità u l-ġeneralizzabbiltà limitata. Għalhekk, is-sistemi tal-IA li jidentifikaw jew jinferixxu emozzjonijiet jew intenzjonijiet ta' persuni fiżiċi abbażi tad-data bijometrika tagħhom jistgħu jwasslu għal eżiti diskriminatorji u jistgħu jkunu intrużivi għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tal-persuni kkonċernati. Meta jitqies l-iżbilanċ tal-poter fil-kuntest tax-xogħol jew tal-edukazzjoni, flimkien man-natura intrużiva ta' dawn is-sistemi, tali sistemi jistgħu jwasslu għal trattament detrimentali jew sfavorevoli ta' ċerti persuni fiżiċi jew gruppi sħaħ tagħhom. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz, jew l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jiġi identifikat l-istat emozzjonali ta' individwi f'sitwazzjonijiet relatati mal-post tax-xogħol u mal-edukazzjoni jiġu pprojbiti. Jenħtieġ li dik il-projbizzjoni ma tkoprix is-sistemi tal-IA introdotti fis-suq strettament għal raġunijiet mediċi jew ta' sikurezza, bħal sistemi maħsuba għal użu terapewtiku.
(44)
There are serious concerns about the scientific basis of AI systems aiming to identify or infer emotions, particularly as expression of emotions vary considerably across cultures and situations, and even within a single individual. Among the key shortcomings of such systems are the limited reliability, the lack of specificity and the limited generalisability. Therefore, AI systems identifying or inferring emotions or intentions of natural persons on the basis of their biometric data may lead to discriminatory outcomes and can be intrusive to the rights and freedoms of the concerned persons. Considering the imbalance of power in the context of work or education, combined with the intrusive nature of these systems, such systems could lead to detrimental or unfavourable treatment of certain natural persons or whole groups thereof. Therefore, the placing on the market, the putting into service, or the use of AI systems intended to be used to detect the emotional state of individuals in situations related to the workplace and education should be prohibited. That prohibition should not cover AI systems placed on the market strictly for medical or safety reasons, such as systems intended for therapeutical use.
(45)
Jenħtieġ li l-prattiki li huma pprojbiti mil-liġi tal-Unjoni, inkluż il-liġi dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data, il-liġi dwar in-nondiskriminazzjoni, il-liġi dwar il-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur, u l-liġi tal-kompetizzjoni, ma jiġux affettwati minn dan ir-Regolament.
(45)
Practices that are prohibited by Union law, including data protection law, non-discrimination law, consumer protection law, and competition law, should not be affected by this Regulation.
(46)
Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jiġu introdotti fis-suq tal-Unjoni, jitqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jintużaw biss jekk ikunu konformi ma' ċerti rekwiżiti obbligatorji. Jenħtieġ li dawk ir-rekwiżiti jiżguraw li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli disponibbli fl-Unjoni jew li l-output tagħhom jintuża b'xi mod ieħor fl-Unjoni ma jkunux joħolqu riskji inaċċettabbli għal interessi pubbliċi importanti tal-Unjoni kif rikonoxxuti u mħarsa bil-liġi tal-Unjoni. Abbażi tal-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid, kif iċċarat fl-avviż tal-Kummissjoni “‘Il-Gwida Blu’ dwar l-implimentazzjoni tar-regoli tal-prodotti tal-UE tal-2022” (20), ir-regola ġenerali hija li aktar minn att legali wieħed tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni, bħar-Regolamenti (UE) 2017/745 (21) u (UE) 2017/746 (22) tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill jew id-Direttiva 2006/42/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (23), jista' jkun applikabbli għal prodott wieħed, peress li l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz jista' jseħħ biss meta l-prodott jikkonforma mal-leġiżlazzjoni applikabbli kollha tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni. Sabiex tiġi żgurata l-konsistenza u jiġu evitati piżijiet jew kostijiet amministrattivi bla bżonn, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' prodott li jkun fih sistemi ta' IA b'riskju għoli waħda jew aktar, li għalihom japplikaw ir-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament u tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, ikollhom flessibbiltà fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet operazzjonali dwar kif tiġi żgurata l-konformità ta' prodott li jkun fih sistema tal-IA waħda jew aktar mar-rekwiżiti applikabbli kollha tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bl-aħjar mod. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA identifikati bħala b'riskju għoli jkunu limitati għal dawk li għandhom impatt dannuż sinifikanti fuq is-saħħa, is-sikurezza u d-drittijiet fundamentali tal-persuni fl-Unjoni u din il-limitazzjoni jenħtieġ li timminimizza kwalunkwe restrizzjoni potenzjali fuq il-kummerċ internazzjonali.
(46)
High-risk AI systems should only be placed on the Union market, put into service or used if they comply with certain mandatory requirements. Those requirements should ensure that high-risk AI systems available in the Union or whose output is otherwise used in the Union do not pose unacceptable risks to important Union public interests as recognised and protected by Union law. On the basis of the New Legislative Framework, as clarified in the Commission notice ‘The “Blue Guide” on the implementation of EU product rules 2022’ (20), the general rule is that more than one legal act of Union harmonisation legislation, such as Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (21) and (EU) 2017/746 (22) of the European Parliament and of the Council or Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (23), may be applicable to one product, since the making available or putting into service can take place only when the product complies with all applicable Union harmonisation legislation. To ensure consistency and avoid unnecessary administrative burdens or costs, providers of a product that contains one or more high-risk AI systems, to which the requirements of this Regulation and of the Union harmonisation legislation listed in an annex to this Regulation apply, should have flexibility with regard to operational decisions on how to ensure compliance of a product that contains one or more AI systems with all applicable requirements of the Union harmonisation legislation in an optimal manner. AI systems identified as high-risk should be limited to those that have a significant harmful impact on the health, safety and fundamental rights of persons in the Union and such limitation should minimise any potential restriction to international trade.
(47)
Is-sistemi tal-IA jista' jkollhom impatt negattiv fuq is-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni, b'mod partikolari meta dawn is-sistemi jaħdmu bħala komponenti tas-sikurezza tal-prodotti. B'mod konsistenti mal-objettivi tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni biex jiġi ffaċilitat il-moviment liberu tal-prodotti fis-suq intern u biex ikun żgurat li prodotti sikuri u konformi b'xi mod ieħor biss jitqiegħdu fis-suq, hu importanti li jiġu evitati u mitigati kif xieraq ir-riskji għas-sikurezza li jistgħu jiġu ġġenerati minn prodott sħiħ minħabba l-komponenti diġitali tiegħu, inkluż sistemi tal-IA. Pereżempju, jenħtieġ li r-robots dejjem aktar awtonomi, sew fil-kuntest tal-manifattura kif ukoll fil-kuntest tal-assistenza u l-kura personali, ikunu jistgħu joperaw u jwettqu l-funzjonijiet tagħhom mingħajr periklu f'ambjenti kumplessi. Bl-istess mod, fis-settur tas-saħħa fejn l-interessi għall-ħajja u għas-saħħa huma partikolarment għoljin, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi dijanjostiċi dejjem aktar sofistikati u s-sistemi li jappoġġaw id-deċiżjonijiet umani jkunu affidabbli u preċiżi.
(47)
AI systems could have an adverse impact on the health and safety of persons, in particular when such systems operate as safety components of products. Consistent with the objectives of Union harmonisation legislation to facilitate the free movement of products in the internal market and to ensure that only safe and otherwise compliant products find their way into the market, it is important that the safety risks that may be generated by a product as a whole due to its digital components, including AI systems, are duly prevented and mitigated. For instance, increasingly autonomous robots, whether in the context of manufacturing or personal assistance and care should be able to safely operate and performs their functions in complex environments. Similarly, in the health sector where the stakes for life and health are particularly high, increasingly sophisticated diagnostics systems and systems supporting human decisions should be reliable and accurate.
(48)
Il-firxa tal-impatt negattiv ikkawżat mis-sistema tal-IA fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali protetti mill-Karta għandha rilevanza partikolari meta sistema tal-IA tkun qed tiġi klassifikata li għandha riskju għoli. Dawk id-drittijiet jinkludu d-dritt għad-dinjità tal-bniedem, ir-rispett għall-ħajja privata u tal-familja, il-protezzjoni tad-data personali, il-libertà tal-espressjoni u tal-informazzjoni, il-libertà ta' għaqda u ta' assoċjazzjoni, id-dritt għan-nondiskriminazzjoni, id-dritt għall-edukazzjoni, il-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur, id-drittijiet tal-ħaddiema, id-drittijiet tal-persuni b'diżabbiltà, l-ugwaljanza bejn il-ġeneri, id-drittijiet ta' proprjetà intellettwali, id-dritt għal rimedju effettiv u għal proċess imparzjali, id-dritt għad-difiża u l-preżunzjoni ta' innoċenza, u d-dritt għal amministrazzjoni tajba. Minbarra dawk id-drittijiet, hu importanti li jiġi enfasizzat il-fatt li t-tfal għandhom drittijiet speċifiċi kif minqux fl-Artikolu 24 tal-Karta u fil-Konvenzjoni tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti dwar id-Drittijiet tat-Tfal, żviluppata aktar fil-Kumment Ġenerali Nru 25 tal-UNCRC fir-rigward tal-ambjent diġitali, li t-tnejn li huma jirrikjedu kunsiderazzjoni tal-vulnerabbiltajiet tat-tfal u l-għoti ta' tali protezzjoni u kura kif meħtieġ għall-benesseri tagħhom. Jenħtieġ li d-dritt fundamentali għal livell għoli ta' protezzjoni ambjentali, kif minqux fil-Karta u implimentat fil-politiki tal-Unjoni, jitqies ukoll meta tkun qed tiġi vvalutata s-severità tad-dannu li sistema tal-IA tista' tikkawża, inkluż fir-rigward tas-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni.
(48)
The extent of the adverse impact caused by the AI system on the fundamental rights protected by the Charter is of particular relevance when classifying an AI system as high risk. Those rights include the right to human dignity, respect for private and family life, protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information, freedom of assembly and of association, the right to non-discrimination, the right to education, consumer protection, workers’ rights, the rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality, intellectual property rights, the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, the right of defence and the presumption of innocence, and the right to good administration. In addition to those rights, it is important to highlight the fact that children have specific rights as enshrined in Article 24 of the Charter and in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, further developed in the UNCRC General Comment No 25 as regards the digital environment, both of which require consideration of the children’s vulnerabilities and provision of such protection and care as necessary for their well-being. The fundamental right to a high level of environmental protection enshrined in the Charter and implemented in Union policies should also be considered when assessing the severity of the harm that an AI system can cause, including in relation to the health and safety of persons.
(49)
Fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma komponenti tas-sikurezza tal-prodotti jew tas-sistemi, jew li huma stess huma prodotti jew sistemi li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 300/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (24), ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 167/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (25), ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 168/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (26), id-Direttiva 2014/90/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (27), id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/797 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (28), ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/858 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (29), ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1139 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (30), u r-Regolament (UE) 2019/2144 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (31), huwa xieraq li dawk l-atti jiġu emendati biex jiġi żgurat li l-Kummissjoni tqis, abbażi tal-ispeċifiċitajiet tekniċi u regolatorji ta' kull settur, u mingħajr ma tinterferixxi mal-governanza, il-valutazzjoni tal-konformità u l-mekkaniżmi ta' infurzar eżistenti u l-awtoritajiet stabbiliti fih, ir-rekwiżiti obbligatorji għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament meta tadotta kwalunkwe att delegat jew ta' implimentazzjoni rilevanti abbażi ta' dawk l-atti.
(49)
As regards high-risk AI systems that are safety components of products or systems, or which are themselves products or systems falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (24), Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (25), Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (26), Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (27), Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council (28), Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council (29), Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council (30), and Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council (31), it is appropriate to amend those acts to ensure that the Commission takes into account, on the basis of the technical and regulatory specificities of each sector, and without interfering with existing governance, conformity assessment and enforcement mechanisms and authorities established therein, the mandatory requirements for high-risk AI systems laid down in this Regulation when adopting any relevant delegated or implementing acts on the basis of those acts.
(50)
Fir-rigward ta' sistemi tal-IA li huma komponenti tas-sikurezza ta' prodotti, jew li huma stess ikunu prodotti, li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' ċerta leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata f’anness ta’ dan ir-Regolament, jixraq li jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament jekk il-prodott ikkonċernat jgħaddi mill-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità mwettqa minn korp terz ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità skont dik il-leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni. B'mod partikolari, dawn il-prodotti huma makkinarju, ġugarelli, liftijiet, tagħmir u sistemi protettivi maħsuba għal użu f'ambjenti potenzjalment esplożivi, f'tagħmir tar-radju, apparat tal-pressa, tagħmir ta' opri tal-baħar għar-rikreazzjoni, installazzjonijiet tal-funikular, apparati li jaħarqu fjuwils gassużi, apparati mediċi, apparati mediċi dijanjostiċi in vitro, karozzi u avjazzjoni.
(50)
As regards AI systems that are safety components of products, or which are themselves products, falling within the scope of certain Union harmonisation legislation listed in an annex to this Regulation, it is appropriate to classify them as high-risk under this Regulation if the product concerned undergoes the conformity assessment procedure with a third-party conformity assessment body pursuant to that relevant Union harmonisation legislation. In particular, such products are machinery, toys, lifts, equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres, radio equipment, pressure equipment, recreational craft equipment, cableway installations, appliances burning gaseous fuels, medical devices, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, automotive and aviation.
(51)
Jenħtieġ li l-klassifikazzjoni ta' sistema tal-IA bħala li għandha riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament mhux bilfors tkun tfisser li l-prodott li l-komponent tas-sikurezza tiegħu jkun is-sistema tal-IA, jew is-sistema tal-IA stess bħala prodott, jitqiesu li huma b'“riskju għoli” skont il-kriterji stabbiliti fil-leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni li tapplika għall-prodott. B'mod partikolari, dan huwa l-każ għar-Regolamenti (UE) 2017/745 u (UE) 2017/746, fejn tiġi pprovduta valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn parti terza għal prodotti b'riskju medju u b'riskju għoli.
(51)
The classification of an AI system as high-risk pursuant to this Regulation should not necessarily mean that the product whose safety component is the AI system, or the AI system itself as a product, is considered to be high-risk under the criteria established in the relevant Union harmonisation legislation that applies to the product. This is, in particular, the case for Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746, where a third-party conformity assessment is provided for medium-risk and high-risk products.
(52)
Fir-rigward ta' sistemi awtonomi tal-IA, jiġifieri sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli minbarra dawk li huma komponenti tas-sikurezza tal-prodotti, jew li huma stess ikunu prodotti, jixraq li jiġu klassifikati bħala b’riskju għoli jekk, fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tagħhom, dawn jippreżentaw riskju għoli ta’ ħsara għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali tal-persuni, filwaqt li jitqiesu kemm is-severità tal-ħsara possibbli u l-probabbiltà li din isseħħ, u jintużaw f’għadd ta’ oqsma speċifikament definiti minn qabel speċifikati f’dan ir-Regolament. L-identifikazzjoni ta’ dawk is-sistemi hija bbażata fuq l-istess metodoloġija u kriterji previsti wkoll għal kull emenda futura tal-lista tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tingħata s-setgħa li tadotta, permezz ta’ atti delegati, biex jitqies il-pass rapidu tal-iżvilupp teknoloġiku, kif ukoll il-bidliet potenzjali fl-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA.
(52)
As regards stand-alone AI systems, namely high-risk AI systems other than those that are safety components of products, or that are themselves products, it is appropriate to classify them as high-risk if, in light of their intended purpose, they pose a high risk of harm to the health and safety or the fundamental rights of persons, taking into account both the severity of the possible harm and its probability of occurrence and they are used in a number of specifically pre-defined areas specified in this Regulation. The identification of those systems is based on the same methodology and criteria envisaged also for any future amendments of the list of high-risk AI systems that the Commission should be empowered to adopt, via delegated acts, to take into account the rapid pace of technological development, as well as the potential changes in the use of AI systems.
(53)
Huwa importanti wkoll li jiġi ċċarat li jista’ jkun hemm każijiet speċifiċi li fihom is-sistemi tal-IA msemmija f’oqsma predefiniti speċifikati f’dan ir-Regolament ma jwasslux għal riskju sinifikanti ta’ ħsara għall-interessi legali protetti f’dawk l-oqsma minħabba li ma jinfluwenzawx materjalment it-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet jew ma jagħmlux ħsara sostanzjali lil dawk l-interessi. Għall-finijiet ta’ dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li sistema tal-IA li ma tinfluwenzax materjalment l-eżitu tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet tinftiehem li tkun sistema tal-IA li ma jkollhiex impatt fuq is-sustanza, u b’hekk fuq l-eżitu, tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet, kemm jekk ikun mill-bniedem kif ukoll jekk awtomatizzat. Sistema tal-IA li ma tinfluwenzax materjalment l-eżitu tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet tista’ tinkludi sitwazzjonijiet li fihom tiġi ssodisfata waħda jew aktar mill-kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin. L-ewwel tali kundizzjoni jenħtieġ li tkun li s-sistema tal-IA tkun maħsuba biex twettaq kompitu proċedurali ristrett, bħal sistema tal-IA li tittrasforma data mhux strutturata f’data strutturata, sistema tal-IA li tikklassifika dokumenti li jkunu deħlin f’kategoriji jew sistema tal-IA li tintuża biex jiġu identifikati duplikati fost għadd kbir ta’ applikazzjonijiet. Dawk il-kompiti huma ta’ natura tant ristretta u limitata li joħolqu biss riskji limitati li ma jiżdidux permezz tal-użu ta’ sistema tal-IA f'kuntest li huwa elenkat bħala użu b'riskju għoli f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament. It-tieni kundizzjoni jenħtieġ li tkun li l-kompitu mwettaq mis-sistema tal-IA jkun maħsub biex itejjeb ir-riżultat ta' attività tal-bniedem li tkun tlestiet qabel li tista' tkun rilevanti għall-finijiet tal-użi b’riskju għoli elenkati f’anness ta’ dan ir-Regolament. Meta jitqiesu dawk il-karatteristiċi, is-sistema tal-IA tipprovdi biss saff addizzjonali għal attività tal-bniedem bil-konsegwenza li r-riskju jkun imnaqqas. Dik il-kundizzjoni tkun tapplika, pereżempju, għal sistemi tal-IA li huma maħsuba biex itejbu l-lingwa użata f'dokumenti diġà abbozzati, pereżempju fir-rigward tat-ton professjonali, l-istil akkademiku tal-lingwa jew billi t-test jiġi allinjat mal-messaġġ li tkun trid twassal marka partikolari. It-tielet kundizzjoni jenħtieġ li tkun li s-sistema tal-IA tkun maħsuba biex tidentifika xejriet ta' teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet jew devjazzjonijiet minn xejriet ta' teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet preċedenti. Ir-riskju jitnaqqas minħabba li l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA jsegwi valutazzjoni mill-bniedem li tkun tlestiet qabel li ma tkunx maħsuba biex tissostitwixxi jew tinfluwenza, mingħajr rieżami xieraq mill-bniedem. Tali sistemi tal-IA jinkludu pereżempju dawk li, minħabba ċertu tendenzi fl-għoti tal-marki minn għalliem, jistgħu jintużaw biex jiġi vverifikat ex post jekk l-għalliem setax iddevja mit-tendenzi fl-għoti tal-marki sabiex jiġu mmarkati inkonsistenzi jew anomaliji potenzjali. Ir-raba' kundizzjoni jenħtieġ li tkun li s-sistema tal-IA tkun maħsuba biex twettaq kompitu li jkun biss preparatorju għal valutazzjoni rilevanti għall-finijiet tas-sistemi tal-IA elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, u b'hekk ikun hemm riskju baxx ħafna li l-impatt possibbli tal-output tas-sistema ser jippreżenta xi riskju għall-valutazzjoni li ssegwi. Dik il-kundizzjoni tkopri, fost l-oħrajn, soluzzjonijiet intelliġenti għat-trattament tal-fajls, li jinkludu diversi funzjonijiet mill-indiċjar, it-tiftix, l-ipproċessar tat-test u tad-diskors jew il-kollegament tad-data ma' sorsi oħra ta' data, jew sistemi tal-IA użati għat-traduzzjoni ta' dokumenti inizjali. Fi kwalunkwe każ, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA użati f’każijiet ta’ użu b'riskju għoli elenkati f’anness ta’ dan ir-Regolament jitqiesu li joħolqu riskji sinifikanti ta' ħsara għas-saħħa, għas-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali jekk is-sistema tal-IA timplika tfassil ta' profili skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 4, il-punt (4) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 jew l-Artikolu 3, il-punt (4) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 jew l-Artikolu 3, il-punt (5) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725. Biex jiġu żgurati t-traċċabbiltà u t-trasparenza, jenħtieġ li fornitur li jqis li sistema tal-IA mhijiex b'riskju għoli abbażi ta' dawk il-kundizzjonijiet imsemmija hawn fuq ifassal dokumentazzjoni tal-valutazzjoni qabel ma dik is-sistema tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz u jenħtieġ li jipprovdi dik id-dokumentazzjoni lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti fuq talba. Jenħtieġ li tali fornitur ikun obbligat jirreġistra s-sistema tal-IA fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE stabbilita skont dan ir-Regolament. Bil-ħsieb li tiġi pprovduta gwida ulterjuri għall-implimentazzjoni prattika tal-kundizzjonijiet li skonthom is-sistemi tal-IA elenkati f’anness ta’ dan ir-Regolament huma, fuq bażi eċċezzjonali, mhux b'riskju għoli, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni, wara li tikkonsulta lill-Bord, tipprovdi linji gwida li jispeċifikaw dik l-implimentazzjoni prattika kkompletata b'lista komprensiva ta' eżempji prattiċi ta' każijiet ta' użu ta' sistemi tal-IA li huma b'riskju għoli u każijiet ta’ użu li mhumiex.
(53)
It is also important to clarify that there may be specific cases in which AI systems referred to in pre-defined areas specified in this Regulation do not lead to a significant risk of harm to the legal interests protected under those areas because they do not materially influence the decision-making or do not harm those interests substantially. For the purposes of this Regulation, an AI system that does not materially influence the outcome of decision-making should be understood to be an AI system that does not have an impact on the substance, and thereby the outcome, of decision-making, whether human or automated. An AI system that does not materially influence the outcome of decision-making could include situations in which one or more of the following conditions are fulfilled. The first such condition should be that the AI system is intended to perform a narrow procedural task, such as an AI system that transforms unstructured data into structured data, an AI system that classifies incoming documents into categories or an AI system that is used to detect duplicates among a large number of applications. Those tasks are of such narrow and limited nature that they pose only limited risks which are not increased through the use of an AI system in a context that is listed as a high-risk use in an annex to this Regulation. The second condition should be that the task performed by the AI system is intended to improve the result of a previously completed human activity that may be relevant for the purposes of the high-risk uses listed in an annex to this Regulation. Considering those characteristics, the AI system provides only an additional layer to a human activity with consequently lowered risk. That condition would, for example, apply to AI systems that are intended to improve the language used in previously drafted documents, for example in relation to professional tone, academic style of language or by aligning text to a certain brand messaging. The third condition should be that the AI system is intended to detect decision-making patterns or deviations from prior decision-making patterns. The risk would be lowered because the use of the AI system follows a previously completed human assessment which it is not meant to replace or influence, without proper human review. Such AI systems include for instance those that, given a certain grading pattern of a teacher, can be used to check ex post whether the teacher may have deviated from the grading pattern so as to flag potential inconsistencies or anomalies. The fourth condition should be that the AI system is intended to perform a task that is only preparatory to an assessment relevant for the purposes of the AI systems listed in an annex to this Regulation, thus making the possible impact of the output of the system very low in terms of representing a risk for the assessment to follow. That condition covers, inter alia, smart solutions for file handling, which include various functions from indexing, searching, text and speech processing or linking data to other data sources, or AI systems used for translation of initial documents. In any case, AI systems used in high-risk use-cases listed in an annex to this Regulation should be considered to pose significant risks of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights if the AI system implies profiling within the meaning of Article 4, point (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Article 3, point (4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 or Article 3, point (5) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. To ensure traceability and transparency, a provider who considers that an AI system is not high-risk on the basis of the conditions referred to above should draw up documentation of the assessment before that system is placed on the market or put into service and should provide that documentation to national competent authorities upon request. Such a provider should be obliged to register the AI system in the EU database established under this Regulation. With a view to providing further guidance for the practical implementation of the conditions under which the AI systems listed in an annex to this Regulation are, on an exceptional basis, non-high-risk, the Commission should, after consulting the Board, provide guidelines specifying that practical implementation, completed by a comprehensive list of practical examples of use cases of AI systems that are high-risk and use cases that are not.
(54)
Peress li d-data bijometrika tikkostitwixxi kategorija speċjali ta' data personali, huwa xieraq li diversi każijiet ta' użu kritiku tas-sistemi bijometriċi jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli, sa fejn l-użu tagħhom ikun permess skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni u dik nazzjonali. L-inakkuratezzi tekniċi tas-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota ta' persuni fiżiċi jistgħu jwasslu għal riżultati preġudikati u jħallu effetti diskriminatorji. Ir-riskju ta' tali riżultati preġudikati u effetti diskriminatorji huma partikolarment rilevanti fir-rigward tal-età, l-etniċità, ir-razza, is-sess jew id-diżabilitajiet. Jenħtieġ għalhekk li s-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli fid-dawl tar-riskji li jippreżentaw. Tali klassifikazzjoni teskludi sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-verifika bijometrika, inkluż l-awtentikazzjoni, li l-iskop uniku tagħha huwa li tikkonferma li persuna fiżika speċifika hija l-persuna li dik il-persuna tiddikjara li hija u li tikkonferma l-identità ta' persuna fiżika għall-iskop uniku li jkollha aċċess għal servizz, li tiftaħ apparat jew li jkollha aċċess sigur għall-bini. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA bbażati fuq data bijometrika maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika skont attributi jew karatteristiċi sensittivi protetti skont l-Artikolu 9(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, sakemm dawn ma jkunux ipprojbiti skont dan ir-Regolament, u s-sistemi ta' rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet li mhumiex ipprojbiti skont dan ir-Regolament, jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi bijometriċi li huma maħsuba li jintużaw biss għall-fini li jippermettu ċ-ċibersigurtà u l-miżuri tal-protezzjoni tad-data personali ma jitqisux li jkunu sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli.
(54)
As biometric data constitutes a special category of personal data, it is appropriate to classify as high-risk several critical-use cases of biometric systems, insofar as their use is permitted under relevant Union and national law. Technical inaccuracies of AI systems intended for the remote biometric identification of natural persons can lead to biased results and entail discriminatory effects. The risk of such biased results and discriminatory effects is particularly relevant with regard to age, ethnicity, race, sex or disabilities. Remote biometric identification systems should therefore be classified as high-risk in view of the risks that they pose. Such a classification excludes AI systems intended to be used for biometric verification, including authentication, the sole purpose of which is to confirm that a specific natural person is who that person claims to be and to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, unlocking a device or having secure access to premises. In addition, AI systems intended to be used for biometric categorisation according to sensitive attributes or characteristics protected under Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the basis of biometric data, in so far as these are not prohibited under this Regulation, and emotion recognition systems that are not prohibited under this Regulation, should be classified as high-risk. Biometric systems which are intended to be used solely for the purpose of enabling cybersecurity and personal data protection measures should not be considered to be high-risk AI systems.
(55)
Fir-rigward tal-ġestjoni u t-tħaddim tal-infrastruttura kritika, jixraq li s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw bħala komponenti tas-sikurezza fil-ġestjoni u t-tħaddim tal-infrastruttura diġitali kritika kif elenkat fil-punt (8) tal-Anness tad-Direttiva (UE) 2022/2557, tat-traffiku tat-triq u fil-provvista tal-ilma, tal-gass, tat-tisħin u tal-elettriku jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli, għax il-falliment jew il-funzjonament ħażin tagħhom jistgħu jqiegħdu f'riskju l-ħajja u s-saħħa tal-persuni fuq skala kbira u jwasslu għal tfixkil sinifikanti fl-eżekuzzjoni ordinarja tal-attivitajiet soċjali u ekonomiċi. Il-komponenti tas-sikurezza tal-infrastruttura kritika, inkluż l-infrastruttura diġitali kritika, huma sistemi użati biex jipproteġu direttament l-integrità fiżika tal-infrastruttura kritika jew is-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni u l-proprjetà iżda li mhumiex meħtieġa sabiex is-sistema tiffunzjona. Il-falliment jew il-funzjonament ħażin ta' tali komponenti jista' jwassal direttament għal riskji għall-integrità fiżika tal-infrastruttura kritika u b'hekk għal riskji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni u l-proprjetà. Jenħtieġ li l-komponenti maħsuba biex jintużaw biss għal finijiet taċ-ċibersigurtà ma jikkwalifikawx bħala komponenti ta' sikurezza. Eżempji ta' komponenti ta' sikurezza ta' tali infrastruttura kritika jistgħu jinkludu sistemi għall-monitoraġġ tas-sistemi ta' kontroll tal-pressjoni tal-ilma jew tal-allarm tan-nar fiċ-ċentri tal-cloud computing.
(55)
As regards the management and operation of critical infrastructure, it is appropriate to classify as high-risk the AI systems intended to be used as safety components in the management and operation of critical digital infrastructure as listed in point (8) of the Annex to Directive (EU) 2022/2557, road traffic and the supply of water, gas, heating and electricity, since their failure or malfunctioning may put at risk the life and health of persons at large scale and lead to appreciable disruptions in the ordinary conduct of social and economic activities. Safety components of critical infrastructure, including critical digital infrastructure, are systems used to directly protect the physical integrity of critical infrastructure or the health and safety of persons and property but which are not necessary in order for the system to function. The failure or malfunctioning of such components might directly lead to risks to the physical integrity of critical infrastructure and thus to risks to health and safety of persons and property. Components intended to be used solely for cybersecurity purposes should not qualify as safety components. Examples of safety components of such critical infrastructure may include systems for monitoring water pressure or fire alarm controlling systems in cloud computing centres.
(56)
L-implimentazzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA fl-edukazzjoni huwa importanti biex jiġu promossi l-edukazzjoni u t-taħriġ diġitali ta' kwalità għolja u biex l-istudenti u l-għalliema kollha jkunu jistgħu jiksbu u jikkondividu l-ħiliet u l-kompetenzi diġitali meħtieġa, inkluż il-litteriżmu fil-media, u l-ħsieb kritiku, biex jieħdu sehem attiv fl-ekonomija, fis-soċjetà, u fil-proċessi demokratiċi. Madankollu, is-sistemi tal-IA użati fl-edukazzjoni jew fit-taħriġ vokazzjonali, b'mod partikolari għad-determinazzjoni tal-aċċess jew l-ammissjoni, għall-assenjazzjoni ta' persuni lil istituzzjonijiet jew programmi edukattivi u ta' taħriġ vokazzjonali fil-livelli kollha, għall-evalwazzjoni tal-eżiti tal-apprendiment tal-persuni, għall-valutazzjoni tal-livell xieraq ta' edukazzjoni għal individwu u li materjalment jinfluwenzaw il-livell ta' edukazzjoni u taħriġ li l-individwi ser jirċievu jew ser ikunu jistgħu jaċċessaw jew għall-monitoraġġ u għad-detezzjoni ta' mġiba pprojbita tal-istudenti matul it-testijiet jenħtieġ li jiġu kklassifikati bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, għax jistgħu jiddeterminaw il-kors edukattiv u professjonali tal-ħajja ta' persuna u għalhekk jistgħu jaffettwaw l-abbiltà ta' dik il-persuna li tiżgura l-għajxien. Meta jitfasslu u jintużaw b'mod mhux xieraq, dawn is-sistemi jistgħu jkunu partikolarment intrużivi u jistgħu jiksru d-dritt għal edukazzjoni u taħriġ kif ukoll id-dritt ta' nondiskriminazzjoni, u jipperpetwaw mudelli storiċi ta' diskriminazzjoni, pereżempju kontra n-nisa, ċerti gruppi ta' età, persuni b'diżabbiltà, jew persuni ta' ċerta oriġini razzjali jew etnika jew orjentazzjoni sesswali.
(56)
The deployment of AI systems in education is important to promote high-quality digital education and training and to allow all learners and teachers to acquire and share the necessary digital skills and competences, including media literacy, and critical thinking, to take an active part in the economy, society, and in democratic processes. However, AI systems used in education or vocational training, in particular for determining access or admission, for assigning persons to educational and vocational training institutions or programmes at all levels, for evaluating learning outcomes of persons, for assessing the appropriate level of education for an individual and materially influencing the level of education and training that individuals will receive or will be able to access or for monitoring and detecting prohibited behaviour of students during tests should be classified as high-risk AI systems, since they may determine the educational and professional course of a person’s life and therefore may affect that person’s ability to secure a livelihood. When improperly designed and used, such systems may be particularly intrusive and may violate the right to education and training as well as the right not to be discriminated against and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example against women, certain age groups, persons with disabilities, or persons of certain racial or ethnic origins or sexual orientation.
(57)
Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA użati fl-impjiegi, fil-ġestjoni tal-ħaddiema u fl-aċċess għal impjieg indipendenti, b'mod partikolari għar-reklutaġġ u għall-għażla tal-persuni, għat-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet li jaffettwaw it-termini tar-relazzjonijiet marbuta max-xogħol, il-promozzjoni u t-terminazzjoni ta' relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali relatati max-xogħol, għall-allokazzjoni ta' kompiti abbażi tal-imġiba individwali, il-kwalitajiet jew il-karatteristiċi personali u għall-monitoraġġ jew l-evalwazzjoni ta' persuni f'relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali relatati max-xogħol, jiġu kklassifikati wkoll bħala b'riskju għoli, peress li dawk is-sistemi jista' jkollhom impatt sinifikanti fuq il-prospetti futuri tal-karriera, l-għajxien ta' dawk il-persuni u d-drittijiet tal-ħaddiema. Jenħtieġ li r-relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali rilevanti relatati max-xogħol ikunu jinvolvu b'mod sinifikattiv lill-impjegati u lill-persuni li jipprovdu servizzi permezz ta' pjattaformi kif imsemmi fil-Programm ta' Ħidma tal-Kummissjoni għall-2021. Tul il-proċess kollu tar-reklutaġġ u fl-evalwazzjoni, fil-promozzjoni, jew fiż-żamma ta' persuni f'relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali relatati max-xogħol, dawn is-sistemi jistgħu jipperpetwaw mudelli storiċi ta' diskriminazzjoni, pereżempju kontra n-nisa, ċerti gruppi ta' età, persuni b'diżabbiltà, jew persuni ta' ċerta oriġini razzjali jew etnika jew orjentazzjoni sesswali. Is-sistemi tal-IA użati għall-monitoraġġ tal-prestazzjoni u tal-imġiba ta' tali persuni jistgħu jdgħajfu wkoll id-drittijiet fundamentali tagħhom għall-protezzjoni tad-data u l-privatezza.
(57)
AI systems used in employment, workers management and access to self-employment, in particular for the recruitment and selection of persons, for making decisions affecting terms of the work-related relationship, promotion and termination of work-related contractual relationships, for allocating tasks on the basis of individual behaviour, personal traits or characteristics and for monitoring or evaluation of persons in work-related contractual relationships, should also be classified as high-risk, since those systems may have an appreciable impact on future career prospects, livelihoods of those persons and workers’ rights. Relevant work-related contractual relationships should, in a meaningful manner, involve employees and persons providing services through platforms as referred to in the Commission Work Programme 2021. Throughout the recruitment process and in the evaluation, promotion, or retention of persons in work-related contractual relationships, such systems may perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example against women, certain age groups, persons with disabilities, or persons of certain racial or ethnic origins or sexual orientation. AI systems used to monitor the performance and behaviour of such persons may also undermine their fundamental rights to data protection and privacy.
(58)
Qasam ieħor li fih l-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA jixirqilhom kunsiderazzjoni speċjali hu l-aċċess għal ċerti servizzi u benefiċċji privati u pubbliċi essenzjali u t-tgawdija ta' dawn is-servizzi u l-benefiċċji meħtieġa biex in-nies jipparteċipaw bis-sħiħ fis-soċjetà jew biex itejbu l-istandard tal-għajxien tagħhom. B'mod partikolari, il-persuni fiżiċi li japplikaw għal jew li jirċievu benefiċċji u servizzi essenzjali ta' assistenza pubblika mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi, jiġifieri s-servizzi tal-kura tas-saħħa, il-benefiċċji tas-sigurtà soċjali, is-servizzi soċjali li jipprovdu protezzjoni f'każijiet bħall-maternità, il-mard, l-inċidenti industrijali, id-dipendenza jew ix-xjuħija u t-telf tal-impjieg u l-assistenza soċjali u tal-akkomodazzjoni, huma tipikament dipendenti fuq dawk il-benefiċċji u s-servizzi u f'pożizzjoni vulnerabbli fir-rigward tal-awtoritajiet responsabbli. Jekk is-sistemi tal-IA jintużaw biex jiġi determinat jekk dawn il-benefiċċji u s-servizzi għandhomx jingħataw, jiċċaħħdu, jitnaqqsu, jitneħħew jew jittieħdu lura mill-awtoritajiet, inkluż jekk il-benefiċjarji humiex leġittimament intitolati għal tali benefiċċji jew servizzi, dawk is-sistemi jista' jkollhom impatt sinifikanti fuq l-għajxien tal-persuni u jistgħu jiksru d-drittijiet fundamentali tagħhom, bħad-dritt għall-protezzjoni soċjali, id-dritt ta' nondiskriminazzjoni, għad-dinjità umana jew għal rimedju effettiv u għalhekk jenħtieġ li jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli. Madankollu, jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament ma jfixkilx l-iżvilupp u l-użu ta' approċċi innovattivi fl-amministrazzjoni pubblika, li jkunu jistgħu jibbenefikaw minn użu aktar mifrux ta' sistemi tal-IA konformi u sikuri, dment li dawk is-sistemi ma jkunux jinvolvu riskju għoli għall-persuni ġuridiċi u fiżiċi. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA użati biex jevalwaw il-kreditu jew għall-evalwazzjoni tal-affidabbiltà kreditizja ta' xi persuni fiżiċi jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli peress li jiddeterminaw l-aċċess ta' dawk il-persuni għal riżorsi finanzjarji jew għal servizzi essenzjali bħall-akkomodazzjoni, l-elettriku, u s-servizzi tat-telekomunikazzjoni. Is-sistemi tal-IA użati għal dawk il-finijiet jistgħu jwasslu għad-diskriminazzjoni bejn persuni jew gruppi u jistgħu jipperpetwaw mudelli storiċi ta' diskriminazzjoni, dħal dik ibbażati fuq l-oriġini razzjali jew etnika, il-ġeneru, id-diżabbiltà, l-età jew l-orjentazzjoni sesswali, jew jistgħu joħolqu forom ġodda ta' impatti diskriminatorji. Madankollu, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA previsti mil-liġi tal-Unjoni għall-fini li tiġi identifikata frodi fl-offerta ta' servizzi finanzjarji u għal finijiet prudenzjali biex jiġu kkalkulati r-rekwiżiti kapitali tal-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu u tal-impriżi tal-assigurazzjoni ma jitqisux li jkunu b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament. Barra minn hekk, is-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-valutazzjoni tar-riskju u l-ipprezzar fir-rigward ta' persuni fiżiċi għall-assigurazzjoni tas-saħħa u tal-ħajja jista' wkoll ikollhom impatt sinifikanti fuq l-għajxien tal-persuni u jekk ma jkunux imfassla, żviluppati u użati kif xieraq, jistgħu jiksru d-drittijiet fundamentali tagħhom u jistgħu jwasslu għal konsegwenzi serji għall-ħajja u għas-saħħa tan-nies, inkluż l-esklużjoni finanzjarja u d-diskriminazzjoni. Fl-aħħar nett, jenħtieġ li anki s-sistemi tal-IA użati biex jiġu evalwati u kklassifikati telefonati ta' emerġenza minn persuni fiżiċi jew biex tintbagħat jew tiġi stabbilita prijorità fid-dispaċċ ta' servizzi tal-ewwel rispons ta' emerġenza, inkluż mill-pulizija, mill-ħaddiema tat-tifi tan-nar u mill-għajnuna medika, kif ukoll tas-sistemi tat-triage tal-pazjenti fil-qasam tal-kura tas-saħħa ta' emerġenza, jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli għax dawn jieħdu deċiżjonijiet f'sitwazzjonijiet kritiċi ħafna għall-ħajja u għas-saħħa tal-persuni u għall-proprjetà tagħhom.
(58)
Another area in which the use of AI systems deserves special consideration is the access to and enjoyment of certain essential private and public services and benefits necessary for people to fully participate in society or to improve one’s standard of living. In particular, natural persons applying for or receiving essential public assistance benefits and services from public authorities namely healthcare services, social security benefits, social services providing protection in cases such as maternity, illness, industrial accidents, dependency or old age and loss of employment and social and housing assistance, are typically dependent on those benefits and services and in a vulnerable position in relation to the responsible authorities. If AI systems are used for determining whether such benefits and services should be granted, denied, reduced, revoked or reclaimed by authorities, including whether beneficiaries are legitimately entitled to such benefits or services, those systems may have a significant impact on persons’ livelihood and may infringe their fundamental rights, such as the right to social protection, non-discrimination, human dignity or an effective remedy and should therefore be classified as high-risk. Nonetheless, this Regulation should not hamper the development and use of innovative approaches in the public administration, which would stand to benefit from a wider use of compliant and safe AI systems, provided that those systems do not entail a high risk to legal and natural persons. In addition, AI systems used to evaluate the credit score or creditworthiness of natural persons should be classified as high-risk AI systems, since they determine those persons’ access to financial resources or essential services such as housing, electricity, and telecommunication services. AI systems used for those purposes may lead to discrimination between persons or groups and may perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, such as that based on racial or ethnic origins, gender, disabilities, age or sexual orientation, or may create new forms of discriminatory impacts. However, AI systems provided for by Union law for the purpose of detecting fraud in the offering of financial services and for prudential purposes to calculate credit institutions’ and insurance undertakings’ capital requirements should not be considered to be high-risk under this Regulation. Moreover, AI systems intended to be used for risk assessment and pricing in relation to natural persons for health and life insurance can also have a significant impact on persons’ livelihood and if not duly designed, developed and used, can infringe their fundamental rights and can lead to serious consequences for people’s life and health, including financial exclusion and discrimination. Finally, AI systems used to evaluate and classify emergency calls by natural persons or to dispatch or establish priority in the dispatching of emergency first response services, including by police, firefighters and medical aid, as well as of emergency healthcare patient triage systems, should also be classified as high-risk since they make decisions in very critical situations for the life and health of persons and their property.
(59)
Minħabba r-rwol u r-responsabbiltà tagħhom, l-azzjonijiet tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi li jinvolvu ċerti użi tas-sistemi tal-IA huma kkaratterizzati minn grad sinifikanti ta' żbilanċ fil-poter u jistgħu jwasslu għal sorveljanza, għal arrest jew għal ċaħda tal-libertà ta' persuna fiżika u għal impatti negattivi oħra fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali garantiti fil-Karta. B'mod partikolari, jekk is-sistema tal-IA ma tkunx imħarrġa b'data ta' kwalità għolja, ma tkunx tissodisfa rekwiżiti adegwati fir-rigward tal-prestazzjoni, l-akkuratezza jew ir-robustezza tagħha, jew ma tkunx imfassla u ttestjata kif xieraq qabel ma tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz b'xi mod ieħor, din tista' tindividwa persuni b'mod diskriminatorju jew b'mod skorrett jew inġust. Barra minn hekk, l-eżerċitar ta' drittijiet fundamentali proċedurali importanti, bħad-dritt għal rimedju effettiv u għal proċess ġust kif ukoll id-dritt għal difiża u l-preżunzjoni tal-innoċenza, jista' jiġi mfixkel meta, b'mod partikolari, dawn is-sistemi tal-IA ma jkunux trasparenti, spjegabbli u dokumentati biżżejjed. Għalhekk, sakemm l-użu tagħhom ikun permess skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni u dik nazzjonali, jixraq li xi sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw fil-kuntest tal-infurzar tal-liġi jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli, meta l-akkuratezza, l-affidabbiltà u t-trasparenza jkunu partikolarment importanti biex jiġu evitati impatti negattivi, tinżamm il-fiduċja pubblika u jiġu żgurati r-responsabbiltà u rimedju effettiv. Minħabba n-natura tal-attivitajiet u r-riskji relatati magħhom, jenħtieġ li dawk is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jinkludu b'mod partikolari s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw minn jew f'isem l-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni b'appoġġ għall-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi għall-valutazzjoni tar-riskju ta' persuna fiżika li ssir vittma ta' reati kriminali, bħal poligrafi u għodod simili, għall-evalwazzjoni tal-affidabbiltà tal-evidenza waqt investigazzjoni jew prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali, u, sa fejn mhux ipprojbit skont dan ir-Regolament, għall-valutazzjoni tar-riskju ta' persuna fiżika li twettaq reat jew twettaq reat mill-ġdid mhux biss abbażi tat-tfassil ta' profili ta' persuni fiżiċi jew tal-valutazzjoni tal-kwalitajiet u l-karatteristiċi tal-personalità jew l-imġiba kriminali fil-passat ta' persuni fiżiċi jew gruppi, għat-tfassil ta' profili matul il-kxif, l-investigazzjoni jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba speċifikament biex jintużaw għal proċedimenti amministrattivi mill-awtoritajiet tat-taxxa u tad-dwana kif ukoll mill-unitajiet tal-intelligence finanzjarja li jwettqu kompiti amministrattivi li janalizzaw l-informazzjoni skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni kontra l-ħasil tal-flus ma jiġux klassifikati bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli użati mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi għall-fini tal-prevenzjoni, il-kxif, l-investigazzjoni u l-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali. Jenħtieġ li l-użu tal-għodod tal-IA mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi u awtoritajiet rilevanti oħra ma jsirx fattur ta' inugwaljanza jew esklużjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-impatt tal-użu tal-għodod tal-IA fuq id-drittijiet tad-difiża tal-persuni suspettati ma jiġix injorat, b'mod partikolari d-diffikultà biex tinkiseb informazzjoni sinifikattiva dwar il-funzjonament ta' dawk is-sistemi u d-diffikultà li tirriżulta biex jiġu kkontestati r-riżultati tagħhom fil-qorti, b'mod partikolari minn persuni fiżiċi li qed jiġu investigati.
(59)
Given their role and responsibility, actions by law enforcement authorities involving certain uses of AI systems are characterised by a significant degree of power imbalance and may lead to surveillance, arrest or deprivation of a natural person’s liberty as well as other adverse impacts on fundamental rights guaranteed in the Charter. In particular, if the AI system is not trained with high-quality data, does not meet adequate requirements in terms of its performance, its accuracy or robustness, or is not properly designed and tested before being put on the market or otherwise put into service, it may single out people in a discriminatory or otherwise incorrect or unjust manner. Furthermore, the exercise of important procedural fundamental rights, such as the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial as well as the right of defence and the presumption of innocence, could be hampered, in particular, where such AI systems are not sufficiently transparent, explainable and documented. It is therefore appropriate to classify as high-risk, insofar as their use is permitted under relevant Union and national law, a number of AI systems intended to be used in the law enforcement context where accuracy, reliability and transparency is particularly important to avoid adverse impacts, retain public trust and ensure accountability and effective redress. In view of the nature of the activities and the risks relating thereto, those high-risk AI systems should include in particular AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices, or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for assessing the risk of a natural person to become a victim of criminal offences, as polygraphs and similar tools, for the evaluation of the reliability of evidence in in the course of investigation or prosecution of criminal offences, and, insofar as not prohibited under this Regulation, for assessing the risk of a natural person offending or reoffending not solely on the basis of the profiling of natural persons or the assessment of personality traits and characteristics or the past criminal behaviour of natural persons or groups, for profiling in the course of detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences. AI systems specifically intended to be used for administrative proceedings by tax and customs authorities as well as by financial intelligence units carrying out administrative tasks analysing information pursuant to Union anti-money laundering law should not be classified as high-risk AI systems used by law enforcement authorities for the purpose of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences. The use of AI tools by law enforcement and other relevant authorities should not become a factor of inequality, or exclusion. The impact of the use of AI tools on the defence rights of suspects should not be ignored, in particular the difficulty in obtaining meaningful information on the functioning of those systems and the resulting difficulty in challenging their results in court, in particular by natural persons under investigation.
(60)
Is-sistemi tal-IA użati fil-ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, tal-ażil u tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri jaffettwaw lil persuni li spiss ikunu f'pożizzjoni partikolarment vulnerabbli u li jiddependu fuq l-eżitu tal-azzjonijiet tal-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti. Għalhekk, l-akkuratezza, in-natura nondiskriminatorja u t-trasparenza tas-sistemi tal-IA użati f'dawk il-kuntesti huma partikolarment importanti biex ikun żgurat ir-rispett għad-drittijiet fundamentali tal-persuni affettwati, b'mod partikolari d-drittijiet tagħhom ta' moviment liberu, ta' nondiskriminazzjoni, ta' protezzjoni tal-ħajja privata u ta' data personali, ta' protezzjoni internazzjonali u ta' amministrazzjoni tajba. Għalhekk, sa fejn l-użu tagħhom ikun permess skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali, jixraq li jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw minn jew f'isem awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni inkarigati b'kompiti fl-oqsma tal-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-ġestjoni tal-kontroll tal-fruntieri, bħal pereżempju poligrafi u għodod simili, għall-valutazzjoni ta' ċerti riskji maħluqa minn persuni fiżiċi li jidħlu fit-territorju ta' Stat Membru jew li japplikaw għal viża jew ażil, biex jassistu lill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti għall-eżami, inkluż il-valutazzjoni relatata tal-affidabbiltà tal-evidenza, tal-applikazzjonijiet għall-ażil, tal-viża u tal-permessi ta' residenza u tal-ilmenti assoċjati fir-rigward tal-objettiv li tiġi stabbilita l-eliġibbiltà tal-persuni fiżiċi li japplikaw għal status, għall-fini tad-detezzjoni, ir-rikonoxximent jew l-identifikazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi fil-kuntest tal-ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-kontroll tal-fruntieri, bl-eċċezzjoni tal-verifika tad-dokumenti tal-ivvjaġġar. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA fil-qasam tal-ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, tal-ażil u tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri koperti b'dan ir-Regolament ikunu konformi mar-rekwiżiti proċedurali rilevanti stabbiliti mir-Regolament (KE) Nru 810/2009 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (32), mid-Direttiva 2013/32/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (33), u minn leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti oħra tal-Unjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA fil-ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, tal-ażil u tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, fl-ebda ċirkostanza, ma jintuża mill-Istati Membri jew mill-istituzzjonijiet, mill-korpi, mill-uffiċċji jew mill-aġenziji tal-Unjoni bħala mezz biex jevitaw l-obbligi internazzjonali tagħhom skont il-Konvenzjoni tan-NU dwar l-Istatus tar-Refuġjati magħmula f'Ġinevra fit-28 ta' Lulju 1951 kif emendata mill-Protokoll tal-31 ta' Jannar 1967. Jenħtieġ li lanqas ma jintużaw biex jinkiser il-prinċipju ta' non-refoulement, jew biex jiġu mċaħħda perkorsi legali sikuri u effettivi lejn it-territorju tal-Unjoni, inkluż id-dritt għall-protezzjoni internazzjonali.
(60)
AI systems used in migration, asylum and border control management affect persons who are often in particularly vulnerable position and who are dependent on the outcome of the actions of the competent public authorities. The accuracy, non-discriminatory nature and transparency of the AI systems used in those contexts are therefore particularly important to guarantee respect for the fundamental rights of the affected persons, in particular their rights to free movement, non-discrimination, protection of private life and personal data, international protection and good administration. It is therefore appropriate to classify as high-risk, insofar as their use is permitted under relevant Union and national law, AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies charged with tasks in the fields of migration, asylum and border control management as polygraphs and similar tools, for assessing certain risks posed by natural persons entering the territory of a Member State or applying for visa or asylum, for assisting competent public authorities for the examination, including related assessment of the reliability of evidence, of applications for asylum, visa and residence permits and associated complaints with regard to the objective to establish the eligibility of the natural persons applying for a status, for the purpose of detecting, recognising or identifying natural persons in the context of migration, asylum and border control management, with the exception of verification of travel documents. AI systems in the area of migration, asylum and border control management covered by this Regulation should comply with the relevant procedural requirements set by the Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (32), the Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (33), and other relevant Union law. The use of AI systems in migration, asylum and border control management should, in no circumstances, be used by Member States or Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies as a means to circumvent their international obligations under the UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees done at Geneva on 28 July 1951 as amended by the Protocol of 31 January 1967. Nor should they be used to in any way infringe on the principle of non-refoulement, or to deny safe and effective legal avenues into the territory of the Union, including the right to international protection.
(61)
Jenħtieġ li ċerti sistemi tal-IA maħsuba għall-amministrazzjoni tal-ġustizzja u għall-proċessi demokratiċi jiġu kklassifikati bħala b'riskju għoli, meta jitqies l-impatt potenzjalment sinifikanti tagħhom fuq id-demokrazija, l-istat tad-dritt, il-libertajiet individwali u d-dritt għal rimedju effettiv u għal proċess imparzjali. B'mod partikolari, biex jiġu indirizzati r-riskji ta' preġudizzji, żbalji u opaċità potenzjali, jixraq li s-sistemi maħsuba biex jintużaw minn awtorità ġudizzjarja jew f'isimha biex jgħinu lill-awtoritajiet ġudizzjarji fir-riċerka u l-interpretazzjoni tal-fatti u tal-liġi u fl-applikazzjoni tal-liġi għal sett konkret ta' fatti, jikkwalifikaw bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw minn korpi għal soluzzjonijiet alternattivi għat-tilwim għal dawk il-finijiet jitqiesu wkoll li huma b'riskju għoli meta l-eżiti tal-proċedimenti ta' soluzzjoni alternattiva għat-tilwim jipproduċu effetti legali għall-partijiet. L-użu ta' għodod tal-IA jista' jappoġġa s-setgħa tat-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet tal-imħallfin jew l-indipendenza ġudizzjarja, iżda jenħtieġ li ma jissostitwixxihiex: it-teħid finali ta' deċiżjonijiet irid jibqa' attività mmexxija mill-bniedem. Madankollu, jenħtieġ li l-klassifikazzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA bħala b'riskju għoli ma testendix għal sistemi tal-IA maħsuba għal attivitajiet amministrattivi purament anċillari li ma jaffettwawx l-amministrazzjoni attwali tal-ġustizzja f'każijiet individwali, bħall-anonimizzazzjoni jew il-psewdonimizzazzjoni ta' deċiżjonijiet ġudizzjarji, ta' dokumenti jew ta' data, il-komunikazzjoni bejn il-persunal jew il-kompiti amministrattivi.
(61)
Certain AI systems intended for the administration of justice and democratic processes should be classified as high-risk, considering their potentially significant impact on democracy, the rule of law, individual freedoms as well as the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial. In particular, to address the risks of potential biases, errors and opacity, it is appropriate to qualify as high-risk AI systems intended to be used by a judicial authority or on its behalf to assist judicial authorities in researching and interpreting facts and the law and in applying the law to a concrete set of facts. AI systems intended to be used by alternative dispute resolution bodies for those purposes should also be considered to be high-risk when the outcomes of the alternative dispute resolution proceedings produce legal effects for the parties. The use of AI tools can support the decision-making power of judges or judicial independence, but should not replace it: the final decision-making must remain a human-driven activity. The classification of AI systems as high-risk should not, however, extend to AI systems intended for purely ancillary administrative activities that do not affect the actual administration of justice in individual cases, such as anonymisation or pseudonymisation of judicial decisions, documents or data, communication between personnel, administrative tasks.
(62)
Mingħajr preġudizzju għar-regoli previsti fir-Regolament (UE) 2024/… tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (34), u sabiex jiġu indirizzati r-riskji ta' interferenza esterna mhux dovuta fuq id-dritt tal-vot minqux fl-Artikolu 39 tal-Karta, u ta' effetti negattivi fuq id-demokrazija u l-istat tad-dritt, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw bil-għan li jinfluwenzaw l-eżitu ta' elezzjoni jew referendum jew l-imġiba tal-votazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi fl-eżerċizzju tal-vot tagħhom fl-elezzjonijiet jew fir-referenda jiġu kklassifikati bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli bl-eċċezzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA li l-output tagħhom ma jkunx espost għal persuni fiżiċi, bħal għodod użati għall-organizzazzjoni, l-ottimizzazzjoni u l-istruttura ta' kampanji politiċi minn perspettiva amministrattiva u loġistika.
(62)
Without prejudice to the rules provided for in Regulation (EU) 2024/900 of the European Parliament and of the Council (34), and in order to address the risks of undue external interference with the right to vote enshrined in Article 39 of the Charter, and of adverse effects on democracy and the rule of law, AI systems intended to be used to influence the outcome of an election or referendum or the voting behaviour of natural persons in the exercise of their vote in elections or referenda should be classified as high-risk AI systems with the exception of AI systems whose output natural persons are not directly exposed to, such as tools used to organise, optimise and structure political campaigns from an administrative and logistical point of view.
(63)
Jenħtieġ li l-fatt li sistema tal-IA tiġi kklassifikata bħala sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament ma jiġix interpretat bħala indikatur li l-użu tas-sistema huwa legali skont atti oħra tal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew skont il-liġi nazzjonali kompatibbli mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, bħal dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali, dwar l-użu tal-poligrafi u ta' għodod simili jew ta' sistemi oħra biex jiġi identifikat l-istat emozzjonali ta' persuni fiżiċi. Jenħtieġ li kull użu bħal dan ikompli jseħħ biss f'konformità mar-rekwiżiti applikabbli li jirriżultaw mill-Karta u mill-atti applikabbli tal-liġi sekondarja tal-Unjoni u tal-liġi nazzjonali. Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament ma jinftiehemx li jipprevedi l-bażi legali għall-ipproċessar tad-data personali, inkluż kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali, meta rilevanti, sakemm mhux speċifikament previst mod ieħor f'dan ir-Regolament.
(63)
The fact that an AI system is classified as a high-risk AI system under this Regulation should not be interpreted as indicating that the use of the system is lawful under other acts of Union law or under national law compatible with Union law, such as on the protection of personal data, on the use of polygraphs and similar tools or other systems to detect the emotional state of natural persons. Any such use should continue to occur solely in accordance with the applicable requirements resulting from the Charter and from the applicable acts of secondary Union law and national law. This Regulation should not be understood as providing for the legal ground for processing of personal data, including special categories of personal data, where relevant, unless it is specifically otherwise provided for in this Regulation.
(64)
Biex jiġu mitigati r-riskji minn sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz u biex jiġi żgurat livell għoli ta' affidabbiltà, jenħtieġ li ċerti rekwiżiti obbligatorji japplikaw għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, filwaqt li jitqies l-għan maħsub u l-kuntest tal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA u skont is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju li għandha tiġi stabbilita mill-fornitur. Jenħtieġ li l-miżuri adottati mill-fornituri biex jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti obbligatorji ta' dan ir-Regolament iqisu l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku rikonoxxut b'mod ġenerali dwar l-IA, u jkunu proporzjonati u effettivi biex jintlaħqu l-objettivi ta' dan ir-Regolament. Abbażi tal-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid, kif iċċarat fl-avviż tal-Kummissjoni “Il-‘Gwida Blu’ dwar l-implimentazzjoni tar-regoli tal-prodotti tal-UE tal-2022” ir-regola ġenerali hija li aktar minn att legali wieħed tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni jista’ jkun applikabbli għal prodott wieħed, peress li l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz jista' jseħħ biss meta l-prodott jikkonforma mal-leġiżlazzjoni applikabbli kollha tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni. Il-perikli tas-sistemi tal-IA koperti mir-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament jikkonċernaw aspetti differenti mill-leġiżlazzjoni eżistenti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni u għalhekk ir-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament jikkomplementaw il-korp eżistenti tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni. Pereżempju, prodotti ta' makkinarju jew ta' apparati mediċi li jinkorporaw sistema tal-IA jistgħu jippreżentaw riskji mhux indirizzati mir-rekwiżiti essenzjali tas-saħħa u s-sikurezza stipulati fil-leġiżlazzjoni armonizzata rilevanti tal-Unjoni, peress li dik il-liġi settorjali ma tittrattax riskji speċifiċi għas-sistemi tal-IA. Dan jitlob li jkun hemm l-applikazzjoni simultanja u komplementari tad-diversi atti leġiżlattivi. Sabiex tiġi żgurata l-konsistenza u jiġu evitati piż u kostijiet amministrattivi bla bżonn, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' prodott li jkun fih sistema ta' IA b'riskju għoli waħda jew aktar, li għaliha japplikaw ir-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament u tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bbażata fuq il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid u elenkata f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, ikollhom flessibbiltà fir-rigward tad-deċiżjonijiet operazzjonali dwar kif tiġi żgurata l-konformità ta' prodott li jkun fih sistema tal-IA waħda jew aktar mar-rekwiżiti applikabbli kollha ta' dik il-leġiżlazzjoni armonizzata tal-Unjoni bl-aħjar mod. Dik il-flessibbiltà tista' tfisser, pereżempju, deċiżjoni mill-fornitur li jintegra parti mill-proċessi ta' ttestjar u rapportar, informazzjoni u dokumentazzjoni meħtieġa skont dan ir-Regolament fid-dokumentazzjoni u l-proċeduri diġà eżistenti meħtieġa skont il-leġiżlazzjoni eżistenti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bbażata fuq il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid u elenkata f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament. Dan jenħtieġ li bl-ebda mod ma jimmina l-obbligu tal-fornitur li jikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti applikabbli kollha.
(64)
To mitigate the risks from high-risk AI systems placed on the market or put into service and to ensure a high level of trustworthiness, certain mandatory requirements should apply to high-risk AI systems, taking into account the intended purpose and the context of use of the AI system and according to the risk-management system to be established by the provider. The measures adopted by the providers to comply with the mandatory requirements of this Regulation should take into account the generally acknowledged state of the art on AI, be proportionate and effective to meet the objectives of this Regulation. Based on the New Legislative Framework, as clarified in Commission notice ‘The “Blue Guide” on the implementation of EU product rules 2022’, the general rule is that more than one legal act of Union harmonisation legislation may be applicable to one product, since the making available or putting into service can take place only when the product complies with all applicable Union harmonisation legislation. The hazards of AI systems covered by the requirements of this Regulation concern different aspects than the existing Union harmonisation legislation and therefore the requirements of this Regulation would complement the existing body of the Union harmonisation legislation. For example, machinery or medical devices products incorporating an AI system might present risks not addressed by the essential health and safety requirements set out in the relevant Union harmonised legislation, as that sectoral law does not deal with risks specific to AI systems. This calls for a simultaneous and complementary application of the various legislative acts. To ensure consistency and to avoid an unnecessary administrative burden and unnecessary costs, providers of a product that contains one or more high-risk AI system, to which the requirements of this Regulation and of the Union harmonisation legislation based on the New Legislative Framework and listed in an annex to this Regulation apply, should have flexibility with regard to operational decisions on how to ensure compliance of a product that contains one or more AI systems with all the applicable requirements of that Union harmonised legislation in an optimal manner. That flexibility could mean, for example a decision by the provider to integrate a part of the necessary testing and reporting processes, information and documentation required under this Regulation into already existing documentation and procedures required under existing Union harmonisation legislation based on the New Legislative Framework and listed in an annex to this Regulation. This should not, in any way, undermine the obligation of the provider to comply with all the applicable requirements.
(65)
Jenħtieġ li s-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju tkun tikkonsisti fi proċess iterattiv kontinwu li jkun ippjanat u mħaddem tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja kollu ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li dak il-proċess ikollu l-għan li jidentifika u jimmitiga r-riskji rilevanti tas-sistemi tal-IA fuq is-saħħa, is-sikurezza u d-drittijiet fundamentali. Jenħtieġ li s-sistema tal-ġestjoni tar-riskju tiġi rieżaminata u aġġornata regolarment biex jiġi żgurat li titkompla l-effettività tagħha, kif ukoll il-ġustifikazzjoni u d-dokumentazzjoni ta' kwalunkwe deċiżjoni u azzjoni sinifikanti meħuda soġġett għal dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li dan il-proċess jiżgura li l-fornitur jidentifika r-riskji jew l-impatti negattivi u jimplimenta miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni għar-riskji magħrufa u raġonevolment prevedibbli tas-sistemi tal-IA għas-saħħa, għas-sikurezza u għad-drittijiet fundamentali fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tagħhom u tal-użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli, inkluż ir-riskji possibbli li jirriżultaw mill-interazzjoni bejn is-sistema tal-IA u l-ambjent li topera fih. Jenħtieġ li s-sistema tal-ġestjoni tar-riskju tadotta l-aktar miżuri xierqa ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju fid-dawl tal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku fl-IA. Meta jidentifika l-aktar miżuri xierqa ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju, jenħtieġ li l-fornitur jiddokumenta u jispjega l-għażliet li jkunu saru u, meta rilevanti, jinvolvi esperti u partijiet ikkonċernati esterni. Meta jidentifika l-użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, il-fornitur jenħtieġ li jkopri l-użi ta' sistemi tal-IA li, filwaqt li ma jkunux koperti direttament mill-għan maħsub u previst fl-istruzzjoni għall-użu, xorta waħda jistgħu jkunu raġonevolment mistennija li jirriżultaw minn imġiba umana faċilment prevedibbli fil-kuntest tal-karatteristiċi speċifiċi u tal-użu ta' sistema tal-IA partikolari. Jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe ċirkostanza magħrufa jew prevedibbli relatata mal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha jew f'kundizzjonijiet ta' użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli, li tista' twassal għal riskji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali, tiġi inkluża fl-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu li huma pprovduti mill-fornitur. Dan biex jiġi żgurat li l-implimentatur ikun konxju u jqishom meta juża s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li l-identifikazzjoni u l-implimentazzjoni ta' miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni tar-riskju għal użu ħażin prevedibbli skont dan ir-Regolament ma jirrikjedux taħriġ addizzjonali speċifiku għas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mill-fornitur biex jiġi indirizzat l-użu ħażin prevedibbli. Madankollu, il-fornituri huma mħeġġa jikkunsidraw tali miżuri ta' taħriġ addizzjonali biex itaffu l-użi ħżiena prevedibbli raġonevoli kif meħtieġ u xieraq.
(65)
The risk-management system should consist of a continuous, iterative process that is planned and run throughout the entire lifecycle of a high-risk AI system. That process should be aimed at identifying and mitigating the relevant risks of AI systems on health, safety and fundamental rights. The risk-management system should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure its continuing effectiveness, as well as justification and documentation of any significant decisions and actions taken subject to this Regulation. This process should ensure that the provider identifies risks or adverse impacts and implements mitigation measures for the known and reasonably foreseeable risks of AI systems to the health, safety and fundamental rights in light of their intended purpose and reasonably foreseeable misuse, including the possible risks arising from the interaction between the AI system and the environment within which it operates. The risk-management system should adopt the most appropriate risk-management measures in light of the state of the art in AI. When identifying the most appropriate risk-management measures, the provider should document and explain the choices made and, when relevant, involve experts and external stakeholders. In identifying the reasonably foreseeable misuse of high-risk AI systems, the provider should cover uses of AI systems which, while not directly covered by the intended purpose and provided for in the instruction for use may nevertheless be reasonably expected to result from readily predictable human behaviour in the context of the specific characteristics and use of a particular AI system. Any known or foreseeable circumstances related to the use of the high-risk AI system in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse, which may lead to risks to the health and safety or fundamental rights should be included in the instructions for use that are provided by the provider. This is to ensure that the deployer is aware and takes them into account when using the high-risk AI system. Identifying and implementing risk mitigation measures for foreseeable misuse under this Regulation should not require specific additional training for the high-risk AI system by the provider to address foreseeable misuse. The providers however are encouraged to consider such additional training measures to mitigate reasonable foreseeable misuses as necessary and appropriate.
(66)
Jenħtieġ li r-rekwiżiti japplikaw għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli fir-rigward tal-ġestjoni tar-riskju, il-kwalità u r-rilevanza tas-settijiet tad-data użati, id-dokumentazzjoni teknika u ż-żamma tar-rekords, it-trasparenza u l-għoti tal-informazzjoni lill-implimentaturi, is-sorveljanza mill-bniedem, u r-robustezza, l-akkuratezza u ċ-ċibersigurtà. Dawk ir-rekwiżiti huma meħtieġa biex itaffu b'mod effettiv ir-riskji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza u għad-drittijiet fundamentali. Billi l-ebda miżura oħra anqas restrittiva għall-kummerċ ma tkun raġonevolment disponibbli, dawk ir-rekwiżiti mhumiex restrizzjonijiet mhux ġustifikati għall-kummerċ.
(66)
Requirements should apply to high-risk AI systems as regards risk management, the quality and relevance of data sets used, technical documentation and record-keeping, transparency and the provision of information to deployers, human oversight, and robustness, accuracy and cybersecurity. Those requirements are necessary to effectively mitigate the risks for health, safety and fundamental rights. As no other less trade restrictive measures are reasonably available those requirements are not unjustified restrictions to trade.
(67)
Id-data ta' kwalità għolja u l-aċċess għal data ta' kwalità għolja għandhom rwol vitali fl-għoti tal-istruttura u fl-iżgurar tal-prestazzjoni ta' ħafna sistemi tal-IA, speċjalment meta jintużaw tekniki li jinvolvu t-taħriġ tal-mudelli, bl-għan li jiġi żgurat li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli taħdem kif suppost u b'mod sikur u ma ssirx sors ta' diskriminazzjoni pprojbit mil-liġi tal-Unjoni. Settijiet tad-data ta' kwalità għolja għal taħriġ, validazzjoni u ttestjar jirrikjedu l-implimentazzjoni ta' prattiki xierqa ta' governanza u ġestjoni tad-data. Jenħtieġ li s-settijiet tad-data għal taħriġ, validazzjoni u ttestjar, inkluż it-tikketti, ikunu rilevanti, rappreżentattivi biżżejjed, u sa fejn possibbli mingħajr żbalji u kompluti fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tas-sistema. Sabiex tiġi ffaċilitata l-konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data, bħar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, jenħtieġ li l-prattiki ta' governanza u tal-ġestjoni tad-data jinkludu, fil-każ ta' data personali, trasparenza fir-rigward tal-iskop oriġinali tal-ġbir tad-data. Jenħtieġ li s-settijiet tad-data jkollhom ukoll il-proprjetajiet statistiċi xierqa, inkluż fir-rigward tal-persuni jew tal-gruppi ta' persuni li fir-rigward tagħhom hija maħsuba li tintuża s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, b'attenzjoni speċifika għall-mitigazzjoni tal-preġudizzji possibbli fis-settijiet tad-data, li x'aktarx jaffettwaw is-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni, ikollhom impatt negattiv fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali jew iwasslu għal diskriminazzjoni pprojbita skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni, speċjalment meta l-outputs tad-data jinfluwenzaw l-inputs għal operazzjonijiet futuri (feedback loops). Il-preġudizzji jistgħu pereżempju jkunu inerenti fis-settijiet tad-data sottostanti, speċjalment meta tkun qed tintuża data storika, jew iġġenerati meta s-sistemi jiġu implimentati f'ambjenti reali. Ir-riżultati pprovduti mis-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jiġu influwenzati minn tali preġudizzji inerenti li huma inklinati li jiżdiedu gradwalment u b'hekk jipperpetwaw u jamplifikaw id-diskriminazzjoni eżistenti, b'mod partikolari għal persuni li jagħmlu parti minn ċerti gruppi vulnerabbli, inkluż gruppi razzjali jew etniċi. Jenħtieġ li r-rekwiżit li s-settijiet tad-data jkunu kemm jista' jkun kompluti u mingħajr żbalji ma jaffettwax l-użu ta' tekniki li jippreservaw il-privatezza fil-kuntest tal-iżvilupp u l-ittestjar tas-sistemi tal-IA. B'mod partikolari, jenħtieġ li s-settijiet tad-data jqisu, sa fejn ikun meħtieġ mill-għan maħsub tagħhom, il-karatteristiċi jew l-elementi partikolari għall-ambjent jew għall-issettjar ġeografiku, kuntestwali, komportamentali jew funzjonali speċifiku li fih tkun maħsuba li tintuża s-sistema tal-IA. Ir-rekwiżiti relatati mal-governanza tad-data jistgħu jiġu rrispettati billi jsir rikors għal partijiet terzi li joffru servizzi ta' konformità ċċertifikati inkluż verifika tal-governanza tad-data, tal-integrità tas-sett tad-data, u tat-taħriġ tad-data, il-prattiki tal-validazzjoni u tal-ittestjar, sa fejn tiġi żgurata l-konformità mar-rekwiżiti tad-data ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(67)
High-quality data and access to high-quality data plays a vital role in providing structure and in ensuring the performance of many AI systems, especially when techniques involving the training of models are used, with a view to ensure that the high-risk AI system performs as intended and safely and it does not become a source of discrimination prohibited by Union law. High-quality data sets for training, validation and testing require the implementation of appropriate data governance and management practices. Data sets for training, validation and testing, including the labels, should be relevant, sufficiently representative, and to the best extent possible free of errors and complete in view of the intended purpose of the system. In order to facilitate compliance with Union data protection law, such as Regulation (EU) 2016/679, data governance and management practices should include, in the case of personal data, transparency about the original purpose of the data collection. The data sets should also have the appropriate statistical properties, including as regards the persons or groups of persons in relation to whom the high-risk AI system is intended to be used, with specific attention to the mitigation of possible biases in the data sets, that are likely to affect the health and safety of persons, have a negative impact on fundamental rights or lead to discrimination prohibited under Union law, especially where data outputs influence inputs for future operations (feedback loops). Biases can for example be inherent in underlying data sets, especially when historical data is being used, or generated when the systems are implemented in real world settings. Results provided by AI systems could be influenced by such inherent biases that are inclined to gradually increase and thereby perpetuate and amplify existing discrimination, in particular for persons belonging to certain vulnerable groups, including racial or ethnic groups. The requirement for the data sets to be to the best extent possible complete and free of errors should not affect the use of privacy-preserving techniques in the context of the development and testing of AI systems. In particular, data sets should take into account, to the extent required by their intended purpose, the features, characteristics or elements that are particular to the specific geographical, contextual, behavioural or functional setting which the AI system is intended to be used. The requirements related to data governance can be complied with by having recourse to third parties that offer certified compliance services including verification of data governance, data set integrity, and data training, validation and testing practices, as far as compliance with the data requirements of this Regulation are ensured.
(68)
Għall-iżvilupp u l-valutazzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, jenħtieġ li ċerti atturi, bħal fornituri, korpi notifikati u entitajiet rilevanti oħra, bħaċ-Ċentri Ewropej tal-Innovazzjoni Diġitali, il-faċilitajiet tal-esperimentazzjoni u ttestjar, u r-riċerkaturi, ikunu jistgħu jaċċessaw u jużaw settijiet tad-data ta' kwalità għolja fl-oqsma tal-attivitajiet ta' dawk l-atturi li huma relatati ma' dan ir-Regolament. L-ispazji komuni Ewropej tad-data stabbiliti mill-Kummissjoni u l-faċilitazzjoni tal-kondiviżjoni tad-data bejn in-negozji u mal-gvern fl-interess pubbliku ser ikunu strumentali biex jipprovdu aċċess affidabbli, responsabbli u nondiskriminatorju għal data ta' kwalità għolja għat-taħriġ, il-validazzjoni u l-ittestjar tas-sistemi tal-IA. Pereżempju, fil-qasam tas-saħħa, l-ispazju Ewropew tad-data dwar is-saħħa ser jiffaċilita aċċess nondiskriminatorju għal data dwar is-saħħa u t-taħriġ ta' algoritmi tal-IA fuq dawk is-settijiet tad-data, b'mod li jiżgura l-privatezza, li hu sigur, fil-ħin, trasparenti u affidabbli, u b'governanza istituzzjonali xierqa. L-awtoritajiet kompetenti rilevanti, inkluż dawk settorjali, li jipprovdu jew jappoġġaw l-aċċess għad-data, jistgħu jappoġġaw ukoll il-forniment ta' data ta' kwalità għolja għat-taħriġ, il-validazzjoni u l-ittestjar tas-sistemi tal-IA.
(68)
For the development and assessment of high-risk AI systems, certain actors, such as providers, notified bodies and other relevant entities, such as European Digital Innovation Hubs, testing experimentation facilities and researchers, should be able to access and use high-quality data sets within the fields of activities of those actors which are related to this Regulation. European common data spaces established by the Commission and the facilitation of data sharing between businesses and with government in the public interest will be instrumental to provide trustful, accountable and non-discriminatory access to high-quality data for the training, validation and testing of AI systems. For example, in health, the European health data space will facilitate non-discriminatory access to health data and the training of AI algorithms on those data sets, in a privacy-preserving, secure, timely, transparent and trustworthy manner, and with an appropriate institutional governance. Relevant competent authorities, including sectoral ones, providing or supporting the access to data may also support the provision of high-quality data for the training, validation and testing of AI systems.
(69)
Id-dritt għall-privatezza u għall-protezzjoni tad-data personali jrid jiġi ggarantit tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja kollu tas-sistema tal-IA. F'dan ir-rigward, il-prinċipji tal-minimizzazzjoni tad-data u tal-protezzjoni tad-data mid-disinn u b'mod awtomatiku, kif stipulati fil-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data, huma applikabbli meta tiġi pproċessata d-data personali. Il-miżuri meħuda mill-fornituri biex jiżguraw il-konformità ma' dawk il-prinċipji jistgħu jinkludu mhux biss l-anonimizzazzjoni u l-kriptaġġ, iżda wkoll l-użu ta' teknoloġija li tippermetti li l-algoritmi jinġiebu fid-data u li tippermetti t-taħriġ tas-sistemi tal-IA mingħajr it-trażmissjoni bejn il-partijiet jew l-ikkupjar tad-data mhux ipproċessata jew strutturata nnifisha, mingħajr preġudizzju għar-rekwiżiti dwar il-governanza tad-data previsti f'dan ir-Regolament.
(69)
The right to privacy and to protection of personal data must be guaranteed throughout the entire lifecycle of the AI system. In this regard, the principles of data minimisation and data protection by design and by default, as set out in Union data protection law, are applicable when personal data are processed. Measures taken by providers to ensure compliance with those principles may include not only anonymisation and encryption, but also the use of technology that permits algorithms to be brought to the data and allows training of AI systems without the transmission between parties or copying of the raw or structured data themselves, without prejudice to the requirements on data governance provided for in this Regulation.
(70)
Biex jiġi protett id-dritt ta' oħrajn mid-diskriminazzjoni li tista' tirriżulta mill-preġudizzju fis-sistemi tal-IA, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri, b'mod eċċezzjonali, sa fejn ikun strettament meħtieġ għall-fini tal-iżgurar tal-kxif u l-korrezzjoni tal-preġudizzji fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, soġġetti għal salvagwardji xierqa għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet fundamentali tal-persuni fiżiċi u wara l-applikazzjoni tal-kundizzjonijiet applikabbli kollha stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament flimkien mal-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti fir-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 u (UE) 2018/1725 u fid-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, ikunu jistgħu jipproċessaw ukoll kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali, bħala kwistjoni ta' interess pubbliku sostanzjali skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 9(2), il-punt (g) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 u l-Artikolu 10(2), il-punt (g) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725.
(70)
In order to protect the right of others from the discrimination that might result from the bias in AI systems, the providers should, exceptionally, to the extent that it is strictly necessary for the purpose of ensuring bias detection and correction in relation to the high-risk AI systems, subject to appropriate safeguards for the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and following the application of all applicable conditions laid down under this Regulation in addition to the conditions laid down in Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, be able to process also special categories of personal data, as a matter of substantial public interest within the meaning of Article 9(2), point (g) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 10(2), point (g) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
(71)
Huwa essenzjali li jkun hemm informazzjoni komprensibbli dwar kif ġew żviluppati s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u kif jaħdmu tul ħajjithom kollha biex tkun tista' ssir it-traċċabbiltà ta' dawk is-sistemi, biex tiġi vverifikata l-konformità mar-rekwiżiti skont dan ir-Regolament, kif ukoll biex isir monitoraġġ tal-operazzjonijiet tagħhom u sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq. Għal dan il-għan, hemm bżonn li jinżammu rekords u li jkun hemm disponibbli dokumentazzjoni teknika, bl-informazzjoni meħtieġa biex tiġi vvalutata l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti rilevanti u tiġi ffaċilitata s-sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq. Jenħtieġ li din l-informazzjoni tkun tinkludi l-karatteristiċi ġenerali, il-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet tas-sistema, tal-algoritmi, tad-data, tat-taħriġ, tal-ittestjar u tal-proċessi ta' validazzjoni użati kif ukoll dokumentazzjoni dwar is-sistema rilevanti tal-ġestjoni tar-riskji u li tkun mfassla f'forma ċara u komprensiva. Jenħtieġ li d-dokumentazzjoni teknika tinżamm aġġornata b'mod xieraq tul il-ħajja tas-sistema tal-IA. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jippermettu teknikament ir-reġistrazzjoni awtomatika tal-avvenimenti, permezz ta' reġistri, tul il-ħajja tas-sistema.
(71)
Having comprehensible information on how high-risk AI systems have been developed and how they perform throughout their lifetime is essential to enable traceability of those systems, verify compliance with the requirements under this Regulation, as well as monitoring of their operations and post market monitoring. This requires keeping records and the availability of technical documentation, containing information which is necessary to assess the compliance of the AI system with the relevant requirements and facilitate post market monitoring. Such information should include the general characteristics, capabilities and limitations of the system, algorithms, data, training, testing and validation processes used as well as documentation on the relevant risk-management system and drawn in a clear and comprehensive form. The technical documentation should be kept up to date, appropriately throughout the lifetime of the AI system. Furthermore, high-risk AI systems should technically allow for the automatic recording of events, by means of logs, over the duration of the lifetime of the system.
(72)
Biex jiġi indirizzat it-tħassib relatat mal-opaċità u l-kumplessità ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA u biex l-implimentaturi jiġu megħjuna jissodisfaw l-obbligi tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li tkun meħtieġa trasparenza għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli qabel ma jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew jitqiegħdu fis-servizz. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jitfasslu b'mod li jippermetti lill-implimentaturi jifhmu kif taħdem is-sistema tal-IA, jevalwaw il-funzjonalità tagħha, u jifhmu l-elementi b'saħħithom u l-limitazzjonijiet tagħha. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jkunu akkumpanjati minn informazzjoni xierqa fil-forma ta' struzzjonijiet dwar l-użu. Jenħtieġ li tali informazzjoni tinkludi l-karatteristiċi, il-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet tal-prestazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA. Dawk ikopru informazzjoni dwar ċirkostanzi magħrufa u prevedibbli possibbli relatati mal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, inkluż l-azzjoni tal-implimentatur li tista' tinfluwenza l-imġiba u l-prestazzjoni tas-sistema, li skontha s-sistema tal-IA tista' twassal għal riskji għas-saħħa, is-sikurezza, u d-drittijiet fundamentali, dwar il-bidliet li jkunu ġew iddeterminati minn qabel u vvalutati għall-konformità mill-fornitur u dwar il-miżuri rilevanti ta' sorveljanza mill-bniedem, inkluż il-miżuri li jiffaċilitaw l-interpretazzjoni tal-outputs tas-sistema tal-IA mill-implimentaturi. It-trasparenza, inkluż l-istruzzjonijiet ta' akkumpanjament għall-użu, għandha tassisti lill-implimentaturi fl-użu tas-sistema u tappoġġa t-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet infurmat minnhom., Jenħtieġ li l-implimentaturi, fost l-oħrajn, jkunu f'pożizzjoni aħjar biex jagħmlu l-għażla korretta tas-sistema li beħsiebhom jużaw fid-dawl tal-obbligi applikabbli għalihom, jiġu edukati dwar l-użi maħsuba u preklużi, u jużaw is-sistema tal-IA b'mod korrett u kif xieraq. Biex jissaħħu l-leġibbiltà u l-aċċessibbiltà tal-informazzjoni inkluża fl-istruzzjonijiet tal-użu, meta xieraq, jenħtieġ li jiġu inklużi eżempji illustrattivi, pereżempju dwar il-limitazzjonijiet u dwar l-użi maħsuba u preklużi tas-sistema tal-IA. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri jiżguraw li d-dokumentazzjoni kollha, inkluż l-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu, ikun fiha informazzjoni sinifikanti, komprensiva, aċċessibbli u li tinftiehem, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-ħtiġijiet u l-għarfien prevedibbli tal-implimentaturi fil-mira. Jenħtieġ li l-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu jkunu disponibbli b'lingwa li tista' tinftiehem faċilment mill-implimentaturi fil-mira, kif determinat mill-Istat Membru kkonċernat.
(72)
To address concerns related to opacity and complexity of certain AI systems and help deployers to fulfil their obligations under this Regulation, transparency should be required for high-risk AI systems before they are placed on the market or put it into service. High-risk AI systems should be designed in a manner to enable deployers to understand how the AI system works, evaluate its functionality, and comprehend its strengths and limitations. High-risk AI systems should be accompanied by appropriate information in the form of instructions of use. Such information should include the characteristics, capabilities and limitations of performance of the AI system. Those would cover information on possible known and foreseeable circumstances related to the use of the high-risk AI system, including deployer action that may influence system behaviour and performance, under which the AI system can lead to risks to health, safety, and fundamental rights, on the changes that have been pre-determined and assessed for conformity by the provider and on the relevant human oversight measures, including the measures to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of the AI system by the deployers. Transparency, including the accompanying instructions for use, should assist deployers in the use of the system and support informed decision making by them. Deployers should, inter alia, be in a better position to make the correct choice of the system that they intend to use in light of the obligations applicable to them, be educated about the intended and precluded uses, and use the AI system correctly and as appropriate. In order to enhance legibility and accessibility of the information included in the instructions of use, where appropriate, illustrative examples, for instance on the limitations and on the intended and precluded uses of the AI system, should be included. Providers should ensure that all documentation, including the instructions for use, contains meaningful, comprehensive, accessible and understandable information, taking into account the needs and foreseeable knowledge of the target deployers. Instructions for use should be made available in a language which can be easily understood by target deployers, as determined by the Member State concerned.
(73)
Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jitfasslu u jiġu żviluppati b'tali mod li l-persuni fiżiċi jkunu jistgħu jissorveljaw il-funzjonament tagħhom, jiżguraw li jintużaw kif maħsub u li l-impatti tagħhom jiġu indirizzati matul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja tas-sistema. Għal dak il-għan, jenħtieġ li l-fornitur tas-sistema jidentifika miżuri xierqa ta' sorveljanza mill-bniedem qabel ma tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz. B'mod partikolari, meta xieraq, jenħtieġ li dawn il-miżuri jkunu jiggarantixxu li s-sistema tkun soġġetta għal restrizzjonijiet operazzjonali inkorporati li ma jistgħux jitwarrbu mis-sistema nnifisha u li tkun tirreaġixxi għall-operatur uman, u li l-persuni fiżiċi li lilhom tkun ġiet assenjata sorveljanza mill-bniedem jkollhom il-kompetenza, it-taħriġ u l-awtorità meħtieġa biex jaqdu dak ir-rwol. Huwa essenzjali wkoll, kif xieraq, li jiġi żgurat li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jinkludu mekkaniżmi li jiggwidaw u jinfurmaw lil persuna fiżika li lilha tkun ġiet assenjata s-sorveljanza mill-bniedem biex tieħu deċiżjonijiet infurmati dwar jekk, meta u kif għandha tintervjeni biex jiġu evitati konsegwenzi jew riskji negattivi, jew biex titwaqqaf is-sistema jekk ma taħdimx kif maħsub. Meta jitqiesu l-konsegwenzi sinifikanti għall-persuni fil-każ ta' tqabbil mhux korrett minn ċerti sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika, huwa xieraq li jiġi previst rekwiżit imtejjeb ta' sorveljanza mill-bniedem għal dawk is-sistemi sabiex ma tittieħed l-ebda azzjoni jew deċiżjoni mill-implimentatur abbażi tal-identifikazzjoni li tirriżulta mis-sistema sakemm dan ma jkunx ġie vverifikat u kkonfermat separatament minn mill-inqas żewġ persuni fiżiċi. Dawk il-persuni jistgħu jkunu minn entità waħda jew aktar u jinkludu l-persuna li topera jew li tuża s-sistema. Jenħtieġ li dan ir-rekwiżit ma joħloqx piż jew dewmien bla bżonn u jista' jkun biżżejjed li l-verifiki separati mill-persuni differenti jiġu rreġistrati awtomatikament fir-reġistri ġġenerati mis-sistema. Minħabba l-ispeċifiċitajiet tal-oqsma tal-infurzar tal-liġi, il-migrazzjoni, il-kontroll tal-fruntieri u l-ażil, jenħtieġ li dan ir-rekwiżit ma japplikax fejn il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali tqis li l-applikazzjoni ta' dak ir-rekwiżit hija sproporzjonata.
(73)
High-risk AI systems should be designed and developed in such a way that natural persons can oversee their functioning, ensure that they are used as intended and that their impacts are addressed over the system’s lifecycle. To that end, appropriate human oversight measures should be identified by the provider of the system before its placing on the market or putting into service. In particular, where appropriate, such measures should guarantee that the system is subject to in-built operational constraints that cannot be overridden by the system itself and is responsive to the human operator, and that the natural persons to whom human oversight has been assigned have the necessary competence, training and authority to carry out that role. It is also essential, as appropriate, to ensure that high-risk AI systems include mechanisms to guide and inform a natural person to whom human oversight has been assigned to make informed decisions if, when and how to intervene in order to avoid negative consequences or risks, or stop the system if it does not perform as intended. Considering the significant consequences for persons in the case of an incorrect match by certain biometric identification systems, it is appropriate to provide for an enhanced human oversight requirement for those systems so that no action or decision may be taken by the deployer on the basis of the identification resulting from the system unless this has been separately verified and confirmed by at least two natural persons. Those persons could be from one or more entities and include the person operating or using the system. This requirement should not pose unnecessary burden or delays and it could be sufficient that the separate verifications by the different persons are automatically recorded in the logs generated by the system. Given the specificities of the areas of law enforcement, migration, border control and asylum, this requirement should not apply where Union or national law considers the application of that requirement to be disproportionate.
(74)
Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jaħdmu b'mod konsistenti tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja tagħhom u jissodisfaw livell xieraq ta' akkuratezza, robustezza u ċibersigurtà, fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tagħhom u f'konformità mal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku rikonoxxut b'mod ġenerali. Il-Kummissjoni u l-organizzazzjonijiet u l-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti huma mħeġġa jqisu kif xieraq il-mitigazzjoni tar-riskji u l-impatti negattivi tas-sistema tal-IA. Jenħtieġ li l-livell mistenni tal-metriċi tal-prestazzjoni jiġi ddikjarat fl-istruzzjonijiet tal-użu li jakkumpanjawhom. Il-fornituri huma mħeġġa jikkomunikaw dik l-informazzjoni lill-implimentaturi b'mod ċar u li jinftiehem faċilment, mingħajr nuqqas ta' fehim jew dikjarazzjonijiet qarrieqa. Il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-metroloġija legali, inkluż id-Direttivi 2014/31/UE (35) u 2014/32/UE (36) tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, għandha l-għan li tiżgura l-akkuratezza tal-kejl u li tgħin it-trasparenza u l-ġustizzja tat-tranżazzjonijiet kummerċjali. F'dak il-kuntest, f'kooperazzjoni mal-partijiet ikkonċernati u l-organizzazzjoni rilevanti, bħall-awtoritajiet tal-metroloġija u tal-valutazzjoni komparattiva, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tħeġġeġ, kif xieraq, l-iżvilupp ta' parametri referenzjarji u metodoloġiji ta' kejl għas-sistemi tal-IA. Meta tagħmel dan, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tieħu nota u tikkollabora mas-sħab internazzjonali li jaħdmu fuq il-metroloġija u l-indikaturi tal-kejl rilevanti relatati mal-IA.
(74)
High-risk AI systems should perform consistently throughout their lifecycle and meet an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity, in light of their intended purpose and in accordance with the generally acknowledged state of the art. The Commission and relevant organisations and stakeholders are encouraged to take due consideration of the mitigation of risks and the negative impacts of the AI system. The expected level of performance metrics should be declared in the accompanying instructions of use. Providers are urged to communicate that information to deployers in a clear and easily understandable way, free of misunderstandings or misleading statements. Union law on legal metrology, including Directives 2014/31/EU (35) and 2014/32/EU (36) of the European Parliament and of the Council, aims to ensure the accuracy of measurements and to help the transparency and fairness of commercial transactions. In that context, in cooperation with relevant stakeholders and organisation, such as metrology and benchmarking authorities, the Commission should encourage, as appropriate, the development of benchmarks and measurement methodologies for AI systems. In doing so, the Commission should take note and collaborate with international partners working on metrology and relevant measurement indicators relating to AI.
(75)
Ir-robustezza teknika hi rekwiżit ewlieni għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li dawn ikunu reżiljenti fir-rigward ta' mġiba li tagħmel ħsara jew li mhux mixtieqa b'xi mod ieħor li tista' tirriżulta minn limitazzjonijiet fis-sistemi jew fl-ambjent li fih joperaw is-sistemi (eż. żbalji, ħsarat, inkonsistenzi, sitwazzjonijiet mhux mistennija). Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jittieħdu miżuri tekniċi u organizzattivi biex tiġi żgurata r-robustezza tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, pereżempju billi jitfasslu u jiġu żviluppati soluzzjonijiet tekniċi xierqa biex tiġi evitata jew minimizzata mġiba ta' ħsara jew fi kwalunkwe każ, mhux mixtieqa. Dawk is-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi jistgħu jinkludu pereżempju mekkaniżmi li jippermettu lis-sistema tinterrompi b'mod sikur l-operat tagħha (pjanijiet sikuri) fil-preżenza ta' ċerti anomaliji jew meta l-operazzjoni sseħħ barra minn ċerti limiti predeterminati. In-nuqqas ta' protezzjoni kontra dawn ir-riskji jista' jwassal għal impatti fuq is-sikurezza jew jaffettwa ħażin id-drittijiet fundamentali, pereżempju minħabba deċiżjonijiet żbaljati jew outputs ħżiena jew preġudikati ġġenerati mis-sistema tal-IA.
(75)
Technical robustness is a key requirement for high-risk AI systems. They should be resilient in relation to harmful or otherwise undesirable behaviour that may result from limitations within the systems or the environment in which the systems operate (e.g. errors, faults, inconsistencies, unexpected situations). Therefore, technical and organisational measures should be taken to ensure robustness of high-risk AI systems, for example by designing and developing appropriate technical solutions to prevent or minimise harmful or otherwise undesirable behaviour. Those technical solution may include for instance mechanisms enabling the system to safely interrupt its operation (fail-safe plans) in the presence of certain anomalies or when operation takes place outside certain predetermined boundaries. Failure to protect against these risks could lead to safety impacts or negatively affect the fundamental rights, for example due to erroneous decisions or wrong or biased outputs generated by the AI system.
(76)
Iċ-ċibersigurtà taqdi rwol kruċjali biex ikunu żgurati sistemi tal-IA reżiljenti kontra tentattivi biex jinbidlu l-użu, l-imġiba jew il-prestazzjoni tal-proprjetajiet tas-sigurtà tagħhom jew li dawn il-proprjetajiet jiġu kompromessi minn partijiet terzi malizzjużi li jisfruttaw il-vulnerabbiltajiet tas-sistema. Iċ-ċiberattakki kontra s-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jisfruttaw assi speċifiċi għall-IA, bħal settijiet tad-data għat-taħriġ (eż. avvelenament tad-data) jew mudelli mħarrġin (eż. attakki kontradittorji jew inferenza ta' sħubija), jew jisfruttaw vulnerabbiltajiet fl-assi diġitali tas-sistema tal-IA jew fl-infrastruttura sottostanti tal-ICT. Għalhekk, biex ikun żgurat livell ta' ċibersigurtà xieraq għar-riskji, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jieħdu l-miżuri adegwati, bħal kontrolli ta' sigurtà, filwaqt li jqisu wkoll kif xieraq l-infrastruttura sottostanti tal-ICT.
(76)
Cybersecurity plays a crucial role in ensuring that AI systems are resilient against attempts to alter their use, behaviour, performance or compromise their security properties by malicious third parties exploiting the system’s vulnerabilities. Cyberattacks against AI systems can leverage AI specific assets, such as training data sets (e.g. data poisoning) or trained models (e.g. adversarial attacks or membership inference), or exploit vulnerabilities in the AI system’s digital assets or the underlying ICT infrastructure. To ensure a level of cybersecurity appropriate to the risks, suitable measures, such as security controls, should therefore be taken by the providers of high-risk AI systems, also taking into account as appropriate the underlying ICT infrastructure.
(77)
Mingħajr preġudizzju għar-rekwiżiti relatati mar-robustezza u l-akkuratezza stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament, is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta’ Regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali, f'konformità ma' dak ir-regolament jistgħu juru konformità mar-rekwiżiti taċ-ċibersigurtà ta' dan ir-Regolament billi jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti essenzjali taċ-ċibersigurtà stipulati f’ dak ir-regolament. Meta s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti essenzjali ta’ regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali, jenħtieġ li jitqiesu bħala konformi mar-rekwiżiti taċ-ċibersigurtà stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament sa fejn il-kisba ta' dawk ir-rekwiżiti tintwera fid-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE jew partijiet minnha maħruġa skont dak ir-regolament. Għal dak il-għan, jenħtieġ li l-valutazzjoni tar-riskji taċ-ċibersigurtà, assoċjati ma' prodott b'elementi diġitali kklassifikati bħala sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament, imwettqa skont regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali, tqis ir-riskji għar-reżiljenza ċibernetika ta' sistema tal-IA fir-rigward ta' tentattivi minn partijiet terzi mhux awtorizzati biex ibiddlu l-użu, l-imġiba jew il-prestazzjoni tagħha, inkluż vulnerabbiltajiet speċifiċi għall-IA bħall-avvelenament tad-data jew attakki kontradittorji, kif ukoll, kif rilevanti, riskji għad-drittijiet fundamentali kif meħtieġ minn dan ir-Regolament.
(77)
Without prejudice to the requirements related to robustness and accuracy set out in this Regulation, high-risk AI systems which fall within the scope of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements, in accordance with that regulation may demonstrate compliance with the cybersecurity requirements of this Regulation by fulfilling the essential cybersecurity requirements set out in that regulation. When high-risk AI systems fulfil the essential requirements of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements, they should be deemed compliant with the cybersecurity requirements set out in this Regulation in so far as the achievement of those requirements is demonstrated in the EU declaration of conformity or parts thereof issued under that regulation. To that end, the assessment of the cybersecurity risks, associated to a product with digital elements classified as high-risk AI system according to this Regulation, carried out under a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements, should consider risks to the cyber resilience of an AI system as regards attempts by unauthorised third parties to alter its use, behaviour or performance, including AI specific vulnerabilities such as data poisoning or adversarial attacks, as well as, as relevant, risks to fundamental rights as required by this Regulation.
(78)
Jenħtieġ li l-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità prevista minn dan ir-Regolament tapplika fir-rigward tar-rekwiżiti essenzjali taċ-ċibersigurtà ta' prodott b'elementi diġitali kopert minn Regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali u kklassifikat bħala sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament. Madankollu, jenħtieġ li din ir-regola ma tirriżultax fit-tnaqqis tal-livell meħtieġ ta' assigurazzjoni għal prodotti kritiċi b'elementi diġitali koperti minn Regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali. Għalhekk, b'deroga minn din ir-regola, sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament u li huma kkwalifikati wkoll bħala prodotti importanti u kritiċi b'elementi diġitali skont Regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali u li għalihom tapplika l-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq il-kontroll intern stipulata f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, huma soġġetti għad-dispożizzjonijiet dwar il-valutazzjoni tal-konformità ta’ Regolament tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar ir-rekwiżiti orizzontali taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-prodotti b'elementi diġitali sa fejn ikunu kkonċernati r-rekwiżiti essenzjali taċ-ċibersigurtà ta' dak ir-Regolament. F'dan il-każ, jenħtieġ li għall-aspetti l-oħra kollha koperti minn dan ir-Regolament japplikaw id-dispożizzjonijiet rispettivi dwar il-valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq il-kontroll intern stipulati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament. Filwaqt li tibni fuq l-għarfien u l-kompetenza esperta tal-ENISA dwar il-politika taċ-ċibersigurtà u l-kompiti assenjati lill-ENISA skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/881 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (37), jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tikkoopera mal-ENISA dwar kwistjonijiet relatati maċ-ċibersigurtà tas-sistemi tal-IA.
(78)
The conformity assessment procedure provided by this Regulation should apply in relation to the essential cybersecurity requirements of a product with digital elements covered by a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and classified as a high-risk AI system under this Regulation. However, this rule should not result in reducing the necessary level of assurance for critical products with digital elements covered by a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements. Therefore, by way of derogation from this rule, high-risk AI systems that fall within the scope of this Regulation and are also qualified as important and critical products with digital elements pursuant to a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and to which the conformity assessment procedure based on internal control set out in an annex to this Regulation applies, are subject to the conformity assessment provisions of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements insofar as the essential cybersecurity requirements of that regulation are concerned. In this case, for all the other aspects covered by this Regulation the respective provisions on conformity assessment based on internal control set out in an annex to this Regulation should apply. Building on the knowledge and expertise of ENISA on the cybersecurity policy and tasks assigned to ENISA under the Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council (37), the Commission should cooperate with ENISA on issues related to cybersecurity of AI systems.
(79)
Huwa xieraq li persuna fiżika jew ġuridika speċifika, definita bħala l-fornitur, tieħu r-responsabbiltà għall-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew għat-tqegħid fis-servizz ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, irrispettivament minn jekk dik il-persuna fiżika jew ġuridika tkunx il-persuna li fasslet jew żviluppat is-sistema.
(79)
It is appropriate that a specific natural or legal person, defined as the provider, takes responsibility for the placing on the market or the putting into service of a high-risk AI system, regardless of whether that natural or legal person is the person who designed or developed the system.
(80)
Bħala firmatarji tal-Konvenzjoni tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti dwar id-Drittijiet ta' Persuni b'Diżabbiltà, l-Unjoni u l-Istati Membri huma legalment obbligati li jipproteġu lill-persuni b'diżabbiltà mid-diskriminazzjoni u li jippromwovu l-ugwaljanza tagħhom, li jiżguraw li l-persuni b'diżabbiltà jkollhom aċċess, fuq bażi ugwali ma' oħrajn, għat-teknoloġiji u s-sistemi tal-informazzjoni u tal-komunikazzjoni, u li jiżguraw ir-rispett għall-privatezza tal-persuni b'diżabbiltà. Minħabba l-importanza u l-użu dejjem akbar tas-sistemi tal-IA, l-applikazzjoni tal-prinċipji tad-disinn universali għat-teknoloġiji u s-servizzi l-ġodda kollha jenħtieġ li tiżgura aċċess sħiħ u ugwali għal kulħadd li potenzjalment jista' jiġi affettwat minn jew li juża teknoloġiji tal-IA, inkluż persuni b'diżabbiltà, b'mod li jqis bis-sħiħ id-dinjità u d-diversità inerenti tagħhom. Għalhekk huwa essenzjali li l-fornituri jiżguraw konformità sħiħa mar-rekwiżiti ta' aċċessibbiltà, inkluż id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/2102 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (38) u d-Direttiva (UE) 2019/882. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri jiżguraw il-konformità ma' dawn ir-rekwiżiti mid-disinn. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li l-miżuri meħtieġa jiġu integrati kemm jista' jkun fid-disinn tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
(80)
As signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Union and the Member States are legally obliged to protect persons with disabilities from discrimination and promote their equality, to ensure that persons with disabilities have access, on an equal basis with others, to information and communications technologies and systems, and to ensure respect for privacy for persons with disabilities. Given the growing importance and use of AI systems, the application of universal design principles to all new technologies and services should ensure full and equal access for everyone potentially affected by or using AI technologies, including persons with disabilities, in a way that takes full account of their inherent dignity and diversity. It is therefore essential that providers ensure full compliance with accessibility requirements, including Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council (38) and Directive (EU) 2019/882. Providers should ensure compliance with these requirements by design. Therefore, the necessary measures should be integrated as much as possible into the design of the high-risk AI system.
(81)
Jenħtieġ li l-fornitur jistabbilixxi sistema tajba ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità, jiżgura t-twettiq tal-proċedura mitluba għal valutazzjoni tal-konformità, ifassal id-dokumentazzjoni rilevanti u jistabbilixxi sistema robusta ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma soġġetti għal obbligi rigward is-sistemi ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità skont il-liġi settorjali rilevanti tal-Unjoni jkollhom il-possibbiltà li jinkludu l-elementi tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità previsti f'dan ir-Regolament bħala parti mis-sistema eżistenti ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità prevista f'dik il-liġi settorjali l-oħra tal-Unjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-komplementarjetà bejn dan ir-Regolament u l-liġi settorjali eżistenti tal-Unjoni titqies ukoll fl-attivitajiet ta' standardizzazzjoni jew ta' gwida futuri adottati mill-Kummissjoni. L-awtoritajiet pubbliċi li jqiegħdu fis-servizz sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għall-użu tagħhom stess jistgħu jadottaw u jimplimentaw ir-regoli għas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità bħala parti mis-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità adottata fil-livell nazzjonali jew reġjonali, kif xieraq, filwaqt li jqisu l-ispeċifiċitajiet tas-settur u l-kompetenzi u l-organizzazzjoni tal-awtorità pubblika kkonċernata.
(81)
The provider should establish a sound quality management system, ensure the accomplishment of the required conformity assessment procedure, draw up the relevant documentation and establish a robust post-market monitoring system. Providers of high-risk AI systems that are subject to obligations regarding quality management systems under relevant sectoral Union law should have the possibility to include the elements of the quality management system provided for in this Regulation as part of the existing quality management system provided for in that other sectoral Union law. The complementarity between this Regulation and existing sectoral Union law should also be taken into account in future standardisation activities or guidance adopted by the Commission. Public authorities which put into service high-risk AI systems for their own use may adopt and implement the rules for the quality management system as part of the quality management system adopted at a national or regional level, as appropriate, taking into account the specificities of the sector and the competences and organisation of the public authority concerned.
(82)
Biex jiġi ffaċilitat l-infurzar ta' dan ir-Regolament u jinħolqu kundizzjonijiet ekwi għall-operaturi, u filwaqt li jitqiesu l-forom differenti ta' tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni tal-prodotti diġitali, hu importanti li jkun żgurat li, f'kull ċirkostanza, persuna stabbilita fl-Unjoni tkun tista' tipprovdi l-informazzjoni kollha meħtieġa lill-awtoritajiet dwar il-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA. Għalhekk, qabel ma jagħmlu s-sistemi tal-IA tagħhom disponibbli fl-Unjoni, il-fornituri stabbiliti f'pajjiżi terzi jenħtieġ li jaħtru, b'mandat bil-miktub, rappreżentant awtorizzat stabbilit fl-Unjoni. Dan ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu rwol kruċjali biex jiżgura l-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz fl-Unjoni minn dawk il-fornituri li mhumiex stabbiliti fl-Unjoni, u biex iservi bħala l-persuna ta' kuntatt tagħhom stabbilit fl-Unjoni.
(82)
To enable enforcement of this Regulation and create a level playing field for operators, and, taking into account the different forms of making available of digital products, it is important to ensure that, under all circumstances, a person established in the Union can provide authorities with all the necessary information on the compliance of an AI system. Therefore, prior to making their AI systems available in the Union, providers established in third countries should, by written mandate, appoint an authorised representative established in the Union. This authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the high-risk AI systems placed on the market or put into service in the Union by those providers who are not established in the Union and in serving as their contact person established in the Union.
(83)
Fid-dawl tan-natura u l-kumplessità tal-katina tal-valur għas-sistemi tal-IA u f'konformità mal-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid, huwa essenzjali li tiġi żgurata ċ-ċertezza legali u tiġi ffaċilitata l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament. Għalhekk, jeħtieġ li jiġu ċċarati r-rwol u l-obbligi speċifiċi tal-operaturi rilevanti tul dik il-katina tal-valur, bħall-importaturi u d-distributuri li jistgħu jikkontribwixxu għall-iżvilupp tas-sistemi tal-IA. F'ċerti sitwazzjonijiet, dawk l-operaturi jistgħu jaġixxu f'aktar minn rwol wieħed fl-istess ħin u għalhekk jenħtieġ li jissodisfaw b'mod kumulattiv l-obbligi rilevanti kollha assoċjati ma' dawk ir-rwoli. Pereżempju, operatur jista' jaġixxi bħala distributur u importatur fl-istess ħin.
(83)
In light of the nature and complexity of the value chain for AI systems and in line with the New Legislative Framework, it is essential to ensure legal certainty and facilitate the compliance with this Regulation. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the role and the specific obligations of relevant operators along that value chain, such as importers and distributors who may contribute to the development of AI systems. In certain situations those operators could act in more than one role at the same time and should therefore fulfil cumulatively all relevant obligations associated with those roles. For example, an operator could act as a distributor and an importer at the same time.
(84)
Biex tiġi żgurata ċ-ċertezza legali, jeħtieġ li jiġi ċċarat li, taħt ċerti kundizzjonijiet speċifiċi, jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe distributur, importatur, implimentatur jew parti terza oħra titqies bħala fornitur ta' sistema ġdida tal-IA b'riskju għoli u għalhekk tassumi l-obbligi rilevanti kollha. Dan ikun il-każ jekk dik il-parti tqiegħed isimha jew it-trademark tagħha fuq sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli diġà introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-arranġamenti kuntrattwali li jistipulaw li l-obbligi jiġu allokati mod ieħor. Dan ikun ukoll il-każ jekk dik il-parti tagħmel modifika sostanzjali f'sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li tkun diġà introdotta fis-suq jew diġà tqiegħdet fis-servizz b'mod li tibqa' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, jew jekk timmodifika l-għan maħsub ta' sistema tal-IA, inkluż sistema tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, li ma tkunx ġiet ikklassifikata bħala b'riskju għoli u li tkun diġà introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz, b'mod li s-sistema tal-IA ssir sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li dawk id-dispożizzjonijiet japplikaw mingħajr preġudizzju għal dispożizzjonijiet aktar speċifiċi stabbiliti f'ċerti leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bbażata fuq il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid, li flimkien miegħu għandu japplika dan ir-Regolament. Pereżempju, jenħtieġ li l-Artikolu 16(2), tar-Regolament (UE) 2017/745, li jistabbilixxi li ċerti bidliet m'għandhomx jitqiesu bħala modifiki ta' apparat li jistgħu jaffettwaw il-konformità tiegħu mar-rekwiżiti applikabbli, ikompli japplika għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma apparati mediċi skont it-tifsira ta' dak ir-Regolament.
(84)
To ensure legal certainty, it is necessary to clarify that, under certain specific conditions, any distributor, importer, deployer or other third-party should be considered to be a provider of a high-risk AI system and therefore assume all the relevant obligations. This would be the case if that party puts its name or trademark on a high-risk AI system already placed on the market or put into service, without prejudice to contractual arrangements stipulating that the obligations are allocated otherwise. This would also be the case if that party makes a substantial modification to a high-risk AI system that has already been placed on the market or has already been put into service in a way that it remains a high-risk AI system in accordance with this Regulation, or if it modifies the intended purpose of an AI system, including a general-purpose AI system, which has not been classified as high-risk and has already been placed on the market or put into service, in a way that the AI system becomes a high-risk AI system in accordance with this Regulation. Those provisions should apply without prejudice to more specific provisions established in certain Union harmonisation legislation based on the New Legislative Framework, together with which this Regulation should apply. For example, Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/745, establishing that certain changes should not be considered to be modifications of a device that could affect its compliance with the applicable requirements, should continue to apply to high-risk AI systems that are medical devices within the meaning of that Regulation.
(85)
Sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu jintużaw bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli waħedhom jew ikunu komponenti ta' sistemi oħra tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Għaldaqstant, minħabba n-natura partikolari tagħhom u sabiex jiġi żgurat tqassim ġust tar-responsabbiltajiet tul il-katina ta' valur tal-IA, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' tali sistemi, irrispettivament minn jekk jistgħux jintużaw bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli bħala tali minn fornituri oħra jew bħala komponenti ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u dment li ma jkunx previst mod ieħor skont dan ir-Regolament, jikkooperaw mill-qrib mal-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli rilevanti biex jiffaċilitaw il-konformità tagħhom mal-obbligi rilevanti skont dan ir-Regolament u mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti stabbiliti skont dan ir-Regolament.
(85)
General-purpose AI systems may be used as high-risk AI systems by themselves or be components of other high-risk AI systems. Therefore, due to their particular nature and in order to ensure a fair sharing of responsibilities along the AI value chain, the providers of such systems should, irrespective of whether they may be used as high-risk AI systems as such by other providers or as components of high-risk AI systems and unless provided otherwise under this Regulation, closely cooperate with the providers of the relevant high-risk AI systems to enable their compliance with the relevant obligations under this Regulation and with the competent authorities established under this Regulation.
(86)
Meta, skont il-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-fornitur li inizjalment ikun introduċa s-sistema tal-IA fis-suq jew qiegħdha fis-servizz ma jibqax jitqies bħala l-fornitur għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, u meta dak il-fornitur ma jkunx eskluda espressament il-bidla tas-sistema tal-IA f'sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, jenħtieġ li dan il-fornitur preċedenti madankollu jikkoopera mill-qrib u jagħmel disponibbli l-informazzjoni meħtieġa u jipprovdi l-aċċess tekniku raġonevolment mistenni u assistenza oħra meħtieġa għat-twettiq tal-obbligi stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tar-rispett tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
(86)
Where, under the conditions laid down in this Regulation, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service should no longer be considered to be the provider for the purposes of this Regulation, and when that provider has not expressly excluded the change of the AI system into a high-risk AI system, the former provider should nonetheless closely cooperate and make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular regarding the compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems.
(87)
Barra minn hekk, meta sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li tkun komponent tas-sikurezza ta' prodott li jaqa' fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bbażata fuq il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid ma tkunx introdotta fis-suq jew ma titqiegħedx fis-servizz indipendentement mill-prodott, jenħtieġ li l-manifattur tal-prodott definit f'dik il-leġiżlazzjoni jikkonforma mal-obbligi tal-fornitur stabbilit f'dan ir-Regolament u jenħtieġ li, b'mod partikolari, jiżgura li s-sistema tal-IA inkorporata fil-prodott finali tikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(87)
In addition, where a high-risk AI system that is a safety component of a product which falls within the scope of Union harmonisation legislation based on the New Legislative Framework is not placed on the market or put into service independently from the product, the product manufacturer defined in that legislation should comply with the obligations of the provider established in this Regulation and should, in particular, ensure that the AI system embedded in the final product complies with the requirements of this Regulation.
(88)
Tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA diversi partijiet spiss jipprovdu sistemi tal-IA, għodod u servizzi iżda wkoll komponenti jew proċessi li jiġu inkorporati mill-fornitur fis-sistema tal-IA, b'diversi objettivi inkluż it-taħriġ tal-mudell, it-taħriġ mill-ġdid tal-mudell, l-ittestjar u l-evalwazzjoni tal-mudell, l-integrazzjoni fis-software, jew aspetti oħra tal-iżvilupp tal-mudell. Dawk il-partijiet għandhom rwol importanti fil-katina tal-valur għall-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li fiha jiġu integrati s-sistemi, l-għodod, is-servizzi, il-komponenti jew il-proċessi tal-IA tagħhom, u jenħtieġ li jipprovdu, permezz ta' ftehim bil-miktub lil dan il-fornitur, l-informazzjoni, il-kapaċitajiet, l-aċċess tekniku u assistenza oħra meħtieġa abbażi tal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku rikonoxxut b'mod ġenerali, sabiex il-fornitur ikun jista' jikkonforma bis-sħiħ mal-obbligi stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament, mingħajr ma jikkompromettu d-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali jew is-sigrieti kummerċjali tagħhom stess.
(88)
Along the AI value chain multiple parties often supply AI systems, tools and services but also components or processes that are incorporated by the provider into the AI system with various objectives, including the model training, model retraining, model testing and evaluation, integration into software, or other aspects of model development. Those parties have an important role to play in the value chain towards the provider of the high-risk AI system into which their AI systems, tools, services, components or processes are integrated, and should provide by written agreement this provider with the necessary information, capabilities, technical access and other assistance based on the generally acknowledged state of the art, in order to enable the provider to fully comply with the obligations set out in this Regulation, without compromising their own intellectual property rights or trade secrets.
(89)
Partijiet terzi li jagħmlu aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku l-għodod, is-servizzi, il-proċessi, jew il-komponenti tal-IA għajr il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, jenħtieġ li ma jingħatawx il-mandat li jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti mmirati lejn ir-responsabbiltajiet tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA, b'mod partikolari lejn il-fornitur li jkun użahom jew integrahom, meta dawk l-għodod, servizzi, proċessi, jew komponenti tal-IA jsiru aċċessibbli b'liċenzja libera u b’sors miftuħ. Jenħtieġ li l-iżviluppaturi ta' għodod, servizzi, proċessi jew komponenti tal-IA liberi u b'sors miftuħ jitħeġġu jimplimentaw prattiki ta' dokumentazzjoni adottati b'mod wiesa', bħal kards mudell u skedi tad-data, bħala mod biex titħaffef il-kondiviżjoni tal-informazzjoni tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA, u dan jippermetti l-promozzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA affidabbli fl-Unjoni.
(89)
Third parties making accessible to the public tools, services, processes, or AI components other than general-purpose AI models, should not be mandated to comply with requirements targeting the responsibilities along the AI value chain, in particular towards the provider that has used or integrated them, when those tools, services, processes, or AI components are made accessible under a free and open-source licence. Developers of free and open-source tools, services, processes, or AI components other than general-purpose AI models should be encouraged to implement widely adopted documentation practices, such as model cards and data sheets, as a way to accelerate information sharing along the AI value chain, allowing the promotion of trustworthy AI systems in the Union.
(90)
Il-Kummissjoni tista' tiżviluppa u tirrakkomanda mudelli volontarji ta' termini kuntrattwali bejn il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u l-partijiet terzi li jipprovdu għodod, servizzi, komponenti jew proċessi li jintużaw jew jiġu integrati f'sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, biex tiġi ffaċilitata l-kooperazzjoni tul il-katina tal-valur. Meta tiżviluppa mudelli volontarji ta' termini kuntrattwali, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni qis ir-rekwiżiti kuntrattwali possibbli applikabbli f'setturi jew każijiet ta' negozju speċifiċi.
(90)
The Commission could develop and recommend voluntary model contractual terms between providers of high-risk AI systems and third parties that supply tools, services, components or processes that are used or integrated in high-risk AI systems, to facilitate the cooperation along the value chain. When developing voluntary model contractual terms, the Commission should also take into account possible contractual requirements applicable in specific sectors or business cases.
(91)
Minħabba n-natura tas-sistemi tal-IA u r-riskji għas-sikurezza u għad-drittijiet fundamentali possibbilment assoċjati mal-użu tagħhom, inkluż fir-rigward tal-ħtieġa li jkun żgurat monitoraġġ xieraq tal-prestazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA f'ambjent tal-ħajja reali, jixraq jiġu stabbiliti responsabbiltajiet speċifiċi għall-implimentaturi. Jenħtieġ li l-implimentaturi, b'mod partikolari, jieħdu miżuri tekniċi u organizzattivi biex jiżguraw li jużaw sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-istruzzjonijiet tal-użu u jenħtieġ li jiġu previsti ċerti obbligi oħra fir-rigward tal-monitoraġġ tal-funzjonament tas-sistemi tal-IA u fir-rigward taż-żamma tar-rekords, kif xieraq. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-implimentaturi jiżguraw li l-persuni assenjati biex jimplimentaw l-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu u għas-sorveljanza mill-bniedem kif stipulat f'dan ir-Regolament ikollhom il-kompetenza meħtieġa, b'mod partikolari livell adegwat ta' litteriżmu, taħriġ u awtorità fir-rigward tal-IA biex iwettqu dawk il-kompiti kif suppost. Jenħtieġ li dawk l-obbligi jkunu mingħajr preġudizzju għal obbligi oħra tal-implimentatur fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali.
(91)
Given the nature of AI systems and the risks to safety and fundamental rights possibly associated with their use, including as regards the need to ensure proper monitoring of the performance of an AI system in a real-life setting, it is appropriate to set specific responsibilities for deployers. Deployers should in particular take appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure they use high-risk AI systems in accordance with the instructions of use and certain other obligations should be provided for with regard to monitoring of the functioning of the AI systems and with regard to record-keeping, as appropriate. Furthermore, deployers should ensure that the persons assigned to implement the instructions for use and human oversight as set out in this Regulation have the necessary competence, in particular an adequate level of AI literacy, training and authority to properly fulfil those tasks. Those obligations should be without prejudice to other deployer obligations in relation to high-risk AI systems under Union or national law.
(92)
Dan ir-Regolament huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għall-obbligi għall-impjegaturi li jinfurmaw jew jinfurmaw u jikkonsultaw lill-ħaddiema jew lir-rappreżentanti tagħhom skont id-dritt u l-prattika tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali, inkluż id-Direttiva 2002/14/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (39), dwar deċiżjonijiet biex jitqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jintużaw sistemi tal-IA. Jibqa' meħtieġ li tiġi żgurata l-informazzjoni tal-ħaddiema u tar-rappreżentanti tagħhom dwar l-użu ppjanat ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli fuq il-post tax-xogħol fejn il-kundizzjonijiet għal dawk l-obbligi ta' informazzjoni jew ta' informazzjoni u konsultazzjoni fi strumenti legali oħra ma jkunux issodisfati. Barra minn hekk, tali dritt għall-informazzjoni huwa anċillari u meħtieġ għall-objettiv tal-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet fundamentali li huwa l-bażi ta' dan ir-Regolament. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jiġi stabbilit rekwiżit ta' informazzjoni għal dak l-għan f'dan ir-Regolament, mingħajr ma jiġi affettwat l-ebda dritt eżistenti tal-ħaddiema.
(92)
This Regulation is without prejudice to obligations for employers to inform or to inform and consult workers or their representatives under Union or national law and practice, including Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (39), on decisions to put into service or use AI systems. It remains necessary to ensure information of workers and their representatives on the planned deployment of high-risk AI systems at the workplace where the conditions for those information or information and consultation obligations in other legal instruments are not fulfilled. Moreover, such information right is ancillary and necessary to the objective of protecting fundamental rights that underlies this Regulation. Therefore, an information requirement to that effect should be laid down in this Regulation, without affecting any existing rights of workers.
(93)
Filwaqt li r-riskji relatati mas-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jirriżultaw mill-mod kif jiġu ddisinjati sistemi bħal dawn, ir-riskji jistgħu jinħolqu wkoll minn kif jintużaw sistemi tal-IA bħal dawn. L-implimentaturi ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli għaldaqstant għandhom rwol kritiku fl-iżgurar li jiġu protetti d-drittijiet fundamentali, filwaqt li jikkomplementaw l-obbligi tal-fornitur meta jiżviluppa s-sistema tal-IA. L-implimentaturi jinsabu fl-aħjar pożizzjoni biex jifhmu kif is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli ser tintuża b'mod konkret u għalhekk jistgħu jidentifikaw riskji sinfikanti potenzjali li ma kinux previsti fil-fażi tal-iżvilupp, minħabba għarfien aktar preċiż tal-kuntest tal-użu, tal-persuni jew tal-gruppi ta' persuni li x'aktarx jiġu affettwati, inkluż gruppi vulnerabbli. L-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament ukoll għandhom rwol kruċjali li jinfurmaw lil persuni fiżiċi u, meta jieħdu deċiżjonijiet jew jassistu fit-teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet relatati mal-persuni fiżiċi, jenħtieġ li fejn applikabbli jinfurmaw lill-persuni fiżiċi li huma soġġetti għall-użu ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li din l-informazzjoni tinkludi l-għan maħsub u t-tip ta' deċiżjonijiet li tieħu. Jenħtieġ li l-implimentatur jinforma wkoll lill-persuni fiżiċi dwar id-dritt tagħhom għal spjegazzjoni pprovdut skont dan ir-Regolament. Fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli użati għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, jenħtieġ li dak l-obbligu jiġi implimentat f'konformità mal-Artikolu 13 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680.
(93)
Whilst risks related to AI systems can result from the way such systems are designed, risks can as well stem from how such AI systems are used. Deployers of high-risk AI system therefore play a critical role in ensuring that fundamental rights are protected, complementing the obligations of the provider when developing the AI system. Deployers are best placed to understand how the high-risk AI system will be used concretely and can therefore identify potential significant risks that were not foreseen in the development phase, due to a more precise knowledge of the context of use, the persons or groups of persons likely to be affected, including vulnerable groups. Deployers of high-risk AI systems listed in an annex to this Regulation also play a critical role in informing natural persons and should, when they make decisions or assist in making decisions related to natural persons, where applicable, inform the natural persons that they are subject to the use of the high-risk AI system. This information should include the intended purpose and the type of decisions it makes. The deployer should also inform the natural persons about their right to an explanation provided under this Regulation. With regard to high-risk AI systems used for law enforcement purposes, that obligation should be implemented in accordance with Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2016/680.
(94)
Jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe pproċessar ta' data bijometrika involut fl-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika għall-fini ta' infurzar tal-liġi jikkonforma mal-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, li jippermetti dan l-ipproċessar biss meta strettament meħtieġ, soġġett għal salvagwardji xierqa għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tas-suġġett tad-data, u meta awtorizzat mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew ta' Stat Membru. Tali użu, meta awtorizzat, għandu jirrispetta wkoll il-prinċipji stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 4(1) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 inkluż il-legalità, il-ġustizzja u t-trasparenza, il-limitazzjoni tal-iskop, il-preċiżjoni, l-akkuratezza u l-limitazzjoni tal-ħżin.
(94)
Any processing of biometric data involved in the use of AI systems for biometric identification for the purpose of law enforcement needs to comply with Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, that allows such processing only where strictly necessary, subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of the data subject, and where authorised by Union or Member State law. Such use, when authorised, also needs to respect the principles laid down in Article 4 (1) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 including lawfulness, fairness and transparency, purpose limitation, accuracy and storage limitation.
(95)
Mingħajr preġudizzju għal-liġi applikabbli tal-Unjoni, b'mod partikolari r-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 u d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, meta titqies in-natura intrużiva tas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f'ħin aktar tard”, l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f'ħin aktar tard” jenħtieġ li jkun soġġett għal salvagwardji. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f'ħin aktar tard” dejjem jintużaw b'mod li jkun proporzjonat, leġittimu u strettament meħtieġ, u għalhekk immirat, fir-rigward tal-individwi li għandhom jiġu identifikati, il-post, il-kamp ta' applikazzjoni temporali u abbażi ta' sett ta' data magħluq ta' filmati miksuba legalment. Fi kwalunkwe każ, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f'ħin aktar tard” ma jintużawx fil-qafas tal-infurzar tal-liġi biex iwasslu għal sorveljanza indiskriminata. Fi kwalunkwe każ jenħtieġ li l-kundizzjonijiet għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f'ħin aktar tard” ma jipprovdux bażi biex jiġu evitati l-kundizzjonijiet tal-projbizzjoni u l-eċċezzjonijiet stretti għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota f'ħin reali.
(95)
Without prejudice to applicable Union law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, considering the intrusive nature of post-remote biometric identification systems, the use of post-remote biometric identification systems should be subject to safeguards. Post-remote biometric identification systems should always be used in a way that is proportionate, legitimate and strictly necessary, and thus targeted, in terms of the individuals to be identified, the location, temporal scope and based on a closed data set of legally acquired video footage. In any case, post-remote biometric identification systems should not be used in the framework of law enforcement to lead to indiscriminate surveillance. The conditions for post-remote biometric identification should in any case not provide a basis to circumvent the conditions of the prohibition and strict exceptions for real time remote biometric identification.
(96)
Biex ikun żgurat b'mod effiċjenti li d-drittijiet fundamentali jiġu protetti, jenħtieġ li l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma korpi rregolati mil-liġi pubblika, jew entitajiet privati li jipprovdu servizzi pubbliċi u implimentaturi ta’ ċerti sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, bħal entitajiet bankarji jew tal-assigurazzjoni, iwettqu valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali qabel ma jibdew jużawha. Servizzi importanti għal individwi li huma ta' natura pubblika jistgħu jiġu pprovduti wkoll minn entitajiet privati. L-entitajiet privati li jipprovdu tali servizzi pubbliċi huma marbuta ma' kompiti fl-interess pubbliku bħal fl-oqsma tal-edukazzjoni, il-kura tas-saħħa, is-servizzi soċjali, l-akkomodazzjoni, l-amministrazzjoni tal-ġustizzja. L-għan tal-valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali huwa li l-implimentatur jidentifika r-riskji speċifiċi għad-drittijiet tal-individwi jew tal-gruppi ta' individwi li x'aktarx jiġu affettwati u jidentifika l-miżuri li għandhom jittieħdu fil-każ li dawk ir-riskji jimmaterjalizzaw. Jenħtieġ li l-valutazzjoni tal-impatt titwettaq qabel l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, u jenħtieġ li tiġi aġġornata meta l-implimentatur iqis li jkun inbidel xi wieħed mill-fatturi rilevanti. Jenħtieġ li l-valutazzjoni tal-impatt tidentifika l-proċessi rilevanti tal-implimentatur li fihom ser tintuża s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha, u jenħtieġ li tinkludi deskrizzjoni tal-perjodu ta' żmien u l-frekwenza li fihom is-sistema tkun maħsuba li tintuża kif ukoll ta' kategoriji speċifiċi ta' persuni fiżiċi u gruppi li x'aktarx jiġu affettwati fil-kuntest speċifiku tal-użu. Jenħtieġ li l-valutazzjoni tinkludi wkoll l-identifikazzjoni ta' riskji speċifiċi ta' ħsara li x'aktarx ikollhom impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali ta' dawk il-persuni jew gruppi. Meta jwettaq din il-valutazzjoni, jenħtieġ li l-implimentatur iqis l-informazzjoni rilevanti għal valutazzjoni xierqa tal-impatt, inkluż iżda mhux biss, l-informazzjoni mogħtija mill-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli fl-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu. Fid-dawl tar-riskji identifikati, jenħtieġ li l-implimentaturi jiddeterminaw il-miżuri li għandhom jittieħdu f'każ tal-materjalizzazzjoni ta' dawk ir-riskji, inkluż pereżempju arranġamenti ta' governanza f'dak il-kuntest speċifiku tal-użu, bħal arranġamenti għas-sorveljanza mill-bniedem skont l-istruzzjonijiet tal-użu jew, it-trattament tal-ilmenti u l-proċeduri ta' rimedju, peress li dawn jistgħu jkunu strumentali fil-mitigazzjoni tar-riskji għad-drittijiet fundamentali f'każijiet konkreti ta' użu. Wara li jwettaq dik il-valutazzjoni tal-impatt, jenħtieġ li l-implimentatur jinnotifika lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti. Meta xieraq, biex tinġabar l-informazzjoni rilevanti meħtieġa biex titwettaq il-valutazzjoni tal-impatt, l-implimentaturi tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, b'mod partikolari meta jintużaw sistemi tal-IA fis-settur pubbliku, jistgħu jinvolvu lill-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti, inkluż ir-rappreżentanti ta' gruppi ta' persuni li x'aktarx ikunu affettwati mis-sistema tal-IA, esperti indipendenti, u organizzazzjonijiet tas-soċjetà ċivili fit-twettiq ta' dawn il-valutazzjonijiet tal-impatt u fit-tfassil tal-miżuri li għandhom jittieħdu fil-każ tal-materjalizzazzjoni tar-riskji. Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju Ewropew għall-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali (l-Uffiċċju għall-IA) jiżviluppa mudell għal kwestjonarju sabiex jiffaċilita l-konformità u jnaqqas il-piż amministrattiv għall-amministraturi.
(96)
In order to efficiently ensure that fundamental rights are protected, deployers of high-risk AI systems that are bodies governed by public law, or private entities providing public services and deployers of certain high-risk AI systems listed in an annex to this Regulation, such as banking or insurance entities, should carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment prior to putting it into use. Services important for individuals that are of public nature may also be provided by private entities. Private entities providing such public services are linked to tasks in the public interest such as in the areas of education, healthcare, social services, housing, administration of justice. The aim of the fundamental rights impact assessment is for the deployer to identify the specific risks to the rights of individuals or groups of individuals likely to be affected, identify measures to be taken in the case of a materialisation of those risks. The impact assessment should be performed prior to deploying the high-risk AI system, and should be updated when the deployer considers that any of the relevant factors have changed. The impact assessment should identify the deployer’s relevant processes in which the high-risk AI system will be used in line with its intended purpose, and should include a description of the period of time and frequency in which the system is intended to be used as well as of specific categories of natural persons and groups who are likely to be affected in the specific context of use. The assessment should also include the identification of specific risks of harm likely to have an impact on the fundamental rights of those persons or groups. While performing this assessment, the deployer should take into account information relevant to a proper assessment of the impact, including but not limited to the information given by the provider of the high-risk AI system in the instructions for use. In light of the risks identified, deployers should determine measures to be taken in the case of a materialisation of those risks, including for example governance arrangements in that specific context of use, such as arrangements for human oversight according to the instructions of use or, complaint handling and redress procedures, as they could be instrumental in mitigating risks to fundamental rights in concrete use-cases. After performing that impact assessment, the deployer should notify the relevant market surveillance authority. Where appropriate, to collect relevant information necessary to perform the impact assessment, deployers of high-risk AI system, in particular when AI systems are used in the public sector, could involve relevant stakeholders, including the representatives of groups of persons likely to be affected by the AI system, independent experts, and civil society organisations in conducting such impact assessments and designing measures to be taken in the case of materialisation of the risks. The European Artificial Intelligence Office (AI Office) should develop a template for a questionnaire in order to facilitate compliance and reduce the administrative burden for deployers.
(97)
Jenħtieġ li l-kunċett ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jiġi ddefinit b'mod ċar u jkun distint mill-kunċett ta' sistemi tal-IA biex ikun hemm ċertezza legali. Jenħtieġ li d-definizzjoni tkun ibbażata fuq il-karatteristiċi funzjonali ewlenin ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, b'mod partikolari l-ġeneralità u l-kapaċità li jwettaq b'mod kompetenti firxa wiesgħa ta' kompiti distinti. Dawn il-mudelli huma tipikament imħarrġa fuq ammonti kbar ta' data, permezz ta' diversi metodi, bħal tagħlim awtosorveljat, mhux sorveljat jew rinforzat. Il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu jiġu introdotti fis-suq b'diversi modi, inkluż permezz ta' libreriji, interfaċċi għall-ipprogrammar tal-applikazzjonijiet (APIs), bħala tniżżil dirett, jew bħala kopja fiżika. Dawn il-mudelli jistgħu jiġu mmodifikati jew irfinati aktar f'mudelli ġodda. Għalkemm il-mudelli tal-IA huma komponenti essenzjali tas-sistemi tal-IA, waħedhom ma jikkostitwixxux sistemi tal-IA. Il-mudelli tal-IA jeħtieġu ż-żieda ta' komponenti ulterjuri, bħal pereżempju interfaċċa tal-utent, biex isiru sistemi tal-IA. Il-mudelli tal-IA tipikament jiġu integrati fis-sistemi tal-IA u jiffurmaw parti minnhom. Dan ir-Regolament jipprevedi regoli speċifiċi għal mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u għal mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li joħolqu riskji sistemiċi, li jenħtieġ li japplikaw ukoll meta dawn il-mudelli jkunu integrati jew jiffurmaw parti minn sistema tal-IA. Jenħtieġ li jinftiehem li l-obbligi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jenħtieġ li japplikaw ladarba l-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jiġu introdotti fis-suq. Meta l-fornitur ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jintegra mudell proprju fis-sistema tal-IA tiegħu stess li jiġi introdott fis-suq jew jitqiegħed fis-servizz, jenħtieġ li dak il-mudell jitqies li ġie introdott fis-suq u, għalhekk, jenħtieġ li l-obbligi f'dan ir-Regolament għall-mudelli jkomplu japplikaw flimkien ma' dawk għas-sistemi tal-IA. Fi kwalunkwe każ jenħtieġ li l-obbligi stabbiliti għall-mudelli ma japplikawx meta mudell proprju jintuża għal proċessi purament interni li ma jkunux essenzjali għall-forniment ta' prodott jew servizz lil partijiet terzi u d-drittijiet tal-persuni fiżiċi ma jiġux affettwati. Meta jitqiesu l-effetti negattivi sinifikanti potenzjali tagħhom, jenħtieġ li l-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku dejjem ikunu soġġetti għall-obbligi rilevanti skont dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li d-definizzjoni ma tkoprix il-mudelli tal-IA użati qabel l-introduzzjoni tagħhom fis-suq għall-iskop uniku ta' attivitajiet ta' riċerka, żvilupp u ħolqien ta' prototipi. Dan huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għall-obbligu ta' konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament meta, wara tali attivitajiet, mudell jiġi introdott fis-suq.
(97)
The notion of general-purpose AI models should be clearly defined and set apart from the notion of AI systems to enable legal certainty. The definition should be based on the key functional characteristics of a general-purpose AI model, in particular the generality and the capability to competently perform a wide range of distinct tasks. These models are typically trained on large amounts of data, through various methods, such as self-supervised, unsupervised or reinforcement learning. General-purpose AI models may be placed on the market in various ways, including through libraries, application programming interfaces (APIs), as direct download, or as physical copy. These models may be further modified or fine-tuned into new models. Although AI models are essential components of AI systems, they do not constitute AI systems on their own. AI models require the addition of further components, such as for example a user interface, to become AI systems. AI models are typically integrated into and form part of AI systems. This Regulation provides specific rules for general-purpose AI models and for general-purpose AI models that pose systemic risks, which should apply also when these models are integrated or form part of an AI system. It should be understood that the obligations for the providers of general-purpose AI models should apply once the general-purpose AI models are placed on the market. When the provider of a general-purpose AI model integrates an own model into its own AI system that is made available on the market or put into service, that model should be considered to be placed on the market and, therefore, the obligations in this Regulation for models should continue to apply in addition to those for AI systems. The obligations laid down for models should in any case not apply when an own model is used for purely internal processes that are not essential for providing a product or a service to third parties and the rights of natural persons are not affected. Considering their potential significantly negative effects, the general-purpose AI models with systemic risk should always be subject to the relevant obligations under this Regulation. The definition should not cover AI models used before their placing on the market for the sole purpose of research, development and prototyping activities. This is without prejudice to the obligation to comply with this Regulation when, following such activities, a model is placed on the market.
(98)
Filwaqt li l-ġeneralità ta' mudell tista', fost kriterji oħra, tiġi ddeterminata wkoll minn għadd ta' parametri, jenħtieġ li l-mudelli b'mill-inqas biljun parametru u mħarrġa b'ammont kbir ta' data bl-użu ta' awtosuperviżjoni fuq skala kbira jitqiesu li juru ġeneralità sinifikanti u li jwettqu b'mod kompetenti firxa wiesgħa ta' kompiti distintivi.
(98)
Whereas the generality of a model could, inter alia, also be determined by a number of parameters, models with at least a billion of parameters and trained with a large amount of data using self-supervision at scale should be considered to display significant generality and to competently perform a wide range of distinctive tasks.
(99)
Il-mudelli ġenerattivi kbar tal-IA huma eżempju tipiku għal mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, peress li jippermettu ġenerazzjoni flessibbli ta' kontenut, bħal fil-forma ta' test, awdjo, immaġnijiet jew vidjo, li jista' jakkomoda faċilment firxa wiesgħa ta' kompiti distintivi.
(99)
Large generative AI models are a typical example for a general-purpose AI model, given that they allow for flexible generation of content, such as in the form of text, audio, images or video, that can readily accommodate a wide range of distinctive tasks.
(100)
Meta mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jiġi integrat f'sistema tal-IA jew jifforma parti minnha, jenħtieġ li din is-sistema titqies bħala sistema tal-IA bi skop ġenerali meta, minħabba din l-integrazzjoni, din is-sistema jkollha l-kapaċità li taqdi varjetà ta' skopijiet. Sistema tal-IA bi skop ġenerali tista' tintuża direttament, jew tista' tkun integrata f'sistemi oħra tal-IA.
(100)
When a general-purpose AI model is integrated into or forms part of an AI system, this system should be considered to be general-purpose AI system when, due to this integration, this system has the capability to serve a variety of purposes. A general-purpose AI system can be used directly, or it may be integrated into other AI systems.
(101)
Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għandhom rwol u responsabbiltà partikolari tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA, peress li l-mudelli li jipprovdu jistgħu jiffurmaw il-bażi għal firxa ta' sistemi downstream, spiss ipprovduti minn fornituri downstream li jeħtieġu għarfien tajjeb tal-mudelli u tal-kapaċitajiet tagħhom, kemm biex jippermettu l-integrazzjoni ta' mudelli bħal dawn fil-prodotti tagħhom, kif ukoll biex jissodisfaw l-obbligi tagħhom skont dan ir-regolament jew skont regolamenti oħra. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jiġu stabbiliti miżuri proporzjonati ta' trasparenza, inkluż it-tfassil u ż-żamma aġġornata tad-dokumentazzjoni, u l-għoti ta' informazzjoni dwar il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għall-użu tiegħu mill-fornituri downstream. Jenħtieġ li d-dokumentazzjoni teknika titħejja u tinżamm aġġornata mill-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali bl-għan li ssir disponibbli, fuq talba, għall-Uffiċċju għall-IA u għall-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti. Jenħtieġ li s-sett minimu ta' elementi li għandhom jiġu inklużi f'tali dokumentazzjoni jiġi stipulat fl-annessi speċifiċi ta' dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tingħata s-setgħa li temenda dawk l-annessi permezz ta' atti delegati fid-dawl tal-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi li qed jevolvu.
(101)
Providers of general-purpose AI models have a particular role and responsibility along the AI value chain, as the models they provide may form the basis for a range of downstream systems, often provided by downstream providers that necessitate a good understanding of the models and their capabilities, both to enable the integration of such models into their products, and to fulfil their obligations under this or other regulations. Therefore, proportionate transparency measures should be laid down, including the drawing up and keeping up to date of documentation, and the provision of information on the general-purpose AI model for its usage by the downstream providers. Technical documentation should be prepared and kept up to date by the general-purpose AI model provider for the purpose of making it available, upon request, to the AI Office and the national competent authorities. The minimal set of elements to be included in such documentation should be set out in specific annexes to this Regulation. The Commission should be empowered to amend those annexes by means of delegated acts in light of evolving technological developments.
(102)
Software u data, inkluż mudelli, rilaxxati taħt liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ li tippermettilhom jiġu kondiviżi b'mod miftuħ u fejn l-utenti jistgħu jaċċessaw, jużaw, jimmodifikaw u jiddistribwixxu mill-ġdid liberament il-verżjonijiet tagħhom jew il-verżjonijiet modifikati tagħhom, jistgħu jikkontribwixxu għar-riċerka u l-innovazzjoni fis-suq u jistgħu jipprovdu opportunitajiet sinifikanti ta' tkabbir għall-ekonomija tal-Unjoni. Jenħtieġ li jiġu kkunsidrati mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali rilaxxati b'liċenzji liberi u b'sors miftuħ biex jiġu żgurati livelli għoljin ta' trasparenza u ftuħ jekk il-parametri tagħhom, inkluż il-piżijiet, l-informazzjoni dwar l-arkitettura tal-mudell, u l-informazzjoni dwar l-użu tal-mudell ikunu disponibbli għall-pubbliku. Jenħtieġ li l-liċenzja titqies b'liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ anke meta tippermetti lill-utenti jaħdmu, jikkupjaw, jiddistribwixxu, jistudjaw, jibdlu u jtejbu s-software u d-data, inkluż mudelli bil-kundizzjoni li l-fornitur oriġinali tal-mudell jiġi kkreditat u li jiġu rrispettati t-termini identiċi jew komparabbli tad-distribuzzjoni.
(102)
Software and data, including models, released under a free and open-source licence that allows them to be openly shared and where users can freely access, use, modify and redistribute them or modified versions thereof, can contribute to research and innovation in the market and can provide significant growth opportunities for the Union economy. General-purpose AI models released under free and open-source licences should be considered to ensure high levels of transparency and openness if their parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage are made publicly available. The licence should be considered to be free and open-source also when it allows users to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve software and data, including models under the condition that the original provider of the model is credited, the identical or comparable terms of distribution are respected.
(103)
Komponenti tal-IA b'liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ ikopru s-software u d-data, inkluż mudelli u mudelli, għodod, servizzi jew proċessi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ta' sistema tal-IA. Komponenti tal-IA b'liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ jistgħu jiġu pprovduti permezz ta' kanali differenti, inkluż l-iżvilupp tagħhom f'repożitorji miftuħa. Għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-komponenti tal-IA li jiġu pprovduti bi ħlas jew monetizzati b'xi mod ieħor, inkluż bil-forniment ta' appoġġ tekniku jew servizzi oħra, fosthom permezz ta' pjattaforma tas-software, relatati mal-komponent tal-IA, jew l-użu ta' data personali għal raġunijiet għajr esklużivament għat-titjib tas-sigurtà, il-kompatibbiltà jew l-interoperabbiltà tas-software, bl-eċċezzjoni ta' tranżazzjonijiet bejn mikroimpriżi, ma jibbenefikawx mill-eċċezzjonijiet ipprovduti għall-komponenti tal-IA b'liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ. Jenħtieġ li fih innifsu, il-fatt li l-komponenti tal-IA jsiru disponibbli permezz ta' repożitorji miftuħa ma jikkostitwixxix monetizzazzjoni.
(103)
Free and open-source AI components covers the software and data, including models and general-purpose AI models, tools, services or processes of an AI system. Free and open-source AI components can be provided through different channels, including their development on open repositories. For the purposes of this Regulation, AI components that are provided against a price or otherwise monetised, including through the provision of technical support or other services, including through a software platform, related to the AI component, or the use of personal data for reasons other than exclusively for improving the security, compatibility or interoperability of the software, with the exception of transactions between microenterprises, should not benefit from the exceptions provided to free and open-source AI components. The fact of making AI components available through open repositories should not, in itself, constitute a monetisation.
(104)
Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jiġu rilaxxati b'liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ, u li l-parametri tagħhom, inkluż il-piżijiet, l-informazzjoni dwar l-arkitettura tal-mudell, u l-informazzjoni dwar l-użu tal-mudell, isiru disponibbli għall-pubbliku, jenħtieġ li jkunu soġġetti għal eċċezzjonijiet fir-rigward tar-rekwiżiti relatati mat-trasparenza imposti fuq il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, sakemm ma jkunux jistgħu jitqiesu li jippreżentaw riskju sistemiku, f'liema każ iċ-ċirkostanza li l-mudell ikun trasparenti u akkumpanjat minn liċenzja b'sors miftuħ jenħtieġ li ma titqiesx bħala raġuni suffiċjenti biex tiġi eskluża l-konformità mal-obbligi skont dan ir-Regolament. Fi kwalunkwe każ, minħabba li r-rilaxx ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'liċenzja libera u b'sors miftuħ mhux neċessarjament jiżvela informazzjoni sostanzjali dwar is-sett tad-data użat għat-taħriġ jew għall-irfinar tal-mudell u dwar kif b'hekk ġiet żgurata l-konformità mal-liġi dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur, jenħtieġ li l-eċċezzjoni prevista għall-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali mill-konformità mar-rekwiżiti relatati mat-trasparenza ma tikkonċernax l-obbligu li jingħata sommarju dwar il-kontenut użat għat-taħriġ tal-mudell u l-obbligu li tiġi stabbilita politika ta' konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur, b'mod partikolari biex tiġi identifikata u konformi mar-riżerva tad-drittijiet skont l-Artikolu 4(3) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2019/790 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (40).
(104)
The providers of general-purpose AI models that are released under a free and open-source licence, and whose parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage, are made publicly available should be subject to exceptions as regards the transparency-related requirements imposed on general-purpose AI models, unless they can be considered to present a systemic risk, in which case the circumstance that the model is transparent and accompanied by an open-source license should not be considered to be a sufficient reason to exclude compliance with the obligations under this Regulation. In any case, given that the release of general-purpose AI models under free and open-source licence does not necessarily reveal substantial information on the data set used for the training or fine-tuning of the model and on how compliance of copyright law was thereby ensured, the exception provided for general-purpose AI models from compliance with the transparency-related requirements should not concern the obligation to produce a summary about the content used for model training and the obligation to put in place a policy to comply with Union copyright law, in particular to identify and comply with the reservation of rights pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council (40).
(105)
Il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, b'mod partikolari mudelli tal-IA ġenerattivi kbar, li kapaċi jiġġeneraw test, immaġnijiet, u kontenut ieħor, jippreżentaw opportunitajiet uniċi ta' innovazzjoni iżda wkoll sfidi għall-artisti, l-awturi, u kreaturi oħra u l-mod kif il-kontenut kreattiv tagħhom jinħoloq, jitqassam, jintuża u jiġi kkunsmat. L-iżvilupp u t-taħriġ ta' mudelli bħal dawn jeħtieġu aċċess għal ammonti kbar ta' testi, immaġnijiet, vidjows, u data oħra. It-tekniki tal-estrazzjoni tat-test u tad-data jistgħu jintużaw b'mod estensiv f'dan il-kuntest għall-irkupru u l-analiżi ta' tali kontenut, li jista' jiġi protett bid-drittijiet tal-awtur u bi drittijiet relatati. Kwalunkwe użu ta' kontenut protett bid-drittijiet tal-awtur jeħtieġ l-awtorizzazzjoni tad-detentur tad-drittijiet ikkonċernat sakemm ma japplikawx eċċezzjonijiet u limitazzjonijiet rilevanti tad-drittijiet tal-awtur. Id-Direttiva (UE) 2019/790 introduċiet eċċezzjonijiet u limitazzjonijiet li jippermettu r-riproduzzjonijiet u l-estrazzjonijiet ta' xogħlijiet jew materjal ieħor, għall-fini tal-estrazzjoni tat-test u tad-data, taħt ċerti kundizzjonijiet. Skont dawn ir-regoli, id-detenturi tad-drittijiet jistgħu jagħżlu li jirriżervaw id-drittijiet tagħhom fuq ix-xogħlijiet jew materjal ieħor tagħhom biex jipprevjenu l-estrazzjoni tat-test u tad-data, sakemm dan ma jsirx għall-finijiet ta' riċerka xjentifika. Meta d-drittijiet ta' nonparteċipazzjoni jkunu ġew espressament riżervati b'mod xieraq, il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jeħtieġ li jiksbu awtorizzazzjoni mid-detenturi tad-drittijiet jekk ikunu jridu jwettqu estrazzjoni tat-test u tad-data fuq tali xogħlijiet.
(105)
General-purpose AI models, in particular large generative AI models, capable of generating text, images, and other content, present unique innovation opportunities but also challenges to artists, authors, and other creators and the way their creative content is created, distributed, used and consumed. The development and training of such models require access to vast amounts of text, images, videos and other data. Text and data mining techniques may be used extensively in this context for the retrieval and analysis of such content, which may be protected by copyright and related rights. Any use of copyright protected content requires the authorisation of the rightsholder concerned unless relevant copyright exceptions and limitations apply. Directive (EU) 2019/790 introduced exceptions and limitations allowing reproductions and extractions of works or other subject matter, for the purpose of text and data mining, under certain conditions. Under these rules, rightsholders may choose to reserve their rights over their works or other subject matter to prevent text and data mining, unless this is done for the purposes of scientific research. Where the rights to opt out has been expressly reserved in an appropriate manner, providers of general-purpose AI models need to obtain an authorisation from rightsholders if they want to carry out text and data mining over such works.
(106)
Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri li jintroduċu mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali fis-suq tal-Unjoni jiżguraw il-konformità mal-obbligi rilevanti f'dan ir-Regolament. Għal dak l-għan, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistabbilixxu politika biex jikkonformaw mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur u drittijiet relatati, b'mod partikolari biex jidentifikaw u jikkonformaw mar-riżerva tad-drittijiet espressa mid-detenturi tad-drittijiet skont l-Artikolu 4(3) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2019/790. Jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe fornitur li jintroduċi mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali fis-suq tal-Unjoni jikkonforma ma' dan l-obbligu, irrispettivament mill-ġuriżdizzjoni li fiha jseħħu l-atti rilevanti għad-drittijiet tal-awtur li jirfdu t-taħriġ ta' dawk il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Dan huwa meħtieġ biex jiġu żgurati kundizzjonijiet ekwi fost il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali meta l-ebda fornitur ma jkun jista' jikseb vantaġġ kompetittiv fis-suq tal-Unjoni billi japplika standards tad-drittijiet tal-awtur aktar baxxi minn dawk ipprovduti fl-Unjoni.
(106)
Providers that place general-purpose AI models on the Union market should ensure compliance with the relevant obligations in this Regulation. To that end, providers of general-purpose AI models should put in place a policy to comply with Union law on copyright and related rights, in particular to identify and comply with the reservation of rights expressed by rightsholders pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/790. Any provider placing a general-purpose AI model on the Union market should comply with this obligation, regardless of the jurisdiction in which the copyright-relevant acts underpinning the training of those general-purpose AI models take place. This is necessary to ensure a level playing field among providers of general-purpose AI models where no provider should be able to gain a competitive advantage in the Union market by applying lower copyright standards than those provided in the Union.
(107)
Sabiex tiżdied it-trasparenza dwar id-data li tintuża fit-taħriġ minn qabel u fit-taħriġ ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, inkluż it-test u d-data protetti mil-liġi dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur, huwa xieraq li l-fornituri ta' tali mudelli jfasslu u jagħmlu disponibbli għall-pubbliku sommarju dettaljat biżżejjed tal-kontenut użat għat-taħriġ tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Filwaqt li titqies kif xieraq il-ħtieġa li jiġu protetti s-sigrieti kummerċjali u l-informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali, jenħtieġ li dan is-sommarju jkun ġeneralment komprensiv fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tiegħu minflok ma jkun teknikament dettaljat biex jiffaċilita lill-partijiet b'interessi leġittimi, inkluż id-detenturi tad-drittijiet tal-awtur, biex jeżerċitaw u jinfurzaw id-drittijiet tagħhom skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni, pereżempju billi jelenka l-ġabriet jew is-settijiet ewlenin tad-data li jkunu ħarrġu l-mudell, bħal bażijiet tad-data privati jew pubbliċi kbar jew arkivji tad-data, u billi jipprovdi spjegazzjoni narrattiva dwar sorsi oħra ta' data użati. Huwa xieraq li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jipprovdi mudell għas-sommarju, li jenħtieġ li jkun sempliċi, effettiv, u jippermetti lill-fornitur jipprovdi s-sommarju meħtieġ f'forma narrattiva.
(107)
In order to increase transparency on the data that is used in the pre-training and training of general-purpose AI models, including text and data protected by copyright law, it is adequate that providers of such models draw up and make publicly available a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used for training the general-purpose AI model. While taking into due account the need to protect trade secrets and confidential business information, this summary should be generally comprehensive in its scope instead of technically detailed to facilitate parties with legitimate interests, including copyright holders, to exercise and enforce their rights under Union law, for example by listing the main data collections or sets that went into training the model, such as large private or public databases or data archives, and by providing a narrative explanation about other data sources used. It is appropriate for the AI Office to provide a template for the summary, which should be simple, effective, and allow the provider to provide the required summary in narrative form.
(108)
Fir-rigward tal-obbligi imposti fuq il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali biex jistabbilixxu politika biex jikkonformaw mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur u jagħmlu disponibbli għall-pubbliku sommarju tal-kontenut użat għat-taħriġ, jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jimmonitorja jekk il-fornitur ikunx issodisfa dawk l-obbligi mingħajr ma jivverifika jew jipproċedi biex jivvaluta wieħed wieħed kull xogħol tad-data tat-taħriġ fir-rigward tal-konformità mad-drittijiet tal-awtur. Dan ir-Regolament ma jaffettwax l-infurzar tar-regoli dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur kif previst fil-liġi tal-Unjoni.
(108)
With regard to the obligations imposed on providers of general-purpose AI models to put in place a policy to comply with Union copyright law and make publicly available a summary of the content used for the training, the AI Office should monitor whether the provider has fulfilled those obligations without verifying or proceeding to a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. This Regulation does not affect the enforcement of copyright rules as provided for under Union law.
(109)
Jenħtieġ li l-konformità mal-obbligi applikabbli għall-fornituri tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali tkun proporzjonata għat-tip ta' fornitur tal-mudell, bl-esklużjoni tal-ħtieġa ta' konformità għall-persuni li jiżviluppaw jew jużaw mudelli għal skopijiet ta' riċerka mhux professjonali jew xjentifika, li madankollu jenħtieġ li jiġu mħeġġa jikkonformaw b'mod volontarju ma' dawn ir-rekwiżiti. Mingħajr preġudizzju għal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur, jenħtieġ li l-konformità ma' dawk l-obbligi tqis kif xieraq id-daqs tal-fornitur u tippermetti modi simplifikati ta' konformità għall-SMEs inkluż in-negozji ġodda, li jenħtieġ li ma jirrappreżentawx kost eċċessiv u ma jiskoraġġixxux l-użu ta' tali mudelli. Fil-każ ta' modifika jew irfinar ta' mudell, jenħtieġ li l-obbligi għall-fornituri ta’ mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jkunu limitati għal dik il-modifika jew irfinar, pereżempju billi d-dokumentazzjoni teknika diġà eżistenti tiġi kkomplementata b'informazzjoni dwar il-modifiki, inkluż sorsi ġodda ta' data tat-taħriġ, bħala mezz biex jikkonformaw mal-obbligi tal-katina tal-valur previsti f'dan ir-Regolament.
(109)
Compliance with the obligations applicable to the providers of general-purpose AI models should be commensurate and proportionate to the type of model provider, excluding the need for compliance for persons who develop or use models for non-professional or scientific research purposes, who should nevertheless be encouraged to voluntarily comply with these requirements. Without prejudice to Union copyright law, compliance with those obligations should take due account of the size of the provider and allow simplified ways of compliance for SMEs, including start-ups, that should not represent an excessive cost and not discourage the use of such models. In the case of a modification or fine-tuning of a model, the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models should be limited to that modification or fine-tuning, for example by complementing the already existing technical documentation with information on the modifications, including new training data sources, as a means to comply with the value chain obligations provided in this Regulation.
(110)
Il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu joħolqu riskji sistemiċi li jinkludu, iżda mhumiex limitati għal, kwalunkwe effett negattiv reali jew raġonevolment prevedibbli fir-rigward ta' aċċidenti kbar, tfixkil ta' setturi kritiċi u konsegwenzi serji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza pubblika; kwalunkwe effett negattiv attwali jew raġonevolment prevedibbli fuq il-proċessi demokratiċi, is-sigurtà pubblika u ekonomika; id-disseminazzjoni ta' kontenut illegali, falz jew diskriminatorju. Ir-riskji sistemiċi jenħtieġ li jinftiehmu li jiżdiedu bil-kapaċitajiet tal-mudell u l-kopertura tal-mudell, jistgħu jinħolqu tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja kollu tal-mudell, u huma influwenzati minn kundizzjonijiet ta' użu ħażin, l-affidabbiltà tal-mudell, l-imparzjalità tal-mudell u sigurtà tal-mudell, il-livell ta' awtonomija tal-mudell, l-aċċess tiegħu għal għodod, modalitajiet ġodda jew ikkombinati, strateġiji ta' rilaxx u distribuzzjoni, il-potenzjal li jitneħħew il-konfini u fatturi oħra. B'mod partikolari, l-approċċi internazzjonali s'issa identifikaw il-ħtieġa li tingħata attenzjoni għar-riskji minn użu ħażin intenzjonat potenzjali jew kwistjonijiet mhux intenzjonati ta' kontroll relatati mal-allinjament mal-intenzjoni tal-bniedem; riskji kimiċi, bijoloġiċi, radjoloġiċi u nukleari, bħall-modi li bihom jistgħu jitnaqqsu l-ostakli għad-dħul, inkluż għall-iżvilupp, l-akkwist tad-disinn, jew l-użu tal-armi; kapaċitajiet ċibernetiċi offensivi, bħall-modi ta' skoperta tal-vulnerabbiltà, l-isfruttament, jew l-użu operazzjonali jistgħu jiġu attivati; l-effetti tal-interazzjoni u l-użu tal-għodda, inkluż pereżempju l-kapaċità li jiġu kkontrollati s-sistemi fiżiċi u ssir interferenza mal-infrastruttura kritika; riskji minn mudelli li jipproduċu kopji tagħhom infushom jew li jagħmlu “awtoreplikazzjoni” jew iħarrġu mudelli oħrajn; il-modi li bihom il-mudelli jistgħu jwasslu għal preġudizzju ta' ħsara u diskriminazzjoni b'riskji għall-individwi, il-komunitajiet jew is-soċjetajiet; il-faċilitazzjoni tad-diżinformazzjoni jew il-ħsara lill-privatezza b'theddid għall-valuri demokratiċi u d-drittijiet tal-bniedem; riskju li avveniment partikolari jista' jwassal għal reazzjoni katina b'effetti negattivi konsiderevoli li jistgħu jaffettwaw sa belt sħiħa, attività ta' dominju sħiħ jew komunità sħiħa.
(110)
General-purpose AI models could pose systemic risks which include, but are not limited to, any actual or reasonably foreseeable negative effects in relation to major accidents, disruptions of critical sectors and serious consequences to public health and safety; any actual or reasonably foreseeable negative effects on democratic processes, public and economic security; the dissemination of illegal, false, or discriminatory content. Systemic risks should be understood to increase with model capabilities and model reach, can arise along the entire lifecycle of the model, and are influenced by conditions of misuse, model reliability, model fairness and model security, the level of autonomy of the model, its access to tools, novel or combined modalities, release and distribution strategies, the potential to remove guardrails and other factors. In particular, international approaches have so far identified the need to pay attention to risks from potential intentional misuse or unintended issues of control relating to alignment with human intent; chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear risks, such as the ways in which barriers to entry can be lowered, including for weapons development, design acquisition, or use; offensive cyber capabilities, such as the ways in vulnerability discovery, exploitation, or operational use can be enabled; the effects of interaction and tool use, including for example the capacity to control physical systems and interfere with critical infrastructure; risks from models of making copies of themselves or ‘self-replicating’ or training other models; the ways in which models can give rise to harmful bias and discrimination with risks to individuals, communities or societies; the facilitation of disinformation or harming privacy with threats to democratic values and human rights; risk that a particular event could lead to a chain reaction with considerable negative effects that could affect up to an entire city, an entire domain activity or an entire community.
(111)
Huwa xieraq li tiġi stabbilita metodoloġija għall-klassifikazzjoni tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali bħala mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi. Peress li r-riskji sistemiċi jirriżultaw minn kapaċitajiet partikolarment għoljin, jenħtieġ li l-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jitqies li jippreżenta riskji sistemiċi jekk ikollu kapaċitajiet b'impatt għoli, evalwati abbażi ta' għodod u metodoloġiji tekniċi xierqa, jew impatt sinifikanti fuq is-suq intern minħabba l-kopertura tiegħu. Kapaċitajiet b'impatt kbir f'mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali tfisser kapaċitajiet li jaqblu mal-kapaċitajiet irreġistrati fl-aktar mudelli avvanzati tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jew jaqbżuhom. Il-firxa sħiħa ta' kapaċitajiet f'mudell tista' tinftiehem aħjar wara l-introduzzjoni tiegħu fis-suq jew meta l-implimentaturi jinteraġixxu mal-mudell. Skont l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku fil-mument tad-dħul fis-seħħ ta' dan ir-Regolament, l-ammont kumulattiv ta' komputazzjoni użat għat-taħriġ tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali mkejjel f'operazzjonijiet b'punt varjabbli huwa wieħed mill-approssimazzjonijiet rilevanti għall-kapaċitajiet tal-mudell. L-ammont kumulattiv ta’ komputazzjoni użat għat-taħriġ jinkludi l-komputazzjoni użata fl-attivitajiet u l-metodi kollha li huma maħsuba biex itejbu l-kapaċitajiet tal-mudell qabel l-implimentazzjoni, bħal taħriġ minn qabel, ġenerazzjoni ta' data sintetika u rfinar. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li jiġi stabbilit limitu inizjali tal-operazzjonijiet b'punt varjabbli, li, jekk jiġi ssodisfat minn mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, iwassal għal preżunzjoni li l-mudell huwa mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi. Jenħtieġ li dan il-limitu jiġi aġġustat maż-żmien biex jirrifletti l-bidliet teknoloġiċi u industrijali, bħat-titjib algoritmiku jew żieda fl-effiċjenza tal-hardware, u jenħtieġ li jiġi ssupplimentat b'parametri referenzjarji u indikaturi għall-kapaċità tal-mudell. Biex jikkontribwixxi għal dan, jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jinvolvi ruħu mal-komunità xjentifika, l-industrija, is-soċjetà ċivili u esperti oħra. Jenħtieġ li l-limiti, kif ukoll l-għodod u l-parametri referenzjarji għall-valutazzjoni ta' kapaċitajiet b'impatt għoli, ikunu jistgħu jbassru sew il-ġeneralità, il-kapaċitajiet u r-riskju sistemiku assoċjat ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, u jistgħu jqisu l-mod kif il-mudell ser jiġi introdott fis-suq jew l-għadd ta' utenti li jista' jaffettwa. Biex tikkomplementa din is-sistema, jenħtieġ ikun hemm il-possibbiltà li l-Kummissjoni tieħu deċiżjonijiet individwali li jiddeżinjaw mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku jekk jinstab li tali mudell għandu kapaċitajiet jew impatt ekwivalenti għal dawk koperti mil-livell limitu stabbilit. Jenħtieġ li dik id-deċiżjoni tittieħed abbażi ta' valutazzjoni ġenerali tal-kriterji għad-deżinjazzjoni ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku stipulat f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, bħall-kwalità jew id-daqs tas-sett tad-data tat-taħriġ, l-għadd ta' negozji u utenti finali, il-modalitajiet tal-input u tal-output tiegħu, il-livell ta' awtonomija u skalabbiltà tiegħu, jew l-għodod li għandu aċċess għalihom. Fuq talba motivata ta' fornitur li l-mudell tiegħu jkun ġie ddeżinjat bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tqis it-talba u tista' tiddeċiedi li tivvaluta mill-ġdid jekk il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għadux jista' jitqies li jippreżenta riskji sistemiċi.
(111)
It is appropriate to establish a methodology for the classification of general-purpose AI models as general-purpose AI model with systemic risks. Since systemic risks result from particularly high capabilities, a general-purpose AI model should be considered to present systemic risks if it has high-impact capabilities, evaluated on the basis of appropriate technical tools and methodologies, or significant impact on the internal market due to its reach. High-impact capabilities in general-purpose AI models means capabilities that match or exceed the capabilities recorded in the most advanced general-purpose AI models. The full range of capabilities in a model could be better understood after its placing on the market or when deployers interact with the model. According to the state of the art at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, the cumulative amount of computation used for the training of the general-purpose AI model measured in floating point operations is one of the relevant approximations for model capabilities. The cumulative amount of computation used for training includes the computation used across the activities and methods that are intended to enhance the capabilities of the model prior to deployment, such as pre-training, synthetic data generation and fine-tuning. Therefore, an initial threshold of floating point operations should be set, which, if met by a general-purpose AI model, leads to a presumption that the model is a general-purpose AI model with systemic risks. This threshold should be adjusted over time to reflect technological and industrial changes, such as algorithmic improvements or increased hardware efficiency, and should be supplemented with benchmarks and indicators for model capability. To inform this, the AI Office should engage with the scientific community, industry, civil society and other experts. Thresholds, as well as tools and benchmarks for the assessment of high-impact capabilities, should be strong predictors of generality, its capabilities and associated systemic risk of general-purpose AI models, and could take into account the way the model will be placed on the market or the number of users it may affect. To complement this system, there should be a possibility for the Commission to take individual decisions designating a general-purpose AI model as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk if it is found that such model has capabilities or an impact equivalent to those captured by the set threshold. That decision should be taken on the basis of an overall assessment of the criteria for the designation of a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk set out in an annex to this Regulation, such as quality or size of the training data set, number of business and end users, its input and output modalities, its level of autonomy and scalability, or the tools it has access to. Upon a reasoned request of a provider whose model has been designated as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk, the Commission should take the request into account and may decide to reassess whether the general-purpose AI model can still be considered to present systemic risks.
(112)
Jeħtieġ ukoll li tiġi ċċarata proċedura għall-klassifikazzjoni ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi. Jenħtieġ li mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jissodisfa l-limitu applikabbli għal kapaċitajiet b'impatt għoli jitqies li huwa mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku. Jenħtieġ li l-fornitur jinnotifika lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA mhux aktar tard minn ġimagħtejn wara li jiġu ssodisfati r-rekwiżiti jew isir magħruf li mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ser jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti li jwasslu għall-preżunzjoni. Dan huwa partikolarment rilevanti fir-rigward tal-limitu tal-operazzjonijiet b'punt varjabbli minħabba li t-taħriġ ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jirrikjedi ippjanar konsiderevoli li jinkludi l-allokazzjoni bil-quddiem tar-riżorsi tal-komputazzjoni u, għalhekk, il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu jkunu jafu jekk il-mudell tagħhom jilħaqx il-limitu qabel ma jitlesta t-taħriġ. Fil-kuntest ta' dik in-notifika, jenħtieġ li l-fornitur ikun jista' juri li minħabba l-karatteristiċi speċifiċi tiegħu, mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'mod eċċezzjonali ma jippreżentax riskji sistemiċi, u li għalhekk jenħtieġ li ma jiġix ikklassifikat bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi. Dik l-informazzjoni hija siewja għall-Uffiċċju għall-IA biex jantiċipa l-introduzzjoni fis-suq ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi u l-fornituri jistgħu jibdew jinvolvu ruħhom mal-Uffiċċju għall-IA minn kmieni. Dik l-informazzjoni hija partikolarment importanti fir-rigward tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li huma ppjanati li jiġu rilaxxati bħala sors miftuħ, minħabba li, wara r-rilaxx tal-mudell b'sors miftuħ, il-miżuri meħtieġa biex tiġi żgurata l-konformità mal-obbligi skont dan ir-Regolament jistgħu jkunu aktar diffiċli biex jiġu implimentati.
(112)
It is also necessary to clarify a procedure for the classification of a general-purpose AI model with systemic risks. A general-purpose AI model that meets the applicable threshold for high-impact capabilities should be presumed to be a general-purpose AI models with systemic risk. The provider should notify the AI Office at the latest two weeks after the requirements are met or it becomes known that a general-purpose AI model will meet the requirements that lead to the presumption. This is especially relevant in relation to the threshold of floating point operations because training of general-purpose AI models takes considerable planning which includes the upfront allocation of compute resources and, therefore, providers of general-purpose AI models are able to know if their model would meet the threshold before the training is completed. In the context of that notification, the provider should be able to demonstrate that, because of its specific characteristics, a general-purpose AI model exceptionally does not present systemic risks, and that it thus should not be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risks. That information is valuable for the AI Office to anticipate the placing on the market of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks and the providers can start to engage with the AI Office early on. That information is especially important with regard to general-purpose AI models that are planned to be released as open-source, given that, after the open-source model release, necessary measures to ensure compliance with the obligations under this Regulation may be more difficult to implement.
(113)
Jekk il-Kummissjoni ssir taf bil-fatt li mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti biex jiġi kklassifikat bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, li qabel jew ma kienx magħruf jew li l-fornitur rilevanti naqas milli jinnotifika lill-Kummissjoni, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tingħata s-setgħa li tiddeżinjah bħala tali. Jenħtieġ li jkun hemm sistema ta' allerti kwalifikati li tiżgura li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jiġi mgħarraf mill-bord b'mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li x'aktarx għandhom jiġu kklassifikati bħala mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, minbarra l-attivitajiet ta' monitoraġġ tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA.
(113)
If the Commission becomes aware of the fact that a general-purpose AI model meets the requirements to classify as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk, which previously had either not been known or of which the relevant provider has failed to notify the Commission, the Commission should be empowered to designate it so. A system of qualified alerts should ensure that the AI Office is made aware by the scientific panel of general-purpose AI models that should possibly be classified as general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, in addition to the monitoring activities of the AI Office.
(114)
Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jippreżentaw riskji sistemiċi jkunu soġġetti, minbarra l-obbligi previsti għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, għal obbligi mmirati lejn l-identifikazzjoni u l-mitigazzjoni ta' dawk ir-riskji u l-iżgurar ta' livell adegwat ta' protezzjoni taċ-ċibersigurtà, irrispettivament minn jekk jiġix ipprovdut bħala mudell awtonomu jew inkorporat f'sistema tal-IA jew fi prodott. Sabiex jintlaħqu dawk l-objettivi, jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament jirrikjedi li l-fornituri jwettqu l-evalwazzjonijiet tal-mudell meħtieġa, b'mod partikolari qabel l-ewwel introduzzjoni tiegħu fis-suq, inkluż it-twettiq u d-dokumentazzjoni tal-ittestjar kontradittorju tal-mudelli, anke, kif xieraq, permezz ta' ttestjar intern jew indipendenti estern. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi jivvalutaw u jimmitigaw kontinwament ir-riskji sistemiċi, inkluż pereżempju billi jistabbilixxu politiki ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju, bħal proċessi ta' responsabbiltà u governanza, jimplimentaw sorveljanza ta' wara l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, jieħdu miżuri xierqa tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja kollu tal-mudell u jikkooperaw ma' atturi rilevanti tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA.
(114)
The providers of general-purpose AI models presenting systemic risks should be subject, in addition to the obligations provided for providers of general-purpose AI models, to obligations aimed at identifying and mitigating those risks and ensuring an adequate level of cybersecurity protection, regardless of whether it is provided as a standalone model or embedded in an AI system or a product. To achieve those objectives, this Regulation should require providers to perform the necessary model evaluations, in particular prior to its first placing on the market, including conducting and documenting adversarial testing of models, also, as appropriate, through internal or independent external testing. In addition, providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks should continuously assess and mitigate systemic risks, including for example by putting in place risk-management policies, such as accountability and governance processes, implementing post-market monitoring, taking appropriate measures along the entire model’s lifecycle and cooperating with relevant actors along the AI value chain.
(115)
Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi jivvalutaw u jimmitigaw ir-riskji sistemiċi possibbli. Jekk, minkejja l-isforzi biex jiġu identifikati u evitati riskji relatati ma' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jista' jippreżenta riskji sistemiċi, l-iżvilupp jew l-użu tal-mudell jikkawża inċident serju, jenħtieġ li l-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali mingħajr dewmien żejjed iżomm rekord tal-inċident u jirrapporta kwalunkwe informazzjoni rilevanti u miżuri korrettiva possibbli lill-Kummissjoni u lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri jiżguraw livell adegwat ta' protezzjoni taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-mudell u l-infrastruttura fiżika tiegħu, jekk ikun xieraq, tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja kollu tal-mudell. Jenħtieġ li l-protezzjoni taċ-ċibersigurtà relatata mar-riskji sistemiċi assoċjati mal-użu malizzjuż ta' mudell jew attakki tqis kif xieraq ir-rilaxx aċċidentali minn mudell, ir-rilaxxi mhux awtorizzati, iċ-ċirkomvenzjoni tal-miżuri ta' sikurezza, u d-difiża kontra l-attakki ċibernetiċi, l-aċċess mhux awtorizzat jew is-serq tal-mudell. Dik il-protezzjoni tista' tiġi ffaċilitata billi jiġu żgurati piżijiet tal-mudell, algoritmi, servers, u settijiet ta' data, pereżempju permezz ta' miżuri ta' sigurtà operazzjonali għas-sigurtà tal-informazzjoni, politiki speċifiċi dwar iċ-ċibersigurtà, soluzzjonijiet tekniċi u stabbiliti adegwati, u kontrolli tal-aċċess ċibernetiku u fiżiku, adattati għaċ-ċirkostanzi rilevanti u r-riskji involuti.
(115)
Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks should assess and mitigate possible systemic risks. If, despite efforts to identify and prevent risks related to a general-purpose AI model that may present systemic risks, the development or use of the model causes a serious incident, the general-purpose AI model provider should without undue delay keep track of the incident and report any relevant information and possible corrective measures to the Commission and national competent authorities. Furthermore, providers should ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity protection for the model and its physical infrastructure, if appropriate, along the entire model lifecycle. Cybersecurity protection related to systemic risks associated with malicious use or attacks should duly consider accidental model leakage, unauthorised releases, circumvention of safety measures, and defence against cyberattacks, unauthorised access or model theft. That protection could be facilitated by securing model weights, algorithms, servers, and data sets, such as through operational security measures for information security, specific cybersecurity policies, adequate technical and established solutions, and cyber and physical access controls, appropriate to the relevant circumstances and the risks involved.
(116)
Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jħeġġeġ u jiffaċilita t-tfassil, ir-rieżami u l-adattament tal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika, filwaqt li jqis l-approċċi internazzjonali. Il-fornituri kollha ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu jiġu mistiedna jipparteċipaw. Biex jiġi żgurat li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jirriflettu l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku u jqisu kif xieraq sett varjat ta' perspettivi, jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jikkollabora mal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti rilevanti, u jista', fejn xieraq, jikkonsulta mal-organizzazzjonijiet tas-soċjetà ċivili u partijiet ikkonċernati u esperti rilevanti oħra, inkluż il-bord, għat-tfassil ta' tali kodiċijiet. Jenħtieġ li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jkopru l-obbligi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jippreżentaw riskji sistemiċi. Barra minn hekk, fir-rigward tar-riskji sistemiċi, jenħtieġ li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jgħinu biex tiġi stabbilita tassonomija tar-riskju tat-tip u n-natura tar-riskji sistemiċi fil-livell tal-Unjoni, inkluż is-sorsi tagħhom. Jenħtieġ li l-Kodiċijiet ta' Prattika jkunu ffukati wkoll fuq valutazzjoni tar-riskju speċifika u miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni.
(116)
The AI Office should encourage and facilitate the drawing up, review and adaptation of codes of practice, taking into account international approaches. All providers of general-purpose AI models could be invited to participate. To ensure that the codes of practice reflect the state of the art and duly take into account a diverse set of perspectives, the AI Office should collaborate with relevant national competent authorities, and could, where appropriate, consult with civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders and experts, including the Scientific Panel, for the drawing up of such codes. Codes of practice should cover obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models and of general-purpose AI models presenting systemic risks. In addition, as regards systemic risks, codes of practice should help to establish a risk taxonomy of the type and nature of the systemic risks at Union level, including their sources. Codes of practice should also be focused on specific risk assessment and mitigation measures.
(117)
Jenħtieġ li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jirrappreżentaw għodda ċentrali għall-konformità xierqa mal-obbligi previsti skont dan ir-Regolament għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri jkunu jistgħu jiddependu fuq kodiċijiet ta' prattika biex juru l-konformità mal-obbligi. Permezz ta' atti ta' implimentazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni tista' tiddeċiedi li tapprova kodiċi ta' prattika u tagħtih validità ġenerali fl-Unjoni, jew, alternattivament, li tipprovdi regoli komuni għall-implimentazzjoni tal-obbligi rilevanti, jekk, sa meta dan ir-Regolament isir applikabbli, kodiċi ta' prattika ma jkunx jista' jiġi ffinalizzat jew ma jitqiesx adegwat mill-Uffiċċju għall-IA. Ladarba standard armonizzat jiġi ppubblikat u vvalutat bħala xieraq biex ikopri l-obbligi rilevanti mill-Uffiċċju għall-IA, jenħtieġ li l-konformità ma' standard armonizzat Ewropew tagħti lill-fornituri l-preżunzjoni tal-konformità. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jkunu jistgħu juru l-konformità bl-użu ta' mezzi adegwati alternattivi, jekk il-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jew l-istandards armonizzati ma jkunux disponibbli, jew jagħżlu li ma jiddependux fuqhom.
(117)
The codes of practice should represent a central tool for the proper compliance with the obligations provided for under this Regulation for providers of general-purpose AI models. Providers should be able to rely on codes of practice to demonstrate compliance with the obligations. By means of implementing acts, the Commission may decide to approve a code of practice and give it a general validity within the Union, or, alternatively, to provide common rules for the implementation of the relevant obligations, if, by the time this Regulation becomes applicable, a code of practice cannot be finalised or is not deemed adequate by the AI Office. Once a harmonised standard is published and assessed as suitable to cover the relevant obligations by the AI Office, compliance with a European harmonised standard should grant providers the presumption of conformity. Providers of general-purpose AI models should furthermore be able to demonstrate compliance using alternative adequate means, if codes of practice or harmonised standards are not available, or they choose not to rely on those.
(118)
Dan ir-Regolament jirregola s-sistemi tal-IA u l-mudelli tal-IA billi jimponi ċerti rekwiżiti u obbligi għall-atturi rilevanti tas-suq li qed jintroduċuhom fis-suq, iqegħduhom fis-servizz jew fl-użu fl-Unjoni, u b'hekk jikkomplementa l-obbligi għall-fornituri tas-servizzi intermedjarji li jinkorporaw tali sistemi jew mudelli fis-servizzi tagħhom irregolati bir-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065. Sal-punt li tali sistemi jew mudelli jkunu inkorporati fi pjattaformi online kbar ħafna ddeżinjati jew f'magni tat-tiftix online kbar ħafna, dawn ikunu soġġetti għall-qafas ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju previst fir-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065. Konsegwentement, jenħtieġ li l-obbligi korrispondenti ta' dan ir-Regolament jiġu preżunti li ġew issodisfati, dment li ma jitfaċċawx riskji sistemiċi sinifikanti mhux koperti mir-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065 u jiġu identifikati f'tali mudelli. F'dan il-qafas, il-fornituri tal-pjattaformi online kbar ħafna u tal-magni tat-tiftix online kbar ħafna huma obbligati jivvalutaw ir-riskji sistemiċi potenzjali li jirriżultaw mid-disinn, il-funzjonament u l-użu tas-servizzi tagħhom, inkluż kif id-disinn tas-sistemi algoritmiċi użati fis-servizz jista' jikkontribwixxi għal tali riskji, kif ukoll riskji sistemiċi li jirriżultaw minn użi ħżiena potenzjali. Dawk il-fornituri huma obbligati wkoll li jieħdu miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni xierqa b'rispett għad-drittijiet fundamentali.
(118)
This Regulation regulates AI systems and AI models by imposing certain requirements and obligations for relevant market actors that are placing them on the market, putting into service or use in the Union, thereby complementing obligations for providers of intermediary services that embed such systems or models into their services regulated by Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. To the extent that such systems or models are embedded into designated very large online platforms or very large online search engines, they are subject to the risk-management framework provided for in Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. Consequently, the corresponding obligations of this Regulation should be presumed to be fulfilled, unless significant systemic risks not covered by Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 emerge and are identified in such models. Within this framework, providers of very large online platforms and very large online search engines are obliged to assess potential systemic risks stemming from the design, functioning and use of their services, including how the design of algorithmic systems used in the service may contribute to such risks, as well as systemic risks stemming from potential misuses. Those providers are also obliged to take appropriate mitigating measures in observance of fundamental rights.
(119)
Meta wieħed iqis il-pass mgħaġġel tal-innovazzjoni u l-evoluzzjoni teknoloġika tas-servizzi diġitali fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' strumenti differenti tad-dritt tal-Unjoni b'mod partikolari meta wieħed iżomm f'moħħu l-użu u l-perċezzjoni tar-riċevituri tagħhom, is-sistemi tal-IA soġġetti għal dan ir-Regolament jistgħu jiġu previsti bħala servizzi intermedjarji jew partijiet minnhom skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065, li jenħtieġ li jiġi interpretat b'mod teknoloġikament newtrali. Pereżempju, is-sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jintużaw biex jipprovdu magni tat-tiftix online, b'mod partikolari, sal-punt li sistema tal-IA bħal chatbot online twettaq tfittxijiet, fil-prinċipju, tas-siti web kollha, imbagħad tinkorpora r-riżultati fl-għarfien eżistenti tagħha u tuża l-għarfien aġġornat biex tiġġenera output uniku li jikkombina sorsi differenti ta' informazzjoni.
(119)
Considering the quick pace of innovation and the technological evolution of digital services in scope of different instruments of Union law in particular having in mind the usage and the perception of their recipients, the AI systems subject to this Regulation may be provided as intermediary services or parts thereof within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, which should be interpreted in a technology-neutral manner. For example, AI systems may be used to provide online search engines, in particular, to the extent that an AI system such as an online chatbot performs searches of, in principle, all websites, then incorporates the results into its existing knowledge and uses the updated knowledge to generate a single output that combines different sources of information.
(120)
Barra minn hekk, l-obbligi imposti fuq il-fornituri u l-implimentaturi ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA f'dan ir-Regolament biex jippermettu l-kxif u d-divulgazzjoni li l-outputs ta' dawk is-sistemi jiġu ġġenerati jew immanipulati b'mod artifiċjali huma partikolarment rilevanti biex tiġi ffaċilitata l-implimentazzjoni effettiva tar-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065. Dan japplika b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-obbligi tal-fornituri ta' pjattaformi online kbar ħafna jew ta' magni tat-tiftix online kbar ħafna biex jidentifikaw u jimmitigaw ir-riskji sistemiċi li jistgħu jirriżultaw mid-disseminazzjoni ta' kontenut li jkun ġie ġġenerat jew immanipulat b'mod artifiċjali, b'mod partikolari r-riskju tal-effetti negattivi reali jew prevedibbli fuq il-proċessi demokratiċi, id-diskors ċiviku u l-proċessi elettorali, inkluż permezz tad-diżinformazzjoni.
(120)
Furthermore, obligations placed on providers and deployers of certain AI systems in this Regulation to enable the detection and disclosure that the outputs of those systems are artificially generated or manipulated are particularly relevant to facilitate the effective implementation of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. This applies in particular as regards the obligations of providers of very large online platforms or very large online search engines to identify and mitigate systemic risks that may arise from the dissemination of content that has been artificially generated or manipulated, in particular risk of the actual or foreseeable negative effects on democratic processes, civic discourse and electoral processes, including through disinformation.
(121)
Jenħtieġ li l-istandardizzazzjoni taqdi rwol ewlieni biex tipprovdi soluzzjonijiet tekniċi lill-fornituri ħalli tkun żgurata l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, f'konformità mal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku, biex tippromwovi l-innovazzjoni kif ukoll il-kompetittività u t-tkabbir fis-suq uniku. Jenħtieġ li l-konformità mal-istandards armonizzati kif definiti fl-Artikolu 2, il-punt (1)(c) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (41), li normalment mistennija jirriflettu l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku, tkun mezz biex il-fornituri juru l-konformità mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament. Għalhekk jenħtieġ li titħeġġeġ rappreżentazzjoni bilanċjata tal-interessi li tinvolvi l-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti kollha fl-iżvilupp tal-istandards, b'mod partikolari l-SMEs, l-organizzazzjonijiet tal-konsumaturi u l-partijiet ikkonċernati fil-qasam tal-ambjent u dak soċjali f'konformità mal-Artikoli 5 u 6 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012. Sabiex tiġi ffaċilitata l-konformità, jenħtieġ li t-talbiet ta' standardizzazzjoni jinħarġu mill-Kummissjoni mingħajr dewmien żejjed. Meta tkun qed tħejji t-talba ta' standardizzazzjoni, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tikkonsulta lill-forum konsultattiv u lill-Bord sabiex tiġbor l-kompetenza esperta rilevanti. Madankollu, fin-nuqqas ta' referenzi rilevanti għal standards armonizzati, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tkun tista' tistabbilixxi, permezz ta' atti ta' implimentazzjoni, u wara konsultazzjoni mal-forum konsultattiv, speċifikazzjonijiet komuni għal ċerti rekwiżiti skont dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li l-ispeċifikazzjoni komuni tkun soluzzjoni ta' riżerva eċċezzjonali biex jiġi ffaċilitat l-obbligu tal-fornitur li jikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament, meta t-talba ta' standardizzazzjoni ma tkunx ġiet aċċettata minn xi waħda mill-organizzazzjonijiet Ewropej tal-istandardizzazzjoni, jew meta l-istandards armonizzati rilevanti ma jindirizzawx biżżejjed it-tħassib dwar id-drittijiet fundamentali, jew meta l-istandards armonizzati ma jikkonformawx mat-talba, jew meta jkun hemm dewmien fl-adozzjoni ta' standard armonizzat xieraq. Fejn tali dewmien fl-adozzjoni ta' standard armonizzat ikun dovut għall-kumplessità teknika ta' dak l-istandard, jenħtieġ li dan jiġi kkunsidrat mill-Kummissjoni qabel ma jiġi maħsub l-istabbiliment ta' speċifikazzjonijiet komuni. Meta tiżviluppa speċifikazzjonijiet komuni, il-Kummissjoni hija mħeġġa tikkoopera mas-sħab internazzjonali u mal-korpi internazzjonali tal-istandardizzazzjoni.
(121)
Standardisation should play a key role to provide technical solutions to providers to ensure compliance with this Regulation, in line with the state of the art, to promote innovation as well as competitiveness and growth in the single market. Compliance with harmonised standards as defined in Article 2, point (1)(c), of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (41), which are normally expected to reflect the state of the art, should be a means for providers to demonstrate conformity with the requirements of this Regulation. A balanced representation of interests involving all relevant stakeholders in the development of standards, in particular SMEs, consumer organisations and environmental and social stakeholders in accordance with Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 should therefore be encouraged. In order to facilitate compliance, the standardisation requests should be issued by the Commission without undue delay. When preparing the standardisation request, the Commission should consult the advisory forum and the Board in order to collect relevant expertise. However, in the absence of relevant references to harmonised standards, the Commission should be able to establish, via implementing acts, and after consultation of the advisory forum, common specifications for certain requirements under this Regulation. The common specification should be an exceptional fall back solution to facilitate the provider’s obligation to comply with the requirements of this Regulation, when the standardisation request has not been accepted by any of the European standardisation organisations, or when the relevant harmonised standards insufficiently address fundamental rights concerns, or when the harmonised standards do not comply with the request, or when there are delays in the adoption of an appropriate harmonised standard. Where such a delay in the adoption of a harmonised standard is due to the technical complexity of that standard, this should be considered by the Commission before contemplating the establishment of common specifications. When developing common specifications, the Commission is encouraged to cooperate with international partners and international standardisation bodies.
(122)
Jixraq li, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-użu ta' standards armonizzati u speċifikazzjonijiet komuni, ikun jenħtieġ li l-fornituri tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li tkun ġiet imħarrġa u ttestjata fuq data li tirrifletti l-issettjar ġeografiku, komportamentali, kuntestwali jew funzjonali speċifiku li fih tkun maħsuba li tintuża s-sistema tal-IA, jiġu preżunti li jikkonformaw mal-miżura rilevanti prevista fir-rekwiżit dwar il-governanza tad-data stipulata f'dan ir-Regolament. Mingħajr preġudizzju għar-rekwiżiti relatati mar-robustezza u l-akkuratezza stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 54(3) tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/881, jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkunu ġew iċċertifikati jew li għalihom tkun inħarġet dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità taħt skema taċ-ċibersigurtà skont dak ir-Regolament u li r-referenzi tagħhom ikunu ġew ippubblikati f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, jiġu preżunti li jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżit taċ-ċibersigurtà ta' dan ir-Regolament dment li ċ-ċertifikat taċ-ċibersigurtà jew id-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità jew partijiet minnha jkopru r-rekwiżit taċ-ċibersigurtà ta' dan ir-Regolament. Dan jibqa' mingħajr preġudizzju għan-natura volontarja ta' dik l-iskema ta' ċibersigurtà.
(122)
It is appropriate that, without prejudice to the use of harmonised standards and common specifications, providers of a high-risk AI system that has been trained and tested on data reflecting the specific geographical, behavioural, contextual or functional setting within which the AI system is intended to be used, should be presumed to comply with the relevant measure provided for under the requirement on data governance set out in this Regulation. Without prejudice to the requirements related to robustness and accuracy set out in this Regulation, in accordance with Article 54(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/881, high-risk AI systems that have been certified or for which a statement of conformity has been issued under a cybersecurity scheme pursuant to that Regulation and the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union should be presumed to comply with the cybersecurity requirement of this Regulation in so far as the cybersecurity certificate or statement of conformity or parts thereof cover the cybersecurity requirement of this Regulation. This remains without prejudice to the voluntary nature of that cybersecurity scheme.
(123)
Biex ikun żgurat livell għoli ta' affidabbiltà tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, jenħtieġ li dawk is-sistemi jkunu soġġetti għal valutazzjoni tal-konformità qabel ma jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz.
(123)
In order to ensure a high level of trustworthiness of high-risk AI systems, those systems should be subject to a conformity assessment prior to their placing on the market or putting into service.
(124)
Jixraq li, biex jitnaqqas kemm jista' jkun il-piż fuq l-operaturi u tkun evitata kwalunkwe duplikazzjoni possibbli, għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli relatati ma' prodotti koperti bil-leġiżlazzjoni eżistenti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bbażata fuq il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid, jenħtieġ li l-konformità ta' dawk is-sistemi tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament tiġi vvalutata bħala parti mill-valutazzjoni tal-konformità diġà prevista f'dik il-liġi. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li l-applikabbiltà tar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament ma taffettwax il-loġika, il-metodoloġija jew l-istruttura ġenerali speċifiċi ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità skont il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni.
(124)
It is appropriate that, in order to minimise the burden on operators and avoid any possible duplication, for high-risk AI systems related to products which are covered by existing Union harmonisation legislation based on the New Legislative Framework, the compliance of those AI systems with the requirements of this Regulation should be assessed as part of the conformity assessment already provided for in that law. The applicability of the requirements of this Regulation should thus not affect the specific logic, methodology or general structure of conformity assessment under the relevant Union harmonisation legislation.
(125)
Minħabba l-kumplessità tas-sistemi tal-IA b'risku għoli u r-riskji li huma assoċjati magħhom, huwa importanti li tiġi żviluppata proċedura adegwata ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità għal sistemi tal-IA b'risku għoli li jinvolvu korpi notifikati, l-hekk imsejħa valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn parti terza. Madankollu, minħabba l-esperjenza attwali ta' ċertifikaturi professjonali ta' qabel l-introduzzjoni fis-suq fil-qasam tas-sikurezza tal-prodotti u n-natura differenti tar-riskji involuti, jixraq li l-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn parti terza jiġi limitat, mill-inqas f'fażi inizjali tal-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għajr dawk relatati mal-prodotti. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li l-valutazzjoni tal-konformità ta' sistemi bħal dawn titwettaq bħala regola ġenerali mill-fornitur taħt ir-responsabbiltà tiegħu stess, bl-unika eċċezzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-bijometrija.
(125)
Given the complexity of high-risk AI systems and the risks that are associated with them, it is important to develop an adequate conformity assessment procedure for high-risk AI systems involving notified bodies, so-called third party conformity assessment. However, given the current experience of professional pre-market certifiers in the field of product safety and the different nature of risks involved, it is appropriate to limit, at least in an initial phase of application of this Regulation, the scope of application of third-party conformity assessment for high-risk AI systems other than those related to products. Therefore, the conformity assessment of such systems should be carried out as a general rule by the provider under its own responsibility, with the only exception of AI systems intended to be used for biometrics.
(126)
Biex issir valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn parti terza meta dan ikun meħtieġ, jenħtieġ li l-korpi notifikati jiġu nnotifikati skont dan ir-Regolament mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali, dment li dawn jikkonformaw ma' sett ta' rekwiżiti, b'mod partikolari dwar l-indipendenza, il-kompetenza u n-nuqqas ta' kunflitti ta' interess u rekwiżiti ta' ċibersigurtà adegwati. Jenħtieġ li n-notifika ta' dawk il-korpi tintbagħat mill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra permezz tal-għodda elettronika ta' notifika żviluppata u ġestita mill-Kummissjoni skont l-Artikolu R23 tal-Anness I tad-Deċiżjoni Nru 768/2008/KE.
(126)
In order to carry out third-party conformity assessments when so required, notified bodies should be notified under this Regulation by the national competent authorities, provided that they comply with a set of requirements, in particular on independence, competence, absence of conflicts of interests and suitable cybersecurity requirements. Notification of those bodies should be sent by national competent authorities to the Commission and the other Member States by means of the electronic notification tool developed and managed by the Commission pursuant to Article R23 of Annex I to Decision No 768/2008/EC.
(127)
F'konformità mal-impenji tal-Unjoni skont il-Ftehim tal-Organizzazzjoni Dinjija tal-Kummerċ dwar l-Ostakli Tekniċi għall-Kummerċ, huwa xieraq li jiġi ffaċilitat ir-rikonoxximent reċiproku tar-riżultati tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità prodotti minn korpi kompetenti tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità, indipendenti mit-territorju li fih ikunu stabbiliti, dment li dawk il-korpi ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità stabbiliti skont il-liġi ta' pajjiż terz jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti applikabbli ta' dan ir-Regolament u l-Unjoni tkun ikkonkludiet ftehim skont dan. F'dan il-kuntest, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tesplora b'mod attiv strumenti internazzjonali possibbli għal dak l-għan u b'mod partikolari tfittex il-konklużjoni ta' ftehimiet ta' rikonoxximent reċiproku ma' pajjiżi terzi.
(127)
In line with Union commitments under the World Trade Organization Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, it is adequate to facilitate the mutual recognition of conformity assessment results produced by competent conformity assessment bodies, independent of the territory in which they are established, provided that those conformity assessment bodies established under the law of a third country meet the applicable requirements of this Regulation and the Union has concluded an agreement to that extent. In this context, the Commission should actively explore possible international instruments for that purpose and in particular pursue the conclusion of mutual recognition agreements with third countries.
(128)
F'konformità mal-kunċett stabbilit b'mod komuni ta' modifika sostanzjali għall-prodotti regolati mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni, huwa xieraq li kull meta sseħħ bidla li tista' taffettwa l-konformità ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli ma' dan ir-Regolament (eż. bidla fis-sistema operattiva jew fl-arkitettura tas-software), jew meta jinbidel l-għan maħsub tas-sistema, jenħtieġ li dik is-sistema tal-IA titqies bħala sistema ġdida tal-IA li jenħtieġ li ssirilha valutazzjoni tal-konformità ġdida. Madankollu, il-bidliet li jseħħu fl-algoritmu u l-prestazzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA li jkomplu “jitgħallmu” wara li jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew jitqiegħdu fis-servizz, jiġifieri l-adattament awtomatiku ta' kif jitwettqu l-funzjonijiet, jenħtieġ li ma jikkostitwixxux modifika sostanzjali, dment li dawk il-bidliet ikunu ġew iddeterminati minn qabel mill-fornitur u vvalutati fil-mument tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità.
(128)
In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification for products regulated by Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate that whenever a change occurs which may affect the compliance of a high-risk AI system with this Regulation (e.g. change of operating system or software architecture), or when the intended purpose of the system changes, that AI system should be considered to be a new AI system which should undergo a new conformity assessment. However, changes occurring to the algorithm and the performance of AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service, namely automatically adapting how functions are carried out, should not constitute a substantial modification, provided that those changes have been pre-determined by the provider and assessed at the moment of the conformity assessment.
(129)
Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jkollhom il-markatura CE biex jindikaw il-konformità tagħhom ma' dan ir-Regolament b'tali mod li jkunu jistgħu jiċċaqilqu liberament fis-suq intern. Għal sistemi tal-IA b'risku għoli inkorporati fi prodott, jenħtieġ li titwaħħal markatura CE fiżika, u tista' tiġi kkomplementata minn markatura CE diġitali. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'risku għoli pprovduti biss b'mod diġitali, jenħtieġ li tintuża markatura CE diġitali. Jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri ma joħolqux xkiel mhux ġustifikat għall-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew għat-tqegħid fis-servizz ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament u jkollhom il-markatura CE.
(129)
High-risk AI systems should bear the CE marking to indicate their conformity with this Regulation so that they can move freely within the internal market. For high-risk AI systems embedded in a product, a physical CE marking should be affixed, and may be complemented by a digital CE marking. For high-risk AI systems only provided digitally, a digital CE marking should be used. Member States should not create unjustified obstacles to the placing on the market or the putting into service of high-risk AI systems that comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and bear the CE marking.
(130)
F'ċerti kundizzjonijiet, id-disponibbiltà rapida ta' teknoloġiji innovattivi tista' tkun kruċjali għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni, il-protezzjoni tal-ambjent u t-tibdil fil-klima u għas-soċjetà kollha kemm hi. Għalhekk jixraq li, għal raġunijiet eċċezzjonali ta' sigurtà pubblika jew ta' protezzjoni tal-ħajja u tas-saħħa tal-persuni fiżiċi, il-ħarsien tal-ambjent u l-protezzjoni ta' assi prinċipali industrijali u tal-infrastruttura, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jkunu jistgħu jawtorizzaw l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz ta' sistemi tal-IA li ma tkunx saritilhom valutazzjoni tal-konformità. F'sitwazzjonijiet debitament ġustifikati kif previst f’ dan ir-Regolament, l-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew l-awtoritajiet tal-protezzjoni ċivili jistgħu jqiegħdu fis-servizz sistema speċifika tal-IA b'risku għoli mingħajr l-awtorizzazzjoni tal-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, dment li tali awtorizzazzjoni tintalab matul jew wara l-użu mingħajr dewmien żejjed.
(130)
Under certain conditions, rapid availability of innovative technologies may be crucial for health and safety of persons, the protection of the environment and climate change and for society as a whole. It is thus appropriate that under exceptional reasons of public security or protection of life and health of natural persons, environmental protection and the protection of key industrial and infrastructural assets, market surveillance authorities could authorise the placing on the market or the putting into service of AI systems which have not undergone a conformity assessment. In duly justified situations, as provided for in this Regulation, law enforcement authorities or civil protection authorities may put a specific high-risk AI system into service without the authorisation of the market surveillance authority, provided that such authorisation is requested during or after the use without undue delay.
(131)
Sabiex tiġi ffaċilitata l-ħidma tal-Kummissjoni u tal-Istati Membri fil-qasam tal-IA u biex tiżdied it-trasparenza lejn il-pubbliku, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għajr dawk relatati ma' prodotti li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-leġiżlazzjoni eżistenti rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni, kif ukoll fornituri li jqisu li sistema tal-IA elenkata fil-każijiet ta’ użu b'riskju għoli f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament mhix ta' riskju għoli abbażi ta' deroga, ikunu mitluba jirreġistraw lilhom infushom u l-informazzjoni dwar is-sistema tal-IA tagħhom f'bażi tad-data tal-UE, li trid tiġi stabbilita u ġestita mill-Kummissjoni. Qabel ma jużaw sistema tal-IA elenkata fil-każijiet ta’ użu b'riskju għoli f’anness ta’ dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkunu awtoritajiet, aġenziji jew korpi pubbliċi, jirreġistraw lilhom infushom f'tali bażi tad-data tal-UE u jagħżlu s-sistema li beħsiebhom jużaw. Jenħtieġ li implimentaturi oħra jkunu intitolati li jagħmlu dan b'mod volontarju. Jenħtieġ li din it-taqsima tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE tkun aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku, mingħajr ħlas, u jenħtieġ li l-informazzjoni tkun faċilment navigabbli, tinftiehem u tinqara mill-magni. Jenħtieġ li l-bażi tad-data tkun faċli għall-utent ukoll, pereżempju billi tipprovdi funzjonalitajiet ta' tiftix, inkluż permezz ta' keywords, li jippermettu lill-pubbliku ġenerali jsib informazzjoni rilevanti li trid tiġi ppreżentata mar-reġistrazzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u dwar il-każ ta’ użu tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, stipulati f’anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, li għalihom jikkorrispondu s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe modifika sostanzjali tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tiġi rreġistrata wkoll fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE. Għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli fil-qasam tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-migrazzjoni, tal-ażil u tal-ġestjoni tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, jenħtieġ li l-obbligi ta' reġistrazzjoni jiġu ssodisfati f'taqsima sigura mhux pubblika tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE. Jenħtieġ li l-aċċess għat-taqsima sigura mhux pubblika jkun strettament limitat għall-Kummissjoni kif ukoll għall-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fir-rigward tat-taqsima nazzjonali tagħhom ta’ dik il-bażi tad-data. Jenħtieġ li s-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli fil-qasam tal-infrastruttura kritika jiġu rreġistrati biss fil-livell nazzjonali. Jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tkun il-kontrollur tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE, f’konformità mar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725. Sabiex tiġi żgurata l-funzjonalità sħiħa tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE, meta tiġi implimentata, jenħtieġ li l-proċedura għall-istabbiliment tal-bażi tad-data tinkludi l-iżvilupp ta' speċifikazzjonijiet funzjonali mill-Kummissjoni u rapport tal-awditjar indipendenti. Jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tqis ir-riskji taċ-ċibersigurtà meta twettaq il-kompiti tagħha bħala kontrollur tad-data fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE. Sabiex jiġu mmassimizzati d-disponibbiltà u l-użu tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE mill-pubbliku, il-bażi tad-data tal-UE, inkluż l-informazzjoni disponibbli permezz tagħha, jenħtieġ li tikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti skont id-Direttiva (UE) 2019/882.
(131)
In order to facilitate the work of the Commission and the Member States in the AI field as well as to increase the transparency towards the public, providers of high-risk AI systems other than those related to products falling within the scope of relevant existing Union harmonisation legislation, as well as providers who consider that an AI system listed in the high-risk use cases in an annex to this Regulation is not high-risk on the basis of a derogation, should be required to register themselves and information about their AI system in an EU database, to be established and managed by the Commission. Before using an AI system listed in the high-risk use cases in an annex to this Regulation, deployers of high-risk AI systems that are public authorities, agencies or bodies, should register themselves in such database and select the system that they envisage to use. Other deployers should be entitled to do so voluntarily. This section of the EU database should be publicly accessible, free of charge, the information should be easily navigable, understandable and machine-readable. The EU database should also be user-friendly, for example by providing search functionalities, including through keywords, allowing the general public to find relevant information to be submitted upon the registration of high-risk AI systems and on the use case of high-risk AI systems, set out in an annex to this Regulation, to which the high-risk AI systems correspond. Any substantial modification of high-risk AI systems should also be registered in the EU database. For high-risk AI systems in the area of law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control management, the registration obligations should be fulfilled in a secure non-public section of the EU database. Access to the secure non-public section should be strictly limited to the Commission as well as to market surveillance authorities with regard to their national section of that database. High-risk AI systems in the area of critical infrastructure should only be registered at national level. The Commission should be the controller of the EU database, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. In order to ensure the full functionality of the EU database, when deployed, the procedure for setting the database should include the development of functional specifications by the Commission and an independent audit report. The Commission should take into account cybersecurity risks when carrying out its tasks as data controller on the EU database. In order to maximise the availability and use of the EU database by the public, the EU database, including the information made available through it, should comply with requirements under the Directive (EU) 2019/882.
(132)
Ċerti sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jinteraġixxu ma' persuni fiżiċi jew biex jiġġeneraw kontenut jistgħu joħolqu riskji speċifiċi ta' personifikazzjoni jew qerq irrispettivament minn jekk dawn jikkwalifikawx li għandhom riskju għoli jew le. Għalhekk, f'ċerti ċirkostanzi, jenħtieġ li l-użu ta' dawn is-sistemi jkun soġġett għal obbligi speċifiċi tat-trasparenza mingħajr preġudizzju għar-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u soġġett għal eċċezzjonijiet immirati biex jittieħed kont tal-ħtieġa speċjali tal-infurzar tal-liġi. B'mod partikolari, jenħtieġ li l-persuni fiżiċi jiġu nnotifikati li qed jinteraġixxu ma' sistema tal-IA, sakemm dan ma jkunx ovvju mill-perspettiva ta' persuna fiżika li tkun raġonevolment infurmata tajjeb, osservanti u prudenti, filwaqt li jitqiesu ċ-ċirkostanzi u l-kuntest tal-użu. Meta jiġi implimentat dak l-obbligu, jenħtieġ li jitqiesu l-karatteristiċi tal-persuni fiżiċi li jagħmlu parti minn gruppi vulnerabbli minħabba l-età jew id-diżabbiltà tagħhom sal-punt li s-sistema tal-IA tkun maħsuba biex tinteraġixxi ma' dawk il-gruppi wkoll. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-persuni fiżiċi jiġu nnotifikati meta jkunu esposti għal sistemi tal-IA li, bl-ipproċessar tad-data bijometrika tagħhom, jistgħu jidentifikaw jew jinferixxu l-emozzjonijiet jew l-intenzjonijiet ta' dawk il-persuni jew jassenjawhom għal kategoriji speċifiċi. Tali kategoriji speċifiċi jistgħu jkunu relatati ma' aspetti bħas-sess, l-età, il-kulur tax-xagħar, il-kulur tal-għajnejn, tatwaġġi, karatteristiċi personali, l-oriġini etnika, il-preferenzi u l-interessi personali. Jenħtieġ li din l-informazzjoni u n-notifiki jiġu pprovduti b'formati aċċessibbli għall-persuni b'diżabbiltà.
(132)
Certain AI systems intended to interact with natural persons or to generate content may pose specific risks of impersonation or deception irrespective of whether they qualify as high-risk or not. In certain circumstances, the use of these systems should therefore be subject to specific transparency obligations without prejudice to the requirements and obligations for high-risk AI systems and subject to targeted exceptions to take into account the special need of law enforcement. In particular, natural persons should be notified that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the point of view of a natural person who is reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect taking into account the circumstances and the context of use. When implementing that obligation, the characteristics of natural persons belonging to vulnerable groups due to their age or disability should be taken into account to the extent the AI system is intended to interact with those groups as well. Moreover, natural persons should be notified when they are exposed to AI systems that, by processing their biometric data, can identify or infer the emotions or intentions of those persons or assign them to specific categories. Such specific categories can relate to aspects such as sex, age, hair colour, eye colour, tattoos, personal traits, ethnic origin, personal preferences and interests. Such information and notifications should be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities.
(133)
Diversi sistemi tal-IA jistgħu jiġġeneraw kwantitajiet kbar ta' kontenut sintetiku li jsir dejjem aktar diffiċli għall-bnedmin biex jiddistingwu minn kontenut iġġenerat mill-bniedem u kontenut awtentiku. Id-disponibbiltà wiesgħa u l-kapaċitajiet dejjem akbar ta' dawk is-sistemi għandhom impatt sinifikanti fuq l-integrità u l-fiduċja fl-ekosistema tal-informazzjoni, filwaqt li jżidu riskji ġodda ta' miżinformazzjoni u manipulazzjoni fuq skala kbira, frodi, personifikazzjoni u qerq tal-konsumatur. Fid-dawl ta' dawk l-impatti, il-pass teknoloġiku mgħaġġel u l-ħtieġa ta' metodi u tekniki ġodda biex tiġi traċċata l-oriġini tal-informazzjoni, jixraq li l-fornituri ta' dawk is-sistemi jinkorporaw soluzzjonijiet tekniċi li jippermettu l-immarkar f'format li jinqara mill-magni u l-kxif li l-output ikun ġie ġġenerat jew immanipulat minn sistema tal-IA u mhux minn bniedem. Jenħtieġ li tali tekniki u metodi jkunu affidabbli, interoperabbli, effettivi u robusti biżżejjed sa fejn dan ikun teknikament fattibbli, filwaqt li jitqiesu t-tekniki disponibbli jew taħlita ta' tali tekniki, bħal marki tal-ilma, identifikazzjonijiet tal-metadata, metodi kriptografiċi biex jiġu ppruvati l-provenjenza u l-awtentiċità tal-kontenut, il-metodi ta' reġistrazzjoni, il-marki tas-swaba' jew tekniki oħra, skont kif ikun xieraq. Meta jimplimentaw dan l-obbligu, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri jqisu wkoll l-ispeċifiċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet tat-tipi differenti ta' kontenut u l-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi u tas-suq rilevanti f'dan il-qasam, kif rifless fl-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku rikonoxxut b'mod ġenerali. Tali tekniki u metodi jistgħu jiġu implimentati fil-livell tas-sistema tal-IA jew fil-livell tal-mudell tal-IA, inkluż mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jiġġeneraw kontenut, u b'hekk jiġi ffaċilitat it-twettiq ta' dan l-obbligu mill-fornitur downstream tas-sistema tal-IA. Biex jibqa' proporzjonat, huwa xieraq li jiġi previst li dan l-obbligu tal-immarkar jenħtieġ li ma jkoprix sistemi tal-IA li primarjament iwettqu funzjoni ta' assistenza għall-editjar standard jew għas-sistemi tal-IA li ma jbiddlux b'mod sostanzjali d-data tal-input ipprovduta mill-implimentatur jew is-semantika tagħha.
(133)
A variety of AI systems can generate large quantities of synthetic content that becomes increasingly hard for humans to distinguish from human-generated and authentic content. The wide availability and increasing capabilities of those systems have a significant impact on the integrity and trust in the information ecosystem, raising new risks of misinformation and manipulation at scale, fraud, impersonation and consumer deception. In light of those impacts, the fast technological pace and the need for new methods and techniques to trace origin of information, it is appropriate to require providers of those systems to embed technical solutions that enable marking in a machine readable format and detection that the output has been generated or manipulated by an AI system and not a human. Such techniques and methods should be sufficiently reliable, interoperable, effective and robust as far as this is technically feasible, taking into account available techniques or a combination of such techniques, such as watermarks, metadata identifications, cryptographic methods for proving provenance and authenticity of content, logging methods, fingerprints or other techniques, as may be appropriate. When implementing this obligation, providers should also take into account the specificities and the limitations of the different types of content and the relevant technological and market developments in the field, as reflected in the generally acknowledged state of the art. Such techniques and methods can be implemented at the level of the AI system or at the level of the AI model, including general-purpose AI models generating content, thereby facilitating fulfilment of this obligation by the downstream provider of the AI system. To remain proportionate, it is appropriate to envisage that this marking obligation should not cover AI systems performing primarily an assistive function for standard editing or AI systems not substantially altering the input data provided by the deployer or the semantics thereof.
(134)
Minbarra s-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi użati mill-fornituri tas-sistema tal-IA, l-implimentaturi li jużaw sistema tal-IA biex jiġġeneraw jew jimmanipulaw kontenut ta' immaġni, awdjo jew vidjo li jixbah b'mod sinifikattiv lil persuni, oġġetti, postijiet, entitajiet jew avvenimenti eżistenti u li jidher b'mod falz li persuna tkun awtentika jew veritiera (deep fakes), jenħtieġ li jiddivulgaw ukoll b'mod ċar u distint li l-kontenut inħoloq jew ġie mmanipulat b'mod artifiċjali billi jittikkettaw l-output tal-intelliġenza artifiċjali kif xieraq u jiddivulgaw l-oriġini artifiċjali tiegħu. Jenħtieġ li l-konformità ma' dan l-obbligu ta' trasparenza ma tiġix interpretata bħala li tindika li l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA jew tal-output tagħha jimpedixxi d-dritt għal-libertà tal-espressjoni u d-dritt għal-libertà tal-arti u x-xjenzi ggarantiti fil-Karta, b'mod partikolari fejn il-kontenut ikun parti minn ħidma jew programm evidentement kreattiv, satiriku, artistiku, fittizju jew analoġu, soġġett għal salvagwardji xierqa għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet ta' partijiet terzi. F'dawk il-każijiet, l-obbligu ta' trasparenza għal deep fakes stipulat f'dan ir-Regolament huwa limitat għad-divulgazzjoni tal-eżistenza ta' tali kontenut iġġenerat jew manipulat b'mod xieraq li ma jfixkilx il-wiri jew it-tgawdija tax-xogħol, inkluż l-isfruttament u l-użu normali tiegħu, filwaqt li jinżammu l-utilità u l-kwalità tax-xogħol. Barra minn hekk, huwa xieraq ukoll li jiġi previst obbligu ta' divulgazzjoni simili fir-rigward ta' test iġġenerat mill-IA jew manipulat sal-punt li jiġi ppubblikat bl-għan li l-pubbliku jiġi infurmat dwar kwistjonijiet ta' interess pubbliku sakemm il-kontenut iġġenerat mill-IA ma jkunx għadda minn proċess ta' rieżami mill-bniedem jew kontroll editorjali u persuna fiżika jew ġuridika jkollha r-responsabbiltà editorjali għall-pubblikazzjoni tal-kontenut.
(134)
Further to the technical solutions employed by the providers of the AI system, deployers who use an AI system to generate or manipulate image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, objects, places, entities or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic or truthful (deep fakes), should also clearly and distinguishably disclose that the content has been artificially created or manipulated by labelling the AI output accordingly and disclosing its artificial origin. Compliance with this transparency obligation should not be interpreted as indicating that the use of the AI system or its output impedes the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of the arts and sciences guaranteed in the Charter, in particular where the content is part of an evidently creative, satirical, artistic, fictional or analogous work or programme, subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of third parties. In those cases, the transparency obligation for deep fakes set out in this Regulation is limited to disclosure of the existence of such generated or manipulated content in an appropriate manner that does not hamper the display or enjoyment of the work, including its normal exploitation and use, while maintaining the utility and quality of the work. In addition, it is also appropriate to envisage a similar disclosure obligation in relation to AI-generated or manipulated text to the extent it is published with the purpose of informing the public on matters of public interest unless the AI-generated content has undergone a process of human review or editorial control and a natural or legal person holds editorial responsibility for the publication of the content.
(135)
Mingħajr preġudizzju għan-natura obbligatorja u l-applikabbiltà sħiħa tal-obbligi ta' trasparenza, il-Kummissjoni tista' tħeġġeġ u tiffaċilita wkoll it-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet ta' prattika fil-livell tal-Unjoni biex tiffaċilita l-implimentazzjoni effettiva tal-obbligi rigward il-kxif u t-tikkettar ta' kontenut iġġenerat jew immanipulat b'mod artifiċjali, inkluż biex tappoġġa arranġamenti prattiċi biex, kif xieraq, il-mekkaniżmi ta' kxif isiru aċċessibbli u tiġi ffaċilitata l-kooperazzjoni ma' atturi oħra tul il-katina tal-valur, id-disseminazzjoni tal-kontenut jew il-verifika tal-awtentiċità u l-provenjenza tiegħu biex il-pubbliku jkun jista' jiddistingwi b'mod effettiv il-kontenut iġġenerat mill-IA.
(135)
Without prejudice to the mandatory nature and full applicability of the transparency obligations, the Commission may also encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of practice at Union level to facilitate the effective implementation of the obligations regarding the detection and labelling of artificially generated or manipulated content, including to support practical arrangements for making, as appropriate, the detection mechanisms accessible and facilitating cooperation with other actors along the value chain, disseminating content or checking its authenticity and provenance to enable the public to effectively distinguish AI-generated content.
(136)
L-obbligi imposti fuq il-fornituri u l-implimentaturi ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA f'dan ir-Regolament biex jippermettu l-kxif u d-divulgazzjoni li l-outputs ta' dawk is-sistemi jiġu ġġenerati jew immanipulati b'mod artifiċjali huma partikolarment rilevanti biex tiġi ffaċilitata l-implimentazzjoni effettiva tar-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065. Dan japplika b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-obbligi tal-fornituri ta' pjattaformi online kbar ħafna jew ta' magni tat-tiftix online kbar ħafna biex jidentifikaw u jimmitigaw ir-riskji sistemiċi li jistgħu jirriżultaw mid-disseminazzjoni ta' kontenut li jkun ġie ġġenerat jew immanipulat b'mod artifiċjali, b'mod partikolari r-riskju tal-effetti negattivi reali jew prevedibbli fuq il-proċessi demokratiċi, id-diskors ċiviku u l-proċessi elettorali, inkluż permezz tad-diżinformazzjoni. Ir-rekwiżit li jiġi ttikkettat il-kontenut iġġenerat mis-sistemi tal-IA skont dan ir-Regolament huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għall-obbligu fl-Artikolu 16(6) tar-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065 għall-fornituri ta' servizzi ta' hosting li joħorġu avviżi dwar kontenut illegali riċevut skont l-Artikolu 16(1) ta' dak ir-Regolament u jenħtieġ li ma jinfluwenzax il-valutazzjoni u d-deċiżjoni dwar l-illegalità tal-kontenut speċifiku. Jenħtieġ li din l-evalwazzjoni ssir biss b'riferiment għar-regoli li jirregolaw il-legalità tal-kontenut.
(136)
The obligations placed on providers and deployers of certain AI systems in this Regulation to enable the detection and disclosure that the outputs of those systems are artificially generated or manipulated are particularly relevant to facilitate the effective implementation of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. This applies in particular as regards the obligations of providers of very large online platforms or very large online search engines to identify and mitigate systemic risks that may arise from the dissemination of content that has been artificially generated or manipulated, in particular the risk of the actual or foreseeable negative effects on democratic processes, civic discourse and electoral processes, including through disinformation. The requirement to label content generated by AI systems under this Regulation is without prejudice to the obligation in Article 16(6) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 for providers of hosting services to process notices on illegal content received pursuant to Article 16(1) of that Regulation and should not influence the assessment and the decision on the illegality of the specific content. That assessment should be performed solely with reference to the rules governing the legality of the content.
(137)
Jenħtieġ li l-konformità mal-obbligi tat-trasparenza għas-sistemi tal-IA koperti minn dan ir-Regolament ma tiġix interpretata li tindika li l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA jew tal-output tagħha huwa legali skont dan ir-Regolament jew dritt ieħor tal-Unjoni u tal-Istati Membri u jenħtieġ li tkun mingħajr preġudizzju għal obbligi oħra ta' trasparenza għall-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA stabbiliti fil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali.
(137)
Compliance with the transparency obligations for the AI systems covered by this Regulation should not be interpreted as indicating that the use of the AI system or its output is lawful under this Regulation or other Union and Member State law and should be without prejudice to other transparency obligations for deployers of AI systems laid down in Union or national law.
(138)
L-IA hija familja ta' teknoloġiji li qed tiżviluppa b'mod rapidu li tirrikjedi sorveljanza regolatorja u spazju sikur u kkontrollat għall-esperimentazzjoni, filwaqt li tiżgura innovazzjoni u integrazzjoni responsabbli ta' salvagwardji u miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni tar-riskju xierqa. Sabiex jiġi żgurat qafas legali li jippromwovi l-innovazzjoni, jibqa' validu fil-futur u jkun reżiljenti għat-tfixkil, jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jiżguraw li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali tagħhom jistabbilixxu mill-inqas ambjent wieħed ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA fil-livell nazzjonali biex jiffaċilitaw l-iżvilupp u l-ittestjar ta' sistemi innovattivi tal-IA taħt sorveljanza regolatorja stretta qabel ma dawn is-sistemi jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew inkella jitqiegħdu fis-servizz. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jissodisfaw ukoll dan l-obbligu billi jipparteċipaw f'ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorji diġà eżistenti jew jistabbilixxu b'mod konġunt ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni ma' awtorità kompetenti waħda jew aktar tal-Istati Membri, dment li din il-parteċipazzjoni tipprovdi livell ekwivalenti ta' kopertura nazzjonali għall-Istati Membri parteċipanti. Ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jistgħu jiġu stabbiliti f'forma fiżika, diġitali jew ibrida u jistgħu jakkomodaw prodotti fiżiċi kif ukoll diġitali. Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet kostitwenti jiżguraw ukoll li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jkollhom ir-riżorsi adegwati għall-funzjonament tagħhom, inkluż ir-riżorsi finanzjarji u umani.
(138)
AI is a rapidly developing family of technologies that requires regulatory oversight and a safe and controlled space for experimentation, while ensuring responsible innovation and integration of appropriate safeguards and risk mitigation measures. To ensure a legal framework that promotes innovation, is future-proof and resilient to disruption, Member States should ensure that their national competent authorities establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox at national level to facilitate the development and testing of innovative AI systems under strict regulatory oversight before these systems are placed on the market or otherwise put into service. Member States could also fulfil this obligation through participating in already existing regulatory sandboxes or establishing jointly a sandbox with one or more Member States’ competent authorities, insofar as this participation provides equivalent level of national coverage for the participating Member States. AI regulatory sandboxes could be established in physical, digital or hybrid form and may accommodate physical as well as digital products. Establishing authorities should also ensure that the AI regulatory sandboxes have the adequate resources for their functioning, including financial and human resources.
(139)
Jenħtieġ li l-objettivi tal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jkunu li jrawmu l-innovazzjoni tal-IA billi jistabbilixxu ambjent ikkontrollat ta' esperimentazzjoni u ttestjar fil-fażi tal-iżvilupp u ta' qabel il-kummerċjalizzazzjoni biex jiżguraw il-konformità tas-sistemi innovattivi tal-IA ma' dan ir-Regolament u ma' liġijiet tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali oħra rilevanti. Barra minn hekk, l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jenħtieġ li jimmiraw li jsaħħu ċ-ċertezza legali għall-innovaturi u s-sorveljanza u l-fehim mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti tal-opportunitajiet, tar-riskji emerġenti u tal-impatti tal-użu tal-IA, biex jiġi ffaċilitat it-tagħlim regolatorju għall-awtoritajiet u għall-intrapriżi, inkluż bil-ħsieb ta' adattamenti futuri tal-qafas legali, biex jiġu appoġġati l-kooperazzjoni u l-kondiviżjoni tal-aħjar prattiki mal-awtoritajiet involuti fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, u biex jitħaffef l-aċċess għas-swieq, inkluż billi jitneħħew l-ostakli għall-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda. Jenħtieġ li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jkunu disponibbli b'mod wiesa' madwar l-Unjoni, u jenħtieġ li tingħata attenzjoni partikolari lill-aċċessibbiltà tagħhom għall-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda. Jenħtieġ li l-parteċipazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA tiffoka fuq kwistjonijiet li jqajmu inċertezza legali għall-fornituri u l-fornituri prospettivi biex jinnovaw, jesperimentaw bl-IA fl-Unjoni u jikkontribwixxu għal tagħlim regolatorju bbażat fuq l-evidenza. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li s-superviżjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA tkopri l-iżvilupp, it-taħriġ, l-ittestjar u l-validazzjoni tagħhom qabel ma s-sistemi jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz, kif ukoll il-kunċett u l-okkorrenza ta' modifika sostanzjali li tista' tirrikjedi proċedura ġdida ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità. Kwalunkwe riskju sinifikanti identifikat matul l-iżvilupp u l-ittestjar ta' tali sistemi tal-IA jenħtieġ li jirriżulta f'mitigazzjoni adegwata u, fin-nuqqas ta' din, fis-sospensjoni tal-proċess tal-iżvilupp u tal-ittestjar. Fejn xieraq, jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti li jkunu qed jistabbilixxu ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jikkooperaw ma' awtoritajiet rilevanti oħra, inkluż dawk li jissorveljaw il-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet fundamentali, u jistgħu jagħtu lok għall-involviment ta' atturi oħra fl-ekosistema tal-IA bħal organizzazzjonijiet nazzjonali jew Ewropej tal-istandardizzazzjoni, korpi notifikati, faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u tal-esperimentazzjoni, laboratorji tar-riċerka u tal-esperimentazzjoni, Ċentri Ewropej tal-Innovazzjoni Diġitali u organizzazzjonijiet rilevanti tal-partijiet ikkonċernati u tas-soċjetà ċivili. Biex ikunu żgurati implimentazzjoni uniformi madwar l-Unjoni u l-ekonomiji ta' skala, jixraq jiġu stabbiliti regoli komuni għall-implimentazzjoni tal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u qafas għall-kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtoritajiet rilevanti involuti fis-superviżjoni tal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA stabbiliti skont dan ir-Regolament ikunu mingħajr preġudizzju għal liġijiet oħra li jippermettu l-istabbiliment ta' ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni oħra bil-għan li jiżguraw il-konformità ma' liġijiet għajr dan ir-Regolament. Meta xieraq, jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti rilevanti inkarigati minn dawk l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja l-oħra jikkunsidraw il-benefiċċji tal-użu ta' dawk l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni anki għall-fini li jiżguraw il-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA ma' dan ir-Regolament. Bi qbil bejn l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti u l-parteċipanti fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali jista' jsir u jiġi ssorveljat ukoll fil-qafas tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA.
(139)
The objectives of the AI regulatory sandboxes should be to foster AI innovation by establishing a controlled experimentation and testing environment in the development and pre-marketing phase with a view to ensuring compliance of the innovative AI systems with this Regulation and other relevant Union and national law. Moreover, the AI regulatory sandboxes should aim to enhance legal certainty for innovators and the competent authorities’ oversight and understanding of the opportunities, emerging risks and the impacts of AI use, to facilitate regulatory learning for authorities and undertakings, including with a view to future adaptions of the legal framework, to support cooperation and the sharing of best practices with the authorities involved in the AI regulatory sandbox, and to accelerate access to markets, including by removing barriers for SMEs, including start-ups. AI regulatory sandboxes should be widely available throughout the Union, and particular attention should be given to their accessibility for SMEs, including start-ups. The participation in the AI regulatory sandbox should focus on issues that raise legal uncertainty for providers and prospective providers to innovate, experiment with AI in the Union and contribute to evidence-based regulatory learning. The supervision of the AI systems in the AI regulatory sandbox should therefore cover their development, training, testing and validation before the systems are placed on the market or put into service, as well as the notion and occurrence of substantial modification that may require a new conformity assessment procedure. Any significant risks identified during the development and testing of such AI systems should result in adequate mitigation and, failing that, in the suspension of the development and testing process. Where appropriate, national competent authorities establishing AI regulatory sandboxes should cooperate with other relevant authorities, including those supervising the protection of fundamental rights, and could allow for the involvement of other actors within the AI ecosystem such as national or European standardisation organisations, notified bodies, testing and experimentation facilities, research and experimentation labs, European Digital Innovation Hubs and relevant stakeholder and civil society organisations. To ensure uniform implementation across the Union and economies of scale, it is appropriate to establish common rules for the AI regulatory sandboxes’ implementation and a framework for cooperation between the relevant authorities involved in the supervision of the sandboxes. AI regulatory sandboxes established under this Regulation should be without prejudice to other law allowing for the establishment of other sandboxes aiming to ensure compliance with law other than this Regulation. Where appropriate, relevant competent authorities in charge of those other regulatory sandboxes should consider the benefits of using those sandboxes also for the purpose of ensuring compliance of AI systems with this Regulation. Upon agreement between the national competent authorities and the participants in the AI regulatory sandbox, testing in real world conditions may also be operated and supervised in the framework of the AI regulatory sandbox.
(140)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament jipprovdi l-bażi legali għall-fornituri u l-fornituri prospettivi fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA biex jużaw id-data personali miġbura għal finijiet oħra għall-iżvilupp ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA fl-interess pubbliku fi ħdan l-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, f'kundizzjonijiet speċifiċi biss, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 6(4) u l-Artikolu 9(2), il-punt (g) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, u mal-Artikoli 5, 6 u 10 tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725, u mingħajr preġudizzju għall-Artikolu 4(2) u l-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. L-obbligi l-oħra kollha tal-kontrolluri tad-data u d-drittijiet tas-suġġetti tad-data skont ir-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 u (UE) 2018/1725 u d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 jibqgħu applikabbli. B'mod partikolari, jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament ma jipprovdix bażi legali skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 22(2), il-punt (b) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 u l-Artikolu 24(2), il-punt (b) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri u l-fornituri prospettivi fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja tal-IA jiżguraw salvagwardji xierqa u jikkooperaw mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti, inkluż billi jimxu mal-gwida tagħhom u jaġixxu malajr u b'bona fide biex jimmitigaw b'mod adegwat kwalunkwe riskju identifikat għas-sikurezza, is-saħħa u għad-drittijiet fundamentali li jista' jinqala' waqt l-iżvilupp, l-ittestjar, u l-esperimentazzjoni f’dak l-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni.
(140)
This Regulation should provide the legal basis for the providers and prospective providers in the AI regulatory sandbox to use personal data collected for other purposes for developing certain AI systems in the public interest within the AI regulatory sandbox, only under specified conditions, in accordance with Article 6(4) and Article 9(2), point (g), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and Articles 5, 6 and 10 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, and without prejudice to Article 4(2) and Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. All other obligations of data controllers and rights of data subjects under Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 remain applicable. In particular, this Regulation should not provide a legal basis in the meaning of Article 22(2), point (b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 24(2), point (b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Providers and prospective providers in the AI regulatory sandbox should ensure appropriate safeguards and cooperate with the competent authorities, including by following their guidance and acting expeditiously and in good faith to adequately mitigate any identified significant risks to safety, health, and fundamental rights that may arise during the development, testing and experimentation in that sandbox.
(141)
Biex jitħaffef il-proċess tal-iżvilupp u l-introduzzjoni fis-suq tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati f' anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, huwa importanti li l-fornituri jew il-fornituri prospettivi ta' dawn is-sistemi jkunu jistgħu jibbenefikaw ukoll minn reġim speċifiku għall-ittestjar ta' dawk is-sistemi f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali, mingħajr ma jieħdu sehem f'ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA. Madankollu, f'każijiet bħal dawn, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-konsegwenzi possibbli ta' tali ttestjar fuq individwi, jenħtieġ li jiġi żgurat li dan ir-Regolament jintroduċi garanziji u kundizzjonijiet xierqa u suffiċjenti għall-fornituri jew il-fornituri prospettivi. Jenħtieġ li tali garanziji jinkludu, fost l-oħrajn, talba għal kunsens infurmat ta' persuni fiżiċi biex jieħdu sehem fl-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali, bl-eċċezzjoni tal-infurzar tal-liġi fejn it-tiftix ta' kunsens infurmat jipprevjeni s-sistema tal-IA milli tiġi ttestjata. Il-kunsens tas-suġġetti biex jieħdu sehem f'tali ttestjar skont dan ir-Regolament huwa distint minn u mingħajr preġudizzju għall-kunsens tas-suġġetti tad-data għall-ipproċessar tad-data personali tagħhom skont il-liġi rilevanti dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data. Huwa importanti wkoll li jiġu minimizzati r-riskji u li tkun tista' ssir sorveljanza mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti u għalhekk ikun meħtieġ li l-fornituri prospettivi jkollhom pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali sottomess lill-awtorità kompetenti tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, jirreġistraw l-ittestjar f'taqsimiet iddedikati fil-bażi tad-data għall-UE soġġett għal xi eċċezzjonijiet limitati, jistabbilixxu limitazzjonijiet fuq il-perjodu li għalih jista' jsir l-ittestjar u jirrikjedu salvagwardji addizzjonali għal persuni vulnerabbli li jagħmlu parti minn ċerti gruppi vulnerabbli, kif ukoll ftehim bil-miktub li jiddefinixxi r-rwoli u r-responsabbiltajiet tal-fornituri u l-implimentaturi prospettivi u sorveljanza effettiva mill-persunal kompetenti involut fl-ittestjar fid-dinja reali. Barra minn hekk, huwa xieraq li jiġu previsti salvagwardji addizzjonali biex jiġi żgurat li t-tbassir, ir-rakkomandazzjonijiet jew id-deċiżjonijiet tas-sistema tal-IA jkunu jistgħu jitreġġgħu lura u jiġu injorati b'mod effettiv u li d-data personali tiġi protetta u titħassar meta s-suġġetti jkunu rtiraw il-kunsens tagħhom biex jipparteċipaw fl-ittestjar mingħajr preġudizzju għad-drittijiet tagħhom bħala suġġetti tad-data skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data. Fir-rigward tat-trasferiment tad-data, huwa xieraq ukoll li jiġi previst li d-data miġbura u pproċessata għall-fini tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali jenħtieġ li tiġi ttrasferita lil pajjiżi terzi biss fejn jiġu implimentati salvagwardji xierqa u applikabbli skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni, b'mod partikolari f'konformità mal-bażijiet għat-trasferiment ta' data personali skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data, filwaqt li għad-data mhux personali jiġu stabbiliti salvagwardji xierqa f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, bħar-Regolamenti (UE) 2022/868 (42) u (UE) 2023/2854 (43) tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill.
(141)
In order to accelerate the process of development and the placing on the market of the high-risk AI systems listed in an annex to this Regulation, it is important that providers or prospective providers of such systems may also benefit from a specific regime for testing those systems in real world conditions, without participating in an AI regulatory sandbox. However, in such cases, taking into account the possible consequences of such testing on individuals, it should be ensured that appropriate and sufficient guarantees and conditions are introduced by this Regulation for providers or prospective providers. Such guarantees should include, inter alia, requesting informed consent of natural persons to participate in testing in real world conditions, with the exception of law enforcement where the seeking of informed consent would prevent the AI system from being tested. Consent of subjects to participate in such testing under this Regulation is distinct from, and without prejudice to, consent of data subjects for the processing of their personal data under the relevant data protection law. It is also important to minimise the risks and enable oversight by competent authorities and therefore require prospective providers to have a real-world testing plan submitted to competent market surveillance authority, register the testing in dedicated sections in the EU database subject to some limited exceptions, set limitations on the period for which the testing can be done and require additional safeguards for persons belonging to certain vulnerable groups, as well as a written agreement defining the roles and responsibilities of prospective providers and deployers and effective oversight by competent personnel involved in the real world testing. Furthermore, it is appropriate to envisage additional safeguards to ensure that the predictions, recommendations or decisions of the AI system can be effectively reversed and disregarded and that personal data is protected and is deleted when the subjects have withdrawn their consent to participate in the testing without prejudice to their rights as data subjects under the Union data protection law. As regards transfer of data, it is also appropriate to envisage that data collected and processed for the purpose of testing in real-world conditions should be transferred to third countries only where appropriate and applicable safeguards under Union law are implemented, in particular in accordance with bases for transfer of personal data under Union law on data protection, while for non-personal data appropriate safeguards are put in place in accordance with Union law, such as Regulations (EU) 2022/868 (42) and (EU) 2023/2854 (43) of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(142)
Biex jiġi żgurat li l-IA twassal għal eżiti ta' benefiċċju soċjali u ambjentali, l-Istati Membri huma mħeġġa jappoġġaw u jippromwovu r-riċerka u l-iżvilupp ta' soluzzjonijiet tal-IA li jappoġġaw eżiti ta' benefiċċju soċjali u ambjentali, bħal soluzzjonijiet ibbażati fuq l-IA biex tiżdied l-aċċessibbiltà għall-persuni b'diżabbiltà, jiġu indirizzati l-inugwaljanzi soċjoekonomiċi jew biex jintlaħqu miri ambjentali, billi jallokaw ir-riżorsi suffiċjenti, inkluż finanzjament pubbliku u tal-Unjoni, u, fejn xieraq u dment li l-kriterji tal-eliġibbiltà u tal-għażla jiġu ssodisfati, b'kunsiderazzjoni partikolari għal proġetti li għandhom tali objettivi. Jenħtieġ li proġetti bħal dawn ikunu bbażati fuq il-prinċipju ta' kooperazzjoni interdixxiplinari bejn l-iżviluppaturi tal-IA, l-esperti dwar l-inugwaljanza u n-nondiskriminazzjoni, l-aċċessibbiltà, il-konsumatur, id-drittijiet ambjentali u diġitali, kif ukoll l-akkademiċi.
(142)
To ensure that AI leads to socially and environmentally beneficial outcomes, Member States are encouraged to support and promote research and development of AI solutions in support of socially and environmentally beneficial outcomes, such as AI-based solutions to increase accessibility for persons with disabilities, tackle socio-economic inequalities, or meet environmental targets, by allocating sufficient resources, including public and Union funding, and, where appropriate and provided that the eligibility and selection criteria are fulfilled, considering in particular projects which pursue such objectives. Such projects should be based on the principle of interdisciplinary cooperation between AI developers, experts on inequality and non-discrimination, accessibility, consumer, environmental, and digital rights, as well as academics.
(143)
Sabiex tiġi promossa u protetta l-innovazzjoni, huwa importanti li jitqiesu b'mod partikolari l-interessi tal-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda, li huma fornituri jew implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA. Għal dak il-għan, jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jiżviluppaw inizjattivi, immirati lejn dawk l-operaturi, inkluż għas-sensibilizzazzjoni u l-komunikazzjoni tal-informazzjoni. L-Istati Membri jenħtieġ li jipprovdu lill-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda, li jkollhom uffiċċju reġistrat jew fergħa fl-Unjoni, aċċess prijoritarju għal ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA dment li jissodisfaw il-kundizzjonijiet tal-eliġibbiltà u l-kriterji tal-għażla u mingħajr ma jipprekludu lil fornituri u fornituri prospettivi oħra milli jaċċessaw l-ambjenti regolatorji dment li l-istess kundizzjonijiet u kriterji jiġu ssodisfati. L-Istati Membri jenħtieġ li jużaw il-mezzi eżistenti u, meta xieraq, jistabbilixxu mezzi ddedikati ġodda għall-komunikazzjoni mal-SMEs, inkluż man-negozji ġodda, mal-implimentaturi, ma' innovaturi oħrajn, u kif xieraq, mal-awtoritajiet pubbliċi lokali, biex jappoġġaw lill-SMEs fil-perkors kollu tal-iżvilupp tagħhom billi jipprovdu gwida u jwieġbu domandi dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Meta xieraq, dawn il-mezzi jenħtieġ li jaħdmu flimkien biex joħolqu sinerġiji u jiżguraw l-omoġeneità fil-gwida tagħhom lill-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda, u l-implimentaturi. Jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jiffaċilitaw ukoll il-parteċipazzjoni tal-SMEs u ta' partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti oħra fil-proċess tal-iżvilupp tal-istandardizzazzjoni. Barra minn hekk, meta l-korpi notifikati jistabbilixxu tariffi għall-valutazzjoni tal-konformità, jenħtieġ li jitqiesu l-interessi u l-ħtiġijiet speċifiċi tal-fornituri li huma SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda. Jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tevalwa b'mod regolari l-kostijiet ta' ċertifikazzjoni u konformità għall-SMEs inkluż għan-negozji ġodda, permezz ta' konsultazzjonijiet trasparenti u jenħtieġ li taħdem mal-Istati Membri biex tnaqqas dawn il-kostijiet. Pereżempju, il-kostijiet tat-traduzzjoni relatata mad-dokumentazzjoni obbligatorja u l-komunikazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet jistgħu jikkostitwixxu kost sinifikanti għall-fornituri u għal operaturi oħra, b'mod partikolari għal dawk fuq skala iżgħar. Jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri possibbilment jiżguraw li waħda mil-lingwi determinati u aċċettati minnhom għad-dokumentazzjoni tal-fornituri rilevanti u għall-komunikazzjoni mal-operaturi tkun waħda li tinftiehem b'mod wiesa' mill-akbar għadd ta' implimentaturi transfruntieri possibbli. Sabiex jiġu indirizzati l-ħtiġijiet speċifiċi tal-SMEs inkluż tan-negozji ġodda, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tipprovdi mudelli standardizzati għall-oqsma koperti minn dan ir-Regolament fuq talba tal-Bord. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tikkomplementa l-isforzi tal-Istati Membri billi tipprovdi pjattaforma ta' informazzjoni unika b'informazzjoni faċli biex tintuża fir-rigward ta' dan ir-Regolament għall-fornituri u l-implimentaturi kollha, billi torganizza kampanji ta' komunikazzjoni adatti biex tqajjem kuxjenza dwar l-obbligi li jirriżultaw minn dan ir-Regolament, u billi tevalwa u tippromwovi l-konverġenza tal-aħjar prattiki fil-proċeduri tal-akkwist pubbliku fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA. Jenħtieġ li l-intrapriżi ta' daqs medju li sa reċentement kienu jikkwalifikaw bħala intrapriżi żgħar skont it-tifsira tal-Anness tar-Rakkomandazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2003/361/KE (44) jkollhom aċċess għal dawk il-miżuri ta' appoġġ peress li dawk l-intrapriżi ġodda ta' daqs medju ġodda xi drabi jistgħu ma jkollhomx ir-riżorsi legali u t-taħriġ meħtieġa biex jiżguraw fehim xieraq ta' dan ir-Regolament u konformità miegħu.
(143)
In order to promote and protect innovation, it is important that the interests of SMEs, including start-ups, that are providers or deployers of AI systems are taken into particular account. To that end, Member States should develop initiatives, which are targeted at those operators, including on awareness raising and information communication. Member States should provide SMEs, including start-ups, that have a registered office or a branch in the Union, with priority access to the AI regulatory sandboxes provided that they fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria and without precluding other providers and prospective providers to access the sandboxes provided the same conditions and criteria are fulfilled. Member States should utilise existing channels and where appropriate, establish new dedicated channels for communication with SMEs, including start-ups, deployers, other innovators and, as appropriate, local public authorities, to support SMEs throughout their development path by providing guidance and responding to queries about the implementation of this Regulation. Where appropriate, these channels should work together to create synergies and ensure homogeneity in their guidance to SMEs, including start-ups, and deployers. Additionally, Member States should facilitate the participation of SMEs and other relevant stakeholders in the standardisation development processes. Moreover, the specific interests and needs of providers that are SMEs, including start-ups, should be taken into account when notified bodies set conformity assessment fees. The Commission should regularly assess the certification and compliance costs for SMEs, including start-ups, through transparent consultations and should work with Member States to lower such costs. For example, translation costs related to mandatory documentation and communication with authorities may constitute a significant cost for providers and other operators, in particular those of a smaller scale. Member States should possibly ensure that one of the languages determined and accepted by them for relevant providers’ documentation and for communication with operators is one which is broadly understood by the largest possible number of cross-border deployers. In order to address the specific needs of SMEs, including start-ups, the Commission should provide standardised templates for the areas covered by this Regulation, upon request of the Board. Additionally, the Commission should complement Member States’ efforts by providing a single information platform with easy-to-use information with regards to this Regulation for all providers and deployers, by organising appropriate communication campaigns to raise awareness about the obligations arising from this Regulation, and by evaluating and promoting the convergence of best practices in public procurement procedures in relation to AI systems. Medium-sized enterprises which until recently qualified as small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (44) should have access to those support measures, as those new medium-sized enterprises may sometimes lack the legal resources and training necessary to ensure proper understanding of, and compliance with, this Regulation.
(144)
Sabiex tiġi promossa u protetta l-innovazzjoni, jenħtieġ li l-pjattaforma tal-IA fuq talba, il-programmi u l-proġetti ta' finanzjament rilevanti kollha tal-Unjoni, bħall-Programm Ewropa Diġitali, Orizzont Ewropa, implimentati mill-Kummissjoni u mill-Istati Membri fil-livell tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali, jikkontribwixxu, kif xieraq, għall-kisba tal-objettivi ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(144)
In order to promote and protect innovation, the AI-on-demand platform, all relevant Union funding programmes and projects, such as Digital Europe Programme, Horizon Europe, implemented by the Commission and the Member States at Union or national level should, as appropriate, contribute to the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation.
(145)
Sabiex jiġu minimizzati r-riskji għall-implimentazzjoni li jirriżultaw minn nuqqas ta' għarfien u kompetenza esperta fis-suq kif ukoll biex tiġi ffaċilitata l-konformità tal-fornituri, b'mod partikolari l-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda, u l-korpi notifikati mal-obbligi tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-pjattaforma tal-IA fuq talba, iċ-Ċentri Ewropej tal-Innovazzjoni Diġitali u l-Faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u tal-esperimentazzjoni stabbiliti mill-Kummissjoni u mill-Istati Membri fil-livell tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali jikkontribwixxu għall-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Fil-missjonijiet u l-oqsma ta' kompetenza rispettivi tagħhom, il-pjattaforma tal-IA fuq talba, iċ-Ċentri Ewropej tal-Innovazzjoni Diġitali u l-Faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u tal-esperimentazzjoni jistgħu jipprovdu b'mod partikolari appoġġ tekniku u xjentifiku lill-fornituri u lill-korpi notifikati.
(145)
In order to minimise the risks to implementation resulting from lack of knowledge and expertise in the market as well as to facilitate compliance of providers, in particular SMEs, including start-ups, and notified bodies with their obligations under this Regulation, the AI-on-demand platform, the European Digital Innovation Hubs and the testing and experimentation facilities established by the Commission and the Member States at Union or national level should contribute to the implementation of this Regulation. Within their respective mission and fields of competence, the AI-on-demand platform, the European Digital Innovation Hubs and the testing and experimentation Facilities are able to provide in particular technical and scientific support to providers and notified bodies.
(146)
Barra minn hekk, fid-dawl tad-daqs żgħir ħafna ta' xi operaturi u sabiex tiġi żgurata l-proporzjonalità fir-rigward tal-kostijiet tal-innovazzjoni, jixraq li l-mikrointrapriżi jitħallew jissodisfaw wieħed mill-aktar obbligi għaljin, jiġifieri l-istabbiliment ta' sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità, b'mod simplifikat li tnaqqas il-piż amministrattiv u l-kostijiet għal dawk l-intrapriżi mingħajr ma jiġi affettwat il-livell ta' protezzjoni u l-ħtieġa ta' konformità mar-rekwiżiti għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tiżviluppa linji gwida biex tispeċifika l-elementi tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità li għandhom jiġu ssodisfati b'dan il-mod simplifikat mill-mikrointrapriżi.
(146)
Moreover, in light of the very small size of some operators and in order to ensure proportionality regarding costs of innovation, it is appropriate to allow microenterprises to fulfil one of the most costly obligations, namely to establish a quality management system, in a simplified manner which would reduce the administrative burden and the costs for those enterprises without affecting the level of protection and the need for compliance with the requirements for high-risk AI systems. The Commission should develop guidelines to specify the elements of the quality management system to be fulfilled in this simplified manner by microenterprises.
(147)
Jixraq li l-Kummissjoni tiffaċilita, sa fejn ikun possibbli, l-aċċess għall-faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u tal-esperimentazzjoni għall-korpi, il-gruppi jew il-laboratorji stabbiliti jew akkreditati skont kwalunkwe leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni u li jissodisfaw kompiti fil-kuntest ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità ta' prodotti jew ta' apparati koperti minn dik il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni. Dan hu partikolarment il-każ fir-rigward tal-gruppi ta' esperti, il-laboratorji esperti u l-laboratorji ta' referenza fil-qasam tal-apparati mediċi skont ir-Regolamenti (UE) 2017/745 u (UE) 2017/746.
(147)
It is appropriate that the Commission facilitates, to the extent possible, access to testing and experimentation facilities to bodies, groups or laboratories established or accredited pursuant to any relevant Union harmonisation legislation and which fulfil tasks in the context of conformity assessment of products or devices covered by that Union harmonisation legislation. This is, in particular, the case as regards expert panels, expert laboratories and reference laboratories in the field of medical devices pursuant to Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746.
(148)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament jistabbilixxi qafas ta' governanza li jippermetti kemm il-koordinazzjoni u l-appoġġ tal-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament fil-livell nazzjonali, kif ukoll it-tisħiħ tal-kapaċitajiet fil-livell tal-Unjoni u l-integrazzjoni tal-partijiet ikkonċernati fil-qasam tal-IA. L-implimentazzjoni u l-infurzar effettivi ta' dan ir-Regolament jirrikjedu qafas ta' governanza li jippermetti l-koordinazzjoni u l-bini ta' kompetenza esperta ċentrali fil-livell tal-Unjoni. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA ġie stabbilit b'Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni (45) u għandu bħala l-missjoni tiegħu li jiżviluppa l-għarfien espert u l-kapaċitajiet tal-Unjoni fil-qasam tal-IA u li jikkontribwixxi għall-implimentazzjoni tal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar l-IA. Jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jiffaċilitaw il-kompiti tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA bil-ħsieb li jiġi appoġġat l-iżvilupp tal-kompetenza esperta u l-kapaċitajiet tal-Unjoni fil-livell tal-Unjoni u li jissaħħaħ il-funzjonament tas-suq uniku diġitali. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li jiġi stabbilit Bord magħmul minn rappreżentanti tal-Istati Membri, bord għall-integrazzjoni tal-komunità xjentifika u forum konsultattiv biex jikkontribwixxi l-kontribut tal-partijiet ikkonċernati għall-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, fil-livell tal-Unjoni u dak nazzjonali. Jenħtieġ li l-iżvilupp tal-kompetenza esperta u tal-kapaċitajiet tal-Unjoni jinkludi wkoll l-użu tar-riżorsi u l-kompetenza esperta eżistenti, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' sinerġiji ma' strutturi mibnija fil-kuntest tal-infurzar fil-livell tal-Unjoni ta' liġijiet u sinerġiji oħra ma' inizjattivi relatati fil-livell tal-Unjoni, bħall-Impriża Konġunta EuroHPC u l-faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u tal-esperimentazzjoni tal-IA taħt il-Programm Ewropa Diġitali.
(148)
This Regulation should establish a governance framework that both allows to coordinate and support the application of this Regulation at national level, as well as build capabilities at Union level and integrate stakeholders in the field of AI. The effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation require a governance framework that allows to coordinate and build up central expertise at Union level. The AI Office was established by Commission Decision (45) and has as its mission to develop Union expertise and capabilities in the field of AI and to contribute to the implementation of Union law on AI. Member States should facilitate the tasks of the AI Office with a view to support the development of Union expertise and capabilities at Union level and to strengthen the functioning of the digital single market. Furthermore, a Board composed of representatives of the Member States, a scientific panel to integrate the scientific community and an advisory forum to contribute stakeholder input to the implementation of this Regulation, at Union and national level, should be established. The development of Union expertise and capabilities should also include making use of existing resources and expertise, in particular through synergies with structures built up in the context of the Union level enforcement of other law and synergies with related initiatives at Union level, such as the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking and the AI testing and experimentation facilities under the Digital Europe Programme.
(149)
Sabiex tiġi ffaċilitata implimentazzjoni bla xkiel, effettiva u armonizzata ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ jiġi stabbilit Bord. Jenħtieġ li l-Bord jirrifletti d-diversi interessi tal-ekosistema tal-IA u jkun magħmul minn rappreżentanti tal-Istati Membri. Jenħtieġ li l-Bord ikun responsabbli għal għadd ta' kompiti konsultattivi, inkluż l-għoti ta' opinjonijiet, rakkomandazzjonijiet, pariri jew kontribut għall-gwida dwar kwistjonijiet relatati mal-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż dwar kwistjonijiet ta' infurzar, speċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi jew standards eżistenti rigward ir-rekwiżiti stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament u l-għoti ta' pariri lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri u l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti tagħhom dwar kwistjonijiet speċifiċi relatati mal-IA. Sabiex tingħata xi flessibbiltà lill-Istati Membri fid-deżinjazzjoni tar-rappreżentanti tagħhom fil-Bord, tali rappreżentanti jistgħu jkunu kwalunkwe persuna li tappartjeni għal entitajiet pubbliċi li jenħtieġ li jkollha l-kompetenzi u s-setgħat rilevanti biex tiffaċilita l-koordinazzjoni fil-livell nazzjonali u tikkontribwixxi għall-kisba tal-kompiti tal-Bord. Jenħtieġ li l-Bord jistabbilixxi żewġ sottogruppi permanenti biex tiġi pprovduta pjattaforma għall-kooperazzjoni u l-iskambju fost l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-awtoritajiet tan-notifika dwar kwistjonijiet relatati rispettivament mas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-korpi notifikati. Jenħtieġ li s-sottogrupp permanenti għas-sorveljanza tas-suq jaġixxi bħala l-grupp ta' kooperazzjoni amministrattiva (ADCO) għal dan ir-Regolament skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 30 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020. F'konformità mal-Artikolu 33 ta' dak ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tappoġġa l-attivitajiet tas-sottogrupp permanenti għas-sorveljanza tas-suq billi twettaq evalwazzjonijiet jew studji tas-suq, partikolarment bil-ħsieb li tidentifika aspetti ta' dan ir-Regolament li jirrikjedu koordinazzjoni speċifika u urġenti fost l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq. Il-Bord jista' jistabbilixxi sottogruppi permanenti jew temporanji oħra kif xieraq għall-fini tal-eżaminazzjoni ta' kwistjonijiet speċifiċi. Jenħtieġ li l-Bord jikkoopera wkoll, kif xieraq, mal-korpi, il-gruppi ta' esperti u n-networks rilevanti tal-Unjoni attivi fil-kuntest tal-liġijiet rilevanti tal-Unjoni, inkluż b'mod partikolari dawk attivi skont il-liġijiet rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar id-data, il-prodotti u s-servizzi diġitali.
(149)
In order to facilitate a smooth, effective and harmonised implementation of this Regulation a Board should be established. The Board should reflect the various interests of the AI eco-system and be composed of representatives of the Member States. The Board should be responsible for a number of advisory tasks, including issuing opinions, recommendations, advice or contributing to guidance on matters related to the implementation of this Regulation, including on enforcement matters, technical specifications or existing standards regarding the requirements established in this Regulation and providing advice to the Commission and the Member States and their national competent authorities on specific questions related to AI. In order to give some flexibility to Member States in the designation of their representatives in the Board, such representatives may be any persons belonging to public entities who should have the relevant competences and powers to facilitate coordination at national level and contribute to the achievement of the Board’s tasks. The Board should establish two standing sub-groups to provide a platform for cooperation and exchange among market surveillance authorities and notifying authorities on issues related, respectively, to market surveillance and notified bodies. The standing subgroup for market surveillance should act as the administrative cooperation group (ADCO) for this Regulation within the meaning of Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. In accordance with Article 33 of that Regulation, the Commission should support the activities of the standing subgroup for market surveillance by undertaking market evaluations or studies, in particular with a view to identifying aspects of this Regulation requiring specific and urgent coordination among market surveillance authorities. The Board may establish other standing or temporary sub-groups as appropriate for the purpose of examining specific issues. The Board should also cooperate, as appropriate, with relevant Union bodies, experts groups and networks active in the context of relevant Union law, including in particular those active under relevant Union law on data, digital products and services.
(150)
Bil-ħsieb li jiġi żgurat l-involviment tal-partijiet ikkonċernati fl-implimentazzjoni u l-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li jiġi stabbilit forum konsultattiv biex jagħti pariri u jipprovdi kompetenza esperta teknika lill-Bord u lill-Kummissjoni. Sabiex tiġi żgurata rappreżentanza varjata u bbilanċjata tal-partijiet ikkonċernati bejn l-interess kummerċjali u dak mhux kummerċjali u, fil-kategorija tal-interessi kummerċjali, fir-rigward tal-SMEs u impriżi oħra, jenħtieġ li l-forum konsultattiv jinkludi, fost l-oħrajn, l-industrija, in-negozji ġodda, l-SMEs, id-dinja akkademika, is-soċjetà ċivili, inkluż is-sħab soċjali, kif ukoll l-Aġenzija għad-Drittijiet Fundamentali, l-ENISA, il-Kumitat Ewropew għall-Istandardizzazzjoni (CEN), il-Kumitat Ewropew għall-Istandardizzazzjoni Elettroteknika (CENELEC) u l-Istitut Ewropew tal-Istandards tat-Telekomunikazzjoni (ETSI).
(150)
With a view to ensuring the involvement of stakeholders in the implementation and application of this Regulation, an advisory forum should be established to advise and provide technical expertise to the Board and the Commission. To ensure a varied and balanced stakeholder representation between commercial and non-commercial interest and, within the category of commercial interests, with regards to SMEs and other undertakings, the advisory forum should comprise inter alia industry, start-ups, SMEs, academia, civil society, including the social partners, as well as the Fundamental Rights Agency, ENISA, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
(151)
Jenħtieġ li jiġi stabbilit bord ta' esperti indipendenti biex jiġu appoġġati l-implimentazzjoni u l-infurzar ta' dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari l-attivitajiet ta' monitoraġġ tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA fir-rigward tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Jenħtieġ li l-esperti indipendenti li jikkostitwixxu l-bord jintgħażlu abbażi ta' kompetenza esperta xjentifika jew teknika aġġornata fil-qasam tal-IA u għandhom iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom b'imparzjalità u oġġettività u jiżguraw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni u tad-data miksuba fit-twettiq tal-kompiti u l-attivitajiet tagħhom. Sabiex ikun possibli t-tisħiħ tal-kapaċitajiet nazzjonali meħtieġa għall-infurzar effettiv ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jkunu jistgħu jitolbu appoġġ mill-grupp ta' esperti li jikkostitwixxu l-bord għall-attivitajiet ta' infurzar tagħhom.
(151)
To support the implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, in particular the monitoring activities of the AI Office as regards general-purpose AI models, a scientific panel of independent experts should be established. The independent experts constituting the scientific panel should be selected on the basis of up-to-date scientific or technical expertise in the field of AI and should perform their tasks with impartiality, objectivity and ensure the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities. To allow the reinforcement of national capacities necessary for the effective enforcement of this Regulation, Member States should be able to request support from the pool of experts constituting the scientific panel for their enforcement activities.
(152)
Jenħtieġ li jiġu stabbiliti u mqiegħda għad-dispożizzjoni tal-Istati Membri, strutturi ta' appoġġ tal-Unjoni għall-ittestjar tal-IA sabiex jiġi appoġġat l-infurzar adegwat fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA u jissaħħu l-kapaċitajiet tal-Istati Membri.
(152)
In order to support adequate enforcement as regards AI systems and reinforce the capacities of the Member States, Union AI testing support structures should be established and made available to the Member States.
(153)
L-Istati Membri jaqdu rwol ewlieni fl-applikazzjoni u fl-infurzar ta' dan ir-Regolament. F'dak ir-rigward, jenħtieġ li kull Stat Membru jiddeżinja minn tal-inqas awtorità tan-notifika waħda u minn tal-inqas awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq waħda bħala awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali bil-għan li jiġu ssorveljati l-applikazzjoni u l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jiddeċiedu li jaħtru kwalunkwe tip ta' entità pubblika biex twettaq il-kompiti tal-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali skont it-tifsira ta' dan ir-Regolament, f'konformità mal-karatteristiċi u l-ħtiġijiet organizzattivi nazzjonali speċifiċi tagħhom. Sabiex tiżdied l-effiċjenza tal-organizzazzjoni fuq in-naħa tal-Istati Membri u biex jiġi stabbilit punt uniku ta' kuntatt għall-pubbliku u għal kontropartijiet oħra fil-livell tal-Istati Membri u f'dak tal-Unjoni, jenħtieġ li kull Stat Membru jiddeżinja awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq biex taġixxi bħala punt uniku ta' kuntatt.
(153)
Member States hold a key role in the application and enforcement of this Regulation. In that respect, each Member State should designate at least one notifying authority and at least one market surveillance authority as national competent authorities for the purpose of supervising the application and implementation of this Regulation. Member States may decide to appoint any kind of public entity to perform the tasks of the national competent authorities within the meaning of this Regulation, in accordance with their specific national organisational characteristics and needs. In order to increase organisation efficiency on the side of Member States and to set a single point of contact vis-à-vis the public and other counterparts at Member State and Union levels, each Member State should designate a market surveillance authority to act as a single point of contact.
(154)
Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali jeżerċitaw is-setgħat tagħhom b'mod indipendenti, imparzjali u mingħajr preġudizzju sabiex jissalvagwardaw il-prinċipji tal-oġġettività tal-attivitajiet u l-kompiti tagħhom u biex jiżguraw l-applikazzjoni u l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li l-membri ta' dawn l-awtoritajiet joqogħdu lura minn kwalunkwe azzjoni inkompatibbli mad-dmirijiet tagħhom u jenħtieġ li jkunu soġġetti għal regoli ta' kunfidenzjalità skont dan ir-Regolament.
(154)
The national competent authorities should exercise their powers independently, impartially and without bias, so as to safeguard the principles of objectivity of their activities and tasks and to ensure the application and implementation of this Regulation. The members of these authorities should refrain from any action incompatible with their duties and should be subject to confidentiality rules under this Regulation.
(155)
Sabiex ikun żgurat li l-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jkunu jistgħu jqisu l-esperjenza bl-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għat-titjib tas-sistemi tagħhom u tal-proċess tad-disinn u l-iżvilupp, jew ikunu jistgħu jieħdu xi azzjoni korrettiva possibbli fil-ħin, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri kollha jkollhom fis-seħħ sistema ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq. Meta jkun rilevanti, jenħtieġ li s-sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq tinkludi analiżi tal-interazzjoni ma' sistemi oħra tal-IA inkluż apparati u software ieħor. Jenħtieġ li s-sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq ma tkoprix data operazzjonali sensittiva ta' implimentaturi li huma awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi. Din is-sistema hi kruċjali wkoll biex ikun żgurat li r-riskji possibbli li jirriżultaw mis-sistemi tal-IA li jkomplu “jitgħallmu” wara li jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew jitqiegħdu fis-servizz ikunu jistgħu jiġu indirizzati b'mod aktar effiċjenti u fil-ħin. F'dan il-kuntest, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri jkunu wkoll meħtieġa jkollhom fis-seħħ sistema biex jirrapportaw lura lill-awtoritajiet rilevanti kwalunkwe inċident serju li jirriżulta mill-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA tagħhom, jiġifieri inċident jew funzjonament ħażin li jwassal għal mewt jew ħsara serja għas-saħħa, tfixkil serju u irriversibbli tal-ġestjoni u tal-operat ta' infrastruttura kritika, ksur tal-obbligi skont liġijiet tal-Unjoni maħsuba biex jipproteġu d-drittijiet fundamentali jew dannu serju lill-proprjetà jew lill-ambjent.
(155)
In order to ensure that providers of high-risk AI systems can take into account the experience on the use of high-risk AI systems for improving their systems and the design and development process or can take any possible corrective action in a timely manner, all providers should have a post-market monitoring system in place. Where relevant, post-market monitoring should include an analysis of the interaction with other AI systems including other devices and software. Post-market monitoring should not cover sensitive operational data of deployers which are law enforcement authorities. This system is also key to ensure that the possible risks emerging from AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service can be more efficiently and timely addressed. In this context, providers should also be required to have a system in place to report to the relevant authorities any serious incidents resulting from the use of their AI systems, meaning incident or malfunctioning leading to death or serious damage to health, serious and irreversible disruption of the management and operation of critical infrastructure, infringements of obligations under Union law intended to protect fundamental rights or serious damage to property or the environment.
(156)
Sabiex ikun żgurat infurzar xieraq u effettiv tar-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi stipulati b'dan ir-Regolament, li huwa leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni, jenħtieġ li s-sistema tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u tal-konformità tal-prodotti stabbilita bir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 tapplika fl-intier tagħha. Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq deżinjati skont dan ir-Regolament ikollhom is-setgħat kollha ta' infurzar stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament u fir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 u jenħtieġ li jeżerċitaw is-setgħat tagħhom u jwettqu dmirijiethom b'mod indipendenti, imparzjali u mingħajr preġudizzju. Minkejja li l-maġġoranza tas-sistemi tal-IA mhumiex soġġetti għal rekwiżiti u obbligi speċifiċi skont dan ir-Regolament, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jistgħu jieħdu miżuri fir-rigward tas-sistemi kollha tal-IA meta jippreżentaw riskju f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament. Minħabba n-natura speċifika tal-istituzzjonijiet, l-aġenziji u l-korpi tal-Unjoni li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, huwa xieraq li l-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data jiġi deżinjat bħala awtorità kompetenti tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għalihom. Jenħtieġ li dan ikun mingħajr preġudizzju għad-deżinjazzjoni tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti mill-Istati Membri. Jenħtieġ li l-attivitajiet ta' sorveljanza tas-suq ma jaffettwawx il-kapaċità tal-entitajiet taħt superviżjoni li jwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom b'mod indipendenti, meta tali indipendenza tkun meħtieġa mil-liġi tal-Unjoni.
(156)
In order to ensure an appropriate and effective enforcement of the requirements and obligations set out by this Regulation, which is Union harmonisation legislation, the system of market surveillance and compliance of products established by Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 should apply in its entirety. Market surveillance authorities designated pursuant to this Regulation should have all enforcement powers laid down in this Regulation and in Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and should exercise their powers and carry out their duties independently, impartially and without bias. Although the majority of AI systems are not subject to specific requirements and obligations under this Regulation, market surveillance authorities may take measures in relation to all AI systems when they present a risk in accordance with this Regulation. Due to the specific nature of Union institutions, agencies and bodies falling within the scope of this Regulation, it is appropriate to designate the European Data Protection Supervisor as a competent market surveillance authority for them. This should be without prejudice to the designation of national competent authorities by the Member States. Market surveillance activities should not affect the ability of the supervised entities to carry out their tasks independently, when such independence is required by Union law.
(157)
Dan ir-Regolament huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għall-kompetenzi, il-kompiti, is-setgħat u l-indipendenza tal-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi pubbliċi nazzjonali rilevanti li jissorveljaw l-applikazzjoni tal-liġi tal-Unjoni li tipproteġi d-drittijiet fundamentali, inkluż il-korpi tal-ugwaljanza u l-awtoritajiet tal-protezzjoni tad-data. Fejn meħtieġ għall-mandat tagħhom, jenħtieġ li dawk l-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi pubbliċi jkollhom aċċess ukoll għal kwalunkwe dokumentazzjoni maħluqa skont dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li tiġi stabbilita proċedura ta' salvagwardja speċifika biex jiġi żgurat infurzar adegwat u f'waqtu kontra s-sistemi tal-IA li jippreżentaw riskju għas-saħħa, is-sikurezza u d-drittijiet fundamentali. Jenħtieġ li l-proċedura għal tali sistemi tal-IA li jippreżentaw riskju tiġi applikata għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jippreżentaw riskju, għas-sistemi pprojbiti li ġew introdotti fis-suq, tqiegħdu fis-servizz jew ntużaw bi ksur tal-prattiki pprojbiti stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament u għas-sistemi tal-IA li saru disponibbli bi ksur tar-rekwiżiti ta' trasparenza stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament u li jippreżentaw riskju.
(157)
This Regulation is without prejudice to the competences, tasks, powers and independence of relevant national public authorities or bodies which supervise the application of Union law protecting fundamental rights, including equality bodies and data protection authorities. Where necessary for their mandate, those national public authorities or bodies should also have access to any documentation created under this Regulation. A specific safeguard procedure should be set for ensuring adequate and timely enforcement against AI systems presenting a risk to health, safety and fundamental rights. The procedure for such AI systems presenting a risk should be applied to high-risk AI systems presenting a risk, prohibited systems which have been placed on the market, put into service or used in violation of the prohibited practices laid down in this Regulation and AI systems which have been made available in violation of the transparency requirements laid down in this Regulation and present a risk.
(158)
Il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji tinkludi regoli u rekwiżiti interni dwar il-governanza u l-ġestjoni tar-riskju li huma applikabbli għall-istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji regolati waqt il-forniment ta' dawk is-servizzi, inkluż meta jużaw is-sistemi tal-IA. Sabiex ikunu żgurati applikazzjoni u infurzar koerenti tal-obbligi skont dan ir-Regolament u tar-regoli u r-rekwiżiti rilevanti tal-atti legali tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji, jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti għas-superviżjoni u l-infurzar ta' dawk l-atti legali, b'mod partikolari l-awtoritajiet kompetenti kif definiti fir-Regolament (UE) Nru 575/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (46) u d-Direttivi 2008/48/KE (47), 2009/138/KE (48), 2013/36/UE (49), 2014/17/UE (50) u (UE) 2016/97 (51) tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, jiġu ddeżinjati, fil-kompetenzi rispettivi tagħhom, bħala awtoritajiet kompetenti għall-fini tas-superviżjoni tal-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż għal attivitajiet ta' sorveljanza tas-suq, fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA pprovduti jew użati minn istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji regolati u sorveljati sakemm l-Istati Membri ma jiddeċidux li jiddeżinjaw awtorità oħra biex twettaq dawn il-kompiti ta' sorveljanza tas-suq. Jenħtieġ li dawk l-awtoritajiet kompetenti jkollhom is-setgħat kollha skont dan ir-Regolament u r-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 biex jinfurzaw ir-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż is-setgħat li jwettqu l-attivitajiet ta' sorveljanza tas-suq ex post li jistgħu jiġu integrati, kif xieraq, fil-mekkaniżmi u l-proċeduri superviżorji eżistenti tagħhom skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji. Huwa xieraq li jiġi previst li jenħtieġ li, meta jaġixxu bħala awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq skont dan ir-Regolament, l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali responsabbli għas-superviżjoni tal-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu regolati skont id-Direttiva 2013/36/UE, li jkunu qed jipparteċipaw fil-Mekkaniżmu Superviżorju Uniku stabbilit bir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (UE) Nru 1024/2013 (52), jirrappurtaw, mingħajr dewmien, lill-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew kwalunkwe informazzjoni identifikata matul l-attivitajiet tagħhom ta' sorveljanza tas-suq li tista' tkun ta' interess potenzjali għall-kompiti superviżorji prudenzjali tal-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew kif speċifikat f'dak ir-Regolament. Biex tkompli tissaħħaħ il-konsistenza bejn dan ir-Regolament u r-regoli applikabbli għall-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu rregolati skont id-Direttiva 2013/36/UE, jixraq ukoll li xi wħud mill-obbligi proċedurali tal-fornituri fir-rigward tal-ġestjoni tar-riskju, il-monitoraġġ ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq u tad-dokumentazzjoni jiġu integrati fl-obbligi u l-proċeduri eżistenti skont id-Direttiva 2013/36/UE. Sabiex ikun evitat it-trikkib, jenħtieġ li jiġu previsti wkoll derogi limitati fir-rigward tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità tal-fornituri u l-obbligu ta' monitoraġġ impost fuq l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli sa fejn dawn ikunu japplikaw għall-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu regolati bid-Direttiva 2013/36/UE. Jenħtieġ li l-istess reġim japplika għall-impriżi tal-assigurazzjoni u tar-riassigurazzjoni u l-kumpaniji azzjonarji tal-assigurazzjoni skont id-Direttiva 2009/138/KE u l-intermedjarji tal-assigurazzjoni skont id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/97 u tipi oħra ta' istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji soġġetti għal rekwiżiti rigward il-governanza interna, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi stabbiliti skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji biex jiġu żgurati l-konsistenza u t-trattament ugwali fis-settur finanzjarju.
(158)
Union financial services law includes internal governance and risk-management rules and requirements which are applicable to regulated financial institutions in the course of provision of those services, including when they make use of AI systems. In order to ensure coherent application and enforcement of the obligations under this Regulation and relevant rules and requirements of the Union financial services legal acts, the competent authorities for the supervision and enforcement of those legal acts, in particular competent authorities as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (46) and Directives 2008/48/EC (47), 2009/138/EC (48), 2013/36/EU (49), 2014/17/EU (50) and (EU) 2016/97 (51) of the European Parliament and of the Council, should be designated, within their respective competences, as competent authorities for the purpose of supervising the implementation of this Regulation, including for market surveillance activities, as regards AI systems provided or used by regulated and supervised financial institutions unless Member States decide to designate another authority to fulfil these market surveillance tasks. Those competent authorities should have all powers under this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 to enforce the requirements and obligations of this Regulation, including powers to carry our ex post market surveillance activities that can be integrated, as appropriate, into their existing supervisory mechanisms and procedures under the relevant Union financial services law. It is appropriate to envisage that, when acting as market surveillance authorities under this Regulation, the national authorities responsible for the supervision of credit institutions regulated under Directive 2013/36/EU, which are participating in the Single Supervisory Mechanism established by Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 (52), should report, without delay, to the European Central Bank any information identified in the course of their market surveillance activities that may be of potential interest for the European Central Bank’s prudential supervisory tasks as specified in that Regulation. To further enhance the consistency between this Regulation and the rules applicable to credit institutions regulated under Directive 2013/36/EU, it is also appropriate to integrate some of the providers’ procedural obligations in relation to risk management, post marketing monitoring and documentation into the existing obligations and procedures under Directive 2013/36/EU. In order to avoid overlaps, limited derogations should also be envisaged in relation to the quality management system of providers and the monitoring obligation placed on deployers of high-risk AI systems to the extent that these apply to credit institutions regulated by Directive 2013/36/EU. The same regime should apply to insurance and re-insurance undertakings and insurance holding companies under Directive 2009/138/EC and the insurance intermediaries under Directive (EU) 2016/97 and other types of financial institutions subject to requirements regarding internal governance, arrangements or processes established pursuant to the relevant Union financial services law to ensure consistency and equal treatment in the financial sector.
(159)
Jenħtieġ li kull awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli fil-qasam tal-bijometrika, kif elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament sakemm dawk is-sistemi jintużaw għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, il-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-ġestjoni tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, jew tal-amministrazzjoni tal-ġustizzja u tal-proċessi demokratiċi, ikollha setgħat investigattivi u korrettivi effettivi, inkluż mill-inqas is-setgħa li tikseb aċċess għad-data personali kollha li tkun qed tiġi pproċessata u għall-informazzjoni kollha meħtieġa għat-twettiq tal-kompiti tagħha. Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ikunu jistgħu jeżerċitaw is-setgħat tagħhom billi jaġixxu b'indipendenza sħiħa. Jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe limitazzjoni tal-aċċess tagħhom għal data operazzjonali sensittiva skont dan ir-Regolament tkun mingħajr preġudizzju għas-setgħat mogħtija lilhom mid-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. Jenħtieġ li l-ebda esklużjoni fuq id-divulgazzjoni tad-data lill-awtoritajiet tal-protezzjoni tad-data nazzjonali skont dan ir-Regolament ma taffettwa s-setgħat attwali jew futuri ta' dawk l-awtoritajiet lil hinn mill-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(159)
Each market surveillance authority for high-risk AI systems in the area of biometrics, as listed in an annex to this Regulation insofar as those systems are used for the purposes of law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control management, or the administration of justice and democratic processes, should have effective investigative and corrective powers, including at least the power to obtain access to all personal data that are being processed and to all information necessary for the performance of its tasks. The market surveillance authorities should be able to exercise their powers by acting with complete independence. Any limitations of their access to sensitive operational data under this Regulation should be without prejudice to the powers conferred to them by Directive (EU) 2016/680. No exclusion on disclosing data to national data protection authorities under this Regulation should affect the current or future powers of those authorities beyond the scope of this Regulation.
(160)
Jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-Kummissjoni jkunu jistgħu jipproponu attivitajiet konġunti, inkluż investigazzjonijiet konġunti, li għandhom jitwettqu mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jew mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq b'mod konġunt mal-Kummissjoni, li jkollhom l-għan li jippromwovu l-konformità, jidentifikaw in-nonkonformità, iqajmu kuxjenza u jipprovdu gwida fir-rigward ta' dan ir-Regolament b'rabta ma' kategoriji speċifiċi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jinstabu li jippreżentaw riskju serju f'żewġ Stati Membri jew aktar. Jenħtieġ li l-attivitajiet konġunti għall-promozzjoni tal-konformità jitwettqu f'konformità mal-Artikolu 9 tar-Regolament (UE)2019/1020. Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jipprovdi appoġġ ta' koordinazzjoni għall-investigazzjonijiet konġunti.
(160)
The market surveillance authorities and the Commission should be able to propose joint activities, including joint investigations, to be conducted by market surveillance authorities or market surveillance authorities jointly with the Commission, that have the aim of promoting compliance, identifying non-compliance, raising awareness and providing guidance in relation to this Regulation with respect to specific categories of high-risk AI systems that are found to present a serious risk across two or more Member States. Joint activities to promote compliance should be carried out in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The AI Office should provide coordination support for joint investigations.
(161)
Jenħtieġ li jiġu ċċarati r-responsabbiltajiet u l-kompetenzi fil-livell tal-Unjoni u dak nazzjonali fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA li huma mibnija fuq mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Biex jiġu evitati kompetenzi duplikati, meta sistema tal-IA tkun ibbażata fuq mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u l-mudell u s-sistema jiġu pprovduti mill-istess fornitur, jenħtieġ li s-superviżjoni ssir fil-livell tal-Unjoni permezz tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA, li għandu jkollu s-setgħat ta' awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għal dan il-għan. Fil-każijiet l-oħra kollha, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq nazzjonali jibqgħu responsabbli għas-superviżjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA. Madankollu, għal sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jistgħu jintużaw direttament mill-implimentaturi għal mill-inqas skop wieħed li huwa kklassifikat bħala b'riskju għoli, jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jikkooperaw mal-Uffiċċju għall-IA biex iwettqu evalwazzjonijiet tal-konformità u jinfurmaw lill-Bord u lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq l-oħra skont il-każ. Barra minn hekk, meta l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ma tkunx tista' tikkonkludi investigazzjoni dwar sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli minħabba li ma jkollhiex aċċess għal ċerta informazzjoni relatata mal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li fuqu tkun mibnija s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, jenħtieġ li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ikunu jistgħu jitolbu għajnuna mill-Uffiċċju għall-IA. F'każijiet bħal dawn, jenħtieġ li tapplika mutatis mutandis il-proċedura rigward l-assistenza reċiproka f'każijiet transfruntieri fil-Kapitolu VI tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020.
(161)
It is necessary to clarify the responsibilities and competences at Union and national level as regards AI systems that are built on general-purpose AI models. To avoid overlapping competences, where an AI system is based on a general-purpose AI model and the model and system are provided by the same provider, the supervision should take place at Union level through the AI Office, which should have the powers of a market surveillance authority within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 for this purpose. In all other cases, national market surveillance authorities remain responsible for the supervision of AI systems. However, for general-purpose AI systems that can be used directly by deployers for at least one purpose that is classified as high-risk, market surveillance authorities should cooperate with the AI Office to carry out evaluations of compliance and inform the Board and other market surveillance authorities accordingly. Furthermore, market surveillance authorities should be able to request assistance from the AI Office where the market surveillance authority is unable to conclude an investigation on a high-risk AI system because of its inability to access certain information related to the general-purpose AI model on which the high-risk AI system is built. In such cases, the procedure regarding mutual assistance in cross-border cases in Chapter VI of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 should apply mutatis mutandis.
(162)
Biex isir l-aħjar użu mill-kompetenza esperta u s-sinerġiji ċentralizzati tal-Unjoni fil-livell tal-Unjoni, jenħtieġ li s-setgħat ta' superviżjoni u infurzar tal-obbligi fuq il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jkunu kompetenza tal-Kummissjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jkun jista' jwettaq l-azzjonijiet kollha meħtieġa biex jissorvelja l-implimentazzjoni effettiva ta' dan ir-Regolament fir-rigward tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Jenħtieġ li jkun jista' jinvestiga ksur possibbli tar-regoli dwar il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kemm fuq inizjattiva tiegħu stess, b'segwitu għar-riżultati tal-attivitajiet ta' monitoraġġ tiegħu, kif ukoll fuq talba mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq f'konformità mal-kundizzjonijiet stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li, biex tappoġġa l-monitoraġġ effettiv tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA, tipprevedi l-possibbiltà li l-fornituri downstream iressqu lmenti dwar ksur possibbli tar-regoli dwar il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA u ta’ mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali.
(162)
To make best use of the centralised Union expertise and synergies at Union level, the powers of supervision and enforcement of the obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models should be a competence of the Commission. The AI Office should be able to carry out all necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation of this Regulation as regards general-purpose AI models. It should be able to investigate possible infringements of the rules on providers of general-purpose AI models both on its own initiative, following the results of its monitoring activities, or upon request from market surveillance authorities in line with the conditions set out in this Regulation. To support effective monitoring of the AI Office, it should provide for the possibility that downstream providers lodge complaints about possible infringements of the rules on providers of general-purpose AI models and systems.
(163)
Bil-ħsieb li jikkomplementa s-sistemi ta' governanza għall-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, jenħtieġ li l-bord jappoġġa l-attivitajiet ta' monitoraġġ tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA u jista', f'ċerti każijiet, jipprovdi allerti kwalifikati lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA li jiskattaw segwitu bħal investigazzjonijiet. Dan jenħtieġ li jkun il-każ meta l-bord ikollu raġuni biex jissuspetta li mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali joħloq riskju konkret u identifikabbli fil-livell tal-Unjoni. Barra minn hekk, dan jenħtieġ li jkun il-każ meta l-bord ikollu raġuni biex jissuspetta li mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jissodisfa l-kriterji li jwasslu għal klassifikazzjoni bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku. Sabiex il-bord ikollu l-informazzjoni meħtieġa għat-twettiq ta' dawk il-kompiti, jenħtieġ li jkun hemm mekkaniżmu li permezz tiegħu l-bord ikun jista' jitlob lill-Kummissjoni titlob dokumentazzjoni jew informazzjoni mingħand fornitur.
(163)
With a view to complementing the governance systems for general-purpose AI models, the scientific panel should support the monitoring activities of the AI Office and may, in certain cases, provide qualified alerts to the AI Office which trigger follow-ups, such as investigations. This should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model poses a concrete and identifiable risk at Union level. Furthermore, this should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model meets the criteria that would lead to a classification as general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. To equip the scientific panel with the information necessary for the performance of those tasks, there should be a mechanism whereby the scientific panel can request the Commission to require documentation or information from a provider.
(164)
Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jkun jista' jieħu l-azzjonijiet meħtieġa biex jimmonitorja l-implimentazzjoni effettiva u l-konformità mal-obbligi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament. Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jkun jista' jinvestiga ksur possibbli f'konformità mas-setgħat previsti f'dan ir-Regolament, inkluż billi jitlob dokumentazzjoni u informazzjoni, billi jwettaq evalwazzjonijiet, kif ukoll billi jitlob miżuri mill-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Meta jwettaq l-evalwazzjonijiet, sabiex isir użu minn kompetenza esperta indipendenti, jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jkun jista' jinvolvi esperti indipendenti biex iwettqu l-evalwazzjonijiet f'ismu. Jenħtieġ li l-konformità mal-obbligi tkun infurzabbli, fost l-oħrajn, permezz ta' talbiet biex jittieħdu miżuri xierqa, inkluż miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni tar-riskju fil-każ ta' riskji sistemiċi identifikati kif ukoll ir-restrizzjoni tad-disponibbiltà fis-suq, l-irtirar jew is-sejħa lura tal-mudell. Bħala salvagwardja, fejn meħtieġ lil hinn mid-drittijiet proċedurali previsti f'dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jkollhom id-drittijiet proċedurali previsti fl-Artikolu 18 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, li għandhom japplikaw mutatis mutandis, mingħajr preġudizzju għal drittijiet proċedurali aktar speċifiċi previsti minn dan ir-Regolament.
(164)
The AI Office should be able to take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation of and compliance with the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models laid down in this Regulation. The AI Office should be able to investigate possible infringements in accordance with the powers provided for in this Regulation, including by requesting documentation and information, by conducting evaluations, as well as by requesting measures from providers of general-purpose AI models. When conducting evaluations, in order to make use of independent expertise, the AI Office should be able to involve independent experts to carry out the evaluations on its behalf. Compliance with the obligations should be enforceable, inter alia, through requests to take appropriate measures, including risk mitigation measures in the case of identified systemic risks as well as restricting the making available on the market, withdrawing or recalling the model. As a safeguard, where needed beyond the procedural rights provided for in this Regulation, providers of general-purpose AI models should have the procedural rights provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, which should apply mutatis mutandis, without prejudice to more specific procedural rights provided for by this Regulation.
(165)
L-iżvilupp ta' sistemi tal-IA minbarra sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament, jista' jwassal għal użu akbar ta' IA etika u affidabbli fl-Unjoni. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA li mhumiex b'riskju għoli jiġu mħeġġa joħolqu kodiċijiet tal-kondotta, inkluż mekkaniżmi ta' governanza relatati, maħsuba biex irawmu l-applikazzjoni volontarja ta' xi wħud mir-rekwiżiti obbligatorji jew tar-rekwiżiti kollha applikabbli għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, adattati fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tas-sistemi u r-riskju aktar baxx involut u filwaqt li jitqiesu s-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi disponibbli u l-aħjar prattiki tal-industrija bħal kards mudell u kards tad-data. Jenħtieġ li l-fornituri u, kif xieraq, l-implimentaturi tas-sistemi kollha tal-IA, b'riskju għoli jew le, u l-mudelli tal-IA jiġu wkoll mħeġġa japplikaw fuq bażi volontarja rekwiżiti addizzjonali relatati, pereżempju, mal-elementi tal-Linji Gwida tal-Unjoni dwar l-Etika għal IA Affidabbli, sostenibbiltà ambjentali, miżuri ta' litteriżmu fl-IA, disinn u żvilupp inklużivi u diversi tas-sistemi tal-IA, inkluż l-attenzjoni għall-persuni vulnerabbli u l-aċċessibbiltà għall-persuni b'diżabbiltà, il-parteċipazzjoni tal-partijiet ikkonċernati bl-involviment kif xieraq, tal-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti bħall-organizzazzjonijiet tan-negozju u tas-soċjetà ċivili, id-dinja akkademika, l-organizzazzjonijiet tar-riċerka, it-trade unions u l-organizzazzjonijiet tal-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur fid-disinn u l-iżvilupp tas-sistemi tal-IA, u d-diversità tat-timijiet tal-iżvilupp, inkluż il-bilanċ bejn il-ġeneri. Sabiex jiġi żgurat li l-kodiċijiet ta' kondotta volontarji jkunu effettivi, jenħtieġ li jkunu bbażati fuq objettivi ċari u indikaturi ewlenin tal-prestazzjoni biex titkejjel il-kisba ta' dawk l-objettivi. Jenħtieġ li dawn jiġu żviluppati wkoll b'mod inklużiv, kif xieraq, bl-involviment tal-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti bħall-organizzazzjonijiet tan-negozju u tas-soċjetà ċivili, id-dinja akkademika, l-organizzazzjonijiet tar-riċerka, it-trade unions u l-organizzazzjonijiet tal-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tiżviluppa inizjattivi, inkluż ta' natura settorjali, biex tiffaċilita t-tnaqqis tax-xkiel tekniku li jfixkel l-iskambju transfruntier tad-data għall-iżvilupp tal-IA, inkluż dwar l-infrastruttura tal-aċċess għad-data, u l-interoperabbiltà semantika u teknika ta' tipi differenti ta' data.
(165)
The development of AI systems other than high-risk AI systems in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation may lead to a larger uptake of ethical and trustworthy AI in the Union. Providers of AI systems that are not high-risk should be encouraged to create codes of conduct, including related governance mechanisms, intended to foster the voluntary application of some or all of the mandatory requirements applicable to high-risk AI systems, adapted in light of the intended purpose of the systems and the lower risk involved and taking into account the available technical solutions and industry best practices such as model and data cards. Providers and, as appropriate, deployers of all AI systems, high-risk or not, and AI models should also be encouraged to apply on a voluntary basis additional requirements related, for example, to the elements of the Union’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, environmental sustainability, AI literacy measures, inclusive and diverse design and development of AI systems, including attention to vulnerable persons and accessibility to persons with disability, stakeholders’ participation with the involvement, as appropriate, of relevant stakeholders such as business and civil society organisations, academia, research organisations, trade unions and consumer protection organisations in the design and development of AI systems, and diversity of the development teams, including gender balance. To ensure that the voluntary codes of conduct are effective, they should be based on clear objectives and key performance indicators to measure the achievement of those objectives. They should also be developed in an inclusive way, as appropriate, with the involvement of relevant stakeholders such as business and civil society organisations, academia, research organisations, trade unions and consumer protection organisation. The Commission may develop initiatives, including of a sectoral nature, to facilitate the lowering of technical barriers hindering cross-border exchange of data for AI development, including on data access infrastructure, semantic and technical interoperability of different types of data.
(166)
Hu importanti li s-sistemi tal-IA relatati ma' prodotti li mhumiex b'riskju għoli f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, u għalhekk ma għandhomx għalfejn jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti stipulati għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, xorta waħda jkunu sikuri meta jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew meta jitqiegħdu fis-servizz. B'kontribut għal dan l-objettiv, ir-Regolament (UE) 2023/988 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (53) japplika bħala xibka ta' sikurezza.
(166)
It is important that AI systems related to products that are not high-risk in accordance with this Regulation and thus are not required to comply with the requirements set out for high-risk AI systems are nevertheless safe when placed on the market or put into service. To contribute to this objective, Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council (53) would apply as a safety net.
(167)
Sabiex tkun żgurata kooperazzjoni fiduċjuża u kostruttiva tal-awtoritajiet kompetenti fil-livell tal-Unjoni u dak nazzjonali, jenħtieġ li l-partijiet kollha involuti fl-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament jirrispettaw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni u tad-data miksuba fit-twettiq tal-kompiti tagħhom, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew il-liġi nazzjonali. Jenħtieġ li jwettqu l-kompiti u l-attivitajiet tagħhom b'tali mod li jipproteġu, b'mod partikolari, id-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali, l-informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali u s-sigrieti kummerċjali, l-implimentazzjoni effettiva ta' dan ir-Regolament, l-interessi tas-sigurtà pubblika u nazzjonali, l-integrità tal-proċedimenti kriminali u amministrattivi, u l-integrità tal-informazzjoni klassifikata.
(167)
In order to ensure trustful and constructive cooperation of competent authorities on Union and national level, all parties involved in the application of this Regulation should respect the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks, in accordance with Union or national law. They should carry out their tasks and activities in such a manner as to protect, in particular, intellectual property rights, confidential business information and trade secrets, the effective implementation of this Regulation, public and national security interests, the integrity of criminal and administrative proceedings, and the integrity of classified information.
(168)
Għalhekk jenħtieġ li l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament tkun infurzabbli permezz tal-impożizzjoni ta' penali u miżuri ta' infurzar oħra. Jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa kollha biex jiżguraw li d-dispożizzjonijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament jiġu implimentati, inkluż billi jistabbilixxu penali effettivi, proporzjonati u dissważivi għall-ksur tagħhom, u biex jiġi rrispettat il-prinċipju ta' ne bis in idem. Sabiex jissaħħu u jiġu armonizzati l-penali amministrattivi għall-ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li jiġu stabbiliti l-limiti massimi għall-istabbiliment tal-multi amministrattivi għal ċertu ksur speċifiku. Meta jivvalutaw l-ammont tal-multi, jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri, f'kull każ individwali, iqisu ċ-ċirkostanzi rilevanti kollha tas-sitwazzjoni speċifika, b'kunsiderazzjoni xierqa b'mod partikolari għan-natura, il-gravità u d-durata tal-ksur u tal-konsegwenzi tiegħu u għad-daqs tal-fornitur, b'mod partikolari jekk il-fornitur ikun SME jew negozju ġdid. Jenħtieġ li l-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data jkollu s-setgħa jimponi multi fuq l-istituzzjonijiet, l-aġenziji u l-korpi tal-Unjoni li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(168)
Compliance with this Regulation should be enforceable by means of the imposition of penalties and other enforcement measures. Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that the provisions of this Regulation are implemented, including by laying down effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for their infringement, and to respect the ne bis in idem principle. In order to strengthen and harmonise administrative penalties for infringement of this Regulation, the upper limits for setting the administrative fines for certain specific infringements should be laid down. When assessing the amount of the fines, Member States should, in each individual case, take into account all relevant circumstances of the specific situation, with due regard in particular to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences and to the size of the provider, in particular if the provider is an SME, including a start-up. The European Data Protection Supervisor should have the power to impose fines on Union institutions, agencies and bodies falling within the scope of this Regulation.
(169)
Jenħtieġ li l-konformità mal-obbligi fuq il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali imposti skont dan ir-Regolament tkun infurzabbli, fost l-oħrajn, permezz ta' multi. Għal dak l-għan, jenħtieġ li jiġu stabbiliti wkoll livelli xierqa ta' multi għall-ksur ta' dawk l-obbligi, inkluż in-nuqqas ta' konformità mal-miżuri mitluba mill-Kummissjoni f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, soġġett għal perjodi ta' limitazzjoni xierqa f'konformità mal-prinċipju tal-proporzjonalità. Id-deċiżjonijiet kollha meħuda mill-Kummissjoni skont dan ir-Regolament huma soġġetti għal rieżami mill-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea f'konformità mat-TFUE, inkluża l-ġuriżdizzjoni illimitata tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja fir-rigward tal-penali skontl-Artikolu 261 TFUE.
(169)
Compliance with the obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models imposed under this Regulation should be enforceable, inter alia, by means of fines. To that end, appropriate levels of fines should also be laid down for infringement of those obligations, including the failure to comply with measures requested by the Commission in accordance with this Regulation, subject to appropriate limitation periods in accordance with the principle of proportionality. All decisions taken by the Commission under this Regulation are subject to review by the Court of Justice of the European Union in accordance with the TFEU, including the unlimited jurisdiction of the Court of Justice with regard to penalties pursuant to Article 261 TFEU.
(170)
Il-liġi tal-Unjoni u l-liġi nazzjonali diġà jipprovdu rimedji effettivi għall-persuni fiżiċi u ġuridiċi li d-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tagħhom jiġu affettwati b'mod negattiv mill-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA. Mingħajr preġudizzju għal dawk ir-rimedji, jenħtieġ li kwalunkwe persuna fiżika jew ġuridika li jkollha raġunijiet biex tqis li kien hemm ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament tkun intitolata tressaq ilment lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti.
(170)
Union and national law already provide effective remedies to natural and legal persons whose rights and freedoms are adversely affected by the use of AI systems. Without prejudice to those remedies, any natural or legal person that has grounds to consider that there has been an infringement of this Regulation should be entitled to lodge a complaint to the relevant market surveillance authority.
(171)
Jenħtieġ li l-persuni affettwati jkollhom id-dritt li jiksbu spjegazzjoni meta deċiżjoni tal-implimentatur tkun ibbażata prinċipalment fuq l-output minn ċerti sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament u meta dik id-deċiżjoni tipproduċi effetti legali jew taffettwa b'mod sinifikanti b'mod simili lil dawk il-persuni b'mod li jqisu li għandu impatt negattiv fuq is-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew id-drittijiet fundamentali tagħhom. Jenħtieġ li dik l-ispjegazzjoni tkun ċara u sinifikanti u jenħtieġ li tipprovdi bażi li fuqha l-persuni affettwati jkunu jistgħu jeżerċitaw id-drittijiet tagħhom. Jenħtieġ li d-dritt li tinkiseb spjegazzjoni ma japplikax għall-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA li fir-rigward tagħhom joħorġu eċċezzjonijiet jew restrizzjonijiet mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali u jenħtieġ li japplika biss sa fejn dan id-dritt ma jkunx diġà previst fil-liġi tal-Unjoni.
(171)
Affected persons should have the right to obtain an explanation where a deployer’s decision is based mainly upon the output from certain high-risk AI systems that fall within the scope of this Regulation and where that decision produces legal effects or similarly significantly affects those persons in a way that they consider to have an adverse impact on their health, safety or fundamental rights. That explanation should be clear and meaningful and should provide a basis on which the affected persons are able to exercise their rights. The right to obtain an explanation should not apply to the use of AI systems for which exceptions or restrictions follow from Union or national law and should apply only to the extent this right is not already provided for under Union law.
(172)
Jenħtieġ li l-persuni li jaġixxu bħala informaturi dwar il-ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament jiġu protetti skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni. Għalhekk, jenħtieġ li d-Direttiva (UE) 2019/1937 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (54) tapplika għar-rappurtar ta' ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament u għall-protezzjoni tal-persuni li jirrappurtaw tali ksur.
(172)
Persons acting as whistleblowers on the infringements of this Regulation should be protected under the Union law. Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council (54) should therefore apply to the reporting of infringements of this Regulation and the protection of persons reporting such infringements.
(173)
Sabiex ikun żgurat li l-qafas regolatorju jista' jiġi adattat fejn meħtieġ, jenħtieġ li s-setgħa li jiġu adottati atti f'konformità mal-Artikolu 290 TFUE tiġi ddelegata lill-Kummissjoni biex temenda l-kundizzjonijiet li taħthom sistema tal-IA ma titqiesx li tkun ta' riskju għoli, il-lista tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, id-dispożizzjonijiet dwar id-dokumentazzjoni teknika, il-kontenut tad-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE, id-dispożizzjonijiet dwar il-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità, id-dispożizzjonijiet li jistabbilixxu s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li għalihom jenħtieġ tapplika l-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq il-valutazzjoni tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità u fuq il-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika, il-limitu massimu, il-paramentri referenzjarji u l-indikaturi, inkluż billi jiġu ssupplimentati dawk il-paramentri referenzjarji u l-indikaturi fir-regoli għall-klassifikazzjoni ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, il-kriterji għad-deżinjazzjoni ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, id-dokumentazzjoni teknika għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u t-trasparenza tal-informazzjoni għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Hu partikolarment importanti li tul il-ħidma preparatorja tagħha, il-Kummissjoni twettaq konsultazzjonijiet xierqa, inkluż fil-livell ta' esperti, u li dawk il-konsultazzjonijiet isiru f'konformità mal-prinċipji stabbiliti fil-Ftehim Interistituzzjonali tat-13 ta' April 2016 dwar it-Tfassil Aħjar tal-Liġijiet (55). B'mod partikolari, biex tiġi żgurata parteċipazzjoni ugwali fit-tħejjija tal-atti delegati, il-Parlament Ewropew u l-Kunsill jirċievu d-dokumenti kollha fl-istess ħin li jirċevuhom l-esperti tal-Istati Membri, u l-esperti tagħhom sistematikament ikollhom aċċess għal-laqgħat tal-gruppi ta' esperti tal-Kummissjoni li jittrattaw it-tħejjija ta' atti delegati.
(173)
In order to ensure that the regulatory framework can be adapted where necessary, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend the conditions under which an AI system is not to be considered to be high-risk, the list of high-risk AI systems, the provisions regarding technical documentation, the content of the EU declaration of conformity the provisions regarding the conformity assessment procedures, the provisions establishing the high-risk AI systems to which the conformity assessment procedure based on assessment of the quality management system and assessment of the technical documentation should apply, the threshold, benchmarks and indicators, including by supplementing those benchmarks and indicators, in the rules for the classification of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, the criteria for the designation of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, the technical documentation for providers of general-purpose AI models and the transparency information for providers of general-purpose AI models. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making (55). In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
(174)
Minħabba l-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi rapidi u l-kompetenza esperta teknika meħtieġa biex dan ir-Regolament jiġi implimentat b’mod effettiv, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tevalwa u tirrieżamina dan ir-Regolament sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2029 u kull erba' snin minn hemm 'il quddiem u tirrapporta lura lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill. Barra minn hekk, filwaqt li tqis l-implikazzjonijiet għall-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni twettaq valutazzjoni tal-ħtieġa li darba fis-sena jiġu emendati l-lista tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u l-lista ta' prattiki pprojbiti. Barra minn hekk, sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2028 u kull erba' snin wara dan, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tevalwa u tirrapporta lura lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill dwar il-ħtieġa li jiġu emendati l-lista tal-intestaturi ta’ oqsma b'riskju għoli fl-anness ta' dan ir-Regolament, is-sistemi tal-IA fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-obbligi tat-trasparenza, l-effettività tas-sistema tas-superviżjoni u tal-governanza u l-progress fl-iżvilupp ta' strumenti ta' standardizzazzjoni dwar l-iżvilupp effiċjenti fl-użu tal-enerġija ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, inkluż il-ħtieġa għal aktar miżuri jew azzjonijiet. Fl-aħħar nett, sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2028 u kull tliet snin minn hemm 'il quddiem, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tevalwa l-impatt u l-effettività tal-kodiċijiet tal-kondotta volontarji biex trawwem l-applikazzjoni tar-rekwiżiti previsti għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli fil-każ ta' sistemi tal-IA għajr sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u possibbilment rekwiżiti addizzjonali oħra għal tali sistemi tal-IA.
(174)
Given the rapid technological developments and the technical expertise required to effectively apply this Regulation, the Commission should evaluate and review this Regulation by 2 August 2029 and every four years thereafter and report to the European Parliament and the Council. In addition, taking into account the implications for the scope of this Regulation, the Commission should carry out an assessment of the need to amend the list of high-risk AI systems and the list of prohibited practices once a year. Moreover, by 2 August 2028 and every four years thereafter, the Commission should evaluate and report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the need to amend the list of high-risk areas headings in the annex to this Regulation, the AI systems within the scope of the transparency obligations, the effectiveness of the supervision and governance system and the progress on the development of standardisation deliverables on energy efficient development of general-purpose AI models, including the need for further measures or actions. Finally, by 2 August 2028 and every three years thereafter, the Commission should evaluate the impact and effectiveness of voluntary codes of conduct to foster the application of the requirements provided for high-risk AI systems in the case of AI systems other than high-risk AI systems and possibly other additional requirements for such AI systems.
(175)
Sabiex ikunu żgurati kundizzjonijiet uniformi għall-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, jenħtieġ li l-Kummissjoni tingħata setgħat ta' implimentazzjoni. Jenħtieġ li dawk is-setgħat ikunu eżerċitati f'konformità mar-Regolament (UE) Nru 182/2011 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (56).
(175)
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (56).
(176)
Minħabba li l-objettiv ta' dan ir-Regolament, jiġifieri li jtejjeb il-funzjonament tas-suq intern u jippromwovi l-adozzjoni ta' IA ċċentrata fuq il-bniedem u affidabbli, filwaqt li jiżgura livell għoli ta' protezzjoni tas-saħħa, tas-sikurezza u tad-drittijiet fundamentali minquxa fil-Karta, inkluż id-demokrazija, l-istat tad-dritt u l-protezzjoni ambjentali kontra l-effetti ta' ħsara tas-sistemi tal-IA fl-Unjoni u jappoġġa l-innovazzjoni, ma jistax jinkiseb b'mod suffiċjenti mill-Istati Membri u jista' pjuttost, minħabba l-iskala jew l-effetti tal-azzjoni, jinkiseb aħjar fil-livell tal-Unjoni, l-Unjoni tista' tadotta miżuri f'konformità mal-prinċipju ta’ sussidjarjetà kif stabbilit fl-Artikolu 5 TUE. F'konformità mal-prinċipju ta’ proporzjonalità, kif stabbilit f'dak l-Artikolu, dan ir-Regolament ma jmurx lil hinn minn dak meħtieġ sabiex jinkiseb dak l-objettiv.
(176)
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to improve the functioning of the internal market and to promote the uptake of human centric and trustworthy AI, while ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter, including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection against harmful effects of AI systems in the Union and supporting innovation, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(177)
sabiex tiġi żgurata ċ-ċertezza legali, jiġi żgurat perjodu ta' adattament xieraq għall-operaturi u jiġi evitat tfixkil fis-suq, inkluż billi tiġi żgurata l-kontinwità tal-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA, jixraq li dan ir-Regolament japplika għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkunu ġew introdotti fis-suq jew tqiegħdu fis-servizz qabel id-data ġenerali tal-applikazzjoni tagħhom, biss jekk, minn dik id-data, dawk is-sistemi jkunu soġġetti għal bidliet sinifikanti fid-disinn jew fl-għan maħsub tagħhom. Jixraq li jiġi ċċarat li, f'dan ir-rigward, il-kunċett ta' bidla sinifikanti jenħtieġ li jinftiehem bħala ekwivalenti fis-sustanza għall-kunċett ta' modifika sostanzjali, li jintuża biss fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament. Fuq bażi eċċezzjonali u fid-dawl tal-obbligu ta' responsabbiltà pubblika, jenħtieġ li l-operaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA li huma komponenti tas-sistemi tal-IT fuq skala kbira stabbiliti bl-atti legali elenkati f'anness ta' dan ir-Regolament u l-operaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi jieħdu l-passi meħtieġa, rispettivament, biex jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament sa tmiem l-2030 u sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2030.
(177)
In order to ensure legal certainty, ensure an appropriate adaptation period for operators and avoid disruption to the market, including by ensuring continuity of the use of AI systems, it is appropriate that this Regulation applies to the high-risk AI systems that have been placed on the market or put into service before the general date of application thereof, only if, from that date, those systems are subject to significant changes in their design or intended purpose. It is appropriate to clarify that, in this respect, the concept of significant change should be understood as equivalent in substance to the notion of substantial modification, which is used with regard only to high-risk AI systems pursuant to this Regulation. On an exceptional basis and in light of public accountability, operators of AI systems which are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in an annex to this Regulation and operators of high-risk AI systems that are intended to be used by public authorities should, respectively, take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements of this Regulation by end of 2030 and by 2 August 2030.
(178)
Il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli huma mħeġġa biex matul il-perjodu tranżitorju jibdew diġà jikkonformaw, fuq bażi volontarja, mal-obbligi rilevanti ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(178)
Providers of high-risk AI systems are encouraged to start to comply, on a voluntary basis, with the relevant obligations of this Regulation already during the transitional period.
(179)
Jenħtieġ li dan ir-Regolament japplika mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2026. Madankollu, b'kunsiderazzjoni għar-riskju inaċċettabbli assoċjat mal-użu tal-IA b'ċerti modi, jenħtieġ li l-projbizzjonijiet kif ukoll id-dispożizzjonijiet ġenerali ta’ dan ir-Regolament japplikaw diġà mit-2 ta’ Frar 2025. Filwaqt li l-effett sħiħ ta' dawk il-projbizzjonijiet isegwi bl-istabbiliment tal-governanza u l-infurzar ta' dan ir-Regolament, l-antiċipazzjoni tal-applikazzjoni tal-projbizzjonijiet hija importanti biex jitqiesu r-riskji inaċċettabbli u biex ikollha effett fuq proċeduri oħra, bħal fid-dritt ċivili. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-infrastruttura relatata mal-governanza u mas-sistema tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità tkun operattiva qabel it-2 ta’ Awwissu 2026, u għalhekk jenħtieġ li d-dispożizzjonijiet dwar il-korpi notifikati u l-istruttura ta' governanza japplikaw mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025. Minħabba l-pass mgħaġġel tal-avvanzi teknoloġiċi u l-adozzjoni ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, jenħtieġ li l-obbligi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali japplikaw mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025. Jenħtieġ li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jkunu lesti sat-2 ta’ Mejju 2025 bil-ħsieb li l-fornituri jkunu jistgħu juru l-konformità fil-ħin. Jenħtieġ li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jiżgura li r-regoli u l-proċeduri ta' klassifikazzjoni jkunu aġġornati fid-dawl tal-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi. Barra minn hekk, jenħtieġ li l-Istati Membri jistabbilixxu u jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni r-regoli dwar il-penali, inkluż il-multi amministrattivi, u jiżguraw li dawn jiġu implimentati sew u b'mod effettiv sad-data tal-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Għalhekk jenħtieġ li d-dispożizzjonijiet dwar il-penali japplikaw mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025.
(179)
This Regulation should apply from 2 August 2026. However, taking into account the unacceptable risk associated with the use of AI in certain ways, the prohibitions as well as the general provisions of this Regulation should already apply from 2 February 2025. While the full effect of those prohibitions follows with the establishment of the governance and enforcement of this Regulation, anticipating the application of the prohibitions is important to take account of unacceptable risks and to have an effect on other procedures, such as in civil law. Moreover, the infrastructure related to the governance and the conformity assessment system should be operational before 2 August 2026, therefore the provisions on notified bodies and governance structure should apply from 2 August 2025. Given the rapid pace of technological advancements and adoption of general-purpose AI models, obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models should apply from 2 August 2025. Codes of practice should be ready by 2 May 2025 in view of enabling providers to demonstrate compliance on time. The AI Office should ensure that classification rules and procedures are up to date in light of technological developments. In addition, Member States should lay down and notify to the Commission the rules on penalties, including administrative fines, and ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented by the date of application of this Regulation. Therefore the provisions on penalties should apply from 2 August 2025.
(180)
Il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data u l-Bord Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data ġew ikkonsultati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 42(1) u (2) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725 u taw l-opinjoni konġunta tagħhom fit-18 ta' Ġunju 2021,
(180)
The European Data Protection Supervisor and the European Data Protection Board were consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and delivered their joint opinion on 18 June 2021,
ADOTTAW DAN IR-REGOLAMENT:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
KAPITOLU I
CHAPTER I
DISPOŻIZZJONIJIET ĠENERALI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Artikolu 1
Article 1
Suġġett
Subject matter`
1. Dan ir-Regolament għandu l-għan li jtejjeb il-funzjonament tas-suq intern u li jippromwovi l-użu ta' intelliġenza artifiċjali (IA) iċċentrata fuq il-bniedem u affidabbli, filwaqt li jiġi żgurat livell għoli ta' protezzjoni tas-saħħa, tas-sikurezza, tad-drittijiet fundamentali minquxa fil-Karta, inkluż id-demokrazija, l-istat tad-dritt u l-protezzjoni ambjentali, kontra l-effetti ta' ħsara tas-sistemi tal-IA fl-Unjoni u li tiġi appoġġata l-innovazzjoni.
1. The purpose of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market and promote the uptake of human-centric and trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI), while ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter, including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection, against the harmful effects of AI systems in the Union and supporting innovation.
2. Dan ir-Regolament jistabbilixxi:
2. This Regulation lays down:
(a)
regoli armonizzati għall-introduzzjoni fis-suq, għat-tqegħid fis-servizz u għall-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA fl-Unjoni;
(a)
harmonised rules for the placing on the market, the putting into service, and the use of AI systems in the Union;
(b)
projbizzjonijiet ta' ċerti prattiki tal-IA;
(b)
prohibitions of certain AI practices;
(c)
rekwiżiti speċifiċi għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u obbligi għall-operaturi ta' dawn is-sistemi;
(c)
specific requirements for high-risk AI systems and obligations for operators of such systems;
(d)
regoli ta' trasparenza armonizzati għal ċerti sistemi tal-IA;
(d)
harmonised transparency rules for certain AI systems;
(e)
regoli armonizzati għall-introduzzjoni fis-suq ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali;
(e)
harmonised rules for the placing on the market of general-purpose AI models;
(f)
regoli dwar il-monitoraġġ tas-suq, il-governanza tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-infurzar;
(f)
rules on market monitoring, market surveillance, governance and enforcement;
(g)
miżuri b'appoġġ għall-innovazzjoni b'enfasi partikolari fuq l-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda.
(g)
measures to support innovation, with a particular focus on SMEs, including start-ups.
Artikolu 2
Article 2
Kamp ta' applikazzjoni
Scope
1. Dan ir-Regolament japplika għal:
1. This Regulation applies to:
(a)
il-fornituri li jintroduċu fis-suq jew li jqiegħdu fis-servizz sistemi tal-IA jew li jintroduċu fis-suq mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali fl-Unjoni, irrispettivament minn jekk dawk il-fornituri jkunux stabbiliti jew ikunux jinsabu fl-Unjoni jew f'pajjiż terz;
(a)
providers placing on the market or putting into service AI systems or placing on the market general-purpose AI models in the Union, irrespective of whether those providers are established or located within the Union or in a third country;
(b)
l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA li għandhom il-post ta' stabbiliment tagħhom fl-Unjoni jew li jinsabu fiha;
(b)
deployers of AI systems that have their place of establishment or are located within the Union;
(c)
il-fornituri u l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA li għandhom il-post ta' stabbiliment f'pajjiż terz jew li jinsabu f'pajjiż terz, meta l-output prodott mis-sistema tal-IA jintuża fl-Unjoni;
(c)
providers and deployers of AI systems that have their place of establishment or are located in a third country, where the output produced by the AI system is used in the Union;
(d)
l-importaturi u d-distributuri ta' sistemi tal-IA;
(d)
importers and distributors of AI systems;
(e)
il-manifatturi tal-prodotti li jintroduċu fis-suq jew li jqiegħdu fis-servizz sistema tal-IA flimkien mal-prodott tagħhom u taħt isimhom jew bit-trademark tagħhom stess;
(e)
product manufacturers placing on the market or putting into service an AI system together with their product and under their own name or trademark;
(f)
ir-rappreżentanti awtorizzati tal-fornituri, li mhumiex stabbiliti fl-Unjoni;
(f)
authorised representatives of providers, which are not established in the Union;
(g)
il-persuni affettwati li jinsabu fl-Unjoni.
(g)
affected persons that are located in the Union.
2. Għas-sistemi tal-IA klassifikati bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-Artikolu 6(1) relatati ma' prodotti koperti bil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima B tal-Anness I, japplikaw biss l-Artikolu 6(1), l-Artikoli 102 sa 109 u l- Artikolu 112. L-Artikolu 57 japplika biss sa fejn ir-rekwiżiti għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament ikunu ġew integrati f'dik il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni.
2. For AI systems classified as high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 6(1) related to products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section B of Annex I, only Article 6(1), Articles 102 to 109 and Article 112 apply. Article 57 applies only in so far as the requirements for high-risk AI systems under this Regulation have been integrated in that Union harmonisation legislation.
3. Dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għal oqsma barra mill-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tad-dritt tal-Unjoni, u ma għandux, fi kwalunkwe każ, jaffettwa l-kompetenzi tal-Istati Membri fir-rigward tas-sigurtà nazzjonali, irrispettivament mit-tip ta' entità fdata mill-Istati Membri biex twettaq il-kompiti fir-rigward ta' dawk il-kompetenzi.
3. This Regulation does not apply to areas outside the scope of Union law, and shall not, in any event, affect the competences of the Member States concerning national security, regardless of the type of entity entrusted by the Member States with carrying out tasks in relation to those competences.
Dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għal sistemi tal-IA fejn u sakemm jiġu introdotti fis-suq, jitqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jintużaw b'modifika jew mingħajr modifika esklużivament għal fini militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali, irrispettivament mit-tip tal-entità li twettaq dawk l-attivitajiet.
This Regulation does not apply to AI systems where and in so far they are placed on the market, put into service, or used with or without modification exclusively for military, defence or national security purposes, regardless of the type of entity carrying out those activities.
Dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għal sistemi tal-IA li ma jiġux introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz fl-Unjoni, meta l-output jintuża fl-Unjoni esklużivament għal fini militari, ta' difiża jew ta' sigurtà nazzjonali, irrispettivament mit-tip tal-entità li twettaq dawk l-attivitajiet.
This Regulation does not apply to AI systems which are not placed on the market or put into service in the Union, where the output is used in the Union exclusively for military, defence or national security purposes, regardless of the type of entity carrying out those activities.
4. Dan ir-Regolament la japplika għal awtoritajiet pubbliċi f'pajjiż terz u lanqas għal organizzazzjonijiet internazzjonali li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament skont il-paragrafu 1, meta dawk l-awtoritajiet jew l-organizzazzjonijiet jużaw sistemi tal-IA fil-qafas ta' kooperazzjoni jew ftehimiet internazzjonali għall-infurzar tal-liġi u l-kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja mal-Unjoni jew ma' Stat Membru wieħed jew aktar, dment li tali pajjiż terz jew organizzazzjoni internazzjonali tipprovdi salvagwardji adegwati fir-rigward tal-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet fundamentali u l-libertajiet tal-individwi.
4. This Regulation applies neither to public authorities in a third country nor to international organisations falling within the scope of this Regulation pursuant to paragraph 1, where those authorities or organisations use AI systems in the framework of international cooperation or agreements for law enforcement and judicial cooperation with the Union or with one or more Member States, provided that such a third country or international organisation provides adequate safeguards with respect to the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.
5. Dan ir-Regolament ma għandux jaffettwa l-applikazzjoni tad-dispożizzjonijiet dwar ir-responsabbiltà tal-fornituri tas-servizzi intermedjarji kif stipulat fil-Kapitolu II tar-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065.
5. This Regulation shall not affect the application of the provisions on the liability of providers of intermediary services as set out in Chapter II of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065.
6. Dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għal sistemi jew mudelli tal-IA, inkluż l-output tagħhom, speċifikament żviluppati u mqiegħda fis-servizz għall-iskop uniku tar-riċerka u l-iżvilupp xjentifiċi.
6. This Regulation does not apply to AI systems or AI models, including their output, specifically developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development.
7. Il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni ta' data personali, il-privatezza u l-kunfidenzjalità tal-komunikazzjoni tapplika għal data personali pproċessata b'rabta mad-drittijiet u l-obbligi stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament. Dan ir-Regolament ma għandux jaffettwa r-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 jew (UE) 2018/1725 jew id-Direttiva 2002/58/KE jew (UE) 2016/680, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-Artikolu 10(5) u l-Artikolu 59 ta' dan ir-Regolament.
7. Union law on the protection of personal data, privacy and the confidentiality of communications applies to personal data processed in connection with the rights and obligations laid down in this Regulation. This Regulation shall not affect Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or (EU) 2018/1725, or Directive 2002/58/EC or (EU) 2016/680, without prejudice to Article 10(5) and Article 59 of this Regulation.
8. Dan ir-Regolament ma japplika għall-ebda attività ta' riċerka, ittestjar jew żvilupp fir-rigward ta' sistemi tal-IA jew mudelli tal-IA qabel ma jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew jitqiegħdu fis-servizz. Tali attivitajiet għandhom jitwettqu f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni applikabbli. L-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali ma għandux ikun kopert minn dik l-esklużjoni.
8. This Regulation does not apply to any research, testing or development activity regarding AI systems or AI models prior to their being placed on the market or put into service. Such activities shall be conducted in accordance with applicable Union law. Testing in real world conditions shall not be covered by that exclusion.
9. Dan ir-Regolament huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għar-regoli stabbiliti minn atti legali oħra tal-Unjoni relatati mal-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur u s-sikurezza tal-prodotti.
9. This Regulation is without prejudice to the rules laid down by other Union legal acts related to consumer protection and product safety.
10. Dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għall-obbligi ta' implimentaturi li huma persuni fiżiċi li jużaw sistemi tal-IA waqt attività purament personali mhux professjonali.
10. This Regulation does not apply to obligations of deployers who are natural persons using AI systems in the course of a purely personal non-professional activity.
11. Dan ir-Regolament ma jipprekludix lill-Unjoni jew lill-Istati Membri milli jżommu jew jintroduċu liġijiet, regolamenti jew dispożizzjonijiet amministrattivi li huma aktar favorevoli għall-ħaddiema f'termini ta' protezzjoni tad-drittijiet tagħhom fir-rigward tal-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA mill-impjegaturi, jew milli jħeġġu jew jippermettu l-applikazzjoni ta' ftehimiet kollettivi li huma aktar favorevoli għall-ħaddiema.
11. This Regulation does not preclude the Union or Member States from maintaining or introducing laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to workers in terms of protecting their rights in respect of the use of AI systems by employers, or from encouraging or allowing the application of collective agreements which are more favourable to workers.
12. Dan ir-Regolament ma japplikax għas-sistemi tal-IA rilaxxati b'liċenzji liberi u b'sors miftuħ sakemm ma jiġux introdotti fis-suq jew mqiegħda fis-servizz bħala sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jew bħala sistema tal-IA li taqa' taħt l-Artikolu 5 jew 50.
12. This Regulation does not apply to AI systems released under free and open-source licences, unless they are placed on the market or put into service as high-risk AI systems or as an AI system that falls under Article 5 or 50.
Artikolu 3
Article 3
Definizzjonijiet
Definitions
Għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, japplikaw id-definizzjonijiet li ġejjin:
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:
(1)
“sistema tal-IA” tfisser sistema bbażata fuq magna li hija mfassla biex topera b'livelli differenti ta' awtonomija u li tista' turi adattabbiltà wara l-implimentazzjoni, u li, għal objettivi espliċiti jew impliċiti, tinferixxi, mill-input li tirċievi, kif tiġġenera outputs bħal previżjonijiet, kontenut, rakkomandazzjonijiet jew deċiżjonijiet li jistgħu jinfluwenzaw ambjenti fiżiċi jew virtwali;
(1)
‘AI system’ means a machine-based system that is designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy and that may exhibit adaptiveness after deployment, and that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments;
(2)
“riskju” tfisser il-kombinazzjoni tal-probabbiltà li sseħħ ħsara u s-severità ta' dik il-ħsara;
(2)
‘risk’ means the combination of the probability of an occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm;
(3)
“fornitur” tfisser persuna fiżika jew ġuridika, awtorità pubblika, aġenzija jew korp ieħor li jiżviluppa sistema tal-IA jew mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jew li jikkummissjona l-iżvilupp ta' sistema tal-IA jew mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u jintroduċih fis-suq jew iqiegħed is-sistema tal-IA fis-servizz taħt ismu jew bit-trademark tiegħu stess, kemm jekk bi ħlas kif ukoll jekk mingħajr ħlas;
(3)
‘provider’ means a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body that develops an AI system or a general-purpose AI model or that has an AI system or a general-purpose AI model developed and places it on the market or puts the AI system into service under its own name or trademark, whether for payment or free of charge;
(4)
“implimentatur” tfisser persuna fiżika jew ġuridika, awtorità pubblika, aġenzija jew korp ieħor li juża' sistema tal-IA taħt l-awtorità tiegħu stess ħlief meta s-sistema tal-IA tintuża waqt attività personali mhux professjonali;
(4)
‘deployer’ means a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body using an AI system under its authority except where the AI system is used in the course of a personal non-professional activity;
(5)
“rappreżentant awtorizzat” tfisser persuna fiżika jew ġuridika li tkun tinsab jew li hija stabbilita fl-Unjoni li tkun irċeviet u aċċettat mandat bil-miktub mingħand fornitur ta' sistema tal-IA jew ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali biex, rispettivament, teżegwixxi u twettaq f'ismu l-obbligi u l-proċeduri stabbiliti minn dan ir-Regolament;
(5)
‘authorised representative’ means a natural or legal person located or established in the Union who has received and accepted a written mandate from a provider of an AI system or a general-purpose AI model to, respectively, perform and carry out on its behalf the obligations and procedures established by this Regulation;
(6)
“importatur” tfisser persuna fiżika jew ġuridika li tkun tinsab jew li hija stabbilita fl-Unjoni li tintroduċi fis-suq sistema tal-IA li jkollha l-isem jew it-trademark ta' persuna fiżika jew ġuridika stabbilita f'pajjiż terz;
(6)
‘importer’ means a natural or legal person located or established in the Union that places on the market an AI system that bears the name or trademark of a natural or legal person established in a third country;
(7)
“distributur” tfisser persuna fiżika jew ġuridika fil-katina tal-provvista, għajr il-fornitur jew l-importatur, li tqiegħed is-sistema tal-IA disponibbli fis-suq tal-Unjoni;
(7)
‘distributor’ means a natural or legal person in the supply chain, other than the provider or the importer, that makes an AI system available on the Union market;
(8)
“operatur” tfisser fornitur, manifattur tal-prodott, implimentatur, rappreżentant awtorizzat, importatur jew distributur;
(8)
‘operator’ means a provider, product manufacturer, deployer, authorised representative, importer or distributor;
(9)
“introduzzjoni fis-suq” tfisser l-ewwel darba li sistema tal-IA jew mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ssir disponibbli fis-suq tal-Unjoni;
(9)
‘placing on the market’ means the first making available of an AI system or a general-purpose AI model on the Union market;
(10)
“tqegħid għad-dispożizzjoni fis-suq” tfisser il-forniment ta' sistema tal-IA jew ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għad-distribuzzjoni jew għall-użu fis-suq tal-Unjoni waqt attività kummerċjali, kemm jekk bi ħlas kif ukoll jekk mingħajr ħlas;
(10)
‘making available on the market’ means the supply of an AI system or a general-purpose AI model for distribution or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge;
(11)
“tqegħid fis-servizz” tfisser il-forniment ta' sistema tal-IA għall-ewwel użu direttament lill-implimentatur jew għall-użu proprju fl-Unjoni għall-għan maħsub tagħha;
(11)
‘putting into service’ means the supply of an AI system for first use directly to the deployer or for own use in the Union for its intended purpose;
(12)
“għan maħsub” tfisser l-użu li għalih sistema tal-IA tkun maħsuba mill-fornitur, inkluż il-kuntest speċifiku u l-kundizzjonijiet tal-użu, kif speċifikati fl-informazzjoni pprovduta mill-fornitur fl-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu, fil-materjali u fid-dikjarazzjonijiet promozzjonali jew tal-bejgħ, kif ukoll fid-dokumentazzjoni teknika;
(12)
‘intended purpose’ means the use for which an AI system is intended by the provider, including the specific context and conditions of use, as specified in the information supplied by the provider in the instructions for use, promotional or sales materials and statements, as well as in the technical documentation;
(13)
“użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli” tfisser l-użu ta' sistema tal-IA b'mod li ma jkunx f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha, iżda li jista' jirriżulta minn imġiba tal-bniedem jew interazzjoni ma' sistemi oħra, inkluż sistemi oħra tal-IA, raġonevolment prevedibbli;
(13)
‘reasonably foreseeable misuse’ means the use of an AI system in a way that is not in accordance with its intended purpose, but which may result from reasonably foreseeable human behaviour or interaction with other systems, including other AI systems;
(14)
“komponent tas-sikurezza” tfisser komponent ta' prodott jew ta' sistema tal-IA li jaqdi funzjoni tas-sikurezza għal dak il-prodott jew għal dik is-sistema tal-IA, jew li l-falliment jew il-funzjonament ħażin tiegħu jipperikola s-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni jew ta' proprjetà;
(14)
‘safety component’ means a component of a product or of an AI system which fulfils a safety function for that product or AI system, or the failure or malfunctioning of which endangers the health and safety of persons or property;
(15)
“struzzjonijiet għall-użu” tfisser l-informazzjoni pprovduta mill-fornitur biex jinforma lill-implimentatur, b’mod partikolari, dwar l-għan maħsub u l-użu xieraq ta' sistema tal-IA;
(15)
‘instructions for use’ means the information provided by the provider to inform the deployer of, in particular, an AI system’s intended purpose and proper use;
(16)
“sejħa lura ta' sistema tal-IA” tfisser kwalunkwe miżura mmirata lejn il-kisba tar-ritorn lill-fornitur jew it-tneħħija mis-servizz jew id-diżattivazzjoni tal-użu ta' sistema tal-IA mqiegħda għad-dispożizzjoni tal-implimentaturi;
(16)
‘recall of an AI system’ means any measure aiming to achieve the return to the provider or taking out of service or disabling the use of an AI system made available to deployers;
(17)
“irtirar ta' sistema tal-IA” tfisser kwalunkwe miżura maħsuba biex iżżomm sistema tal-IA fil-katina tal-provvista milli ssir disponibbli fis-suq;
(17)
‘withdrawal of an AI system’ means any measure aiming to prevent an AI system in the supply chain being made available on the market;
(18)
“prestazzjoni ta' sistema tal-IA” tfisser il-kapaċità ta' sistema tal-IA li tilħaq l-għan maħsub tagħha;
(18)
‘performance of an AI system’ means the ability of an AI system to achieve its intended purpose;
(19)
“awtorità tan-notifika” tfisser l-awtorità nazzjonali responsabbli għall-istabbiliment u t-twettiq tal-proċeduri meħtieġa għall-valutazzjoni, id-deżinjazzjoni u n-notifika tal-korpi ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità u għall-monitoraġġ tagħhom;
(19)
‘notifying authority’ means the national authority responsible for setting up and carrying out the necessary procedures for the assessment, designation and notification of conformity assessment bodies and for their monitoring;
(20)
“valutazzjoni tal-konformità” tfisser il-proċess biex jintwera jekk ir-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2 relatati ma' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli ġewx issodisfati;
(20)
‘conformity assessment’ means the process of demonstrating whether the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 relating to a high-risk AI system have been fulfilled;
(21)
“korp ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità” tfisser korp li jwettaq attivitajiet ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità ta' parti terza, inkluż l-ittestjar, iċ-ċertifikazzjoni u l-ispezzjoni;
(21)
‘conformity assessment body’ means a body that performs third-party conformity assessment activities, including testing, certification and inspection;
(22)
“korp notifikat” tfisser korp ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità notifikat f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament u ma' leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti oħra tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni;
(22)
‘notified body’ means a conformity assessment body notified in accordance with this Regulation and other relevant Union harmonisation legislation;
(23)
“modifika sostanzjali” tfisser bidla f'sistema tal-IA wara l-introduzzjoni tagħha fis-suq jew it-tqegħid tagħha fis-servizz li ma tkunx prevista jew ippjanata fil-valutazzjoni tal-konformità inizjali li tkun saret mill-fornitur u li b'riżultat tagħha tiġi affettwata l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, jew li tirriżulta f'modifika fl-għan maħsub li għalih tkun ġiet ivvalutata s-sistema tal-IA;
(23)
‘substantial modification’ means a change to an AI system after its placing on the market or putting into service which is not foreseen or planned in the initial conformity assessment carried out by the provider and as a result of which the compliance of the AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 is affected or results in a modification to the intended purpose for which the AI system has been assessed;
(24)
“markatura CE” tfisser marka li permezz tagħha fornitur jindika li sistema tal-IA hi konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2 u ma' leġiżlazzjoni applikabbli oħra tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni, li tipprevedi t-twaħħil tagħha;
(24)
‘CE marking’ means a marking by which a provider indicates that an AI system is in conformity with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 and other applicable Union harmonisation legislation providing for its affixing;
(25)
“sistema ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq” tfisser l-attivitajiet kollha mwettqa mill-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA biex jiġbru u jirrieżaminaw l-esperjenza miksuba mill-użu tas-sistemi tal-IA li jintroduċu fis-suq jew iqiegħdu fis-servizz bl-għan li jidentifikaw xi ħtieġa li japplikaw minnufih azzjoni korrettiva jew preventiva meħtieġa;
(25)
‘post-market monitoring system’ means all activities carried out by providers of AI systems to collect and review experience gained from the use of AI systems they place on the market or put into service for the purpose of identifying any need to immediately apply any necessary corrective or preventive actions;
(26)
“awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq” tfisser l-awtorità nazzjonali li twettaq l-attivitajiet u li tieħu l-miżuri skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020;
(26)
‘market surveillance authority’ means the national authority carrying out the activities and taking the measures pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020;
(27)
“standard armonizzat” tfisser standard Ewropew kif definit fl-Artikolu 2(1), il-punt (c) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012;
(27)
‘harmonised standard’ means a harmonised standard as defined in Article 2(1), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012;
(28)
“speċifikazzjoni komuni” tfisser sett ta' speċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi, kif definit fl-Artikolu 2, il-punt (4) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012, li tipprovdi mezz biex jiġu ssodisfati ċerti rekwiżiti stabbiliti taħt dan ir-Regolament;
(28)
‘common specification’ means a set of technical specifications as defined in Article 2, point (4) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, providing means to comply with certain requirements established under this Regulation;
(29)
“data għat-taħriġ” tfisser data użata għat-taħriġ ta' sistema tal-IA bl-attrezzar tal-parametri tagħha li jistgħu jiġu mgħallma;
(29)
‘training data’ means data used for training an AI system through fitting its learnable parameters;
(30)
“data għall-validazzjoni” tfisser data użata biex tiġi provduta evalwazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA mħarrġa u għall-irfinar tal-parametri tagħha li ma jistgħux jiġu mgħallma u tal-proċess tat-tagħlim tagħha, sabiex, fost affarijiet oħra, jiġi evitat attrezzar insuffiċjenti jew attrezzar żejjed;
(30)
‘validation data’ means data used for providing an evaluation of the trained AI system and for tuning its non-learnable parameters and its learning process in order, inter alia, to prevent underfitting or overfitting;
(31)
“sett ta' data ta' validazzjoni” tfisser sett ta' data separat jew parti mis-sett ta' data dwar it-taħriġ, bħala qsim fissa jew varjabbli;
(31)
‘validation data set’ means a separate data set or part of the training data set, either as a fixed or variable split;
(32)
“data għall-ittestjar” tfisser data użata biex tiġi pprovduta evalwazzjoni indipendenti tas-sistema tal-IA sabiex tiġi kkonfermata l-prestazzjoni mistennija ta' dik is-sistema qabel ma tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz;
(32)
‘testing data’ means data used for providing an independent evaluation of the AI system in order to confirm the expected performance of that system before its placing on the market or putting into service;
(33)
“data tal-input” tfisser data pprovduta lil sistema tal-IA jew akkwistata direttament minnha li, abbażi tagħha, is-sistema tipproduċi output;
(33)
‘input data’ means data provided to or directly acquired by an AI system on the basis of which the system produces an output;
(34)
“data bijometrika” tfisser data personali li tirriżulta mill-ipproċessar tekniku speċifiku relatat mal-karatteristiċi fiżiċi, fiżjoloġiċi jew komportamentali ta' persuna fiżika, bħal immaġnijiet tal-wiċċ jew data dattiloskopika;
(34)
‘biometric data’ means personal data resulting from specific technical processing relating to the physical, physiological or behavioural characteristics of a natural person, such as facial images or dactyloscopic data;
(35)
“identifikazzjoni bijometrika” tfisser ir-rikonoxximent awtomatizzat ta' karatteristiċi fiżiċi, fiżjoloġiċi, komportamentali jew psikoloġiċi tal-bniedem għall-fini li tiġi stabbilita l-identità ta' persuna fiżika permezz tat-tqabbil tad-data bijometrika ta' dak l-individwu mad-data bijometrika ta' individwi maħżuna f'bażi tad-data;
(35)
‘biometric identification’ means the automated recognition of physical, physiological, behavioural, or psychological human features for the purpose of establishing the identity of a natural person by comparing biometric data of that individual to biometric data of individuals stored in a database;
(36)
“verifika bijometrika” tfisser il-verifika awtomatizzata, “one-to-one”, inkluż l-awtentikazzjoni, tal-identità tal-persuni fiżiċi permezz tat-tqabbil tad-data bijometrika tagħhom mad-data bijometrika pprovduta preċedentement;
(36)
‘biometric verification’ means the automated, one-to-one verification, including authentication, of the identity of natural persons by comparing their biometric data to previously provided biometric data;
(37)
“kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali” tfisser il-kategoriji ta' data personali msemmija fl-Artikolu 9(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, l-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 u l-Artikolu 10(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725;
(37)
‘special categories of personal data’ means the categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 and Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725;
(38)
“data operazzjonali sensittiva” tfisser data operazzjonali relatata ma' attivitajiet ta' prevenzjoni, kxif, investigazzjoni jew prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali, li d-divulgazzjoni tagħha tista' tipperikola l-integrità tal-proċedimenti kriminali;
(38)
‘sensitive operational data’ means operational data related to activities of prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences, the disclosure of which could jeopardise the integrity of criminal proceedings;
(39)
“sistema ta' rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet” tfisser sistema tal-IA għall-fini tal-identifikazzjoni jew tal-inferiment tal-emozzjonijiet jew tal-intenzjonijiet ta' persuni fiżiċi abbażi tad-data bijometrika tagħhom;
(39)
‘emotion recognition system’ means an AI system for the purpose of identifying or inferring emotions or intentions of natural persons on the basis of their biometric data;
(40)
“sistema ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika” tfisser sistema tal-IA bil-għan li persuni fiżiċi jiġu assenjati f'kategoriji speċifiċi abbażi tad-data bijometrika tagħhom, dment li ma tkunx anċillari għal servizz kummerċjali ieħor u strettament meħtieġa għal raġunijiet tekniċi oġġettivi;
(40)
‘biometric categorisation system’ means an AI system for the purpose of assigning natural persons to specific categories on the basis of their biometric data, unless it is ancillary to another commercial service and strictly necessary for objective technical reasons;
(41)
“sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota” tfisser sistema tal-IA għall-fini tal-identifikazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi, mingħajr l-involviment attiv tagħhom, tipikament mill-bogħod permezz tat-tqabbil tad-data bijometrika ta' persuna mad-data bijometrika li tkun tinsab f'bażi ta' data ta' referenza;
(41)
‘remote biometric identification system’ means an AI system for the purpose of identifying natural persons, without their active involvement, typically at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database;
(42)
“sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota ‘fil-ħin reali’” tfisser sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota, li biha l-qbid tad-data bijometrika, it-tqabbil u l-identifikazzjoni kollha jseħħu mingħajr dewmien sinifikanti, li tinkludi mhux biss identifikazzjoni istantanja, iżda wkoll dewmien qasir limitat sabiex tiġi evitata ċ-ċirkomvenzjoni;
(42)
‘real-time remote biometric identification system’ means a remote biometric identification system, whereby the capturing of biometric data, the comparison and the identification all occur without a significant delay, comprising not only instant identification, but also limited short delays in order to avoid circumvention;
(43)
“sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota ‘f'ħin aktar tard’” tfisser sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota minbarra sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali”;
(43)
‘post-remote biometric identification system’ means a remote biometric identification system other than a real-time remote biometric identification system;
(44)
“spazju aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku” tfisser kwalunkwe post fiżiku bi sjieda pubblika jew privata aċċessibbli għal għadd indeterminat ta' persuni fiżiċi, irrispettivament minn jekk japplikawx ċerti kundizzjonijiet għall-aċċess, u irrispettivament mir-restrizzjonijiet potenzjali fuq il-kapaċità;
(44)
‘publicly accessible space’ means any publicly or privately owned physical place accessible to an undetermined number of natural persons, regardless of whether certain conditions for access may apply, and regardless of the potential capacity restrictions;
(45)
“awtorità tal-infurzar tal-liġi” tfisser:
(45)
‘law enforcement authority’ means:
(a)
kwalunkwe awtorità pubblika kompetenti għall-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni, il-kxif jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali jew għall-eżekuzzjoni ta' pieni kriminali, inkluż is-salvagwardja kontra u l-prevenzjoni ta' theddidiet għas-sigurtà pubblika; jew
(a)
any public authority competent for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security; or
(b)
kwalunkwe korp jew entità oħra fdata bil-liġi ta' Stat Membru biex teżerċita awtorità pubblika u setgħat pubbliċi għall-finijiet tal-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni, il-kxif jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali jew tal-eżekuzzjoni ta' pieni kriminali, inkluż is-salvagwardja kontra u l-prevenzjoni ta' theddidiet għas-sigurtà pubblika;
(b)
any other body or entity entrusted by Member State law to exercise public authority and public powers for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security;
(46)
“infurzar tal-liġi” tfisser attivitajiet imwettqa mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom għall-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni, il-kxif jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali jew għall-eżekuzzjoni ta' pieni kriminali, inkluż is-salvagwardja kontra u l-prevenzjoni ta' theddidiet għas-sigurtà pubblika;
(46)
‘law enforcement’ means activities carried out by law enforcement authorities or on their behalf for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including safeguarding against and preventing threats to public security;
(47)
“Uffiċċju għall-IA” tfisser il-funzjoni tal-Kummissjoni li tikkontribwixxi għall-implimentazzjoni, il-monitoraġġ u s-superviżjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA u tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, u l-governanza tal-IA, prevista fid-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni tal-24 ta’ Jannar 2024; ir-referenzi f'dan ir-Regolament għall-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandhom jinftiehmu bħala referenzi għall-Kummissjoni;
(47)
‘AI Office’ means the Commission’s function of contributing to the implementation, monitoring and supervision of AI systems and general-purpose AI models, and AI governance, provided for in Commission Decision of 24 January 2024; references in this Regulation to the AI Office shall be construed as references to the Commission;
(48)
“awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti” tfisser awtorità tan-notifika jew awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq; fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA mqiegħda fis-servizz jew użati mill-istituzzjonijiet, l-aġenziji, l-uffiċċji u l-korpi tal-Unjoni, ir-referenzi għall-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jew għall-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq f'dan ir-Regolament għandhom jitqiesu bħala refernzai għall-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data;
(48)
‘national competent authority’ means a notifying authority or a market surveillance authority; as regards AI systems put into service or used by Union institutions, agencies, offices and bodies, references to national competent authorities or market surveillance authorities in this Regulation shall be construed as references to the European Data Protection Supervisor;
(49)
“inċident serju” tfisser inċident jew ħsara ta' sistema tal-IA li direttament jew indirettament twassal għal wieħed jew waħda minn dawn:
(49)
‘serious incident’ means an incident or malfunctioning of an AI system that directly or indirectly leads to any of the following:
(a)
il-mewt ta' persuna jew ħsara serja għas-saħħa ta' persuna;
(a)
the death of a person, or serious harm to a person’s health;
(b)
tfixkil serju u irriversibbli fil-ġestjoni jew it-tħaddim ta' infrastruttura kritika.
(b)
a serious and irreversible disruption of the management or operation of critical infrastructure;
(c)
il-ksur ta' obbligi skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni maħsuba biex jipproteġu d-drittijiet fundamentali;
(c)
the infringement of obligations under Union law intended to protect fundamental rights;
(d)
ħsara serja lil proprjetà jew lill-ambjent;
(d)
serious harm to property or the environment;
(50)
“data personali” tfisser data kif definit fl-Artikolu 4, il-punt (1), tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679;
(50)
‘personal data’ means personal data as defined in Article 4, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
(51)
“data mhux personali” tfisser data li mhijiex data personali, kif definita fl-Artikolu 4, punt (1) tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679;
(51)
‘non-personal data’ means data other than personal data as defined in Article 4, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
(52)
“tfassil tal-profil” tfisser it-tfassil tal-profil kif definit fl-Artikolu 4, il-punt (4), tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679;
(52)
‘profiling’ means profiling as defined in Article 4, point (4), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
(53)
“pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali” tfisser dokument li jiddeskrivi l-objettivi, il-metodoloġija, l-ambitu ġeografiku, tal-popolazzjoni u dak temporali, il-monitoraġġ, l-organizzazzjoni u t-twettiq tal-ittestjar f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
(53)
‘real-world testing plan’ means a document that describes the objectives, methodology, geographical, population and temporal scope, monitoring, organisation and conduct of testing in real-world conditions;
(54)
“pjan tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni” tfisser dokument maqbul bejn il-fornitur parteċipanti u l-awtorità kompetenti li jiddeskrivi l-objettivi, il-kundizzjonijiet, il-perjodu ta' żmien, il-metodoloġija u r-rekwiżiti għall-attivitajiet imwettqa fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni;
(54)
‘sandbox plan’ means a document agreed between the participating provider and the competent authority describing the objectives, conditions, timeframe, methodology and requirements for the activities carried out within the sandbox;
(55)
“ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA” tfisser qafas ikontrollat stabbilit minn awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti li joffri lill-fornituri jew lil fornituri prospettivi ta' sistemi tal-IA l-possibbiltà li jiżviluppaw, iħarrġu, jivvalidaw u jittestjaw, meta xieraq fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali, sistema innovattiva tal-IA, skont pjan ta' esperimentazzjoni għal żmien limitat taħt superviżjoni regolatorja;
(55)
‘AI regulatory sandbox’ means a controlled framework set up by a competent authority which offers providers or prospective providers of AI systems the possibility to develop, train, validate and test, where appropriate in real-world conditions, an innovative AI system, pursuant to a sandbox plan for a limited time under regulatory supervision;
(56)
“litteriżmu fl-IA” tfisser ħiliet, għarfien u fehim li jippermetti lill-fornituri, lill-implimentaturi u lill-persuni affettwati, b'kunsiderazzjoni għad-drittijiet u l-obbligi rispettivi tagħhom fil-kuntest ta' dan ir-Regolament, jagħmlu użu infurmat tas-sistemi tal-IA, kif ukoll jsiru konxji tal-opportunitajiet u r-riskji tal-IA u l-ħsara possibbli li tista' tikkawża;
(56)
‘AI literacy’ means skills, knowledge and understanding that allow providers, deployers and affected persons, taking into account their respective rights and obligations in the context of this Regulation, to make an informed deployment of AI systems, as well as to gain awareness about the opportunities and risks of AI and possible harm it can cause;
(57)
“ittestjar f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali” tfisser l-ittestjar temporanju ta' sistema tal-IA għall-għan maħsub tagħha f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali barra minn laboratorju jew ambjent simulat b'xi mod ieħor, bil-ħsieb li tinġabar data affidabbli u robusta u biex tiġi vvalutata u vverifikata l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament u ma jikkwalifikax bħala li qed jintroduċi s-sistema tal-IA fis-suq jew fis-servizz skont it-tifsira ta' dan ir-Regolament, dment li jiġu ssodisfati l-kundizzjonijiet kollha stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 57 jew 60;
(57)
‘testing in real-world conditions’ means the temporary testing of an AI system for its intended purpose in real-world conditions outside a laboratory or otherwise simulated environment, with a view to gathering reliable and robust data and to assessing and verifying the conformity of the AI system with the requirements of this Regulation and it does not qualify as placing the AI system on the market or putting it into service within the meaning of this Regulation, provided that all the conditions laid down in Article 57 or 60 are fulfilled;
(58)
“suġġett” għall-fini tal-ittestjar fid-dinja reali tfisser persuna fiżika li tieħu sehem fl-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
(58)
‘subject’, for the purpose of real-world testing, means a natural person who participates in testing in real-world conditions;
(59)
“kunsens infurmat” tfisser l-espressjoni mogħtija liberament, speċifika, mhux ambigwa u volontarja ta' suġġett tar-rieda tiegħu li jieħu sehem f'ittestjar partikolari fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali, wara li jkun ġie infurmat dwar l-aspetti kollha tal-ittestjar li huma rilevanti għad-deċiżjoni tas-suġġett li jieħu sehem;
(59)
‘informed consent’ means a subject’s freely given, specific, unambiguous and voluntary expression of his or her willingness to participate in a particular testing in real-world conditions, after having been informed of all aspects of the testing that are relevant to the subject’s decision to participate;
(60)
“deepfake” tfisser immaġni, kontenut awdjo jew vidjo ġġenerat jew manipulat minn IA li jixbah lil persuni, oġġetti, postijiet, entitajiet jew avvenimenti oħra li jeżistu u li jidher li huwa awtentiku u veritier għall-persuna li tarah;
(60)
‘deep fake’ means AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video content that resembles existing persons, objects, places, entities or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic or truthful;
(61)
“ksur mifrux” tfisser kwalunkwe att jew ommissjoni li jmur kontra d-dritt tal-Unjoni li jipproteġi l-interessi tal-individwi, li:
(61)
‘widespread infringement’ means any act or omission contrary to Union law protecting the interest of individuals, which:
(a)
ikun għamel ħsara jew li x'aktarx ser jagħmel ħsara lill-interessi kollettivi tal-individwi residenti f'mill-inqas żewġ Stat Membri minbarra l-Istat Membru, fejn:
(a)
has harmed or is likely to harm the collective interests of individuals residing in at least two Member States other than the Member State in which:
(i)
oriġina jew seħħ l-att jew l-ommissjoni;
(i)
the act or omission originated or took place;
(ii)
jinsab jew huwa stabbilit il-fornitur ikkonċernat, jew, meta applikabbli, ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu; jew
(ii)
the provider concerned, or, where applicable, its authorised representative is located or established; or
(iii)
huwa stabbilit l-implimentatur, meta l-ksur jitwettaq mill-implimentatur;
(iii)
the deployer is established, when the infringement is committed by the deployer;
(b)
ikun ikkawża, jikkawża jew x'aktarx ser jikkawża ħsara lill-interessi kollettivi tal-individwi u għandu karatteristiċi komuni, inkluż l-istess prattika illegali, qed jikser l-istess interess u qed iseħħ fl-istess ħin, imwettaq mill-istess operatur, f'mill-inqas tliet Stati Membri;
(b)
has caused, causes or is likely to cause harm to the collective interests of individuals and has common features, including the same unlawful practice or the same interest being infringed, and is occurring concurrently, committed by the same operator, in at least three Member States;
(62)
“infrastruttura kritika” tfisser infrastruttura kritika kif definita fl-Artikolu 2, il-punt (4), tad-Direttiva (UE) 2022/2557;
(62)
‘critical infrastructure’ means critical infrastructure as defined in Article 2, point (4), of Directive (EU) 2022/2557;
(63)
“mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali” tfisser mudell tal-IA, inkluż meta tali mudell tal-IA jitħarreġ b'ammont kbir ta' data bl-użu ta' awtosuperviżjoni fuq skala kbira, li juri ġeneralità sinifikanti u li jkun kapaċi jwettaq b'mod kompetenti firxa wiesgħa ta' kompiti distinti rrispettivament mill-mod kif il-mudell jiġi introdott fis-suq u li jista' jiġi integrat f'varjetà ta' sistemi jew applikazzjonijiet downstream, ħlief mudelli tal-IA li jintużaw għal attivitajiet ta' riċerka, żvilupp jew prototipar qabel ma jiġu introdotti fis-suq;
(63)
‘general-purpose AI model’ means an AI model, including where such an AI model is trained with a large amount of data using self-supervision at scale, that displays significant generality and is capable of competently performing a wide range of distinct tasks regardless of the way the model is placed on the market and that can be integrated into a variety of downstream systems or applications, except AI models that are used for research, development or prototyping activities before they are placed on the market;
(64)
“kapaċitajiet b'impatt kbir” tfisser kapaċitajiet li jaqblu mal-kapaċitajiet irreġistrati fl-aktar mudelli avvanzati tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jew jaqbżuhom;
(64)
‘high-impact capabilities’ means capabilities that match or exceed the capabilities recorded in the most advanced general-purpose AI models;
(65)
“riskju sistemiku” tfisser riskju li huwa speċifiku għall-kapaċitajiet b'impatt kbir tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, li jkollu impatt sinifikanti fuq is-suq tal-Unjoni minħabba l-firxa tiegħu, jew minħabba effetti negattivi reali jew raġonevolment prevedibbli fuq is-saħħa pubblika, is-sikurezza, is-sigurtà pubblika, id-drittijiet fundamentali jew is-soċjetà inġenerali, li jista' jiġi propogat fuq skala kbira tul il-katina tal-valur;
(65)
‘systemic risk’ means a risk that is specific to the high-impact capabilities of general-purpose AI models, having a significant impact on the Union market due to their reach, or due to actual or reasonably foreseeable negative effects on public health, safety, public security, fundamental rights, or the society as a whole, that can be propagated at scale across the value chain;
(66)
“sistema tal-IA bi skop ġenerali” tfisser sistema tal-IA li hija bbażata fuq mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u li għandha l-kapaċità li taqdi varjetà ta' skopijiet, kemm għall-użu dirett kif ukoll għall-integrazzjoni f'sistemi tal-IA oħra;
(66)
‘general-purpose AI system’ means an AI system which is based on a general-purpose AI model and which has the capability to serve a variety of purposes, both for direct use as well as for integration in other AI systems;
(67)
“operazzjoni b'punt varjabbli” tfisser kwalunkwe operazzjoni jew assenjazzjoni matematika li tinvolvi numri b'punt varjabbli, li huma subsett tan-numri reali tipikament rappreżentati fuq il-kompjuters minn numru sħiħ ta' preċiżjoni fissa skalat minn esponent ta' numru sħiħ ta' bażi fissa;
(67)
‘floating-point operation’ means any mathematical operation or assignment involving floating-point numbers, which are a subset of the real numbers typically represented on computers by an integer of fixed precision scaled by an integer exponent of a fixed base;
(68)
“fornitur downstream” tfisser fornitur ta' sistema tal-IA, inkluż sistema tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, li tintegra mudell tal-IA, irrispettivament minn jekk il-mudell tal-IA jkunx provdut minnu stess u integrat vertikalment jew provdut minn entità oħra abbażi ta' relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali.
(68)
‘downstream provider’ means a provider of an AI system, including a general-purpose AI system, which integrates an AI model, regardless of whether the AI model is provided by themselves and vertically integrated or provided by another entity based on contractual relations.
Artikolu 4
Article 4
Litteriżmu fl-IA
AI literacy
Il-fornituri u l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA għandhom jieħdu miżuri biex jiżguraw, sa fejn jistgħu, li l-persunal tagħhom u persuni oħra li jkollhom x'jaqsmu mat-tħaddim u l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA f'isimhom ikollhom livell suffiċjenti ta' litteriżmu fl-IA, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-għarfien, l-esperjenza, l-edukazzjoni u t-taħriġ tekniku tagħhom u l-kuntest li fih ikunu ser jintużaw is-sistemi tal-IA, u b'kunsiderazzjoni għall-persuni jew il-gruppi ta' persuni li s-sistemi tal-IA jkunu ser jintużaw fuqhom.
Providers and deployers of AI systems shall take measures to ensure, to their best extent, a sufficient level of AI literacy of their staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf, taking into account their technical knowledge, experience, education and training and the context the AI systems are to be used in, and considering the persons or groups of persons on whom the AI systems are to be used.
KAPITOLU II
CHAPTER II
PRATTIKI PPROJBITI TAL-IA
PROHIBITED AI PRACTICES
Artikolu 5
Article 5
Prattiki tal-IA pprojbiti
Prohibited AI practices
1. Il-prattiki tal-IA li ġejjin għandhom ikunu pprojbiti:
1. The following AI practices shall be prohibited:
(a)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz jew l-użu ta' sistema tal-IA li tuża tekniki subliminali li persuna ma tkunx konxja tagħhom jew tekniki intenzjonalment manipulattivi jew qarrieqa, bil-għan jew bir-riżultat li materjalment ifixklu l-imġiba ta' persuna jew ta' grupp ta' persuni billi jdgħajfu b'mod sinifikanti l-abbiltà tagħha li tieħu deċiżjoni infurmata, u minħabba f'hekk huma jieħdudeċiżjoni li kieku ma kinux jieħdu b'mod li jikkawża jew li aktarx raġonevolament jikkawża ħsara sinifikanti lil dik il-persuna, lil persuna oħra jew lil grupp ta' persuni;
(a)
the placing on the market, the putting into service or the use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness or purposefully manipulative or deceptive techniques, with the objective, or the effect of materially distorting the behaviour of a person or a group of persons by appreciably impairing their ability to make an informed decision, thereby causing them to take a decision that they would not have otherwise taken in a manner that causes or is reasonably likely to cause that person, another person or group of persons significant harm;
(b)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz jew l-użu ta' sistema tal-IA li tisfrutta kwalunkwe waħda mill-vulnerabbiltajiet ta' persuna fiżika jew ta' grupp speċifiku ta' persuni minħabba l-età, diżabbiltà jew sitwazzjoni soċjali jew ekonomika speċifika, bl-għan jew bir-riżultat li tfixkel materjalment l-imġiba ta' dik il-persuna jew ta' persuna li tappartjeni għal dak il-grupp b'mod li jikkawża jew li raġonevolment aktarx jikkawża ħsara sinifikanti lil dik il-persuna jew lil persuna oħra;
(b)
the placing on the market, the putting into service or the use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of a natural person or a specific group of persons due to their age, disability or a specific social or economic situation, with the objective, or the effect, of materially distorting the behaviour of that person or a person belonging to that group in a manner that causes or is reasonably likely to cause that person or another person significant harm;
(c)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz jew l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA għall-evalwazzjoni jew il-klassifikazzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi jew gruppi ta' persuni tul ċertu perjodu ta' żmien abbażi tal-imġiba soċjali tagħhom jew ta' karatteristiċi personali jew tal-personalità magħrufa, inferiti jew previsti, fejn il-punteġġ għaċ-ċittadini jwassal għal wieħed minn dawn li ġejjin jew għat-tnejn li huma:
(c)
the placing on the market, the putting into service or the use of AI systems for the evaluation or classification of natural persons or groups of persons over a certain period of time based on their social behaviour or known, inferred or predicted personal or personality characteristics, with the social score leading to either or both of the following:
(i)
trattament detrimentali jew mhux favorevoli ta' ċerti persuni fiżiċi jew ta' gruppi ta' persuni f'kuntesti soċjali li mhumiex relatati mal-kuntesti li fihom id-data kienet oriġinarjament iġġenerata jew miġbura;
(i)
detrimental or unfavourable treatment of certain natural persons or groups of persons in social contexts that are unrelated to the contexts in which the data was originally generated or collected;
(ii)
trattament detrimentali jew mhux favorevoli ta' ċerti persuni fiżiċi jew ta' gruppi ta' persuni li ma jkunx ġustifikat jew li jkun sproporzjonat għall-imġiba soċjali tagħhom jew għall-gravità tagħha;
(ii)
detrimental or unfavourable treatment of certain natural persons or groups of persons that is unjustified or disproportionate to their social behaviour or its gravity;
(d)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz għal dan l-għan speċifiku, jew l-użu ta' sistema tal-IA biex isiru valutazzjonijiet tar-riskju ta' persuni fiżiċi sabiex jiġi vvalutat jew imbassar ir-riskju li persuna fiżika twettaq reat kriminali, abbażi biss tat-tfassil ta' profil ta' persuna fiżika jew fuq il-valutazzjoni tal-karatteristiċi tal-personalità tagħha; din il-projbizzjoni ma għandhiex tapplika għas-sistemi tal-IA użati biex jappoġġaw il-valutazzjoni mill-bniedem tal-involviment ta' persuna f'attività kriminali, li diġà hija bbażata fuq fatti oġġettivi u verifikabbli marbuta direttament ma' attività kriminali;
(d)
the placing on the market, the putting into service for this specific purpose, or the use of an AI system for making risk assessments of natural persons in order to assess or predict the risk of a natural person committing a criminal offence, based solely on the profiling of a natural person or on assessing their personality traits and characteristics; this prohibition shall not apply to AI systems used to support the human assessment of the involvement of a person in a criminal activity, which is already based on objective and verifiable facts directly linked to a criminal activity;
(e)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz għal dan l-għan speċifiku, jew l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA li joħolqu jew jespandu l-bażijiet tad-data tar-rikonoxximent tal-wiċċ permezz ta' scraping mhux immirat tal-immaġnijiet tal-wiċċ mill-internet jew minn filmati tas-CCTV;
(e)
the placing on the market, the putting into service for this specific purpose, or the use of AI systems that create or expand facial recognition databases through the untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage;
(f)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz għal dan l-għan speċifiku, jew l-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA biex jiġu inferiti l-emozzjonijiet ta' persuna fiżika fl-oqsma tal-post tax-xogħol u tal-istituzzjonijiet edukattivi ħlief fejn l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA jkun maħsub biex tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew mqiegħda fis-servizz għal raġunijiet mediċi jew ta' sikurezza;
(f)
the placing on the market, the putting into service for this specific purpose, or the use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions, except where the use of the AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons;
(g)
l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz għal dan l-iskop speċifiku, jew l-użu ta' sistemi ta' kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika li jikkategorizzaw individwalment lill-persuni fiżiċi abbażi tad-data bijometrika tagħhom biex jiddeduċu jew jinferixxu r-razza, l-opinjonijiet politiċi, is-sħubija fi trade union, it-twemmin reliġjuż jew filosofiku, il-ħajja sesswali jew l-orjentazzjoni sesswali tagħhom; din il-projbizzjoni ma tkopri l-ebda tikkettar jew iffiltrar ta' settijiet tad-data bijometrika miksuba legalment, bħal immaġnijiet, ibbażati fuq data bijometrika jew kategorizzazzjoni ta' data bijometrika fil-qasam tal-infurzar tal-liġi;
(g)
the placing on the market, the putting into service for this specific purpose, or the use of biometric categorisation systems that categorise individually natural persons based on their biometric data to deduce or infer their race, political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life or sexual orientation; this prohibition does not cover any labelling or filtering of lawfully acquired biometric datasets, such as images, based on biometric data or categorizing of biometric data in the area of law enforcement;
(h)
l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” f'żoni aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, dment li u sakemm dan l-użu jkun strettament meħtieġ għal wieħed mill-objettivi li ġejjin:
(h)
the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement, unless and in so far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
(i)
it-tfittxija mmirata għal vittmi speċifiċi ta' ħtif, traffikar ta' bnedmin jew sfruttament sesswali ta' bnedmin kif ukoll it-tfittxija għal persuni neqsin;
(i)
the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii)
il-prevenzjoni ta' theddida speċifika, sostanzjali u imminenti għall-ħajja jew għas-sikurezza fiżika ta' persuni fiżiċi jew theddida ġenwina u preżenti jew ġenwina u prevedibbli ta' attakk terroristiku;
(ii)
the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii)
il-lokalizzazzjoni jew l-identifikazzjoni ta' persuna suspettata li wettqet reat kriminali, għall-fini tat-twettiq ta' investigazzjoni kriminali jew il-prosekuzzjoni jew l-eżekuzzjoni ta' piena kriminali għal reati, imsemmija fl-Anness II u punibbli fl-Istat Membru kkonċernat b'sentenza ta' kustodja jew ordni ta' detenzjoni għal perjodu massimu ta' mill-inqas erba' snin.
(iii)
the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years.
Il-punt (h) tal-ewwel subparagrafu huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għall-Artikolu 9 tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 għall-ipproċessar ta' data bijometrika għal finijiet oħra għajr l-infurzar tal-liġi.
Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
2. L-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi għal kwalunkwe wieħed mill-objettivi msemmija fil-paragrafu 1, l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h) għandu jiġi implimentat għall-finijiet stipulati f’ dak biss biex tiġi kkonfermata l-identità tal-individwu speċifikament taħt mira u għandu jqis l-elementi li ġejjin:
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a)
in-natura tas-sitwazzjoni li twassal għall-użu possibbli, b'mod partikolari s-serjetà, il-probabbiltà u l-iskala tal-ħsara li kienet tiġi kkawżata kieku s-sistema ma ntużatx;
(a)
the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b)
il-konsegwenzi tal-użu tas-sistema għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tal-persuni kollha kkonċernati, b'mod partikolari s-serjetà, il-probabbiltà u l-iskala ta' dawk il-konsegwenzi.
(b)
the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences.
Barra minn hekk, l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi għal kwalunkwe wieħed mill-objettivi msemmija fil-paragrafu 1, l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h) ta' dan l-Artikolu għandu jikkonforma mas-salvagwardji u l-kundizzjonijiet meħtieġa u proporzjonati fir-rigward tal-użu f'konformità mal-liġi nazzjonali li tawtorizza l-użu tagħhom, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-limitazzjonijiet temporali, ġeografiċi u personali. L-użu tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għandu jiġi awtorizzat biss jekk l-awtorità tal-infurzar tal-liġi tkun lestiet valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali kif previst fl-Artikolu 27 u tkun irreġistrat is-sistema fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE skont l-Artikolu 49. Madankollu, f'każijiet ta' urġenza debitament ġustifikati, l-użu ta' tali sistemi jista' jinbeda mingħajr ir-reġistrazzjoni fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE, dment li tali reġistrazzjoni titlesta mingħajr dewmien żejjed.
In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations. The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
3. Għall-finijiet tal-paragrafu 1, l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h) u l-paragrafu 2, kull użu għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi ta' sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għandu jkun soġġett għal awtorizzazzjoni minn qabel mogħtija minn awtorità ġudizzjarja jew awtorità amministrattiva indipendenti li d-deċiżjoni tagħha hija vinkolanti tal-Istat Membru li fih ser isir l-użu, maħruġa wara talba motivata u f'konformità mar-regoli dettaljati tal-liġi nazzjonali msemmija fil-paragrafu 5. Madankollu, f'sitwazzjoni ta' urġenza debitament ġustifikata, l-użu ta' tali sistema jista' jinbeda mingħajr awtorizzazzjoni dment li dik l-awtorizzazzjoni tintalab mingħajr dewmien żejjed, sa mhux aktar tard minn 24 siegħa wara. Jekk tali awtorizzazzjoni tiġi rrifjutata, l-użu għandu jitwaqqaf b'effett immedjat u d-data kollha, kif ukoll ir-riżultati u l-outputs ta' dak l-użu għandhom jiġu skartati u mħassra minnufih.
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h) and paragraph 2, each use for the purposes of law enforcement of a ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be subject to a prior authorisation granted by a judicial authority or an independent administrative authority whose decision is binding of the Member State in which the use is to take place, issued upon a reasoned request and in accordance with the detailed rules of national law referred to in paragraph 5. However, in a duly justified situation of urgency, the use of such system may be commenced without an authorisation provided that such authorisation is requested without undue delay, at the latest within 24 hours. If such authorisation is rejected, the use shall be stopped with immediate effect and all the data, as well as the results and outputs of that use shall be immediately discarded and deleted.
L-awtorità ġudizzjarja kompetenti jew awtorità amministrattiva indipendenti li d-deċiżjoni tagħha tkun vinkolanti għandha tagħti l-awtorizzazzjoni biss meta tkun sodisfatta, abbażi ta' evidenza oġġettiva jew indikazzjonijiet ċari ppreżentati lilha, li l-użu tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” ikkonċernata hu meħtieġ u proporzjonat biex jintlaħaq wieħed mill-objettivi speċifikati fil-paragrafu 1, l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h), kif identifikat fit-talba u, b'mod partikolari, jibqa' limitat għal dak li huwa strettament meħtieġ fir-rigward tat-tul ta' żmien u l-firxa ġeografika u personali. Meta tiddeċiedi dwar it-talba, dik l-awtorità għandha tqis l-elementi msemmijin fil-paragrafu 2. L-ebda deċiżjoni li tipproduċi effett legali negattiv fuq persuna ma tista' tittieħed abbażi biss tal-output tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali”.
The competent judicial authority or an independent administrative authority whose decision is binding shall grant the authorisation only where it is satisfied, on the basis of objective evidence or clear indications presented to it, that the use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system concerned is necessary for, and proportionate to, achieving one of the objectives specified in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), as identified in the request and, in particular, remains limited to what is strictly necessary concerning the period of time as well as the geographic and personal scope. In deciding on the request, that authority shall take into account the elements referred to in paragraph 2. No decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person may be taken based solely on the output of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system.
4. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-paragrafu 3, kull użu ta' sistema ta' identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi għandu jiġi notifikat lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti u lill-awtorità nazzjonali għall-protezzjoni tad-data f'konformità mar-regoli nazzjonali msemmija fil-paragrafu 5. Bħala minimu, in-notifika għandha tinkludi l-informazzjoni speċifikata fil-paragrafu 6 u ma għandhiex tinkludi data operazzjonali sensittiva.
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, each use of a ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement purposes shall be notified to the relevant market surveillance authority and the national data protection authority in accordance with the national rules referred to in paragraph 5. The notification shall, as a minimum, contain the information specified under paragraph 6 and shall not include sensitive operational data.
5. Stat Membru jista' jiddeċiedi li jipprevedi l-possibbiltà li jawtorizza għalkollox jew parzjalment l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi skont il-limiti u l-kundizzjonijiet elenkati fil-paragrafu 1, l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h), u l-paragrafi 2 u 3. L-Istati Membri kkonċernati għandhom jistabbilixxu fil-liġi nazzjonali tagħhom ir-regoli dettaljati meħtieġa għat-talba, il-ħruġ u l-eżerċitar tal-awtorizzazzjonijiet imsemmija fil-paragrafu 3, kif ukoll għas-superviżjoni u r-rappurtar relatati magħhom. Dawk ir-regoli għandhom jispeċifikaw ukoll fir-rigward ta' liema objettivi elenkati fil-paragrafu 1, l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h), inkluż liema reati kriminali msemmija fil-punt (h)(iii) tiegħu, l-awtoritajiet kompetenti jistgħu jkunu awtorizzati jużaw dawk is-sistemi għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi. L-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw dawk ir-regoli lill-Kummissjoni sa mhux aktar tard minn 30 jum wara l-adozzjoni tagħhom. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jintroduċu, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, liġijiet aktar restrittivi dwar l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota.
5. A Member State may decide to provide for the possibility to fully or partially authorise the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement within the limits and under the conditions listed in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), and paragraphs 2 and 3. Member States concerned shall lay down in their national law the necessary detailed rules for the request, issuance and exercise of, as well as supervision and reporting relating to, the authorisations referred to in paragraph 3. Those rules shall also specify in respect of which of the objectives listed in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), including which of the criminal offences referred to in point (h)(iii) thereof, the competent authorities may be authorised to use those systems for the purposes of law enforcement. Member States shall notify those rules to the Commission at the latest 30 days following the adoption thereof. Member States may introduce, in accordance with Union law, more restrictive laws on the use of remote biometric identification systems.
6. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tal-protezzjoni tad-data tal-Istati Membri li ġew notifikati dwar l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi skont il-paragrafu 4 għandhom jippreżentaw lill-Kummissjoni rapporti annwali dwar it-tali użu. Għal dak il-għan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tipprovdi lill-Istati Membri u lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u tal-protezzjoni tad-data, mudell, fejn jinkludi informazzjoni dwar l-għadd tad-deċiżjonijiet meħuda mill-awtoritajiet ġudizzjarji kompetenti jew awtorità amministrattiva indipendenti li d-deċiżjoni tagħha hija vinkolanti fuq talbiet għal awtorizzazzjonijiet f'konformità mal-paragrafu 3 u r-riżultat tagħhom.
6. National market surveillance authorities and the national data protection authorities of Member States that have been notified of the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement purposes pursuant to paragraph 4 shall submit to the Commission annual reports on such use. For that purpose, the Commission shall provide Member States and national market surveillance and data protection authorities with a template, including information on the number of the decisions taken by competent judicial authorities or an independent administrative authority whose decision is binding upon requests for authorisations in accordance with paragraph 3 and their result.
7. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tippubblika rapporti annwali dwar l-użu ta' sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “fil-ħin reali” fi spazji aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għal finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi abbażi tad-data aggregata fl-Istati Membri bbażati fuq ir-rapporti annwali msemmija fil-paragrafu 6. Dawk ir-rapporti annwali ma għandhomx jinkludu data operazzjonali sensittiva tal-attivitajiet relatati tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
7. The Commission shall publish annual reports on the use of real-time remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement purposes, based on aggregated data in Member States on the basis of the annual reports referred to in paragraph 6. Those annual reports shall not include sensitive operational data of the related law enforcement activities.
8. Dan l-Artikolu ma għandux jaffettwa l-projbizzjonijiet li japplikaw meta prattika tal-IA tikser liġi oħra tal-Unjoni.
8. This Article shall not affect the prohibitions that apply where an AI practice infringes other Union law.
KAPITOLU III
CHAPTER III
SISTEMI TAL-IA B'RISKJU GĦOLI
HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
TAQSIMA 1
SECTION 1
Klassifikazzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA bħala b'riskju għoli
Classification of AI systems as high-risk
Artikolu 6
Article 6
Regoli ta' klassifikazzjoni għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli
Classification rules for high-risk AI systems
1. Irrispettivament minn jekk sistema tal-IA tiġix introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz b'mod indipendenti mill-prodotti msemmija fil-punti (a) u (b), dik is-sistema tal-IA għandha titqies bħala riskju għoli jekk tkun tissodisfa ż-żewġ kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin:
1. Irrespective of whether an AI system is placed on the market or put into service independently of the products referred to in points (a) and (b), that AI system shall be considered to be high-risk where both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
(a)
is-sistema tal-IA hija maħsuba biex tintuża bħala komponent tas-sikurezza ta' prodott, jew is-sistema tal-IA tkun hi stess prodott, kopert bil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I;
(a)
the AI system is intended to be used as a safety component of a product, or the AI system is itself a product, covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I;
(b)
il-prodott li l-komponent tas-sikurezza tiegħu skont il-punt (a) huwa s-sistema tal-IA, jew is-sistema tal-IA hi stess bħala prodott, jeħtieġ issirlu valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn parti terza, bil-ħsieb li dak il-prodott jiġi introdott fis-suq jew imqiegħed fis-servizz skont il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I.
(b)
the product whose safety component pursuant to point (a) is the AI system, or the AI system itself as a product, is required to undergo a third-party conformity assessment, with a view to the placing on the market or the putting into service of that product pursuant to the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I.
2. Minbarra s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-paragrafu 1, is-sistemi tal-IA msemmija fl-Anness III għandhom ukoll jitqiesu bħala b'riskju għoli.
2. In addition to the high-risk AI systems referred to in paragraph 1, AI systems referred to in Annex III shall be considered to be high-risk.
3. B'deroga mill-paragrafu 2, sistema tal-IA msemmija fl-Anness III ma għandhiex titqies bħala b'riskju għoli fejn ma toħloqx riskju sinifikanti ta' ħsara, għas-saħħa, għas-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali tal-persuni fiżiċi, inkluż billi ma tinfluwenzax materjalment l-eżitu tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet.
3. By derogation from paragraph 2, an AI system referred to in Annex III shall not be considered to be high-risk where it does not pose a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons, including by not materially influencing the outcome of decision making.
L-ewwel subparagrafu għandu japplika fejn tiġi ssodisfata kwalunkwe waħda mill-kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin:
The first subparagraph shall apply where any of the following conditions is fulfilled:
(a)
is-sistema tal-IA hija maħsuba biex twettaq kompitu proċedurali ristrett;
(a)
the AI system is intended to perform a narrow procedural task;
(b)
is-sistema tal-IA hija maħsuba biex ittejjeb ir-riżultat ta' attività mill-bniedem li tkun tlestiet qabel;
(b)
the AI system is intended to improve the result of a previously completed human activity;
(c)
is-sistema tal-IA hija maħsuba biex tikxef xejriet ta' teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet jew devjazzjonijiet minn xejriet ta' teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet preċedenti u mhijiex maħsuba biex tissostitwixxi jew tinfluwenza l-valutazzjoni mill-bniedem li tkun tlestiet qabel, mingħajr rieżami xieraq mill-bniedem; jew
(c)
the AI system is intended to detect decision-making patterns or deviations from prior decision-making patterns and is not meant to replace or influence the previously completed human assessment, without proper human review; or
(d)
is-sistema tal-IA hija maħsuba biex twettaq kompitu preparatorju għal valutazzjoni rilevanti għall-finijiet tal-każijiet ta' użu elenkati fl-Anness III.
(d)
the AI system is intended to perform a preparatory task to an assessment relevant for the purposes of the use cases listed in Annex III.
Minkejja l-ewwel subparagrafu, sistema tal-IA msemmija fl-Anness III għandha dejjem titqies bħala b'riskju għoli meta s-sistema tal-IA twettaq tfassil tal-profili ta' persuni fiżiċi.
Notwithstanding the first subparagraph, an AI system referred to in Annex III shall always be considered to be high-risk where the AI system performs profiling of natural persons.
4. Fornitur li jqis li sistema tal-IA msemmija fl-Anness III mhix b'riskju għoli għandu jiddokumenta l-valutazzjoni tiegħu qabel ma dik is-sistema tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz. Tali fornitur għandu jkun soġġett għall-obbligu ta' reġistrazzjoni stipulat fl-Artikolu 49(2). Fuq talba tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, il-fornitur għandu jipprovdi d-dokumentazzjoni tal-valutazzjoni.
4. A provider who considers that an AI system referred to in Annex III is not high-risk shall document its assessment before that system is placed on the market or put into service. Such provider shall be subject to the registration obligation set out in Article 49(2). Upon request of national competent authorities, the provider shall provide the documentation of the assessment.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha, wara li tikkonsulta lill-Bord Ewropew għall-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali (il-“Bord”), u mhux aktar tard mit-2 ta’ Frar 2026, tipprovdi linji gwida li jispeċifikaw l-implimentazzjoni prattika ta' dan l-Artikolu f'konformità mal-Artikolu 96 flimkien ma' lista komprensiva ta' eżempji prattiċi ta' każijiet ta' użu ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u mingħajr riskju għoli.
5. The Commission shall, after consulting the European Artificial Intelligence Board (the ‘Board’), and no later than 2 February 2026, provide guidelines specifying the practical implementation of this Article in line with Article 96 together with a comprehensive list of practical examples of use cases of AI systems that are high-risk and not high-risk.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 biex temenda l-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti fil-paragrafu 3, l-ewwel subparagrafu, ta' dan l-Artikolu. Il-Kummissjoni tingħata s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-paragrafu 3, it-tieni subparagrafu, ta’ dan l-Artikolu billi żżid kundizzjonijiet ġodda ma' dawk stabbiliti fih, jew billi timmodifikahom, meta jkun hemm evidenza konkreta u affidabbli tal-eżistenza ta' sistemi tal-IA li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-Anness III iżda li ma joħolqux riskju sinifikanti ta' ħsara għas-saħħa, għas-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali ta' persuni fiżiċi.
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend paragraph 3, second subparagraph, of this Article by adding new conditions to those laid down therein, or by modifying them, where there is concrete and reliable evidence of the existence of AI systems that fall under the scope of Annex III, but do not pose a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons.
7. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-paragrafu 3, it-tieni subparagrafu, ta’ dan l-Artikolu billi tħassar kwalunkwe waħda mill-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti fih, fejn ikun hemm evidenza konkreta u affidabbli li dan ikun meħtieġ biex jinżamm il-livell ta' protezzjoni tas-saħħa, tas-sikurezza u tad-drittijiet fundamentali previsti f’dan ir-Regolament.
7. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend paragraph 3, second subparagraph, of this Article by deleting any of the conditions laid down therein, where there is concrete and reliable evidence that this is necessary to maintain the level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights provided for by this Regulation.
8. Kwalunkwe emenda għall-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti fil-paragrafu 3, it-tieni subparagrafu, adottati f’konformità mal-paragrafi 6 u 7 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, ma għandhiex tnaqqas il-livell ġenerali ta' protezzjoni tas-saħħa, tas-sikurezza u tad-drittijiet fundamentali previsti f’dan ir-Regolament u għandha tiżgura konsistenza mal-atti delegati adottati skont l-Artikolu 7(1), u tqis l-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi u tas-suq.
8. Any amendment to the conditions laid down in paragraph 3, second subparagraph, adopted in accordance with paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Article shall not decrease the overall level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights provided for by this Regulation and shall ensure consistency with the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 7(1), and take account of market and technological developments.
Artikolu 7
Article 7
Emendi għall-Anness III
Amendments to Annex III
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 biex temenda l-Anness III billi żżid jew timmodifika każijiet ta' użu ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli meta ż-żewġ kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin huma ssodisfati:
1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to amend Annex III by adding or modifying use-cases of high-risk AI systems where both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
(a)
is-sistemi tal-IA jkunu maħsuba biex jintużaw f'xi waħda miż-żoni elenkati fl-Anness III;
(a)
the AI systems are intended to be used in any of the areas listed in Annex III;
(b)
is-sistemi tal-IA joħolqu riskju ta' ħsara għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza, jew ta' impatt negattiv fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali, u dak ir-riskju huwa ekwivalenti jew akbar mir-riskju ta' ħsara jew ta' impatt negattiv maħluq mis-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli diġà msemmija fl-Anness III.
(b)
the AI systems pose a risk of harm to health and safety, or an adverse impact on fundamental rights, and that risk is equivalent to, or greater than, the risk of harm or of adverse impact posed by the high-risk AI systems already referred to in Annex III.
2. Meta tivvaluta l-kundizzjoni skont il-paragrafu 1, il-punt (b), il-Kummissjoni għandha tqis il-kriterji li ġejjin:
2. When assessing the condition under paragraph 1, point (b), the Commission shall take into account the following criteria:
(a)
l-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA;
(a)
the intended purpose of the AI system;
(b)
il-punt sa fejn intużat jew aktarx tintuża sistema tal-IA;
(b)
the extent to which an AI system has been used or is likely to be used;
(c)
in-natura u l-ammont tad-data pproċessata u użata mis-sistema tal-IA, b'mod partikolari jekk jiġux ipproċessati kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali;
(c)
the nature and amount of the data processed and used by the AI system, in particular whether special categories of personal data are processed;
(d)
il-punt sa fejn is-sistema tal-IA taġixxi b'mod awtonomu u l-possibbiltà li bniedem jegħleb deċiżjoni jew rakkomandazzjonijiet li jistgħu jwasslu għal ħsara potenzjali;
(d)
the extent to which the AI system acts autonomously and the possibility for a human to override a decision or recommendations that may lead to potential harm;
(e)
il-punt sa fejn l-użu ta' sistema tal-IA diġà kkawża ħsara għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza, kellu impatt negattiv fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali jew wassal għal tħassib sinifikanti fir-rigward tal-materjalizzazzjoni ta' din il-ħsara jew l-impatt negattiv, kif muri, pereżempju, minn rapporti jew allegazzjonijiet dokumentati ppreżentati lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jew minn rapporti oħra, skont il-każ;
(e)
the extent to which the use of an AI system has already caused harm to health and safety, has had an adverse impact on fundamental rights or has given rise to significant concerns in relation to the likelihood of such harm or adverse impact, as demonstrated, for example, by reports or documented allegations submitted to national competent authorities or by other reports, as appropriate;
(f)
il-firxa potenzjali ta' din il-ħsara jew ta' dan l-impatt negattiv, b'mod partikolari f'termini tal-intensità tiegħu u l-kapaċità tiegħu li jaffettwa diversi persuni jew li jaffettwa b'mod sproporzjonat grupp partikolari ta' persuni;
(f)
the potential extent of such harm or such adverse impact, in particular in terms of its intensity and its ability to affect multiple persons or to disproportionately affect a particular group of persons;
(g)
il-punt sa fejn il-persuni li potenzjalment issirilhom ħsara jew isofru impatt negattiv ikunu dipendenti fuq l-eżitu prodott b'sistema tal-IA, b'mod partikolari meta għal raġunijiet prattiċi jew legali ma jkunx raġonevolment possibbli li persuna tagħżel li teskludi lilha nnifisha minn dak l-eżitu;
(g)
the extent to which persons who are potentially harmed or suffer an adverse impact are dependent on the outcome produced with an AI system, in particular because for practical or legal reasons it is not reasonably possible to opt-out from that outcome;
(h)
il-punt sa fejn jeżisti żbilanċ ta' poter, jew il-persuni li potenzjalment issirilhom ħsara jew isofru impatt negattiv ikunu f'pożizzjoni vulnerabbli fir-rigward tal-implimentatur ta' sistema tal-IA, b'mod partikolari minħabba status, awtorità, għarfien, ċirkostanzi ekonomiċi jew soċjali, jew età;
(h)
the extent to which there is an imbalance of power, or the persons who are potentially harmed or suffer an adverse impact are in a vulnerable position in relation to the deployer of an AI system, in particular due to status, authority, knowledge, economic or social circumstances, or age;
(i)
il-punt sa fejn l-eżitu prodott bl-involviment ta' sistema tal-IA jista' faċilment jiġi kkoreġut jew imreġġa' lura, b'kunsiderazzjoni għas-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi disponibbli biex jiġi kkoreġut jew mreġġa' lura, fejn l-eżiti li jkollhom impatt negattiv fuq is-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew id-drittijiet fundamentali, ma għandhomx jitqiesu bħala li jistgħu jiġu kkoreġuti jew mreġġgħin lura faċilment;
(i)
the extent to which the outcome produced involving an AI system is easily corrigible or reversible, taking into account the technical solutions available to correct or reverse it, whereby outcomes having an adverse impact on health, safety or fundamental rights, shall not be considered to be easily corrigible or reversible;
(j)
il-kobor u l-probabbiltà tal-benefiċċju mill-implimentazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA għal individwi, gruppi jew għas-soċjetà inġenerali, inkluż titjib possibbli fis-sikurezza tal-prodott;
(j)
the magnitude and likelihood of benefit of the deployment of the AI system for individuals, groups, or society at large, including possible improvements in product safety;
(k)
il-punt sa fejn il-liġi eżistenti tal-Unjoni tipprevedi:
(k)
the extent to which existing Union law provides for:
(i)
miżuri effettivi ta' rimedju fir-rigward tar-riskji maħluqa minn sistema tal-IA, bl-esklużjoni ta' pretensjonijiet għal danni;
(i)
effective measures of redress in relation to the risks posed by an AI system, with the exclusion of claims for damages;
(ii)
miżuri effettivi għall-prevenzjoni jew il-minimizzazzjoni sostanzjali ta' dawk ir-riskji.
(ii)
effective measures to prevent or substantially minimise those risks.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 biex temenda l-lista fl-Anness III billi tneħħi sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli meta ż-żewġ kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin huma ssodisfati:
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to amend the list in Annex III by removing high-risk AI systems where both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
(a)
is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli kkonċernata ma tibqax toħloq riskji sinifikanti għad-drittijiet fundamentali, għas-saħħa jew għas-sikurezza, b'kunsiderazzjoni għall-kriterji elenkati fil-paragrafu 2;
(a)
the high-risk AI system concerned no longer poses any significant risks to fundamental rights, health or safety, taking into account the criteria listed in paragraph 2;
(b)
it-tħassir ma jnaqqasx il-livell ġenerali ta' protezzjoni tas-saħħa, tas-sikurezza u tad-drittijiet fundamentali skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni.
(b)
the deletion does not decrease the overall level of protection of health, safety and fundamental rights under Union law.
TAQSIMA 2
SECTION 2
Rekwiżiti għal sistemi b'riskju għoli
Requirements for high-risk AI systems
Artikolu 8
Article 8
Konformità mar-rekwiżiti
Compliance with the requirements
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti stabbiliti f'din it-Taqsima, b'kunsiderazzjoni tal-għan maħsub tagħhom kif ukoll tal-ogħla żvilupp tekniku ġeneralment rikonoxxut fir-rigward tal-IA u teknoloġiji relatati mal-IA. Meta tkun qed tiġi żgurata l-konformità ma' dawk ir-rekwiżiti għandha titqies is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju msemmija fl-Artikolu 9.
1. High-risk AI systems shall comply with the requirements laid down in this Section, taking into account their intended purpose as well as the generally acknowledged state of the art on AI and AI-related technologies. The risk management system referred to in Article 9 shall be taken into account when ensuring compliance with those requirements.
2. Meta prodott ikun fih sistema tal-IA, li għaliha japplikaw ir-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament kif ukoll ir-rekwiżiti tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkati fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I, il-fornituri għandhom ikunu responsabbli biex jiżguraw li l-prodott tagħhom ikun kompletament konformi mar-rekwiżiti applikabbli kollha skont il-leġiżlazzjoni applikabbli tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni. Meta jkunu qed jiżguraw il-konformità ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 mar-rekwiżiti stipulati f'din it-Taqsima, u sabiex jiżguraw il-konsistenza, jevitaw id-duplikazzjonijiet u jimminimizzaw il-piżijiet addizzjonali, il-fornituri għandu jkollhom għażla li jintegraw, skont il-każ, il-proċessi ta' ttestjar u ta' rapportar, l-informazzjoni u d-dokumentazzjoni meħtieġa li jipprovdu fir-rigward tal-prodott tagħhom fid-dokumentazzjoni u l-proċeduri diġà eżistenti u li huma meħtieġa skont il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I.
2. Where a product contains an AI system, to which the requirements of this Regulation as well as requirements of the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I apply, providers shall be responsible for ensuring that their product is fully compliant with all applicable requirements under applicable Union harmonisation legislation. In ensuring the compliance of high-risk AI systems referred to in paragraph 1 with the requirements set out in this Section, and in order to ensure consistency, avoid duplication and minimise additional burdens, providers shall have a choice of integrating, as appropriate, the necessary testing and reporting processes, information and documentation they provide with regard to their product into documentation and procedures that already exist and are required under the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I.
Artikolu 9
Article 9
Sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju
Risk management system
1. Għandha tiġi stabbilita, implimentata, dokumentata u miżmuma sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
1. A risk management system shall be established, implemented, documented and maintained in relation to high-risk AI systems.
2. Is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju għandha tinftiehem bħala proċess iterattiv kontinwu ppjanat u li jseħħ tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja kollu ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, li jirrikjedi rieżami u aġġornament sistematiċi regolari. Għandu jkun fiha l-passi li ġejjin:
2. The risk management system shall be understood as a continuous iterative process planned and run throughout the entire lifecycle of a high-risk AI system, requiring regular systematic review and updating. It shall comprise the following steps:
(a)
l-identifikazzjoni u l-analiżi tar-riskji magħrufa u raġonevolment prevedibbli li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tista' toħloq għas-saħħa, għas-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali meta s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tintuża f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha;
(a)
the identification and analysis of the known and the reasonably foreseeable risks that the high-risk AI system can pose to health, safety or fundamental rights when the high-risk AI system is used in accordance with its intended purpose;
(b)
l-istima u l-evalwazzjoni tar-riskji li jistgħu jitfaċċaw meta s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tintuża f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha u f'kundizzjonijiet ta' użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli;
(b)
the estimation and evaluation of the risks that may emerge when the high-risk AI system is used in accordance with its intended purpose, and under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse;
(c)
l-evalwazzjoni ta' riskji oħra li jistgħu jinħolqu abbażi tal-analiżi tad-data miġbura mis-sistema ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq imsemmija fl-Artikolu 72;
(c)
the evaluation of other risks possibly arising, based on the analysis of data gathered from the post-market monitoring system referred to in Article 72;
(d)
l-adozzjoni ta' miżuri ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju xierqa u mmirati mfassla biex jindirizzaw ir-riskji identifikati skont il-punt (a).
(d)
the adoption of appropriate and targeted risk management measures designed to address the risks identified pursuant to point (a).
3. Ir-riskji msemmija f'dan l-Artikolu għandhom jikkonċernaw biss dawk li jistgħu jiġu mitigati jew eliminati b'mod raġonevoli bl-iżvilupp jew id-disinn tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, jew bl-għoti ta' informazzjoni teknika adegwata.
3. The risks referred to in this Article shall concern only those which may be reasonably mitigated or eliminated through the development or design of the high-risk AI system, or the provision of adequate technical information.
4. Il-miżuri ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju msemmija fil-paragrafu 2, il-punt (d) għandhom iqisu kif xieraq l-effetti u l-interazzjoni possibbli li jirriżultaw mill-applikazzjoni kkombinata tar-rekwiżiti stipulati f'din it-Taqsima, bil-għan li jiġu minimizzati r-riskji b'mod aktar effettiv filwaqt li jinkiseb bilanċ xieraq fl-implimentazzjoni tal-miżuri biex jiġu ssodisfati dawk ir-rekwiżiti.
4. The risk management measures referred to in paragraph 2, point (d), shall give due consideration to the effects and possible interaction resulting from the combined application of the requirements set out in this Section, with a view to minimising risks more effectively while achieving an appropriate balance in implementing the measures to fulfil those requirements.
5. Il-miżuri ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju msemmija fil-paragrafu 2, il-punt (d) għandhom ikunu tali li r-riskju residwu rilevanti assoċjat ma' kull periklu kif ukoll ir-riskju residwu ġenerali tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jitqies aċċettabbli.
5. The risk management measures referred to in paragraph 2, point (d), shall be such that the relevant residual risk associated with each hazard, as well as the overall residual risk of the high-risk AI systems is judged to be acceptable.
Fl-identifikazzjoni tal-aktar miżuri xierqa ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju, għandu jkun żgurat dan li ġej:
In identifying the most appropriate risk management measures, the following shall be ensured:
(a)
l-eliminazzjoni jew it-tnaqqis tar-riskji identifikati u evalwati skont il-paragrafu 2 sa fejn hu teknikament possibbli permezz ta' disinn u żvilupp adegwati tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(a)
elimination or reduction of risks identified and evaluated pursuant to paragraph 2 in as far as technically feasible through adequate design and development of the high-risk AI system;
(b)
meta xieraq, l-implimentazzjoni ta' miżuri adegwati ta' mitigazzjoni u ta' kontroll li jindirizzaw ir-riskji li ma jistgħux jiġu eliminati;
(b)
where appropriate, implementation of adequate mitigation and control measures addressing risks that cannot be eliminated;
(c)
l-għoti ta' informazzjoni meħtieġa skont l-Artikolu 13, u, meta xieraq, taħriġ lill-implimentaturi.
(c)
provision of information required pursuant to Article 13 and, where appropriate, training to deployers.
Bil-ħsieb tal-eliminazzjoni jew it-tnaqqis tar-riskji relatati mal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, għandha tingħata kunsiderazzjoni dovuta lill-għarfien tekniku, l-esperjenza, l-edukazzjoni, it-taħriġ li għandu jkun mistenni mill-implimentatur u l-kuntest preżunt li fih tkun maħsuba li tintuża s-sistema.
With a view to eliminating or reducing risks related to the use of the high-risk AI system, due consideration shall be given to the technical knowledge, experience, education, the training to be expected by the deployer, and the presumable context in which the system is intended to be used.
6. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jiġu ttestjati għall-finit tal-identifikazzjoni tal-aktar miżuri ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju xierqa u mmirati. L-ittestjar għandu jiżgura li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jaħdmu b'mod konsistenti għall-għan maħsub tagħhom u li jkunu konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati f'din it-Taqsima.
6. High-risk AI systems shall be tested for the purpose of identifying the most appropriate and targeted risk management measures. Testing shall ensure that high-risk AI systems perform consistently for their intended purpose and that they are in compliance with the requirements set out in this Section.
7. Il-proċeduri tal-ittestjar jistgħu jinkludu ttestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali skont l-Artikolu 60.
7. Testing procedures may include testing in real-world conditions in accordance with Article 60.
8. L-ittestjar ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandu jitwettaq, kif xieraq, fi kwalunkwe ħin matul il-proċess ta' żvilupp, u, fi kwalunkwe każ, qabel l-introduzzjoni tagħhom fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz. L-ittestjar għandu jitwettaq ma' metrika definita minn qabel u limiti massimi probabilistiċi li huma adattati għall-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
8. The testing of high-risk AI systems shall be performed, as appropriate, at any time throughout the development process, and, in any event, prior to their being placed on the market or put into service. Testing shall be carried out against prior defined metrics and probabilistic thresholds that are appropriate to the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system.
9. Meta jkunu qed jimplimentaw is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju kif previst fil-paragrafi 1 sa 7, il-fornituri għandhom iqisu jekk, fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tagħha, is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli x'aktarx ikollha impatt negattiv fuq il-persuni taħt it-18-il sena u, kif xieraq, fuq gruppi oħra vulnerabbli.
9. When implementing the risk management system as provided for in paragraphs 1 to 7, providers shall give consideration to whether in view of its intended purpose the high-risk AI system is likely to have an adverse impact on persons under the age of 18 and, as appropriate, other vulnerable groups.
10. Għall-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma soġġetti għal rekwiżiti rigward il-proċessi ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju interni skont dispożizzjonijiet rilevanti oħra tal-liġi tal-Unjoni, l-aspetti previsti fil-paragrafi 1 sa 9 jistgħu jkunu parti mill-proċeduri ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju stabbiliti skont dik il-liġi, jew ikkombinati magħhom.
10. For providers of high-risk AI systems that are subject to requirements regarding internal risk management processes under other relevant provisions of Union law, the aspects provided in paragraphs 1 to 9 may be part of, or combined with, the risk management procedures established pursuant to that law.
Artikolu 10
Article 10
Data u governanza tad-data
Data and data governance
1. Sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jagħmlu użu minn tekniki li jinvolvu t-taħriġ ta' mudelli tal-IA b'data għandhom jiġu żviluppati abbażi ta' settijiet tad-data għal taħriġ, validazzjoni u ttestjar li jissodisfaw il-kriterji tal-kwalità msemmija fil-paragrafi 2 sa 5, kull meta jintużaw dawn is-settijiet tad-data.
1. High-risk AI systems which make use of techniques involving the training of AI models with data shall be developed on the basis of training, validation and testing data sets that meet the quality criteria referred to in paragraphs 2 to 5 whenever such data sets are used.
2. Is-settijiet tad-data għal taħriġ, validazzjoni u ttestjar għandhom ikunu soġġetti għal prattiki ta' governanza u ġestjoni tad-data xierqa għall-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Dawk il-prattiki għandhom jikkonċernaw b'mod partikolari:
2. Training, validation and testing data sets shall be subject to data governance and management practices appropriate for the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system. Those practices shall concern in particular:
(a)
l-għażliet ta' disinn rilevanti;
(a)
the relevant design choices;
(b)
il-proċessi tal-ġbir tad-data u l-oriġini tad-data, u fil-każ ta' data personali, l-iskop oriġinali tal-ġbir tad-data;
(b)
data collection processes and the origin of data, and in the case of personal data, the original purpose of the data collection;
(c)
operazzjonijiet rilevanti ta' pproċessar ta' tħejjija tad-data, bħall-annotazzjoni, it-tikkettar, it-tindif, l-aġġornament, l-arrikkiment u l-aggregazzjoni;
(c)
relevant data-preparation processing operations, such as annotation, labelling, cleaning, updating, enrichment and aggregation;
(d)
il-formulazzjoni ta' suppożizzjonijiet, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-informazzjoni li d-data suppost tkejjel u tirrappreżenta;
(d)
the formulation of assumptions, in particular with respect to the information that the data are supposed to measure and represent;
(e)
valutazzjoni tad-disponibbiltà, il-kwantità u l-adegwatezza tas-settijiet tad-data li huma meħtieġa;
(e)
an assessment of the availability, quantity and suitability of the data sets that are needed;
(f)
l-eżami fid-dawl ta' preġudizzji possibbli li x'aktarx jaffettwaw is-saħħa u s-sikurezza tal-persuni, ikollhom impatt negattiv fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali jew iwasslu għal diskriminazzjoni pprojbita skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni, speċjalment fejn l-outputs tad-data jinfluwenzaw l-inputs għal operazzjonijiet futuri;
(f)
examination in view of possible biases that are likely to affect the health and safety of persons, have a negative impact on fundamental rights or lead to discrimination prohibited under Union law, especially where data outputs influence inputs for future operations;
(g)
miżuri xierqa għall-kxif, il-prevenzjoni u l-mitigazzjoni tal-preġudizzji possibbli identifikati skont il-punt (f);
(g)
appropriate measures to detect, prevent and mitigate possible biases identified according to point (f);
(h)
l-identifikazzjoni ta' lakuni jew nuqqasijiet rilevanti fid-data li jfixklu l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, u kif dawk il-lakuni u n-nuqqasijiet jistgħu jiġu indirizzati.
(h)
the identification of relevant data gaps or shortcomings that prevent compliance with this Regulation, and how those gaps and shortcomings can be addressed.
3. Is-settijiet tad-data għal taħriġ, validazzjoni u ttestjar għandhom ikunu rilevanti, rappreżentattivi biżżejjed, u kemm jista' jkun possibbli, mingħajr żbalji u kompluti fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub. Għandu jkollhom il-proprjetajiet statistiċi adatti, inkluż, fejn applikabbli, fir-rigward tal-persuni jew il-gruppi ta' persuni fir-rigward ta' min is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkun maħsuba li tintuża. Dawk il-karatteristiċi tas-settijiet tad-data jistgħu jiġu ssodisfati fil-livell ta' settijiet tad-data individwali jew fil-livell ta' taħlita tagħhom.
3. Training, validation and testing data sets shall be relevant, sufficiently representative, and to the best extent possible, free of errors and complete in view of the intended purpose. They shall have the appropriate statistical properties, including, where applicable, as regards the persons or groups of persons in relation to whom the high-risk AI system is intended to be used. Those characteristics of the data sets may be met at the level of individual data sets or at the level of a combination thereof.
4. Is-settijiet tad-data għandhom iqisu, sa fejn ikun mitlub mill-għan maħsub, il-karatteristiċi jew l-elementi li jkunu partikolari għall-ambjent ġeografiku, kuntestwali, komportamentali jew funzjonali speċifiku li fih tkun maħsuba li tintuża s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
4. Data sets shall take into account, to the extent required by the intended purpose, the characteristics or elements that are particular to the specific geographical, contextual, behavioural or functional setting within which the high-risk AI system is intended to be used.
5. Sal-punt li jkun strettament meħtieġ għall-fini li jiġu żgurati l-kxif u l-korrezzjoni tal-preġudizzju fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-paragrafu (2), il-punti (f) u (g) ta' dan l-Artikolu, il-fornituri ta' tali sistemi jistgħu jipproċessaw b'mod eċċezzjonali kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali, soġġett għal salvagwardji xierqa għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet fundamentali tal-persuni fiżiċi. Minbarra d-dispożizzjonijiet stipulati fir-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 u (UE) 2018/1725, id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, sabiex iseħħ tali pproċessar iridu jiġu ssodisfati l-kundizzjonijiet kollha li ġejjin:
5. To the extent that it is strictly necessary for the purpose of ensuring bias detection and correction in relation to the high-risk AI systems in accordance with paragraph (2), points (f) and (g) of this Article, the providers of such systems may exceptionally process special categories of personal data, subject to appropriate safeguards for the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons. In addition to the provisions set out in Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, all the following conditions must be met in order for such processing to occur:
(a)
il-kxif u l-korrezzjoni ta' preġudizzju ma jistgħux jiġu ssodisfati b'mod effettiv bl-ipproċessar ta' data oħra, inkluż data sintetika jew anonimizzata;
(a)
the bias detection and correction cannot be effectively fulfilled by processing other data, including synthetic or anonymised data;
(b)
il-kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali huma soġġetti għal limitazzjonijiet tekniċi fuq l-użu mill-ġdid tad-data personali u miżuri ta' sigurtà u preservazzjoni tal-privatezza tal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku, inkluża l-psewdonimizzazzjoni;
(b)
the special categories of personal data are subject to technical limitations on the re-use of the personal data, and state-of-the-art security and privacy-preserving measures, including pseudonymisation;
(c)
il-kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali huma soġġetti għal miżuri biex jiġi żgurat li d-data personali pproċessata tkun sigura, protetta, soġġetta għal salvagwardji xierqa, inkluż kontrolli stretti u dokumentazzjoni tal-aċċess, biex jiġi evitat l-użu ħażin u jiġi żgurat li persuni awtorizzati biss jkollhom aċċess għal dik id-data personali b'obbligi xierqa ta' kunfidenzjalità;
(c)
the special categories of personal data are subject to measures to ensure that the personal data processed are secured, protected, subject to suitable safeguards, including strict controls and documentation of the access, to avoid misuse and ensure that only authorised persons have access to those personal data with appropriate confidentiality obligations;
(d)
il-kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali ma għandhomx jiġu trażmessi, trasferiti jew aċċessati b'xi mod ieħor minn partijiet oħra;
(d)
the special categories of personal data are not to be transmitted, transferred or otherwise accessed by other parties;
(e)
il-kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali jitħassru ladarba l-preġudizzju jkun ġie kkoreġut jew id-data personali tkun laħqet tmiem il-perjodu ta' żamma tagħha, skont liema jiġi l-ewwel;
(e)
the special categories of personal data are deleted once the bias has been corrected or the personal data has reached the end of its retention period, whichever comes first;
(f)
ir-rekords tal-attivitajiet ta' pproċessar skont ir-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 u (UE) 2018/1725 u d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 jinkludu r-raġunijiet għaliex l-ipproċessar ta' kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali kien strettament meħtieġ biex jinkixfu u jiġu kkoreġuti l-preġudizzji u għaliex dak l-objettiv ma setax jintlaħaq bl-ipproċessar ta' data oħra.
(f)
the records of processing activities pursuant to Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680 include the reasons why the processing of special categories of personal data was strictly necessary to detect and correct biases, and why that objective could not be achieved by processing other data.
6. Għall-iżvilupp ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li ma jużawx tekniki li jinvolvu t-taħriġ ta' mudelli tal-IA, il-paragrafi 2 sa 5 japplikaw biss għas-settijiet tad-data tal-ittestjar.
6. For the development of high-risk AI systems not using techniques involving the training of AI models, paragraphs 2 to 5 apply only to the testing data sets.
Artikolu 11
Article 11
Dokumentazzjoni teknika
Technical documentation
1. Id-dokumentazzjoni teknika ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandha titfassal qabel ma dik is-sistema tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz u għandha tinżamm aġġornata.
1. The technical documentation of a high-risk AI system shall be drawn up before that system is placed on the market or put into service and shall be kept up-to date.
Id-dokumentazzjoni teknika għandha titfassal b'mod li turi li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti stipulati f'din it-Taqsima u tipprovdi lill-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali u lill-korpi notifikati bl-informazzjoni meħtieġa f'forma ċara u komprensiva biex tiġi vvalutata l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA ma' dawk ir-rekwiżiti. Bħala minimu, għandu jkun fiha l-elementi stipulati fl-Anness IV. L-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda, jistgħu jipprovdu l-elementi tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika speċifikata fl-Anness IV b'mod simplifikat. Għal dan il-għan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tistabbilixxi formola simplifikata ta' dokumentazzjoni teknika mmirata lejn il-ħtiġijiet tal-intrapriżi żgħar u mikro. Meta SME, inkluż negozju ġdid, tagħżel li tipprovdi l-informazzjoni rikjesta fl-Anness IV b'mod simplifikat, hija għandha tuża l-formola msemmija f'dan il-paragrafu. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jaċċettaw il-formola għall-finijiet tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità.
The technical documentation shall be drawn up in such a way as to demonstrate that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements set out in this Section and to provide national competent authorities and notified bodies with the necessary information in a clear and comprehensive form to assess the compliance of the AI system with those requirements. It shall contain, at a minimum, the elements set out in Annex IV. SMEs, including start-ups, may provide the elements of the technical documentation specified in Annex IV in a simplified manner. To that end, the Commission shall establish a simplified technical documentation form targeted at the needs of small and microenterprises. Where an SME, including a start-up, opts to provide the information required in Annex IV in a simplified manner, it shall use the form referred to in this paragraph. Notified bodies shall accept the form for the purposes of the conformity assessment.
2. Meta sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli relatata ma' prodott kopert mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz, għandu jitfassal sett uniku ta' dokumentazzjoni teknika bl-informazzjoni kollha stipulata fil-paragrafu 1, kif ukoll l-informazzjoni meħtieġa skont dawk l-atti legali.
2. Where a high-risk AI system related to a product covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I is placed on the market or put into service, a single set of technical documentation shall be drawn up containing all the information set out in paragraph 1, as well as the information required under those legal acts.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-Anness IV, meta meħtieġ, biex tiżgura li, fid-dawl tal-progress tekniku, id-dokumentazzjoni teknika tipprovdi l-informazzjoni kollha meħtieġa għal valutazzjoni tal-konformità tas-sistema mar-rekwiżiti stipulati f'din it-Taqsima.
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annex IV, where necessary, to ensure that, in light of technical progress, the technical documentation provides all the information necessary to assess the compliance of the system with the requirements set out in this Section.
Artikolu 12
Article 12
Żamma tar-rekords
Record-keeping
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom teknikament jippermettu r-reġistrazzjoni awtomatika tal-avvenimenti (reġistri) tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja tas-sistema.
1. High-risk AI systems shall technically allow for the automatic recording of events (logs) over the lifetime of the system.
2. Sabiex jiġi żgurat livell ta' traċċabbiltà tal-funzjonament ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkun xieraq għall-għan maħsub tas-sistema, il-kapaċitajiet ta' reġistrar għandhom jiffaċilitaw r-reġistrazzjoni tal-avvenimenti rilevanti għal:
2. In order to ensure a level of traceability of the functioning of a high-risk AI system that is appropriate to the intended purpose of the system, logging capabilities shall enable the recording of events relevant for:
(a)
l-identifikazzjoni ta' sitwazzjonijiet li jistgħu jwasslu biex is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tippreżenta riskju skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 79(1) jew f'modifika sostanzjali;
(a)
identifying situations that may result in the high-risk AI system presenting a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1) or in a substantial modification;
(b)
il-faċilitazzjoni tas-sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq imsemmija fl-Artikolu 72; u
(b)
facilitating the post-market monitoring referred to in Article 72; and
(c)
il-monitoraġġ tat-tħaddim tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Artikolu 26(5).
(c)
monitoring the operation of high-risk AI systems referred to in Article 26(5).
3. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 1(a), tal-Anness III, il-kapaċitajiet ta' reġistrar għandhom jipprovdu, bħala minimu:
3. For high-risk AI systems referred to in point 1 (a), of Annex III, the logging capabilities shall provide, at a minimum:
(a)
ir-reġistrazzjoni tal-perjodu ta' kull użu tas-sistema (id-data u l-ħin tal-bidu u d-data u l-ħin tat-tmiem ta' kull użu);
(a)
recording of the period of each use of the system (start date and time and end date and time of each use);
(b)
il-bażi ta' data ta' referenza li magħha tiġi vverifikata d-data tal-input mis-sistema;
(b)
the reference database against which input data has been checked by the system;
(c)
id-data tal-input li magħha t-tfittxija wasslet għal konkordanza;
(c)
the input data for which the search has led to a match;
(d)
l-identifikazzjoni tal-persuni fiżiċi involuti fil-verifika tar-riżultati, kif imsemmija fl-Artikolu 14(5).
(d)
the identification of the natural persons involved in the verification of the results, as referred to in Article 14(5).
Artikolu 13
Article 13
Trasparenza u għoti tal-informazzjoni lill-implimentaturi
Transparency and provision of information to deployers
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jiġu ddisinjati u żviluppati b'tali mod li jkun żgurat li t-tħaddim tagħhom ikun trasparenti biżżejjed biex l-implimentaturi jkunu jistgħu jinterpretaw output ta' sistema u jużawh sew. Għandhom jiġu żgurati tip u livell xierqa ta' trasparenza bil-ħsieb li tinkiseb konformità mal-obbligi rilevanti tal-fornitur u l-implimentatur stipulati fit-Taqsima 3.
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way as to ensure that their operation is sufficiently transparent to enable deployers to interpret a system’s output and use it appropriately. An appropriate type and degree of transparency shall be ensured with a view to achieving compliance with the relevant obligations of the provider and deployer set out in Section 3.
2. Mas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jingħataw struzzjonijiet għall-użu b'format diġitali xieraq jew b'xi format ieħor li jinkludu informazzjoni konċiża, kompluta, korretta u ċara li tkun rilevanti, aċċessibbli u li tinftiehem mill-implimentaturi.
2. High-risk AI systems shall be accompanied by instructions for use in an appropriate digital format or otherwise that include concise, complete, correct and clear information that is relevant, accessible and comprehensible to deployers.
3. L-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu għandu jkun fihom mill-anqas l-informazzjoni li ġejja:
3. The instructions for use shall contain at least the following information:
(a)
l-identità u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur u, meta applikabbli, tar-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu;
(a)
the identity and the contact details of the provider and, where applicable, of its authorised representative;
(b)
il-karatteristiċi, il-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet tal-prestazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, inkluż:
(b)
the characteristics, capabilities and limitations of performance of the high-risk AI system, including:
(i)
l-għan maħsub tagħha;
(i)
its intended purpose;
(ii)
il-livell ta' akkuratezza, inkluż il-metrika, ir-robustezza u ċ-ċibersigurtà tagħha msemmija fl-Artikolu 15 li abbażi tiegħu tkun ġiet ittestjata u vvalidata s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u li jista' jkun mistenni, u kull ċirkostanza magħrufa u prevedibbli li tista' tħalli impatt fuq dak il-livell mistenni ta' akkuratezza, robustezza u ċibersigurtà;
(ii)
the level of accuracy, including its metrics, robustness and cybersecurity referred to in Article 15 against which the high-risk AI system has been tested and validated and which can be expected, and any known and foreseeable circumstances that may have an impact on that expected level of accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity;
(iii)
kwalunkwe ċirkostanza magħrufa jew prevedibbli, relatata mal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha jew f'kundizzjonijiet ta' użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli, li tista' twassal għal riskji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali msemmija fl-Artikolu 9(2);
(iii)
any known or foreseeable circumstance, related to the use of the high-risk AI system in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse, which may lead to risks to the health and safety or fundamental rights referred to in Article 9(2);
(iv)
meta applikabbli, il-kapaċitajiet u l-karatteristiċi tekniċi tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli biex tkun provduta informazzjoni li tkun rilevanti biex tispjega l-output tagħha;
(iv)
where applicable, the technical capabilities and characteristics of the high-risk AI system to provide information that is relevant to explain its output;
(v)
fejn xieraq, il-prestazzjoni tagħha fir-rigward ta' persuni speċifiċi jew gruppi ta' persuni speċifiċi li s-sistema hi maħsuba li tintuża fuqhom;
(v)
when appropriate, its performance regarding specific persons or groups of persons on which the system is intended to be used;
(vi)
meta xieraq, l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet għad-data tal-input, jew kull informazzjoni rilevanti oħra f'termini tas-settijiet tad-data għal taħriġ, validazzjoni u ttestjar użati, filwaqt li jitqies l-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(vi)
when appropriate, specifications for the input data, or any other relevant information in terms of the training, validation and testing data sets used, taking into account the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system;
(vii)
fejn applikabbli, informazzjoni li tippermetti lill-implimentaturi jinterpretaw l-output tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u jużawh b'mod xieraq;
(vii)
where applicable, information to enable deployers to interpret the output of the high-risk AI system and use it appropriately;
(c)
il-bidliet fis-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u fil-prestazzjoni tagħha li jkunu ġew determinati minn qabel mill-fornitur fil-mument tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità inizjali, jekk ikun hemm;
(c)
the changes to the high-risk AI system and its performance which have been pre-determined by the provider at the moment of the initial conformity assessment, if any;
(d)
il-miżuri ta' sorveljanza mill-bniedem msemmija fl-Artikolu 14, inkluż il-miżuri tekniċi stabbiliti biex jiffaċilitaw l-interpretazzjoni tal-outputs ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli mill-implimentaturi;
(d)
the human oversight measures referred to in Article 14, including the technical measures put in place to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of the high-risk AI systems by the deployers;
(e)
ir-riżorsi komputazzjonali u ta' hardware meħtieġa, il-ħajja mistennija tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u kwalunkwe miżura ta' manutenzjoni u kura meħtieġa, inkluż il-frekwenza tagħhom, biex ikun żgurat il-funzjonament tajjeb ta' dik is-sistema tal-IA, inkluż fir-rigward tal-aġġornamenti tas-software;
(e)
the computational and hardware resources needed, the expected lifetime of the high-risk AI system and any necessary maintenance and care measures, including their frequency, to ensure the proper functioning of that AI system, including as regards software updates;
(f)
fejn ikun rilevanti, deskrizzjoni tal-mekkaniżmi inklużi fis-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li tippermetti lill-implimentaturi jiġbru, jaħżnu u jinterpretaw tajjeb ir-reġistri f'konformità mal-Artikolu 12.
(f)
where relevant, a description of the mechanisms included within the high-risk AI system that allows deployers to properly collect, store and interpret the logs in accordance with Article 12.
Artikolu 14
Article 14
Sorveljanza mill-bniedem
Human oversight
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jiġu ddisinjati u żviluppati b'tali mod, inkluż b'għodod xierqa ta' interfaċċa bejn il-bniedem u l-magna, li jistgħu jiġu sorveljati b'mod effettiv minn persuni fiżiċi waqt il-perjodu li jintużaw.
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way, including with appropriate human-machine interface tools, that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which they are in use.
2. Is-sorveljanza mill-bniedem għandu jkollha l-għan li tipprevjeni jew timminimizza r-riskji għas-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew id-drittijiet fundamentali li jistgħu jinħolqu waqt l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-għan maħsub tagħha jew f'kundizzjonijiet ta' użu ħażin raġonevolment prevedibbli, b'mod partikolari meta dawn ir-riskji jissoktaw minkejja l-applikazzjoni ta' rekwiżiti oħra stipulati f'din it-Taqsima.
2. Human oversight shall aim to prevent or minimise the risks to health, safety or fundamental rights that may emerge when a high-risk AI system is used in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions of reasonably foreseeable misuse, in particular where such risks persist despite the application of other requirements set out in this Section.
3. Il-miżuri ta' sorveljanza għandhom ikunu proporzjonati għar-riskji, il-livell ta' awtonomija u l-kuntest tal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u għandhom jiġu żgurati permezz ta' tip wieħed ta' miżuri li ġejjin jew mit-tnejn li huma:
3. The oversight measures shall be commensurate with the risks, level of autonomy and context of use of the high-risk AI system, and shall be ensured through either one or both of the following types of measures:
(a)
miżuri identifikati u mibnija, meta teknikament fattibbli, fis-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mill-fornitur qabel ma tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz;
(a)
measures identified and built, when technically feasible, into the high-risk AI system by the provider before it is placed on the market or put into service;
(b)
miżuri identifikati mill-fornitur qabel l-introduzzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz u li huma xierqa biex jiġu implimentati mill-implimentatur.
(b)
measures identified by the provider before placing the high-risk AI system on the market or putting it into service and that are appropriate to be implemented by the deployer.
4. Għall-fini tal-implimentazzjoni tal-paragrafi 1, 2 u 3, is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandha tiġi pprovduta lill-implimentatur b’tali mod li l-persuni fiżiċi li lilhom tiġi assenjata s-sorveljanza mill-bniedem ikunu jistgħu, kif xieraq u b'mod proporzjonat:
4. For the purpose of implementing paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, the high-risk AI system shall be provided to the deployer in such a way that natural persons to whom human oversight is assigned are enabled, as appropriate and proportionate:
(a)
jifhmu sew il-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet rilevanti tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u jkunu jistgħu jimmonitorjaw kif dovut l-operat tagħha, inkluż bil-ħsieb li jikxfu u jindirizzaw anomaliji, disfunzjonijiet u prestazzjoni mhux mistennija;
(a)
to properly understand the relevant capacities and limitations of the high-risk AI system and be able to duly monitor its operation, including in view of detecting and addressing anomalies, dysfunctions and unexpected performance;
(b)
jibqgħu konxji tat-tendenza possibbli li wieħed iserraħ awtomatikament jew li jserraħ wisq fuq l-output prodott minn sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli (preġudizzju tal-awtomatizzazzjoni), b'mod partikolari għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli użati biex jipprovdu informazzjoni jew rakkomandazzjonijiet għal deċiżjonijiet li jridu jittieħdu minn persuni fiżiċi;
(b)
to remain aware of the possible tendency of automatically relying or over-relying on the output produced by a high-risk AI system (automation bias), in particular for high-risk AI systems used to provide information or recommendations for decisions to be taken by natural persons;
(c)
jinterpretaw b'mod korrett l-output tas-sistema IA b'riskju għoli, filwaqt li jqisu, pereżempju, l-għodod u l-metodi ta' interpretazzjoni disponibbli;
(c)
to correctly interpret the high-risk AI system’s output, taking into account, for example, the interpretation tools and methods available;
(d)
jiddeċiedu, fi kwalunkwe sitwazzjoni partikolari, li ma jużawx is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli jew li jinjoraw, iwarrbu jew ireġġgħu lura l-output tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(d)
to decide, in any particular situation, not to use the high-risk AI system or to otherwise disregard, override or reverse the output of the high-risk AI system;
(e)
jintervjenu fit-tħaddim tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli jew jinterrompuha permezz ta' buttuna “stop” jew proċedura simili li permezz tagħha s-sistema tkun tista' tieqaf mingħajr periklu.
(e)
to intervene in the operation of the high-risk AI system or interrupt the system through a ‘stop’ button or a similar procedure that allows the system to come to a halt in a safe state.
5. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 1(a) tal-Anness III, il-miżuri msemmija fil-paragrafu 3 ta' dan l-Artikolu għandhom ikunu tali li jiżguraw li, barra minn hekk, ma tittieħed l-ebda azzjoni jew deċiżjoni mill-implimentatur abbażi tal-identifikazzjoni li tirriżulta mis-sistema sakemm dik l-identifikazzjoni ma tkunx ġiet verifikata u kkonfermata separatament minn tal-anqas żewġ persuni fiżiċi bil-kompetenza, it-taħriġ u l-awtorità meħtieġa.
5. For high-risk AI systems referred to in point 1(a) of Annex III, the measures referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article shall be such as to ensure that, in addition, no action or decision is taken by the deployer on the basis of the identification resulting from the system unless that identification has been separately verified and confirmed by at least two natural persons with the necessary competence, training and authority.
Ir-rekwiżit għal verifika separata minn mill-inqas żewġ persuni fiżiċi ma għandux japplika għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli użati għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-migrazzjoni, tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri jew tal-ażil, fejn il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali tqis li l-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-rekwiżit hija sproporzjonata.
The requirement for a separate verification by at least two natural persons shall not apply to high-risk AI systems used for the purposes of law enforcement, migration, border control or asylum, where Union or national law considers the application of this requirement to be disproportionate.
Artikolu 15
Article 15
Akkuratezza, robustezza u ċibersigurtà
Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jiġu ddisinjati u żviluppati b'tali mod li jiksbu livell xieraq ta' akkuratezza, robustezza u ċibersigurtà, u li l-prestazzjoni tagħhom fir-rigward ta' dawk l-aspetti tkun konsistenti tul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja tagħhom.
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity, and that they perform consistently in those respects throughout their lifecycle.
2. Sabiex tindirizza l-aspetti tekniċi ta' kif jitkejlu l-livelli xierqa ta' akkuratezza u robustezza stipulati fil-paragrafu 1 u kwalunkwe metrika tal-prestazzjoni rilevanti oħra, il-Kummissjoni għandha, f'kooperazzjoni mal-partijiet ikkonċernati u l-organizzazzjonijiet rilevanti bħall-metroloġija u l-awtoritajiet tal-valutazzjoni komparattiva, tħeġġeġ kif xieraq, l-iżvilupp ta' parametri referenzjarji u metodoloġiji tal-kejl.
2. To address the technical aspects of how to measure the appropriate levels of accuracy and robustness set out in paragraph 1 and any other relevant performance metrics, the Commission shall, in cooperation with relevant stakeholders and organisations such as metrology and benchmarking authorities, encourage, as appropriate, the development of benchmarks and measurement methodologies.
3. Il-livelli ta' akkuratezza u l-metrika tal-akkuratezza rilevanti tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jiġu dikjarati fl-istruzzjonijiet tal-użu li jakkumpanjawhom.
3. The levels of accuracy and the relevant accuracy metrics of high-risk AI systems shall be declared in the accompanying instructions of use.
4. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom ikunu kemm jista' jkun reżiljenti fir-rigward ta' żbalji, ħsarat jew inkonsistenzi li jistgħu jseħħu fis-sistema jew fl-ambjent li fih topera s-sistema, b'mod partikolari minħabba l-interazzjoni tagħhom ma' persuni fiżiċi jew ma' sistemi oħra. F'dan ir-rigward għandhom jittieħdu miżuri tekniċi u organizzattivi.
4. High-risk AI systems shall be as resilient as possible regarding errors, faults or inconsistencies that may occur within the system or the environment in which the system operates, in particular due to their interaction with natural persons or other systems. Technical and organisational measures shall be taken in this regard.
Ir-robustezza tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tista' tinkiseb b'soluzzjonijiet tekniċi ta' ridondanza, li jistgħu jinkludu pjanijiet ta' backup jew ta' fail-safe.
The robustness of high-risk AI systems may be achieved through technical redundancy solutions, which may include backup or fail-safe plans.
Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkomplu jitgħallmu wara li jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew jitqiegħdu fis-servizz għandhom jiġu żviluppati b'tali mod li jeliminaw jew inaqqsu kemm jista' jkun ir-riskju li outputs possibbilment ippreġudikati jinfluwenzaw l-input għal operazzjonijiet futuri (“feedback loops”), u biex jiġi żgurat li kwalunkwe feedback loop bħal dan jiġi indirizzat kif xieraq b'miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni xierqa.
High-risk AI systems that continue to learn after being placed on the market or put into service shall be developed in such a way as to eliminate or reduce as far as possible the risk of possibly biased outputs influencing input for future operations (feedback loops), and as to ensure that any such feedback loops are duly addressed with appropriate mitigation measures.
5. Is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom ikunu reżiljenti kontra tentattivi minn partijiet terzi mhux awtorizzati biex ibiddlu l-użu, l-outputs jew il-prestazzjoni tagħhom billi jisfruttaw il-vulnerabbiltajiet tas-sistema.
5. High-risk AI systems shall be resilient against attempts by unauthorised third parties to alter their use, outputs or performance by exploiting system vulnerabilities.
Is-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi mmirati biex jiżguraw iċ-ċibersigurtà tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom ikunu xierqa għaċ-ċirkostanzi rilevanti u għar-riskji.
The technical solutions aiming to ensure the cybersecurity of high-risk AI systems shall be appropriate to the relevant circumstances and the risks.
Is-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi biex jiġu indirizzati vulnerabbiltajiet speċifiċi tal-IA għandhom jinkludu, fejn xieraq, miżuri għall-prevenzjoni, il-kxif, ir-rispons għal, ir-riżoluzzjoni u l-kontroll ta' attakki li jippruvaw jimmanipulaw is-sett tad-data għat-taħriġ (avvelenament tad-data), jew komponenti mħarrġa minn qabel użati fit-taħriġ (avvelenament tal-mudell), inputs imfassla biex jġiegħlu lill-mudell tal-IA jiżbalja (eżempji kontradittorji jew evażjoni tal-mudell), attakki fuq il-kunfidenzjalità jew difetti fil-mudell.
The technical solutions to address AI specific vulnerabilities shall include, where appropriate, measures to prevent, detect, respond to, resolve and control for attacks trying to manipulate the training data set (data poisoning), or pre-trained components used in training (model poisoning), inputs designed to cause the AI model to make a mistake (adversarial examples or model evasion), confidentiality attacks or model flaws.
TAQSIMA 3
SECTION 3
Obbligi tal-fornituri u tal-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u partijiet oħra
Obligations of providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems and other parties
Artikolu 16
Article 16
Obbligi tal-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli
Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems
Il-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom:
Providers of high-risk AI systems shall:
(a)
jiżguraw li s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tagħhom ikunu konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2;
(a)
ensure that their high-risk AI systems are compliant with the requirements set out in Section 2;
(b)
jindikaw fuq is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli jew, meta dan ma jkunx possibbli, fuq l-imballaġġ tagħha jew id-dokumentazzjoni ta' akkumpanjament tagħha, kif applikabbli, isimhom, l-isem kummerċjali rreġistrat jew it-trademark irreġistrata tagħhom, l-indirizz fejn jistgħu jiġu kkuntattjati;
(b)
indicate on the high-risk AI system or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or its accompanying documentation, as applicable, their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, the address at which they can be contacted;
(c)
ikollhom fis-seħħ sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità li tikkonforma mal-Artikolu 17;
(c)
have a quality management system in place which complies with Article 17;
(d)
iżommu d-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 18;
(d)
keep the documentation referred to in Article 18;
(e)
meta jkunu fil-kontroll tagħhom, iżommu r-reġistri ġġenerati awtomatikament mis-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tagħhom kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 19;
(e)
when under their control, keep the logs automatically generated by their high-risk AI systems as referred to in Article 19;
(f)
jiżguraw li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tgħaddi mill-proċedura rilevanti ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 43, qabel ma tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz;
(f)
ensure that the high-risk AI system undergoes the relevant conformity assessment procedure as referred to in Article 43, prior to its being placed on the market or put into service;
(g)
ifasslu dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE f'konformità mal-Artikolu 47;
(g)
draw up an EU declaration of conformity in accordance with Article 47;
(h)
iwaħħlu l-markatura CE mas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli jew, meta dan ma jkunx possibbli, fuq l-imballaġġ tagħha jew id-dokumentazzjoni li takkumpanjaha, biex tindika l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 48;
(h)
affix the CE marking to the high-risk AI system or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or its accompanying documentation, to indicate conformity with this Regulation, in accordance with Article 48;
(i)
jikkonformaw mal-obbligi tar-reġistrazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 49(1);
(i)
comply with the registration obligations referred to in Article 49(1);
(j)
jieħdu l-azzjonijiet korrettivi meħtieġa u jipprovdu informazzjoni kif meħtieġ fl-Artikolu 20;
(j)
take the necessary corrective actions and provide information as required in Article 20;
(k)
fuq talba motivata ta' awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti, juru l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2;
(k)
upon a reasoned request of a national competent authority, demonstrate the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2;
(l)
jiżguraw li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti ta' aċċessibbiltà f'konformità mad-Direttivi (UE) 2016/2102 u (UE) 2019/882.
(l)
ensure that the high-risk AI system complies with accessibility requirements in accordance with Directives (EU) 2016/2102 and (EU) 2019/882.
Artikolu 17
Article 17
Sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità
Quality management system
1. Il-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jistabbilixxu sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità li tiżgura l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament. Dik is-sistema għandha tiġi dokumentata b'mod sistematiku u ordnat fil-forma ta' politiki, proċeduri u struzzjonijiet bil-miktub, u għandha tinkludi mill-inqas l-aspetti li ġejjin:
1. Providers of high-risk AI systems shall put a quality management system in place that ensures compliance with this Regulation. That system shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions, and shall include at least the following aspects:
(a)
strateġija għall-konformità regolatorja, inkluż il-konformità mal-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità u mal-proċeduri għall-ġestjoni tal-modifiki fis-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(a)
a strategy for regulatory compliance, including compliance with conformity assessment procedures and procedures for the management of modifications to the high-risk AI system;
(b)
it-tekniki, il-proċeduri u l-azzjonijiet sistematiċi li għandhom jintużaw għad-disinn, il-kontroll tad-disinn u l-verifika tad-disinn tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(b)
techniques, procedures and systematic actions to be used for the design, design control and design verification of the high-risk AI system;
(c)
it-tekniki, il-proċeduri u l-azzjonijiet sistematiċi li jridu jintużaw għall-iżvilupp, il-kontroll tal-kwalità u l-garanzija tal-kwalità tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(c)
techniques, procedures and systematic actions to be used for the development, quality control and quality assurance of the high-risk AI system;
(d)
il-proċeduri ta' eżaminazzjoni, ittestjar u validazzjoni li għandhom jitwettqu qabel, waqt u wara l-iżvilupp tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, u l-frekwenza li biha jridu jsiru;
(d)
examination, test and validation procedures to be carried out before, during and after the development of the high-risk AI system, and the frequency with which they have to be carried out;
(e)
l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi, inkluż l-istandards, li għandhom jiġu applikati u, meta l-istandards armonizzati rilevanti ma jiġux applikati b'mod sħiħ, jew ma jkoprux ir-rekwiżiti rilevanti kollha stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, il-mezzi li għandhom jintużaw biex jiġi żgurat li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tikkonforma ma' dawk ir-rekwiżiti;
(e)
technical specifications, including standards, to be applied and, where the relevant harmonised standards are not applied in full or do not cover all of the relevant requirements set out in Section 2, the means to be used to ensure that the high-risk AI system complies with those requirements;
(f)
is-sistemi u l-proċeduri għall-ġestjoni tad-data, inkluż l-akwiżizzjoni tad-data, il-ġbir tad-data, l-analiżi tad-data, it-tikkettar tad-data, il-ħżin tad-data, il-filtrazzjoni tad-data, l-estrazzjoni tad-data, l-aggregazzjoni tad-data, iż-żamma tad-data u kwalunkwe operazzjoni oħra rigward id-data li titwettaq qabel u għall-fini tal-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(f)
systems and procedures for data management, including data acquisition, data collection, data analysis, data labelling, data storage, data filtration, data mining, data aggregation, data retention and any other operation regarding the data that is performed before and for the purpose of the placing on the market or the putting into service of high-risk AI systems;
(g)
is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju msemmija fl-Artikolu 9;
(g)
the risk management system referred to in Article 9;
(h)
l-istabbiliment, l-implimentazzjoni u l-manutenzjoni ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 72;
(h)
the setting-up, implementation and maintenance of a post-market monitoring system, in accordance with Article 72;
(i)
il-proċeduri relatati mar-rappurtar ta' inċident serju f'konformità mal-Artikolu 73;
(i)
procedures related to the reporting of a serious incident in accordance with Article 73;
(j)
it-trattament tal-komunikazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, ma' awtoritajiet rilevanti oħra, inkluż dawk li jipprovdu jew jappoġġaw l-aċċess għad-data, mal-korpi notifikati, ma' operaturi oħra, mal-klijenti jew ma' partijiet interessati oħra;
(j)
the handling of communication with national competent authorities, other relevant authorities, including those providing or supporting the access to data, notified bodies, other operators, customers or other interested parties;
(k)
is-sistemi u l-proċeduri għaż-żamma tar-rekords tad-dokumentazzjoni u l-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha;
(k)
systems and procedures for record-keeping of all relevant documentation and information;
(l)
il-ġestjoni tar-riżorsi, li tinkludi miżuri relatati mas-sigurtà tal-provvista;
(l)
resource management, including security-of-supply related measures;
(m)
qafas ta' responsabbiltà li jistabbilixxi r-responsabbiltajiet tal-maniġment u ta' persunal ieħor fir-rigward tal-aspetti kollha elenkati f'dan il-paragrafu.
(m)
an accountability framework setting out the responsibilities of the management and other staff with regard to all the aspects listed in this paragraph.
2. L-implimentazzjoni tal-aspetti msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tkun proporzjonata għad-daqs tal-organizzazzjoni tal-fornitur. Fi kwalunkwe każ, il-fornituri għandhom jirrispettaw il-grad ta' rigorożità u l-livell ta' protezzjoni meħtieġa biex tiġi żgurata l-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tagħhom ma' dan ir-Regolament.
2. The implementation of the aspects referred to in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate to the size of the provider’s organisation. Providers shall, in any event, respect the degree of rigour and the level of protection required to ensure the compliance of their high-risk AI systems with this Regulation.
3. Fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma soġġetti għal obbligi rigward sistemi ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità jew funzjoni ekwivalenti skont il-liġi settorjali rilevanti tal-Unjoni jistgħu jinkludu l-aspetti elenkati fil-paragrafu 1 bħala parti mis-sistemi ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità skont dik il-liġi.
3. Providers of high-risk AI systems that are subject to obligations regarding quality management systems or an equivalent function under relevant sectoral Union law may include the aspects listed in paragraph 1 as part of the quality management systems pursuant to that law.
4. Għal fornituri li huma istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji soġġetti għal rekwiżiti dwar il-governanza, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi interni tagħhom skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji, l-obbligu li jdaħħlu fis-seħħ sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità bl-eċċezzjoni tal-paragrafu 1, il-punti (g), (h) u (i) ta' dan l-Artikolu għandu jitqies ssodisfat bil-konformità mar-regoli dwar l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi ta' governanza interna skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji. Għal dan il-għan, għandu jitqies kwalunkwe standard armonizzat imsemmi fl-Artikolu 40.
4. For providers that are financial institutions subject to requirements regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law, the obligation to put in place a quality management system, with the exception of paragraph 1, points (g), (h) and (i) of this Article, shall be deemed to be fulfilled by complying with the rules on internal governance arrangements or processes pursuant to the relevant Union financial services law. To that end, any harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 18
Article 18
Żamma tad-dokumentazzjoni
Documentation keeping
1. Il-fornitur għandu, għal perjodu li jintemm 10 snin wara li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkun ġiet introdotta fis-suq jew tqiegħdet fis-servizz, iżomm għad-dispożizzjoni tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti:
1. The provider shall, for a period ending 10 years after the high-risk AI system has been placed on the market or put into service, keep at the disposal of the national competent authorities:
(a)
id-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 11;
(a)
the technical documentation referred to in Article 11;
(b)
id-dokumentazzjoni dwar is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità msemmija fl-Artikolu 17;
(b)
the documentation concerning the quality management system referred to in Article 17;
(c)
id-dokumentazzjoni dwar il-bidliet approvati mill-korpi notifikati meta applikabbli;
(c)
the documentation concerning the changes approved by notified bodies, where applicable;
(d)
id-deċiżjonijiet u dokumenti oħrajn maħruġa mill-korpi notifikati meta applikabbli;
(d)
the decisions and other documents issued by the notified bodies, where applicable;
(e)
id-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47.
(e)
the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47.
2. Kull Stat Membru għandu jiddetermina l-kundizzjonijiet skont liema d-dokumentazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 tibqa' għad-dispożizzjoni tal-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali għall-perjodu indikat f'dak il-paragrafu għall-każijiet meta fornitur jew ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu stabbilit fit-territorju tiegħu jfalli jew iwaqqaf l-attività tiegħu qabel tmiem dak il-perjodu.
2. Each Member State shall determine conditions under which the documentation referred to in paragraph 1 remains at the disposal of the national competent authorities for the period indicated in that paragraph for the cases when a provider or its authorised representative established on its territory goes bankrupt or ceases its activity prior to the end of that period.
3. Fornituri li huma istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji soġġetti għal rekwiżiti rigward il-governanza, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi interni tagħhom skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji għandhom iżommu d-dokumentazzjoni teknika bħala parti mid-dokumentazzjoni miżmuma skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji.
3. Providers that are financial institutions subject to requirements regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law shall maintain the technical documentation as part of the documentation kept under the relevant Union financial services law.
Artikolu 19
Article 19
Reġistri ġġenerati awtomatikament
Automatically generated logs
1. Il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom iżommu r-reġistri msemmija fl-Artikolu 12(1), iġġenerati awtomatikament minn dawk is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, sakemm dawn ir-reġistri jkunu fil-kontroll tagħhom. Mingħajr preġudizzju għal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali applikabbli, ir-reġistri għandhom jinżammu għal perjodu xieraq għall-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, ta' mill-inqas sitt xhur, dment li ma jkunx previst mod ieħor fil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali applikabbli, b'mod partikolari fil-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali.
1. Providers of high-risk AI systems shall keep the logs referred to in Article 12(1), automatically generated by their high-risk AI systems, to the extent such logs are under their control. Without prejudice to applicable Union or national law, the logs shall be kept for a period appropriate to the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system, of at least six months, unless provided otherwise in the applicable Union or national law, in particular in Union law on the protection of personal data.
2. Fornituri li huma istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji soġġetti għal rekwiżiti rigward il-governanza, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi interni tagħhom skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji għandhom iżommu r-reġistri ġġenerati awtomatikament mis-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tagħhom bħala parti mid-dokumentazzjoni miżmuma skont il-liġi rilevanti dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji.
2. Providers that are financial institutions subject to requirements regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law shall maintain the logs automatically generated by their high-risk AI systems as part of the documentation kept under the relevant financial services law.
Artikolu 20
Article 20
Azzjonijiet korrettivi u dmir ta' informazzjoni
Corrective actions and duty of information
1. Il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jqisu jew li jkollhom raġuni biex iqisu li sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkunu introduċew fis-suq jew li jkunu qiegħdu fis-servizz ma tkunx f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament, għandhom minnufih jieħdu l-azzjonijiet korrettivi meħtieġa biex dik is-sistema tinġieb f'konformità, biex ineħħuha, biex jiddiżattivawha, jew biex isejħuha lura, skont il-każ. Dawn għandhom jinfurmaw lid-distributuri tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli kkonċernati u, meta applikabbli, lill-implimentaturi, lir-rappreżentat awtorizzat u lill-importaturi dwar dan.
1. Providers of high-risk AI systems which consider or have reason to consider that a high-risk AI system that they have placed on the market or put into service is not in conformity with this Regulation shall immediately take the necessary corrective actions to bring that system into conformity, to withdraw it, to disable it, or to recall it, as appropriate. They shall inform the distributors of the high-risk AI system concerned and, where applicable, the deployers, the authorised representative and importers accordingly.
2. Meta s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tippreżenta riskju skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 79(1) u l-fornitur isir konxju minn dak ir-riskju, il-fornitur għandu minnufih jinvestiga l-kawżi, f'kollaborazzjoni mal-implimentatur li jirrapporta, meta applikabbli, u jinforma lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq kompetenti għas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli kkonċernata u, fejn applikabbli, lill-korp notifikat li ħareġ ċertifikat għal dik is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-Artikolu 44, b'mod partikolari, dwar in-natura tan-nuqqas ta' konformità u dwar kwalunkwe azzjoni korrettiva meħuda.
2. Where the high-risk AI system presents a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1) and the provider becomes aware of that risk, it shall immediately investigate the causes, in collaboration with the reporting deployer, where applicable, and inform the market surveillance authorities competent for the high-risk AI system concerned and, where applicable, the notified body that issued a certificate for that high-risk AI system in accordance with Article 44, in particular, of the nature of the non-compliance and of any relevant corrective action taken.
Artikolu 21
Article 21
Kooperazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti
Cooperation with competent authorities
1. Il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom, fuq talba motivata minn awtorità kompetenti, jipprovdu lil dik l-awtorità bl-informazzjoni u bid-dokumentazzjoni kollha meħtieġa biex tintwera l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, b'lingwa li tista' tinftiehem faċilment mill-awtorità b'waħda mil-lingwi uffiċjali tal-istituzzjonijiet tal-Unjoni kif indikat mill-Istat Membru kkonċernat.
1. Providers of high-risk AI systems shall, upon a reasoned request by a competent authority, provide that authority all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, in a language which can be easily understood by the authority in one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union as indicated by the Member State concerned.
2. Fuq talba motivata minn awtorità kompetenti, il-fornituri għandhom jagħtu wkoll lill-awtorità kompetenti rikjedenti, kif applikabbli, aċċess għar-reġistri ġġenerati awtomatikament tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Artikolu 12(1), sa fejn dawn ir-reġistri jkunu fil-kontroll tagħhom.
2. Upon a reasoned request by a competent authority, providers shall also give the requesting competent authority, as applicable, access to the automatically generated logs of the high-risk AI system referred to in Article 12(1), to the extent such logs are under their control.
3. Kwalunkwe informazzjoni miksuba minn awtorità kompetenti skont dan l-Artikolu għandha tiġi ttrattata f'konformità mal-obbligi ta' kunfidenzjalità stipulati fl-Artikolu 78.
3. Any information obtained by a competent authority pursuant to this Article shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
Artikolu 22
Article 22
Rappreżentanti awtorizzati tal-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli
Authorised representatives of providers of high-risk AI systems
1. Qabel ma jqiegħdu s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli tagħhom fis-suq tal-Unjoni, il-fornituri stabbiliti f'pajjiżi terzi għandhom, b'mandat bil-miktub, jaħtru rappreżentant awtorizzat li jkun stabbilit fl-Unjoni.
1. Prior to making their high-risk AI systems available on the Union market, providers established in third countries shall, by written mandate, appoint an authorised representative which is established in the Union.
2. Il-fornitur għandu jippermetti lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu jwettaq il-kompiti speċifikati fil-mandat li jirċievi mingħand il-fornitur.
2. The provider shall enable its authorised representative to perform the tasks specified in the mandate received from the provider.
3. Ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu jwettaq il-kompiti speċifikati fil-mandat li jirċievi mingħand il-fornitur. Huwa għandu jipprovdi kopja tal-mandat lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fuq talba, b'waħda mil-lingwi uffiċjali tal-istituzzjonijiet tal-Unjoni, kif indikat mill-awtorità kompetenti. Għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-mandat għandu jagħti s-setgħa lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat biex iwettaq il-kompiti li ġejjin:
3. The authorised representative shall perform the tasks specified in the mandate received from the provider. It shall provide a copy of the mandate to the market surveillance authorities upon request, in one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union, as indicated by the competent authority. For the purposes of this Regulation, the mandate shall empower the authorised representative to carry out the following tasks:
(a)
jivverifika li d-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 u d-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 11 ikunu tfasslu u li l-fornitur ikun wettaq proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità xierqa;
(a)
verify that the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 and the technical documentation referred to in Article 11 have been drawn up and that an appropriate conformity assessment procedure has been carried out by the provider;
(b)
iżomm għad-dispożizzjoni tal-awtoritajiet kompetenti u l-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi nazzjonali msemmija fl-Artikolu 74(10), għal perjodu ta' 10 snin wara li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkun ġiet introdotta fis-suq jew tqiegħdet fis-servizz, id-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur li jkun ħatar ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat, kopja tad-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47, id-dokumentazzjoni teknika u, jekk applikabbli, iċ-ċertifikat maħruġ mill-korp notifikat;
(b)
keep at the disposal of the competent authorities and national authorities or bodies referred to in Article 74(10), for a period of 10 years after the high-risk AI system has been placed on the market or put into service, the contact details of the provider that appointed the authorised representative, a copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47, the technical documentation and, if applicable, the certificate issued by the notified body;
(c)
jipprovdi lil awtorità kompetenti, fuq talba motivata, bl-informazzjoni u bid-dokumentazzjoni kollha, inkluż dak imsemmi fil-punt (b) ta' dan is-subparagrafu, meħtieġa biex turi l-konformità ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, inkluż l-aċċess għar-reġistri, kif imsemmija fl-Artikolu 12(1), iġġenerati awtomatikament mis-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli sal-punt li tali reġistri jkunu fil-kontroll tal-fornitur;
(c)
provide a competent authority, upon a reasoned request, with all the information and documentation, including that referred to in point (b) of this subparagraph, necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, including access to the logs, as referred to in Article 12(1), automatically generated by the high-risk AI system, to the extent such logs are under the control of the provider;
(d)
jikkoopera mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti, fuq talba motivata, f'kull azzjoni li dawn tal-aħħar jieħdu fir-rigward tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, b'mod partikolari biex inaqqsu u jimmitigaw ir-riskji ppreżentati minn sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(d)
cooperate with competent authorities, upon a reasoned request, in any action the latter take in relation to the high-risk AI system, in particular to reduce and mitigate the risks posed by the high-risk AI system;
(e)
meta applikabbli, jikkonforma mal-obbligi ta' reġistrazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 49(1), jew, jekk ir-reġistrazzjoni titwettaq mill-fornitur innifsu, jiżgura li l-informazzjoni msemmija fil-punt 3 tat-Taqsima A tal-Anness VIII tkun korretta.
(e)
where applicable, comply with the registration obligations referred to in Article 49(1), or, if the registration is carried out by the provider itself, ensure that the information referred to in point 3 of Section A of Annex VIII is correct.
Il-mandat għandu jagħti s-setgħa lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat li jiġi indirizzat, flimkien mal-fornitur jew minfloku, mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti, dwar il-kwistjonijiet kollha relatati mal-iżgurar tal-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament.
The mandate shall empower the authorised representative to be addressed, in addition to or instead of the provider, by the competent authorities, on all issues related to ensuring compliance with this Regulation.
4. Ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu jtemm il-mandat jekk iqis jew ikollu raġuni biex iqis li l-fornitur qed jaġixxi kontra l-obbligi tiegħu skont dan ir-Regolament. F'każ bħal dan, għandu jinforma minnufih lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti, kif ukoll, fejn applikabbli, lill-korp notifikat rilevanti, dwar it-terminazzjoni tal-mandat u r-raġunijiet għal dan.
4. The authorised representative shall terminate the mandate if it considers or has reason to consider the provider to be acting contrary to its obligations pursuant to this Regulation. In such a case, it shall immediately inform the relevant market surveillance authority, as well as, where applicable, the relevant notified body, about the termination of the mandate and the reasons therefor.
Artikolu 23
Article 23
Obbligi tal-importaturi
Obligations of importers
1. Qabel ma jintroduċu sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli fis-suq, l-importaturi għandhom jiżguraw li s-sistema tkun f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament billi jivverifikaw li:
1. Before placing a high-risk AI system on the market, importers shall ensure that the system is in conformity with this Regulation by verifying that:
(a)
il-proċedura rilevanti ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità msemmija fl-Artikolu 43 twettqet mill-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli;
(a)
the relevant conformity assessment procedure referred to in Article 43 has been carried out by the provider of the high-risk AI system;
(b)
il-fornitur ikun fassal id-dokumentazzjoni teknika f'konformità mal-Artikolu 11 u l-Anness IV;
(b)
the provider has drawn up the technical documentation in accordance with Article 11 and Annex IV;
(c)
is-sistema jkollha l-markatura CE meħtieġa u tkun akkumpanjata mid-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 u l-istruzzjonijiet tal-użu;
(c)
the system bears the required CE marking and is accompanied by the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 and instructions for use;
(d)
il-fornitur ikun ħatar rappreżentant awtorizzat f'konformità mal-Artikolu 22(1).
(d)
the provider has appointed an authorised representative in accordance with Article 22(1).
2. Meta importatur ikollu raġuni biżżejjed biex iqis li sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli ma tkunx konformi ma' dan ir-Regolament, jew hija ffalsifikata, jew akkumpanjata minn dokumentazzjoni ffalsifikata, dan m'għandux jintroduċi s-sistema fis-suq qabel ma tkun inġiebet f'konformità. Meta s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tippreżenta riskju skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 79(1), l-importatur għandu jinforma lill-fornitur tas-sistema, lir-rappreżentanti awtorizzati u lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq dwar dan.
2. Where an importer has sufficient reason to consider that a high-risk AI system is not in conformity with this Regulation, or is falsified, or accompanied by falsified documentation, it shall not place the system on the market until it has been brought into conformity. Where the high-risk AI system presents a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1), the importer shall inform the provider of the system, the authorised representative and the market surveillance authorities to that effect.
3. L-importaturi għandhom iniżżlu isimhom, l-isem kummerċjali rreġistrat jew it-trademark irreġistrata tagħhom, u l-indirizz li fuqu jistgħu jiġu kkuntattjati dwar is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u fuq l-imballaġġ tagħha jew fid-dokumentazzjoni li takkumpanjaha, fejn applikabbli.
3. Importers shall indicate their name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, and the address at which they can be contacted on the high-risk AI system and on its packaging or its accompanying documentation, where applicable.
4. L-importaturi għandhom jiżguraw li, waqt li sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkun fir-responsabbiltà tagħhom, il-kundizzjonijiet tal-ħżin jew tat-trasport, fejn applikabbli, ma jipperikolawx il-konformità tagħha mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2.
4. Importers shall ensure that, while a high-risk AI system is under their responsibility, storage or transport conditions, where applicable, do not jeopardise its compliance with the requirements set out in Section 2.
5. L-importaturi għandhom iżommu, għal perjodu ta' 10 snin wara li s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkun ġiet introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz, kopja taċ-ċertifikat maħruġ mill-korp notifikat, meta applikabbli, tal-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu u tad-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47.
5. Importers shall keep, for a period of 10 years after the high-risk AI system has been placed on the market or put into service, a copy of the certificate issued by the notified body, where applicable, of the instructions for use, and of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47.
6. L-importaturi għandhom jipprovdu lill-awtoritajiet kompetenti rilevanti, fuq talba motivata, bl-informazzjoni u d-dokumentazzjoni kollha meħtieġa, inkluż dik msemmija fil-paragrafu 5, biex juru l-konformità ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 b'lingwa li tkun tista' tinftiehem faċilment minnhom. Għal dan il-għan, għandhom jiżguraw ukoll li d-dokumentazzjoni teknika tkun tista' titqiegħed għad-dispożizzjoni ta' dawk l-awtoritajiet.
6. Importers shall provide the relevant competent authorities, upon a reasoned request, with all the necessary information and documentation, including that referred to in paragraph 5, to demonstrate the conformity of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2 in a language which can be easily understood by them. For this purpose, they shall also ensure that the technical documentation can be made available to those authorities.
7. L-importaturi għandhom jikkooperaw mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti rilevanti fi kwalunkwe azzjoni li dawk l-awtoritajiet jieħdu fir-rigward ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli introdotta fis-suq mill-importaturi, b'mod partikolari biex inaqqsu u jimmitigaw ir-riskji li din tippreżenta.
7. Importers shall cooperate with the relevant competent authorities in any action those authorities take in relation to a high-risk AI system placed on the market by the importers, in particular to reduce and mitigate the risks posed by it.
Artikolu 24
Article 24
Obbligi tad-distributuri
Obligations of distributors
1. Qabel ma jagħmlu sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli disponibbli fis-suq, id-distributuri għandhom jivverifikaw li jkollha l-markatura CE meħtieġa, li tkun akkumpanjata minn kopja tad-dikjarazzjoni ta' konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 u mill-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu, u li l-fornitur u l-importatur ta’ dik is-sistema, kif applikabbli, ikunu ssodisfaw l-obbligi rispettivi tagħhom kif stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 16, il-punti (b) u (c) u fl-Artikolu 23(3).
1. Before making a high-risk AI system available on the market, distributors shall verify that it bears the required CE marking, that it is accompanied by a copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 and instructions for use, and that the provider and the importer of that system, as applicable, have complied with their respective obligations as laid down in Article 16, points (b) and (c) and Article 23(3).
2. Meta distributur iqis jew ikollu raġuni biex iqis, abbażi tal-informazzjoni fil-pussess tiegħu, li sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli ma tkunx konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, m'għandux jagħmel is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli disponibbli fis-suq sakemm is-sistema tkun inġiebet f'konformità ma' dawk ir-rekwiżiti. Barra minn hekk, meta s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tippreżenta riskju skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 79(1), id-distributur għandu jinforma lill-fornitur jew lill-importatur tas-sistema, kif ikun applikabbli, b'dan.
2. Where a distributor considers or has reason to consider, on the basis of the information in its possession, that a high-risk AI system is not in conformity with the requirements set out in Section 2, it shall not make the high-risk AI system available on the market until the system has been brought into conformity with those requirements. Furthermore, where the high-risk AI system presents a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1), the distributor shall inform the provider or the importer of the system, as applicable, to that effect.
3. Id-distributuri għandhom jiżguraw li, waqt li sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkun fir-responsabbiltà tagħhom, il-kundizzjonijiet tal-ħżin jew tat-trasport, fejn applikabbli, ma jipperikolawx il-konformità tas-sistema mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2.
3. Distributors shall ensure that, while a high-risk AI system is under their responsibility, storage or transport conditions, where applicable, do not jeopardise the compliance of the system with the requirements set out in Section 2.
4. Distributur li jqis jew li jkollu raġuni biex iqis, abbażi tal-informazzjoni fil-pussess tiegħu, li sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jkun għamel disponibbli fis-suq ma tkunx konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, għandu jieħu l-azzjonijiet korrettivi meħtieġa biex iġib dik is-sistema f'konformità ma' dawk ir-rekwiżiti, biex jirtiraha jew isejjaħha lura jew għandu jiżgura li l-fornitur, l-importatur jew kwalunkwe operatur rilevanti, kif xieraq, jieħu dawk l-azzjonijiet korrettivi. Meta s-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tippreżenta riskju skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 79(1), id-distributur għandu jinforma minnufih lill-fornitur jew importatur tas-sistema u lill-awtoritajiet kompetenti għas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli kkonċernata, u jagħti d-dettalji, b'mod partikolari, dwar in-nuqqas ta' konformità u kwalunkwe azzjoni korrettiva meħuda.
4. A distributor that considers or has reason to consider, on the basis of the information in its possession, a high-risk AI system which it has made available on the market not to be in conformity with the requirements set out in Section 2, shall take the corrective actions necessary to bring that system into conformity with those requirements, to withdraw it or recall it, or shall ensure that the provider, the importer or any relevant operator, as appropriate, takes those corrective actions. Where the high-risk AI system presents a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1), the distributor shall immediately inform the provider or importer of the system and the authorities competent for the high-risk AI system concerned, giving details, in particular, of the non-compliance and of any corrective actions taken.
5. Fuq talba motivata minn awtorità kompetenti rilevanti, id-distributuri ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jipprovdu lil dik l-awtorità bl-informazzjoni u bid-dokumentazzjoni kollha neċessarja dwar l-attivitajiet tagħhom skont il-paragrafi 1 sa 4 biex juru l-konformità ta' dik is-sistema mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2.
5. Upon a reasoned request from a relevant competent authority, distributors of a high-risk AI system shall provide that authority with all the information and documentation regarding their actions pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 4 necessary to demonstrate the conformity of that system with the requirements set out in Section 2.
6. Id-distributuri għandhom jikkooperaw mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti rilevanti fi kwalunkwe azzjoni li dawk l-awtoritajiet jieħdu fir-rigward ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli introdotta fis-suq mid-distributuri, b'mod partikolari biex inaqqsu jew jimmitigaw ir-riskju li din tippreżenta.
6. Distributors shall cooperate with the relevant competent authorities in any action those authorities take in relation to a high-risk AI system made available on the market by the distributors, in particular to reduce or mitigate the risk posed by it.
Artikolu 25
Article 25
Responsabbiltajiet tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA
Responsibilities along the AI value chain
1. Kwalunkwe distributur, importatur, implimentatur jew parti terza oħra għandhom jitqiesu bħala fornitur ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament u għandhom ikunu soġġetti għall-obbligi tal-fornitur skont l-Artikolu 16, fi kwalunkwe waħda miċ-ċirkostanzi li ġejjin:
1. Any distributor, importer, deployer or other third-party shall be considered to be a provider of a high-risk AI system for the purposes of this Regulation and shall be subject to the obligations of the provider under Article 16, in any of the following circumstances:
(a)
ipoġġu isimhom jew it-trademark tagħhom fuq sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli diġà introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz, mingħajr preġudizzju għal ftehimiet kuntrattwali li jistipulaw li l-obbligi jiġu allokati b'mod ieħor;
(a)
they put their name or trademark on a high-risk AI system already placed on the market or put into service, without prejudice to contractual arrangements stipulating that the obligations are otherwise allocated;
(b)
jagħmlu modifika sostanzjali f'sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli li tkun diġà ġiet introdotta fis-suq jew diġà tqiegħdet fis-servizz b'tali mod li tibqa' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont l-Artikolu 6;
(b)
they make a substantial modification to a high-risk AI system that has already been placed on the market or has already been put into service in such a way that it remains a high-risk AI system pursuant to Article 6;
(c)
jimmodifikaw l-għan maħsub ta' sistema tal-IA, inkluż sistema tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, li ma tkunx ġiet ikklassifikata bħala ta' riskju għoli u li tkun diġà ġiet introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz b'tali mod li s-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata ssir sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont l-Artikolu 6.
(c)
they modify the intended purpose of an AI system, including a general-purpose AI system, which has not been classified as high-risk and has already been placed on the market or put into service in such a way that the AI system concerned becomes a high-risk AI system in accordance with Article 6.
2. Meta jseħħu ċ-ċirkostanzi msemmijin fil-paragrafu 1, il-fornitur li inizjalment ikun introduċa s-sistema tal-IA fis-suq jew qegħedha fis-servizz m'għandux jibqa' jitqies bħala fornitur ta' dik is-sistema speċifika tal-IA għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament. Dak il-fornitur inizjali għandu jikkoopera mill-qrib ma fornituri ġodda u għandu jagħmel disponibbli l-informazzjoni meħtieġa u jipprovdi l-aċċess tekniku raġonevolment mistenni u assistenza oħra meħtieġa għat-twettiq tal-obbligi stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-konformità mal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli. Dan il-paragrafu m'għandux japplika f'każijiet fejn il-fornitur inizjali jkun speċifika b'mod ċar li s-sistema tal-IA tiegħu m'għandhiex tinbidel f'sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u għalhekk ma taqax taħt l-obbligu li jgħaddi d-dokumentazzjoni.
2. Where the circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 occur, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service shall no longer be considered to be a provider of that specific AI system for the purposes of this Regulation. That initial provider shall closely cooperate with new providers and shall make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular regarding the compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems. This paragraph shall not apply in cases where the initial provider has clearly specified that its AI system is not to be changed into a high-risk AI system and therefore does not fall under the obligation to hand over the documentation.
3. Fil-każ ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma komponenti tas-sikurezza ta' prodotti koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I, il-manifattur tal-prodott għandu jitqies bħala l-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u għandu jkun soġġett għall-obbligi skont l-Artikolu 16 fi kwalunkwe waħda miċ-ċirkostanzi li ġejjin:
3. In the case of high-risk AI systems that are safety components of products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, the product manufacturer shall be considered to be the provider of the high-risk AI system, and shall be subject to the obligations under Article 16 under either of the following circumstances:
(a)
is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tiġi introdotta fis-suq flimkien mal-prodott taħt l-isem jew it-trademark tal-manifattur tal-prodott;
(a)
the high-risk AI system is placed on the market together with the product under the name or trademark of the product manufacturer;
(b)
is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli titqiegħed fis-servizz taħt l-isem jew it-trademark tal-manifattur tal-prodott wara li l-prodott ikun ġie introdott fis-suq.
(b)
the high-risk AI system is put into service under the name or trademark of the product manufacturer after the product has been placed on the market.
4. Il-fornitur ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u l-parti terza li tforni sistema tal-IA, għodod, servizzi, komponenti jew proċessi li jintużaw jew jiġu integrati f'sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom, bi ftehim bil-miktub, jispeċifikaw l-informazzjoni, il-kapaċitajiet u l-aċċess tekniku meħtieġa, u assistenza oħra abbażi tal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku rikonoxxut b'mod ġenerali, sabiex il-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli jkun jista' jikkonforma bis-sħiħ mal-obbligi stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament. Dan il-paragrafu m'għandux japplika għal partijiet terzi li jagħmlu aċċessibbli għall-pubbliku għodod, servizzi, proċessi, jew komponenti li mhumiex mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'liċenzja libera u b’sors miftuħ.
4. The provider of a high-risk AI system and the third party that supplies an AI system, tools, services, components, or processes that are used or integrated in a high-risk AI system shall, by written agreement, specify the necessary information, capabilities, technical access and other assistance based on the generally acknowledged state of the art, in order to enable the provider of the high-risk AI system to fully comply with the obligations set out in this Regulation. This paragraph shall not apply to third parties making accessible to the public tools, services, processes, or components, other than general-purpose AI models, under a free and open-source licence.
L-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jiżviluppa u jirrakkomanda mudelli volontarji ta' termini għal kuntratti bejn il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u l-partijiet terzi li jipprovdu għodod, servizzi, komponenti jew proċessi li jintużaw għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli jew jiġu integrati fihom. Meta jiżviluppa dawk il-mudelli volontarji ta' termini, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jqis ir-rekwiżiti kuntrattwali possibbli applikabbli f'setturi jew każijiet ta' negozju speċifiċi. Il-mudelli volontarji ta' termini kuntrattwali għandhom jiġu ppubblikati u jkunu disponibbli mingħajr ħlas f'format elettroniku li jista' jintuża faċilment.
The AI Office may develop and recommend voluntary model terms for contracts between providers of high-risk AI systems and third parties that supply tools, services, components or processes that are used for or integrated into high-risk AI systems. When developing those voluntary model terms, the AI Office shall take into account possible contractual requirements applicable in specific sectors or business cases. The voluntary model terms shall be published and be available free of charge in an easily usable electronic format.
5. Il-paragrafi 2 u 3 huma mingħajr preġudizzju għall-ħtieġa li jiġu rrispettati u protetti d-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali, l-informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali u s-sigrieti kummerċjali f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni u l-liġi nazzjonali.
5. Paragraphs 2 and 3 are without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights, confidential business information and trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law.
Artikolu 26
Article 26
Obbligi tal-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli
Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
1. L-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom jieħdu miżuri tekniċi u organizzazzjonali xierqa biex jiżguraw li jużaw dawn is-sistemi f'konformità mal-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu li jakkumpanjaw is-sistemi, skont il-paragrafi 3 u 6.
1. Deployers of high-risk AI systems shall take appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure they use such systems in accordance with the instructions for use accompanying the systems, pursuant to paragraphs 3 and 6.
2. L-implimentaturi għandhom jassenjaw sorveljanza mill-bniedem lil persuni fiżiċi li għandhom il-kompetenza, it-taħriġ u l-awtorità meħtieġa, kif ukoll l-appoġġ meħtieġ.
2. Deployers shall assign human oversight to natural persons who have the necessary competence, training and authority, as well as the necessary support.
3. L-obbligi stipulati fil-paragrafi 1 u 2, huma mingħajr preġudizzju għal obbligi oħra tal-implimentatur skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew il-liġi nazzjonali u għal-libertà tal-implimentatur li jorganizza r-riżorsi u l-attivitajiet proprji tiegħu għall-fini tal-implimentazzjoni tal-miżuri tas-sorveljanza mill-bniedem indikati mill-fornitur.
3. The obligations set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, are without prejudice to other deployer obligations under Union or national law and to the deployer’s freedom to organise its own resources and activities for the purpose of implementing the human oversight measures indicated by the provider.
4. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-paragrafi 1 u 2, sa fejn l-implimentatur jeżerċita kontroll fuq id-data tal-input, dak l-implimentatur għandu jiżgura li d-data tal-input tkun rilevanti u rappreżentattiva biżżejjed fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
4. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 and 2, to the extent the deployer exercises control over the input data, that deployer shall ensure that input data is relevant and sufficiently representative in view of the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system.
5. L-implimentaturi għandhom jimmonitorjaw it-tħaddim tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli abbażi tal-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu u, meta rilevanti, jinfurmaw lill-fornituri f'konformità mal-Artikolu 72. Meta l-implimentaturi jkollhom raġuni biex iqisu li l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-istruzzjonijiet jista' jirriżulta f’dik is-sistema tal-IA tippreżenta riskju skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 79(1), huma għandhom, mingħajr dewmien żejjed, jinfurmaw lill-fornitur jew lid-distributur u lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti u għandhom jissospendu l-użu ta' dik is-sistema. Meta l-implimentaturi jkunu identifikaw inċident serju, huma għandhom jinfurmaw minnufih ukoll l-ewwel lill-fornitur, u mbagħad lill-importatur jew lid-distributur u lill-awtoritajiet rilevanti tas-sorveljanza tas-suq dwar dak l-inċident. F'każ li l-implimentatur ma jkunx jista' jikkuntattja lill-fornitur, l-Artikolu 73 għandu japplika mutatis mutandis. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux ikopri data operazzjonali sensittiva tal-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA li huma awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
5. Deployers shall monitor the operation of the high-risk AI system on the basis of the instructions for use and, where relevant, inform providers in accordance with Article 72. Where deployers have reason to consider that the use of the high-risk AI system in accordance with the instructions may result in that AI system presenting a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1), they shall, without undue delay, inform the provider or distributor and the relevant market surveillance authority, and shall suspend the use of that system. Where deployers have identified a serious incident, they shall also immediately inform first the provider, and then the importer or distributor and the relevant market surveillance authorities of that incident. If the deployer is not able to reach the provider, Article 73 shall apply mutatis mutandis. This obligation shall not cover sensitive operational data of deployers of AI systems which are law enforcement authorities.
Għall-implimentaturi li huma istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji soġġetti għal rekwiżiti rigward il-governanza, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi interni tagħhom skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji, l-obbligu ta' monitoraġġ stipulat fl-ewwel subparagrafu għandu jitqies issodisfat billi jiġu konformi mar-regoli dwar l-arranġamenti, il-proċessi u l-mekkaniżmi ta' governanza interna skont il-liġi rilevanti dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji.
For deployers that are financial institutions subject to requirements regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law, the monitoring obligation set out in the first subparagraph shall be deemed to be fulfilled by complying with the rules on internal governance arrangements, processes and mechanisms pursuant to the relevant financial service law.
6. L-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli għandhom iżommu r-reġistri ġġenerati awtomatikament minn dik is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli sa fejn dawn ir-reġistri jkunu fil-kontroll tagħhom għal perjodu xieraq għall-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli, ta' mill-inqas sitt xhur, sakemm ma jkunx previst mod ieħor fil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali applikabbli, b’mod partikolari fil-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali.
6. Deployers of high-risk AI systems shall keep the logs automatically generated by that high-risk AI system to the extent such logs are under their control, for a period appropriate to the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system, of at least six months, unless provided otherwise in applicable Union or national law, in particular in Union law on the protection of personal data.
L-implimentaturi li huma istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji soġġetti għal rekwiżiti rigward il-governanza, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi interni tagħhom skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji għandhom iżommu r-reġistri bħala parti mid-dokumentazzjoni miżmuma skont il-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji.
Deployers that are financial institutions subject to requirements regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law shall maintain the logs as part of the documentation kept pursuant to the relevant Union financial service law.
7. Qabel ma jqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jużaw sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli fuq il-post tax-xogħol, l-implimentaturi li jkunu impjegaturi għandhom jinfurmaw lir-rappreżentanti tal-ħaddiema u lill-ħaddiema affettwati li ser ikunu soġġetti għall-użu tas-sistema tal-AI b’riskju għoli. Din l-informazzjoni għandha tingħata, fejn applikabbli, f’konformità mar-regoli u l-proċeduri stipulati fil-liġi u l-prattika tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali dwar l-informazzjoni tal-ħaddiema u r-rappreżentanti tagħhom.
7. Before putting into service or using a high-risk AI system at the workplace, deployers who are employers shall inform workers’ representatives and the affected workers that they will be subject to the use of the high-risk AI system. This information shall be provided, where applicable, in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down in Union and national law and practice on information of workers and their representatives.
8. L-implimentaturi ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li huma awtoritajiet pubbliċi jew istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni għandhom jikkonformaw mal-obbligi tar-reġistrazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 49. Meta dawn l-implimentaturi jsibu li s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli li beħsiebhom jużaw ma tkunx ġiet irreġistrata fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71, ma għandhomx jużaw dik is-sistema u għandhom jinfurmaw lill-fornitur jew lid-distributur.
8. Deployers of high-risk AI systems that are public authorities, or Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies shall comply with the registration obligations referred to in Article 49. When such deployers find that the high-risk AI system that they envisage using has not been registered in the EU database referred to in Article 71, they shall not use that system and shall inform the provider or the distributor.
9. Fejn applikabbli, l-implimentaturi ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli għandhom jużaw l-informazzjoni pprovduta skont l-Artikolu 13 ta’ dan ir-Regolament biex jikkonformaw mal-obbligu tagħhom li jwettqu valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq il-protezzjoni tad-data skont l-Artikolu 35 tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 jew l-Artikolu 27 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680.
9. Where applicable, deployers of high-risk AI systems shall use the information provided under Article 13 of this Regulation to comply with their obligation to carry out a data protection impact assessment under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2016/680.
10. Mingħajr preġudizzju għad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, fil-qafas ta’ investigazzjoni għat-tfittxija mmirata ta’ persuna ssuspettata jew ikkundannata li wettqet reat kriminali, l-implimentatur ta’ sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f’ħin aktar tard” għandu jitlob awtorizzazzjoni, ex ante, jew mingħajr dewmien żejjed u mhux aktar tard minn 48 siegħa, minn awtorità ġudizzjarja jew awtorità amministrattiva li d-deċiżjoni tagħha tkun vinkolanti u soġġetta għal rieżami ġudizzjarju, għall-użu ta’ dik is-sistema, ħlief meta tintuża għall-identifikazzjoni inizjali ta’ persuna suspettata potenzjali abbażi ta’ fatti oġġettivi u verifikabbli marbuta direttament mar-reat. Kull użu għandu jkun limitat għal dak li huwa strettament meħtieġ għall-investigazzjoni ta’ reat kriminali speċifiku.
10. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2016/680, in the framework of an investigation for the targeted search of a person suspected or convicted of having committed a criminal offence, the deployer of a high-risk AI system for post-remote biometric identification shall request an authorisation, ex ante, or without undue delay and no later than 48 hours, by a judicial authority or an administrative authority whose decision is binding and subject to judicial review, for the use of that system, except when it is used for the initial identification of a potential suspect based on objective and verifiable facts directly linked to the offence. Each use shall be limited to what is strictly necessary for the investigation of a specific criminal offence.
Jekk l-awtorizzazzjoni mitluba skont l-ewwel subparagrafu tiġi rrifjutata, l-użu tas-sistema ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f’ħin aktar tard” marbuta ma’ dik l-awtorizzazzjoni mitluba għandu jitwaqqaf b’effett immedjat u d-data personali marbuta mal-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli li għaliha tkun intalbet l-awtorizzazzjoni għandha titħassar.
If the authorisation requested pursuant to the first subparagraph is rejected, the use of the post-remote biometric identification system linked to that requested authorisation shall be stopped with immediate effect and the personal data linked to the use of the high-risk AI system for which the authorisation was requested shall be deleted.
Tali sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli għall-identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f’ħin aktar tard” fl-ebda każ ma għandha tintuża għal finijiet ta’ infurzar tal-liġi b’mod mhux immirat, mingħajr ebda rabta ma’ reat kriminali, proċediment kriminali, theddida ġenwina u preżenti jew ġenwina u prevedibbli ta’ reat kriminali jew it-tfittxija għal persuna nieqsa speċifika. Għandu jiġi żgurat li l-ebda deċiżjoni li tipproduċi effett legali negattiv fuq persuna ma tista’ tittieħed mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi abbażi biss tal-output ta’ dawn is-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f’ħin aktar tard”.
In no case shall such high-risk AI system for post-remote biometric identification be used for law enforcement purposes in an untargeted way, without any link to a criminal offence, a criminal proceeding, a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a criminal offence, or the search for a specific missing person. It shall be ensured that no decision that produces an adverse legal effect on a person may be taken by the law enforcement authorities based solely on the output of such post-remote biometric identification systems.
Dan il-paragrafu huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għall-Artikolu 9 tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 u l-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 għall-ipproċessar ta’ data bijometrika.
This paragraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 10 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 for the processing of biometric data.
Irrispettivament mill-fini jew mill-implimentatur, kull użu ta’ dawn is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli għandu jiġi ddokumentat fil-fajl rilevanti tal-pulizija u għandu jsir disponibbli għall-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti u għall-awtorità nazzjonali għall-protezzjoni tad-data fuq talba, bl-esklużjoni tad-divulgazzjoni ta’ data operazzjonali sensittiva relatata mal-infurzar tal-liġi. Dan is-subparagrafu għandu jkun mingħajr preġudizzju għas-setgħat mogħtija mid-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji.
Regardless of the purpose or deployer, each use of such high-risk AI systems shall be documented in the relevant police file and shall be made available to the relevant market surveillance authority and the national data protection authority upon request, excluding the disclosure of sensitive operational data related to law enforcement. This subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the powers conferred by Directive (EU) 2016/680 on supervisory authorities.
L-implimentaturi għandhom jippreżentaw rapporti annwali lill-awtoritajiet rilevanti tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u tal-protezzjoni tad-data nazzjonali dwar l-użu tagħhom tas-sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f’ħin aktar tard”, bl-esklużjoni tad-divulgazzjoni ta’ data operazzjonali sensittiva relatata mal-infurzar tal-liġi. Ir-rapporti jistgħu jiġu aggregati biex ikopru iktar minn implimentazzjoni waħda.
Deployers shall submit annual reports to the relevant market surveillance and national data protection authorities on their use of post-remote biometric identification systems, excluding the disclosure of sensitive operational data related to law enforcement. The reports may be aggregated to cover more than one deployment.
L-Istati Membri jistgħu jintroduċu, f’konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni, liġijiet aktar restrittivi dwar l-użu ta’ sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota “f’ħin aktar tard”.
Member States may introduce, in accordance with Union law, more restrictive laws on the use of post-remote biometric identification systems.
11. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-Artikolu 50 ta’ dan ir-Regolament, l-implimentaturi ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III, li jieħdu deċiżjonijiet jew jassistu fit-teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet relatati ma’ persuni fiżiċi, għandhom jinfurmaw lill-persuni fiżiċi li huma soġġetti għall-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli. Għal sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli użati għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, għandu japplika l-Artikolu 13 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680.
11. Without prejudice to Article 50 of this Regulation, deployers of high-risk AI systems referred to in Annex III that make decisions or assist in making decisions related to natural persons shall inform the natural persons that they are subject to the use of the high-risk AI system. For high-risk AI systems used for law enforcement purposes Article 13 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 shall apply.
12. L-implimentaturi għandhom jikkooperaw mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti rilevanti fi kwalunkwe azzjoni li dawk l-awtoritajiet jieħdu fir-rigward ta’ sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli biex jimplimentaw dan ir-Regolament.
12. Deployers shall cooperate with the relevant competent authorities in any action those authorities take in relation to the high-risk AI system in order to implement this Regulation.
Artikolu 27
Article 27
Valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli
Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
1. Qabel l-użu ta’ sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fl-Artikolu 6(2), bl-eċċezzjoni ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli maħsuba biex jintużaw fil-qasam elenkat fl-Anness III, il-punt 2, l-implimentaturi li huma korpi rregolati bil-liġi pubblika jew li huma entitajiet privati li jipprovdu servizzi pubbliċi u implimentaturi ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fil-punti 5, (b) u (c) tal-Anness III, għandhom iwettqu valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali li l-użu ta’ tali sistema jista’ jipproduċi. Għal dak il-għan, l-implimentaturi għandhom iwettqu valutazzjoni li jkun fiha:
1. Prior to deploying a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(2), with the exception of high-risk AI systems intended to be used in the area listed in point 2 of Annex III, deployers that are bodies governed by public law, or are private entities providing public services, and deployers of high-risk AI systems referred to in points 5 (b) and (c) of Annex III, shall perform an assessment of the impact on fundamental rights that the use of such system may produce. For that purpose, deployers shall perform an assessment consisting of:
(a)
deskrizzjoni tal-proċessi tal-implimentatur li fihom ser tintuża s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli skont l-għan maħsub tagħha;
(a)
a description of the deployer’s processes in which the high-risk AI system will be used in line with its intended purpose;
(b)
deskrizzjoni tal-perjodu ta’ żmien li fih ikun maħsub li kull sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli ser tintuża, u l-frekwenza ta’ dan l-użu;
(b)
a description of the period of time within which, and the frequency with which, each high-risk AI system is intended to be used;
(c)
il-kategoriji ta’ persuni u gruppi fiżiċi li aktarx jiġu affettwati mill-użu tagħha fil-kuntest speċifiku;
(c)
the categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected by its use in the specific context;
(d)
ir-riskji speċifiċi ta’ ħsara li x’aktarx ikollhom impatt fuq il-kategoriji ta’ persuni fiżiċi jew gruppi ta’ persuni identifikati skont il-punt (c) ta’ dan il-paragrafu, b’kont meħud tal-informazzjoni mogħtija mill-fornitur skont l-Artikolu 13;
(d)
the specific risks of harm likely to have an impact on the categories of natural persons or groups of persons identified pursuant to point (c) of this paragraph, taking into account the information given by the provider pursuant to Article 13;
(e)
deskrizzjoni tal-implimentazzjoni tal-miżuri ta’ sorveljanza mill-bniedem, skont l-istruzzjonijiet għall-użu;
(e)
a description of the implementation of human oversight measures, according to the instructions for use;
(f)
il-miżuri li għandhom jittieħdu fil-każ tal-materjalizzazzjoni ta’ dawk ir-riskji, inkluż l-arranġamenti għall-governanza interna u l-mekkaniżmi tal-ilmenti.
(f)
the measures to be taken in the case of the materialisation of those risks, including the arrangements for internal governance and complaint mechanisms.
2. L-obbligu stipulat fil-paragrafu 1 japplika għall-ewwel użu tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli. L-implimentatur jista’, f’każijiet simili, jistrieħ fuq valutazzjonijiet tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali mwettqa qabel jew valutazzjonijiet tal-impatt eżistenti mwettqa mill-fornitur. Jekk, matul l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli, l-implimentatur iqis li xi wieħed mill-elementi elenkati fil-paragrafu 1 ikun inbidel jew m’għadux validu, l-implimentatur għandu jieħu l-passi meħtieġa biex jaġġorna l-informazzjoni.
2. The obligation laid down in paragraph 1 applies to the first use of the high-risk AI system. The deployer may, in similar cases, rely on previously conducted fundamental rights impact assessments or existing impact assessments carried out by provider. If, during the use of the high-risk AI system, the deployer considers that any of the elements listed in paragraph 1 has changed or is no longer up to date, the deployer shall take the necessary steps to update the information.
3. Ladarba tkun twettqet il-valutazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, l-implimentatur għandu jinnotifika lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq bir-riżultati tagħha, fejn jippreżenta l-mudell mimli msemmi fil-paragrafu 5 ta’ dan l-Artikolu bħala parti min-notifika. Fil-każ imsemmi fl-Artikolu 46(1), l-implimentaturi jistgħu jiġu eżentati minn dak l-obbligu ta’ notifika.
3. Once the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has been performed, the deployer shall notify the market surveillance authority of its results, submitting the filled-out template referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article as part of the notification. In the case referred to in Article 46(1), deployers may be exempt from that obligation to notify.
4. Jekk diġà tkun saret konformità ma’ xi wieħed mill-obbligi stabbiliti f’dan l-Artikolu ’permezz tal-valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq il-protezzjoni tad-data skont l-Artikolu 35 tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 jew l-Artikolu 27 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, il-valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu għandha tikkomplementa dik il-valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq il-protezzjoni tad-data.
4. If any of the obligations laid down in this Article is already met through the data protection impact assessment conducted pursuant to Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, the fundamental rights impact assessment referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall complement that data protection impact assessment.
5. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jiżviluppa mudell għal kwestjonarju, inkluż permezz ta’ għodda awtomatizzata, biex ikun aktar faċli għall-implimentaturi biex jikkonformaw mal-obbligi tagħhom skont dan l-Artikolu b’mod simplifikat.
5. The AI Office shall develop a template for a questionnaire, including through an automated tool, to facilitate deployers in complying with their obligations under this Article in a simplified manner.
TAQSIMA 4
SECTION 4
Awtoritajiet tan-notifika u korpi notifikati
Notifying authorities and notified bodies
Artikolu 28
Article 28
Awtoritajiet tan-notifika
Notifying authorities
1. Kull Stat Membru għandu jiddeżinja jew jistabbilixxi mill-inqas awtorità tan-notifika waħda responsabbli għall-istabbiliment u għat-twettiq tal-proċeduri meħtieġa għall-valutazzjoni, id-deżinjazzjoni u n-notifika tal-korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità u għall-monitoraġġ tagħhom. Dawk il-proċeduri għandhom jiġu żviluppati b’kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtoritajiet tan-notifika tal-Istati Membri kollha.
1. Each Member State shall designate or establish at least one notifying authority responsible for setting up and carrying out the necessary procedures for the assessment, designation and notification of conformity assessment bodies and for their monitoring. Those procedures shall be developed in cooperation between the notifying authorities of all Member States.
2. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jiddeċiedu li l-valutazzjoni u l-monitoraġġ imsemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandhom jitwettqu minn korp nazzjonali ta’ akkreditazzjoni skont it-tifsira ta’, u f’konformità mar-Regolament (KE) Nru 765/2008 u f’konformità miegħu.
2. Member States may decide that the assessment and monitoring referred to in paragraph 1 is to be carried out by a national accreditation body within the meaning of, and in accordance with, Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
3. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika għandhom ikunu stabbiliti, organizzati u mħaddma b’tali mod li ma jinħoloq l-ebda kunflitt ta’ interess mal-korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, u li l-oġġettività u li l-imparzjalità tal-attivitajiet tagħhom għandhom ikunu salvagwardati.
3. Notifying authorities shall be established, organised and operated in such a way that no conflict of interest arises with conformity assessment bodies, and that the objectivity and impartiality of their activities are safeguarded.
4. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika għandhom ikunu organizzati b’tali mod li kull deċiżjoni relatata man-notifika tal-korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità tittieħed minn persuna kompetenti differenti minn dawk li jkunu għamlu l-valutazzjoni ta’ dawk il-korpi.
4. Notifying authorities shall be organised in such a way that decisions relating to the notification of conformity assessment bodies are taken by competent persons different from those who carried out the assessment of those bodies.
5. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika la għandhom joffru u lanqas jipprovdu xi attivitajiet li jwettqu l-korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità u lanqas xi servizz ta’ konsulenza fuq bażi kummerċjali jew kompetittiva.
5. Notifying authorities shall offer or provide neither any activities that conformity assessment bodies perform, nor any consultancy services on a commercial or competitive basis.
6. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika għandhom jissalvagwardjaw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni li jiksbu, f’konformità mal-Artikolu 78.
6. Notifying authorities shall safeguard the confidentiality of the information that they obtain, in accordance with Article 78.
7. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika għandu jkollhom għadd adegwat ta’ persunal kompetenti għad-dispożizzjoni tagħhom biex jagħmlu x-xogħol tagħhom sewwa. Il-persunal kompetenti għandu jkollu l-kompetenza esperta meħtieġa, fejn applikabbli, għall-funzjoni tiegħu, f’oqsma bħat-teknoloġiji tal-informazzjoni, l-IA u l-liġi, inkluż is-superviżjoni tad-drittijiet fundamentali.
7. Notifying authorities shall have an adequate number of competent personnel at their disposal for the proper performance of their tasks. Competent personnel shall have the necessary expertise, where applicable, for their function, in fields such as information technologies, AI and law, including the supervision of fundamental rights.
Artikolu 29
Article 29
Applikazzjoni ta’ korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità għan-notifika
Application of a conformity assessment body for notification
1. Il-korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità għandhom jippreżentaw applikazzjoni għal notifika lill-awtorità tan-notifika tal-Istat Membru li fih ikunu stabbiliti.
1. Conformity assessment bodies shall submit an application for notification to the notifying authority of the Member State in which they are established.
2. L-applikazzjoni għal notifika għandha tkun akkumpanjata minn deskrizzjoni tal-attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, il-modulu jew il-moduli ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità u t-tipi ta’ sistemi tal-IA li fir-rigward tagħhom il-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità jgħid li huwa kompetenti, kif ukoll minn ċertifikat ta’ akkreditazzjoni, jekk ikun jeżisti wieħed, maħruġ minn korp nazzjonali ta’ akkreditazzjoni li jafferma li l-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stipulati fl-Artikolu 31.
2. The application for notification shall be accompanied by a description of the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment module or modules and the types of AI systems for which the conformity assessment body claims to be competent, as well as by an accreditation certificate, where one exists, issued by a national accreditation body attesting that the conformity assessment body fulfils the requirements laid down in Article 31.
Għandu jiżdied kull dokument validu relatat mad-deżinjazzjonijiet eżistenti tal-korp notifikat applikanti skont kwalunkwe leġiżlazzjoni oħra tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni.
Any valid document related to existing designations of the applicant notified body under any other Union harmonisation legislation shall be added.
3. Meta l-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità kkonċernat ma jkunx jista’ jipprovdi ċertifikat ta’ akkreditazzjoni, dan għandu jipprovdi lill-awtorità tan-notifika l-evidenza dokumentata kollha meħtieġa għall-verifika, ir-rikonoxximent u l-monitoraġġ regolari tal-konformità tiegħu mar-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31.
3. Where the conformity assessment body concerned cannot provide an accreditation certificate, it shall provide the notifying authority with all the documentary evidence necessary for the verification, recognition and regular monitoring of its compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 31.
4. Għall-korpi notifikati deżinjati skont xi leġiżlazzjoni oħra tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni, id-dokumenti u ċ-ċertifikati kollha marbuta ma’ dawk id-deżinjazzjonijiet jistgħu jintużaw biex jappoġġaw il-proċedura tad-deżinjazzjoni tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament, skont il-każ. Il-korp notifikat għandu jaġġorna d-dokumentazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafi 2 u 3 ta’ dan l-Artikolu kull fejn isiru bidliet rilevanti, sabiex l-awtorità responsabbli għall-korpi notifikati tkun tista’ timmonitorja u tivverifika l-konformità kontinwa mar-rekwiżiti kollha stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31.
4. For notified bodies which are designated under any other Union harmonisation legislation, all documents and certificates linked to those designations may be used to support their designation procedure under this Regulation, as appropriate. The notified body shall update the documentation referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article whenever relevant changes occur, in order to enable the authority responsible for notified bodies to monitor and verify continuous compliance with all the requirements laid down in Article 31.
Artikolu 30
Article 30
Proċedura ta’ notifika
Notification procedure
1. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika jistgħu jinnotifikaw biss lil korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità li jkunu ssodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31.
1. Notifying authorities may notify only conformity assessment bodies which have satisfied the requirements laid down in Article 31.
2. L-awtoritajiet tan-notifika għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra permezz tal-għodda ta’ notifika elettronika żviluppata u ġestita mill-Kummissjoni, b’kull korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità msemmi fil-paragrafu 1.
2. Notifying authorities shall notify the Commission and the other Member States, using the electronic notification tool developed and managed by the Commission, of each conformity assessment body referred to in paragraph 1.
3. In-notifika msemmija fil-paragrafu 2 ta’ dan l-Artikolu għandha tinkludi d-dettalji kollha dwar l-attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, il-modulu jew il-moduli ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, it-tipi ta’ sistemi tal-IA ikkonċernat u l-attestazzjoni ta’ kompetenza rilevanti. Meta notifika ma tkunx ibbażata fuq ċertifikat ta’ akkreditazzjoni kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 29(2), l-awtorità tan-notifika għandha tipprovdi lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra l-evidenza dokumentata li tafferma l-kompetenza tal-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità u l-arranġamenti fis-seħħ biex ikun żgurat li dak il-korp ser jiġi monitorjat regolarment u ser ikompli jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31.
3. The notification referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall include full details of the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment module or modules, the types of AI systems concerned, and the relevant attestation of competence. Where a notification is not based on an accreditation certificate as referred to in Article 29(2), the notifying authority shall provide the Commission and the other Member States with documentary evidence which attests to the competence of the conformity assessment body and to the arrangements in place to ensure that that body will be monitored regularly and will continue to satisfy the requirements laid down in Article 31.
4. Il-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità kkonċernat jista’ jwettaq l-attivitajiet ta’ korp notifikat biss meta ma titqajjem l-ebda oġġezzjoni mill-Kummissjoni jew mill-Istati Membri l-oħra fi żmien ġimagħtejn min-notifika minn awtorità tan-notifika meta din tinkludi ċertifikat ta’ akkreditazzjoni msemmi fl-Artikolu 29(2), jew fi żmien xahrejn min-notifika mill-awtorità tan-notifika meta din tinkludi evidenza dokumentarja msemmija fl-Artikolu 29(3).
4. The conformity assessment body concerned may perform the activities of a notified body only where no objections are raised by the Commission or the other Member States within two weeks of a notification by a notifying authority where it includes an accreditation certificate referred to in Article 29(2), or within two months of a notification by the notifying authority where it includes documentary evidence referred to in Article 29(3).
5. Fejn jitressqu oġġezzjonijiet, il-Kummissjoni għandha, mingħajr dewmien, tidħol f’konsultazzjonijiet mal-Istati Membri rilevanti u mal-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità. Fid-dawl ta’ dan, ’’il-Kummissjoni għandha tiddeċiedi jekk l-awtorizzazzjoni hix iġġustifikata. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tindirizza d-deċiżjoni tagħha lill-Istat Membru kkonċernat u lill-korp rilevanti ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità.
5. Where objections are raised, the Commission shall, without delay, enter into consultations with the relevant Member States and the conformity assessment body. In view thereof, the Commission shall decide whether the authorisation is justified. The Commission shall address its decision to the Member State concerned and to the relevant conformity assessment body.
Artikolu 31
Article 31
Rekwiżiti relatati mal-korpi notifikati
Requirements relating to notified bodies
1. Korp notifikat għandu jkun stabbilit skont il-liġi nazzjonali ta’ Stat Membru u għandu jkollu personalità ġuridika.
1. A notified body shall be established under the national law of a Member State and shall have legal personality.
2. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti organizzazzjonali, tal-ġestjoni tal-kwalità, tar-riżorsi u tal-proċessi li huma meħtieġa biex iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom, kif ukoll ir-rekwiżiti taċ-ċibersigurtà adatti.
2. Notified bodies shall satisfy the organisational, quality management, resources and process requirements that are necessary to fulfil their tasks, as well as suitable cybersecurity requirements.
3. L-istruttura organizzazzjonali, l-allokazzjoni tar-responsabbiltajiet, il-linji ġerarkiċi u l-ħidma tal-korpi notifikati għandhom jiżguraw il-fiduċja fil-prestazzjoni tagħhom, u fir-riżultati tal-attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità li l-korpi notifikati jwettqu.
3. The organisational structure, allocation of responsibilities, reporting lines and operation of notified bodies shall ensure confidence in their performance, and in the results of the conformity assessment activities that the notified bodies conduct.
4. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom ikunu indipendenti mill-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli li fir-rigward tagħha jwettqu attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom ikunu indipendenti wkoll minn kwalunkwe operatur ieħor li jkollu interess ekonomiku f’sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli vvalutati, kif ukoll minn kwalunkwe kompetitur tal-fornitur. Dan ma għandux jipprekludi l-użu ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli vvalutati li huma meħtieġa għall-operazzjonijiet tal-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità jew l-użu ta’ tali sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli għal skopijiet personali.
4. Notified bodies shall be independent of the provider of a high-risk AI system in relation to which they perform conformity assessment activities. Notified bodies shall also be independent of any other operator having an economic interest in high-risk AI systems assessed, as well as of any competitors of the provider. This shall not preclude the use of assessed high-risk AI systems that are necessary for the operations of the conformity assessment body, or the use of such high-risk AI systems for personal purposes.
5. La l-korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, il-maniġment superjuri tiegħu u lanqas il-persunal responsabbli għat-twettiq tal-kompiti ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità tiegħu ma għandhom ikunu involuti direttament fid-disinn, fl-iżvilupp, fil-kummerċjalizzazzjoni jew fl-użu ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli, u lanqas ma għandhom jirrappreżentaw lill-partijiet involuti f’dawk l-attivitajiet. Dawn ma għandhom jinvolvu ruħhom fl-ebda attività li tista’ tkun f’kunflitt mal-indipendenza tal-ġudizzju jew l-integrità tagħhom b’rabta mal-attivitajiet tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità li għalihom jiġu notifikati. Dan għandu japplika b’mod partikolari għas-servizzi tal-konsulenza.
5. Neither a conformity assessment body, its top-level management nor the personnel responsible for carrying out its conformity assessment tasks shall be directly involved in the design, development, marketing or use of high-risk AI systems, nor shall they represent the parties engaged in those activities. They shall not engage in any activity that might conflict with their independence of judgement or integrity in relation to conformity assessment activities for which they are notified. This shall, in particular, apply to consultancy services.
6. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom ikunu organizzati u jitħaddmu b’tali mod li jkunu ssalvagwardati l-indipendenza, l-oġġettività u l-imparzjalità tal-attivitajiet tagħhom. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jiddokumentaw u jimplimentaw struttura u proċeduri biex jissalvagwardjaw l-imparzjalità u biex jippromwovu u japplikaw il-prinċipji ta’ imparzjalità fl-organizzazzjoni kollha tagħhom, fost il-persunal tagħhom u fl-attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tagħhom.
6. Notified bodies shall be organised and operated so as to safeguard the independence, objectivity and impartiality of their activities. Notified bodies shall document and implement a structure and procedures to safeguard impartiality and to promote and apply the principles of impartiality throughout their organisation, personnel and assessment activities.
7. Il-korpi notifikati għandu jkollhom fis-seħħ proċeduri dokumentati li jiżguraw li l-persunal, il-kumitati, is-sussidjarji, is-sottokuntratturi tagħhom, u kwalunkwe korp assoċjat jew persunal ta’ korpi esterni jżommu, f’konformità mal-Artikolu 78, il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni li tiġi fil-pussess tagħhom waqt it-twettiq ta’ attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, għajr meta d-divulgazzjoni tagħha tkun meħtieġa bil-liġi. Il-persunal ta’ korpi notifikati għandu jkun marbut li josserva s-segretezza professjonali fir-rigward tal-informazzjoni kollha miksuba waqt li jkun qed iwettaq il-kompiti tiegħu skont dan ir-Regolament, ħlief fir-rigward tal-awtoritajiet tan-notifika tal-Istat Membru li fih ikunu qed isiru l-attivitajiet tiegħu.
7. Notified bodies shall have documented procedures in place ensuring that their personnel, committees, subsidiaries, subcontractors and any associated body or personnel of external bodies maintain, in accordance with Article 78, the confidentiality of the information which comes into their possession during the performance of conformity assessment activities, except when its disclosure is required by law. The staff of notified bodies shall be bound to observe professional secrecy with regard to all information obtained in carrying out their tasks under this Regulation, except in relation to the notifying authorities of the Member State in which their activities are carried out.
8. Il-korpi notifikati għandu jkollhom proċeduri għat-twettiq ta’ attivitajiet li jqisu b’mod dovut id-daqs tal-fornitur, is-settur li fih jopera, l-istruttura tiegħu u l-livell ta’ kumplessità tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata.
8. Notified bodies shall have procedures for the performance of activities which take due account of the size of a provider, the sector in which it operates, its structure, and the degree of complexity of the AI system concerned.
9. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jieħdu assigurazzjoni tar-responsabbiltà xierqa għall-attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità tagħhom, dment li r-responsabbiltà ma tkunx merfugħa mill-Istat Membru li fih ikunu stabbiliti f’konformità mal-liġi nazzjonali jew dment li dak l-Istat Membru ma jkunx hu stess responsabbli direttament għall-valutazzjoni tal-konformità.
9. Notified bodies shall take out appropriate liability insurance for their conformity assessment activities, unless liability is assumed by the Member State in which they are established in accordance with national law or that Member State is itself directly responsible for the conformity assessment.
10. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom ikunu kapaċi jwettqu l-kompiti kollha tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament bl-ogħla livell ta’ integrità professjonali u bil-kompetenza meħtieġa fil-qasam speċifiku, sew jekk dawk il-kompiti jitwettqu mill-korpi notifikati nnifishom jew f’isimhom u taħt ir-responsabbiltà tagħhom.
10. Notified bodies shall be capable of carrying out all their tasks under this Regulation with the highest degree of professional integrity and the requisite competence in the specific field, whether those tasks are carried out by notified bodies themselves or on their behalf and under their responsibility.
11. Il-korpi notifikati għandu jkollhom kompetenzi interni suffiċjenti biex ikunu jistgħu jevalwaw b’mod effettiv il-kompiti mwettqa minn partijiet esterni f’isimhom. Il-korp notifikat għandu jkollu disponibbiltà permanenti ta’ persunal amministrattiv, tekniku, legali u xjentifiku suffiċjenti bl-esperjenza u l-għarfien relatati mat-tipi ta’ sistemi tal-IA, id-data u l-computing tad-data rilevanti, u relatati mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2.
11. Notified bodies shall have sufficient internal competences to be able effectively to evaluate the tasks conducted by external parties on their behalf. The notified body shall have permanent availability of sufficient administrative, technical, legal and scientific personnel who possess experience and knowledge relating to the relevant types of AI systems, data and data computing, and relating to the requirements set out in Section 2.
12. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jieħdu sehem f’attivitajiet ta’ koordinazzjoni kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 38. Dawn għandhom jieħdu sehem ukoll direttament jew ikunu rrappreżentati f’organizzazzjonijiet tal-istandardizzazzjoni Ewropej, jew jiżguraw li jkunu konxji u aġġornati fir-rigward tal-istandards rilevanti.
12. Notified bodies shall participate in coordination activities as referred to in Article 38. They shall also take part directly, or be represented in, European standardisation organisations, or ensure that they are aware and up to date in respect of relevant standards.
Artikolu 32
Article 32
Preżunzjoni ta’ konformità mar-rekwiżiti relatati mal-korpi notifikati
Presumption of conformity with requirements relating to notified bodies
Meta korp ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità juri l-konformità tiegħu mal-kriterji stabbiliti fl-istandards armonizzati rilevanti jew partijiet minnhom, li r-referenzi tagħhom ikunu ġew ippubblikati f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, għandu jkun preżunt li huwa konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fl-Artikolu 31 sa fejn l-istandards armonizzati applikabbli jkopru dawk ir-rekwiżiti.
Where a conformity assessment body demonstrates its conformity with the criteria laid down in the relevant harmonised standards or parts thereof, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, it shall be presumed to comply with the requirements set out in Article 31 in so far as the applicable harmonised standards cover those requirements.
Artikolu 33
Article 33
Sussidjarji ta’ korpi notifikati u sottokuntrattar
Subsidiaries of notified bodies and subcontracting
1. Meta korp notifikat jissottokuntratta kompiti speċifiċi marbuta mal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità jew jirrikorri għal sussidjarja, huwa għandu jiżgura li s-sottokuntrattur jew is-sussidjarja tissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31 u għandu jinforma b’dan lill-awtorità tan-notifika.
1. Where a notified body subcontracts specific tasks connected with the conformity assessment or has recourse to a subsidiary, it shall ensure that the subcontractor or the subsidiary meets the requirements laid down in Article 31, and shall inform the notifying authority accordingly.
2. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jerfgħu responsabbiltà sħiħa għall-kompiti mwettqa minn kwalunkwe sottokuntrattur jew sussidjarja.
2. Notified bodies shall take full responsibility for the tasks performed by any subcontractors or subsidiaries.
3. L-attivitajiet jistgħu jiġu sottokuntrattati jew imwettqa minn sussidjarja bil-qbil tal-fornitur biss. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jagħmlu lista tas-sussidjarji tagħhom disponibbli għall-pubbliku.
3. Activities may be subcontracted or carried out by a subsidiary only with the agreement of the provider. Notified bodies shall make a list of their subsidiaries publicly available.
4. Id-dokumenti rilevanti li jikkonċernaw il-valutazzjoni tal-kwalifiki tas-sottokuntrattur jew tas-sussidjarja u tax-xogħol imwettaq minnhom skont dan ir-Regolament għandhom jinżammu għad-dispożizzjoni tal-awtorità tan-notifika għal perjodu ta’ ħames snin mid-data tat-tmiem tas-sottokuntrattar.
4. The relevant documents concerning the assessment of the qualifications of the subcontractor or the subsidiary and the work carried out by them under this Regulation shall be kept at the disposal of the notifying authority for a period of five years from the termination date of the subcontracting.
Artikolu 34
Article 34
Obbligi operazzjonali tal-korpi notifikati
Operational obligations of notified bodies
1. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jivverifikaw il-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli f’konformità mal-proċeduri ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità stipulati fl-Artikolu 43.
1. Notified bodies shall verify the conformity of high-risk AI systems in accordance with the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 43.
2. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jevitaw piżijiet bla bżonn għall-fornituri meta jwettqu l-attivitajiet tagħhom, u jqisu kif xieraq id-daqs tal-fornitur, is-settur li jopera fih, l-istruttura tiegħu u l-grad ta’ kumplessità tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli kkonċernata, b’mod partikolari bil-ħsieb li jiġu mminimizzati l-piżijiet amministrattivi u l-kostijiet tal-konformità għall-intrapriżi mikro u żgħar skont it-tifsira tar-Rakkomandazzjoni 2003/361/KE. Madankollu, il-korp notifikat għandu jirrispetta l-grad ta’ rigorożità u l-livell ta’ protezzjoni meħtieġa għall-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti ta’ dan ir-Regolament..
2. Notified bodies shall avoid unnecessary burdens for providers when performing their activities, and take due account of the size of the provider, the sector in which it operates, its structure and the degree of complexity of the high-risk AI system concerned, in particular in view of minimising administrative burdens and compliance costs for micro- and small enterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC. The notified body shall, nevertheless, respect the degree of rigour and the level of protection required for the compliance of the high-risk AI system with the requirements of this Regulation.
3. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jagħmlu disponibbli u meta jintalbu, jippreżentaw id-dokumentazzjoni rilevanti kollha, inkluż id-dokumentazzjoni tal-fornituri, lill-awtorità tan-notifika msemmija fl-Artikolu 28 biex dik l-awtorità tkun tista’ twettaq l-attivitajiet tagħha ta’ valutazzjoni, ta’ deżinjazzjoni, ta’ notifika u ta’ monitoraġġ u biex jiffaċilitaw il-valutazzjoni deskritta f’din it-Taqsima.
3. Notified bodies shall make available and submit upon request all relevant documentation, including the providers’ documentation, to the notifying authority referred to in Article 28 to allow that authority to conduct its assessment, designation, notification and monitoring activities, and to facilitate the assessment outlined in this Section.
Artikolu 35
Article 35
Numri tal-identifikazzjoni u listi tal-korpi notifikati
Identification numbers and lists of notified bodies
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tassenja numru ta’ identifikazzjoni uniku lil kull korp notifikat, anke meta korp ikun notifikat taħt aktar minn att wieħed tal-Unjoni.
1. The Commission shall assign a single identification number to each notified body, even where a body is notified under more than one Union act.
2. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tqiegħed il-lista tal-korpi notifikati skont dan ir-Regolament għad-dispożizzjoni tal-pubbliku, inkluż in-numri tal-identifikazzjoni tagħhom u l-attivitajiet li għalihom ikunu ġew notifikati. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżgura li l-lista tinżamm aġġornata.
2. The Commission shall make publicly available the list of the bodies notified under this Regulation, including their identification numbers and the activities for which they have been notified. The Commission shall ensure that the list is kept up to date.
Artikolu 36
Article 36
Bidliet fin-notifiki
Changes to notifications
1. L-awtorità tan-notifika għandha tinnotifika lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra bi kwalunkwe bidla rilevanti fin-notifika ta’ korp notifikat permezz tal-għodda elettronika ta’ notifika msemmija fl-Artikolu 30(2).
1. The notifying authority shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of any relevant changes to the notification of a notified body via the electronic notification tool referred to in Article 30(2).
2. Il-proċeduri stabbiliti fl-Artikoli 29 u 30 għandhom japplikaw għal estensjonijiet tal-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni tan-notifika.
2. The procedures laid down in Articles 29 and 30 shall apply to extensions of the scope of the notification.
Għal bidliet għan-notifika minbarra estensjonijiet tal-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni tagħha, għandhom japplikaw il-proċeduri stipulati fil-paragrafi (3) sa (9).
For changes to the notification other than extensions of its scope, the procedures laid down in paragraphs (3) to (9) shall apply.
3. Fejn korp notifikat jiddeċiedi li jtemm l-attivitajiet tiegħu ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità, huwa għandu jinforma lill-awtorità tan-notifika u lill-fornituri kkonċernati malajr kemm jista’ jkun u fil-każ ta’ tmiem ippjanat mill-inqas sena qabel ma jtemm l-attivitajiet tiegħu. Iċ-ċertifikati tal-korp notifikat jistgħu jibqgħu validi għal perjodu ta’ disa’ xhur wara t-tmiem tal-attivitajiet tal-korp notifikat bil-kundizzjoni li korp notifikat ieħor ikun ikkonferma bil-miktub li ser jieħu r-responsabbiltà għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli koperti minn dawk iċ-ċertifikati. Il-korp notifikat tal-aħħar għandu jlesti valutazzjoni sħiħa tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli affettwati sa tmiem dak il-perjodu ta’ disa’ xhur qabel ma joħroġ ċertifikati ġodda għal dawk is-sistemi. Fejn il-korp notifikat ikun waqqaf l-attività tiegħu, l-awtorità tan-notifika għandha tirtira d-deżinjazzjoni.
3. Where a notified body decides to cease its conformity assessment activities, it shall inform the notifying authority and the providers concerned as soon as possible and, in the case of a planned cessation, at least one year before ceasing its activities. The certificates of the notified body may remain valid for a period of nine months after cessation of the notified body’s activities, on condition that another notified body has confirmed in writing that it will assume responsibilities for the high-risk AI systems covered by those certificates. The latter notified body shall complete a full assessment of the high-risk AI systems affected by the end of that nine-month-period before issuing new certificates for those systems. Where the notified body has ceased its activity, the notifying authority shall withdraw the designation.
4. Meta awtorità tan-notifika jkollha raġuni biżżejjed biex tqis li korp notifikat m’għadux jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31, jew li qed jonqos milli jissodisfa l-obbligi tiegħu, l-awtorità tan-notifika għandha, mingħajr dewmien, tinvestiga l-kwistjoni bl-akbar diliġenza possibbli. F’dak il-kuntest, hija għandha tinforma lill-korp notifikat ikkonċernat dwar l-oġġezzjonijiet imqajmin u tagħtih il-possibbiltà li jaqsam il-fehmiet tiegħu. Jekk l-awtorità tan-notifika tasal għall-konklużjoni li l-korp notifikat m’għadux jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31 jew li qed jonqos milli jissodisfa l-obbligi tiegħu, dan għandu jirrestrinġi, jissospendi jew jirtira d-deżinjazzjoni, kif xieraq, skont is-serjetà tan-nuqqas milli jissodisfa dawk ir-rekwiżiti jew dawk l-obbligi. Din għandha minnufih tinforma lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra dwar dan.
4. Where a notifying authority has sufficient reason to consider that a notified body no longer meets the requirements laid down in Article 31, or that it is failing to fulfil its obligations, the notifying authority shall without delay investigate the matter with the utmost diligence. In that context, it shall inform the notified body concerned about the objections raised and give it the possibility to make its views known. If the notifying authority comes to the conclusion that the notified body no longer meets the requirements laid down in Article 31 or that it is failing to fulfil its obligations, it shall restrict, suspend or withdraw the designation as appropriate, depending on the seriousness of the failure to meet those requirements or fulfil those obligations. It shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States accordingly.
5. Meta d-deżinjazzjoni tiegħu tkun ġiet sospiża, ristretta, jew irtirata kompletament jew parzjalment, il-korp notifikat għandu jinforma lill-fornituri kkonċernati fi żmien 10 ijiem.
5. Where its designation has been suspended, restricted, or fully or partially withdrawn, the notified body shall inform the providers concerned within 10 days.
6. Fil-każ tar-restrizzjoni, is-sospensjoni jew l-irtirar ta’ deżinjazzjoni, l-awtorità tan-notifika għandha tieħu passi xierqa biex tiżgura li l-fajls tal-korp notifikat ikkonċernat jinżammu u li jitqiegħdu għad-dispożizzjoni tal-awtoritajiet tan-notifika fi Stati Membri oħra u tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fuq talba tagħhom.
6. In the event of the restriction, suspension or withdrawal of a designation, the notifying authority shall take appropriate steps to ensure that the files of the notified body concerned are kept, and to make them available to notifying authorities in other Member States and to market surveillance authorities at their request.
7. Fil-każ ta’ restrizzjoni, sospensjoni jew irtirar ta’ deżinjazzjoni, l-awtorità tan-notifika għandha:
7. In the event of the restriction, suspension or withdrawal of a designation, the notifying authority shall:
(a)
tivvaluta l-impatt fuq iċ-ċertifikati maħruġa mill-korp notifikat;
(a)
assess the impact on the certificates issued by the notified body;
(b)
tippreżenta rapport dwar is-sejbiet tagħha lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra fi żmien tliet xhur minn meta tkun innotifikat dwar il-bidliet fid-deżinjazzjoni;
(b)
submit a report on its findings to the Commission and the other Member States within three months of having notified the changes to the designation;
(c)
titlob lill-korp notifikat jissospendi jew jirtira, f’perjodu ta’ żmien raġonevoli determinat mill-awtorità, kwalunkwe ċertifikat maħruġ bi żball sabiex tkun żgurata l-konformità kontinwa tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli fis-suq;
(c)
require the notified body to suspend or withdraw, within a reasonable period of time determined by the authority, any certificates which were unduly issued, in order to ensure the continuing conformity of high-risk AI systems on the market;
(d)
tinforma lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri dwar ċertifikati li tkun talbet is-sospensjoni jew l-irtirar tagħhom;
(d)
inform the Commission and the Member States about certificates the suspension or withdrawal of which it has required;
(e)
tipprovdi lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti tal-Istat Membru li fih il-fornitur ikollu l-post tan-negozju rreġistrat tiegħu bl-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha dwar iċ-ċertifikati li għalihom tkun talbet is-sospensjoni jew l-irtirar; dik l-awtorità għandha tieħu l-miżuri xierqa, fejn meħtieġ, biex jiġi evitat riskju potenzjali għas-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew id-drittijiet fundamentali.
(e)
provide the national competent authorities of the Member State in which the provider has its registered place of business with all relevant information about the certificates of which it has required the suspension or withdrawal; that authority shall take the appropriate measures, where necessary, to avoid a potential risk to health, safety or fundamental rights.
8. Bl-eċċezzjoni ta’ ċertifikati maħruġa bi żball, u fejn deżinjazzjoni tkun ġiet sospiża jew ristretta, iċ-ċertifikati għandhom jibqgħu validi f’waħda miċ-ċirkostanzi li ġejjin:
8. With the exception of certificates unduly issued, and where a designation has been suspended or restricted, the certificates shall remain valid in one of the following circumstances:
(a)
l-awtorità tan-notifika tkun ikkonfermat, fi żmien xahar mis-sospensjoni jew ir-restrizzjoni, li ma hemm l-ebda riskju għas-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew id-drittijiet fundamentali b’rabta ma’ ċertifikati milquta mis-sospensjoni jew ir-restrizzjoni, u l-awtorità tan-notifika tkun fasslet skeda ta’ żmien għal azzjonijiet biex tiġi rimedjata s-sospensjoni jew ir-restrizzjoni; jew
(a)
the notifying authority has confirmed, within one month of the suspension or restriction, that there is no risk to health, safety or fundamental rights in relation to certificates affected by the suspension or restriction, and the notifying authority has outlined a timeline for actions to remedy the suspension or restriction; or
(b)
l-awtorità tan-notifika tkun ikkonfermat li mhu ser jinħareġ, jiġi emendat jew jinħareġ mill-ġdid l-ebda ċertifikat rilevanti għas-sospensjoni matul is-sospensjoni jew ir-restrizzjoni, u tgħid jekk il-korp notifikat għandux il-kapaċità li jkompli jimmonitorja u jibqa’ responsabbli miċ-ċertifikati eżistenti maħruġa għall-perjodu tas-sospensjoni jew ir-restrizzjoni; fil-każ li l-awtorità tan-notifika tiddetermina li l-korp notifikat ma għandux il-kapaċità li jappoġġa ċ-ċertifikati eżistenti maħruġa, il-fornitur tas-sistema koperta miċ-ċertifikat għandu jikkonferma bil-miktub lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti tal-Istat Membru li fih ikollu l-post tan-negozju rreġistrat tiegħu, fi żmien tliet xhur mis-sospensjoni jew mir-restrizzjoni, li korp notifikat kwalifikat ieħor qed jassumi temporanjament il-funzjonijiet tal-korp notifikat biex jimmonitorja u jibqa’ responsabbli għaċ-ċertifikati matul il-perjodu ta’ sospensjoni jew restrizzjoni.
(b)
the notifying authority has confirmed that no certificates relevant to the suspension will be issued, amended or re-issued during the course of the suspension or restriction, and states whether the notified body has the capability of continuing to monitor and remain responsible for existing certificates issued for the period of the suspension or restriction; in the event that the notifying authority determines that the notified body does not have the capability to support existing certificates issued, the provider of the system covered by the certificate shall confirm in writing to the national competent authorities of the Member State in which it has its registered place of business, within three months of the suspension or restriction, that another qualified notified body is temporarily assuming the functions of the notified body to monitor and remain responsible for the certificates during the period of suspension or restriction.
9. Bl-eċċezzjoni ta’ ċertifikati li jkunu nħarġu bi żball, u meta deżinjazzjoni tkun ġiet irtirata, iċ-ċertifikati għandhom jibqgħu validi għal perjodu ta’ disa’ xhur fiċ-ċirkostanzi li ġejjin:
9. With the exception of certificates unduly issued, and where a designation has been withdrawn, the certificates shall remain valid for a period of nine months under the following circumstances:
(a)
l-awtorità kompetenti nazzjonali tal-Istat Membru li fih il-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli kopert miċ-ċertifikat ikollu l-post tan-negozju rreġistrat tiegħu tkun ikkonfermat li ma hemm l-ebda riskju għas-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew d-drittijiet fundamentali assoċjati mas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli kkonċernati; u
(a)
the national competent authority of the Member State in which the provider of the high-risk AI system covered by the certificate has its registered place of business has confirmed that there is no risk to health, safety or fundamental rights associated with the high-risk AI systems concerned; and
(b)
korp notifikat ieħor ikun ikkonferma bil-miktub li ser jassumi minnufih ir-’responsabbiltà għal dawk is-sistemi tal-IA u jlesti l-valutazzjoni tiegħu fi żmien 12-il xahar mill-irtirar tad-deżinjazzjoni.
(b)
another notified body has confirmed in writing that it will assume immediate responsibility for those AI systems and completes its assessment within 12 months of the withdrawal of the designation.
Fiċ-ċirkostanzi msemmija fl-ewwel subparagrafu, l-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti tal-Istat Membru li fih il-fornitur tas-sistema kopert miċ-ċertifikat għandu l-post tan-negozju tiegħu tista’ testendi l-validità proviżorja taċ-ċertifikati għal perjodi addizzjonali ta’ tliet xhur, li b’kollox ma għandhomx jaqbżu t-12-il xahar.
In the circumstances referred to in the first subparagraph, the national competent authority of the Member State in which the provider of the system covered by the certificate has its place of business may extend the provisional validity of the certificates for additional periods of three months, which shall not exceed 12 months in total.
L-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti jew il-korp notifikat li jassumi l-funzjonijiet tal-korp notifikat milqut mill-bidliet fid-deżinjazzjoni, għandu minnufih jinforma b’dan lill-Kummissjoni, lill-Istati Membri l-oħra u lill-korpi notifikati l-oħra.
The national competent authority or the notified body assuming the functions of the notified body affected by the change of designation shall immediately inform the Commission, the other Member States and the other notified bodies thereof.
Artikolu 37
Article 37
Kontestazzjoni tal-kompetenza tal-korpi notifikati
Challenge to the competence of notified bodies
1. Fejn meħtieġ, il-Kummissjoni għandha tinvestiga l-każijiet kollha meta jkun hemm raġunijiet biex tiġi ddubitata l-kompetenza ta’ korp notifikat jew jekk korp notifikat ikunx għadu jissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 31 u r-responsabbiltajiet applikabbli tiegħu.
1. The Commission shall, where necessary, investigate all cases where there are reasons to doubt the competence of a notified body or the continued fulfilment by a notified body of the requirements laid down in Article 31 and of its applicable responsibilities.
2. L-awtorità tan-notifika għandha tipprovdi lill-Kummissjoni, fuq talba, l-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha dwar in-notifika jew iż-żamma tal-kompetenza tal-korp notifikat ikkonċernat.
2. The notifying authority shall provide the Commission, on request, with all relevant information relating to the notification or the maintenance of the competence of the notified body concerned.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżgura li l-informazzjoni sensittiva kollha miksuba matul l-investigazzjonijiet tagħha skont dan l-Artikolu tiġi ttrattata b’mod kunfidenzjali f’konformità mal-Artikolu 78.
3. The Commission shall ensure that all sensitive information obtained in the course of its investigations pursuant to this Article is treated confidentially in accordance with Article 78.
4. Meta l-Kummissjoni taċċerta ruħha li korp notifikat ma jissodisfax, jew li ma jkunx għadu jissodisfa, ir-rekwiżiti għan-notifika tiegħu, hija għandha tinforma lill-Istat Membru tan-notifika b’dan u titolbu jieħu l-miżuri korrettivi meħtieġa, inkluż is-sospensjoni jew l-irtirar tan-notifika, jekk ikun meħtieġ. Meta l-Istat Membru jonqos milli jieħu l-miżuri korrettivi meħtieġa, il-Kummissjoni tista’, permezz ta’ att ta’ implimentazzjoni, tissospendi, tirrestrinġi jew tirtira d-deżinjazzjoni. Dak l-att ta’ implimentazzjoni għandu jiġi adottat f’konformità mal-proċedura ta’ eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
4. Where the Commission ascertains that a notified body does not meet or no longer meets the requirements for its notification, it shall inform the notifying Member State accordingly and request it to take the necessary corrective measures, including the suspension or withdrawal of the notification if necessary. Where the Member State fails to take the necessary corrective measures, the Commission may, by means of an implementing act, suspend, restrict or withdraw the designation. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
Artikolu 38
Article 38
Koordinazzjoni tal-korpi notifikati
Coordination of notified bodies
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżgura li, fir-rigward ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli, jiġu stabbiliti koordinazzjoni u kooperazzjoni xierqa bejn il-korpi notifikati attivi fil-proċeduri ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità skont dan ir-Regolament u li dawn jitħaddmu kif xieraq fil-forma ta’ grupp settorjali ta’ korpi notifikati.
1. The Commission shall ensure that, with regard to high-risk AI systems, appropriate coordination and cooperation between notified bodies active in the conformity assessment procedures pursuant to this Regulation are put in place and properly operated in the form of a sectoral group of notified bodies.
2. Kull awtorità tan-notifika għandha tiżgura li l-korpi notifikati minnha jieħdu sehem fil-ħidma ta’ grupp imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1, b’mod dirett jew permezz ta’ rappreżentanti deżinjati.
2. Each notifying authority shall ensure that the bodies notified by it participate in the work of a group referred to in paragraph 1, directly or through designated representatives.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tipprevedi l-iskambju tal-għarfien u l-aħjar prattiki bejn l-awtoritajiet tan-notifika.
3. The Commission shall provide for the exchange of knowledge and best practices between notifying authorities.
Artikolu 39
Article 39
Korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn pajjiżi terzi
Conformity assessment bodies of third countries
Il-korpi ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità stabbiliti skont il-liġi ta’ pajjiż terz li miegħu l-Unjoni tkun ikkonkludiet ftehim jistgħu jiġu awtorizzati biex iwettqu l-attivitajiet tal-korpi notifikati skont dan ir-Regolament, dment li dawn jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti stipulati fl-Artikolu 31, jew jiżguraw livell ekwivalenti ta’ konformità.
Conformity assessment bodies established under the law of a third country with which the Union has concluded an agreement may be authorised to carry out the activities of notified bodies under this Regulation, provided that they meet the requirements laid down in Article 31 or they ensure an equivalent level of compliance.
TAQSIMA 5
SECTION 5
Standards, valutazzjoni tal-konformità, ċertifikati, reġistrazzjoni
Standards, conformity assessment, certificates, registration
Artikolu 40
Article 40
Standards armonizzati u strumenti ta’ standardizzazzjoni
Harmonised standards and standardisation deliverables
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli jew il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jkunu konformi ma’ standards armonizzati jew ma’ partijiet minnhom, li r-referenzi tagħhom ikunu ġew ippubblikati f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea f’konformità mar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012 għandhom ikunu preżunti li huma konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu jew, kif applikabbli, mal-obbligi stipulati fl-Kapitolu V, it-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 ta’ dan ir-Regolament, sa fejn dawk l-istandards ikopru dawk ir-rekwiżiti jew obbligi.
1. High-risk AI systems or general-purpose AI models which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter or, as applicable, with the obligations set out in of Chapter V, Sections 2 and 3, of this Regulation, to the extent that those standards cover those requirements or obligations.
2. F’konformità mal-Artikolu 10 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012, il-Kummissjoni għandha toħroġ, mingħajr dewmien żejjed, talbiet għall-istandardizzazzjoni li jkopru r-rekwiżiti kollha stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu u, kif applikabbli, talbiet għall-istandardizzazzjoni li jkopru l-obbligi stipulati fil-Kapitolu V, it-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 ta’ dan ir-Regolament’. It-talba ta’ standardizzazzjoni għandha titlob ukoll strumenti għall-proċessi ta’ rappurtar u ta’ dokumentazzjoni biex tittejjeb il-prestazzjoni tar-riżorsi tas-sistemi tal-IA, bħat-tnaqqis fil-konsum tal-enerġija u ta’ riżorsi oħra tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli matul iċ-ċiklu tal-ħajja tagħha, u dwar l-iżvilupp tal-effiċjenza fl-użu tal-enerġija tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali. Meta tħejji talba ta’ standardizzazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta lill-Bord u lill-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti, inkluż il-forum konsultattiv.
2. In accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, the Commission shall issue, without undue delay, standardisation requests covering all requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter and, as applicable, standardisation requests covering obligations set out in Chapter V, Sections 2 and 3, of this Regulation. The standardisation request shall also ask for deliverables on reporting and documentation processes to improve AI systems’ resource performance, such as reducing the high-risk AI system’s consumption of energy and of other resources during its lifecycle, and on the energy-efficient development of general-purpose AI models. When preparing a standardisation request, the Commission shall consult the Board and relevant stakeholders, including the advisory forum.
Meta toħroġ talba ta’ standardizzazzjoni lill-organizzazzjonijiet Ewropej tal-istandardizzazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tispeċifika li l-istandards iridu jkunu ċari, konsistenti, inkluż mal-istandards żviluppati fid-diversi setturi għall-prodotti koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni eżistenti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I, u bil-għan li jiżguraw li s-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli jew il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz fl-Unjoni jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti rilevanti jew l-obbligi stabbiliti f’dan ir-Regolament.
When issuing a standardisation request to European standardisation organisations, the Commission shall specify that standards have to be clear, consistent, including with the standards developed in the various sectors for products covered by the existing Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I, and aiming to ensure that high-risk AI systems or general-purpose AI models placed on the market or put into service in the Union meet the relevant requirements or obligations laid down in this Regulation.
Il-Kummissjoni għandha titlob lill-organizzazzjonijiet Ewropej tal-istandardizzazzjoni biex jipprovdu evidenza tal-aħjar sforzi tagħhom biex jissodisfaw l-objettivi msemmija fl-ewwel u t-tieni subparagrafu ta’ dan il-paragrafu f’konformità mal-Artikolu 24 tar-Regolament (UE) 1025/2012.
The Commission shall request the European standardisation organisations to provide evidence of their best efforts to fulfil the objectives referred to in the first and the second subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.
3. Il-parteċipanti fil-proċess ta’ standardizzazzjoni għandhom ifittxu li jippromwovu l-investiment u l-innovazzjoni fl-IA, inkluż permezz ta’ żieda fiċ-ċertezza legali, kif ukoll il-kompetittività u t-tkabbir tas-suq tal-Unjoni, li jikkontribwixxu għat-tisħiħ tal-kooperazzjoni globali dwar l-istandardizzazzjoni u filwaqt li jqisu l-istandards internazzjonali eżistenti fil-qasam tal-IA li huma konsistenti mal-valuri, id-drittijiet fundamentali u l-interessi tal-Unjoni, u li jtejbu l-governanza b’diversi partijiet ikkonċernati li tiżgura rappreżentanza bbilanċjata tal-interessi u l-parteċipazzjoni effettiva tal-partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti kollha f’konformità mal-Artikoli 5, 6 u 7 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012.
3. The participants in the standardisation process shall seek to promote investment and innovation in AI, including through increasing legal certainty, as well as the competitiveness and growth of the Union market, to contribute to strengthening global cooperation on standardisation and taking into account existing international standards in the field of AI that are consistent with Union values, fundamental rights and interests, and to enhance multi-stakeholder governance ensuring a balanced representation of interests and the effective participation of all relevant stakeholders in accordance with Articles 5, 6, and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.
Artikolu 41
Article 41
Speċifikazzjonijiet komuni
Common specifications
1. Il-Kummissjoni tista’ tadotta atti ta’ implimentazzjoni li jistabbilixxu speċifikazzjonijiet komuni għar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu jew, kif applikabbli, għall-obbligi stipulati fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V meta jkunu ġew issodisfati l-kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin:
1. The Commission may adopt, implementing acts establishing common specifications for the requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter or, as applicable, for the obligations set out in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V where the following conditions have been fulfilled:
(a)
il-Kummissjoni tkun talbet, skont l-Artikolu 10(1) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012, organizzazzjoni Ewropea tal-istandardizzazzjoni waħda jew aktar biex tabbozza standard armonizzat għar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu, jew, kif applikabbli, għall-obbligi stipulati fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V, u:
(a)
the Commission has requested, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, one or more European standardisation organisations to draft a harmonised standard for the requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter, or, as applicable, for the obligations set out in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V, and:
(i)
it-talba ma tkunx ġiet aċċettata minn ebda waħda mill-organizzazzjonijiet Ewropej tal-istandardizzazzjoni; jew
(i)
the request has not been accepted by any of the European standardisation organisations; or
(ii)
l-istandards armonizzati li jindirizzaw dik it-talba ma jkunux tfasslu sal-iskadenza stipulata f’konformità mal-Artikolu 10(1) tar-Regolament (UE) 1025/2012; jew
(ii)
the harmonised standards addressing that request are not delivered within the deadline set in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012; or
(iii)
l-istandards armonizzati rilevanti ma jindirizzawx biżżejjed it-tħassib dwar id-drittijiet fundamentali; jew
(iii)
the relevant harmonised standards insufficiently address fundamental rights concerns; or
(iv)
l-istandards armonizzati ma jkunux konformi mat-talba; u
(iv)
the harmonised standards do not comply with the request; and
(b)
ma tkun ġiet ippubblikata l-ebda referenza għall-istandards armonizzati li jkopru r-rekwiżiti msemmija fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu jew, kif applikabbli, l-obbligi msemmija fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V, f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea f’konformità mar-Regolament (UE) 1025/2012 u l-ebda referenza bħal din ma tkun mistennija li tiġi ppubblikata fi żmien raġonevoli.
(b)
no reference to harmonised standards covering the requirements referred to in Section 2 of this Chapter or, as applicable, the obligations referred to in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, and no such reference is expected to be published within a reasonable period.
Meta tabbozza l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta lill-forum konsultattiv imsemmi fl-Artikolu 67.
When drafting the common specifications, the Commission shall consult the advisory forum referred to in Article 67.
L-atti ta’ implimentazzjoni msemmija fl-ewwel subparagrafu ta’ dan il-paragrafu għandhom jiġu adottati f’konformità mal-proċedura ta’ eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
The implementing acts referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
2. Qabel ma tħejji abbozz ta’ att ta’ implimentazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tinforma lill-kumitat imsemmi fl-Artikolu 22 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012 li hija tqis il-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu li għandhom jiġu sodisfati.
2. Before preparing a draft implementing act, the Commission shall inform the committee referred to in Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 that it considers the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article to be fulfilled.
3. Is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli jew il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jkunu konformi mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmijin fil-paragrafu 1, jew partijiet minn dawk l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet, għandhom jiġu preżunti li huma konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu jew, kif applikabbli, li huma konformi mal-obbligi msemmija fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V, sa fejn dawk l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni jkopru dawk ir-rekwiżiti jew dawk l-obbligi.
3. High-risk AI systems or general-purpose AI models which are in conformity with the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, or parts of those specifications, shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter or, as applicable, to comply with the obligations referred to in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V, to the extent those common specifications cover those requirements or those obligations.
4. Meta jiġi adottat standard armonizzat minn organizzazzjoni Ewropea tal-istandardizzazzjoni u dan jiġi propost lill-Kummissjoni għall-pubblikazzjoni tar-referenza tiegħu f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, il-Kummissjoni għandha tivvaluta l-istandard armonizzat f’konformità mar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012. Meta r-referenza għal standard armonizzat tiġi ppubblikata f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea, il-Kummissjoni għandha tħassar l-atti ta’ implimentazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1, jew il-partijiet minnhom li jkopru l-istess rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu jew, kif applikabbli, l-istess obbligi stipulati fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V.
4. Where a harmonised standard is adopted by a European standardisation organisation and proposed to the Commission for the publication of its reference in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Commission shall assess the harmonised standard in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. When reference to a harmonised standard is published in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Commission shall repeal the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1, or parts thereof which cover the same requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter or, as applicable, the same obligations set out in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V.
5. Meta l-fornituri ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli jew ta’ mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ma jikkonformawx mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmijin fil-paragrafu 1, huma għandhom jiġġustifikaw kif xieraq li jkunu adottaw soluzzjonijiet tekniċi li jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti msemmija fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu jew, kif applikabbli, li jikkonformaw mal-obbligi stipulati fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V sa livell mill-inqas ekwivalenti għalihom.
5. Where providers of high-risk AI systems or general-purpose AI models do not comply with the common specifications referred to in paragraph 1, they shall duly justify that they have adopted technical solutions that meet the requirements referred to in Section 2 of this Chapter or, as applicable, comply with the obligations set out in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V to a level at least equivalent thereto.
6. Meta Stat Membru jqis li speċifikazzjoni komuni ma tissodisfax għalkollox ir-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 jew, kif applikabbli, li jikkonformaw mal-obbligi stipulati fit-Taqsimiet 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu V, għandu jinforma lill-Kummissjoni dwar dan bi spjegazzjoni dettaljata. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tivvaluta dik l-informazzjoni u, jekk ikun xieraq, temenda l-att ta’ implimentazzjoni li jistabbilixxi l-ispeċifikazzjoni komuni kkonċernata.
6. Where a Member State considers that a common specification does not entirely meet the requirements set out in Section 2 or, as applicable, comply with obligations set out in Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter V, it shall inform the Commission thereof with a detailed explanation. The Commission shall assess that information and, if appropriate, amend the implementing act establishing the common specification concerned.
Artikolu 42
Article 42
Preżunzjoni tal-konformità ma’ ċerti rekwiżiti
Presumption of conformity with certain requirements
1. Sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li jkunu ġew imħarrġa u ttestjati fuq data li tirrifletti l-issettjar ġeografiku, komportamentali, kuntestwali jew funzjonali speċifiku li fih ikunu maħsuba li jintużaw għandhom jiġu preżunti li jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti rilevanti stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 10(4).
1. High-risk AI systems that have been trained and tested on data reflecting the specific geographical, behavioural, contextual or functional setting within which they are intended to be used shall be presumed to comply with the relevant requirements laid down in Article 10(4).
2. Sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li jkunu ġew iċċertifikati jew li għalihom tkun inħarġet dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità bi skema taċ-ċibersigurtà skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/881 u li r-referenzi tagħhom ikunu ġew ippubblikati f’Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea għandhom ikunu preżunti li jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti dwar iċ-ċibersigurtà stipulati fl-Artikolu 15 ta’ dan ir-Regolament sa fejn iċ-ċertifikat taċ-ċibersigurtà jew id-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità jew partijiet minnha jkopru dawk ir-rekwiżiti.
2. High-risk AI systems that have been certified or for which a statement of conformity has been issued under a cybersecurity scheme pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/881 and the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to comply with the cybersecurity requirements set out in Article 15 of this Regulation in so far as the cybersecurity certificate or statement of conformity or parts thereof cover those requirements.
Artikolu 43
Article 43
Valutazzjoni tal-konformità
Conformity assessment
1. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli elenkati fl-Anness III, il-punt 1, jekk meta kien qed juri l-konformità ta’ sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, il-fornitur applika standards armonizzati msemmija fl-Artikolu 40 jew, meta applikabbli, l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fl-Artikolu 41, il-fornitur għandu jagħżel waħda mill-proċeduri ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità li ġejjin abbażi ta’:
1. For high-risk AI systems listed in point 1 of Annex III, where, in demonstrating the compliance of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, the provider has applied harmonised standards referred to in Article 40, or, where applicable, common specifications referred to in Article 41, the provider shall opt for one of the following conformity assessment procedures based on:
(a)
il-kontroll intern imsemmi fl-Anness VI; jew
(a)
the internal control referred to in Annex VI; or
(b)
il-valutazzjoni tas-sistema ta’ ġestjoni tal-kwalità u l-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika, bl-involviment ta’ korp notifikat, imsemmija fl-Anness VII.
(b)
the assessment of the quality management system and the assessment of the technical documentation, with the involvement of a notified body, referred to in Annex VII.
Meta juri l-konformità ta’ sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, il-fornitur għandu jsegwi l-proċedura tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità stipulata fl-Anness VII fejn:
In demonstrating the compliance of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Section 2, the provider shall follow the conformity assessment procedure set out in Annex VII where:
(a)
ma jeżistux standards armonizzati kif imsemmija fl-Artikolu 40 u l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fl-Artikolu 41 ma jkunux disponibbli;
(a)
harmonised standards referred to in Article 40 do not exist, and common specifications referred to in Article 41 are not available;
(b)
il-fornitur ma jkunx applika, jew applika biss parti, mill-istandard armonizzat;
(b)
the provider has not applied, or has applied only part of, the harmonised standard;
(c)
l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fil-punt (a) jkunu jeżistu iżda l-fornitur ma jkunx applikahom;
(c)
the common specifications referred to in point (a) exist, but the provider has not applied them;
(d)
wieħed jew aktar mill-istandards armonizzati msemmija fil-punt (a) ikunu ġew ippubblikati b’restrizzjoni u biss fuq il-parti tal-istandard li kienet ġiet ristretta.
(d)
one or more of the harmonised standards referred to in point (a) has been published with a restriction, and only on the part of the standard that was restricted.
Għall-finijiet tal-proċedura ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità msemmija fl-Anness VII, il-fornitur jista’ jagħżel kwalunkwe wieħed mill-korpi notifikati. Madankollu, meta s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli tkun maħsuba biex titqiegħed fis-servizz minn awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq imsemmija fl-Artikolu 74(8) jew (9), kif applikabbli, għandha taġixxi bħala korp notifikat.
For the purposes of the conformity assessment procedure referred to in Annex VII, the provider may choose any of the notified bodies. However, where the high-risk AI system is intended to be put into service by law enforcement, immigration or asylum authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, the market surveillance authority referred to in Article 74(8) or (9), as applicable, shall act as a notified body.
2. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III, il-punti 2 sa 8, il-fornituri għandhom isegwu l-proċedura tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq il-kontroll intern kif imsemmi fl-Anness VI, li ma tipprevedix l-involviment ta’ korp notifikat.
2. For high-risk AI systems referred to in points 2 to 8 of Annex III, providers shall follow the conformity assessment procedure based on internal control as referred to in Annex VI, which does not provide for the involvement of a notified body.
3. Għal sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli koperti bil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I, it-Taqsima A, il-fornitur għandu jsegwi l-proċedura ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità rilevanti kif meħtieġ skont dawk l-atti legali. Ir-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu għandhom japplikaw għal dawk is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli u għandhom ikunu parti minn dik il-valutazzjoni. Għandhom japplikaw ukoll il-punti 4.3., 4.4., 4.5. u l-ħames paragrafu tal-punt 4.6 tal-Anness VII.
3. For high-risk AI systems covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, the provider shall follow the relevant conformity assessment procedure as required under those legal acts. The requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter shall apply to those high-risk AI systems and shall be part of that assessment. Points 4.3., 4.4., 4.5. and the fifth paragraph of point 4.6 of Annex VII shall also apply.
Għall-finijiet ta’ dik il-valutazzjoni, il-korpi notifikati li jkunu ġew notifikati skont dawk l-atti legali għandhom ikunu intitolati li jikkontrollaw il-konformità tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, dment li l-konformità ta’ dawk il-korpi notifikati mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fl-Artikolu 31(4), (10) u (11) tkun ġiet ivvalutata fil-kuntest tal-proċedura ta’ notifika skont dawk l-atti legali.
For the purposes of that assessment, notified bodies which have been notified under those legal acts shall be entitled to control the conformity of the high-risk AI systems with the requirements set out in Section 2, provided that the compliance of those notified bodies with requirements laid down in Article 31(4), (5), (10) and (11) has been assessed in the context of the notification procedure under those legal acts.
Meta att legali elenkat fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I,, jippermetti li l-manifattur tal-prodott ma jipparteċipax f’valutazzjoni tal-konformità minn parti terza, dment li dak il-manifattur ikun applika l-istandards armonizzati kollha li jkopru r-rekwiżiti rilevanti kollha, dak il-manifattur jista’ juża dik l-opzjoni biss jekk ikun applika wkoll standards armonizzati jew, meta applikabbli, l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fl-Artikolu 41, li jkopru r-rekwiżiti kollha stipulati fit-Taqsima 2 ta’ dan il-Kapitolu.
Where a legal act listed in Section A of Annex I enables the product manufacturer to opt out from a third-party conformity assessment, provided that that manufacturer has applied all harmonised standards covering all the relevant requirements, that manufacturer may use that option only if it has also applied harmonised standards or, where applicable, common specifications referred to in Article 41, covering all requirements set out in Section 2 of this Chapter.
4. Is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li diġà ġew soġġetti għal proċedura tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità għandhom jgħaddu minn proċedura ġdida ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità f’każ li ssir modifika sostanzjali, irrispettivament minn jekk is-sistema modifikata tkunx maħsuba li tkompli titqassam jew tkompli tintuża mill-implimentatur attwali.
4. High-risk AI systems that have already been subject to a conformity assessment procedure shall undergo a new conformity assessment procedure in the event of a substantial modification, regardless of whether the modified system is intended to be further distributed or continues to be used by the current deployer.
Għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li jkomplu jitgħallmu wara li jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew jitqiegħdu fis-servizz, il-bidliet fis-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli u fil-prestazzjoni tagħha li jkunu ġew determinati minn qabel mill-fornitur waqt il-valutazzjoni inizjali tal-konformità u li jkunu parti mill-informazzjoni li tinsab fid-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Anness IV, il-punt 2(f), m’għandhomx jikkostitwixxu modifika sostanzjali.
For high-risk AI systems that continue to learn after being placed on the market or put into service, changes to the high-risk AI system and its performance that have been pre-determined by the provider at the moment of the initial conformity assessment and are part of the information contained in the technical documentation referred to in point 2(f) of Annex IV, shall not constitute a substantial modification.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f’konformità mal-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-Annessi VI u VII billi taġġornahom fid-dawl tal-progress tekniku.
5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annexes VI and VII by updating them in light of technical progress.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f’konformità mal-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-paragrafi 1 u 2 ta’ dan l-Artikolu sabiex is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III, il-punti 2 sa 8, jiġu soġġetti għall-proċedura ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità msemmija fl-Anness VII jew partijiet minnha. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta tali atti delegati filwaqt li tqis l-effettività tal-proċedura ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità abbażi ta’ kontroll intern imsemmi fl-Anness VI fil-prevenzjoni jew fil-minimizzazzjoni tar-riskji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza u fil-ħarsien tad-drittijiet fundamentali ppreżentati minn tali sistemi kif ukoll id-disponibbiltà ta’ kapaċitajiet u riżorsi adegwati fost il-korpi notifikati.
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article in order to subject high-risk AI systems referred to in points 2 to 8 of Annex III to the conformity assessment procedure referred to in Annex VII or parts thereof. The Commission shall adopt such delegated acts taking into account the effectiveness of the conformity assessment procedure based on internal control referred to in Annex VI in preventing or minimising the risks to health and safety and protection of fundamental rights posed by such systems, as well as the availability of adequate capacities and resources among notified bodies.
Artikolu 44
Article 44
Ċertifikati
Certificates
1. Iċ-ċertifikati maħruġa minn korpi notifikati f’konformità mal-Anness VII għandhom jitfasslu b’lingwa li tista’ faċilment tiġi mifhuma mill-awtoritajiet rilevanti fl-Istat Membru li fih ikun stabbilit il-korp notifikat.
1. Certificates issued by notified bodies in accordance with Annex VII shall be drawn-up in a language which can be easily understood by the relevant authorities in the Member State in which the notified body is established.
2. Iċ-ċertifikati għandhom ikunu validi għall-perjodu li jindikaw, li ma għandux jaqbeż il-ħames snin għas-sistemi tal-IA koperti mill-Anness I u erba’ snin għas-sistemi tal-IA koperti mill-Anness III. Fuq talba tal-fornitur, il-validità ta’ ċertifikat tista’ tiġi estiża għal perjodi ulterjuri, li kull wieħed minnhom ma jaqbiżx il-ħames snin għas-sistemi tal-IA koperti mill-Anness I u erba’ snin għal sistemi tal-IA koperti mill-Anness III, abbażi ta’ valutazzjoni mill-ġdid f’konformità mal-proċeduri ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità applikabbli. Kwalunkwe suppliment ma’ ċertifikat għandu jibqa’ validu dment li jkun validu ċ-ċertifikat li jissupplimenta.
2. Certificates shall be valid for the period they indicate, which shall not exceed five years for AI systems covered by Annex I, and four years for AI systems covered by Annex III. At the request of the provider, the validity of a certificate may be extended for further periods, each not exceeding five years for AI systems covered by Annex I, and four years for AI systems covered by Annex III, based on a re-assessment in accordance with the applicable conformity assessment procedures. Any supplement to a certificate shall remain valid, provided that the certificate which it supplements is valid.
3. Meta korp notifikat isib li sistema tal-IA m’għadhiex tissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2, filwaqt li jqis il-prinċipju tal-proporzjonalità għandu jissospendi jew jirtira ċ-ċertifikat maħruġ jew jimponi restrizzjonijiet fuqha, sakemm ma tkunx żgurata l-konformità ma’ dawk ir-rekwiżiti b’azzjoni korrettiva xierqa meħuda mill-fornitur tas-sistema sa data tal-iskadenza xierqa stabbilita mill-korp notifikat. Il-korp notifikat għandu jagħti r-raġunijiet għad-deċiżjoni tiegħu.
3. Where a notified body finds that an AI system no longer meets the requirements set out in Section 2, it shall, taking account of the principle of proportionality, suspend or withdraw the certificate issued or impose restrictions on it, unless compliance with those requirements is ensured by appropriate corrective action taken by the provider of the system within an appropriate deadline set by the notified body. The notified body shall give reasons for its decision.
Għandha tkun disponibbli proċedura ta’ appell kontra d-deċiżjonijiet tal-korpi notifikati, inkluż dwar ċertifikati ta’ konformità maħruġa.
An appeal procedure against decisions of the notified bodies, including on conformity certificates issued, shall be available.
Artikolu 45
Article 45
Obbligi tal-informazzjoni tal-korpi notifikati
Information obligations of notified bodies
1. Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jinformaw lill-awtorità tan-notifika b’li ġej:
1. Notified bodies shall inform the notifying authority of the following:
(a)
kwalunkwe ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni, kwalunkwe suppliment għal dawk iċ-ċertifikati, u kwalunkwe approvazzjoni tas-sistema ta’ ġestjoni tal-kwalità maħruġa f’konformità mar-rekwiżiti tal-Anness VII;
(a)
any Union technical documentation assessment certificates, any supplements to those certificates, and any quality management system approvals issued in accordance with the requirements of Annex VII;
(b)
kwalunkwe rifjut, restrizzjoni, sospensjoni jew irtirar ta’ ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni jew approvazzjoni tas-sistema ta’ ġestjoni tal-kwalità maħruġa f’konformità mar-rekwiżiti tal-Anness VII;
(b)
any refusal, restriction, suspension or withdrawal of a Union technical documentation assessment certificate or a quality management system approval issued in accordance with the requirements of Annex VII;
(c)
kull ċirkostanza li taffettwa l-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni tan-notifika jew l-kundizzjonijiet tagħha;
(c)
any circumstances affecting the scope of or conditions for notification;
(d)
kwalunkwe talba għal informazzjoni li jkunu rċevew mingħand l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rigward attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità;
(d)
any request for information which they have received from market surveillance authorities regarding conformity assessment activities;
(e)
meta mitluba, l-attivitajiet ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità mwettqa fil-ambitu tan-notifika tagħhom u kwalunkwe attività oħra mwettqa, inkluż attivitajiet transfruntieri u sottokuntrattar.
(e)
on request, conformity assessment activities performed within the scope of their notification and any other activity performed, including cross-border activities and subcontracting.
2. Kull korp notifikat għandu jinforma lill-korpi notifikati l-oħra dwar:
2. Each notified body shall inform the other notified bodies of:
(a)
approvazzjonijiet tas-sistema ta’ ġestjoni tal-kwalità li jkun irrifjuta, issospenda jew irtira, u, meta jintalab, dwar l-approvazzjonijiet tas-sistema tal-kwalità li jkun ħareġ;
(a)
quality management system approvals which it has refused, suspended or withdrawn, and, upon request, of quality system approvals which it has issued;
(b)
ċertifikati ta’ valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni jew kwalunkwe suppliment għalihom li jkun irrifjuta, irtira, issospenda jew irrestrinġa b’xi mod ieħor, u, fuq talba, ċertifikati u/jew supplimenti tagħhom li jkun ħareġ.
(b)
Union technical documentation assessment certificates or any supplements thereto which it has refused, withdrawn, suspended or otherwise restricted, and, upon request, of the certificates and/or supplements thereto which it has issued.
3. Kull korp notifikat għandu jipprovdi lill-korpi notifikati l-oħra li jwettqu attivitajiet simili ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità li jkopru l-istess tipi ta’ sistemi tal-IA bl-informazzjoni rilevanti dwar kwistjonijiet relatati ma’ riżultati ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità negattivi u, fuq talba, dawk pożittivi.
3. Each notified body shall provide the other notified bodies carrying out similar conformity assessment activities covering the same types of AI systems with relevant information on issues relating to negative and, on request, positive conformity assessment results.
4. ’Il-korpi notifikati għandhom jissalvagwardaw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni li huma jiksbu, f’konformità mal-Artikolu 78.
4. Notified bodies shall safeguard the confidentiality of the information that they obtain, in accordance with Article 78.
Artikolu 46
Article 46
Deroga mill-proċedura ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità
Derogation from conformity assessment procedure
1. B’deroga mill-Artikolu 43 u fuq talba debitament ġustifikata, kwalunkwe awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tista’ tawtorizza l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli speċifiċi fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru kkonċernat, għal raġunijiet eċċezzjonali ta’ sigurtà pubblika jew il-protezzjoni tal-ħajja u tas-saħħa tal-persuni, għall-ħarsien tal-ambjent jew għall-protezzjoni ta’ assi industrijali u infrastrutturali ewlenin. Dik l-awtorizzazzjoni għandha tkun għal perjodu limitat waqt li jkunu qed isiru l-proċeduri ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità meħtieġa, filwaqt li jitqiesu r-raġunijiet eċċezzjonali li jiġġustifikaw id-deroga. It-tlestija ta’ dawk il-proċeduri għandha ssir mingħajr dewmien żejjed.
1. By way of derogation from Article 43 and upon a duly justified request, any market surveillance authority may authorise the placing on the market or the putting into service of specific high-risk AI systems within the territory of the Member State concerned, for exceptional reasons of public security or the protection of life and health of persons, environmental protection or the protection of key industrial and infrastructural assets. That authorisation shall be for a limited period while the necessary conformity assessment procedures are being carried out, taking into account the exceptional reasons justifying the derogation. The completion of those procedures shall be undertaken without undue delay.
2. F’sitwazzjoni ta’ urġenza debitament ġustifikata għal raġunijiet eċċezzjonali ta’ sigurtà pubblika jew fil-każ ta’ theddida speċifika, sostanzjali u imminenti għall-ħajja jew għas-sikurezza fiżika ta’ persuni fiżiċi, l-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew l-awtoritajiet tal-protezzjoni ċivili jistgħu jqiegħdu fis-servizz sistema speċifika tal-IA b’riskju għoli mingħajr l-awtorizzazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 dment li tali awtorizzazzjoni tintalab matul jew wara l-użu mingħajr dewmien żejjed. Jekk l-awtorizzazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 tiġi rrifjutata, l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli għandu jitwaqqaf b’effett immedjat u r-riżultati u l-outputs kollha ta’ dan l-użu għandhom jiġu skartati minnufih.
2. In a duly justified situation of urgency for exceptional reasons of public security or in the case of specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons, law-enforcement authorities or civil protection authorities may put a specific high-risk AI system into service without the authorisation referred to in paragraph 1, provided that such authorisation is requested during or after the use without undue delay. If the authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 is refused, the use of the high-risk AI system shall be stopped with immediate effect and all the results and outputs of such use shall be immediately discarded.
3. L-awtorizzazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tinħareġ biss jekk l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tikkonkludi li s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli tikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti tat-Taqsima 2. L-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha tinforma lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra dwar kwalunkwe awtorizzazzjoni maħruġa skont il-paragrafi 1 u 2. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux ikopri data operazzjonali sensittiva marbuta mal-attivitajiet tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
3. The authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be issued only if the market surveillance authority concludes that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements of Section 2. The market surveillance authority shall inform the Commission and the other Member States of any authorisation issued pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2. This obligation shall not cover sensitive operational data in relation to the activities of law-enforcement authorities.
4. Jekk, fi żmien 15-il jum tal-kalendarju minn meta tasal l-informazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 3, ma tkun saret l-ebda oġġezzjoni minn xi Stat Membru jew mill-Kummissjoni rigward awtorizzazzjoni maħruġa minn awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru f’konformità mal-paragrafu 1, dik l-awtorizzazzjoni għandha titqies iġġustifikata.
4. Where, within 15 calendar days of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 3, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of an authorisation issued by a market surveillance authority of a Member State in accordance with paragraph 1, that authorisation shall be deemed justified.
5. Meta, fi żmien 15-il jum kalendarju minn meta tasal in-notifika msemmija fil-paragrafu 3, jitqajmu oġġezzjonijiet minn Stat Membru kontra awtorizzazzjoni maħruġa minn awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru ieħor, jew meta l-Kummissjoni tqis li l-awtorizzazzjoni tmur kontra d-dritt tal-Unjoni jew il-konklużjoni tal-Istati Membri fir-rigward tal-konformità tas-sistema kif imsemmija fil-paragrafu 3 tkun bla bażi valida, il-Kummissjoni għandha, mingħajr dewmien, tidħol f’konsultazzjonijiet mal-Istat Membru rilevanti. L-operaturi kkonċernati għandhom jiġu kkonsultati u jkollhom il-possibbiltà li jippreżentaw il-fehmiet tagħhom. B’kunsiderazzjoni ta’ dan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tiddeċiedi jekk l-awtorizzazzjoni hix iġġustifikata jew le. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tindirizza d-deċiżjoni tagħha lill-Istat Membru kkonċernat u lill-operaturi rilevanti.
5. Where, within 15 calendar days of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 3, objections are raised by a Member State against an authorisation issued by a market surveillance authority of another Member State, or where the Commission considers the authorisation to be contrary to Union law, or the conclusion of the Member States regarding the compliance of the system as referred to in paragraph 3 to be unfounded, the Commission shall, without delay, enter into consultations with the relevant Member State. The operators concerned shall be consulted and have the possibility to present their views. Having regard thereto, the Commission shall decide whether the authorisation is justified. The Commission shall address its decision to the Member State concerned and to the relevant operators.
6. Meta l-Kummissjoni tqis li l-awtorizzazzjoni mhix iġġustifikata, din għandha tiġi rtirata mill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru kkonċernat.
6. Where the Commission considers the authorisation unjustified, it shall be withdrawn by the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned.
7. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli relatati ma’ prodotti koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I, it-Taqsima A, għandhom japplikaw biss id-derogi mill-valutazzjoni tal-konformità stabbiliti f’dik il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni.
7. For high-risk AI systems related to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, only the derogations from the conformity assessment established in that Union harmonisation legislation shall apply.
Artikolu 47
Article 47
Dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE
EU declaration of conformity
1. Il-fornitur għandu jfassal dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE bil-miktub li tinqara mill-magni, ffirmata b’mod fiżiku jew elettroniku, għal kull sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli u jżommha għad-dispożizzjoni tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għal 10 snin wara li s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli tkun ġiet introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz. Id-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE għandha tidentifika s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli li għaliha tkun tfasslet. Fuq talba, għandha tiġi ppreżentata kopja tad-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti rilevanti.
1. The provider shall draw up a written machine readable, physical or electronically signed EU declaration of conformity for each high-risk AI system, and keep it at the disposal of the national competent authorities for 10 years after the high-risk AI system has been placed on the market or put into service. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the high-risk AI system for which it has been drawn up. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity shall be submitted to the relevant national competent authorities upon request.
2. Id-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE għandha tgħid li s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli ikkonċernata tissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2. Id-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE għandu jkun fiha l-informazzjoni stipulata fl-Anness V u għandha tiġi tradotta b’lingwa li tista’ tinftiehem faċilment mill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti tal-Istati Membri li fihom tiġi introdotta jew imqiegħda fis-suq is-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli.
2. The EU declaration of conformity shall state that the high-risk AI system concerned meets the requirements set out in Section 2. The EU declaration of conformity shall contain the information set out in Annex V, and shall be translated into a language that can be easily understood by the national competent authorities of the Member States in which the high-risk AI system is placed on the market or made available.
3. Meta s-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli jkunu soġġetti għal leġiżlazzjoni oħra tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni li ukoll tkun tirrikjedi dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE, għandha titfassal dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità unika tal-UE fir-rigward tal-liġijiet kollha tal-Unjoni applikabbli għas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli. Id-dikjarazzjoni għandu jkun fiha l-informazzjoni kollha meħtieġa biex tiġi identifikata l-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni li magħha tkun marbuta d-dikjarazzjoni.
3. Where high-risk AI systems are subject to other Union harmonisation legislation which also requires an EU declaration of conformity, a single EU declaration of conformity shall be drawn up in respect of all Union law applicable to the high-risk AI system. The declaration shall contain all the information required to identify the Union harmonisation legislation to which the declaration relates.
4. Billi jfassal id-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE, il-fornitur għandu jassumi r-responsabbiltà għall-konformità mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fit-Taqsima 2. Il-fornitur għandu jżomm id-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE aġġornata kif xieraq.
4. By drawing up the EU declaration of conformity, the provider shall assume responsibility for compliance with the requirements set out in Section 2. The provider shall keep the EU declaration of conformity up-to-date as appropriate.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f’konformità mal-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-Anness V billi taġġorna l-kontenut tad-dikjarazzjoni ta’ konformità tal-UE stipulata f’dak l-Anness biex tintroduċi elementi li jsiru meħtieġa fid-dawl tal-progress tekniku.
5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annex V by updating the content of the EU declaration of conformity set out in that Annex, in order to introduce elements that become necessary in light of technical progress.
Artikolu 48
Article 48
Markatura CE
CE marking
1. Il-markatura CE għandha tkun soġġetta għall-prinċipji ġenerali stipulati fl-Artikolu 30 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 765/2008.
1. The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
2. Għal sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli li jiġu fornuti b’mod diġitali, għandha tintuża markatura CE diġitali biss jekk jista’ jkun hemm aċċess għaliha faċilment permezz tal-interfaċċa li minnha jinkiseb aċċess għal dik is-sistema jew permezz ta’ kodiċi aċċessibbli faċilment li jinqara mill-magni jew permezz ta’ mezzi elettroniċi oħra.
2. For high-risk AI systems provided digitally, a digital CE marking shall be used, only if it can easily be accessed via the interface from which that system is accessed or via an easily accessible machine-readable code or other electronic means.
3. Il-markatura CE għandha titwaħħal b’mod viżibbli, leġġibbli u li ma jitħassarx għal sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli. Meta dan ma jkunx possibbli jew ma jkunx jaqbel li jsir minħabba n-natura tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli, din għandha titwaħħal mal-imballaġġ u mad-dokumentazzjoni li takkumpanjaha, skont kif ikun xieraq.
3. The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly for high-risk AI systems. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the high-risk AI system, it shall be affixed to the packaging or to the accompanying documentation, as appropriate.
4. Meta applikabbli, il-markatura CE għandha tiġi segwita bin-numru tal-identifikazzjoni tal-korp notifikat responsabbli għall-proċeduri ta’ valutazzjoni tal-konformità stipulat fl-Artikolu 43. In-numru ta’ identifikazzjoni tal-korp notifikat għandu jitwaħħal mill-korp innifsu jew, fuq istruzzjonijiet tiegħu, mill-fornitur jew mir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu. In-numru tal-identifikazzjoni għandu jkun indikat ukoll f’kull materjal promozzjonali li jsemmi li s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli tissodisfa r-rekwiżiti għall-markatura CE.
4. Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 43. The identification number of the notified body shall be affixed by the body itself or, under its instructions, by the provider or by the provider’s authorised representative. The identification number shall also be indicated in any promotional material which mentions that the high-risk AI system fulfils the requirements for CE marking.
5. Meta s-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli jkunu soġġetti għal liġi oħra tal-Unjoni li tipprevedi wkoll it-twaħħil tal-markatura CE, il-markatura CE għandha tindika li s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli tissodisfa wkoll ir-rekwiżiti ta’ dik il-liġi l-oħra.
5. Where high-risk AI systems are subject to other Union law which also provides for the affixing of the CE marking, the CE marking shall indicate that the high-risk AI system also fulfil the requirements of that other law.
Artikolu 49
Article 49
Reġistrazzjoni
Registration
1. Qabel l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz ta’ sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli elenkata fl-Anness III, bl-eċċezzjoni ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 2 l-Anness III, il-fornitur jew, meta applikabbli, ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu jirreġistra lili nnifsu u s-sistema tiegħu fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71.
1. Before placing on the market or putting into service a high-risk AI system listed in Annex III, with the exception of high-risk AI systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III, the provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative shall register themselves and their system in the EU database referred to in Article 71.
2. Qabel l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz ta’ sistema tal-IA li għaliha l-fornitur ikun ikkonkluda li mhix ta’ riskju għoli skont l-Artikolu 6(3), dak il-fornitur jew, meta applikabbli, ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu jirreġistra lilu nnifsu u dik is-sistema fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71.
2. Before placing on the market or putting into service an AI system for which the provider has concluded that it is not high-risk according to Article 6(3), that provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative shall register themselves and that system in the EU database referred to in Article 71.
3. Qabel ma jqiegħdu fis-servizz jew jużaw sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli elenkata fl-Anness III, bl-eċċezzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli elenkati fil-punt 2 tal-Anness III, l-implimentaturi li huma awtoritajiet pubbliċi, istituzzjonijiet tal-Unjoni, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji jew persuni li jaġixxu f’isimhom għandhom jirreġistraw lilhom infushom, jagħżlu s-sistema u jirreġistraw l-użu tagħha fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71.
3. Before putting into service or using a high-risk AI system listed in Annex III, with the exception of high-risk AI systems listed in point 2 of Annex III, deployers that are public authorities, Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies or persons acting on their behalf shall register themselves, select the system and register its use in the EU database referred to in Article 71.
4. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fil-punti 1, 6 u 7 tal-Anness III, fl-oqsma tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-migrazzjoni, tal-ażil u tal-ġestjoni tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, ir-reġistrazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafi 1, 2 u 3 ta’ dan l-Artikolu għandha tkun f’taqsima sigura mhux pubblika tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71 u għandha tinkludi biss l-informazzjoni li ġejja, kif applikabbli, msemmija hawnhekk:
4. For high-risk AI systems referred to in points 1, 6 and 7 of Annex III, in the areas of law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control management, the registration referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall be in a secure non-public section of the EU database referred to in Article 71 and shall include only the following information, as applicable, referred to in:
(a)
it-taqsima A, il-punti 1 sa 10 tal-Anness VIII,, bl-eċċezzjoni tal-punti 6, 8 u 9;
(a)
Section A, points 1 to 10, of Annex VIII, with the exception of points 6, 8 and 9;
(b)
it-Taqsima C, il-punti 1 sa 5, u l-punti 8 u 9 tal-Anness VIII;
(b)
Section B, points 1 to 5, and points 8 and 9 of Annex VIII;
(c)
it-Taqsima C, il-punti 1 sa 3, tal-Anness VIII;
(c)
Section C, points 1 to 3, of Annex VIII;
(d)
il-punti 1, 2, 3 u 5, tal-Anness IX.
(d)
points 1, 2, 3 and 5, of Annex IX.
Il-Kummissjoni u l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali msemmija fl-Artikolu 74(8) biss għandu jkollhom aċċess għat-taqsimiet ristretti rispettivi tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE elenkati fl-ewwel subparagrafu ta’ dan il-paragrafu.
Only the Commission and national authorities referred to in Article 74(8) shall have access to the respective restricted sections of the EU database listed in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.
5. Is-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 2 tal-Anness III, għandhom jiġu rreġistrati fil-livell nazzjonali.
5. High-risk AI systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III shall be registered at national level.
KAPITOLU IV
CHAPTER IV
OBBLIGI TA’ TRASPARENZA GĦALL-FORNITURI U GĦALL-IMPLIMENTATURI TA’ ĊERTI SISTEMI TAL-IA
TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMS
Artikolu 50
Article 50
Obbligi ta’ trasparenza għall-fornituri u għall-implimentaturi ta’ ċerti sistemi tal-IA
Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems
1. Il-fornituri għandhom jiżguraw li s-sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jinteraġixxu direttament ma’ persuni fiżiċi jiġu ddisinjati u żviluppati b’tali mod li l-persuni fiżiċi kkonċernati jiġu informati li qed jinteraġixxu ma’ sistema tal-IA, sakemm dan ma jkunx ovvju mill-perspettiva ta’ persuna fiżika li tkun raġonevolment infurmata tajjeb, osservanti u prudenti, b’kont meħud taċ-ċirkostanzi u l-kuntest tal-użu. Dan l-obbligu m’għandux japplika għas-sistemi tal-IA awtorizzati bil-liġi li jikxfu, jipprevjenu, jinvestigaw jew jipprosegwixxu reati kriminali, soġġett għal salvagwardji xierqa għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet ta’ partijiet terzi, dment li dawk is-sistemi ma jkunux disponibbli għall-pubbliku biex jiġi rrappurtat reat kriminali.
1. Providers shall ensure that AI systems intended to interact directly with natural persons are designed and developed in such a way that the natural persons concerned are informed that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the point of view of a natural person who is reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect, taking into account the circumstances and the context of use. This obligation shall not apply to AI systems authorised by law to detect, prevent, investigate or prosecute criminal offences, subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of third parties, unless those systems are available for the public to report a criminal offence.
2. Il-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA, inkluż is-sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, li jiġġeneraw kontenut ta’ awdjo, immaġni, vidjo jew test sintetiku, għandhom jiżguraw li l-outputs tas-sistema tal-IA jiġu mmarkati f’format li jinqara mill-magni u jiġu identifikati bħala ġġenerati jew manipulati b’mod artifiċjali. Il-fornituri għandhom jiżguraw li s-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi tagħhom ikunu effettivi, interoperabbli, robusti u affidabbli sa fejn dan ikun teknikament fattibbli, filwaqt li jqisu l-ispeċifiċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet ta’ tipi diversi ta’ kontenut, il-kostijiet tal-implimentazzjoni u l-ogħla livell ta’ żvilupp tekniku rikonoxxut b’mod ġenerali, kif jista’ jkun rifless fl-istandards tekniċi rilevanti. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux japplika sakemm is-sistemi tal-IA jwettqu funzjoni ta’ assistenza għall-editjar tal-istandards jew ma jbiddlux b’mod sostanzjali d-data tal-input ipprovduta mill-implimentatur jew is-semantika tagħha, jew meta awtorizzati bil-liġi biex iwettqu l-kxif, il-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta’ reati kriminali.
2. Providers of AI systems, including general-purpose AI systems, generating synthetic audio, image, video or text content, shall ensure that the outputs of the AI system are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated. Providers shall ensure their technical solutions are effective, interoperable, robust and reliable as far as this is technically feasible, taking into account the specificities and limitations of various types of content, the costs of implementation and the generally acknowledged state of the art, as may be reflected in relevant technical standards. This obligation shall not apply to the extent the AI systems perform an assistive function for standard editing or do not substantially alter the input data provided by the deployer or the semantics thereof, or where authorised by law to detect, prevent, investigate or prosecute criminal offences.
3. L-implimentaturi ta’ sistema ta’ rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet jew ta’ sistema ta’ kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika għandhom jinfurmaw lill-persuni fiżiċi esposti għaliha dwar it-tħaddim tas-sistema u għandhom jipproċessaw id-data personali f’konformità mar-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 u (UE) 2018/1725 u d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, kif applikabbli. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux japplika għas-sistemi tal-IA użati għall-kategorizzazzjoni tal-bijometrika u r-rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet li għandhom il-permess bil-liġi li jikxfu, jipprevjenu jew jinvestigaw reati kriminali, soġġett għal salvagwardji xierqa għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet ta’ partijiet terzi, u f’konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni.
3. Deployers of an emotion recognition system or a biometric categorisation system shall inform the natural persons exposed thereto of the operation of the system, and shall process the personal data in accordance with Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, as applicable. This obligation shall not apply to AI systems used for biometric categorisation and emotion recognition, which are permitted by law to detect, prevent or investigate criminal offences, subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of third parties, and in accordance with Union law.
4. L-implimentaturi ta’ sistema tal-IA li tiġġenera jew timmanipula kontenut ta’ immaġni, awdjo jew vidjo li jikkostitwixxi deepfake, għandhom jiddivulgaw li l-kontenut ġie ġġenerat jew immanipulat b’mod artifiċjali. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux japplika meta l-użu jkun awtorizzat bil-liġi għall-kxif, il-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta’ reati kriminali. Meta l-kontenut jifforma parti minn ħidma jew programm evidentement artistiku, kreattiv, satiriku, fittizju jew analogu, l-obbligi ta’ trasparenza stipulati f’dan il-paragrafu huma limitati għad-divulgazzjoni tal-eżistenza ta’ tali kontenut iġġenerat jew manipulat b’mod xieraq li ma jfixkilx il-wiri jew it-tgawdija tax-xogħol.
4. Deployers of an AI system that generates or manipulates image, audio or video content constituting a deep fake, shall disclose that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated. This obligation shall not apply where the use is authorised by law to detect, prevent, investigate or prosecute criminal offence. Where the content forms part of an evidently artistic, creative, satirical, fictional or analogous work or programme, the transparency obligations set out in this paragraph are limited to disclosure of the existence of such generated or manipulated content in an appropriate manner that does not hamper the display or enjoyment of the work.
L-implimentaturi ta’ sistema tal-IA li tiġġenera jew timmanipula test li jiġi ppubblikat bl-għan li l-pubbliku jiġi infurmat dwar kwistjonijiet ta’ interess pubbliku għandhom jiddivulgaw li t-test ġie ġġenerat jew immanipulat b’mod artifiċjali. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux japplika meta l-użu jkun awtorizzat bil-liġi għall-kxif, il-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta’ reati kriminali jew meta l-kontenut iġġenerat mill-IA jkun għadda minn proċess ta’ rieżami mill-bniedem jew kontroll editorjali u fejn persuna fiżika jew ġuridika jkollha r-responsabbiltà editorjali għall-pubblikazzjoni tal-kontenut.
Deployers of an AI system that generates or manipulates text which is published with the purpose of informing the public on matters of public interest shall disclose that the text has been artificially generated or manipulated. This obligation shall not apply where the use is authorised by law to detect, prevent, investigate or prosecute criminal offences or where the AI-generated content has undergone a process of human review or editorial control and where a natural or legal person holds editorial responsibility for the publication of the content.
5. L-informazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafi 1 sa 4 għandha tiġi pprovduta lill-persuni fiżiċi kkonċernati b’mod ċar u li jingħaraf mhux aktar tard mill-mument tal-ewwel interazzjoni jew esponiment. L-informazzjoni għandha tkun konformi mar-rekwiżiti ta’ aċċessibbiltà applikabbli.
5. The information referred to in paragraphs 1 to 4 shall be provided to the natural persons concerned in a clear and distinguishable manner at the latest at the time of the first interaction or exposure. The information shall conform to the applicable accessibility requirements.
6. Il-paragrafi 1 sa 4 ma għandhomx jaffettwaw ir-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, u għandhom ikunu mingħajr preġudizzju għal obbligi oħra ta’ trasparenza stabbiliti fil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali għall-implimentaturi tas-sistemi tal-IA.
6. Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not affect the requirements and obligations set out in Chapter III, and shall be without prejudice to other transparency obligations laid down in Union or national law for deployers of AI systems.
7. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jħeġġeġ u jiffaċilita t-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet ta' prattika fil-livell tal-Unjoni biex jiffaċilita l-implimentazzjoni effettiva tal-obbligi rigward il-kxif u t-tikkettar ta' kontenut iġġenerat jew manipulat b'mod artifiċjali. Il-Kummissjoni tista’ tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni biex tapprova dawk il-kodiċijiet ta' prattika f'konformità mal-proċedura stabbilita fl-Artikolu 56(6). Jekk tqis li l-kodiċi ma jkunx adegwat, il-Kummissjoni tista’ tadotta att ta' implimentazzjoni li jispeċifika regoli komuni għall-implimentazzjoni ta' dawk l-obbligi f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami stipulata fl-Artikolu 98(2).
7. The AI Office shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of practice at Union level to facilitate the effective implementation of the obligations regarding the detection and labelling of artificially generated or manipulated content. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to approve those codes of practice in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 56 (6). If it deems the code is not adequate, the Commission may adopt an implementing act specifying common rules for the implementation of those obligations in accordance with the examination procedure laid down in Article 98(2).
KAPITOLU V
CHAPTER V
MUDELLI TAL-IA BI SKOP ĠENERALI
GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
TAQSIMA 1
SECTION 1
Regoli ta' klassifikazzjoni
Classification rules
Artikolu 51
Article 51
Klassifikazzjoni tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali bħala mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku
Classification of general-purpose AI models as general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
1. Mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għandu jiġi kklassifikat bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku jekk jissodisfa xi wieħed mill-kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin:
1. A general-purpose AI model shall be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk if it meets any of the following conditions:
(a)
ikollu kapaċitajiet b'impatt kbir evalwati abbażi ta' għodod u metodoloġiji tekniċi xierqa, inkluż indikaturi u parametri referenzjarji;
(a)
it has high impact capabilities evaluated on the basis of appropriate technical tools and methodologies, including indicators and benchmarks;
(b)
abbażi ta' deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni, ex officio jew wara allert kwalifikat mill-bord, ikollu kapaċitajiet jew impatt ekwivalenti għal dawk stipulati fil-punt (a) b'kont meħud tal-kriterji stipulati fl-Anness XIII.
(b)
based on a decision of the Commission, ex officio or following a qualified alert from the scientific panel, it has capabilities or an impact equivalent to those set out in point (a) having regard to the criteria set out in Annex XIII.
2. Mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għandu jiġi preżunt li għandu kapaċitajiet b'impatt kbir skont il-paragrafu 1, il-punt (a) meta l-ammont kumulattiv ta' komputazzjoni użat għat-taħriġ tiegħu mkejjel f’operazzjonijiet b'punt varjabbli jkun akbar minn 1025.
2. A general-purpose AI model shall be presumed to have high impact capabilities pursuant to paragraph 1, point (a), when the cumulative amount of computation used for its training measured in floating point operations is greater than 1025.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 biex temenda l-limiti elenkati fil-paragrafi 1 u 2 ta' dan l-Artikolu, kif ukoll biex tissupplimenta l-parametri referenzjarji u l-indikaturi fid-dawl tal-iżviluppi teknoloġiċi li qed jevolvu, bħal titjib algoritmiku jew effiċjenza akbar tal-hardware, meta jkun meħtieġ, biex dawn il-limiti jirriflettu l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku.
3. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to amend the thresholds listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, as well as to supplement benchmarks and indicators in light of evolving technological developments, such as algorithmic improvements or increased hardware efficiency, when necessary, for these thresholds to reflect the state of the art.
Artikolu 52
Article 52
Proċedura
Procedure
1. Meta mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jissodisfa l-kundizzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 51(1), il-punt (a), il-fornitur rilevanti għandu jinnotifika lill-Kummissjoni mingħajr dewmien u fi kwalunkwe każ fi żmien ġimagħtejn wara li jiġi ssodisfat dak ir-rekwiżit jew isir magħruf li ser jiġi ssodisfat. Dik in-notifika għandha tinkludi l-informazzjoni meħtieġa biex jintwera li r-rekwiżit rilevanti ġie ssodisfat. Jekk il-Kummissjoni ssir taf b'mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jippreżenta riskji sistemiċi li ma tkunx ġiet innotifikata bihom, tista' tiddeċiedi li tiddeżinjah bħala mudell b'riskju sistemiku.
1. Where a general-purpose AI model meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), the relevant provider shall notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes known that it will be met. That notification shall include the information necessary to demonstrate that the relevant requirement has been met. If the Commission becomes aware of a general-purpose AI model presenting systemic risks of which it has not been notified, it may decide to designate it as a model with systemic risk.
2. Il-fornitur ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jissodisfa l-kondizzjonijiet msemmija fl-Artikolu 51(1), il-punt (a), jista' jippreżenta, flimkien man-notifika tiegħu, argumenti sostanzjati biżżejjed biex juri li, b'mod eċċezzjonali, għalkemm jissodisfa dak ir-rekwiżit, il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ma jippreżentax, minħabba l-karatteristiċi speċifiċi tiegħu, riskji sistemiċi u għalhekk jenħtieġ li ma jiġix ikklassifikat bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku.
2. The provider of a general-purpose AI model that meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), may present, with its notification, sufficiently substantiated arguments to demonstrate that, exceptionally, although it meets that requirement, the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks and therefore should not be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
3. Meta l-Kummissjoni tikkonkludi li l-argumenti ppreżentati skont il-paragrafu 2 ma jkunux sostanzjati biżżejjed u l-fornitur rilevanti ma kienx kapaċi juri li l-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ma jippreżentax, minħabba l-karatteristiċi speċifiċi tiegħu, riskji sistemiċi, hija għandha tirrifjuta dawk l-argumenti u l-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għandu jitqies li hu mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku.
3. Where the Commission concludes that the arguments submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 are not sufficiently substantiated and the relevant provider was not able to demonstrate that the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks, it shall reject those arguments, and the general-purpose AI model shall be considered to be a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
4. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tiddeżinja mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali bħala li jippreżenta riskji sistemiċi, ex officio jew wara allert kwalifikat mill-bord skont l-Artikolu 90(1), il-punt (a), abbażi tal-kriterji stipulati fl-Anness XIII.
4. The Commission may designate a general-purpose AI model as presenting systemic risks, ex officio or following a qualified alert from the scientific panel pursuant to Article 90(1), point (a), on the basis of criteria set out in Annex XIII.
Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati skont l-Artikolu 97 sabiex temenda l-Anness XIII billi tispeċifika u taġġorna l-kriterji stipulati f’dak l-Anness.
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annex XIII by specifying and updating the criteria set out in that Annex.
5. Fuq talba motivata ta' fornitur li l-mudell tiegħu jkun ġie ddeżinjat bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku skont il-paragrafu 4, il-Kummissjoni għandha tqis it-talba u tista' tiddeċiedi li tivvaluta mill-ġdid jekk il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għadux jista' jitqies li jippreżenta riskji sistemiċi abbażi tal-kriterji stipulati fl-Anness XIII. Tali talba għandu jkun fiha raġunijiet oġġettivi, dettaljati u ġodda li jkunu ħargu minn wara dakinhar li saret id-deċiżjoni tad-deżinjazzjoni. Il-fornituri jistgħu jitolbu rivalutazzjoni mhux qabel sitt xhur wara d-deċiżjoni tad-deżinjazzjoni. Meta l-Kummissjoni, wara r-rivalutazzjoni tagħha, tiddeċiedi li żżomm id-deżinjazzjoni bħala mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, il-fornituri jistgħu jitolbu rivalutazzjoni mhux qabel sitt xhur wara dik id-deċiżjoni.
5. Upon a reasoned request of a provider whose model has been designated as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk pursuant to paragraph 4, the Commission shall take the request into account and may decide to reassess whether the general-purpose AI model can still be considered to present systemic risks on the basis of the criteria set out in Annex XIII. Such a request shall contain objective, detailed and new reasons that have arisen since the designation decision. Providers may request reassessment at the earliest six months after the designation decision. Where the Commission, following its reassessment, decides to maintain the designation as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk, providers may request reassessment at the earliest six months after that decision.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżgura li tiġi ppubblikata lista ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku u għandha żżomm dik il-lista aġġornata, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-ħtieġa li jiġu rrispettati u protetti d-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali u l-informazzjoni kummerċjali riżervata jew is-sigrieti kummerċjali f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni u dak nazzjonali.
6. The Commission shall ensure that a list of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk is published and shall keep that list up to date, without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law.
TAQSIMA 2
SECTION 2
Obbligi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models
Artikolu 53
Article 53
Obbligi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models
1. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għandhom:
1. Providers of general-purpose AI models shall:
(a)
ifasslu u jżommu aġġornata d-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-mudell, inkluż il-proċess ta' taħriġ u ttestjar tiegħu u r-riżultati tal-evalwazzjoni tiegħu, li għandu jkun fiha, bħala minimu, l-informazzjoni stipulati fl-Anness XI għall-fini li tintbagħat, fuq talba, lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA u lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti;
(a)
draw up and keep up-to-date the technical documentation of the model, including its training and testing process and the results of its evaluation, which shall contain, at a minimum, the information set out in Annex XI for the purpose of providing it, upon request, to the AI Office and the national competent authorities;
(b)
ifasslu, iżommu aġġornati u jagħmlu disponibbli informazzjoni u dokumentazzjoni lill-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA li beħsiebhom jintegraw il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali fis-sistemi tal-IA tagħhom. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-ħtieġa li jiġu osservati u protetti d-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali u l-informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali jew is-sigrieti kummerċjali f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni u l-liġi nazzjonali, l-informazzjoni u d-dokumentazzjoni:
(b)
draw up, keep up-to-date and make available information and documentation to providers of AI systems who intend to integrate the general-purpose AI model into their AI systems. Without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law, the information and documentation shall:
(i)
għandhom jippermettu lill-fornituri tas-sistemi tal-IA jkollhom fehim tajjeb tal-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u jikkonformaw mal-obbligi tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament; u
(i)
enable providers of AI systems to have a good understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the general-purpose AI model and to comply with their obligations pursuant to this Regulation; and
(ii)
għandu jkun fihom, bħala minimu, l-elementi stipulati fl-Anness XII;
(ii)
contain, at a minimum, the elements set out in Annex XII;
(c)
idaħħlu fis-seħħ politika biex jikkonformaw mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur u drittijiet relatati, u b'mod partikolari biex jidentifikaw u jikkonformaw ma', inkluż permezz ta' teknoloġiji tal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku, riżerva tad-drittijiet espressa skont l-Artikolu 4(3) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2019/790;
(c)
put in place a policy to comply with Union law on copyright and related rights, and in particular to identify and comply with, including through state-of-the-art technologies, a reservation of rights expressed pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/790;
(d)
ifasslu u jagħmlu disponibbli għall-pubbliku sommarju dettaljat b'mod adegwat dwar il-kontenut użat għat-taħriġ tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, skont mudell ipprovdut mill-Uffiċċju għall-IA.
(d)
draw up and make publicly available a sufficiently detailed summary about the content used for training of the general-purpose AI model, according to a template provided by the AI Office.
2. L-obbligi stipulati fil-paragrafu 1, il-punti (a) u (b), ma għandhomx japplikaw għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA li jiġu rilaxxati b'liċenzja libera u b’sors miftuħ li tippermetti l-aċċess, l-użu, il-modifika u d-distribuzzjoni tal-mudell, u li l-parametri tagħhom, inkluż il-piżijiet, l-informazzjoni dwar l-arkitettura tal-mudell, u l-informazzjoni dwar l-użu tal-mudell, ikunu disponibbli għall-pubbliku. Din l-eċċezzjoni ma għandhiex tapplika għal mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi.
2. The obligations set out in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), shall not apply to providers of AI models that are released under a free and open-source licence that allows for the access, usage, modification, and distribution of the model, and whose parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage, are made publicly available. This exception shall not apply to general-purpose AI models with systemic risks.
3. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali għandhom jikkooperaw kif meħtieġ mal-Kummissjoni u mal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti fl-eżerċizzju tal-kompetenzi u s-setgħat tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament.
3. Providers of general-purpose AI models shall cooperate as necessary with the Commission and the national competent authorities in the exercise of their competences and powers pursuant to this Regulation.
4. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu jiddependu fuq kodiċijiet ta' prattika skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 56 biex juru konformità mal-obbligi stipulati fil-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu, sakemm jiġi ppubblikat standard armonizzat. Il-konformità mal-istandards armonizzati Ewropej tagħti lill-fornituri l-preżunzjoni ta’ konformità sal-punt li dawk l-istandards ikopru dawk l-obbligi. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li ma jaderixxux ma' kodiċi ta' prattika approvat jew li ma jikkonformawx ma’ standard armonizzat Ewropew għandhom juru mezzi adegwati alternattivi ta' konformità għall-evalwazzjoni mill-Kummissjoni.
4. Providers of general-purpose AI models may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to the extent that those standards cover those obligations. Providers of general-purpose AI models who do not adhere to an approved code of practice or do not comply with a European harmonised standard shall demonstrate alternative adequate means of compliance for assessment by the Commission.
5. Għall-fini tal-iffaċilitar tal-konformità mal-Anness XI, b'mod partikolari l-punti 2 (d) u (e) tiegħu, il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97 biex tagħti dettalji dwar metodoloġiji ta' kejl u kalkolu bl-għan li tippermetti dokumentazzjoni komparabbli u verifikabbli.
5. For the purpose of facilitating compliance with Annex XI, in particular points 2 (d) and (e) thereof, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to detail measurement and calculation methodologies with a view to allowing for comparable and verifiable documentation.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 97(2) biex temenda l-Annessi XI u XII fid-dawl ta' żviluppi tekniċi li qed jevolvu.
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97(2) to amend Annexes XI and XII in light of evolving technological developments.
7. Kwalunkwe informazzjoni jew dokumentazzjoni miksuba skont dan l-Artikolu, inkluż sigrieti kummerċjali, għandhom jiġu ttrattati f'konformità mal-obbligi ta' kunfidenzjalità stipulati fl-Artikolu 78.
7. Any information or documentation obtained pursuant to this Article, including trade secrets, shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
Artikolu 54
Article 54
Rappreżentanti awtorizzati tal-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Authorised representatives of providers of general-purpose AI models
1. Qabel ma jintroduċu mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali fis-suq tal-Unjoni, il-fornituri stabbiliti f'pajjiżi terzi għandhom, b'mandat bil-miktub, jaħtru rappreżentant awtorizzat li jkun stabbilit fl-Unjoni.
1. Prior to placing a general-purpose AI model on the Union market, providers established in third countries shall, by written mandate, appoint an authorised representative which is established in the Union.
2. Il-fornitur għandu jippermetti lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu jwettaq il-kompiti speċifikati fil-mandat li jirċievi mingħand il-fornitur.
2. The provider shall enable its authorised representative to perform the tasks specified in the mandate received from the provider.
3. Ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu jwettaq il-kompiti speċifikati fil-mandat li jirċievi mingħand il-fornitur. Huwa għandu jipprovdi kopja tal-mandat lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA fuq talba, b'waħda mil-lingwi uffiċjali tal-istituzzjonijiet tal-Unjoni. Għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-mandat għandu jagħti s-setgħa lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat biex iwettaq il-kompiti li ġejjin:
3. The authorised representative shall perform the tasks specified in the mandate received from the provider. It shall provide a copy of the mandate to the AI Office upon request, in one of the official languages of the institutions of the Union. For the purposes of this Regulation, the mandate shall empower the authorised representative to carry out the following tasks:
(a)
jivverifika li d-dokumentazzjoni teknika speċifikata fl-Anness XI tkun tfasslet u l-obbligi kollha msemmija fl-Artikolu 53 u, fejn applikabbli, l-Artikolu 55, ikunu ġew issodisfati mill-fornitur;
(a)
verify that the technical documentation specified in Annex XI has been drawn up and all obligations referred to in Article 53 and, where applicable, Article 55 have been fulfilled by the provider;
(b)
iżomm kopja tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika speċifikata fl-Anness XI għad-dispożizzjoni tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA u tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, għal perjodu ta' 10 snin wara li l-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jkun ġie introdott fis-suq, u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur li jkun ħatar ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat;
(b)
keep a copy of the technical documentation specified in Annex XI at the disposal of the AI Office and national competent authorities, for a period of 10 years after the general-purpose AI model has been placed on the market, and the contact details of the provider that appointed the authorised representative;
(c)
jipprovdi lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA, fuq talba motivata, bl-informazzjoni u d-dokumentazzjoni kollha, inkluż dik imsemmija fil-punt (b), meħtieġa biex tintwera l-konformità mal-obbligi f'dan il-Kapitolu;
(c)
provide the AI Office, upon a reasoned request, with all the information and documentation, including that referred to in point (b), necessary to demonstrate compliance with the obligations in this Chapter;
(d)
jikkoopera mal-Uffiċċju għall-IA u mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti, fuq talba motivata, fi kwalunkwe azzjoni li huma jieħdu fir-rigward tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, inkluż meta l-mudell jiġi integrat f'sistemi tal-IA introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz fl-Unjoni.
(d)
cooperate with the AI Office and competent authorities, upon a reasoned request, in any action they take in relation to the general-purpose AI model, including when the model is integrated into AI systems placed on the market or put into service in the Union.
4. Il-mandat għandu jagħti s-setgħa lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat li jiġi indirizzat, flimkien mal-fornitur jew minfloku, mill-Uffiċċju għall-IA jew mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti, dwar il-kwistjonijiet kollha relatati mal-iżgurar tal-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament.
4. The mandate shall empower the authorised representative to be addressed, in addition to or instead of the provider, by the AI Office or the competent authorities, on all issues related to ensuring compliance with this Regulation.
5. Ir-rappreżentant awtorizzat għandu jtemm il-mandat jekk iqis jew ikollu raġuni biex iqis li l-fornitur qed jaġixxi kontra l-obbligi tiegħu skont dan ir-Regolament. F'każ bħal dan, għandu wkoll jinforma minnufih lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA dwar it-terminazzjoni tal-mandat u r-raġunijiet għaliha.
5. The authorised representative shall terminate the mandate if it considers or has reason to consider the provider to be acting contrary to its obligations pursuant to this Regulation. In such a case, it shall also immediately inform the AI Office about the termination of the mandate and the reasons therefor.
6. L-obbligu stipulat f'dan l-Artikolu ma għandux japplika għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jiġu rilaxxati b'liċenzja libera u b’sors miftuħ li tippermetti l-aċċess, l-użu, il-modifika u d-distribuzzjoni tal-mudell, u li l-parametri tagħhom, inkluż il-piżijiet, l-informazzjoni dwar l-arkitettura tal-mudell, u l-informazzjoni dwar l-użu tal-mudell, ikunu disponibbli għall-pubbliku, dment li l-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali ma jippreżentawx riskji sistemiċi.
6. The obligation set out in this Article shall not apply to providers of general-purpose AI models that are released under a free and open-source licence that allows for the access, usage, modification, and distribution of the model, and whose parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage, are made publicly available, unless the general-purpose AI models present systemic risks.
TAQSIMA 3
SECTION 3
Obbligi tal-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku
Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
Artikolu 55
Article 55
Obbligi tal-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku
Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
1. Minbarra l-obbligi elenkati fl-Artikoli 53 u 54, il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku għandhom:
1. In addition to the obligations listed in Articles 53 and 54, providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk shall:
(a)
iwettqu evalwazzjoni tal-mudell f'konformità ma' protokolli u għodod standardizzati li jirriflettu l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku, inkluż it-twettiq u d-dokumentazzjoni tal-ittestjar kontradittorju tal-mudell bil-ħsieb li jiġu identifikati u mmitigati r-riskji sistemiċi;
(a)
perform model evaluation in accordance with standardised protocols and tools reflecting the state of the art, including conducting and documenting adversarial testing of the model with a view to identifying and mitigating systemic risks;
(b)
jivvalutaw u jimmitigaw ir-riskji sistemiċi possibbli fil-livell tal-Unjoni, inkluż is-sorsi tagħhom, li jistgħu jirriżultaw mill-iżvilupp, l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, jew l-użu ta’ mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b’riskju sistemiku;
(b)
assess and mitigate possible systemic risks at Union level, including their sources, that may stem from the development, the placing on the market, or the use of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk;
(c)
iżommu rekord ta’, jiddokumentaw u jirrapportaw, mingħajr dewmien żejjed, lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA u, kif xieraq, lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, informazzjoni rilevanti dwar inċidenti serji u miżuri korrettivi possibbli biex dawn jiġu indirizzati;
(c)
keep track of, document, and report, without undue delay, to the AI Office and, as appropriate, to national competent authorities, relevant information about serious incidents and possible corrective measures to address them;
(d)
jiżguraw livell adegwat ta' protezzjoni taċ-ċibersigurtà għall-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku u l-infrastruttura fiżika tal-mudell.
(d)
ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity protection for the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk and the physical infrastructure of the model.
2. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jistgħu jiddependu fuq kodiċijiet ta' prattika skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 56 biex juru konformità mal-obbligi stipulati fil-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu, sakemm jiġi ppubblikat standard armonizzat. Il-konformità mal-istandards armonizzati Ewropej tagħti lill-fornituri l-preżunzjoni ta’ konformità sal-punt li dawk l-istandards ikopru dawk l-obbligi. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskji sistemiċi li ma jaderixxux ma' kodiċi ta' prattika approvat jew ma jikkonformawx mal-istandard armonizzat Ewropew għandhom juru mezzi adegwati alternattivi ta' konformità għall-evalwazzjoni mill-Kummissjoni.
2. Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to the extent that those standards cover those obligations. Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks who do not adhere to an approved code of practice or do not comply with a European harmonised standard shall demonstrate alternative adequate means of compliance for assessment by the Commission.
3. Kwalunkwe informazzjoni jew dokumentazzjoni miksuba skont dan l-Artikolu, inkluż sigrieti kummerċjali, għandhom jiġu ttrattati f'konformità mal-obbligi ta' kunfidenzjalità stipulati fl-Artikolu 78.
3. Any information or documentation obtained pursuant to this Article, including trade secrets, shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
TAQSIMA 4
SECTION 4
Kodiċijiet ta’ prattika
Codes of practice
Artikolu 56
Article 56
Kodiċijiet ta' prattika
Codes of practice
1. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jħeġġeġ u jiffaċilita t-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet ta' prattika fil-livell tal-Unjoni biex jikkontribwixxi għall-applikazzjoni xierqa ta' dan ir-Regolament, filwaqt li jqis l-approċċi internazzjonali.
1. The AI Office shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of practice at Union level in order to contribute to the proper application of this Regulation, taking into account international approaches.
2. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Bord għandu jkollhom l-għan li jiżguraw li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jkopru mill-inqas l-obbligi previsti fl-Artikoli 53 u 55, inkluż il-kwistjonijiet li ġejjin:
2. The AI Office and the Board shall aim to ensure that the codes of practice cover at least the obligations provided for in Articles 53 and 55, including the following issues:
(a)
il-mezzi biex jiġi żgurat li l-informazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 53(1), il-punti (a) u (b), tinżamm aġġornata fid-dawl ta' żviluppi teknoloġiċi u tas-suq;
(a)
the means to ensure that the information referred to in Article 53(1), points (a) and (b), is kept up to date in light of market and technological developments;
(b)
il-livell adegwat ta' dettall għas-sommarju dwar il-kontenut użat għat-taħriġ;
(b)
the adequate level of detail for the summary about the content used for training;
(c)
l-identifikazzjoni tat-tip u n-natura tar-riskji sistemiċi fil-livell tal-Unjoni, inkluż is-sorsi tagħhom, fejn xieraq;
(c)
the identification of the type and nature of the systemic risks at Union level, including their sources, where appropriate;
(d)
il-miżuri, il-proċeduri u l-modalitajiet għall-valutazzjoni u l-ġestjoni tar-riskji sistemiċi fil-livell tal-Unjoni, inkluż id-dokumentazzjoni tagħhom, li għandhom ikunu proporzjonati għar-riskji, iqisu s-severità u l-probabbiltà tagħhom kif ukoll l-isfidi speċifiċi tal-indirizzar ta' dawk ir-riskji fid-dawl tal-modi possibbli li bihom dawn ir-riskji jistgħu jitfaċċaw u jimmaterjalizzaw tul il-katina tal-valur tal-IA.
(d)
the measures, procedures and modalities for the assessment and management of the systemic risks at Union level, including the documentation thereof, which shall be proportionate to the risks, take into consideration their severity and probability and take into account the specific challenges of tackling those risks in light of the possible ways in which such risks may emerge and materialise along the AI value chain.
3. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jistieden lill-fornituri kollha ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, kif ukoll lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti rilevanti, biex jipparteċipaw fit-tfassil tal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika. L-organizzazzjonijiet tas-soċjetà ċivili, l-industrija, id-dinja akkademika u partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti oħra, bħal fornituri downstream u esperti indipendenti, jistgħu jappoġġaw il-proċess.
3. The AI Office may invite all providers of general-purpose AI models, as well as relevant national competent authorities, to participate in the drawing-up of codes of practice. Civil society organisations, industry, academia and other relevant stakeholders, such as downstream providers and independent experts, may support the process.
4. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Bord għandu jkollhom l-għan li jiżguraw li l-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jistipulaw b'mod ċar l-objettivi speċifiċi tagħhom u jkun fihom impenji jew miżuri, inkluż indikaturi ewlenin tal-prestazzjoni kif xieraq, biex jiżguraw il-kisba ta' dawk l-objettivi u li jqisu kif xieraq il-ħtiġijiet u l-interessi tal-partijiet interessati kollha, inkluż il-persuni affettwati, fil-livell tal-Unjoni.
4. The AI Office and the Board shall aim to ensure that the codes of practice clearly set out their specific objectives and contain commitments or measures, including key performance indicators as appropriate, to ensure the achievement of those objectives, and that they take due account of the needs and interests of all interested parties, including affected persons, at Union level.
5. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jkollu l-għan li jiżgura li l-parteċipanti fil-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jirrapportaw lura regolarment lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA dwar l-implimentazzjoni tal-impenji u l-miżuri meħuda u l-eżiti tagħhom, inkluż kif imkejla skont l-indikaturi ewlenin tal-prestazzjoni kif xieraq. L-indikaturi ewlenin tal-prestazzjoni u l-impenji tar-rappurtar għandhom jirriflettu d-differenzi fid-daqs u fil-kapaċità bejn parteċipanti diversi.
5. The AI Office shall aim to ensure that participants to the codes of practice report regularly to the AI Office on the implementation of the commitments and the measures taken and their outcomes, including as measured against the key performance indicators as appropriate. Key performance indicators and reporting commitments shall reflect differences in size and capacity between various participants.
6. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Bord għandhom jimmonitorjaw u jevalwaw b'mod regolari l-kisba tal-objettivi tal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika mill-parteċipanti u l-kontribut tagħhom għall-applikazzjoni korretta ta' dan ir-Regolament. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Bord għandhom jivvalutaw jekk il-kodiċijiet ta' prattika jkoprux l-obbligi previsti fl-Artikoli 53 u 55, u għandhom jimmonitorjaw u jevalwaw b'mod regolari l-kisba tal-objettivi tagħhom. Għandhom jippubblikaw il-valutazzjoni tagħhom tal-adegwatezza tal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika.
6. The AI Office and the Board shall regularly monitor and evaluate the achievement of the objectives of the codes of practice by the participants and their contribution to the proper application of this Regulation. The AI Office and the Board shall assess whether the codes of practice cover the obligations provided for in Articles 53 and 55, and shall regularly monitor and evaluate the achievement of their objectives. They shall publish their assessment of the adequacy of the codes of practice.
Il-Kummissjoni tista', permezz ta' att ta' implimentazzjoni, tapprova kodiċi ta' prattika u tagħtih validità ġenerali fl-Unjoni. Dak l-att ta' implimentazzjoni għandu jiġi adottat f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
The Commission may, by way of an implementing act, approve a code of practice and give it a general validity within the Union. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
7. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jistieden lill-fornituri kollha ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali biex jaderixxu mal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika. Għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li ma jippreżentawx riskji sistemiċi din l-aderenza tista' tkun limitata għall-obbligi previsti fl-Artikolu 53, sakemm ma jiddikjarawx b'mod espliċitu l-interess tagħhom li jissieħbu fil-kodiċi sħiħ.
7. The AI Office may invite all providers of general-purpose AI models to adhere to the codes of practice. For providers of general-purpose AI models not presenting systemic risks this adherence may be limited to the obligations provided for in Article 53, unless they declare explicitly their interest to join the full code.
8. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu wkoll, kif xieraq, iħeġġeġ u jiffaċilita r-rieżami u l-adattament tal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika, b'mod partikolari fid-dawl tal-istandards emerġenti. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jassisti fil-valutazzjoni tal-istandards disponibbli.
8. The AI Office shall, as appropriate, also encourage and facilitate the review and adaptation of the codes of practice, in particular in light of emerging standards. The AI Office shall assist in the assessment of available standards.
9. Il-kodiċijiet tal-prattika għandhom ikunu lesti mhux aktar tard mit-2 ta’ Mejju 2025. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jieħu l-passi meħtieġa, inkluż li jistieden lill-fornituri skont il-paragrafu 7.
9. Codes of practice shall be ready at the latest by 2 May 2025. The AI Office shall take the necessary steps, including inviting providers pursuant to paragraph 7.
Jekk, sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025, kodiċi ta' prattika ma jkunx jista' jiġi ffinalizzat, jew jekk l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jqis li mhuwiex adegwat wara l-valutazzjoni tiegħu skont il-paragrafu 6 ta' dan l-Artikolu, il-Kummissjoni tista' tipprovdi, permezz ta' atti ta' implimentazzjoni, regoli komuni għall-implimentazzjoni tal-obbligi previsti fl-Artikoli 53 u 55, inkluż il-kwistjonijiet stipulati fil-paragrafu 2 ta' dan l-Artikolu. Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
If, by 2 August 2025, a code of practice cannot be finalised, or if the AI Office deems it is not adequate following its assessment under paragraph 6 of this Article, the Commission may provide, by means of implementing acts, common rules for the implementation of the obligations provided for in Articles 53 and 55, including the issues set out in paragraph 2 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
KAPITOLU VI
CHAPTER VI
MIŻURI LI JAPPOĠĠAW L-INNOVAZZJONI
MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION
Artikolu 57
Article 57
Ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA
AI regulatory sandboxes
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiżguraw li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti tagħhom jistabbilixxu mill-inqas ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA wieħed fil-livell nazzjonali, li għandu jkun operazzjonali sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2026. Dak l-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni jista' jiġi stabbilit ukoll b'mod konġunt mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti ta' Stati Membri oħra. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tipprovdi appoġġ tekniku, pariri u għodod għall-istabbiliment u t-tħaddim ta' ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA.
1. Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox at national level, which shall be operational by 2 August 2026. That sandbox may also be established jointly with the competent authorities of other Member States. The Commission may provide technical support, advice and tools for the establishment and operation of AI regulatory sandboxes.
L-obbligu skont l-ewwel subparagrafu jista' jiġi ssodisfat ukoll permezz tal-parteċipazzjoni f'ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni eżistenti sa fejn dik il-parteċipazzjoni tipprovdi livell ekwivalenti ta' kopertura nazzjonali għall-Istati Membri parteċipanti.
The obligation under the first subparagraph may also be fulfilled by participating in an existing sandbox in so far as that participation provides an equivalent level of national coverage for the participating Member States.
2. Jistgħu jiġu stabbiliti wkoll ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA addizzjonali fil-livell reġjonali jew lokali, jew stabbiliti b'mod konġunt mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti ta' Stati Membri oħra.
2. Additional AI regulatory sandboxes at regional or local level, or established jointly with the competent authorities of other Member States may also be established.
3. Il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data jista' jistabbilixxi wkoll ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA għall-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji u l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni, u jista' jeżerċita r-rwoli u l-kompiti tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti f'konformità ma' dan il-Kapitolu.
3. The European Data Protection Supervisor may also establish an AI regulatory sandbox for Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and may exercise the roles and the tasks of national competent authorities in accordance with this Chapter.
4. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiżguraw li l-awtoritajiet kompetenti msemmija fil-paragrafi 1 u 2 jallokaw biżżejjed riżorsi biex jikkonformaw ma' dan l-Artikolu b'mod effettiv u f'waqtu. Fejn xieraq, l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jikkooperaw ma' awtoritajiet rilevanti oħra u jistgħu jippermettu l-involviment ta' atturi oħra fl-ekosistema tal-IA. Dan l-Artikolu ma għandux jaffettwa ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja oħra stabbiliti skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiżguraw livell xieraq ta' kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtoritajiet li jissorveljaw dawk l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni l-oħra u l-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali.
4. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 allocate sufficient resources to comply with this Article effectively and in a timely manner. Where appropriate, national competent authorities shall cooperate with other relevant authorities, and may allow for the involvement of other actors within the AI ecosystem. This Article shall not affect other regulatory sandboxes established under Union or national law. Member States shall ensure an appropriate level of cooperation between the authorities supervising those other sandboxes and the national competent authorities.
5. L-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA stabbiliti skont il-paragrafu 1 għandhom jipprevedu ambjent ikkontrollat li jrawwem l-innovazzjoni u jiffaċilita l-iżvilupp, it-taħriġ, l-ittestjar u l-validazzjoni ta' sistemi innovattivi tal-IA għal żmien limitat qabel l-introduzzjoni tagħhom fis-suq jew it-tqegħid tagħhom fis-servizz skont pjan ta' ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni speċifiku miftiehem bejn il-fornituri u l-fornituri prospettivi u l-awtorità kompetenti. Tali ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni jistgħu jinkludu l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali b'superviżjoni fihom.
5. AI regulatory sandboxes established under paragraph 1 shall provide for a controlled environment that fosters innovation and facilitates the development, training, testing and validation of innovative AI systems for a limited time before their being placed on the market or put into service pursuant to a specific sandbox plan agreed between the providers or prospective providers and the competent authority. Such sandboxes may include testing in real world conditions supervised therein.
6. L-awtoritajiet kompetenti għandhom jipprovdu, kif xieraq, gwida, superviżjoni u appoġġ fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA bil-ħsieb li jidentifikaw ir-riskji, b'mod partikolari dawk għad-drittijiet fundamentali, is-saħħa u s-sikurezza, l-ittestjar, il-miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni, u l-effettività tagħhom fir-rigward tal-obbligi u r-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament u, fejn rilevanti, liġijiet oħra tal-Unjoni u liġi nazzjonali ssorveljati fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni.
6. Competent authorities shall provide, as appropriate, guidance, supervision and support within the AI regulatory sandbox with a view to identifying risks, in particular to fundamental rights, health and safety, testing, mitigation measures, and their effectiveness in relation to the obligations and requirements of this Regulation and, where relevant, other Union and national law supervised within the sandbox.
7. L-awtoritajiet kompetenti għandhom jipprovdu lill-fornituri u lill-fornituri prospettivi li jipparteċipaw fl-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA gwida dwar l-aspettattivi regolatorji u dwar kif jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament.
7. Competent authorities shall provide providers and prospective providers participating in the AI regulatory sandbox with guidance on regulatory expectations and how to fulfil the requirements and obligations set out in this Regulation.
Fuq talba tal-fornitur jew ta' fornitur prospettiv tas-sistema tal-IA, l-awtorità kompetenti għandha tipprovdi evidenza bil-miktub tal-attivitajiet imwettqa b'suċċess fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni. L-awtorità kompetenti għandha tipprovdi wkoll rapport ta' ħruġ li jagħti d-dettalji dwar l-attivitajiet imwettqa fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni u r-riżultati u l-eżiti tat-tagħlim relatati. Il-fornituri jistgħu jużaw tali dokumentazzjoni biex juru l-konformità tagħhom ma' dan ir-Regolament permezz tal-proċess ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità jew l-attivitajiet rilevanti tas-sorveljanza tas-suq. F'dan ir-rigward, ir-rapporti ta' ħruġ u l-prova bil-miktub ipprovduti mill-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jitqiesu b'mod pożittiv mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u mill-korpi notifikati, bl-għan li jiġu aċċellerati l-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità b'mod raġonevoli.
Upon request of the provider or prospective provider of the AI system, the competent authority shall provide a written proof of the activities successfully carried out in the sandbox. The competent authority shall also provide an exit report detailing the activities carried out in the sandbox and the related results and learning outcomes. Providers may use such documentation to demonstrate their compliance with this Regulation through the conformity assessment process or relevant market surveillance activities. In this regard, the exit reports and the written proof provided by the national competent authority shall be taken positively into account by market surveillance authorities and notified bodies, with a view to accelerating conformity assessment procedures to a reasonable extent.
8. Soġġett għad-dispożizzjonijiet dwar il-kunfidenzjalità fl-Artikolu 78, u bil-qbil tal-fornitur jew tal-fornitur prospettiv, il-Kummissjoni u l-Bord għandhom ikunu awtorizzati jaċċessaw ir-rapporti tal-ħruġ u għandhom iqisuhom, kif xieraq, fit-twettiq tal-kompiti tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament. Jekk kemm il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv kif ukoll l-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti jaqblu b'mod espliċitu, ir-rapport tal-ħruġ jista' jsir disponibbli għall-pubbliku permezz tal-pjattaforma unika ta' informazzjoni msemmija f'dan l-Artikolu.
8. Subject to the confidentiality provisions in Article 78, and with the agreement of the provider or prospective provider, the Commission and the Board shall be authorised to access the exit reports and shall take them into account, as appropriate, when exercising their tasks under this Regulation. If both the provider or prospective provider and the national competent authority explicitly agree, the exit report may be made publicly available through the single information platform referred to in this Article.
9. L-istabbiliment ta' ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA għandu jkollu l-għan li jikkontribwixxi għall-objettivi li ġejjin:
9. The establishment of AI regulatory sandboxes shall aim to contribute to the following objectives:
(a)
it-titjib taċ-ċertezza legali biex tinkiseb konformità regolatorja ma' dan ir-Regolament jew, fejn rilevanti, ma' liġijiet applikabbli oħra tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali;
(a)
improving legal certainty to achieve regulatory compliance with this Regulation or, where relevant, other applicable Union and national law;
(b)
l-appoġġ għall-kondiviżjoni tal-aħjar prattiki permezz ta' kooperazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet involuti fl-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA;
(b)
supporting the sharing of best practices through cooperation with the authorities involved in the AI regulatory sandbox;
(c)
it-trawwim tal-innovazzjoni u l-kompetittività u jiffaċilita l-iżvilupp ta' ekosistema tal-IA;
(c)
fostering innovation and competitiveness and facilitating the development of an AI ecosystem;
(d)
il-kontribut għal tagħlim regolatorju bbażat fuq l-evidenza;
(d)
contributing to evidence-based regulatory learning;
(e)
l-iffaċilitar u l-aċċellerazzjoni tal-aċċess tas-suq tal-Unjoni għas-sistemi tal-IA, b'mod partikolari meta jkunu pprovduti minn SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda.
(e)
facilitating and accelerating access to the Union market for AI systems, in particular when provided by SMEs, including start-ups.
10. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jiżguraw li, sa fejn is-sistemi innovattivi tal-IA jinvolvu l-ipproċessar ta' data personali jew inkella jaqgħu fil-mandat superviżorju ta' awtoritajiet nazzjonali jew awtoritajiet kompetenti oħra li jipprovdu jew jappoġġaw l-aċċess għad-data, l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tal-protezzjoni tad-data, u dawk l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali jew kompetenti l-oħra jkunu assoċjati mat-tħaddim tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja u jkunu involuti fis-superviżjoni ta' dawk l-aspetti sal-limitu tal-kompiti u s-setgħat rispettivi tagħhom.
10. National competent authorities shall ensure that, to the extent the innovative AI systems involve the processing of personal data or otherwise fall under the supervisory remit of other national authorities or competent authorities providing or supporting access to data, the national data protection authorities and those other national or competent authorities are associated with the operation of the AI regulatory sandbox and involved in the supervision of those aspects to the extent of their respective tasks and powers.
11. L-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA ma għandhomx jaffettwaw is-setgħat superviżorji jew korrettivi tal-awtoritajiet kompetenti li jissorveljaw l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni, inkluż fil-livell reġjonali jew lokali. Kwalunkwe riskju sinifikanti għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza u għad-drittijiet fundamentali identifikati matul l-iżvilupp u l-ittestjar ta' tali sistemi tal-IA għandu jirriżulta f'mitigazzjoni adegwata. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandu jkollhom is-setgħa li jissospendu temporanjament jew b'mod permanenti l-proċess tal-ittestjar, jew il-parteċipazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni jekk ma tkun possibbli l-ebda mitigazzjoni effettiva u għandhom jinformaw lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA b'din id-deċiżjoni. Dawk l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jeżerċitaw is-setgħat superviżorji tagħhom fil-limiti tal-liġi rilevanti, billi jużaw is-setgħat diskrezzjonali tagħhom meta jimplimentaw dispożizzjonijiet legali fir-rigward ta' proġett ta' ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA speċifiku, bil-għan li jappoġġaw l-innovazzjoni fl-IA fl-Unjoni.
11. The AI regulatory sandboxes shall not affect the supervisory or corrective powers of the competent authorities supervising the sandboxes, including at regional or local level. Any significant risks to health and safety and fundamental rights identified during the development and testing of such AI systems shall result in an adequate mitigation. National competent authorities shall have the power to temporarily or permanently suspend the testing process, or the participation in the sandbox if no effective mitigation is possible, and shall inform the AI Office of such decision. National competent authorities shall exercise their supervisory powers within the limits of the relevant law, using their discretionary powers when implementing legal provisions in respect of a specific AI regulatory sandbox project, with the objective of supporting innovation in AI in the Union.
12. Il-fornituri u l-fornituri prospettivi li jipparteċipaw fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA għandhom jibqgħu responsabbli skont il-liġi applikabbli tal-Unjoni u dik nazzjonali dwar ir-responsabbiltà għal kwalunkwe dannu kkawżat lil partijiet terzi bħala riżultat tal-esperimentazzjoni li sseħħ fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni. Madankollu, dment li l-fornituri prospettivi jirrispettaw il-pjan speċifiku u t-termini u l-kundizzjonijiet għall-parteċipazzjoni tagħhom u jsegwu in bona fide l-gwida mogħtija mill-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti, ma għandha tiġi imposta ebda multa amministrattiva mill-awtoritajiet għall-ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament. Fejn awtoritajiet kompetenti oħra responsabbli għal liġijiet oħra tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali kienu involuti b'mod attiv fis-superviżjoni tas-sistema tal-IA fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni u pprovdew gwida għall-konformità, ma għandha tiġi imposta l-ebda multa amministrattiva fir-rigward ta' dik il-liġi.
12. Providers and prospective providers participating in the AI regulatory sandbox shall remain liable under applicable Union and national liability law for any damage inflicted on third parties as a result of the experimentation taking place in the sandbox. However, provided that the prospective providers observe the specific plan and the terms and conditions for their participation and follow in good faith the guidance given by the national competent authority, no administrative fines shall be imposed by the authorities for infringements of this Regulation. Where other competent authorities responsible for other Union and national law were actively involved in the supervision of the AI system in the sandbox and provided guidance for compliance, no administrative fines shall be imposed regarding that law.
13. L-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA għandhom jiġu ddisinjati u jiġu implimentati b'tali mod li, fejn rilevanti, jiffaċilitaw il-kooperazzjoni transfruntiera bejn l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti.
13. The AI regulatory sandboxes shall be designed and implemented in such a way that, where relevant, they facilitate cross-border cooperation between national competent authorities.
14. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jikkoordinaw l-attivitajiet tagħhom u jikkooperaw fil-qafas tal-Bord.
14. National competent authorities shall coordinate their activities and cooperate within the framework of the Board.
15. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jinfurmaw lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA u lill-Bord dwar l-istabbiliment ta' ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni, u jistgħu jitolbuhom appoġġ u gwida. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jagħmel disponibbli għall-pubbliku lista ta' ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni ppjanati u eżistenti u jżommha aġġornata sabiex iħeġġeġ aktar interazzjoni fl-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u l-kooperazzjoni transfruntiera.
15. National competent authorities shall inform the AI Office and the Board of the establishment of a sandbox, and may ask them for support and guidance. The AI Office shall make publicly available a list of planned and existing sandboxes and keep it up to date in order to encourage more interaction in the AI regulatory sandboxes and cross-border cooperation.
16. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jissottomettu rapporti annwali lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA u lill-Bord, li jibdew sena wara l-istabbiliment tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u kull sena wara dan sat-terminazzjoni tiegħu u rapport finali. Dawk ir-rapporti għandhom jipprovdu informazzjoni dwar il-progress u r-riżultati tal-implimentazzjoni ta' dawk l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni, inkluż l-aħjar prattiki, inċidenti, tagħlimiet meħudin u rakkomandazzjonijiet dwar il-konfigurazzjoni tagħhom u, meta rilevanti, dwar l-applikazzjoni u r-reviżjoni possibbli ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż l-atti delegati u ta' implimentazzjoni tiegħu, u dwar l-applikazzjoni ta' liġijiet oħra tal-Unjoni ssorveljati mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jagħmlu dawk ir-rapporti annwali jew ir-riassunti tagħhom disponibbli għall-pubbliku, online. Il-Kummissjoni għandha, fejn xieraq, tqis ir-rapporti annwali fit-twettiq tal-kompiti tagħha skont dan ir-Regolament.
16. National competent authorities shall submit annual reports to the AI Office and to the Board, from one year after the establishment of the AI regulatory sandbox and every year thereafter until its termination, and a final report. Those reports shall provide information on the progress and results of the implementation of those sandboxes, including best practices, incidents, lessons learnt and recommendations on their setup and, where relevant, on the application and possible revision of this Regulation, including its delegated and implementing acts, and on the application of other Union law supervised by the competent authorities within the sandbox. The national competent authorities shall make those annual reports or abstracts thereof available to the public, online. The Commission shall, where appropriate, take the annual reports into account when exercising its tasks under this Regulation.
17. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżviluppa interfaċċa unika u ddedikata li jkun fiha l-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha relatata mal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA biex il-partijiet ikkonċernati jkunu jistgħu jinteraġixxu mal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u jqajmu mistoqsijiet mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti, u jfittxu gwida mhux vinkolanti dwar il-konformità ta' prodotti, servizzi u mudelli kummerċjali innovattivi li jinkorporaw teknoloġiji tal-IA, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 62(1), il-punt (c). Il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkoordina b'mod proattiv mal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, meta rilevanti.
17. The Commission shall develop a single and dedicated interface containing all relevant information related to AI regulatory sandboxes to allow stakeholders to interact with AI regulatory sandboxes and to raise enquiries with competent authorities, and to seek non-binding guidance on the conformity of innovative products, services, business models embedding AI technologies, in accordance with Article 62(1), point (c). The Commission shall proactively coordinate with national competent authorities, where relevant.
Artikolu 58
Article 58
Arranġamenti ddettaljati għall-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u l-funzjonament tagħhom
Detailed arrangements for, and functioning of, AI regulatory sandboxes
1. Biex tiġi evitata l-frammentazzjoni madwar l-Unjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni li jispeċifikaw l-arranġamenti ddettaljati għall-istabbiliment, l-iżvilupp, l-implimentazzjoni, l-operazzjoni u s-superviżjoni tal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA. L-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jinkludu prinċipji komuni dwar il-kwistjonijiet li ġejjin:
1. In order to avoid fragmentation across the Union, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the detailed arrangements for the establishment, development, implementation, operation and supervision of the AI regulatory sandboxes. The implementing acts shall include common principles on the following issues:
(a)
l-eliġibbiltà u l-kriterji tal-għażla għall-parteċipazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA;
(a)
eligibility and selection criteria for participation in the AI regulatory sandbox;
(b)
il-proċeduri għall-applikazzjoni, il-parteċipazzjoni, il-monitoraġġ, il-ħruġ mill-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u t-terminazzjoni tiegħu, inkluż il-pjan tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni u r-rapport tal-ħruġ;
(b)
procedures for the application, participation, monitoring, exiting from and termination of the AI regulatory sandbox, including the sandbox plan and the exit report;
(c)
it-termini u l-kundizzjonijiet applikabbli għall-parteċipanti.
(c)
the terms and conditions applicable to the participants.
Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
2. L-atti ta' implimentazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandhom jiżguraw:
2. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure:
(a)
li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jkunu miftuħa għal kwalunkwe fornitur jew fornitur prospettiv ta' sistema tal-IA li japplika u li jissodisfa l-kriterji tal-eliġibbiltà u tal-għażla, li għandhom ikun trasparenti u ġusti, u li l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jinfurmaw lill-applikanti bid-deċiżjoni tagħhom fi żmien tliet xhur mill-applikazzjoni;
(a)
that AI regulatory sandboxes are open to any applying provider or prospective provider of an AI system who fulfils eligibility and selection criteria, which shall be transparent and fair, and that national competent authorities inform applicants of their decision within three months of the application;
(b)
li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jippermettu aċċess wiesa' u ugwali u jlaħħqu mad-domanda għall-parteċipazzjoni; il-formituri u l-fornituri prospettivi jistgħu wkoll jippreżentaw applikazzjonijiet fi sħubijiet ma' implimentaturi u ma’ kwalunkwe parti terza rilevanti oħra;
(b)
that AI regulatory sandboxes allow broad and equal access and keep up with demand for participation; providers and prospective providers may also submit applications in partnerships with deployers and other relevant third parties;
(c)
li l-arranġamenti ddettaljati għall-ambjenti ta’ esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u l-kundizzjonijiet li jikkonċernawhom għandhom kemm jista’ jkun possibbli jappoġġaw il-flessibbiltà għall-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti biex jistabbilixxu u jħaddmu l-ambjenti ta’ esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA tagħhom;
(c)
that the detailed arrangements for, and conditions concerning AI regulatory sandboxes support, to the best extent possible, flexibility for national competent authorities to establish and operate their AI regulatory sandboxes;
(d)
li l-aċċess għall-ambjenti ta’ esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA ikun bla ħlas għall-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-kostijiet eċċezzjonali li l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jistgħu jirkupraw b’mod ġust u proporzjonat;
(d)
that access to the AI regulatory sandboxes is free of charge for SMEs, including start-ups, without prejudice to exceptional costs that national competent authorities may recover in a fair and proportionate manner;
(e)
li jiffaċilitaw lill-fornituri u lill-fornituri prospettivi, permezz tal-eżiti tat-tagħlim tal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, biex jissodisfaw l-obbligi tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità skont dan ir-Regolament u l-applikazzjoni volontarja tal-kodiċijiet ta' kondotta msemmija fl-Artikolu 95;
(e)
that they facilitate providers and prospective providers, by means of the learning outcomes of the AI regulatory sandboxes, in complying with conformity assessment obligations under this Regulation and the voluntary application of the codes of conduct referred to in Article 95;
(f)
li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jiffaċilitaw l-involviment ta' atturi rilevanti oħra fi ħdan l-ekosistema tal-IA, bħal korpi notifikati u organizzazzjonijiet tal-istandardizzazzjoni, SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda, intrapriżi, innovaturi, faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u tal-esperimentazzjoni, laboratorji tar-riċerka u tal-esperimentazzjoni u Ċentri Ewropej tal-Innovazzjoni Diġitali, ċentri ta' eċċellenza, riċerkaturi individwali, sabiex jippermettu u jiffaċilitaw il-kooperazzjoni mas-settur pubbliku u dak privat;
(f)
that AI regulatory sandboxes facilitate the involvement of other relevant actors within the AI ecosystem, such as notified bodies and standardisation organisations, SMEs, including start-ups, enterprises, innovators, testing and experimentation facilities, research and experimentation labs and European Digital Innovation Hubs, centres of excellence, individual researchers, in order to allow and facilitate cooperation with the public and private sectors;
(g)
li l-proċeduri, il-proċessi u r-rekwiżiti amministrattivi għall-applikazzjoni, l-għażla, il-parteċipazzjoni u l-ħruġ mill-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jkunu sempliċi, intelliġibbli faċilment u kkomunikati b'mod ċar sabiex tiġi ffaċilitata l-parteċipazzjoni tal-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda b'kapaċitajiet legali u amministrattivi limitati u jiġu ssimplifikati fl-Unjoni kollha, sabiex tiġi evitata l-frammentazzjoni u li l-parteċipazzjoni f'ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA stabbilita minn Stat Membru, jew mill-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data tkun rikonoxxuta b'mod reċiproku u uniformi u jkollha l-istess effetti legali fl-Unjoni kollha;
(g)
that procedures, processes and administrative requirements for application, selection, participation and exiting the AI regulatory sandbox are simple, easily intelligible, and clearly communicated in order to facilitate the participation of SMEs, including start-ups, with limited legal and administrative capacities and are streamlined across the Union, in order to avoid fragmentation and that participation in an AI regulatory sandbox established by a Member State, or by the European Data Protection Supervisor is mutually and uniformly recognised and carries the same legal effects across the Union;
(h)
li l-parteċipazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA tkun limitata għal perjodu li jkun xieraq għall-kumplessità u l-iskala tal-proġett u li tista' tiġi estiża mill-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti;
(h)
that participation in the AI regulatory sandbox is limited to a period that is appropriate to the complexity and scale of the project and that may be extended by the national competent authority;
(i)
li l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jiffaċilitaw l-iżvilupp ta' għodod u infrastruttura għall-ittestjar, għall-analiżi komparattiva, għall-valutazzjoni u għall-ispjegazzjoni tad-dimensjonijiet tas-sistemi tal-IA rilevanti għat-tagħlim regolatorju, bħall-akkuratezza, ir-robustezza u ċ-ċibersigurtà kif ukoll miżuri għall-mitigazzjoni tar-riskji għad-drittijiet fundamentali u s-soċjetà inġenerali.
(i)
that AI regulatory sandboxes facilitate the development of tools and infrastructure for testing, benchmarking, assessing and explaining dimensions of AI systems relevant for regulatory learning, such as accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity, as well as measures to mitigate risks to fundamental rights and society at large.
3. Il-fornituri prospettivi fl-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, b'mod partikolari l-SMEs u n-negozji ġodda, għandhom jiġu diretti; fejn rilevanti, lejn servizzi ta' qabel l-użu bħal gwida dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, u lejn servizzi oħra li jżidu l-valur bħal għajnuna bid-dokumenti ta' standardizzazzjoni u ċ-ċertifikazzjoni, faċilitajiet tal-ittestjar u ta' esperimentazzjoni, Ċentri Ewropej tal-Innovazzjoni Diġitali u ċentri ta' eċċellenza.
3. Prospective providers in the AI regulatory sandboxes, in particular SMEs and start-ups, shall be directed, where relevant, to pre-deployment services such as guidance on the implementation of this Regulation, to other value-adding services such as help with standardisation documents and certification, testing and experimentation facilities, European Digital Innovation Hubs and centres of excellence.
4. Meta l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jikkunsidraw li jawtorizzaw l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali sorveljati fil-qafas ta' ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA li għandu jiġi stabbilit skont dan l-Artikolu, huma għandhom jaqblu speċifikament it-termini u l-kundizzjonijiet ta' dan l-ittestjar u, b'mod partikolari, is-salvagwardji xierqa mal-parteċipanti bil-ħsieb li jiġu protetti d-drittijiet fundamentali, is-saħħa u s-sikurezza. Fejn xieraq, huma għandhom jikkooperaw ma' awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti oħra bil-ħsieb li jiġu żgurati prattiki konsistenti madwar l-Unjoni.
4. Where national competent authorities consider authorising testing in real world conditions supervised within the framework of an AI regulatory sandbox to be established under this Article, they shall specifically agree the terms and conditions of such testing and, in particular, the appropriate safeguards with the participants, with a view to protecting fundamental rights, health and safety. Where appropriate, they shall cooperate with other national competent authorities with a view to ensuring consistent practices across the Union.
Artikolu 59
Article 59
Ipproċessar ulterjuri ta' data personali għall-iżvilupp ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA fl-interess pubbliku fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA
Further processing of personal data for developing certain AI systems in the public interest in the AI regulatory sandbox
1. Fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, id-data personali miġbura legalment għal skopijiet oħra tista' tiġi pproċessata biss għall-fini tal-iżvilupp, it-taħriġ u l-ittestjar ta' ċerti sistemi tal-IA fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni meta jiġu ssodisfati l-kundizzjonijiet kollha li ġejjin:
1. In the AI regulatory sandbox, personal data lawfully collected for other purposes may be processed solely for the purpose of developing, training and testing certain AI systems in the sandbox when all of the following conditions are met:
(a)
is-sistemi tal-IA għandhom jiġu żviluppati għas-salvagwardja tal-interess pubbliku sostanzjali minn awtorità pubblika jew persuna fiżika jew ġuridika oħra u f'wieħed jew aktar mill-oqsma li ġejjin:
(a)
AI systems shall be developed for safeguarding substantial public interest by a public authority or another natural or legal person and in one or more of the following areas:
(i)
is-sikurezza pubblika u s-saħħa pubblika, inkluż l-identifikazzjoni, id-dijanjożi, il-prevenzjoni, il-kontroll u t-trattament tal-mard u titjib tas-sistemi tal-kura tas-saħħa;
(i)
public safety and public health, including disease detection, diagnosis prevention, control and treatment and improvement of health care systems;
(ii)
livell għoli ta' protezzjoni u titjib tal-kwalità tal-ambjent, il-protezzjoni tal-bijodiversità, il-protezzjoni kontra t-tniġġis, miżuri tat-tranżizzjoni ekoloġika, il-mitigazzjoni tat-tibdil fil-klima u miżuri għall-adattament għalih;
(ii)
a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment, protection of biodiversity, protection against pollution, green transition measures, climate change mitigation and adaptation measures;
(iii)
sostenibbiltà tal-enerġija;
(iii)
energy sustainability;
(iv)
is-sikurezza u r-reżiljenza tas-sistemi tat-trasport u l-mobbiltà, l-infrastruttura u n-networks kritiċi;
(iv)
safety and resilience of transport systems and mobility, critical infrastructure and networks;
(v)
l-effiċjenza u l-kwalità tal-amministrazzjoni pubblika u tas-servizzi pubbliċi;
(v)
efficiency and quality of public administration and public services;
(b)
id-data pproċessata tkun meħtieġa għall-konformità ma' wieħed jew aktar mir-rekwiżiti msemmija fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2 meta dawk ir-rekwiżiti ma jkunux jistgħu jiġu ssodisfati b'mod effettiv billi tiġi pproċessata data anonimizzata, sintetika jew data mhux personali oħra;
(b)
the data processed are necessary for complying with one or more of the requirements referred to in Chapter III, Section 2 where those requirements cannot effectively be fulfilled by processing anonymised, synthetic or other non-personal data;
(c)
ikun hemm mekkaniżmi effettivi ta' monitoraġġ biex jidentifikaw jistgħux jinħolqu xi riskji għoljin għad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tas-suġġetti tad-data, kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 35 tar-Regolament(UE) 2016/679 u fl-Artikolu 39 tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725, waqt l-esperimentazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni kif ukoll mekkaniżmi ta' rispons biex jiġu mmitigati minnufih dawk ir-riskji u, meta meħtieġ, jitwaqqaf l-ipproċessar;
(c)
there are effective monitoring mechanisms to identify if any high risks to the rights and freedoms of the data subjects, as referred to in Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, may arise during the sandbox experimentation, as well as response mechanisms to promptly mitigate those risks and, where necessary, stop the processing;
(d)
kwalunkwe data personali li għandha tiġi pproċessata fil-kuntest tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja tkun f'ambjent ta' pproċessar tad-data funzjonalment separat, iżolat u protett fil-kontroll tal-fornitur prospettiv u persuni awtorizzati biss ikollhom aċċess għal dik id-data;
(d)
any personal data to be processed in the context of the sandbox are in a functionally separate, isolated and protected data processing environment under the control of the prospective provider and only authorised persons have access to those data;
(e)
il-fornituri jistgħu jkomplu jikkondividu d-data oriġinarjament miġbura biss f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data; kwalunkwe data personali maħluqa fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni ma tistax tiġi kondiviża barra mill-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni;
(e)
providers can further share the originally collected data only in accordance with Union data protection law; any personal data created in the sandbox cannot be shared outside the sandbox;
(f)
kwalunkwe pproċessar ta' data personali fil-kuntest tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni la ma jwassal għal miżuri jew għal deċiżjonijiet li jaffettwaw lis-suġġetti tad-data u lanqas ma jaffettwa l-applikazzjoni tad-drittijiet tagħhom stabbiliti fil-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali;
(f)
any processing of personal data in the context of the sandbox neither leads to measures or decisions affecting the data subjects nor does it affect the application of their rights laid down in Union law on the protection of personal data;
(g)
kwalunkwe data personali pproċessata fil-kuntest tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni hija protetta permezz ta' miżuri tekniċi u organizzattivi u titħassar ladarba l-parteċipazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni tintemm jew id-data personali tkun laħqet it-tmiem tal-perjodu ta' żamma tagħha;
(g)
any personal data processed in the context of the sandbox are protected by means of appropriate technical and organisational measures and deleted once the participation in the sandbox has terminated or the personal data has reached the end of its retention period;
(h)
ir-reġistrazzjonijiet tal-ipproċessar ta' data personali fil-kuntest tal-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni jinżammu għad-durata tal-parteċipazzjoni fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni, sakemm ma jkunx previst mod ieħor mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali;
(h)
the logs of the processing of personal data in the context of the sandbox are kept for the duration of the participation in the sandbox, unless provided otherwise by Union or national law;
(i)
deskrizzjoni sħiħa u dettaljata tal-proċess u tar-raġunament wara t-taħriġ, l-ittestjar u l-validazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA tinżamm flimkien mar-riżultati tal-ittestjar bħala parti mid-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Anness IV;
(i)
a complete and detailed description of the process and rationale behind the training, testing and validation of the AI system is kept together with the testing results as part of the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV;
(j)
sommarju qasir tal-proġett tal-IA żviluppat fl-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni, l-objettivi tiegħu u r-riżultati mistennija huwa ppubblikat fuq is-sit web tal-awtoritajiet kompetenti; Dan l-obbligu ma għandux ikopri data operazzjonali sensittiva fir-rigward tal-attivitajiet tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil.
(j)
a short summary of the AI project developed in the sandbox, its objectives and expected results is published on the website of the competent authorities; this obligation shall not cover sensitive operational data in relation to the activities of law enforcement, border control, immigration or asylum authorities.
2. Għall-finijiet tal-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni, il-kxif jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali jew l-eżekuzzjoni ta' pieni kriminali, inkluż is-salvagwardja kontra theddid għas-sigurtà pubblika u l-prevenzjoni tiegħu, taħt il-kontroll u r-responsabbiltà tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, l-ipproċessar ta' data personali fl-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA għandu jkun ibbażat fuq liġi speċifika tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali u soġġett għall-istess kundizzjonijiet kumulattivi kif imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1.
2. For the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including safeguarding against and preventing threats to public security, under the control and responsibility of law enforcement authorities, the processing of personal data in AI regulatory sandboxes shall be based on a specific Union or national law and subject to the same cumulative conditions as referred to in paragraph 1.
3. Il-paragrafu 1 huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali li teskludi l-ipproċessar ta' data personali għal skopijiet oħra għajr għal dawk imsemmija b'mod espliċitu f'dik il-liġi, kif ukoll għal-liġijiet tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali li jistabbilixxu l-bażi għall-ipproċessar ta' data personali li hija meħtieġa għall-fini tal-iżvilupp, l-ittestjar jew it-taħriġ ta' sistemi innovattivi tal-IA jew ta' kwalunkwe bażi ġuridika oħra, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali.
3. Paragraph 1 is without prejudice to Union or national law which excludes processing of personal data for other purposes than those explicitly mentioned in that law, as well as to Union or national law laying down the basis for the processing of personal data which is necessary for the purpose of developing, testing or training of innovative AI systems or any other legal basis, in compliance with Union law on the protection of personal data.
Artikolu 60
Article 60
Ittestjar ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali barra mill-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA
Testing of high-risk AI systems in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes
1. L-ittestjar ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali barra minn ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA jista' jitwettaq mill-fornituri jew mill-fornituri prospettivi tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati fl-Anness III, f'konformità ma' dan l-Artikolu u mal-pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali msemmi f'dan l-Artikolu, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-projbizzjonijiet skont l-Artikolu 5.
1. Testing of high-risk AI systems in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes may be conducted by providers or prospective providers of high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III, in accordance with this Article and the real-world testing plan referred to in this Article, without prejudice to the prohibitions under Article 5.
Il-Kummissjoni għandha, permezz ta’ atti ta’ implimentazzjoni, tispeċifika l-elementi dettaljati tal-pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali. Dawk l-atti ta’ implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, specify the detailed elements of the real-world testing plan. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
Dan il-paragrafu għandu jkun mingħajr preġudizzju għal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali dwar l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli relatati mal-prodotti koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I.
This paragraph shall be without prejudice to Union or national law on the testing in real world conditions of high-risk AI systems related to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I.
2. Il-fornituri jew il-fornituri prospettivi jistgħu jwettqu ttestjar tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali fi kwalunkwe ħin qabel l-introduzzjoni fis-suq jew it-tqegħid fis-servizz tas-sistema tal-IA waħedhom jew fi sħubija ma' implimentatur jew implimentatur prospettiv wieħed jew aktar.
2. Providers or prospective providers may conduct testing of high-risk AI systems referred to in Annex III in real world conditions at any time before the placing on the market or the putting into service of the AI system on their own or in partnership with one or more deployers or prospective deployers.
3. L-ittestjar ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali skont dan l-Artikolu għandu jkun mingħajr preġudizzju għal kwalunkwe rieżami etiku meħtieġ mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali.
3. The testing of high-risk AI systems in real world conditions under this Article shall be without prejudice to any ethical review that is required by Union or national law.
4. Il-fornituri jew il-fornituri prospettivi jistgħu jwettqu l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali biss meta l-kundizzjonijiet kollha li ġejjin jiġu ssodisfati:
4. Providers or prospective providers may conduct the testing in real world conditions only where all of the following conditions are met:
(a)
il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv ikun fassal pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali u ppreżentah lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fl-Istat Membru fejn ser jitwettaq l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
(a)
the provider or prospective provider has drawn up a real-world testing plan and submitted it to the market surveillance authority in the Member State where the testing in real world conditions is to be conducted;
(b)
l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fl-Istat Membru fejn għandu jitwettaq l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali tkun approvat l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali u l-pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali; meta l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ma tkunx ipprovdiet tweġiba fi żmien 30 jum, l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali u l-pjan ta' ttestjar fid-dinja reali għandhom jitqiesu bħala li ġew approvati; fejn il-liġi nazzjonali ma tipprevedix approvazzjoni taċita, l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali għandu jibqa' soġġett għal awtorizzazzjoni;
(b)
the market surveillance authority in the Member State where the testing in real world conditions is to be conducted has approved the testing in real world conditions and the real-world testing plan; where the market surveillance authority has not provided an answer within 30 days, the testing in real world conditions and the real-world testing plan shall be understood to have been approved; where national law does not provide for a tacit approval, the testing in real world conditions shall remain subject to an authorisation;
(c)
il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv, bl-eċċezzjoni ta' fornituri jew fornitur prospettivi tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punti 1, 6 u 7 tal-Anness III fl-oqsma tal-infurzar tal-liġi, il-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-ġestjoni tal-kontrolli fil-fruntieri, u s-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 2 tal-Anness III jkun irreġistra l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali f’konformità mal-Artikolu 71(4) b'numru uniku ta' identifikazzjoni waħdieni għall-Unjoni kollha u bl-informazzjoni speċifikata fl-Anness IX; il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punti 1, 6 u 7 tal-Anness III fl-oqsma tal-infurzar tal-liġi, il-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-ġestjoni tal-kontrolli fil-fruntieri, ikun irreġistra l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali fit-taqsima mhux pubblika sikura tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE skont l-Artikolu 49(4), il-punt (d), b’numru uniku ta’ identifikazzjoni waħdieni għall-Unjoni kollha u bl-informazzjoni speċifikata fih; il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 2 tal-Anness III ikun irreġistra l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali f’konformità tal-Artikolu 49(5);
(c)
the provider or prospective provider, with the exception of providers or prospective providers of high-risk AI systems referred to in points 1, 6 and 7 of Annex III in the areas of law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control management, and high-risk AI systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III has registered the testing in real world conditions in accordance with Article 71(4) with a Union-wide unique single identification number and with the information specified in Annex IX; the provider or prospective provider of high-risk AI systems referred to in points 1, 6 and 7 of Annex III in the areas of law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control management, has registered the testing in real-world conditions in the secure non-public section of the EU database according to Article 49(4), point (d), with a Union-wide unique single identification number and with the information specified therein; the provider or prospective provider of high-risk AI systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III has registered the testing in real-world conditions in accordance with Article 49(5);
(d)
il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv li jwettaq l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali jkun stabbilit fl-Unjoni jew ikun ħatar rappreżentant legali li jkun stabbilit fl-Unjoni;
(d)
the provider or prospective provider conducting the testing in real world conditions is established in the Union or has appointed a legal representative who is established in the Union;
(e)
id-data miġbura u pproċessata għall-fini tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali għandha tiġi ttrasferita lejn pajjiżi terzi biss dment li jkunu implimentati salvagwardji xierqa u applikabbli skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni;
(e)
data collected and processed for the purpose of the testing in real world conditions shall be transferred to third countries only provided that appropriate and applicable safeguards under Union law are implemented;
(f)
l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali ma jdumx aktar milli meħtieġ biex jintlaħqu l-objettivi tiegħu u fi kwalunkwe każ mhux aktar minn sitt xhur, li jistgħu jiġu estiżi għal perjodu ta' sitt xhur oħra, soġġett għal notifika minn qabel mill-fornitur jew mill-fornitur prospettiv lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, akkumpanjat minn spjegazzjoni dwar il-ħtieġa għal tali estensjoni;
(f)
the testing in real world conditions does not last longer than necessary to achieve its objectives and in any case not longer than six months, which may be extended for an additional period of six months, subject to prior notification by the provider or prospective provider to the market surveillance authority, accompanied by an explanation of the need for such an extension;
(g)
is-suġġetti tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali li huma persuni li jagħmlu parti minn gruppi vulnerabbli minħabba l-età, id-diżabbiltà tagħhom, huma protetti kif xieraq;
(g)
the subjects of the testing in real world conditions who are persons belonging to vulnerable groups due to their age or disability, are appropriately protected;
(h)
meta fornitur jew fornitur prospettiv jorganizza l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali f'kooperazzjoni ma' implimentatur jew implimentatur prospettiv wieħed jew aktar, dawn tal-aħħar ikunu ġew infurmati dwar l-aspetti kollha tal-ittestjar li huma rilevanti għad-deċiżjoni tagħhom li jipparteċipaw, u mogħtija l-istruzzjonijiet rilevanti dwar l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 13; il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv u l-implimentatur jew l-implimentatur prospettiv għandhom jikkonkludu ftehim li jispeċifika r-rwoli u r-responsabbiltajiet tagħhom bil-ħsieb li tiġi żgurata l-konformità mad-dispożizzjonijiet għall-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali skont dan ir-Regolament u skont liġijiet applikabbli oħra tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali;
(h)
where a provider or prospective provider organises the testing in real world conditions in cooperation with one or more deployers or prospective deployers, the latter have been informed of all aspects of the testing that are relevant to their decision to participate, and given the relevant instructions for use of the AI system referred to in Article 13; the provider or prospective provider and the deployer or prospective deployer shall conclude an agreement specifying their roles and responsibilities with a view to ensuring compliance with the provisions for testing in real world conditions under this Regulation and under other applicable Union and national law;
(i)
is-suġġetti tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali taw kunsens infurmat f'konformità mal-Artikolu 61, jew fil-każ tal-infurzar tal-liġi, meta t-tiftix ta' kunsens infurmat jipprevjeni li s-sistema tal-IA tiġi ttestjata, l-ittestjar innifsu u l-eżitu tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali ma għandu jkollhom ebda effett negattiv fuq is-suġġetti u d-data personali tagħhom għandha titħassar wara li jkun twettaq it-test;
(i)
the subjects of the testing in real world conditions have given informed consent in accordance with Article 61, or in the case of law enforcement, where the seeking of informed consent would prevent the AI system from being tested, the testing itself and the outcome of the testing in the real world conditions shall not have any negative effect on the subjects, and their personal data shall be deleted after the test is performed;
(j)
l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali huwa ssorveljat b'mod effettiv mill-fornitur jew mill-fornitur prospettiv, kif ukoll mill-implimentaturi jew l-implimentaturi prospettivi permezz ta' persuni li huma kkwalifikati kif xieraq fil-qasam rilevanti u li għandhom il-kapaċità, it-taħriġ u l-awtorità meħtieġa biex iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom;
(j)
the testing in real world conditions is effectively overseen by the provider or prospective provider, as well as by deployers or prospective deployers through persons who are suitably qualified in the relevant field and have the necessary capacity, training and authority to perform their tasks;
(k)
il-previżjonijiet, ir-rakkomandazzjonijiet jew id-deċiżjonijiet tas-sistema tal-IA jistgħu jitreġġgħu lura u jiġu injorati b'mod effettiv.
(k)
the predictions, recommendations or decisions of the AI system can be effectively reversed and disregarded.
5. Is-suġġetti tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali, jew ir-rappreżentant iddeżinjat legalment tagħhom, kif xieraq, jistgħu, mingħajr ebda detriment li jirriżulta u mingħajr ma jkollhom għalfejn jipprovdu xi ġustifikazzjoni, jirtiraw mill-ittestjar fi kwalunkwe ħin billi jirrevokaw il-kunsens infurmat tagħhom u jistgħu jitolbu t-tħassir immedjat u permanenti tad-data personali tagħhom. L-irtirar tal-kunsens infurmat ma għandux jaffettwa l-attivitajiet diġà mwettqa.
5. Any subjects of the testing in real world conditions, or their legally designated representative, as appropriate, may, without any resulting detriment and without having to provide any justification, withdraw from the testing at any time by revoking their informed consent and may request the immediate and permanent deletion of their personal data. The withdrawal of the informed consent shall not affect the activities already carried out.
6. F'konformità mal-Artikolu 75, l-Istati Membri għandhom jagħtu lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tagħhom is-setgħat li jirrikjedu lill-fornituri u lill-fornituri prospettivi biex jipprovdu informazzjoni, li jwettqu spezzjonijiet mill-bogħod jew fuq il-post għal għarrieda u li jwettqu kontrolli fuq it-twettiq tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali u s-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli relatati. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jużaw dawk is-setgħat biex jiżguraw l-iżvilupp sikur tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali.
6. In accordance with Article 75, Member States shall confer on their market surveillance authorities the powers of requiring providers and prospective providers to provide information, of carrying out unannounced remote or on-site inspections, and of performing checks on the conduct of the testing in real world conditions and the related high-risk AI systems. Market surveillance authorities shall use those powers to ensure the safe development of testing in real world conditions.
7. Kwalunkwe inċident serju identifikat matul l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali għandu jiġi rrappurtat lill-awtorità nazzjonali tas-sorveljanza tas-suq skont l-Artikolu 73. Il-fornitur jew fornitur prospettiv għandu jadotta miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni immedjati jew, fin-nuqqas ta' dan, għandu jissospendi l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali sakemm isseħħ tali mitigazzjoni jew inkella jtemmu. Il-fornitur jew fornitur prospettiv għandu jistabbilixxi proċedura biex isejjaħ lura fil-pront is-sistema tal-IA mat-tali terminazzjoni tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali.
7. Any serious incident identified in the course of the testing in real world conditions shall be reported to the national market surveillance authority in accordance with Article 73. The provider or prospective provider shall adopt immediate mitigation measures or, failing that, shall suspend the testing in real world conditions until such mitigation takes place, or otherwise terminate it. The provider or prospective provider shall establish a procedure for the prompt recall of the AI system upon such termination of the testing in real world conditions.
8. Il-fornituri jew il-fornituri prospettivi għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-awtorità nazzjonali tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fl-Istat Membru fejn l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali għandu jitwettaq bis-sospensjoni jew it-terminazzjoni tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali u tal-eżiti finali.
8. Providers or prospective providers shall notify the national market surveillance authority in the Member State where the testing in real world conditions is to be conducted of the suspension or termination of the testing in real world conditions and of the final outcomes.
9. Il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv għandu jkun responsabbli skont il-liġijiet applikabbli tal-Unjoni u nazzjonali dwar ir-responsabbiltà għal kwalunkwe dannu kkawżat matul l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali.
9. The provider or prospective provider shall be liable under applicable Union and national liability law for any damage caused in the course of their testing in real world conditions.
Artikolu 61
Article 61
Kunsens infurmat għall-parteċipazzjoni fl-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali barra mill-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA
Informed consent to participate in testing in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes
1. Għall-fini tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali skont l-Artikolu 60, għandu jinkiseb kunsens infurmat mogħti liberament mis-suġġetti tal-ittestjar qabel il-parteċipazzjoni tagħhom f'tali ttestjar u wara li jkunu ġew infurmati kif xieraq b'informazzjoni konċiża, ċara, rilevanti u li tinftiehem dwar:
1. For the purpose of testing in real world conditions under Article 60, freely-given informed consent shall be obtained from the subjects of testing prior to their participation in such testing and after their having been duly informed with concise, clear, relevant, and understandable information regarding:
(a)
in-natura u l-objettivi tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali u l-inkonvenjenza possibbli li tista' tkun marbuta mal-parteċipazzjoni tagħhom;
(a)
the nature and objectives of the testing in real world conditions and the possible inconvenience that may be linked to their participation;
(b)
il-kundizzjonijiet li skonthom għandu jitwettaq l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali, inkluż it-tul ta' żmien mistenni tal-parteċipazzjoni tas-suġġett jew tas-suġġetti;
(b)
the conditions under which the testing in real world conditions is to be conducted, including the expected duration of the subject or subjects’ participation;
(c)
id-drittijiet tagħhom u l-garanziji dwar il-parteċipazzjoni tagħhom, b'mod partikolari d-dritt tagħhom li jirrifjutaw li jipparteċipaw u d-dritt li jirtiraw mill-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali fi kwalunkwe ħin mingħajr ma jirriżulta xi preġudizzju u mingħajr ma jkollhom għalfejn jipprovdu xi ġustifikazzjoni;
(c)
their rights, and the guarantees regarding their participation, in particular their right to refuse to participate in, and the right to withdraw from, testing in real world conditions at any time without any resulting detriment and without having to provide any justification;
(d)
l-arranġamenti biex jintalab it-treġġigħ lura jew in-nuqqas ta' kunsiderazzjoni tal-previżjonijiet, ir-rakkomandazzjonijiet jew id-deċiżjonijiet tas-sistema tal-IA;
(d)
the arrangements for requesting the reversal or the disregarding of the predictions, recommendations or decisions of the AI system;
(e)
in-numru uniku ta' identifikazzjoni waħdieni għall-Unjoni kollha tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali f'konformità mal-Artikolu 60(4) il-punt (c), u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur jew tar-rappreżentant legali tiegħu li mingħandu tista' tinkiseb aktar informazzjoni.
(e)
the Union-wide unique single identification number of the testing in real world conditions in accordance with Article 60(4) point (c), and the contact details of the provider or its legal representative from whom further information can be obtained.
2. Il-kunsens infurmat għandu jkun datat u dokumentat u għandha tingħata kopja lis-suġġetti tal-ittestjar jew lir-rappreżentant legali tagħhom.
2. The informed consent shall be dated and documented and a copy shall be given to the subjects of testing or their legal representative.
Artikolu 62
Article 62
Miżuri għall-fornituri u għall-implimentaturi, b'mod partikolari l-SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda
Measures for providers and deployers, in particular SMEs, including start-ups
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom iwettqu l-azzjonijiet li ġejjin:
1. Member States shall undertake the following actions:
(a)
jipprovdu lill-SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda, li għandhom uffiċċju rreġistrat jew fergħa fl-Unjoni, b'aċċess prijoritarju għall-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, sa fejn jissodisfaw il-kriterji tal-eliġibbiltà u tal-għażla; l-aċċess prijoritarju ma għandux jipprekludi lil SMEs oħra inkluż negozji ġodda għajr dawk imsemmija f’dan il-paragrafu milli jaċċessaw l-ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA, dment li jissodisfaw ukoll il-kundizzjonijiet tal-eliġibbiltà u l-kriterji tal-għażla;
(a)
provide SMEs, including start-ups, having a registered office or a branch in the Union, with priority access to the AI regulatory sandboxes, to the extent that they fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria; the priority access shall not preclude other SMEs, including start-ups, other than those referred to in this paragraph from access to the AI regulatory sandbox, provided that they also fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria;
(b)
jorganizzaw attivitajiet speċifiċi ta' sensibilizzazzjoni u ta' taħriġ dwar l-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament imfassla għall-ħtiġijiet tal-SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda, l-implimentaturi u, kif xieraq, l-awtoritajiet pubbliċi lokali;
(b)
organise specific awareness raising and training activities on the application of this Regulation tailored to the needs of SMEs including start-ups, deployers and, as appropriate, local public authorities;
(c)
jużaw mezzi ddedikati eżistenti u fejn xieraq, jistabbilixxu mezzi ġodda għall-komunikazzjoni mal-SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda, implimentaturi, innovaturi oħra u, kif xieraq, mal-awtoritajiet pubbliċi lokali biex jipprovdu pariri u jwieġbu għal mistoqsijiet dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż fir-rigward tal-parteċipazzjoni f'ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA;
(c)
utilise existing dedicated channels and where appropriate, establish new ones for communication with SMEs including start-ups, deployers, other innovators and, as appropriate, local public authorities to provide advice and respond to queries about the implementation of this Regulation, including as regards participation in AI regulatory sandboxes;
(d)
jiffaċilitaw il-parteċipazzjoni tal-SMEs u ta' partijiet ikkonċernati rilevanti oħra fil-proċess tal-iżvilupp tal-istandardizzazzjoni.
(d)
facilitate the participation of SMEs and other relevant stakeholders in the standardisation development process.
2. L-interessi u l-ħtiġijiet speċifiċi tal-fornituri SME, inkluż negozji ġodda, għandhom jitqiesu meta jiġu stabbiliti t-tariffi għal valutazzjoni tal-konformità skont l-Artikolu 43, u jitnaqqsu dawk it-tariffi b'mod proporzjonat għad-daqs tagħhom, id-daqs tas-suq tagħhom u indikaturi rilevanti oħra.
2. The specific interests and needs of the SME providers, including start-ups, shall be taken into account when setting the fees for conformity assessment under Article 43, reducing those fees proportionately to their size, market size and other relevant indicators.
3. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jwettaq l-azzjonijiet li ġejjin:
3. The AI Office shall undertake the following actions:
(a)
jipprovdi mudelli standardizzati għall-oqsma koperti minn dan ir-Regolament, kif speċifikat mill-Bord fit-talba tiegħu;
(a)
provide standardised templates for areas covered by this Regulation, as specified by the Board in its request;
(b)
jiżviluppa u jżomm pjattaforma unika ta' informazzjoni li tipprovdi informazzjoni faċli biex tintuża b'rabta ma' dan ir-Regolament għall-operaturi kollha madwar l-Unjoni;
(b)
develop and maintain a single information platform providing easy to use information in relation to this Regulation for all operators across the Union;
(c)
jorganizza kampanji ta' komunikazzjoni xierqa biex iqajjem kuxjenza dwar l-obbligi li jirriżultaw minn dan ir-Regolament;
(c)
organise appropriate communication campaigns to raise awareness about the obligations arising from this Regulation;
(d)
jevalwa u jippromwovi l-konverġenza tal-aħjar prattiki fil-proċeduri tal-akkwist pubbliku fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA.
(d)
evaluate and promote the convergence of best practices in public procurement procedures in relation to AI systems.
Artikolu 63
Article 63
Derogi għal operaturi speċifiċi
Derogations for specific operators
1. Il-mikrointrapriżi skont it-tifsira tar-Rakkomandazzjoni 2003/361/KE jistgħu jikkonformaw ma' ċerti elementi tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità meħtieġa mill-Artikolu 17 ta' dan ir-Regolament b'mod simplifikat dment li ma jkollhomx intrapriżi sħab jew intrapriżi relatati skont it-tifsira ta' dik ir-Rakkomandazzjoni. Għal dak il-għan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżviluppa linji gwida dwar l-elementi tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità li tista' ssir konformità magħhom b'mod simplifikat meta jitqiesu l-ħtiġijiet tal-mikrointrapriżi mingħajr ma jiġu affettwati l-livell ta' protezzjoni jew il-ħtieġa ta' konformità mar-rekwiżiti fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli.
1. Microenterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC may comply with certain elements of the quality management system required by Article 17 of this Regulation in a simplified manner, provided that they do not have partner enterprises or linked enterprises within the meaning of that Recommendation. For that purpose, the Commission shall develop guidelines on the elements of the quality management system which may be complied with in a simplified manner considering the needs of microenterprises, without affecting the level of protection or the need for compliance with the requirements in respect of high-risk AI systems.
2. Il-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu ma għandux jiġi interpretat bħala li jeżenta lil dawk l-operaturi milli jissodisfaw kwalunkwe rekwiżit jew obbligu ieħor stabbilit f'dan ir-Regolament, inkluż dawk stabbiliti fl-Artikoli 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 72 u 73.
2. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be interpreted as exempting those operators from fulfilling any other requirements or obligations laid down in this Regulation, including those established in Articles 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 72 and 73.
KAPITOLU VII
CHAPTER VII
GOVERNANZA
GOVERNANCE
TAQSIMA 1
SECTION 1
Governanza fil-livell tal-Unjoni
Governance at Union level
Artikolu 64
Article 64
Uffiċċju għall-IA
AI Office
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżviluppa l-kompetenza esperta u l-kapaċitajiet tal-Unjoni fil-qasam tal-IA permezz tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA.
1. The Commission shall develop Union expertise and capabilities in the field of AI through the AI Office.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiffaċilitaw il-kompiti fdati lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA, kif rifless f'dan ir-Regolament.
2. Member States shall facilitate the tasks entrusted to the AI Office, as reflected in this Regulation.
Artikolu 65
Article 65
Stabbiliment u struttura tal-Bord Ewropew għall-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali
Establishment and structure of the European Artificial Intelligence Board
1. B'dan huwa stabbilit Bord Ewropew għall-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali (il-“Bord”).
1. A European Artificial Intelligence Board (the ‘Board’) is hereby established.
2. Il-Bord għandu jkun magħmul minn rappreżentant wieħed għal kull Stat Membru. Il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data għandu jipparteċipa bħala osservatur. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jattendi wkoll il-laqgħat tal-Bord mingħajr ma jieħu sehem fil-votazzjonijiet. Awtoritajiet, korpi jew esperti nazzjonali u tal-Unjoni oħrajn jistgħu jiġu mistiedna għal-laqgħat mill-Bord fuq bażi ta' każ b'każ, fejn il-kwistjonijiet diskussi jkunu ta' rilevanza għalihom.
2. The Board shall be composed of one representative per Member State. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall participate as observer. The AI Office shall also attend the Board’s meetings, without taking part in the votes. Other national and Union authorities, bodies or experts may be invited to the meetings by the Board on a case by case basis, where the issues discussed are of relevance for them.
3. Kull rappreżentant għandu jiġi ddeżinjat mill-Istat Membru tiegħu għal perjodu ta' tliet snin, li jista' jiġġedded darba.
3. Each representative shall be designated by their Member State for a period of three years, renewable once.
4. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiżguraw li r-rappreżentanti tagħhom fil-Bord:
4. Member States shall ensure that their representatives on the Board:
(a)
ikollhom il-kompetenzi u s-setgħat rilevanti fl-Istat Membru tagħhom sabiex jikkontribwixxu b'mod attiv għall-kisba tal-kompiti tal-Bord imsemmija fl-Artikolu 66;
(a)
have the relevant competences and powers in their Member State so as to contribute actively to the achievement of the Board’s tasks referred to in Article 66;
(b)
jiġu ddeżinjati bħala punt ta' kuntatt uniku vis-à-vis il-Bord u, fejn xieraq, b'kont meħud tal-ħtiġijiet tal-Istati Membri, bħala punt ta' kuntatt uniku għall-partijiet ikkonċernati;
(b)
are designated as a single contact point vis-à-vis the Board and, where appropriate, taking into account Member States’ needs, as a single contact point for stakeholders;
(c)
jingħataw is-setgħa li jiffaċilitaw il-konsistenza u l-koordinazzjoni bejn l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti fl-Istat Membru tagħhom fir-rigward tal-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż permezz tal-ġbir ta' data u informazzjoni rilevanti bl-għan li jwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom fuq il-Bord.
(c)
are empowered to facilitate consistency and coordination between national competent authorities in their Member State as regards the implementation of this Regulation, including through the collection of relevant data and information for the purpose of fulfilling their tasks on the Board.
5. Ir-rappreżentanti ddeżinjati tal-Istati Membri għandhom jadottaw ir-regoli ta' proċedura tal-Bord b'maġġoranza ta' żewġ terzi. Ir-regoli ta' proċedura għandhom, b'mod partikolari, jistabbilixxu proċeduri għall-proċess tal-għażla, id-durata tal-mandat u l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tal-kompiti tal-President, l-arranġamenti ddettaljati tal-votazzjoni, u l-organizzazzjoni tal-attivitajiet tal-Bord u dawk tas-sottogruppi tiegħu.
5. The designated representatives of the Member States shall adopt the Board’s rules of procedure by a two-thirds majority. The rules of procedure shall, in particular, lay down procedures for the selection process, the duration of the mandate of, and specifications of the tasks of, the Chair, detailed arrangements for voting, and the organisation of the Board’s activities and those of its sub-groups.
6. Il-Bord għandu jistabbilixxi żewġ sottogruppi permanenti biex jipprovdu pjattaforma għall-kooperazzjoni u l-iskambju fost l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u jinnotifikaw lill-awtoritajiet dwar kwistjonijiet relatati mas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-korpi notifikati rispettivament.
6. The Board shall establish two standing sub-groups to provide a platform for cooperation and exchange among market surveillance authorities and notifying authorities about issues related to market surveillance and notified bodies respectively.
Jenħtieġ li s-sottogrupp permanenti għas-sorveljanza tas-suq jaġixxi bħala l-grupp ta' kooperazzjoni amministrattiva (ADCO) għal dan ir-Regolament skont it-tifsira tal-Artikolu 30 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020.
The standing sub-group for market surveillance should act as the administrative cooperation group (ADCO) for this Regulation within the meaning of Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
Il-Bord jista' jistabbilixxi sottogruppi permanenti jew temporanji oħra kif xieraq għall-fini tal-eżaminazzjoni ta' kwistjonijiet speċifiċi. Fejn xieraq, rappreżentanti tal-forum konsultattiv imsemmi fl-Artikolu 67 jistgħu jiġu mistiedna għal tali sottogruppi jew għal laqgħat speċifiċi ta' dawk is-sottogruppi bħala osservaturi.
The Board may establish other standing or temporary sub-groups as appropriate for the purpose of examining specific issues. Where appropriate, representatives of the advisory forum referred to in Article 67 may be invited to such sub-groups or to specific meetings of those subgroups as observers.
7. Il-Bord għandu jkun organizzat u mħaddem b'tali mod li jissalvagwardja l-oġġettività u l-imparzjalità tal-attivitajiet tiegħu.
7. The Board shall be organised and operated so as to safeguard the objectivity and impartiality of its activities.
8. Il-Bord għandu jkun ippresedut minn wieħed mir-rappreżentanti tal-Istati Membri. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jipprovdi s-segretarjat għall-Bord, isejjaħ il-laqgħat fuq talba tal-President, u jħejji l-aġenda f'konformità mal-kompiti tal-Bord skont dan ir-Regolament u r-regoli ta' proċedura tiegħu.
8. The Board shall be chaired by one of the representatives of the Member States. The AI Office shall provide the secretariat for the Board, convene the meetings upon request of the Chair, and prepare the agenda in accordance with the tasks of the Board pursuant to this Regulation and its rules of procedure.
Artikolu 66
Article 66
Kompiti tal-Bord
Tasks of the Board
Il-Bord għandu jipprovdi pariri u jassisti lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri sabiex tiġi ffaċilitata l-applikazzjoni konsistenti u effettiva ta' dan ir-Regolament. Għal dak il-għan, il-Bord jista' b'mod partikolari:
The Board shall advise and assist the Commission and the Member States in order to facilitate the consistent and effective application of this Regulation. To that end, the Board may in particular:
(a)
jikkontribwixxi għall-koordinazzjoni fost l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti responsabbli għall-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament u, f'kooperazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ikkonċernati u soġġett għall-qbil tagħhom, jappoġġa attivitajiet konġunti tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq imsemmija fl-Artikolu 74(11);
(a)
contribute to the coordination among national competent authorities responsible for the application of this Regulation and, in cooperation with and subject to the agreement of the market surveillance authorities concerned, support joint activities of market surveillance authorities referred to in Article 74(11);
(b)
jiġbor u jikkondividi l-kompetenza esperta teknika u regolatorja u l-aħjar prattiki fost l-Istati Membri;
(b)
collect and share technical and regulatory expertise and best practices among Member States;
(c)
jipprovdi pariri dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-infurzar tar-regoli dwar il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali;
(c)
provide advice on the implementation of this Regulation, in particular as regards the enforcement of rules on general-purpose AI models;
(d)
jikkontribwixxi għall-armonizzazzjoni tal-prattiki amministrattivi fl-Istati Membri, inkluż fir-rigward tad-deroga mill-proċeduri ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità msemmija fl-Artikolu 46, il-funzjonament tal-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali msemmija fl-Artikoli 57, 59 u 60;
(d)
contribute to the harmonisation of administrative practices in the Member States, including in relation to the derogation from the conformity assessment procedures referred to in Article 46, the functioning of AI regulatory sandboxes, and testing in real world conditions referred to in Articles 57, 59 and 60;
(e)
fuq talba tal-Kummissjoni jew fuq inizjattiva proprja, joħroġ rakkomandazzjonijiet u opinjonijiet bil-miktub dwar kwalunkwe kwistjoni rilevanti relatata mal-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament u mal-applikazzjoni konsistenti u effettiva tiegħu, inkluż:
(e)
at the request of the Commission or on its own initiative, issue recommendations and written opinions on any relevant matters related to the implementation of this Regulation and to its consistent and effective application, including:
(i)
dwar l-iżvilupp u l-applikazzjoni ta' kodiċijiet ta' kondotta u kodiċijiet ta' prattika skont dan ir-Regolament kif ukoll il-linji gwida tal-Kummissjoni;
(i)
on the development and application of codes of conduct and codes of practice pursuant to this Regulation, as well as of the Commission’s guidelines;
(ii)
l-evalwazzjoni u r-rieżami ta' dan ir-Regolament skont l-Artikolu 112, inkluż fir-rigward tar-rapporti dwar inċidenti serji msemmija fl-Artikolu 73 l-funzjonament tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71, it-tħejjija tal-atti delegati jew ta' implimentazzjoni, u fir-rigward ta' allinjamenti possibbli ta' dan ir-Regolament mal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I;
(ii)
the evaluation and review of this Regulation pursuant to Article 112, including as regards the serious incident reports referred to in Article 73, and the functioning of the EU database referred to in Article 71, the preparation of the delegated or implementing acts, and as regards possible alignments of this Regulation with the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I;
(iii)
dwar l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi jew l-istandards eżistenti rigward ir-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2;
(iii)
on technical specifications or existing standards regarding the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2;
(iv)
dwar l-użu ta' standards armonizzati jew ta' speċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fl-Artikoli 40 u 41;
(iv)
on the use of harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41;
(v)
xejriet, bħall-kompetittività globali Ewropea fl-IA, l-użu tal-IA fl-Unjoni, u l-iżvilupp tal-ħiliet diġitali;
(v)
trends, such as European global competitiveness in AI, the uptake of AI in the Union, and the development of digital skills;
(vi)
xejriet dwar it-tipoloġija li dejjem tevolvi tal-ktajjen tal-valur tal-IA, b'mod partikolari dwar l-implikazzjonijiet li jirriżultaw f'termini tar-responsabbiltà;
(vi)
trends on the evolving typology of AI value chains, in particular on the resulting implications in terms of accountability;
(vii)
dwar il-ħtieġa potenzjali għal emenda tal-Anness III f'konformità mal-Artikolu 7 u dwar il-ħtieġa potenzjali għal reviżjoni possibbli tal-Artikolu 5 skont l-Artikolu 112, filwaqt li jqis l-evidenza disponibbli rilevanti u l-aħħar żviluppi fit-teknoloġija;
(vii)
on the potential need for amendment to Annex III in accordance with Article 7, and on the potential need for possible revision of Article 5 pursuant to Article 112, taking into account relevant available evidence and the latest developments in technology;
(f)
jappoġġa lill-Kummissjoni fil-promozzjoni tal-litteriżmu fl-IA, is-sensibilizzazzjoni u l-fehim tal-pubbliku dwar il-benefiċċji, ir-riskji, is-salvagwardji u d-drittijiet u l-obbligi fir-rigward tal-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA;
(f)
support the Commission in promoting AI literacy, public awareness and understanding of the benefits, risks, safeguards and rights and obligations in relation to the use of AI systems;
(g)
jiffaċilita l-iżvilupp ta' kriterji komuni u fehim kondiviż fost l-operaturi tas-suq u l-awtoritajiet kompetenti tal-kunċetti rilevanti previsti f'dan ir-Regolament, inkluż billi jikkontribwixxi għall-iżvilupp ta' parametri referenzjarji;
(g)
facilitate the development of common criteria and a shared understanding among market operators and competent authorities of the relevant concepts provided for in this Regulation, including by contributing to the development of benchmarks;
(h)
jikkoopera, kif xieraq, ma' istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji u aġenziji tal-Unjoni, kif ukoll ma' gruppi ta' esperti u networks rilevanti tal-UE, b'mod partikolari fl-oqsma tas-sikurezza tal-prodotti, iċ-ċibersigurtà, il-kompetizzjoni, is-servizzi diġitali u tal-media, is-servizzi finanzjarji, il-protezzjoni tal-konsumatur, u l-protezzjoni tad-data u tad-drittijiet fundamentali;
(h)
cooperate, as appropriate, with other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, as well as relevant Union expert groups and networks, in particular in the fields of product safety, cybersecurity, competition, digital and media services, financial services, consumer protection, data and fundamental rights protection;
(i)
jikkontribwixxi għal kooperazzjoni effettiva mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti ta' pajjiżi terzi u ma' organizzazzjonijiet internazzjonali;
(i)
contribute to effective cooperation with the competent authorities of third countries and with international organisations;
(j)
jassisti lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti u lill-Kummissjoni fl-iżvilupp tal-kompetenza esperta organizzattiva u teknika meħtieġa għall-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, inkluż billi jikkontribwixxi għall-valutazzjoni tal-ħtiġijiet ta' taħriġ għall-persunal tal-Istati Membri involuti fl-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament;
(j)
assist national competent authorities and the Commission in developing the organisational and technical expertise required for the implementation of this Regulation, including by contributing to the assessment of training needs for staff of Member States involved in implementing this Regulation;
(k)
jassisti lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA fl-appoġġ lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti fl-istabbiliment u l-iżvilupp ta' ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA u jiffaċilita l-kooperazzjoni u l-kondiviżjoni tal-informazzjoni fost l-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA;
(k)
assist the AI Office in supporting national competent authorities in the establishment and development of AI regulatory sandboxes, and facilitate cooperation and information-sharing among AI regulatory sandboxes;
(l)
jikkontribwixxi għall-iżvilupp ta' dokumenti ta' gwida u jagħti pariri rilevanti dwarhom;
(l)
contribute to, and provide relevant advice on, the development of guidance documents;
(m)
jagħti pariri lill-Kummissjoni fir-rigward ta' kwistjonijiet internazzjonali dwar l-IA;
(m)
advise the Commission in relation to international matters on AI;
(n)
jipprovdi opinjonijiet lill-Kummissjoni dwar l-allerti kwalifikati rigward mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali;
(n)
provide opinions to the Commission on the qualified alerts regarding general-purpose AI models;
(o)
jirċievi opinjonijiet mill-Istati Membri dwar allerti kwalifikati rigward mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u dwar l-esperjenzi u l-prattiki nazzjonali dwar il-monitoraġġ u l-infurzar ta' sistemi tal-IA, b'mod partikolari s-sistemi li jintegraw il-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali.
(o)
receive opinions by the Member States on qualified alerts regarding general-purpose AI models, and on national experiences and practices on the monitoring and enforcement of AI systems, in particular systems integrating the general-purpose AI models.
Artikolu 67
Article 67
Forum Konsultattiv
Advisory forum
1. Għandu jiġi stabbilit forum konsultattiv biex jipprovdi kompetenza esperta teknika u jagħti pariri lill-Bord u lill-Kummissjoni, u biex jikkontribwixxi għall-kompiti tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament.
1. An advisory forum shall be established to provide technical expertise and advise the Board and the Commission, and to contribute to their tasks under this Regulation.
2. Is-sħubija tal-forum konsultattiv għandha tirrappreżenta għażla bbilanċjata ta' partijiet ikkonċernati, inkluż l-industrija, in-negozji ġodda, l-SMEs, is-soċjetà ċivili, is-sħab soċjali u d-dinja akkademika. Is-sħubija tal-forum konsultattiv għandha tkun ibbilanċjata fir-rigward tal-interessi kummerċjali u mhux kummerċjali u, fil-kategorija tal-interessi kummerċjali, fir-rigward tal-SMEs u impriżi oħra.
2. The membership of the advisory forum shall represent a balanced selection of stakeholders, including industry, start-ups, SMEs, civil society and academia. The membership of the advisory forum shall be balanced with regard to commercial and non-commercial interests and, within the category of commercial interests, with regard to SMEs and other undertakings.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha taħtar il-membri tal-forum konsultattiv, f'konformità mal-kriterji stipulati fil-paragrafu 2, minn fost partijiet ikkonċernati b'kompetenza esperta rikonoxxuta fil-qasam tal-IA.
3. The Commission shall appoint the members of the advisory forum, in accordance with the criteria set out in paragraph 2, from amongst stakeholders with recognised expertise in the field of AI.
4. Il-mandat tal-membri tal-forum konsultattiv għandu jkun ta' sentejn, li jista' jiġi estiż sa massimu ta' erba' snin.
4. The term of office of the members of the advisory forum shall be two years, which may be extended by up to no more than four years.
5. L-Aġenzija għad-Drittijiet Fundamentali, l-ENISA, il-Kumitat Ewropew għall-Istandardizzazzjoni (CEN), il-Kumitat Ewropew għall-Istandardizzazzjoni Elettroteknika (CENELEC), u l-Istitut Ewropew tal-Istandards tat-Telekomunikazzjoni (ETSI) għandhom ikunu membri permanenti tal-forum konsultattiv.
5. The Fundamental Rights Agency, ENISA, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC), and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) shall be permanent members of the advisory forum.
6. Il-forum konsultattiv għandu jfassal ir-regoli ta' proċedura tiegħu stess. Għandu jeleġġi żewġ kopresidenti minn fost il-membri tiegħu, f'konformità mal-kriterji stipulati fil-paragrafu 2. Il-mandat tal-kopresidenti għandu jkun ta' sentejn, li jista' jiġġedded darba.
6. The advisory forum shall draw up its rules of procedure. It shall elect two co-chairs from among its members, in accordance with criteria set out in paragraph 2. The term of office of the co-chairs shall be two years, renewable once.
7. Il-forum konsultattiv għandu jorganizza laqgħat mill-inqas darbtejn fis-sena. Il-forum konsultattiv jista' jistieden esperti u partijiet ikkonċernati oħra għal-laqgħat tiegħu.
7. The advisory forum shall hold meetings at least twice a year. The advisory forum may invite experts and other stakeholders to its meetings.
8. Il-forum konsultattiv jista' jħejji opinjonijiet, rakkomandazzjonijiet u kontributi bil-miktub fuq talba tal-Bord jew tal-Kummissjoni.
8. The advisory forum may prepare opinions, recommendations and written contributions at the request of the Board or the Commission.
9. Il-forum konsultattiv jista' jistabbilixxi sottogruppi permanenti jew temporanji kif ikun xieraq bl-għan li jiġu eżaminati kwistjonijiet speċifiċi relatati mal-objettivi ta' dan ir-Regolament.
9. The advisory forum may establish standing or temporary sub-groups as appropriate for the purpose of examining specific questions related to the objectives of this Regulation.
10. Il-forum konsultattiv għandu jħejji rapport annwali dwar l-attivitajiet tiegħu. Dak ir-rapport għandu jitqiegħed għad-dispożizzjoni tal-pubbliku.
10. The advisory forum shall prepare an annual report on its activities. That report shall be made publicly available.
Artikolu 68
Article 68
Bord ta' esperti indipendenti
Scientific panel of independent experts
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha, permezz ta' att ta' implimentazzjoni, tagħmel dispożizzjonijiet dwar l-istabbiliment ta' bord ta' esperti indipendenti (il-“bord”) maħsuba biex jappoġġaw l-attivitajiet ta' infurzar skont dan ir-Regolament. Dak l-att ta' implimentazzjoni għandu jiġi adottat f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
1. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, make provisions on the establishment of a scientific panel of independent experts (the ‘scientific panel’) intended to support the enforcement activities under this Regulation. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
2. Il-bord għandu jkun magħmul minn esperti magħżula mill-Kummissjoni abbażi ta' kompetenza esperta xjentifika jew teknika aġġornata fil-qasam tal-IA meħtieġ għall-kompiti stipulati fil-paragrafu 3, u għandu jkun kapaċi juri li jissodisfa l-kundizzjonijiet kollha li ġejjin:
2. The scientific panel shall consist of experts selected by the Commission on the basis of up-to-date scientific or technical expertise in the field of AI necessary for the tasks set out in paragraph 3, and shall be able to demonstrate meeting all of the following conditions:
(a)
ikollu għarfien espert u kompetenza partikolari u kompetenza esperta xjentifika jew teknika fil-qasam tal-IA;
(a)
having particular expertise and competence and scientific or technical expertise in the field of AI;
(b)
ikun indipendenti minn kwalunkwe fornitur ta' sistemi tal-IA jew mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali;
(b)
independence from any provider of AI systems or general-purpose AI models;
(c)
ikollu kapaċità li jwettaq l-attivitajiet b'mod diliġenti, preċiż u oġġettiv.
(c)
an ability to carry out activities diligently, accurately and objectively.
Il-Kummissjoni, f'konsultazzjoni mal-Bord, għandha tiddetermina l-għadd ta' esperti fil-bord f'konformità mal-bżonnijiet meħtieġa u għandha tiżgura rappreżentanza ġusta mil-lat ta' ġeneru u dak ġeografiku.
The Commission, in consultation with the Board, shall determine the number of experts on the panel in accordance with the required needs and shall ensure fair gender and geographical representation.
3. Il-bord għandu jagħti pariri u jappoġġa lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-kompiti li ġejjin:
3. The scientific panel shall advise and support the AI Office, in particular with regard to the following tasks:
(a)
jappoġġa l-implimentazzjoni u l-infurzar ta' dan ir-Regolament fir-rigward tal-mudelli u s-sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, b'mod partikolari billi:
(a)
supporting the implementation and enforcement of this Regulation as regards general-purpose AI models and systems, in particular by:
(i)
jallerta lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA dwar ir-riskji sistemiċi possibbli fil-livell tal-Unjoni ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 90;
(i)
alerting the AI Office of possible systemic risks at Union level of general-purpose AI models, in accordance with Article 90;
(ii)
jikkontribwixxi għall-iżvilupp ta' għodod u metodoloġiji biex jiġu evalwati l-kapaċitajiet tal-mudelli u s-sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, inkluż permezz ta' parametri referenzjarji;
(ii)
contributing to the development of tools and methodologies for evaluating capabilities of general-purpose AI models and systems, including through benchmarks;
(iii)
jagħti pariri dwar il-klassifikazzjoni tal-mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku;
(iii)
providing advice on the classification of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk;
(iv)
jagħti pariri dwar il-klassifikazzjoni ta' mudelli u sistemi diversi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali;
(iv)
providing advice on the classification of various general-purpose AI models and systems;
(v)
jikkontribwixxi għall-iżvilupp ta' għodod u mudelli;
(v)
contributing to the development of tools and templates;
(b)
jappoġġa l-ħidma tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, fuq talba tagħhom;
(b)
supporting the work of market surveillance authorities, at their request;
(c)
jappoġġa l-attivitajiet transfruntieri tas-sorveljanza tas-suq kif imsemmija fl-Artikolu 74(11), mingħajr preġudizzju għas-setgħat tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq;
(c)
supporting cross-border market surveillance activities as referred to in Article 74(11), without prejudice to the powers of market surveillance authorities;
(d)
jappoġġa lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA fit-twettiq ta' dmirijietu fil-kuntest tal-proċedura ta' salvagwardja tal-Unjoni skont l-Artikolu 81.
(d)
supporting the AI Office in carrying out its duties in the context of the Union safeguard procedure pursuant to Article 81.
4. L-esperti fuq il-bord għandhom iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom b'imparzjalità u oġġettività, u għandhom jiżguraw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni u tad-data miksuba fit-twettiq tal-kompiti u l-attivitajiet tagħhom. Huma la għandhom ifittxu u lanqas jieħdu struzzjonijiet mingħand xi ħadd meta jeżerċitaw il-kompiti tagħhom skont il-paragrafu 3. Kull espert għandu jfassal dikjarazzjoni tal-interessi, li għandha titqiegħed għad-dispożizzjoni tal-pubbliku. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jistabbilixxi sistemi u proċeduri biex jimmaniġġa u jipprevjeni b'mod attiv kunflitti ta' interess potenzjali.
4. The experts on the scientific panel shall perform their tasks with impartiality and objectivity, and shall ensure the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities. They shall neither seek nor take instructions from anyone when exercising their tasks under paragraph 3. Each expert shall draw up a declaration of interests, which shall be made publicly available. The AI Office shall establish systems and procedures to actively manage and prevent potential conflicts of interest.
5. L-att ta' implimentazzjoni msemmi fil-paragrafu 1 għandu jinkludi dispożizzjonijiet dwar il-kundizzjonijiet, il-proċeduri u l-arranġamenti ddettaljati biex il-bord u l-membri tiegħu joħorġu allerti u jitolbu l-assistenza tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA għat-twettiq tal-kompiti tal-bord.
5. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall include provisions on the conditions, procedures and detailed arrangements for the scientific panel and its members to issue alerts, and to request the assistance of the AI Office for the performance of the tasks of the scientific panel.
Artikolu 69
Article 69
Aċċess għall-grupp ta' esperti mill-Istati Membri
Access to the pool of experts by the Member States
1. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jitolbu lill-esperti tal-bord jappoġġaw l-attivitajiet ta' infurzar tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament.
1. Member States may call upon experts of the scientific panel to support their enforcement activities under this Regulation.
2. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jintalbu jħallsu tariffi għall-pariri u l-appoġġ ipprovduti mill-esperti. L-istruttura u l-livell tat-tariffi kif ukoll l-iskala u l-istruttura tal-ispejjeż li jistgħu jinġabru għandhom jiġu stipulati fl-att ta' implimentazzjoni msemmi fl-Artikolu 68(1), filwaqt li jitqiesu l-objettivi tal-implimentazzjoni adegwata ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-kosteffettività u l-ħtieġa li jiġi żgurat aċċess effettiv għall-esperti għall-Istati Membri kollha.
2. The Member States may be required to pay fees for the advice and support provided by the experts. The structure and the level of fees as well as the scale and structure of recoverable costs shall be set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 68(1), taking into account the objectives of the adequate implementation of this Regulation, cost-effectiveness and the necessity of ensuring effective access to experts for all Member States.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiffaċilita l-aċċess f'waqtu mill-Istati Membri għall-esperti, skont kif ikun meħtieġ, u tiżgura li t-taħlita ta' attivitajiet ta' appoġġ imwettqa mill-appoġġ tal-Unjoni għall-ittestjar tal-IA skont l-Artikolu 84 u l-esperti skont dan l-Artikolu tkun organizzata b'mod effiċjenti u tagħti l-aħjar valur miżjud possibbli.
3. The Commission shall facilitate timely access to the experts by the Member States, as needed, and ensure that the combination of support activities carried out by Union AI testing support pursuant to Article 84 and experts pursuant to this Article is efficiently organised and provides the best possible added value.
TAQSIMA 2
SECTION 2
Awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti
National competent authorities
Artikolu 70
Article 70
Id-deżinjazzjoni tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti u tal-punti uniċi ta’ kuntatt
Designation of national competent authorities and single points of contact
1. Kull Stat Membru għandu jistabbilixxi jew jiddeżinja bħala awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti mill-inqas awtorità tan-notifika waħda u mill-inqas awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq waħda għall-finijiet ta’ dan ir-Regolament. Dawk l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jeżerċitaw is-setgħat tagħhom b’mod indipendenti, imparzjali u mingħajr preġudizzju sabiex jissalvagwardaw l-oġġettività tal-attivitajiet u l-kompiti tagħhom, u biex jiżguraw l-applikazzjoni u l-implimentazzjoni ta’ dan ir-Regolament. Il-membri ta’ dawk l-awtoritajiet ma għandhom iwettqu l-ebda azzjoni li ma tkunx kompatibbli ma’ dmirijiethom. Dment li dawk il-prinċipji jiġu rispettati, dawn l-attivitajiet u l-kompiti jistgħu jitwettqu minn awtorità ddeżinjata waħda jew aktar, f’konformità mal-ħtiġijiet organizzattivi tal-Istat Membru.
1. Each Member State shall establish or designate as national competent authorities at least one notifying authority and at least one market surveillance authority for the purposes of this Regulation. Those national competent authorities shall exercise their powers independently, impartially and without bias so as to safeguard the objectivity of their activities and tasks, and to ensure the application and implementation of this Regulation. The members of those authorities shall refrain from any action incompatible with their duties. Provided that those principles are observed, such activities and tasks may be performed by one or more designated authorities, in accordance with the organisational needs of the Member State.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom jikkomunikaw lill-Kummissjoni l-identità tal-awtoritajiet tan-notifika u tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-kompiti ta’ dawk l-awtoritajiet kif ukoll kwalunkwe bidla sussegwenti fihom. L-Istati Membri għandhom iqiegħdu għad-dispożizzjoni tal-pubbliku informazzjoni dwar kif l-awtoritajiet kompetenti u l-punti uniċi ta’ kuntatt jistgħu jiġu kkuntattjati, b’mezzi ta’ komunikazzjoni elettronika sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiddeżinjaw awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq biex taġixxi bħala l-punt uniku ta’ kuntatt għal dan ir-Regolament, u għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni bl-identità tal-punt uniku ta’ kuntatt. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tagħmel disponibbli għall-pubbliku lista tal-punti uniċi ta’ kuntatt.
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the identity of the notifying authorities and the market surveillance authorities and the tasks of those authorities, as well as any subsequent changes thereto. Member States shall make publicly available information on how competent authorities and single points of contact can be contacted, through electronic communication means by 2 August 2025. Member States shall designate a market surveillance authority to act as the single point of contact for this Regulation, and shall notify the Commission of the identity of the single point of contact. The Commission shall make a list of the single points of contact publicly available.
3. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiżguraw li l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti tagħhom jiġu pprovduti b’riżorsi tekniċi, finanzjarji u umani adegwati, u b’infrastruttura biex iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom b’mod effettiv skont dan ir-Regolament. B’mod partikolari, l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandu jkollhom għadd suffiċjenti ta’ persunal disponibbli b’mod permanenti li l-kompetenzi u l-kompetenza esperta tiegħu għandhom jinkludu fehim fil-fond tat-teknoloġiji tal-IA, tad-data u tal-computing tad-data, tal-protezzjoni tad-data personali, taċ-ċibersigurtà, tad-drittijiet fundamentali, tar-riskji għas-saħħa u għas-sikurezza u għarfien tal-istandards u tar-rekwiżiti legali eżistenti. L-Istati Membri għandhom jivvalutaw u, jekk meħtieġ, jaġġornaw ir-rekwiżiti ta’ kompetenza u tar-riżorsi msemmija f’dan il-paragrafu fuq bażi annwali.
3. Member States shall ensure that their national competent authorities are provided with adequate technical, financial and human resources, and with infrastructure to fulfil their tasks effectively under this Regulation. In particular, the national competent authorities shall have a sufficient number of personnel permanently available whose competences and expertise shall include an in-depth understanding of AI technologies, data and data computing, personal data protection, cybersecurity, fundamental rights, health and safety risks and knowledge of existing standards and legal requirements. Member States shall assess and, if necessary, update competence and resource requirements referred to in this paragraph on an annual basis.
4. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jieħdu miżuri opportuni biex jiżguraw livell adegwat ta' ċibersigurtà.
4. National competent authorities shall take appropriate measures to ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity.
5. Fit-twettiq tal-kompiti tagħhom, l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jaġixxu f'konformità mal-obbligi tal-kunfidenzjalità stipulati fl-Artikolu 78.
5. When performing their tasks, the national competent authorities shall act in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
6. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025 u darba kull sentejn wara dan, l-Istati Membri għandhom jirrappurtaw lill-Kummissjoni dwar l-istatus tar-riżorsi finanzjarji u umani tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, b'valutazzjoni tal-adegwatezza tagħhom. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tibgħat dik l-informazzjoni lill-Bord għal diskussjoni u għal rakkomandazzjonijiet possibbli.
6. By 2 August 2025, and once every two years thereafter, Member States shall report to the Commission on the status of the financial and human resources of the national competent authorities, with an assessment of their adequacy. The Commission shall transmit that information to the Board for discussion and possible recommendations.
7. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiffaċilita l-iskambju tal-esperjenza bejn l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti.
7. The Commission shall facilitate the exchange of experience between national competent authorities.
8. L-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jistgħu jipprovdu gwida u pariri dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari lill-SMEs inkluż in-negozji ġodda, filwaqt li jqisu l-gwida u l-pariri tal-Bord u tal-Kummissjoni, kif ikun xieraq. Kull meta l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jkollhom l-intenzjoni li jipprovdu gwida u pariri fir-rigward ta' sistema tal-IA f'oqsma koperti minn liġi oħra tal-Unjoni, l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti skont dik il-liġi tal-Unjoni għandhom jiġu kkonsultati, meta jkun xieraq.
8. National competent authorities may provide guidance and advice on the implementation of this Regulation, in particular to SMEs including start-ups, taking into account the guidance and advice of the Board and the Commission, as appropriate. Whenever national competent authorities intend to provide guidance and advice with regard to an AI system in areas covered by other Union law, the national competent authorities under that Union law shall be consulted, as appropriate.
9. Meta l-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji jew l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data għandu jaġixxi bħala l-awtorità kompetenti għas-superviżjoni tagħhom.
9. Where Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies fall within the scope of this Regulation, the European Data Protection Supervisor shall act as the competent authority for their supervision.
KAPITOLU VIII
CHAPTER VIII
BAŻI TAD-DATA TAL-UE GĦAL SISTEMI TAL-IA B'RISKJU GĦOLI
EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Artikolu 71
Article 71
Bażi tad-data tal-UE għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati fl-Anness III
EU database for high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III
1. F'kollaborazzjoni mal-Istati Membri, il-Kummissjoni għandha tistabbilixxi u żżomm bażi tad-data tal-UE li jkun fiha l-informazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafi 2 u 3 ta' dan l-Artikolu dwar is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmijin fl-Artikolu 6(2) li huma rreġistrati f'konformità mal-Artikoli 49 u 60 u s-sistemi tal-IA li ma humiex ikkunsidrati bħala riskju għoli skont l-Artikolu 6(3) u li huma rreġistrati f’konformità mal-Artikolu 6(40 u l-Artikolu 49. Meta tistabbilixxi l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet funzjonali ta' tali bażi tad-data, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta lill-esperti rilevanti, u meta taġġorna l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet funzjonali ta' tali bażi tad-data, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta lill-Bord.
1. The Commission shall, in collaboration with the Member States, set up and maintain an EU database containing information referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article concerning high-risk AI systems referred to in Article 6(2) which are registered in accordance with Articles 49 and 60 and AI systems that are not considered as high-risk pursuant to Article 6(3) and which are registered in accordance with Article 6(4) and Article 49. When setting the functional specifications of such database, the Commission shall consult the relevant experts, and when updating the functional specifications of such database, the Commission shall consult the Board.
2. Id-data elenkata fit-Taqsimiet A u B tal-Anness VIII, għandha tiddaħħal fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE mill-fornitur, jew fejn applikabbli, mir-rappreżentant awtorizzat.
2. The data listed in Sections A and B of Annex VIII shall be entered into the EU database by the provider or, where applicable, by the authorised representative.
3. Id-data elenkata fit-Taqsima C tal-Anness VIII, għandha tiddaħħal fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE mill-implimentatur li huwa, jew li jaġixxi f'isem, awtorità, aġenzija jew korp pubbliċi, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(4) u (4).
3. The data listed in Section C of Annex VIII shall be entered into the EU database by the deployer who is, or who acts on behalf of, a public authority, agency or body, in accordance with Article 49(3) and (4).
4. Bl-eċċezzjoni tat-taqsima msemmija fl-Artikolu 49(4) u l-Artikolu 60(4), il-punt (c), l-informazzjoni li tinsab fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE rreġistrata f’konformità mal-Artikolu 49 għandha tkun aċċessibbli u disponibbli għall-pubbliku b’mod faċli għall-utent. L-informazzjoni għandha tkun faċilment navigabbli u tinqara mill-magni. L-informazzjoni rreġistrata f’konformità mal-Artikolu 60 għandha tkun aċċessibbli biss għall-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u għall-Kummissjoni, sakemm il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv ma jkunx ta l-kunsens tiegħu biex l-informazzjoni tkun aċċessibbli wkoll għall-pubbliku.
4. With the exception of the section referred to in Article 49(4) and Article 60(4), point (c), the information contained in the EU database registered in accordance with Article 49 shall be accessible and publicly available in a user-friendly manner. The information should be easily navigable and machine-readable. The information registered in accordance with Article 60 shall be accessible only to market surveillance authorities and the Commission, unless the prospective provider or provider has given consent for also making the information accessible the public.
5. Il-bażi tad-data tal-UE għandu jkun fiha data personali biss sa fejn tkun meħtieġa għall-ġbir u għall-ipproċessar ta’ informazzjoni f’konformità ma’ dan ir-Regolament. Dik l-informazzjoni għandha tinkludi l-ismijiet u d-dettalji ta’ kuntatt tal-persuni fiżiċi li huma responsabbli għar-reġistrazzjoni tas-sistema u li għandhom l-awtorità legali biex jirrappreżentaw lill-fornitur jew lill-implimentatur, kif applikabbli.
5. The EU database shall contain personal data only in so far as necessary for collecting and processing information in accordance with this Regulation. That information shall include the names and contact details of natural persons who are responsible for registering the system and have the legal authority to represent the provider or the deployer, as applicable.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tkun il-kontrollur tal-bażi tad-data tal-UE. Għandha tqiegħed għad-dispożizzjoni tal-fornituri, il-fornituri prospettivi u l-implimentaturi appoġġ tekniku u amministrattiv adegwat. Il-bażi tad-data tal-UE għandha tikkonforma mar-rekwiżiti ta’ aċċessibbiltà applikabbli.
6. The Commission shall be the controller of the EU database. It shall make available to providers, prospective providers and deployers adequate technical and administrative support. The EU database shall comply with the applicable accessibility requirements.
KAPITOLU IX
CHAPTER IX
SORVELJANZA TA’ WARA T-TQEGĦID FIS-SUQ, KONDIVIŻJONI TAL-INFORMAZZJONI U SORVELJANZA TAS-SUQ
POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE
TAQSIMA 1
SECTION 1
Sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq
Post-market monitoring
Artikolu 72
Article 72
Is-sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq mill-fornituri u l-pjan ta’ sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq għal sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli
Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems
1. Il-fornituri għandhom jistabbilixxu u jiddokumentaw sistema ta’ sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq b’mod li jkun proporzjonat għan-natura tat-teknoloġiji tal-IA u għar-riskji tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli.
1. Providers shall establish and document a post-market monitoring system in a manner that is proportionate to the nature of the AI technologies and the risks of the high-risk AI system.
2. Is-sistema ta’ sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq għandha tiġbor, tiddokumenta u tanalizza b’mod attiv u sistematiku d-data rilevanti li tista’ tiġi pprovduta mill-implimentaturi jew li tista’ tinġabar permezz ta’ sorsi oħra dwar il-prestazzjoni tas-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli matul il-ħajja tagħhom, u tippermetti lill-fornitur jevalwa l-konformità kontinwa tas-sistemi tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2. Fejn rilevanti, is-sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq għandha tinkludi analiżi tal-interazzjoni ma’ sistemi oħra tal-IA. Dan l-obbligu ma għandux ikopri data operazzjonali sensittiva ta’ implimentaturi li jkunu awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi.
2. The post-market monitoring system shall actively and systematically collect, document and analyse relevant data which may be provided by deployers or which may be collected through other sources on the performance of high-risk AI systems throughout their lifetime, and which allow the provider to evaluate the continuous compliance of AI systems with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2. Where relevant, post-market monitoring shall include an analysis of the interaction with other AI systems. This obligation shall not cover sensitive operational data of deployers which are law-enforcement authorities.
3. Is-sistema ta’ sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq għandha tkun ibbażata fuq pjan ta’ monitoraġġ ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq. Il-pjan ta’ sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq għandu jkun parti mid-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Anness IV. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta att ta’ implimentazzjoni li jistipula dispożizzjonijiet dettaljati li jistabbilixxu mudell għall-pjan ta’ sorveljanza ta’ wara t-tqegħid fis-suq u l-lista tal-elementi li għandhom jiġu inklużi fil-pjan sat-2 ta’ Frar 2026. Dak l-att ta’ implimentazzjoni għandu jiġi adottat f’konformità mal-proċedura ta’ eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
3. The post-market monitoring system shall be based on a post-market monitoring plan. The post-market monitoring plan shall be part of the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV. The Commission shall adopt an implementing act laying down detailed provisions establishing a template for the post-market monitoring plan and the list of elements to be included in the plan by 2 February 2026. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
4. Għal sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I, meta sistema u pjan ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq ikunu diġà stabbiliti skont dik il-leġiżlazzjoni, sabiex tiġi żgurata l-konsistenza, jiġu evitati d-duplikazzjonijiet u jitnaqqsu kemm jista' jkun il-piżijiet addizzjonali, il-fornituri għandu jkollhom għażla li jintegraw, kif xieraq, l-elementi meħtieġa deskritti fil-paragrafi 1, 2 u 3 bl-użu tal-mudell imsemmi fil-paragrafu 3 fis-sistemi u fil-pjanijiet li diġà jeżistu skont dik il-leġiżlazzjoni, dment li dak jikseb livell ekwivalenti ta' protezzjoni.
4. For high-risk AI systems covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, where a post-market monitoring system and plan are already established under that legislation, in order to ensure consistency, avoid duplications and minimise additional burdens, providers shall have a choice of integrating, as appropriate, the necessary elements described in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 using the template referred in paragraph 3 into systems and plans already existing under that legislation, provided that it achieves an equivalent level of protection.
L-ewwel subparagrafu ta' dan il-paragrafu għandu japplika wkoll għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 5 tal-Anness III introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz minn istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji li jkunu soġġetti għal rekwiżiti skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji rigward il-governanza, l-arranġamenti jew il-proċessi interni tagħhom.
The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall also apply to high-risk AI systems referred to in point 5 of Annex III placed on the market or put into service by financial institutions that are subject to requirements under Union financial services law regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes.
TAQSIMA 2
SECTION 2
Kondiviżjoni tal-informazzjoni dwar inċidenti serji
Sharing of information on serious incidents
Artikolu 73
Article 73
Rappurtar ta' inċidenti serji
Reporting of serious incidents
1. Il-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli introdotti fis-suq tal-Unjoni għandhom jirrappurtaw kwalunkwe inċident serju lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istati Membri fejn seħħ dak l-inċident.
1. Providers of high-risk AI systems placed on the Union market shall report any serious incident to the market surveillance authorities of the Member States where that incident occurred.
2. Ir-rapport imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1 għandu jsir immedjatament wara li l-fornitur ikun stabbilixxa rabta kawżali bejn is-sistema tal-IA u l-inċident serju jew il-probabbiltà raġonevoli ta' tali rabta, u, fi kwalunkwe każ, sa mhux aktar tard minn 15-il jum wara li l-fornitur jew, fejn applikabbli, l-implimentatur, isir jaf bl-inċident serju.
2. The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made immediately after the provider has established a causal link between the AI system and the serious incident or the reasonable likelihood of such a link, and, in any event, not later than 15 days after the provider or, where applicable, the deployer, becomes aware of the serious incident.
Il-perjodu għar-rappurtar imsemmi fl-ewwel subparagrafu għandu jqis is-severità tal-inċident serju.
The period for the reporting referred to in the first subparagraph shall take account of the severity of the serious incident.
3. Minkejja l-paragrafu 2 ta' dak l-Artikolu, fil-każ ta' ksur mifrux jew inċident serju kif definit fl-Artikolu 3, il-punt (49)(b), ir-rapport imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu għandu jiġi pprovdut immedjatament, u mhux aktar tard minn jumejn wara li l-fornitur jew, fejn applikabbli, l-implimentatur isir jaf b'dak l-inċident.
3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Article, in the event of a widespread infringement or a serious incident as defined in Article 3, point (49)(b), the report referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be provided immediately, and not later than two days after the provider or, where applicable, the deployer becomes aware of that incident.
4. Minkejja l-paragrafu 2, fil-każ ta' mewt ta' persuna, ir-rapport għandu jiġi pprovdut immedjatament wara li l-fornitur jew l-implimentatur ikun stabbilixxa, jew malli jissuspetta, relazzjoni kawżali bejn is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli u l-inċident serju, iżda mhux aktar tard minn għaxart ijiem wara d-data li fiha l-fornitur jew, meta applikabbli, l-implimentatur isir jaf bl-inċident serju.
4. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, in the event of the death of a person, the report shall be provided immediately after the provider or the deployer has established, or as soon as it suspects, a causal relationship between the high-risk AI system and the serious incident, but not later than 10 days after the date on which the provider or, where applicable, the deployer becomes aware of the serious incident.
5. Fejn meħtieġ biex jiġi żgurat rappurtar f'waqtu, il-fornitur jew, fejn applikabbli, l-implimentatur, jistgħu jissottomettu rapport inizjali li ma jkunx komplut segwit minn rapport komplut.
5. Where necessary to ensure timely reporting, the provider or, where applicable, the deployer, may submit an initial report that is incomplete, followed by a complete report.
6. Wara li jiġi rrappurtat inċident serju skont il-paragrafu 1, il-fornitur għandu jwettaq, mingħajr dewmien, l-investigazzjonijiet neċessarji b'rabta mal-inċident serju u s-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata. Dan għandu jinkludi valutazzjoni tar-riskju tal-inċident u azzjoni korrettiva.
6. Following the reporting of a serious incident pursuant to paragraph 1, the provider shall, without delay, perform the necessary investigations in relation to the serious incident and the AI system concerned. This shall include a risk assessment of the incident, and corrective action.
Il-fornitur għandu jikkoopera mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti u, fejn rilevanti, mal-korp notifikat ikkonċernat, waqt l-investigazzjonijiet imsemmijin fl-ewwel subparagrafu, u ma għandu jwettaq l-ebda investigazzjoni li tinvolvi alterazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata b'mod li jista' jaffettwa kull evalwazzjoni sussegwenti tal-kawżi tal-inċident, qabel ma jinforma lill-awtoritajiet kompetenti b'din l-azzjoni.
The provider shall cooperate with the competent authorities, and where relevant with the notified body concerned, during the investigations referred to in the first subparagraph, and shall not perform any investigation which involves altering the AI system concerned in a way which may affect any subsequent evaluation of the causes of the incident, prior to informing the competent authorities of such action.
7. Malli tirċievi notifika relatata ma' inċident serju msemmi fl-Artikolu 3, il-punt (44)(c), l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti għandha tinforma lill-awtoritajiet jew lill-korpi pubbliċi nazzjonali msemmija fl-Artikolu 77(1). Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżviluppa gwida ddedikata biex tiffaċilita l-konformità mal-obbligi stipulati fil-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu. Dik il-gwida għandha tinħareġ sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025, u għandha tiġi vvalutata b'mod regolari.
7. Upon receiving a notification related to a serious incident referred to in Article 3, point (49)(c), the relevant market surveillance authority shall inform the national public authorities or bodies referred to in Article 77(1). The Commission shall develop dedicated guidance to facilitate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article. That guidance shall be issued by 2 August 2025, and shall be assessed regularly.
8. L-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha tieħu miżuri xierqa, kif previst fl-Artikolu 19 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, fi żmien sebat ijiem mid-data li fiha tkun irċeviet in-notifika msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu u għandha ssegwi l-proċeduri ta' notifika kif previst f'dak ir-Regolament.
8. The market surveillance authority shall take appropriate measures, as provided for in Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, within seven days from the date it received the notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and shall follow the notification procedures as provided in that Regulation.
9. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III li jiġu introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz minn fornituri li jkunu soġġetti għal strumenti leġiżlattivi tal-Unjoni li jistabbilixxu obbligi ta' rappurtar ekwivalenti għal dawk stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament, in-notifika ta' inċidenti serji għandha tkun limitata għal dawk imsemmija fl-Artikolu 3, il-punt (49)(c).
9. For high-risk AI systems referred to in Annex III that are placed on the market or put into service by providers that are subject to Union legislative instruments laying down reporting obligations equivalent to those set out in this Regulation, the notification of serious incidents shall be limited to those referred to in Article 3, point (49)(c).
10. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li huma komponenti tas-sikurezza ta' apparati, jew li huma stess huma apparati, koperti mir-Regolamenti (UE) 2017/745 u (UE) 2017/746, in-notifika ta' inċidenti serji għandha tkun limitata għal dawk imsemmija fl-Artikolu 3, il-punt (49)(c) ta' dan ir-Regolament, u għandha ssir lill-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti magħżula għal dak l-għan mill-Istati Membri fejn seħħ l-inċident.
10. For high-risk AI systems which are safety components of devices, or are themselves devices, covered by Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746, the notification of serious incidents shall be limited to those referred to in Article 3, point (49)(c) of this Regulation, and shall be made to the national competent authority chosen for that purpose by the Member States where the incident occurred.
11. L-awtoritajiet kompetenti nazzjonali għandhom jinnotifikaw minnufih lill-Kummissjoni bi kwalunkwe inċident serju, irrispettivament minn jekk ikunux ħadu azzjoni jew le fir-rigward tiegħu, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 20 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020.
11. National competent authorities shall immediately notify the Commission of any serious incident, whether or not they have taken action on it, in accordance with Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
TAQSIMA 3
SECTION 3
Infurzar
Enforcement
Artikolu 74
Article 74
Sorveljanza tas-suq u kontroll tas-sistemi tal-IA fis-suq tal-Unjoni
Market surveillance and control of AI systems in the Union market
1. Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għandu japplika għas-sistemi tal-IA koperti minn dan ir-Regolament. Għall-finijiet tal-infurzar effettiv ta' dan ir-Regolament:
1. Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall apply to AI systems covered by this Regulation. For the purposes of the effective enforcement of this Regulation:
(a)
kwalunkwe referenza għal operatur ekonomiku skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għandha tinftiehem bħala li tinkludi lill-operaturi kollha identifikati fl-Artikolu 2(1) ta' dan ir-Regolament;
(a)
any reference to an economic operator under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall be understood as including all operators identified in Article 2(1) of this Regulation;
(b)
kwalunkwe referenza għal prodott skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għandha tinftiehem bħala li tinkludi s-sistemi kollha tal-IA li jaqgħu fi ħdan il-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament.
(b)
any reference to a product under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall be understood as including all AI systems falling within the scope of this Regulation.
2. Bħala parti mill-obbligi ta' rappurtar tagħhom skont l-Artikolu 34(4) tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jirrappurtaw kull sena lill-Kummissjoni u lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali tal-kompetizzjoni rilevanti kwalunkwe informazzjoni identifikata matul l-attivitajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq li tista' tkun ta' interess potenzjali għall-applikazzjoni tad-dritt tal-Unjoni dwar ir-regoli tal-kompetizzjoni. Huma għandhom jirrappurtaw ukoll kull sena lill-Kummissjoni dwar l-użu ta' prattiki pprojbiti li jkunu seħħew matul dik is-sena u dwar il-miżuri li jkunu ttieħdu.
2. As part of their reporting obligations under Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, the market surveillance authorities shall report annually to the Commission and relevant national competition authorities any information identified in the course of market surveillance activities that may be of potential interest for the application of Union law on competition rules. They shall also annually report to the Commission about the use of prohibited practices that occurred during that year and about the measures taken.
3. Għal sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli relatati ma' prodotti koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament għandha tkun l-awtorità responsabbli għall-attivitajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq iddeżinjata skont dawk l-atti legali.
3. For high-risk AI systems related to products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I, the market surveillance authority for the purposes of this Regulation shall be the authority responsible for market surveillance activities designated under those legal acts.
B'deroga mill-ewwel subparagrafu, u f'ċirkostanzi xierqa, l-Istati Membri jistgħu jiddeżinjaw awtorità rilevanti oħra biex taġixxi bħala awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, dment li jiżguraw il-koordinazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq settorjali rilevanti li jkunu responsabbli għall-infurzar tal-atti legali elenkati fl-Anness I.
By derogation from the first subparagraph, and in appropriate circumstances, Member States may designate another relevant authority to act as a market surveillance authority, provided they ensure coordination with the relevant sectoral market surveillance authorities responsible for the enforcement of the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I.
4. Il-proċeduri msemmija fl-Artikoli 79 sa 83 ta' dan ir-Regolament ma għandhomx japplikaw għal sistemi tal-IA relatati ma' prodotti koperti mil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima A tal-Anness I, meta tali atti legali diġà jipprevedu proċeduri li jiżguraw livell ekwivalenti ta' protezzjoni u li jkollhom l-istess objettiv. F'każijiet bħal dawn, għandhom japplikaw minflok il-proċeduri settorjali rilevanti.
4. The procedures referred to in Articles 79 to 83 of this Regulation shall not apply to AI systems related to products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in section A of Annex I, where such legal acts already provide for procedures ensuring an equivalent level of protection and having the same objective. In such cases, the relevant sectoral procedures shall apply instead.
5. Mingħajr preġudizzju għas-setgħat tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq skont l-Artikolu 14 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, bl-għan li jiġi żgurat l-infurzar effettiv ta' dan ir-Regolament, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jistgħu jeżerċitaw is-setgħat imsemmija fl-Artikolu 14(4), il-punti (d) u (j) ta' dak ir-Regolament, skont kif ikun xieraq.
5. Without prejudice to the powers of market surveillance authorities under Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, for the purpose of ensuring the effective enforcement of this Regulation, market surveillance authorities may exercise the powers referred to in Article 14(4), points (d) and (j), of that Regulation remotely, as appropriate.
6. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli introdotti fis-suq, imqiegħda fis-servizz jew użati minn istituzzjonijiet finanzjarji regolati mil-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar is-servizzi finanzjarji, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament għandha tkun l-awtorità nazzjonali rilevanti responsabbli għas-superviżjoni finanzjarja ta' dawk l-istituzzjonijiet skont dik il-leġiżlazzjoni sakemm l-introduzzjoni fis-suq, it-tqegħid fis-servizz jew l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA jkun b'rabta diretta mal-forniment ta' dawk is-servizzi finanzjarji.
6. For high-risk AI systems placed on the market, put into service, or used by financial institutions regulated by Union financial services law, the market surveillance authority for the purposes of this Regulation shall be the relevant national authority responsible for the financial supervision of those institutions under that legislation in so far as the placing on the market, putting into service, or the use of the AI system is in direct connection with the provision of those financial services.
7. B'deroga mill-paragrafu 6, f'ċirkostanzi xierqa u dment li tiġi żgurata l-koordinazzjoni, awtorità rilevanti oħra tista' tiġi identifikata mill-Istat Membru bħala awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament.
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 6, in appropriate circumstances, and provided that coordination is ensured, another relevant authority may be identified by the Member State as market surveillance authority for the purposes of this Regulation.
Awtoritajiet nazzjonali tas-sorveljanza tas-suq li jissorveljaw istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu regolati skont id-Direttiva 2013/36/UE, li jkunu qed jieħdu sehem fil-Mekkaniżmu Superviżorju Uniku stabbilit bir-Regolament (UE) Nru 1024/2013, għandhom jirrappurtaw, mingħajr dewmien, lill-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew kwalunkwe informazzjoni identifikata matul l-attivitajiet tagħhom ta' sorveljanza tas-suq li tista' tkun ta' interess potenzjali għall-kompiti superviżorji prudenzjali tal-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew speċifikati f'dak ir-Regolament.
National market surveillance authorities supervising regulated credit institutions regulated under Directive 2013/36/EU, which are participating in the Single Supervisory Mechanism established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, should report, without delay, to the European Central Bank any information identified in the course of their market surveillance activities that may be of potential interest for the prudential supervisory tasks of the European Central Bank specified in that Regulation.
8. Għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati fil-punt 1 tal-Anness III ta’ dan ir-Regolament, sa fejn is-sistemi jintużaw għall-finijiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, il-ġestjoni tal-fruntieri u l-ġustizzja u d-demokrazija, u għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati fil-punti 6, 7 u 8 tal-Anness III ta' dan ir-Regolament, l-Istati Membri għandhom jiddeżinjaw bħala awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għall-finijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament jew l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kompetenti tal-protezzjoni tad-data skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, jew id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, jew kwalunkwe awtorità oħra ddeżinjata skont l-istess kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti fl-Artikoli 41 sa 44 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680. L-attivitajiet ta' sorveljanza tas-suq ma għandhom bl-ebda mod jaffettwaw l-indipendenza tal-awtoritajiet ġudizzjarji, jew b'xi mod ieħor jinterferixxu fl-attivitajiet tagħhom meta jaġixxu fil-kapaċità ġudizzjarja tagħhom.
8. For high-risk AI systems listed in point 1 of Annex III to this Regulation, in so far as the systems are used for law enforcement purposes, border management and justice and democracy, and for high-risk AI systems listed in points 6, 7 and 8 of Annex III to this Regulation, Member States shall designate as market surveillance authorities for the purposes of this Regulation either the competent data protection supervisory authorities under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Directive (EU) 2016/680, or any other authority designated pursuant to the same conditions laid down in Articles 41 to 44 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. Market surveillance activities shall in no way affect the independence of judicial authorities, or otherwise interfere with their activities when acting in their judicial capacity.
9. Meta l-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji jew l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data għandu jaġixxi bħala l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tagħhom, ħlief fir-rigward tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea waqt li tkun qed taġixxi fil-kapaċità ġudizzjarja tagħha.
9. Where Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies fall within the scope of this Regulation, the European Data Protection Supervisor shall act as their market surveillance authority, except in relation to the Court of Justice of the European Union acting in its judicial capacity.
10. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiffaċilitaw il-koordinazzjoni bejn l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq iddeżinjati skont dan ir-Regolament u awtoritajiet jew korpi nazzjonali rilevanti oħra li jissorveljaw l-applikazzjoni tal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I, jew f'liġi oħra tal-Unjoni, li tista' tkun rilevanti għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III.
10. Member States shall facilitate coordination between market surveillance authorities designated under this Regulation and other relevant national authorities or bodies which supervise the application of Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I, or in other Union law, that might be relevant for the high-risk AI systems referred to in Annex III.
11. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-Kummissjoni għandhom ikunu jistgħu jipproponu attivitajiet konġunti, inkluż investigazzjonijiet konġunti, li għandhom jitwettqu jew mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jew inkella mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq b'mod konġunt mal-Kummissjoni, li jkollhom l-għan li jippromwovu l-konformità, jidentifikaw in-nonkonformità, iqajmu kuxjenza jew jipprovdu gwida b'rabta ma' dan ir-Regolament fir-rigward ta' kategoriji speċifiċi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jinstabu li jippreżentaw riskju serju f'żewġ Stati Membri jew aktar f'konformità mal-Artikolu 9 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jipprovdi appoġġ ta' koordinazzjoni għall-investigazzjonijiet konġunti.
11. Market surveillance authorities and the Commission shall be able to propose joint activities, including joint investigations, to be conducted by either market surveillance authorities or market surveillance authorities jointly with the Commission, that have the aim of promoting compliance, identifying non-compliance, raising awareness or providing guidance in relation to this Regulation with respect to specific categories of high-risk AI systems that are found to present a serious risk across two or more Member States in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The AI Office shall provide coordination support for joint investigations.
12. Mingħajr preġudizzju għas-setgħat previsti skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, u meta rilevanti u limitat għal dak li huwa meħtieġ biex iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jingħataw aċċess sħiħ mill-fornituri għad-dokumentazzjoni kif ukoll għas-settijiet tad-data għat-taħriġ, il-validazzjoni u l-ittestjar użati għall-iżvilupp tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, inkluż, meta xieraq u soġġett għal salvagwardji tas-sigurtà, permezz ta' interfaċċi għall-ipprogrammar tal-applikazzjonijiet (API) jew mezzi u għodod tekniċi rilevanti oħra li jippermettu aċċess remot.
12. Without prejudice to the powers provided for under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, and where relevant and limited to what is necessary to fulfil their tasks, the market surveillance authorities shall be granted full access by providers to the documentation as well as the training, validation and testing data sets used for the development of high-risk AI systems, including, where appropriate and subject to security safeguards, through application programming interfaces (API) or other relevant technical means and tools enabling remote access.
13. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jingħataw aċċess għall-kodiċi sors tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli fuq talba motivata u meta jiġu ssodisfati iż-żewġ kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin biss:
13. Market surveillance authorities shall be granted access to the source code of the high-risk AI system upon a reasoned request and only when both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
(a)
l-aċċess għall-kodiċi sors huwa meħtieġ biex tiġi vvalutata l-konformità ta' sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, Taqsima 2; u,
(a)
access to source code is necessary to assess the conformity of a high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2; and
(b)
il-proċeduri tal-ittestjar jew tal-awditjar u l-verifiki bbażati fuq id-data u d-dokumentazzjoni pprovduti mill-fornitur ġew eżawriti jew instab li mhumiex biżżejjed.
(b)
testing or auditing procedures and verifications based on the data and documentation provided by the provider have been exhausted or proved insufficient.
14. Kwalunkwe informazzjoni jew dokumentazzjoni miksubin mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jiġu ttrattati f'konformità mal-obbligi ta' kunfidenzjalità stipulati fl-Artikolu 78.
14. Any information or documentation obtained by market surveillance authorities shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
Artikolu 75
Article 75
Assistenza Reċiproka, sorveljanza tas-suq u kontroll ta' sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Mutual assistance, market surveillance and control of general-purpose AI systems
1. Meta sistema tal-IA tkun ibbażata fuq mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u l-mudell u s-sistema jiġu żviluppati mill-istess fornitur, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jkollu setgħat biex jimmonitorja u jissorvelja l-konformità ta' dik is-sistema tal-IA ma' obbligi skont dan ir-Regolament. Biex iwettaq il-kompiti ta' monitoraġġ u superviżjoni tiegħu, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jkollu s-setgħat kollha ta' awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq prevista f’din it-Taqsima u fir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020.
1. Where an AI system is based on a general-purpose AI model, and the model and the system are developed by the same provider, the AI Office shall have powers to monitor and supervise compliance of that AI system with obligations under this Regulation. To carry out its monitoring and supervision tasks, the AI Office shall have all the powers of a market surveillance authority provided for in this Section and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
2. Meta l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti jkollhom raġuni suffiċjenti biex iqisu li s-sistemi tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li jistgħu jintużaw direttament mill-implimentaturi għal mill-inqas skop wieħed li jkun ikklassifikat bħala b'riskju għoli skont dan ir-Regolament bħala mhux konformi mar-rekwiżiti stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament, huma għandhom jikkooperaw mal-Uffiċċju għall-IA biex iwettqu evalwazzjoni tal-konformità, u għandhom jinfurmaw lill-Bord u lill-awtoritajiet l-oħra tas-sorveljanza tas-suq kif xieraq.
2. Where the relevant market surveillance authorities have sufficient reason to consider general-purpose AI systems that can be used directly by deployers for at least one purpose that is classified as high-risk pursuant to this Regulation to be non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, they shall cooperate with the AI Office to carry out compliance evaluations, and shall inform the Board and other market surveillance authorities accordingly.
3. Meta awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ma tkunx tista' tikkonkludi l-investigazzjoni tagħha dwar is-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli minħabba li ma jkunx irnexxielha taċċessa ċerta informazzjoni relatata mal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali minkejja li tkun għamlet l-isforzi xierqa kollha biex tikseb dik l-informazzjoni, hija tista' tippreżenta talba motivata lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA, li biha l-aċċess għal dik l-informazzjoni għandu jiġi infurzat. F'dak il-każ, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jforni lill-awtorità applikanti mingħajr dewmien, u fi kwalunkwe każ fi żmien 30 jum, kwalunkwe informazzjoni li l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jqis li tkun rilevanti biex jistabbilixxi jekk sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli tkunx konformi. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jissalvagwardjaw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni li huma jiksbu f'konformità mal-Artikolu 78 ta' dan ir-Regolament. Il-proċedura prevista fil-Kapitolu VI tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għandha tapplika mutatis mutandis.
3. Where a market surveillance authority is unable to conclude its investigation of the high-risk AI system because of its inability to access certain information related to the general-purpose AI model despite having made all appropriate efforts to obtain that information, it may submit a reasoned request to the AI Office, by which access to that information shall be enforced. In that case, the AI Office shall supply to the applicant authority without delay, and in any event within 30 days, any information that the AI Office considers to be relevant in order to establish whether a high-risk AI system is non-compliant. Market surveillance authorities shall safeguard the confidentiality of the information that they obtain in accordance with Article 78 of this Regulation. The procedure provided for in Chapter VI of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Artikolu 76
Article 76
Superviżjoni tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq
Supervision of testing in real world conditions by market surveillance authorities
1. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandu jkollhom il-kompetenzi u s-setgħat biex jiżguraw li l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali jkun f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament.
1. Market surveillance authorities shall have competences and powers to ensure that testing in real world conditions is in accordance with this Regulation.
2. Meta l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali jsir għal sistemi tal-IA li jkunu taħt superviżjoni f'ambjent ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja tal-IA skont l-Artikolu 58, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jivverifikaw il-konformità mal-Artikolu 60 bħala parti mir-rwol superviżorju tagħhom għall-ambjenti ta' esperimentazzjoni regolatorja għall-IA. Dawk l-awtoritajiet jistgħu, kif xieraq, jippermettu li l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali jitwettaq mill-fornitur jew mill-fornitur prospettiv, b'deroga mill-kundizzjonijiet stipulati fl-Artikolu 60(4), il-punti (f) u (g).
2. Where testing in real world conditions is conducted for AI systems that are supervised within an AI regulatory sandbox under Article 58, the market surveillance authorities shall verify the compliance with Article 60 as part of their supervisory role for the AI regulatory sandbox. Those authorities may, as appropriate, allow the testing in real world conditions to be conducted by the provider or prospective provider, in derogation from the conditions set out in Article 60(4), points (f) and (g).
3. Fejn awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tkun ġiet infurmata mill-fornitur prospettiv, mill-fornitur jew minn kwalunkwe parti terza b'inċident serju jew ikollha raġunijiet oħra biex tqis li l-kundizzjonijiet stipulati fl-Artikoli 60 u 61 ma ġewx ssodisfati, din tista' tieħu kwalunkwe waħda mid-deċiżjonijiet li ġejjin fit-territorju tagħha, skont il-każ:
3. Where a market surveillance authority has been informed by the prospective provider, the provider or any third party of a serious incident or has other grounds for considering that the conditions set out in Articles 60 and 61 are not met, it may take either of the following decisions on its territory, as appropriate:
(a)
tissospendi jew twaqqaf l-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
(a)
to suspend or terminate the testing in real world conditions;
(b)
tirrikjedi li l-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv u l-implimentatur jew l-implimentatur prospettiv jimmodifikaw kwalunkwe aspett tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali.
(b)
to require the provider or prospective provider and the deployer or prospective deployer to modify any aspect of the testing in real world conditions.
4. Meta awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tkun ħadet deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 3 ta' dan l-Artikolu jew tkun ħarġet oġġezzjoni fis-sens tal-Artikolu 60(4), il-punt (b), id-deċiżjoni jew l-oġġezzjoni għandha tindika r-raġunijiet għaliha u kif il-fornitur jew il-fornitur prospettiv jista' jikkontesta d-deċiżjoni jew l-oġġezzjoni.
4. Where a market surveillance authority has taken a decision referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, or has issued an objection within the meaning of Article 60(4), point (b), the decision or the objection shall indicate the grounds therefor and how the provider or prospective provider can challenge the decision or objection.
5. Fejn applikabbli, meta awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tkun ħadet deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 3, hija għandha tikkomunika r-raġunijiet għal dan lill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istati Membri l-oħra li fihom is-sistema tal-IA tkun ġiet ittestjata f'konformità mal-pjan tal-ittestjar.
5. Where applicable, where a market surveillance authority has taken a decision referred to in paragraph 3, it shall communicate the grounds therefor to the market surveillance authorities of other Member States in which the AI system has been tested in accordance with the testing plan.
Artikolu 77
Article 77
Setgħat tal-awtoritajiet li jipproteġu d-drittijiet fundamentali
Powers of authorities protecting fundamental rights
1. L-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi pubbliċi nazzjonali li jissorveljaw jew jinfurzaw ir-rispett tal-obbligi skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni li jipproteġu d-drittijiet fundamentali, inkluż id-dritt għan-nondiskriminazzjoni, fir-rigward tal-użu ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Anness III għandu jkollhom is-setgħa li jitolbu u jaċċessaw kwalunkwe dokumentazzjoni maħluqa jew miżmuma skont dan ir-Regolament f'lingwaġġ u f'format aċċessibbli meta l-aċċess għal dik id-dokumentazzjoni jkun meħtieġ biex iwettqu b'mod effettiv il-mandati tagħhom fil-limiti tal-ġuriżdizzjoni tagħhom. L-awtorità jew il-korp pubbliku rilevanti għandu jinforma lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru kkonċernat dwar kwalunkwe talba bħal din.
1. National public authorities or bodies which supervise or enforce the respect of obligations under Union law protecting fundamental rights, including the right to non-discrimination, in relation to the use of high-risk AI systems referred to in Annex III shall have the power to request and access any documentation created or maintained under this Regulation in accessible language and format when access to that documentation is necessary for effectively fulfilling their mandates within the limits of their jurisdiction. The relevant public authority or body shall inform the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned of any such request.
2. Sat-2 ta’ Novembru 2024, kull Stat Membru għandu jidentifika l-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi pubbliċi msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 u jagħmel lista tagħhom disponibbli għall-pubbliku. L-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw il-lista lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra u għandhom iżommu l-lista aġġornata.
2. By 2 November 2024, each Member State shall identify the public authorities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 and make a list of them publicly available. Member States shall notify the list to the Commission and to the other Member States, and shall keep the list up to date.
3. Meta d-dokumentazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ma tkunx suffiċjenti biex jiġi aċċertat jekk ikunx seħħ ksur tal-obbligi skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni li jipproteġi d-drittijiet fundamentali, l-awtorità jew il-korp pubbliku msemmi fil-paragrafu 1 jistgħu jagħmlu talba motivata lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, biex torganizza l-ittestjar tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli b'mezzi tekniċi. L-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha torganizza l-ittestjar bl-involviment mill-qrib tal-awtorità jew tal-korp pubbliku rikjedenti fi żmien raġonevoli wara t-talba.
3. Where the documentation referred to in paragraph 1 is insufficient to ascertain whether an infringement of obligations under Union law protecting fundamental rights has occurred, the public authority or body referred to in paragraph 1 may make a reasoned request to the market surveillance authority, to organise testing of the high-risk AI system through technical means. The market surveillance authority shall organise the testing with the close involvement of the requesting public authority or body within a reasonable time following the request.
4. Kwalunkwe informazzjoni jew dokumentazzjoni miksuba mill-awtoritajiet jew mill-korpi pubbliċi nazzjonali msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu skont dan l-Artikolu għandhom jiġu ttrattati f'konformità mal-obbligi ta' kunfidenzjalità stipulati fl-Artikolu 78.
4. Any information or documentation obtained by the national public authorities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article pursuant to this Article shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
Artikolu 78
Article 78
Kunfidenzjalità
Confidentiality
1. Il-Kummissjoni, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-korpi notifikati u kwalunkwe persuna fiżika jew ġuridika oħra involuta fl-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament għandhom, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali, jirrispettaw il-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni u tad-data miksuba fit-twettiq tal-kompiti u l-attivitajiet tagħhom b'tali mod li jipproteġu, b'mod partikolari:
1. The Commission, market surveillance authorities and notified bodies and any other natural or legal person involved in the application of this Regulation shall, in accordance with Union or national law, respect the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities in such a manner as to protect, in particular:
(a)
id-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali, u l-informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali jew is-sigrieti kummerċjali ta' persuna fiżika jew ġuridika, inkluż il-kodiċi tas-sors, ħlief fil-każijiet imsemmija fl-Artikolu 5 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/943 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (57);
(a)
the intellectual property rights and confidential business information or trade secrets of a natural or legal person, including source code, except in the cases referred to in Article 5 of Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council (57);
(b)
l-implimentazzjoni effettiva ta' dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari għall-finijiet ta' spezzjonijiet, investigazzjonijiet jew awditi;
(b)
the effective implementation of this Regulation, in particular for the purposes of inspections, investigations or audits;
(c)
l-interessi tas-sigurtà pubblika u nazzjonali;
(c)
public and national security interests;
(d)
it-twettiq tal-proċedimenti kriminali jew amministrattivi;
(d)
the conduct of criminal or administrative proceedings;
(e)
informazzjoni klassifikata skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali.
(e)
information classified pursuant to Union or national law.
2. L-awtoritajiet involuti fl-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament skont il-paragrafu 1 għandhom jitolbu biss data li tkun strettament meħtieġa għall-valutazzjoni tar-riskju ppreżentat minn sistemi tal-IA u għall-eżerċizzju tas-setgħat tagħhom f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament u mar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020. Huma għandhom jistabbilixxu miżuri taċ-ċibersigurtà adegwati u effettivi biex jipproteġu s-sigurtà u l-kunfidenzjalità tal-informazzjoni u d-data miksuba u għandhom iħassru d-data li tinġabar malli ma tibqax aktar meħtieġa għall-iskop li għalih tkun inkisbet, f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali applikabbli.
2. The authorities involved in the application of this Regulation pursuant to paragraph 1 shall request only data that is strictly necessary for the assessment of the risk posed by AI systems and for the exercise of their powers in accordance with this Regulation and with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. They shall put in place adequate and effective cybersecurity measures to protect the security and confidentiality of the information and data obtained, and shall delete the data collected as soon as it is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was obtained, in accordance with applicable Union or national law.
3. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-paragrafi 1 u 2, l-informazzjoni skambjata fuq bażi kunfidenzjali bejn l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti jew bejn l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti u l-Kummissjoni ma għandhiex tiġi ddivulgata mingħajr il-konsultazzjoni minn qabel tal-awtorità nazzjonali kompetenti tal-oriġini u tal-implimentatur meta s-sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 1, 6 jew 7 tal-Anness III jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil u meta tali divulgazzjoni tkun tipperikola l-interessi tas-sigurtà pubblika u nazzjonali. Dan l-iskambju ta’ informazzjoni ma għandux ikopri data operazzjonali sensittiva fir-rigward tal-attivitajiet tal-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-kontroll fil-fruntieri, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil.
3. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 and 2, information exchanged on a confidential basis between the national competent authorities or between national competent authorities and the Commission shall not be disclosed without prior consultation of the originating national competent authority and the deployer when high-risk AI systems referred to in point 1, 6 or 7 of Annex III are used by law enforcement, border control, immigration or asylum authorities and when such disclosure would jeopardise public and national security interests. This exchange of information shall not cover sensitive operational data in relation to the activities of law enforcement, border control, immigration or asylum authorities.
Meta l-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi, tal-immigrazzjoni jew tal-ażil ikunu fornituri ta’ sistemi tal-IA b’riskju għoli msemmija fil-punt 1, 6 jew 7 tal-Anness III, id-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Anness IV għandha tibqa’ fil-bini ta’ dawk l-awtoritajiet. Dawk l-awtoritajiet għandhom jiżguraw li l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq imsemmija fl-Artikolu 74(8) u (9), kif applikabbli, ikunu jistgħu, fuq talba, jaċċessaw minnufih id-dokumentazzjoni jew jiksbu kopja tagħha. Huwa biss il-persunal tal-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq bil-livell xieraq ta’ awtorizzazzjoni tas-sigurtà li għandu jitħalla jaċċessa dik id-dokumentazzjoni jew kwalunkwe kopja tagħha.
When the law enforcement, immigration or asylum authorities are providers of high-risk AI systems referred to in point 1, 6 or 7 of Annex III, the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV shall remain within the premises of those authorities. Those authorities shall ensure that the market surveillance authorities referred to in Article 74(8) and (9), as applicable, can, upon request, immediately access the documentation or obtain a copy thereof. Only staff of the market surveillance authority holding the appropriate level of security clearance shall be allowed to access that documentation or any copy thereof.
4. Il-paragrafi 1, 2 u 3 ma għandhomx jaffettwaw id-drittijiet u l-obbligi tal-Kummissjoni, tal-Istati Membri u tal-awtoritajiet rilevanti tagħhom, kif ukoll dawk tal-korpi notifikati, fir-rigward tal-iskambju tal-informazzjoni u d-disseminazzjoni ta’ twissijiet, inkluż fil-kuntest tal-kooperazzjoni transfruntiera, u lanqas ma għandhom jaffettwaw l-obbligi tal-partijiet ikkonċernati li jipprovdu informazzjoni skont il-liġi kriminali tal-Istati Membri.
4. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not affect the rights or obligations of the Commission, Member States and their relevant authorities, as well as those of notified bodies, with regard to the exchange of information and the dissemination of warnings, including in the context of cross-border cooperation, nor shall they affect the obligations of the parties concerned to provide information under criminal law of the Member States.
5. Il-Kummissjoni u l-Istati Membri jistgħu jiskambjaw, meta jkun meħtieġ u f’konformità mad-dispożizzjonijiet rilevanti tal-ftehimiet internazzjonali u kummerċjali, informazzjoni kunfidenzjali mal-awtoritajiet regolatorji ta’ pajjiżi terzi li magħhom ikunu kkonkludew arranġamenti bilaterali jew multilaterali dwar il-kunfidenzjalità li jiggarantixxu livell adegwat ta’ kunfidenzjalità.
5. The Commission and Member States may exchange, where necessary and in accordance with relevant provisions of international and trade agreements, confidential information with regulatory authorities of third countries with which they have concluded bilateral or multilateral confidentiality arrangements guaranteeing an adequate level of confidentiality.
Artikolu 79
Article 79
Proċedura fil-livell nazzjonali dwar kif għandhom jiġu ttrattati sistemi tal-IA li jippreżentaw riskju
Procedure at national level for dealing with AI systems presenting a risk
1. Is-sistemi tal-IA li jippreżentaw riskju għandhom jinftiehmu bħala “prodott li jippreżenta riskju” kif definit fl-Artikolu 3, il-punt 19 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, sa fejn jippreżentaw riskji għas-saħħa jew is-sikurezza jew għad-drittijiet fundamentali tal-persuni.
1. AI systems presenting a risk shall be understood as a ‘product presenting a risk’ as defined in Article 3, point 19 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, in so far as they present risks to the health or safety, or to fundamental rights, of persons.
2. Meta l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru jkollha raġuni suffiċjenti biex tqis li sistema tal-IA tippreżenta riskju kif imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, hija għandha twettaq evalwazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata fir-rigward tal-konformità tagħha mar-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi kollha stabbiliti f’dan ir-Regolament. Għandha tingħata attenzjoni partikolari lis-sistemi tal-IA li jippreżentaw riskju għal gruppi vulnerabbli. Meta jiġu identifikati riskji għad-drittijiet fundamentali ta’ persuni, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha wkoll tinforma lill-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi pubbliċi nazzjonali rilevanti msemmija fl-Artikolu 77(1) u tikkoopera bis-sħiħ magħhom. L-operaturi rilevanti għandhom jikkooperaw kif meħtieġ mal-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u mal-awtoritajiet jew il-korpi pubbliċi nazzjonali l-oħra msemmija fl-Artikolu 77(1).
2. Where the market surveillance authority of a Member State has sufficient reason to consider an AI system to present a risk as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, it shall carry out an evaluation of the AI system concerned in respect of its compliance with all the requirements and obligations laid down in this Regulation. Particular attention shall be given to AI systems presenting a risk to vulnerable groups. Where risks to fundamental rights are identified, the market surveillance authority shall also inform and fully cooperate with the relevant national public authorities or bodies referred to in Article 77(1). The relevant operators shall cooperate as necessary with the market surveillance authority and with the other national public authorities or bodies referred to in Article 77(1).
Meta, waqt li tkun qed issir dik l-evalwazzjoni, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jew, fejn applikabbli l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq f’kooperazzjoni mal-awtorità pubblika nazzjonali msemmija fl-Artikolu 77(1), issib li s-sistema tal-IA ma tkunx konformi mar-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi stabbiliti f’dan ir-Regolament, hija għandha tirrikjedi mingħajr dewmien żejjed li l-operatur rilevanti jieħu l-azzjonijiet korrettivi xierqa kollha biex iġib is-sistema tal-IA konformi, biex jirtira s-sistema tal-IA mis-suq, jew biex isejjaħha lura fi żmien li tista’ tistabbilixxi l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq u f’kull każ mhux aktar tard minn 15-il ġurnata tax-xogħol, jew kif previst fil-liġi rilevanti tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni.
Where, in the course of that evaluation, the market surveillance authority or, where applicable the market surveillance authority in cooperation with the national public authority referred to in Article 77(1), finds that the AI system does not comply with the requirements and obligations laid down in this Regulation, it shall without undue delay require the relevant operator to take all appropriate corrective actions to bring the AI system into compliance, to withdraw the AI system from the market, or to recall it within a period the market surveillance authority may prescribe, and in any event within the shorter of 15 working days, or as provided for in the relevant Union harmonisation legislation.
L-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha tinforma lill-korp notifikat rilevanti kif meħtieġ. L-Artikolu 18 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għandu japplika għall-miżuri msemmija fit-tieni subparagrafu ta’ dan il-paragrafu.
The market surveillance authority shall inform the relevant notified body accordingly. Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall apply to the measures referred to in the second subparagraph of this paragraph.
3. Meta l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tqis li n-nonkonformità ma tkunx ristretta biss għat-territorju nazzjonali tagħha, din għandha tinforma lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra mingħajr dewmien żejjed bir-riżultati tal-evalwazzjoni u dwar l-azzjonijiet li hija tkun eżiġiet li jittieħdu mill-operatur.
3. Where the market surveillance authority considers that the non-compliance is not restricted to its national territory, it shall inform the Commission and the other Member States without undue delay of the results of the evaluation and of the actions which it has required the operator to take.
4. L-operatur għandu jiżgura li tittieħed kull azzjoni korrettiva xierqa fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA kkonċernati li huwa jkun qiegħed fis-suq tal-Unjoni.
4. The operator shall ensure that all appropriate corrective action is taken in respect of all the AI systems concerned that it has made available on the Union market.
5. Meta l-operatur ta’ sistema tal-IA ma jiħux azzjoni korrettiva adegwata fiż-żmien imsemmi fil-paragrafu 2, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha tieħu l-miżuri proviżorji xierqa kollha biex tipprojbixxi jew tirrestrinġi li s-sistema tal-IA ssir disponibbli fis-suq nazzjonali tagħha jew titqiegħed fis-servizz, biex tirtira l-prodott jew is-sistema tal-IA awtonoma mis-suq jew biex issejjaħha lura. L-awtorità għandha tinnotifika mingħajr dewmien żejjed lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra dwar dawk il-miżuri.
5. Where the operator of an AI system does not take adequate corrective action within the period referred to in paragraph 2, the market surveillance authority shall take all appropriate provisional measures to prohibit or restrict the AI system’s being made available on its national market or put into service, to withdraw the product or the standalone AI system from that market or to recall it. That authority shall without undue delay notify the Commission and the other Member States of those measures.
6. In-notifika msemmija fil-paragrafu 5 għandha tinkludi d-dettalji disponibbli kollha, b’mod partikolari l-informazzjoni meħtieġa għall-identifikazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA mhux konformi, l-oriġini tas-sistema tal-IA u l-katina tal-provvista, in-natura tan-nonkonformità allegata u tar-riskju involut, in-natura u d-durata tal-miżuri nazzjonali meħuda u l-argumenti mressqa mill-operatur rilevanti. B’mod partikolari, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jindikaw jekk in-nonkonformità tkunx dovuta għal xi waħda mir-raġunijiet li ġejjin:
6. The notification referred to in paragraph 5 shall include all available details, in particular the information necessary for the identification of the non-compliant AI system, the origin of the AI system and the supply chain, the nature of the non-compliance alleged and the risk involved, the nature and duration of the national measures taken and the arguments put forward by the relevant operator. In particular, the market surveillance authorities shall indicate whether the non-compliance is due to one or more of the following:
(a)
nonkonformità mal-projbizzjoni tal-prattiki tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 5;
(a)
non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5;
(b)
nuqqas tas-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli li tissodisfa r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2;
(b)
a failure of a high-risk AI system to meet requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2;
(c)
nuqqasijiet fl-istandards armonizzati jew fl-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fl-Artikoli 40 u 41 li jagħtu preżunzjoni ta’ konformità;
(c)
shortcomings in the harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41 conferring a presumption of conformity;
(d)
nonkonformità mal-Artikolu 50.
(d)
non-compliance with Article 50.
7. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq li ma jkunux l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru li tniedi l-proċedura għandhom jinformaw lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra mingħajr dewmien żejjed dwar kull miżura adottata u dwar kull informazzjoni addizzjonali għad-dispożizzjoni tagħhom relatata man-nonkonformità tas-sistema tal-IA ikkonċernata, u, f’każ ta’ nuqqas ta’ qbil mal-miżura nazzjonali notifikata, dwar l-oġġezzjonijiet tagħhom.
7. The market surveillance authorities other than the market surveillance authority of the Member State initiating the procedure shall, without undue delay, inform the Commission and the other Member States of any measures adopted and of any additional information at their disposal relating to the non-compliance of the AI system concerned, and, in the event of disagreement with the notified national measure, of their objections.
8. Jekk, fi żmien tliet xhur minn meta tasal in-notifika msemmija fil-paragrafu 5 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, ma tkun saret l-ebda oġġezzjoni jew minn awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru jew mill-Kummissjoni fir-rigward ta’ miżura proviżorja meħuda minn awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru ieħor, dik il-miżura għandha titqies iġġustifikata. Dan għandu jkun mingħajr preġudizzju għad-drittijiet proċedurali tal-operatur ikkonċernat f’konformità mal-Artikolu 18 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020. Il-perjodu ta’ tliet xhur imsemmi f’dan il-paragrafu għandu jitnaqqas għal 30 jum fl-eventwalità ta’ nonkonformità mal-projbizzjoni tal-prattiki tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 5 ta’ dan ir-Regolament.
8. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article, no objection has been raised by either a market surveillance authority of a Member State or by the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a market surveillance authority of another Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified. This shall be without prejudice to the procedural rights of the concerned operator in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The three-month period referred to in this paragraph shall be reduced to 30 days in the event of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5 of this Regulation.
9. L-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandhom jiżguraw li jittieħdu l-miżuri restrittivi xierqa fir-rigward tal-prodott jew tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernati, bħalma huwa l-irtirar tal-prodott jew tas-sistema tal-IA mis-suq tagħhom, mingħajr dewmien żejjed.
9. The market surveillance authorities shall ensure that appropriate restrictive measures are taken in respect of the product or the AI system concerned, such as withdrawal of the product or the AI system from their market, without undue delay.
Artikolu 80
Article 80
Proċedura għat-trattament ta’ sistemi tal-IA kklassifikati mill-fornitur bħala mhux ta’ riskju għoli fl-applikazzjoni tal-Anness III
Procedure for dealing with AI systems classified by the provider as non-high-risk in application of Annex III
1. Meta awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ikollha raġuni suffiċjenti biex tqis li sistema tal-IA kklassifikata mill-fornitur bħala mhux ta’ riskju għoli skont l-Artikolu 6(3) tkun ta’ bilħaqq ta’ riskju għoli, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq għandha twettaq evalwazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata fir-rigward tal-klassifikazzjoni tagħha bħala sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli abbażi tal-kundizzjonijiet stipulati fl-Artikolu 6(3) u fil-linji gwida tal-Kummissjoni.
1. Where a market surveillance authority has sufficient reason to consider that an AI system classified by the provider as non-high-risk pursuant to Article 6(3) is indeed high-risk, the market surveillance authority shall carry out an evaluation of the AI system concerned in respect of its classification as a high-risk AI system based on the conditions set out in Article 6(3) and the Commission guidelines.
2. Meta, waqt li tkun qed issir dik l-evalwazzjoni, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq issib li s-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata tkun ta’ riskju għoli, hija għandha titlob mingħajr dewmien żejjed lill-fornitur rilevanti jieħu l-azzjonijiet kollha meħtieġa biex iġib is-sistema tal-IA konformi mar-rekwiżiti u mal-obbligi stabbiliti f’dan ir-Regolament kif ukoll jieħu azzjoni korrettiva xierqa fi żmien li tista’ tistabbilixxi l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq.
2. Where, in the course of that evaluation, the market surveillance authority finds that the AI system concerned is high-risk, it shall without undue delay require the relevant provider to take all necessary actions to bring the AI system into compliance with the requirements and obligations laid down in this Regulation, as well as take appropriate corrective action within a period the market surveillance authority may prescribe.
3. Meta l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tqis li l-użu tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata ma jkunx ristrett biss għat-territorju nazzjonali tagħha, hija għandha tinforma lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra mingħajr dewmien żejjed bir-riżultati tal-evalwazzjoni u bl-azzjonijiet li hija tkun talbet li jittieħdu mill-operatur.
3. Where the market surveillance authority considers that the use of the AI system concerned is not restricted to its national territory, it shall inform the Commission and the other Member States without undue delay of the results of the evaluation and of the actions which it has required the provider to take.
4. Il-fornitur għandu jiżgura li tittieħed l-azzjoni kollha meħtieġa biex is-sistema tal-IA ssir konformi mar-rekwiżiti u mal-obbligi stabbiliti f’dan ir-Regolament. Meta l-fornitur ta’ sistema tal-IA kkonċernata ma jġibx is-sistema tal-IA f’konformità ma’ dawk ir-rekwiżiti u mal-obbligi fiż-żmien imsemmi fil-paragrafu 2 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, il-fornitur għandu jkun soġġett għal multi f’konformità mal-Artikolu 99.
4. The provider shall ensure that all necessary action is taken to bring the AI system into compliance with the requirements and obligations laid down in this Regulation. Where the provider of an AI system concerned does not bring the AI system into compliance with those requirements and obligations within the period referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, the provider shall be subject to fines in accordance with Article 99.
5. Il-fornitur għandu jiżgura li tittieħed kull azzjoni korrettiva xierqa fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA kkonċernati li huwa jkun qiegħed fis-suq tal-Unjoni.
5. The provider shall ensure that all appropriate corrective action is taken in respect of all the AI systems concerned that it has made available on the Union market.
6. Meta l-fornitur tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernat ma jiħux azzjoni korrettiva adegwata fiż-żmien imsemmi fil-paragrafu 2 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, għandu japplika l-Artikolu 79(5) sa (9).
6. Where the provider of the AI system concerned does not take adequate corrective action within the period referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, Article 79(5) to (9) shall apply.
7. Meta, waqt li tkun qed issir l-evalwazzjoni skont il-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tistabbilixxi li s-sistema tal-IA tkun ġiet ikklassifikata ħażin mill-fornitur bħala mhux ta’ riskju għoli sabiex tiġi evitata l-applikazzjoni tar-rekwiżiti fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, il-fornitur għandu jkun soġġett għal multi f’konformità mal-Artikolu 99.
7. Where, in the course of the evaluation pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article, the market surveillance authority establishes that the AI system was misclassified by the provider as non-high-risk in order to circumvent the application of requirements in Chapter III, Section 2, the provider shall be subject to fines in accordance with Article 99.
8. Meta jeżerċitaw is-setgħa tagħhom li jimmonitorjaw l-applikazzjoni ta’ dan l-Artikolu, u f’konformità mal-Artikolu 11 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jistgħu jwettqu kontrolli xierqa, filwaqt li jqisu b’mod partikolari l-informazzjoni maħżuna fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71 ta’ dan ir-Regolament.
8. In exercising their power to monitor the application of this Article, and in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, market surveillance authorities may perform appropriate checks, taking into account in particular information stored in the EU database referred to in Article 71 of this Regulation.
Artikolu 81
Article 81
Proċedura ta’ salvagwardja tal-Unjoni
Union safeguard procedure
1. Meta, fi żmien tliet xhur minn meta tasal in-notifika msemmija fl-Artikolu 79(5), jew fi żmien 30 jum fil-każ ta’ nonkonformità mal-projbizzjoni tal-prattiki tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 5, jitqajmu oġġezzjonijiet mill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru għal miżura meħuda minn awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq oħra, jew meta l-Kummissjoni tqis li l-miżura tmur kontra d-dritt tal-Unjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta mingħajr dewmien żejjed mal-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru rilevanti u mal-operatur jew l-operaturi u għandha tevalwa l-miżura nazzjonali. Abbażi tar-riżultati ta’ dik l-evalwazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha fi żmien sitt xhur, jew fi żmien 60 jum fil-każ ta’ nonkonformità mal-projbizzjoni tal-prattiki tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 5, li jibdew min-notifika msemmija fl-Artikolu 79(5) u tiddeċiedi jekk il-miżura nazzjonali hijiex ġustifikata u għandha tinnotifika lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru kkonċernat bid-deċiżjoni tagħha. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tinforma wkoll lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq l-oħra kollha bid-deċiżjoni tagħha.
1. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 79(5), or within 30 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, objections are raised by the market surveillance authority of a Member State to a measure taken by another market surveillance authority, or where the Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union law, the Commission shall without undue delay enter into consultation with the market surveillance authority of the relevant Member State and the operator or operators, and shall evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall, within six months, or within 60 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, starting from the notification referred to in Article 79(5), decide whether the national measure is justified and shall notify its decision to the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned. The Commission shall also inform all other market surveillance authorities of its decision.
2. Meta l-Kummissjoni tqis li l-miżura meħuda mill-Istat Membru rilevanti tkun ġustifikata, l-Istati Membri kollha għandhom jiżguraw li jieħdu miżuri restrittivi xierqa fir-rigward tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata, bħar-rekwiżit tal-irtirar tas-sistema tal-IA mis-suq tagħhom mingħajr dewmien żejjed, u għandhom jinfurmaw lill-Kummissjoni b’dan. Meta l-Kummissjoni tqis li l-miżura nazzjonali mhijiex ġustifikata, l-Istat Membru kkonċernat għandu jirtira l-miżura u għandu jinforma lill-Kummissjoni b’dan.
2. Where the Commission considers the measure taken by the relevant Member State to be justified, all Member States shall ensure that they take appropriate restrictive measures in respect of the AI system concerned, such as requiring the withdrawal of the AI system from their market without undue delay, and shall inform the Commission accordingly. Where the Commission considers the national measure to be unjustified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure and shall inform the Commission accordingly.
3. Meta l-miżura nazzjonali titqies ġustifikata u n-nonkonformità tas-sistema tal-IA tkun attribwita għal nuqqasijiet fl-istandards armonizzati jew fl-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni msemmija fl-Artikoli 40 u 41 ta’ dan ir-Regolament, il-Kummissjoni għandha tapplika l-proċedura prevista fl-Artikolu 11 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012.
3. Where the national measure is considered justified and the non-compliance of the AI system is attributed to shortcomings in the harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41 of this Regulation, the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.
Artikolu 82
Article 82
Sistemi tal-IA konformi li jippreżentaw riskju
Compliant AI systems which present a risk
1. Meta, wara li twettaq evalwazzjoni skont l-Artikolu 79 u wara li tikkonsulta lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq imsemmija fl-Artikolu 77(1), l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru ssib li għalkemm sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli tkun konformi ma’ dan ir-Regolament, din tippreżenta xorta waħda riskju għas-saħħa jew għas-sikurezza tal-persuni, għad-drittijiet fundamentali, jew għal aspetti oħra tal-protezzjoni tal-interess pubbliku, hija għandha tirrikjedi li l-operatur rilevanti jieħu l-miżuri xierqa kollha biex jiżgura li s-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata, meta tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew titqiegħed fis-servizz, ma tibqax tippreżenta dak ir-riskju mingħajr dewmien żejjed, fi żmien li tista’ tistabbilixxi.
1. Where, having performed an evaluation under Article 79, after consulting the relevant national public authority referred to in Article 77(1), the market surveillance authority of a Member State finds that although a high-risk AI system complies with this Regulation, it nevertheless presents a risk to the health or safety of persons, to fundamental rights, or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall require the relevant operator to take all appropriate measures to ensure that the AI system concerned, when placed on the market or put into service, no longer presents that risk without undue delay, within a period it may prescribe.
2. Il-fornitur jew operatur rilevanti ieħor għandhom jiżguraw li tittieħed azzjoni korrettiva fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA kkonċernati kollha li jkunu qiegħdu fis-suq tal-Unjoni fl-iskeda ta’ żmien stipulata mill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru msemmija fil-paragrafu 1.
2. The provider or other relevant operator shall ensure that corrective action is taken in respect of all the AI systems concerned that it has made available on the Union market within the timeline prescribed by the market surveillance authority of the Member State referred to in paragraph 1.
3. L-Istati Membri għandhom jinfurmaw minnufih lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra b’sejba skont il-paragrafu 1. Dik l-informazzjoni għandha tinkludi d-dettalji kollha disponibbli, b’mod partikolari d-data neċessarja għall-identifikazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata, l-oriġini u l-katina tal-provvista tas-sistema tal-IA, tan-natura tar-riskju involut u tan-natura u tad-durata tal-miżuri nazzjonali meħuda.
3. The Member States shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States of a finding under paragraph 1. That information shall include all available details, in particular the data necessary for the identification of the AI system concerned, the origin and the supply chain of the AI system, the nature of the risk involved and the nature and duration of the national measures taken.
4. Il-Kummissjoni għandha, mingħajr dewmien żejjed, tikkonsulta mal-Istati Membri kkonċernati u mal-operaturi rilevanti u għandha tevalwa l-miżuri nazzjonali meħuda. Abbażi tar-riżultati ta’ dik l-evalwazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni għandha tiddeċiedi jekk il-miżura tkunx iġġustifikata, u meta jkun meħtieġ, tipproponi miżuri xierqa oħra.
4. The Commission shall without undue delay enter into consultation with the Member States concerned and the relevant operators, and shall evaluate the national measures taken. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide whether the measure is justified and, where necessary, propose other appropriate measures.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkomunika minnufih id-deċiżjoni tagħha lill-Istati Membri kkonċernati u lill-operaturi rilevanti. Hija għandha tinforma wkoll lill-Istati Membri l-oħra.
5. The Commission shall immediately communicate its decision to the Member States concerned and to the relevant operators. It shall also inform the other Member States.
Artikolu 83
Article 83
Nonkonformità formali
Formal non-compliance
1. Meta l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq ta’ Stat Membru tiskopri waħda minn dawn li ġejjin għandha tirrikjedi li l-fornitur rilevanti jtemm in-nonkonformità kkonċernata, fi żmien perjodu li tista’ tippreskrivi:
1. Where the market surveillance authority of a Member State makes one of the following findings, it shall require the relevant provider to put an end to the non-compliance concerned, within a period it may prescribe:
(a)
il-markatura CE li tkun twaħħlet bi ksur tal-Artikolu 48;
(a)
the CE marking has been affixed in violation of Article 48;
(b)
il-markatura CE li ma tkunx twaħħlet;
(b)
the CE marking has not been affixed;
(c)
id-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 ma tkunx saret;
(c)
the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 has not been drawn up;
(d)
id-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 ma tkunx saret kif suppost;
(d)
the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 has not been drawn up correctly;
(e)
ir-reġistrazzjoni fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 71 ma tkunx saret;
(e)
the registration in the EU database referred to in Article 71 has not been carried out;
(f)
meta applikabbli, ma jkunx inħatar ebdarappreżentant awtorizzat;
(f)
where applicable, no authorised representative has been appointed;
(g)
d-dokumentazzjoni teknika ma tkunx disponibbli.
(g)
technical documentation is not available.
2. Meta n-nonkonformità msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 tippersisti, l-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq tal-Istat Membru kkonċernat għandha tieħu miżuri xierqa u proporzjonati biex tirrestrinġi jew tipprojbixxi s-sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli milli titqiegħed fis-suq jew biex tiżgura li din tissejjaħ lura jew tiġi rtirata mis-suq mingħajr dewmien.
2. Where the non-compliance referred to in paragraph 1 persists, the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned shall take appropriate and proportionate measures to restrict or prohibit the high-risk AI system being made available on the market or to ensure that it is recalled or withdrawn from the market without delay.
Artikolu 84
Article 84
Strutturi ta’ appoġġ tal-Unjoni għall-ittestjar tal-IA
Union AI testing support structures
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiddeżinja struttura ta’ appoġġ waħda jew aktar tal-Unjoni għall-ittestjar tal-IA biex twettaq il-kompiti elenkati taħt l-Artikolu 21(6) tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 fil-qasam tal-IA.
1. The Commission shall designate one or more Union AI testing support structures to perform the tasks listed under Article 21(6) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 in the area of AI.
2. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-kompiti msemmija fil-paragrafu 1, l-istrutturi ta’ appoġġ tal-Unjoni għall-ittestjar tal-IA għandhom jipprovdu wkoll pariri tekniċi jew xjentifiċi indipendenti fuq talba tal-Bord, tal-Kummissjoni, jew tal-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq.
2. Without prejudice to the tasks referred to in paragraph 1, Union AI testing support structures shall also provide independent technical or scientific advice at the request of the Board, the Commission, or of market surveillance authorities.
TAQSIMA 4
SECTION 4
Rimedji
Remedies
Artikolu 85
Article 85
Dritt li jitressaq ilment quddiem awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq
Right to lodge a complaint with a market surveillance authority
Mingħajr preġudizzju għal rimedji amministrattivi jew ġudizzjarji oħra, kwalunkwe persuna fiżika jew ġuridika li jkollha raġunijiet biex tqis li kien hemm ksur tad-dispożizzjonijiet ta’ dan ir-Regolament tista’ tressaq ilmenti lill-awtorità tas-sorveljanza tas-suq rilevanti.
Without prejudice to other administrative or judicial remedies, any natural or legal person having grounds to consider that there has been an infringement of the provisions of this Regulation may submit complaints to the relevant market surveillance authority.
F’konformità mar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020, tali lmenti għandhom jitqiesu bl-għan li jitwettqu attivitajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq, u għandhom jiġu ttrattati f’konformità mal-proċeduri ddedikati stabbiliti għal dan l-għan mill-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq.
In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, such complaints shall be taken into account for the purpose of conducting market surveillance activities, and shall be handled in line with the dedicated procedures established therefor by the market surveillance authorities.
Artikolu 86
Article 86
Dritt għal spjegazzjoni tat-teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet individwali
Right to explanation of individual decision-making
1. Kwalunkwe persuna affettwata soġġetta għal deċiżjoni li tittieħed mill-implimentatur abbażi tal-output minn sistema tal-IA b’riskju għoli elenkata fl-Anness III, bl-eċċezzjoni tas-sistemi elenkati taħt il-punt 2 tiegħu, u li tipproduċi effetti legali jew taffettwaha b’mod simili u sinifikanti b’tali mod dik il-persuna b’mod tqis li tħalli impatt negattiv fuq is-saħħa, is-sikurezza jew id-drittijiet fundamentali tagħha, għandu jkollha d-dritt li tikseb mill-implimentatur spjegazzjonijiet ċari u sinifikanti tar-rwol tas-sistema tal-IA fil-proċedura tat-teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet u l-elementi ewlenin tad-deċiżjoni meħuda.
1. Any affected person subject to a decision which is taken by the deployer on the basis of the output from a high-risk AI system listed in Annex III, with the exception of systems listed under point 2 thereof, and which produces legal effects or similarly significantly affects that person in a way that they consider to have an adverse impact on their health, safety or fundamental rights shall have the right to obtain from the deployer clear and meaningful explanations of the role of the AI system in the decision-making procedure and the main elements of the decision taken.
2. Il-paragrafu 1 ma għandux japplika għall-użu ta’ sistemi tal-IA li għalihom jirriżultaw eċċezzjonijiet mill-obbligu skont dak il-paragrafu, jew restrizzjonijiet għalih, mil-liġi tal-Unjoni jew dik nazzjonali f'konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to the use of AI systems for which exceptions from, or restrictions to, the obligation under that paragraph follow from Union or national law in compliance with Union law.
3. Dan l-Artikolu għandu japplika biss sa fejn id-dritt imsemmi fil-paragrafu 1 ma jkunx diġà previst mod ieħor fil-liġi tal-Unjoni.
3. This Article shall apply only to the extent that the right referred to in paragraph 1 is not otherwise provided for under Union law.
Artikolu 87
Article 87
Rappurtar ta' ksur u protezzjoni tal-persuni li jirrappurtaw
Reporting of infringements and protection of reporting persons
Id-Direttiva (UE) 2019/1937 għandha tapplika għar-rappurtar ta' ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament u għall-protezzjoni tal-persuni li jirrapportaw tali ksur.
Directive (EU) 2019/1937 shall apply to the reporting of infringements of this Regulation and the protection of persons reporting such infringements.
TAQSIMA 5
SECTION 5
Superviżjoni, investigazzjoni, infurzar u monitoraġġ fir-rigward tal-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Supervision, investigation, enforcement and monitoring in respect of providers of general-purpose AI models
Artikolu 88
Article 88
Infurzar tal-obbligi tal-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Enforcement of the obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandu jkollha setgħat esklużivi biex tissorvelja u tinforza l-Kapitolu V, filwaqt li tqis il-garanziji proċedurali skont l-Artikolu 94. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tafda l-implimentazzjoni ta' dawn il-kompiti lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA, mingħajr preġudizzju għas-setgħat ta' organizzazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni u d-diviżjoni tal-kompetenzi bejn l-Istati Membri u l-Unjoni abbażi tat-Trattati.
1. The Commission shall have exclusive powers to supervise and enforce Chapter V, taking into account the procedural guarantees under Article 94. The Commission shall entrust the implementation of these tasks to the AI Office, without prejudice to the powers of organisation of the Commission and the division of competences between Member States and the Union based on the Treaties.
2. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-Artikolu 75(3), l-awtoritajiet tas-sorveljanza tas-suq jistgħu jitolbu lill-Kummissjoni teżerċita s-setgħat stabbiliti f'din it-Taqsima, fejn dan ikun meħtieġ u proporzjonat biex tgħinhom iwettqu l-kompiti tagħhom skont dan ir-Regolament.
2. Without prejudice to Article 75(3), market surveillance authorities may request the Commission to exercise the powers laid down in this Section, where that is necessary and proportionate to assist with the fulfilment of their tasks under this Regulation.
Artikolu 89
Article 89
Azzjonijiet ta' monitoraġġ
Monitoring actions
1. Għall-fini tat-twettiq tal-kompiti assenjati lilu taħt din it-Taqsima, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jieħu l-azzjonijiet meħtieġa biex jimmonitorja l-implimentazzjoni effettiva u l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament mill-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, inkluż l-aderenza tagħhom mal-kodiċijiet ta' prattika approvati.
1. For the purpose of carrying out the tasks assigned to it under this Section, the AI Office may take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with this Regulation by providers of general-purpose AI models, including their adherence to approved codes of practice.
2. Il-fornituri downstream għandu jkollhom id-dritt li jressqu lment li fih jallegaw ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament. Ilment għandu jkun debitament motivat u jindika mill-inqas:
2. Downstream providers shall have the right to lodge a complaint alleging an infringement of this Regulation. A complaint shall be duly reasoned and indicate at least:
(a)
il-punt ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat;
(a)
the point of contact of the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned;
(b)
deskrizzjoni tal-fatti rilevanti, id-dispożizzjonijiet ta' dan ir-Regolament ikkonċernati u r-raġuni għaliex il-fornitur downstream iqis li l-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat ikun kiser dan ir-Regolament;
(b)
a description of the relevant facts, the provisions of this Regulation concerned, and the reason why the downstream provider considers that the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned infringed this Regulation;
(c)
kwalunkwe informazzjoni oħra li l-fornitur downstream li jkun bagħat it-talba jqis bħala rilevanti, inkluż, fejn xieraq, informazzjoni miġbura fuq l-inizjattiva tiegħu stess.
(c)
any other information that the downstream provider that sent the request considers relevant, including, where appropriate, information gathered on its own initiative.
Artikolu 90
Article 90
Allerti ta' riskji sistemiċi mill-bord
Alerts of systemic risks by the scientific panel
1. Il-bord jista' jagħti allert kwalifikat lill-Uffiċċju għall-IA meta jkollu raġuni biex jissuspetta li:
1. The scientific panel may provide a qualified alert to the AI Office where it has reason to suspect that:
(a)
mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali joħloq riskju identifikabbli konkret fil-livell tal-Unjoni; jew,
(a)
a general-purpose AI model poses concrete identifiable risk at Union level; or
(b)
mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jissodisfa l-kundizzjonijiet imsemmija fl-Artikolu 51.
(b)
a general-purpose AI model meets the conditions referred to in Article 51.
2. Wara tali allert kwalifikat, il-Kummissjoni, permezz tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA u wara li tkun infurmat lill-Bord, tista' teżerċita s-setgħat stabbiliti f'din it-Taqsima bl-għan li tivvaluta l-kwistjoni. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jinforma lill-Bord bi kwalunkwe miżura skont l-Artikoli 91 sa 94.
2. Upon such qualified alert, the Commission, through the AI Office and after having informed the Board, may exercise the powers laid down in this Section for the purpose of assessing the matter. The AI Office shall inform the Board of any measure according to Articles 91 to 94.
3. Allert kwalifikat għandu jkun debitament motivat u jindika mill-inqas:
3. A qualified alert shall be duly reasoned and indicate at least:
(a)
il-punt ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku kkonċernat;
(a)
the point of contact of the provider of the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk concerned;
(b)
deskrizzjoni tal-fatti rilevanti u r-raġunijiet għall-allert mill-bord;
(b)
a description of the relevant facts and the reasons for the alert by the scientific panel;
(c)
kwalunkwe informazzjoni oħra li l-bord iqis bħala rilevanti, inkluż, fejn xieraq, informazzjoni miġbura fuq l-inizjattiva tiegħu stess.
(c)
any other information that the scientific panel considers to be relevant, including, where appropriate, information gathered on its own initiative.
Artikolu 91
Article 91
Setgħa li jintalbu dokumentazzjoni u informazzjoni
Power to request documentation and information
1. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tirrikjedi lill-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat biex jipprovdi d-dokumentazzjoni mfassla mill-fornitur f’konformità mal-Artikoli 53 u 55, jew kwalunkwe informazzjoni addizzjonali li tkun meħtieġa bl-għan li tiġi vvalutata l-konformità tal-fornitur ma' dan ir-Regolament.
1. The Commission may request the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned to provide the documentation drawn up by the provider in accordance with Articles 53 and 55, or any additional information that is necessary for the purpose of assessing compliance of the provider with this Regulation.
2. Qabel ma jibgħat it-talba għal informazzjoni, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jibda djalogu strutturat mal-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali.
2. Before sending the request for information, the AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with the provider of the general-purpose AI model.
3. Fuq talba debitament sostanzjata mill-bord, il-Kummissjoni tista' toħroġ talba għal informazzjoni lil fornitur ta' mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, meta l-aċċess għall-informazzjoni jkun meħtieġ u proporzjonat għat-twettiq tal-kompiti tal-bord skont l-Artikolu 68(2).
3. Upon a duly substantiated request from the scientific panel, the Commission may issue a request for information to a provider of a general-purpose AI model, where the access to information is necessary and proportionate for the fulfilment of the tasks of the scientific panel under Article 68(2).
4. It-talba għal informazzjoni għandha tiddikjara l-bażi legali u l-iskop tat-talba, tispeċifika liema informazzjoni tkun meħtieġa, tistabbilixxi perjodu li fih l-informazzjoni għandha tiġi pprovduta, u tindika l-multi previsti fl-Artikolu 101 għal meta tingħata informazzjoni skorretta, mhux kompluta jew qarrieqa.
4. The request for information shall state the legal basis and the purpose of the request, specify what information is required, set a period within which the information is to be provided, and indicate the fines provided for in Article 101 for supplying incorrect, incomplete or misleading information.
5. Il-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat, jew ir-rappreżentant tiegħu għandhom jipprovdu l-informazzjoni mitluba. Fil-każ ta' persuni ġuridiċi, kumpaniji jew ditti, jew meta l-fornitur ma jkollu l-ebda personalità ġuridika, il-persuni awtorizzati biex jirrappreżentawh skont il-liġi jew l-istatuti tagħhom, għandhom jipprovdu l-informazzjoni mitluba f'isem il-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat. L-avukati debitament awtorizzati biex jaġixxu jistgħu jipprovdu informazzjoni f'isem il-klijenti tagħhom. Madankollu, il-klijenti għandhom jibqgħu responsabbli għalkollox jekk l-informazzjoni pprovduta ma tkunx kompluta, tkun skorretta jew tkun qarrieqa.
5. The provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned, or its representative shall supply the information requested. In the case of legal persons, companies or firms, or where the provider has no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their statutes, shall supply the information requested on behalf of the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply information on behalf of their clients. The clients shall nevertheless remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading.
Artikolu 92
Article 92
Setgħa li jitwettqu evalwazzjonijiet
Power to conduct evaluations
1. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA, wara li jikkonsulta lill-Bord, jista' jwettaq evalwazzjonijiet tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat:
1. The AI Office, after consulting the Board, may conduct evaluations of the general-purpose AI model concerned:
(a)
biex jivvaluta l-konformità tal-fornitur ma' obbligi skont dan ir-Regolament, meta l-informazzjoni miġbura skont l-Artikolu 91 ma tkunx suffiċjenti; jew,
(a)
to assess compliance of the provider with obligations under this Regulation, where the information gathered pursuant to Article 91 is insufficient; or
(b)
biex jinvestiga r-riskji sistemiċi fil-livell tal-Unjoni ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku, b'mod partikolari wara allert kwalifikat mill-bord f'konformità mal-Artikolu 90(1), il-punt (a).
(b)
to investigate systemic risks at Union level of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, in particular following a qualified alert from the scientific panel in accordance with Article 90(1), point (a).
2. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tiddeċiedi li taħtar esperti indipendenti biex iwettqu evalwazzjonijiet f'isimha, inkluż mill-bord stabbilit skont l-Artikolu 68. L-esperti indipendenti maħtura għal dan il-kompitu għandhom jissodisfaw il-kriterji mniżżla fl-Artikolu 68(2).
2. The Commission may decide to appoint independent experts to carry out evaluations on its behalf, including from the scientific panel established pursuant to Article 68. Independent experts appointed for this task shall meet the criteria outlined in Article 68(2).
3. Għall-finijiet tal-paragrafu 1, il-Kummissjoni tista' titlob aċċess għall-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat permezz ta' APIs jew mezzi u għodod tekniċi xierqa ulterjuri, inkluż kodiċi tas-sors.
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission may request access to the general-purpose AI model concerned through APIs or further appropriate technical means and tools, including source code.
4. It-talba għall-aċċess għandha tiddikjara l-bażi legali, l-iskop u r-raġunijiet tat-talba u tistabbilixxi ż-żmien li fih l-aċċess għandu jiġi pprovdut, u l-multi previsti fl-Artikolu 101 għal meta ma jingħatax l-aċċess.
4. The request for access shall state the legal basis, the purpose and reasons of the request and set the period within which the access is to be provided, and the fines provided for in Article 101 for failure to provide access.
5. Il-fornituri tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat jew ir-rappreżentant tiegħu għandhom ifornu l-informazzjoni mitluba. Fil-każ ta' persuni ġuridiċi, kumpaniji jew ditti, jew meta l-fornitur ma jkollu l-ebda personalità ġuridika, il-persuni awtorizzati biex jirrappreżentawhom skont il-liġi jew l-istatuti tagħhom għandhom jagħtu l-aċċess mitlub f'isem il-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat.
5. The providers of the general-purpose AI model concerned or its representative shall supply the information requested. In the case of legal persons, companies or firms, or where the provider has no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their statutes, shall provide the access requested on behalf of the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni li jistipulaw l-arranġamenti dettaljati u l-kundizzjonijiet għall-evalwazzjonijiet, inkluż l-arranġamenti dettaljati għall-involviment ta' esperti indipendenti, u l-proċedura għall-għażla tagħhom. Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
6. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts setting out the detailed arrangements and the conditions for the evaluations, including the detailed arrangements for involving independent experts, and the procedure for the selection thereof. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
7. Qabel ma jitlob aċċess għall-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali kkonċernat, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jibda djalogu strutturat mal-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali biex jiġbor aktar informazzjoni dwar l-ittestjar intern tal-mudell, is-salvagwardji interni għall-prevenzjoni ta' riskji sistemiċi, u proċeduri u miżuri interni oħra li l-fornitur ikun ħa biex jiġu mitigati dawn ir-riskji.
7. Prior to requesting access to the general-purpose AI model concerned, the AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with the provider of the general-purpose AI model to gather more information on the internal testing of the model, internal safeguards for preventing systemic risks, and other internal procedures and measures the provider has taken to mitigate such risks.
Artikolu 93
Article 93
Setgħa li jintalbu miżuri
Power to request measures
1. Fejn meħtieġ u xieraq, il-Kummissjoni tista' titlob lill-fornituri:
1. Where necessary and appropriate, the Commission may request providers to:
(a)
jieħdu miżuri xierqa biex jikkonformaw mal-obbligi stipulati fl-Artikoli 53 u 54;
(a)
take appropriate measures to comply with the obligations set out in Articles 53 and 54;
(b)
jimplimentaw miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni, meta l-evalwazzjoni mwettqa f'konformità mal-Artikolu 92 tkun wasslet għal tħassib serju u sostanzjat ta' riskju sistemiku fil-livell tal-Unjoni;
(b)
implement mitigation measures, where the evaluation carried out in accordance with Article 92 has given rise to serious and substantiated concern of a systemic risk at Union level;
(c)
jirrestrinġu t-tqegħid fis-suq, jirtiraw jew isejħu lura l-mudell.
(c)
restrict the making available on the market, withdraw or recall the model.
2. Qabel ma tintalab miżura, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jista' jibda djalogu strutturat mal-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali.
2. Before a measure is requested, the AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with the provider of the general-purpose AI model.
3. Jekk, matul id-djalogu strutturat imsemmi fil-paragrafu 2, il-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku joffri impenji biex jiġu implimentati miżuri ta' mitigazzjoni biex jiġi indirizzat riskju sistemiku fil-livell tal-Unjoni, il-Kummissjoni tista', permezz ta' deċiżjoni, tagħmel dawk l-impenji vinkolanti u tiddikjara li ma jkun hemm ebda raġuni oħra għal azzjoni.
3. If, during the structured dialogue referred to in paragraph 2, the provider of the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk offers commitments to implement mitigation measures to address a systemic risk at Union level, the Commission may, by decision, make those commitments binding and declare that there are no further grounds for action.
Artikolu 94
Article 94
Drittijiet proċedurali tal-operaturi ekonomiċi tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Procedural rights of economic operators of the general-purpose AI model
L-Artikolu 18 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 għandu japplika mutatis mutandis għall-fornituri tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali mingħajr preġudizzju għad-drittijiet proċedurali aktar speċifiċi previsti f'dan ir-Regolament.
Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the providers of the general-purpose AI model, without prejudice to more specific procedural rights provided for in this Regulation.
KAPITOLU X
CHAPTER X
KODIĊIJIET TAL-KONDOTTA U LINJI GWIDA
CODES OF CONDUCT AND GUIDELINES
Artikolu 95
Article 95
Kodiċijiet tal-kondotta għall-applikazzjoni volontarja ta' rekwiżiti speċifiċi
Codes of conduct for voluntary application of specific requirements
1. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Istati Membri għandhom jinkoraġġixxu u jiffaċilitaw it-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet tal-kondotta, inkluż mekkaniżmi ta' governanza relatati, maħsuba biex irawmu l-applikazzjoni volontarja għal sistemi tal-IA għajr sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli ta' xi wħud mir-rekwiżiti jew ir-rekwiżiti kollha stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, Taqsima 2, filwaqt li jqisu s-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi disponibbli u l-aħjar prattiki tal-industrija li jippermettu l-applikazzjoni ta' dawn ir-rekwiżiti.
1. The AI Office and the Member States shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct, including related governance mechanisms, intended to foster the voluntary application to AI systems, other than high-risk AI systems, of some or all of the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 taking into account the available technical solutions and industry best practices allowing for the application of such requirements.
2. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Istati Membri għandhom jiffaċilitaw it-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet tal-kondotta li jikkonċernaw l-applikazzjoni volontarja, inkluż mill-implimentaturi, ta' rekwiżiti speċifiċi għas-sistemi kollha tal-IA, abbażi ta' objettivi ċari u indikaturi ewlenin tal-prestazzjoni biex titkejjel il-kisba ta' dawk l-objettivi, inkluż elementi bħal, iżda mhux limitati għal:
2. The AI Office and the Member States shall facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct concerning the voluntary application, including by deployers, of specific requirements to all AI systems, on the basis of clear objectives and key performance indicators to measure the achievement of those objectives, including elements such as, but not limited to:
(a)
l-elementi applikabbli previsti fil-linji gwida tal-Unjoni dwar l-etika għal IA affidabbli;
(a)
applicable elements provided for in Union ethical guidelines for trustworthy AI;
(b)
il-valutazzjoni u l-minimizzazzjoni tal-impatt tas-sistemi tal-IA fuq is-sostenibbiltà ambjentali, inkluż fir-rigward ta' programmar effiċjenti fl-użu tal-enerġija u tekniki għad-disinn, it-taħriġ u l-użu effiċjenti tal-IA;
(b)
assessing and minimising the impact of AI systems on environmental sustainability, including as regards energy-efficient programming and techniques for the efficient design, training and use of AI;
(c)
il-promozzjoni tal-litteriżmu fl-IA, b'mod partikolari dak ta' persuni li jkollhom x'jaqsmu mal-iżvilupp, it-tħaddim u l-użu tal-IA;
(c)
promoting AI literacy, in particular that of persons dealing with the development, operation and use of AI;
(d)
l-iffaċilitar ta' disinn inklużiv u divers tas-sistemi tal-IA, inkluż permezz tal-istabbiliment ta' timijiet ta' żvilupp inklużivi u diversi u l-promozzjoni tal-parteċipazzjoni tal-partijiet ikkonċernati f'dak il-proċess;
(d)
facilitating an inclusive and diverse design of AI systems, including through the establishment of inclusive and diverse development teams and the promotion of stakeholders’ participation in that process;
(e)
il-valutazzjoni u l-prevenzjoni tal-impatt negattiv tas-sistemi tal-IA fuq persuni vulnerabbli jew gruppi ta' persuni vulnerabbli, inkluż fir-rigward tal-aċċessibbiltà għall-persuni b'diżabilità, kif ukoll fuq l-ugwaljanza bejn il-ġeneri.
(e)
assessing and preventing the negative impact of AI systems on vulnerable persons or groups of vulnerable persons, including as regards accessibility for persons with a disability, as well as on gender equality.
3. Il-kodiċijiet tal-kondotta jistgħu jitfasslu minn fornituri jew implimentaturi individwali ta' sistemi tal-IA jew minn organizzazzjonijiet li jirrappreżentawhom jew mit-tnejn li huma, inkluż bl-involviment ta' kwalunkwe parti kkonċernata interessata u l-organizzazzjonijiet rappreżentattivi tagħhom, inkluż l-organizzazzjonijiet tas-soċjetà ċivili u d-dinja akkademika. Il-kodiċijiet tal-kondotta jistgħu jkopru sistema waħda jew aktar tal-IA filwaqt li titqies is-similarità tal-għan maħsub tas-sistemi rilevanti.
3. Codes of conduct may be drawn up by individual providers or deployers of AI systems or by organisations representing them or by both, including with the involvement of any interested stakeholders and their representative organisations, including civil society organisations and academia. Codes of conduct may cover one or more AI systems taking into account the similarity of the intended purpose of the relevant systems.
4. L-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-Istati Membri għandhom iqisu l-interessi u l-ħtiġijiet speċifiċi tal-SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda, meta jħeġġu u jiffaċilitaw it-tfassil ta' kodiċijiet tal-kondotta.
4. The AI Office and the Member States shall take into account the specific interests and needs of SMEs, including start-ups, when encouraging and facilitating the drawing up of codes of conduct.
Artikolu 96
Article 96
Linji gwida mill-Kummissjoni dwar l-implimentazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament
Guidelines from the Commission on the implementation of this Regulation
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżviluppa linji gwida dwar l-implimentazzjoni prattika ta' dan ir-Regolament, u b'mod partikolari dwar:
1. The Commission shall develop guidelines on the practical implementation of this Regulation, and in particular on:
(a)
l-applikazzjoni tar-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi msemmija fl-Artikoli 8 sa 15 u fl-Artikolu 25;
(a)
the application of the requirements and obligations referred to in Articles 8 to 15 and in Article 25;
(b)
il-prattiki pprojbiti msemmija fl-Artikolu 5;
(b)
the prohibited practices referred to in Article 5;
(c)
l-implimentazzjoni prattika tad-dispożizzjonijiet relatati ma' modifika sostanzjali;
(c)
the practical implementation of the provisions related to substantial modification;
(d)
l-implimentazzjoni prattika tal-obbligi ta' trasparenza stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 50;
(d)
the practical implementation of transparency obligations laid down in Article 50;
(e)
informazzjoni dettaljata dwar ir-relazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament mal-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fl-Anness I, kif ukoll ma' liġijiet rilevanti oħra tal-Unjoni, inkluż fir-rigward tal-konsistenza fl-infurzar tagħhom;
(e)
detailed information on the relationship of this Regulation with the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I, as well as with other relevant Union law, including as regards consistency in their enforcement;
(f)
l-applikazzjoni tad-definizzjoni ta' sistema tal-IA kif stipulat fl-Artikolu 3, il-punt (1).
(f)
the application of the definition of an AI system as set out in Article 3, point (1).
Meta toħroġ tali linji gwida, il-Kummissjoni għandha tagħti attenzjoni partikolari lill-ħtiġijiet tal-SMEs inkluż tan-negozji ġodda, tal-awtoritajiet pubbliċi lokali u tas-setturi li x'aktarx jiġu affettwati minn dan ir-Regolament.
When issuing such guidelines, the Commission shall pay particular attention to the needs of SMEs including start-ups, of local public authorities and of the sectors most likely to be affected by this Regulation.
Il-linji gwida msemmija fl-ewwel subparagrafu ta’ dan il-paragrafu għandhom iqisu kif xieraq l-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku ġeneralment rikonoxxut dwar l-IA, kif ukoll l-istandards armonizzati u l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni rilevanti msemmija fl-Artikoli 40 u 41, jew dawk l-istandards armonizzati jew l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi li huma stipulati skont il-liġi tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni.
The guidelines referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall take due account of the generally acknowledged state of the art on AI, as well as of relevant harmonised standards and common specifications that are referred to in Articles 40 and 41, or of those harmonised standards or technical specifications that are set out pursuant to Union harmonisation law.
2. Fuq talba tal-Istati Membri jew tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA, jew fuq l-inizjattiva tagħha stess, il-Kummissjoni għandha taġġorna l-linji gwida adottati preċedentement meta jitqies li jkun meħtieġ.
2. At the request of the Member States or the AI Office, or on its own initiative, the Commission shall update guidelines previously adopted when deemed necessary.
KAPITOLU XI
CHAPTER XI
DELEGA TAS-SETGĦA U PROĊEDURA TA' KUMITAT
DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE
Artikolu 97
Article 97
Eżerċizzju tad-delega
Exercise of the delegation
1. Il-Kummissjoni hija mogħtija s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati soġġett għall-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti f'dan l-Artikolu.
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
2. Is-setgħa ta' adozzjoni ta' atti delegati msemmija fl-Artikolu 6(6) u (7), fl-Artikolu 7(1) u (3), fl-Artikolu 11(3), fl-Artikolu 43(5) u (6), fl-Artikolu 47(5), fl-Artikolu 51(3), fl-Artikolu 52(4) u fl-Artikolu 53(5) u (6) għandha tingħata lill-Kummissjoni għal perjodu ta' ħames snin mill-1 ta’ Awwissu 2024. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tfassal rapport fir-rigward tad-delega ta' setgħa mhux iktar tard minn disa' xhur qabel it-tmiem tal-perjodu ta' ħames snin. Id-delega ta' setgħa għandha tiġi estiża b'mod taċitu għal perjodi ta' żmien identiċi, ħlief jekk il-Parlament Ewropew jew il-Kunsill jopponu tali estensjoni mhux aktar tard minn tliet xhur qabel it-tmiem ta' kull perjodu.
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6(6) and (7), Article 7(1) and (3), Article 11(3), Article 43(5) and (6), Article 47(5), Article 51(3), Article 52(4) and Article 53(5) and (6) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from 1 August 2024. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
3. Id-delega tas-setgħa msemmija fl-Artikolu 6(6) u (7), l-Artikolu 7(1) u (3), l-Artikolu 11(3), l-Artikolu 43(5) u (6), l-Artikolu 47(5), l-Artikolu 51(3), l-Artikolu 52(4) u l-Artikolu 53(5) u (6) tista' tiġi rrevokata fi kwalunkwe mument mill-Parlament Ewropew jew mill-Kunsill. Deċiżjoni ta' revoka għandha ttemm id-delega ta' setgħa speċifikata f'dik id-deċiżjoni. Din għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fil-jum ta' wara dak tal-pubblikazzjoni tagħha f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea jew f'data aktar tard speċifikata fiha. Ma għandhiex taffettwa l-validità ta' kwalunkwe att delegat li diġà jkun fis-seħħ.
3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(6) and (7), Article 7(1) and (3), Article 11(3), Article 43(5) and (6), Article 47(5), Article 51(3), Article 52(4) and Article 53(5) and (6) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
4. Qabel ma tadotta att delegat, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta esperti nnominati minn kull Stat Membru skont il-prinċipji stipulati fil-Ftehim Interistituzzjonali tat-13 ta' April 2016 dwar it-Tfassil Aħjar tal-Liġijiet.
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.
5. Hekk kif tadotta att delegat, il-Kummissjoni għandha tinnotifikah simultanjament lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill.
5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.
6. Att delegat adottat skont l-Artikolu 6(6) jew (7), l-Artikolu 7(1) jew (3), l-Artikolu 11(3), l-Artikolu 43(5) jew (6), l-Artikolu 47(5), l-Artikolu 51(3), l-Artikolu 52(4) jew l-Artikolu 53(5) jew (6) għandu jidħol fis-seħħ biss jekk ma tiġix espressa ebda oġġezzjoni la mill-Parlament Ewropew u lanqas mill-Kunsill fi żmien tliet xhur min-notifika ta' dak l-att lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill jew jekk, qabel ma jiskadi dak il-perjodu, il-Parlament Ewropew u l-Kunsill it-tnejn ikunu infurmaw lill-Kummissjoni li mhumiex ser joġġezzjonaw. Dak il-perjodu għandu jiġi estiż bi tliet xhur fuq l-inizjattiva tal-Parlament Ewropew jew tal-Kunsill.
6. Any delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(6) or (7), Article 7(1) or (3), Article 11(3), Article 43(5) or (6), Article 47(5), Article 51(3), Article 52(4) or Article 53(5) or (6) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by either the European Parliament or the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Artikolu 98
Article 98
Proċedura ta' kumitat
Committee procedure
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tkun megħjuna minn kumitat. Dak il-kumitat għandu jkun kumitat skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 182/2011.
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
2. Meta ssir referenza għal dan il-paragrafu, għandu japplika l-Artikolu 5 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 182/2011.
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
KAPITOLU XII
CHAPTER XII
PENALI
PENALTIES
Artikolu 99
Article 99
Penali
Penalties
1. F'konformità mat-termini u l-kundizzjonijiet stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament, l-Istati Membri għandhom jistabbilixxu r-regoli dwar il-penali u l-miżuri l-oħra ta' infurzar, li jistgħu jinkludu wkoll twissijiet u miżuri nonmonetarji, applikabbli għal ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament mill-operaturi, u għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri kollha meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li dawn jiġu implimentati kif xieraq u b'mod effettiv, b’hekk iqisu l-linji gwida maħruġa mill-Kummissjoni skont l-Artikolu 96. Il-penali previsti għandhom ikunu effettivi, proporzjonati u dissważivi. Għandhom iqisu l-interessi tal-SMEs, inkluż in-negozji ġodda u l-vijabbiltà ekonomika tagħhom.
1. In accordance with the terms and conditions laid down in this Regulation, Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties and other enforcement measures, which may also include warnings and non-monetary measures, applicable to infringements of this Regulation by operators, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented, thereby taking into account the guidelines issued by the Commission pursuant to Article 96. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. They shall take into account the interests of SMEs, including start-ups, and their economic viability.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom, mingħajr dewmien u mhux aktar tard mid-data tad-dħul fis-seħħ, jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni bir-regoli dwar il-penali u bil-miżuri ta' infurzar imsemmija fil-paragrafu 1, u għandhom jinnotifikawha, mingħajr dewmien, bi kwalunkwe emenda sussegwenti għalihom.
2. The Member States shall, without delay and at the latest by the date of entry into application, notify the Commission of the rules on penalties and of other enforcement measures referred to in paragraph 1, and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment to them.
3. In-nonkonformità mal-projbizzjoni tal-prattiki tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 5 għandha tkun soġġetta għal multi amministrattivi sa EUR 35 000 000 jew, jekk l-awtur ikun impriża, sa 7 % tal-fatturat annwali globali totali tagħha għas-sena finanzjarja preċedenti, skont liema jkun l-ogħla.
3. Non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 35 000 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 7 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
4. In-nonkonformità ma' kwalunkwe waħda mid-dispożizzjonijiet li ġejjin b'rabta mal-operaturi jew il-korpi notifikati, għajr dawk stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 5, għandha tkun soġġetta għal multi amministrattivi sa EUR 15 000 000 jew, jekk l-awtur ikun impriża, sa 3 % tal-fatturat annwali globali totali tagħha għas-sena finanzjarja preċedenti, skont liema jkun l-ogħla:
4. Non-compliance with any of the following provisions related to operators or notified bodies, other than those laid down in Articles 5, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 15 000 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 3 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:
(a)
l-obbligi tal-fornituri skont l-Artikolu 16;
(a)
obligations of providers pursuant to Article 16;
(b)
l-obbligi tar-rappreżentanti awtorizzati skont l-Artikolu 22;
(b)
obligations of authorised representatives pursuant to Article 22;
(c)
l-obbligi tal-importaturi skont l-Artikolu 23;
(c)
obligations of importers pursuant to Article 23;
(d)
l-obbligi tad-distributuri skont l-Artikolu 24;
(d)
obligations of distributors pursuant to Article 24;
(e)
l-obbligi tal-implimentaturi skont l-Artikolu 26;
(e)
obligations of deployers pursuant to Article 26;
(f)
ir-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi tal-korpi notifikati skont l-Artikolu 31, l-Artikolu 33(1), (3) u(4) jew l-Artikolu 34;
(f)
requirements and obligations of notified bodies pursuant to Article 31, Article 33(1), (3) and (4) or Article 34;
(g)
l-obbligi ta' trasparenza għall-fornituri u l-implimentaturi skont l-Artikolu 50.
(g)
transparency obligations for providers and deployers pursuant to Article 50.
5. Il-forniment ta' informazzjoni skorretta, mhux kompluta jew qarrieqa lill-korpi notifikati jew lill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti bi tweġiba għal talba għandu jkun soġġett għal multi amministrattivi sa EUR 7 500 000 jew, jekk l-awtur ikun impriża, sa 1 % tal-fatturat annwali globali totali tagħha għas-sena finanzjarja preċedenti, skont liema jkun l-ogħla.
5. The supply of incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to notified bodies or national competent authorities in reply to a request shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 7 500 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 1 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
6. Fil-każ ta' SMEs, inkluż negozji ġodda, kull multa msemmija f'dan l-Artikolu ma għandhiex taqbeż il-perċentwali jew l-ammont imsemmija fil-paragrafi 3, 4 u 5, skont liema minnhom ikun l-inqas.
6. In the case of SMEs, including start-ups, each fine referred to in this Article shall be up to the percentages or amount referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, whichever thereof is lower.
7. Meta tittieħed deċiżjoni dwar jekk tiġix imposta multa amministrattiva u dwar l-ammont tal-multa amministrattiva f'kull każ individwali, għandhom jitqiesu ċ-ċirkostanzi rilevanti kollha tas-sitwazzjoni speċifika u, meta jkun xieraq, għandha tingħata attenzjoni lil dawn li ġejjin:
7. When deciding whether to impose an administrative fine and when deciding on the amount of the administrative fine in each individual case, all relevant circumstances of the specific situation shall be taken into account and, as appropriate, regard shall be given to the following:
(a)
in-natura, il-gravità u d-durata tal-ksur u l-konsegwenzi tiegħu, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-iskop tas-sistema tal-IA, kif ukoll, fejn xieraq, in-numru ta' persuni affettwati u l-livell ta' dannu mġarrab minnhom;
(a)
the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences, taking into account the purpose of the AI system, as well as, where appropriate, the number of affected persons and the level of damage suffered by them;
(b)
jekk ikunux diġà ġew applikati multi amministrattivi minn awtoritajiet oħra tas-sorveljanza tas-suq fuq l-istess operatur għall-istess ksur;
(b)
whether administrative fines have already been applied by other market surveillance authorities to the same operator for the same infringement;
(c)
jekk il-multi amministrattivi jkunux diġà ġew applikati minn awtoritajiet oħra fuq l-istess operatur għal ksur ta' liġi oħra tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali, meta tali ksur jirriżulta mill-istess attività jew ommissjoni li tikkostitwixxi ksur rilevanti ta' dan ir-Regolament;
(c)
whether administrative fines have already been applied by other authorities to the same operator for infringements of other Union or national law, when such infringements result from the same activity or omission constituting a relevant infringement of this Regulation;
(d)
id-daqs, il-fatturat annwali u s-sehem mis-suq tal-operatur li jwettaq il-ksur;
(d)
the size, the annual turnover and market share of the operator committing the infringement;
(e)
kwalunkwe fattur aggravanti jew mitiganti ieħor applikabbli għaċ-ċirkostanzi tal-każ, bħal benefiċċji finanzjarji miksuba, jew telf evitat, direttament jew indirettament, mill-ksur;
(e)
any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case, such as financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, directly or indirectly, from the infringement;
(f)
il-grad ta' kooperazzjoni mal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, sabiex jiġi rimedjat il-ksur u jiġu mitigati l-effetti negattivi possibbli tal-ksur;
(f)
the degree of cooperation with the national competent authorities, in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement;
(g)
il-grad ta' responsabbiltà tal-operatur filwaqt li jitqiesu l-miżuri tekniċi u organizzattivi implimentati minnu;
(g)
the degree of responsibility of the operator taking into account the technical and organisational measures implemented by it;
(h)
il-mod li bih il-ksur sar magħruf mill-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti, b'mod partikolari jekk l-operatur innotifika l-ksur, u jekk ikun il-każ, sa liema punt innotifikah;
(h)
the manner in which the infringement became known to the national competent authorities, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the operator notified the infringement;
(i)
il-karattru intenzjonali jew negliġenti tal-ksur;
(i)
the intentional or negligent character of the infringement;
(j)
kwalunkwe azzjoni li tittieħed mill-operatur biex tiġi mitigata l-ħsara mġarrba mill-persuni affettwati.
(j)
any action taken by the operator to mitigate the harm suffered by the affected persons.
8. Kull Stat Membru għandu jistabbilixxi regoli dwar sa liema punt jistgħu jiġu imposti multi amministrattivi fuq l-awtoritajiet u l-korpi pubbliċi stabbiliti f'dak l-Istat Membru.
8. Each Member State shall lay down rules on to what extent administrative fines may be imposed on public authorities and bodies established in that Member State.
9. Skont is-sistema legali tal-Istati Membri, ir-regoli dwar il-multi amministrattivi jistgħu jiġu applikati b'tali mod li l-multi jiġu imposti mill-qrati nazzjonali kompetenti jew minn korpi oħra kif applikabbli f'dawk l-Istati Membri. L-applikazzjoni ta' tali regoli f'dawk l-Istati Membri għandu jkollha effett ekwivalenti.
9. Depending on the legal system of the Member States, the rules on administrative fines may be applied in such a manner that the fines are imposed by competent national courts or by other bodies, as applicable in those Member States. The application of such rules in those Member States shall have an equivalent effect.
10. L-eżerċizzju tas-setgħat taħt dan l-Artikolu għandu jkun soġġett għal salvagwardji proċedurali xierqa f'konformità ma-dritt tal-Unjoni u dak nazzjonali, inkluż rimedji ġudizzjarji u proċess dovut effettivi.
10. The exercise of powers under this Article shall be subject to appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with Union and national law, including effective judicial remedies and due process.
11. Fuq bażi annwali, l-Istati Membri għandhom jirrappurtaw lill-Kummissjoni dwar il-multi amministrattivi li jkunu ħarġu matul dik is-sena, f'konformità ma' dan l-Artikolu, u dwar kwalunkwe litigazzjoni jew proċediment ġudizzjarju relatat.
11. Member States shall, on an annual basis, report to the Commission about the administrative fines they have issued during that year, in accordance with this Article, and about any related litigation or judicial proceedings.
Artikolu 100
Article 100
Multi amministrattivi fuq l-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji u l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni
Administrative fines on Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies
1. Il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data jista' jimponi multi amministrattivi fuq l-istituzzjonijiet, il-korpi, l-uffiċċji u l-aġenziji tal-Unjoni li jaqgħu fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Meta tittieħed deċiżjoni dwar jekk tiġix imposta multa amministrattiva u meta tittieħed deċiżjoni dwar l-ammont tal-multa amministrattiva f'kull każ individwali, għandhom jitqiesu ċ-ċirkostanzi rilevanti kollha tas-sitwazzjoni speċifika u għandha tingħata attenzjoni xierqa lil dawn li ġejjin:
1. The European Data Protection Supervisor may impose administrative fines on Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies falling within the scope of this Regulation. When deciding whether to impose an administrative fine and when deciding on the amount of the administrative fine in each individual case, all relevant circumstances of the specific situation shall be taken into account and due regard shall be given to the following:
(a)
in-natura, il-gravità u d-durata tal-ksur u l-konsegwenzi tiegħu, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-iskop tas-sistema tal-IA kkonċernata, kif ukoll, fejn xieraq, in-numru ta' persuni affettwati u l-livell ta' dannu mġarrab minnhom,;
(a)
the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences, taking into account the purpose of the AI system concerned, as well as, where appropriate, the number of affected persons and the level of damage suffered by them;
(b)
il-grad ta' responsabbiltà tal-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni, filwaqt li jitqiesu l-miżuri tekniċi u organizzattivi implimentati minnhom;
(b)
the degree of responsibility of the Union institution, body, office or agency, taking into account technical and organisational measures implemented by them;
(c)
kwalunkwe azzjoni meħuda mill-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni biex jiġi mitigat id-dannu mġarrab mill-persuni affettwati;
(c)
any action taken by the Union institution, body, office or agency to mitigate the damage suffered by affected persons;
(d)
il-grad ta' kooperazzjoni mal-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data biex jiġi rimedjat il-ksur u jiġu mitigati l-effetti negattivi possibbli tal-ksur, inkluż il-konformità ma' kwalunkwe waħda mill-miżuri li qabel kienu ordnati mill-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data kontra l-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni kkonċernata fir-rigward tal-istess suġġett;
(d)
the degree of cooperation with the European Data Protection Supervisor in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement, including compliance with any of the measures previously ordered by the European Data Protection Supervisor against the Union institution, body, office or agency concerned with regard to the same subject matter;
(e)
kwalunkwe ksur preċedenti simili mill-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni;
(e)
any similar previous infringements by the Union institution, body, office or agency;
(f)
il-mod li bih il-ksur sar magħruf mill-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data, b'mod partikolari jekk l-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni nnotifikawx il-ksur, u jekk ikun hekk il-każ sa liem punt innotifikawh;
(f)
the manner in which the infringement became known to the European Data Protection Supervisor, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the Union institution, body, office or agency notified the infringement;
(g)
il-baġit annwali tal-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni.
(g)
the annual budget of the Union institution, body, office or agency.
2. In-nonkonformità mal-projbizzjoni tal-prattiki tal-IA msemmija fl-Artikolu 5 għandha tkun soġġetta għal multi amministrattivi sa EUR 1 500 000.
2. Non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 1 500 000.
3. In-nonkonformità tas-sistema tal-IA ma' kwalunkwe rekwiżit jew obbligu skont dan ir-Regolament, għajr dawk stabbiliti fl-Artikolu 5, għandha tkun soġġetta għal multi amministrattivi sa EUR 750 000.
3. The non-compliance of the AI system with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, other than those laid down in Article 5, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 750 000.
4. Qabel ma jieħu deċiżjonijiet skont dan l-Artikolu, il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data għandu jagħti lill-istituzzjoni, il-korp, l-uffiċċju jew l-aġenzija tal-Unjoni li hija s-suġġett tal-proċedimenti mwettqa mill-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data l-opportunità li tinstema' dwar il-kwistjoni rigward il-ksur possibbli. Il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data għandu jibbaża d-deċiżjonijiet tiegħu biss fuq elementi u ċirkostanzi li dwarhom il-partijiet ikkonċernati setgħu jikkummentaw. L-ilmenti, jekk ikun hemm, għandhom ikunu assoċjati mill-qrib mal-proċedimenti.
4. Before taking decisions pursuant to this Article, the European Data Protection Supervisor shall give the Union institution, body, office or agency which is the subject of the proceedings conducted by the European Data Protection Supervisor the opportunity of being heard on the matter regarding the possible infringement. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall base his or her decisions only on elements and circumstances on which the parties concerned have been able to comment. Complainants, if any, shall be associated closely with the proceedings.
5. Id-drittijiet tad-difiża tal-partijiet ikkonċernati għandhom ikunu rispettati b'mod sħiħ fil-proċedimenti. Dawn għandhom ikunu intitolati għal aċċess għall-fajl tal-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data, soġġetti għall-interess leġittimu tal-individwi jew tal-impriżi fil-protezzjoni tad-data personali jew tas-sigrieti kummerċjali tagħhom.
5. The rights of defence of the parties concerned shall be fully respected in the proceedings. They shall be entitled to have access to the European Data Protection Supervisor’s file, subject to the legitimate interest of individuals or undertakings in the protection of their personal data or business secrets.
6. Il-fondi miġbura bl-impożizzjoni ta' multi f'dan l-Artikolu għandhom jikkontribwixxu għall-baġit ġenerali tal-Unjoni. Il-multi ma għandhomx jaffettwaw it-tħaddim effettiv tal-istituzzjoni, tal-korp, tal-uffiċċju jew tal-aġenzija tal-Unjoni mmultata.
6. Funds collected by imposition of fines in this Article shall contribute to the general budget of the Union. The fines shall not affect the effective operation of the Union institution, body, office or agency fined.
7. Fuq bażi annwali, il-Kontrollur Ewropew għall-Protezzjoni tad-Data għandu jinnotifika lill-Kummissjoni dwar il-multi amministrattivi li jkun impona skont dan l-Artikolu u dwar kwalunkwe litigazzjoni jew proċediment ġudizzjarju mibdi.
7. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall, on an annual basis, notify the Commission of the administrative fines it has imposed pursuant to this Article and of any litigation or judicial proceedings it has initiated.
Artikolu 101
Article 101
Multi għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Fines for providers of general-purpose AI models
1. Il-Kummissjoni tista' timponi multi fuq il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li ma jaqbżux it-3 % tal-fatturat globali totali annwali tagħhom fis-sena finanzjarja preċedenti jew EUR 15 000 000, skont liema minnhom ikun l-ogħla, meta l-Kummissjoni issib li l-fornitur intenzjonalment jew b'negliġenza:
1. The Commission may impose on providers of general-purpose AI models fines not exceeding 3 % of their annual total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year or EUR 15 000 000, whichever is higher., when the Commission finds that the provider intentionally or negligently:
(a)
kiser id-dispożizzjonijiet rilevanti ta' dan ir-Regolament;
(a)
infringed the relevant provisions of this Regulation;
(b)
naqas milli jikkonforma ma' talba għal dokument jew għal informazzjoni skont l-Artikolu 91, jew ipprovda informazzjoni skorretta, mhux kompluta jew qarrieqa;
(b)
failed to comply with a request for a document or for information pursuant to Article 91, or supplied incorrect, incomplete or misleading information;
(c)
naqas milli jikkonforma ma' miżura mitluba skont l-Artikolu 93;
(c)
failed to comply with a measure requested under Article 93;
(d)
naqas milli jagħmel disponibbli għall-Kummissjoni aċċess għall-IA bi skop ġenerali jew mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku bil-ħsieb li titwettaq evalwazzjoni skont l-Artikolu 92.
(d)
failed to make available to the Commission access to the general-purpose AI model or general-purpose AI model with systemic risk with a view to conducting an evaluation pursuant to Article 92.
Meta jiġi stabbilit l-ammont tal-multa jew tal-pagament perjodiku ta' penali, għandhom jitqiesu n-natura, il-gravità u d-durata tal-ksur, filwaqt li jittieħed kont debitu tal-prinċipji tal-proporzjonalità u l-adegwatezza. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tqis ukoll l-impenji li jkunu saru f'konformità mal-Artikolu 93(3) jew fil-kodiċijiet ta' prattika rilevanti f'konformità mal-Artikolu 56.
In fixing the amount of the fine or periodic penalty payment, regard shall be had to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness. The Commission shall also into account commitments made in accordance with Article 93(3) or made in relevant codes of practice in accordance with Article 56.
2. Qabel ma tadotta d-deċiżjoni skont il-paragrafu 1, il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkomunika s-sejbiet preliminari tagħha lill-fornitur tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u tagħtih l-opportunità li jinstema'.
2. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of the general-purpose AI model and give it an opportunity to be heard.
3. Il-multi imposti f'konformità ma' dan l-Artikolu għandhom ikunu effettiv, proporzjonati u dissważivi.
3. Fines imposed in accordance with this Article shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
4. L-informazzjoni dwar il-multi imposti skont dan l-Artikolu għandha tiġi kkomunikata wkoll lill-Bord kif xieraq.
4. Information on fines imposed under this Article shall also be communicated to the Board as appropriate.
5. Il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea għandu jkollha ġuriżdizzjoni mingħajr limiti sabiex tirrieżamina d-deċiżjonijiet tal-Kummissjoni li jistabbilixxu multa skont dan l-Artikolu. Hija tista' tħassar, tnaqqas jew iżżid il-multa imposta.
5. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions of the Commission fixing a fine under this Article. It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni li fihom arranġamenti dettaljati u salvagwardji proċedurali għal proċedimenti bil-ħsieb tal-adozzjoni possibbli ta' deċiżjonijiet skont il-paragrafu 1 ta' dan l-Artikolu. Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati f'konformità mal-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 98(2).
6. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts containing detailed arrangements and procedural safeguards for proceedings in view of the possible adoption of decisions pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).
KAPITOLU XIII
CHAPTER XIII
DISPOŻIZZJONIJIET FINALI
FINAL PROVISIONS
Artikolu 102
Article 102
Emenda għar-Regolament (KE) Nru 300/2008
Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008
Fl-Artikolu 4(3) tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 300/2008, jiżdied is-subparagrafu li ġej:
In Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008, the following subparagraph is added:
“Meta jiġu adottati miżuri dettaljati relatati mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet u l-proċeduri tekniċi għall-approvazzjoni u l-użu ta' tagħmir tas-sigurtà li jikkonċerna sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*1), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2 ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘When adopting detailed measures related to technical specifications and procedures for approval and use of security equipment concerning Artificial Intelligence systems within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*1), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 103
Article 103
Emenda għar-Regolament (UE) Nru 167/2013
Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 167/2013
Fl-Artikolu 17(5) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 167/2013, jiżdied is-subparagrafu li ġej:
In Article 17(5) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, the following subparagraph is added:
“Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont l-ewwel subparagrafu dwar sistemi tal-intelliġenza artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*2), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2 ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘When adopting delegated acts pursuant to the first subparagraph concerning artificial intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*2), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 104
Article 104
Emenda għar-Regolament (UE) Nru 168/2013
Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 168/2013
Fl-Artikolu 22(5) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 168/2013, jiżdied is-subparagrafu li ġej:
In Article 22(5) of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013, the following subparagraph is added:
“Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont l-ewwel subparagrafu dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*3), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitilu III, it-Taqsima 2 ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘When adopting delegated acts pursuant to the first subparagraph concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*3), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 105
Article 105
Emenda għad-Direttiva 2014/90/UE
Amendment to Directive 2014/90/EU
Fl-Artikolu 8 tad-Direttiva 2014/90/UE, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
In Article 8 of Directive 2014/90/EU, the following paragraph is added:
“5. Għal sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li huma komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*4), meta twettaq l-attivitajiet tagħha skont il-paragrafu 1 u meta jiġu adottati speċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi u standards tal-ittestjar f'konformità mal-paragrafi 2 u 3, il-Kummissjoni għandha tqis ir-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, dak ir-Regolament.
‘5. For Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*4), when carrying out its activities pursuant to paragraph 1 and when adopting technical specifications and testing standards in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, the Commission shall take into account the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation.
Artikolu 106
Article 106
Emenda għad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/797
Amendment to Directive (EU) 2016/797
Fl-Artikolu 5 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/797, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
In Article 5 of Directive (EU) 2016/797, the following paragraph is added:
“12. Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont il-paragrafu 1 u atti ta' implimentazzjoni skont il-paragrafu 11 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*5), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘12. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraph 1 and implementing acts pursuant to paragraph 11 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*5), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 107
Article 107
Emenda għar-Regolament (UE) 2018/858
Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2018/858
Fl-Artikolu 5 tar-Regolament (UE) 2018/858 jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
In Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2018/858 the following paragraph is added:
“4. Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont il-paragrafu 3 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*6), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘4. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraph 3 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*6), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 108
Article 108
Emendi għar-Regolament (UE) 2018/1139
Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1139 huwa emendat kif ġej:
Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 is amended as follows:
(1)
fl-Artikolu 17, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
(1)
in Article 17, the following paragraph is added:
“3. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-paragrafu 2, meta jiġu adottati atti ta' implimentazzjoni skont il-paragrafu 1 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*7), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, when adopting implementing acts pursuant to paragraph 1 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*7), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
(*7) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-13 ta' Ġunju 2024 li jistabbilixxi regoli armonizzati dwar l-intelliġenza artifiċjali () u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 300/2008, (UE) Nru 167/2013, (UE) Nru 168/2013, (UE) 2018/858, (UE) 2018/1139 u (UE) 2019/2144 u d-Direttivi 2014/90/UE, (UE) 2016/797 u (UE) 2020/1828 (l-Att dwar l-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali) (ĠU L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj)”;"
(*7) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj).’;"
(2)
fl-Artikolu 19, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
(2)
in Article 19, the following paragraph is added:
“4. Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont il-paragrafi 1 u 2 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689, għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.”
‘4. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.’
;
;
(3)
fl-Artikolu 43, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
(3)
in Article 43, the following paragraph is added:
“4. Meta jiġu adottati atti ta' implimentazzjoni skont il-paragrafu 1 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689, għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.”
‘4. When adopting implementing acts pursuant to paragraph 1 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.’
;
;
(4)
fl-Artikolu 47, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
(4)
in Article 47, the following paragraph is added:
“3. Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont il-paragrafi 1 u 2 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689, għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.”
‘3. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.’
;
;
(5)
fl-Artikolu 57, jiżdied is-subparagrafu li ġej:
(5)
in Article 57, the following subparagraph is added:
“Meta jiġu adottati dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689, għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.”
‘When adopting those implementing acts concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.’
;
;
(6)
fl-Artikolu 58, jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
(6)
in Article 58, the following paragraph is added:
“3. Meta jiġu adottati atti delegati skont il-paragrafi 1 u 2 dwar sistemi tal-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689, għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.”.
‘3. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 concerning Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.’.
Artikolu 109
Article 109
Emenda għar-Regolament (UE) 2019/2144
Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2019/2144
Fl-Artikolu 11 tar-Regolament (UE) 2019/2144 jiżdied il-paragrafu li ġej:
In Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, the following paragraph is added:
“3. Meta jiġu adottati l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni skont il-paragrafu 2 dwar sistemi tal-intelliġenza artifiċjali li jkunu komponenti tas-sikurezza skont it-tifsira tar-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (*8), għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, ta' dak ir-Regolament.
‘3. When adopting the implementing acts pursuant to paragraph 2, concerning artificial intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*8), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Artikolu 110
Article 110
Emenda għad-Direttiva (UE) 2020/1828
Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1828
Fl-Anness I tad-Direttiva (UE) 2020/1828 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (58), jiżdied il-punt li ġej:
In Annex I to Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council (58), the following point is added:
“(68)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2024/1689 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-13 ta’ Ġunju 2024 li jistabbilixxi regoli armonizzati dwar l-intelliġenza artifiċjali u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 300/2008, (UE) Nru 167/2013, (UE) Nru 168/2013, (UE) 2018/858, (UE) 2018/1139 u (UE) 2019/2144 u d-Direttivi 2014/90/UE, (UE) 2016/797 u (UE) 2020/1828 (l-Att dwar l-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali) (ĠU L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj)”.
‘(68)
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj).’.
Artikolu 111
Article 111
Sistemi tal-IA diġà introdotti fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz u mudeli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali diġà introdotti fis-suq
AI systems already placed on the market or put into service and general-purpose AI models already placed on the marked
1. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-applikazzjoni tal-Artikolu 5 kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 113(3), il-punt (a), is-sistemi tal-IA li huma komponenti tas-sistemi tal-IT fuq skala kbira stabbiliti bl-atti legali elenkati fl-Anness X li jkunu ġew introdotti fis-suq jew tqiegħdu fis-servizz qabel it-2 ta’ Awwissu 2027 għandhom jinġiebu f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament sal-31 ta' Diċembru 2030.
1. Without prejudice to the application of Article 5 as referred to in Article 113(3), point (a), AI systems which are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex X that have been placed on the market or put into service before 2 August 2027 shall be brought into compliance with this Regulation by 31 December 2030.
Ir-rekwiżiti stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament għandhom jitqiesu fl-evalwazzjoni ta' kull sistema tal-IT fuq skala kbira stabbilita bl-atti legali elenkati fl-Anness X li għandha titwettaq kif previst f'dawk l-atti legali u meta dawk l-atti legali jiġu sostitwiti jew emendati.
The requirements laid down in this Regulation shall be taken into account in the evaluation of each large-scale IT system established by the legal acts listed in Annex X to be undertaken as provided for in those legal acts and where those legal acts are replaced or amended.
2. Mingħajr preġudizzju għall-applikazzjoni tal-Artikolu 5 kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 113(3), il-punt (a), dan ir-Regolament għandu japplika għall-operaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, minbarra s-sistemi imsemmija fil-paragrafu 1, li ġew introdotti fis-suq jew li tqiegħdu fis-servizz qabel it-2 ta’ Awwissu 2026, biss jekk, minn dik id-data, dawk is-sistemi jkunu soġġetti għal bidliet sinifikanti fid-disinni tagħhom. Fi kwalunkwe każ, il-fornituri u l-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi għandhom jieħdu l-passi meħtieġa biex jikkonformaw mar-rekwiżiti ta' dan ir-Regolament sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2030.
2. Without prejudice to the application of Article 5 as referred to in Article 113(3), point (a), this Regulation shall apply to operators of high-risk AI systems, other than the systems referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, that have been placed on the market or put into service before 2 August 2026, only if, as from that date, those systems are subject to significant changes in their designs. In any case, the providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems intended to be used by public authorities shall take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements and obligations of this Regulation by 2 August 2030.
3. Il-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li ġew introdotti fis-suq qabel it-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025 għandhom jieħdu l-passi meħtieġa biex jikkonformaw mal-obbligi stabbiliti f'dan ir-Regolament sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2027.
3. Providers of general-purpose AI models that have been placed on the market before 2 August 2025 shall take the necessary steps in order to comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation by 2 August 2027.
Artikolu 112
Article 112
Evalwazzjoni u rieżami
Evaluation and review
1. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tivvaluta l-ħtieġa għal emenda tal-lista fl-Anness III u l-lista ta' prattiki pprojbiti tal-IA stipulata fl-Artikolu 5, darba fis-sena wara d-dħul fis-seħħ ta' dan ir-Regolament, u sa tmiem il-perjodu tad-delega tas-setgħa stipulat fl-Artikolu 97. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tippreżenta s-sejbiet ta' dik il-valutazzjoni lill-Parlament Ewropew u l-Kunsill.
1. The Commission shall assess the need for amendment of the list set out in Annex III and of the list of prohibited AI practices laid down in Article 5, once a year following the entry into force of this Regulation, and until the end of the period of the delegation of power laid down in Article 97. The Commission shall submit the findings of that assessment to the European Parliament and the Council.
2. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2028 u kull erba' snin wara, il-Kummissjoni għandha tevalwa u tirrapporta lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill dwar dan li ġej:
2. By 2 August 2028 and every four years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate and report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the following:
(a)
il-ħtieġa ta' emendi li jestendu l-intestaturi ta' oqsma eżistenti jew li jżidu intestaturi ta' oqsma ġodda fl-Anness III;
(a)
the need for amendments extending existing area headings or adding new area headings in Annex III;
(b)
emendi għall-lista ta' sistemi tal-IA li jirrikjedu miżuri addizzjonali ta' trasparenza fl-Artikolu 50;
(b)
amendments to the list of AI systems requiring additional transparency measures in Article 50;
(c)
emendi li jsaħħu l-effettività tas-sistema ta' superviżjoni u ta' governanza.
(c)
amendments enhancing the effectiveness of the supervision and governance system.
3. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2029 u kull erba' snin wara dan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tippreżenta rapport dwar l-evalwazzjoni u r-rieżami ta' dan ir-Regolament lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill. Ir-rapport għandu jinkludi valutazzjoni fir-rigward tal-istruttura tal-infurzar u l-ħtieġa possibbli ta' aġenzija tal-Unjoni biex issolvi kwalunkwe nuqqas identifikat. Abbażi tas-sejbiet, dak ir-rapport għandu, meta xieraq, ikun akkumpanjat minn proposta għall-emendar ta' dan ir-Regolament. Ir-rapporti għandhom ikunu disponibbli għall-pubbliku.
3. By 2 August 2029 and every four years thereafter, the Commission shall submit a report on the evaluation and review of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall include an assessment with regard to the structure of enforcement and the possible need for a Union agency to resolve any identified shortcomings. On the basis of the findings, that report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amendment of this Regulation. The reports shall be made public.
4. Ir-rapporti msemmija fil-paragrafu 2 għandhom jagħtu attenzjoni speċifika lil dawn li ġejjin:
4. The reports referred to in paragraph 2 shall pay specific attention to the following:
(a)
l-istatus tar-riżorsi finanzjarji, tekniċi u umani tal-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti biex iwettqu b'mod effettiv il-kompiti assenjati lilhom skont dan ir-Regolament;
(a)
the status of the financial, technical and human resources of the national competent authorities in order to effectively perform the tasks assigned to them under this Regulation;
(b)
l-istat tal-penali, b'mod partikolari l-multi amministrattivi kif imsemmija fl-Artikolu 99(1), applikati mill-Istati Membri għall-ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament;
(b)
the state of penalties, in particular administrative fines as referred to in Article 99(1), applied by Member States for infringements of this Regulation;
(c)
l-istandards armonizzati adottati u l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet komuni żviluppati biex jappoġġaw dan ir-Regolament;
(c)
adopted harmonised standards and common specifications developed to support this Regulation;
(d)
in-numru ta' impriżi li jidħlu fis-suq wara d-dħul fis-seħħ ta' dan ir-Regolament u kemm minnhom ikunu SMEs.
(d)
the number of undertakings that enter the market after the entry into application of this Regulation, and how many of them are SMEs.
5. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2028, il-Kummissjoni għandha tevalwa l-funzjonament tal-Uffiċċju għall-IA, jekk l-Uffiċċju għall-IA jkunx ingħata biżżejjed setgħat u kompetenzi biex iwettaq il-kompiti tiegħu u jekk, għall-implimentazzjoni u l-infurzar xierqa ta' dan ir-Regolament, ikunx rilevanti u meħtieġ li jittejbu l-Uffiċċju għall-IA u l-kompetenzi tal-infurzar tiegħu u li jiżdiedu r-riżorsi tiegħu. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tippreżenta r-rapport dwar l-evalwazzjoni tagħha lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill.
5. By 2 August 2028, the Commission shall evaluate the functioning of the AI Office, whether the AI Office has been given sufficient powers and competences to fulfil its tasks, and whether it would be relevant and needed for the proper implementation and enforcement of this Regulation to upgrade the AI Office and its enforcement competences and to increase its resources. The Commission shall submit a report on its evaluation to the European Parliament and to the Council.
6. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2028 u kull erba' snin wara dan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tippreżenta rapport dwar ir-rieżami tal-progress fl-iżvilupp ta' strumenti ta' strumenti ta' standardizzazzjoni dwar l-iżvilupp effiċjenti fl-użu tal-enerġija ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali u tivvaluta l-ħtieġa għal aktar miżuri jew azzjonijiet, inkluż miżuri jew azzjonijiet vinkolanti. Ir-rapport għandu jiġi ppreżentat lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill, u għandu jkun disponibbli għall-pubbliku.
6. By 2 August 2028 and every four years thereafter, the Commission shall submit a report on the review of the progress on the development of standardisation deliverables on the energy-efficient development of general-purpose AI models, and asses the need for further measures or actions, including binding measures or actions. The report shall be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council, and it shall be made public.
7. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2028 u kull tliet snin wara dan, il-Kummissjoni għandha tevalwa l-impatt u l-effettività tal-kodiċijiet tal-kondotta volontarji biex trawwem l-applikazzjoni tar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2 għas-sistemi tal-IA għajr is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli u possibbilment ta' rekwiżiti addizzjonali oħra għas-sistemi tal-IA għajr is-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli, inkluż fir-rigward tas-sostenibbiltà ambjentali.
7. By 2 August 2028 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate the impact and effectiveness of voluntary codes of conduct to foster the application of the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 for AI systems other than high-risk AI systems and possibly other additional requirements for AI systems other than high-risk AI systems, including as regards environmental sustainability.
8. Għall-finijiet tal-paragrafi 1 sa 7, il-Bord, l-Istati Membri u l-awtoritajiet nazzjonali kompetenti għandhom jipprovdu lill-Kummissjoni b'informazzjoni dwar it-talba tagħha u mingħajr dewmien żejjed.
8. For the purposes of paragraphs 1 to 7, the Board, the Member States and national competent authorities shall provide the Commission with information upon its request and without undue delay.
9. Fit-twettiq tal-evalwazzjonijiet u tar-rieżamijiet imsemmija fil-paragrafi 1 sa 7, il-Kummissjoni għandha tqis il-pożizzjonijiet u s-sejbiet tal-Bord, tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill, u ta' korpi jew ta' sorsi rilevanti oħra.
9. In carrying out the evaluations and reviews referred to in paragraphs 1 to 7, the Commission shall take into account the positions and findings of the Board, of the European Parliament, of the Council, and of other relevant bodies or sources.
10. Jekk ikun meħtieġ, il-Kummissjoni għandha tippreżenta proposti xierqa biex jiġi emendat dan ir-Regolament, b'mod partikolari billi tqis l-iżviluppi fit-teknoloġija, l-effett tas-sistemi tal-IA fuq is-saħħa u s-sikurezza, u fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali, u fid-dawl tal-istat tal-progress fis-soċjetà tal-informazzjoni.
10. The Commission shall, if necessary, submit appropriate proposals to amend this Regulation, in particular taking into account developments in technology, the effect of AI systems on health and safety, and on fundamental rights, and in light of the state of progress in the information society.
11. Biex jiġu ggwidati l-evalwazzjonijiet u r-rieżamijiet imsemmija fil-paragrafi 1 sa 7 ta' dan l-Artikolu, l-Uffiċċju għall-IA għandu jimpenja ruħu li jiżviluppa metodoloġija oġġettiva u parteċipattiva għall-evalwazzjoni tal-livelli tar-riskju bbażata fuq il-kriterji deskritti fl-Artikoli rilevanti u l-inklużjoni ta' sistemi ġodda:
11. To guide the evaluations and reviews referred to in paragraphs 1 to 7 of this Article, the AI Office shall undertake to develop an objective and participative methodology for the evaluation of risk levels based on the criteria outlined in the relevant Articles and the inclusion of new systems in:
(a)
fil-lista stipulata fl-Anness III, inkluż l-estensjoni ta' intestaturi ta' oqsma eżistenti jew iż-żieda ta' intestaturi ta' oqsma ġodda f'dak l-Anness;
(a)
the list set out in Annex III, including the extension of existing area headings or the addition of new area headings in that Annex;
(b)
fil-lista ta' prattiki pprojbiti stipulata fl-Artikolu 5; u,
(b)
the list of prohibited practices set out in Article 5; and
(c)
fil-lista ta' sistemi tal-IA li jirrikjedu miżuri addizzjonali ta' trasparenza skont l-Artikolu 50.
(c)
the list of AI systems requiring additional transparency measures pursuant to Article 50.
12. Kwalunkwe emenda għal dan ir-Regolament skont il-paragrafu 10, jew atti delegati jew ta' implimentazzjoni rilevanti, li jikkonċernaw il-leġiżlazzjoni settorjali tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni elenkata fit-Taqsima B tal-Anness I għandha tqis l-ispeċifiċitajiet regolatorji ta' kull settur, u l-mekkaniżmi u l-awtoritajiet eżistenti ta' governanza, ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità u ta' infurzar stabbiliti fihom.
12. Any amendment to this Regulation pursuant to paragraph 10, or relevant delegated or implementing acts, which concerns sectoral Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section B of Annex I shall take into account the regulatory specificities of each sector, and the existing governance, conformity assessment and enforcement mechanisms and authorities established therein.
13. Sat-2 ta’ Awwissu 2031, il-Kummissjoni għandha twettaq valutazzjoni tal-infurzar ta' dan ir-Regolament u għandha tirrapportaha dwarha lill-Parlament Ewropew, lill-Kunsill u lill-Kumitat Ekonomiku u Soċjali Ewropew, filwaqt li tqis l-ewwel snin tal-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament. Abbażi tas-sejbiet, dak ir-rapport għandu, meta xieraq, ikun akkumpanjat minn proposta għall-emendar ta' dan ir-Regolament fir-rigward tal-istruttura tal-infurzar u l-ħtieġa ta' aġenzija tal-Unjoni biex issolvi kwalunkwe nuqqas identifikat.
13. By 2 August 2031, the Commission shall carry out an assessment of the enforcement of this Regulation and shall report on it to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, taking into account the first years of application of this Regulation. On the basis of the findings, that report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amendment of this Regulation with regard to the structure of enforcement and the need for a Union agency to resolve any identified shortcomings.
Artikolu 113
Article 113
Dħul fis-seħħ u applikazzjoni
Entry into force and application
Dan ir-Regolament għandu jidħol fis-seħħ fl-għoxrin jum wara dak tal-pubblikazzjoni tiegħu f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Għandu japplika mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2026.
It shall apply from 2 August 2026.
Madanakollu:
However:
(a)
il-Kapitoli I u II għandhom japplikaw mit-2 ta’ Frar 2025;
(a)
Chapters I and II shall apply from 2 February 2025;
(b)
Il-Kapitolu III it-Taqsima 4, il-Kapitolu V, il-Kapitolu VII u l-Kapitolu XII u l-Artikolu 78 għandhom japplikaw mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2025, bl-eċċezzjoni tal-Artikolu 101;
(b)
Chapter III Section 4, Chapter V, Chapter VII and Chapter XII and Article 78 shall apply from 2 August 2025, with the exception of Article 101;
(c)
L-Artikolu 6(1) u l-obbligi korrispondenti f'dan ir-Regolament għandhom japplikaw mit-2 ta’ Awwissu 2027.
(c)
Article 6(1) and the corresponding obligations in this Regulation shall apply from 2 August 2027.
Dan ir-Regolament għandu jorbot fl-intier tiegħu u japplika direttament fl-Istati Membri kollha.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Magħmul fi Brussell, it-13 ta’ Ġunju 2024.
Done at Brussels, 13 June 2024.
Għall-Parlament Ewropew
For the European Parliament
Il-President
The President
R. METSOLA
R. METSOLA
Għall-Kunsill
For the Council
Il-President
The President
M. MICHEL
M. MICHEL
(1) ĠU C 517, 22.12.2021, p. 56.
(1) OJ C 517, 22.12.2021, p. 56.
(2) ĠU C 115, 11.3.2022, p. 5.
(2) OJ C 115, 11.3.2022, p. 5.
(3) ĠU C 97, 28.2.2022, p. 60.
(3) OJ C 97, 28.2.2022, p. 60.
(4) Il-Pożizzjoni tal-Parlament Ewropew tat-13 ta’ Marzu 2024 (għadha mhix ippubblikata fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali) u Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill tal-21 ta’ Mejju 2024.
(4) Position of the European Parliament of 13 March 2024 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 21 May 2024.
(5) Kunsill Ewropew, Laqgħa Speċjali tal-Kunsill Ewropew (l-1 u t-2 ta' Ottubru 2020) - Konklużjonijiet, EUCO 13/20, 2020, p. 6.
(5) European Council, Special meeting of the European Council (1 and 2 October 2020) — Conclusions, EUCO 13/20, 2020, p. 6.
(6) Ir-Riżoluzzjoni tal-Parlament Ewropew tal-20 ta' Ottubru 2020 b'rakkomandazzjonijiet għall-Kummissjoni dwar qafas tal-aspetti etiċi tal-intelliġenza artifiċjali, ir-robotika u teknoloġiji relatati, 2020/2012(INL).
(6) European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, 2020/2012(INL).
(7) Ir-Regolament (KE) 765/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tad-9 ta' Lulju 2008 li jistabbilixxi r-rekwiżiti għall-akkreditament, u li jħassar ir-Regolament (KEE) Nru 339/93 (ĠU L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30).
(7) Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30).
(8) Id-Deċiżjoni Nru 768/2008/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tad-9 ta' Lulju 2008 dwar qafas komuni għall-kummerċjalizzazzjoni ta' prodotti u li tħassar id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 93/465/KEE (ĠU L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 82).
(8) Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of products, and repealing Council Decision 93/465/EEC (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 82).
(9) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/1020 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-20 ta' Ġunju 2019 dwar is-sorveljanza tas-suq u l-konformità tal-prodotti u li jemenda d-Direttiva 2004/42/KE u r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 765/2008 u (UE) Nru 305/2011 (ĠU L 169, 25.6.2019, p. 1).
(9) Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on market surveillance and compliance of products and amending Directive 2004/42/EC and Regulations (EC) No 765/2008 and (EU) No 305/2011 (OJ L 169, 25.6.2019, p. 1).
(10) Id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 85/374/KEE tal-25 ta' Lulju 1985 dwar l-approssimazzjoni tal-liġijiet, regolamenti u dispożizzjonijiet amministrattivi tal-Istati Membri dwar responsabbiltà għall-prodotti difettużi (ĠU L 210, 7.8.1985, p. 29).
(10) Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ L 210, 7.8.1985, p. 29).
(11) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-27 ta' April 2016 dwar il-protezzjoni tal-persuni fiżiċi fir-rigward tal-ipproċessar ta' data personali u dwar il-moviment liberu ta' tali data, u li jħassar id-Direttiva 95/46/KE (Regolament Ġenerali dwar il-Protezzjoni tad-Data) (ĠU L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
(11) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
(12) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1725 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-23 ta' Ottubru 2018 dwar il-protezzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi fir-rigward tal-ipproċessar ta' data personali mill-istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji u aġenziji tal-Unjoni u dwar il-moviment liberu ta' tali data, u li jħassar ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 45/2001 u d-Deċiżjoni Nru 1247/2002/KE (ĠU L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
(12) Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
(13) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-27 ta' April 2016 dwar il-protezzjoni ta' persuni fiżiċi fir-rigward tal-ipproċessar ta' data personali mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti għall-finijiet tal-prevenzjoni, l-investigazzjoni, is-sejbien jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali jew l-eżekuzzjoni ta' pieni kriminali, u dwar il-moviment liberu ta' tali data, u li tħassar id-Deċiżjoni Qafas tal-Kunsill 2008/977/ĠAI (ĠU L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).
(13) Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).
(14) Id-Direttiva 2002/58/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-12 ta' Lulju 2002 dwar l-ipproċessar tad-data personali u l-protezzjoni tal-privatezza fis-settur tal-komunikazzjoni elettronika (Direttiva dwar il-privatezza u l-komunikazzjoni elettronika), (ĠU L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
(14) Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
(15) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2022/2065 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tad-19 ta’ Ottubru 2022 dwar Suq Uniku għas-Servizzi Diġitali u li jemenda d-Direttiva 2000/31/KE (l-Att dwar is-Servizzi Diġitali) (ĠU L 277, 27.10.2022, p. 1).
(15) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, p. 1).
(16) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2019/882 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta' April 2019 dwar ir-rekwiżiti ta' aċċessibbiltà għall-prodotti u għas-servizzi (ĠU L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 70).
(16) Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 70).
(17) Id-Direttiva 2005/29/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-11 ta' Mejju 2005 dwar prattiċi kummerċjali żleali fin-negozju mal-konsumatur fis-suq intern li temenda d-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 84/450/KEE, id-Direttivi 97/7/KE, 98/27/KE u 2002/65/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, u r-Regolament (KE) Nru 2006/2004 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (“Direttiva dwar Prattiċi Kummerċjali Żleali”) (ĠU L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 22).
(17) Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 22).
(18) Id-Deċiżjoni Kwadru tal-Kunsill 2002/584/JHA tat-13 ta' Ġunju 2002 fuq il-mandat ta' arrest Ewropew u l-proċeduri ta' ċediment bejn l-Istati Membri (ĠU L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).
(18) Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).
(19) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2022/2557 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-14 ta' Diċembru 2022 dwar ir-reżiljenza tal-entitajiet kritiċi u li tħassar id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 2008/114/KE (ĠU L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 164).
(19) Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 164).
(20) ĠU C 247, 29.6.2022, p. 1.
(20) OJ C 247, 29.6.2022, p. 1.
(21) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2017/745 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' April 2017 dwar apparati mediċi, li jemenda d-Direttiva 2001/83/KE, ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 178/2002 u r-Regolament (KE) Nru 1223/2009 u li jħassar id-Direttivi tal-Kunsill 90/385/KEE u 93/42/KEE (ĠU L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1).
(21) Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1).
(22) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2017/746 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' April 2017 dwar apparati mediċi dijanjostiċi in vitro u li jħassar id-Direttiva 98/79/KE u d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2010/227/UE (ĠU L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 176).
(22) Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 176).
(23) Id-Direttiva 2006/42/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta' Mejju 2006 dwar il-makkinarju, u li temenda d-Direttiva 95/16/KE (ĠU L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24).
(23) Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24).
(24) Ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 300/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-11 ta' Marzu 2008 dwar regoli komuni fil-qasam tas-sigurtà tal-avjazzjoni ċivili u li jħassar ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 2320/2002 (ĠU L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 72).
(24) Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 (OJ L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 72).
(25) Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 167/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' Frar 2013 dwar l-approvazzjoni u s-sorveljanza tas-suq ta' vetturi għall-agrikoltura u għall-forestrija (ĠU L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 1).
(25) Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 February 2013 on the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (OJ L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 1).
(26) Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 168/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-15 ta' Jannar 2013 dwar l-approvazzjoni u s-sorveljanza tas-suq ta' vetturi b'żewġ jew tliet roti u kwadriċikli (ĠU L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 52).
(26) Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the approval and market surveillance of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (OJ L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 52).
(27) Id-Direttiva 2014/90/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-23 ta' Lulju 2014 dwar tagħmir tal-baħar u li tħassar id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 96/98/KE (ĠU L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146).
(27) Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council Directive 96/98/EC (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146).
(28) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/797 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-11 ta' Mejju 2016 dwar l-interoperabbiltà tas-sistema ferrovjarja fl-Unjoni Ewropea (ĠU L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44).
(28) Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44).
(29) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/858 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-30 ta' Mejju 2018 dwar l-approvazzjoni u s-sorveljanza tas-suq ta' vetturi bil-mutur u t-trejlers tagħhom, u ta' sistemi, komponenti u unitajiet tekniċi separati maħsuba għal tali vetturi, li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 715/2007 u (KE) Nru 595/2009 u li jħassar id-Direttiva 2007/46/KE (ĠU L 151, 14.6.2018, p. 1).
(29) Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC (OJ L 151, 14.6.2018, p. 1).
(30) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1139 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-4 ta' Lulju 2018 dwar regoli komuni fil-qasam tal-avjazzjoni ċivili u li jistabbilixxi Aġenzija tas-Sikurezza tal-Avjazzjoni tal-Unjoni Ewropea, u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 2111/2005, (KE) Nru 1008/2008, (UE) Nru 996/2010, (UE) Nru 376/2014 u d-Direttivi 2014/30/UE u 2014/53/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, u li jħassar ir-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 552/2004 u (KE) Nru 216/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u r-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KEE) Nru 3922/91 (ĠU L 212, 22.8.2018, p. 1).
(30) Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (OJ L 212, 22.8.2018, p. 1).
(31) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/2144 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-27 ta' Novembru 2019 dwar rekwiżiti tal-approvazzjoni tat-tip għall-vetturi bil-mutur u t-trejlers tagħhom, kif ukoll għas-sistemi, għall-komponenti u għall-unitajiet tekniċi separati maħsubin għat-tali vetturi, fir-rigward tas-sikurezza ġenerali tagħhom u tal-protezzjoni tal-okkupanti tal-vetturi u l-utenti vulnerabbli tat-triq, li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) 2018/858 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u li jħassar ir-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 78/2009, (KE) Nru 79/2009 u (KE) Nru 661/2009 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u tar-Regolamenti tal-Kummissjoni (KE) Nru 631/2009, (UE) Nru 406/2010, (UE) Nru 672/2010, (UE) Nru 1003/2010, (UE) Nru 1005/2010, (UE) Nru 1008/2010, (UE) Nru 1009/2010, (UE) Nru 19/2011, (UE) Nru 109/2011, (UE) Nru 458/2011, (UE) Nru 65/2012, (UE) Nru 130/2012, (UE) Nru 347/2012, (UE) Nru 351/2012, (UE) Nru 1230/2012 u (UE) 2015/166 (ĠU L 325, 16.12.2019, p. 1).
(31) Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on type-approval requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, as regards their general safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users, amending Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulations (EC) No 78/2009, (EC) No 79/2009 and (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 631/2009, (EU) No 406/2010, (EU) No 672/2010, (EU) No 1003/2010, (EU) No 1005/2010, (EU) No 1008/2010, (EU) No 1009/2010, (EU) No 19/2011, (EU) No 109/2011, (EU) No 458/2011, (EU) No 65/2012, (EU) No 130/2012, (EU) No 347/2012, (EU) No 351/2012, (EU) No 1230/2012 and (EU) 2015/166 (OJ L 325, 16.12.2019, p. 1).
(32) Ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 810/2009 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-13 ta' Lulju 2009 li jistabbilixxi Kodiċi Komunitarju dwar il-Viżi (Kodiċi dwar il-Viżi) (ĠU L 243, 15.9.2009, p. 1).
(32) Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code) (OJ L 243, 15.9.2009, p. 1).
(33) Id-Direttiva 2013/32/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Ġunju 2013 dwar proċeduri komuni għall-għoti u l-irtirar tal-protezzjoni internazzjonali (ĠU L 180, 29.6.2013, p. 60).
(33) Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ L 180, 29.6.2013, p. 60).
(34) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2024/900 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-13 ta' Marzu 2024 dwar it-trasparenza u l-immirar tar-reklamar politiku (ĠU L, 2024/900, 20.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/900/oj).
(34) Regulation (EU) 2024/900 of the European parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2024 on the transparency and targeting of political advertising (OJ L, 2024/900, 20.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/900/oj).
(35) Id-Direttiva 2014/31/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Frar 2014 dwar l-armonizzazzjoni tal-liġijiet tal-Istati Membri relattivament għad-disponibbiltà fis-suq ta' strumenti tal-użin mhux awtomatiċi (ĠU L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 107).
(35) Directive 2014/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of non-automatic weighing instruments (OJ L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 107).
(36) Id-Direttiva 2014/32/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Frar 2014 dwar l-armonizzazzjoni tal-liġijiet tal-Istati Membri relattivament għat-tqegħid fis-suq ta' strumenti tal-kejl (ĠU L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 149).
(36) Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments (OJ L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 149).
(37) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/881 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta’ April 2019 dwar l-ENISA (l-Aġenzija tal-Unjoni Ewropea għaċ-Ċibersigurtà) u dwar iċ-ċertifikazzjoni taċ-ċibersigurtà tat-teknoloġija tal-informazzjoni u tal-komunikazzjoni u li jħassar ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 526/2013 (l-Att dwar iċ-Ċibersigurtà) (ĠU L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 15).
(37) Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA (the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity) and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No 526/2013 (Cybersecurity Act) (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 15).
(38) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/2102 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Ottubru 2016 dwar l-aċċessibbiltà tas-siti elettroniċi u tal-applikazzjonijiet mobbli tal-korpi tas-settur pubbliku (ĠU L 327, 2.12.2016, p. 1).
(38) Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies (OJ L 327, 2.12.2016, p. 1).
(39) Id-Direttiva 2002/14/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-11 ta' Marzu 2002 li tistabbilixxi qafas ġenerali dwar l-informazzjoni u l-konsultazzjoni tal-impjegati fil-Komunità Ewropea (ĠU L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29).
(39) Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29).
(40) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2019/790 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta' April 2019 dwar id-drittijiet tal-awtur u drittijiet relatati fis-Suq Uniku Diġitali u li temenda d-Direttivi 96/9/KE u 2001/29/KE (ĠU L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 92.).
(40) Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 92).
(41) Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-25 ta' Ottubru 2012 dwar l-istandardizzazzjoni Ewropea, li jemenda d-Direttivi tal-Kunsill 89/686/KEE u 93/15/KEE u d-Direttivi 94/9/KE, 94/25/KE, 95/16/KE, 97/23/KE, 98/34/KE, 2004/22/KE, 2007/23/KE, 2009/23/KE u 2009/105/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u li jħassar id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 87/95/KEE u d-Deċiżjoni Nru 1673/2006/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (ĠU L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12).
(41) Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12).
(42) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2022/868 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-30 ta' Mejju 2022 dwar il-governanza Ewropea tad-data u li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) 2018/1724 (Att dwar il-Governanza tad-Data) (ĠU L 152, 3.6.2022, p. 1).
(42) Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on European data governance and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Data Governance Act) (OJ L 152, 3.6.2022, p. 1).
(43) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2023/2854 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-13 ta' Diċembru 2023 dwar regoli armonizzati dwar l-aċċess ġust għad-data u l-użu tagħha u li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) 2017/2394 u d-Direttiva (UE) 2020/1828 (l-Att dwar id-Data) (ĠU L, 2023/2854, 22.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2854/oj).
(43) Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2023 on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 (Data Act) (OJ L, 2023/2854, 22.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2854/oj).
(44) Ir-Rakkomandazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni tas-6 ta' Mejju 2003 dwar id-definizzjoni ta' intrapriżi mikro, żgħar u ta' daqs medju (ĠU L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
(44) Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
(45) Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni tal-24.1.2024 li tistabbilixxi l-Uffiċċju Ewropew għall-Intelliġenza Artifiċjali C(2024) 390.
(45) Commission Decision of 24.1.2024 establishing the European Artificial Intelligence Office C(2024) 390.
(46) Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 575/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Ġunju 2013 dwar ir-rekwiżiti prudenzjali għall-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu u d-ditti tal-investiment u li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) Nru 648/2012 (ĠU L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
(46) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
(47) Id-Direttiva 2008/48/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u-tal Kunsill tas-23 ta' April 2008 dwar ftehim ta' kreditu għall-konsumatur u li tħassar id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 87/102/KEE (ĠU L 133, 22.5.2008, p. 66).
(47) Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ L 133, 22.5.2008, p. 66).
(48) Id-Direttiva 2009/138/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-25 ta' Novembru 2009 dwar il-bidu u l-eżerċizzju tan-negozju tal-Assigurazzjoni u tar-Riassigurazzjoni (Solvibbiltà II) (ĠU L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1).
(48) Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1).
(49) Id-Direttiva 2013/36/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Ġunju 2013 dwar l-aċċess għall-attività tal-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu u s-superviżjoni prudenzjali tal-istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu u tad-ditti tal-investiment, li temenda d-Direttiva 2002/87/KE u li tħassar id-Direttivi 2006/48/KE u 2006/49/KE (ĠU L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338).
(49) Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338).
(50) Id-Direttiva 2014/17/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-4 ta' Frar 2014 dwar kuntratti ta' kreditu għall-konsumaturi marbutin ma' proprjetà immobbli residenzjali u li temenda d-Direttivi 2008/48/KE u 2013/36/UE u r-Regolament (UE) Nru 1093/2010 (ĠU L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34).
(50) Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34).
(51) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/97 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-20 ta' Jannar 2016 dwar id-distribuzzjoni tal-assigurazzjoni (ĠU L 26, 2.2.2016, p. 19).
(51) Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution (OJ L 26, 2.2.2016, p. 19).
(52) Ir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (UE) Nru 1024/2013 tal-15 ta' Ottubru 2013 li jikkonferixxi kompiti speċifiċi lill-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew fir-rigward ta' politiki relatati mas-superviżjoni prudenzjali ta' istituzzjonijiet ta' kreditu (ĠU L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 63).
(52) Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 63).
(53) Ir-Regolament (UE) 2023/988 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-10 ta' Mejju 2023 dwar is-sikurezza ġenerali tal-prodotti, li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) Nru 1025/2012 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u d-Direttiva (UE) 2020/1828 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, u li jħassar id-Direttiva 2001/95/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u d-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 87/357/KEE (ĠU L 135, 23.5.2023, p. 1).
(53) Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 on general product safety, amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and the Council, and repealing Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 87/357/EEC (OJ L 135, 23.5.2023, p. 1).
(54) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2019/1937 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-23 ta' Ottubru 2019 dwar il-protezzjoni ta' persuni li jirrapportaw dwar ksur tal-liġi tal-Unjoni (ĠU L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17).
(54) Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17).
(55) ĠU L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
(55) OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
(56) Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 182/2011 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-16 ta' Frar 2011 li jistabbilixxi r-regoli u l-prinċipji ġenerali dwar il-modalitajiet ta' kontroll mill-Istati Membri tal-eżerċizzju mill-Kummissjoni tas-setgħat ta' implimentazzjoni (ĠU L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
(56) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
(57) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/943 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-8 ta' Ġunju 2016 dwar il-protezzjoni ta' konoxxenza u ta' informazzjoni kummerċjali kunfidenzjali (sigrieti kummerċjali) kontra l-ksib, l-użu u l-iżvelar illegali tagħhom (ĠU L 157, 15.6.2016, p. 1).
(57) Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (OJ L 157, 15.6.2016, p. 1).
(58) Id-Direttiva (UE) 2020/1828 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-25 ta' Novembru 2020 dwar azzjonijiet rappreżentattivi għall-protezzjoni tal-interessi kollettivi tal-konsumaturi, u li tħassar id-Direttiva 2009/22/KE (ĠU L 409, 4.12.2020, p. 1).
(58) Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers and repealing Directive 2009/22/EC (OJ L 409, 4.12.2020, p. 1).
ANNESS I
ANNEX I
Lista ta' leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni
List of Union harmonisation legislation
Taqsima A. Lista ta' leġiżlazzjoni tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni bbażata fuq il-Qafas Leġiżlattiv Ġdid
Section A. List of Union harmonisation legislation based on the New Legislative Framework
1.
Id-Direttiva 2006/42/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta' Mejju 2006 dwar il-makkinarju, u li temenda d-Direttiva 95/16/KE (ĠU L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24);
1.
Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24);
2.
Id-Direttiva 2009/48/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-18 ta' Ġunju 2009 dwar is-sikurezza tal-ġugarelli (ĠU L 170, 30.6.2009, p. 1);
2.
Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (OJ L 170, 30.6.2009, p. 1);
3.
Id-Direttiva 2013/53/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-20 ta' Novembru 2013 dwar id-dgħajjes li jintużaw għar-rikreazzjoni u l-inġenji tal-ilma personali u li tħassar id-Direttiva 94/25/KE (ĠU L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 90);
3.
Directive 2013/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on recreational craft and personal watercraft and repealing Directive 94/25/EC (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 90);
4.
Id-Direttiva 2014/33/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Frar 2014 dwar l-armonizzazzjoni tal-liġijiet tal-Istati Membri relattivament għal liftijiet u komponenti ta' sikurezza għal-liftijiet (ĠU L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 251);
4.
Directive 2014/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to lifts and safety components for lifts (OJ L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 251);
5.
Id-Direttiva 2014/34/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-26 ta' Frar 2014 dwar l-armonizzazzjoni tal-liġijiet tal-Istati Membri relattivament għal tagħmir u sistemi ta' protezzjoni maħsuba għall-użu f'atmosferi potenzjalment splussivi (ĠU L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 309);
5.
Directive 2014/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (OJ L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 309);
6.
Id-Direttiva 2014/53/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-16 ta' April 2014 dwar l-armonizzazzjoni tal-liġijiet tal-Istati Membri marbuta mat-tqegħid fis-suq ta' tagħmir tar-radju u li tħassar id-Direttiva 1999/5/KE (ĠU L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62);
6.
Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC (OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62);
7.
Id-Direttiva 2014/68/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-15 ta' Mejju 2014 dwar l-armonizzazzjoni tal-liġijiet tal-Istati Membri relatati mat-tqegħid fis-suq ta' apparat ta' pressjoni (ĠU L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 164);
7.
Directive 2014/68/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 164);
8.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/424 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tad-9 ta' Marzu 2016 dwar l-installazzjonijiet tal-funikular u li jħassar id-Direttiva 2000/9/KE (ĠU L 81, 31.3.2016, p. 1);
8.
Regulation (EU) 2016/424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on cableway installations and repealing Directive 2000/9/EC (OJ L 81, 31.3.2016, p. 1);
9.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/425 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tad-9 ta' Marzu 2016 dwar tagħmir ta' protezzjoni personali u li jħassar id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 89/686/KEE (ĠU L 81, 31.3.2016, p. 51);
9.
Regulation (EU) 2016/425 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on personal protective equipment and repealing Council Directive 89/686/EEC (OJ L 81, 31.3.2016, p. 51);
10.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/426 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tad-9 ta' Marzu 2016 dwar tagħmir li jaħraq karburanti gassużi u li jħassar id-Direttiva 2009/142/KE (ĠU L 81, 31.3.2016, p. 99);
10.
Regulation (EU) 2016/426 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on appliances burning gaseous fuels and repealing Directive 2009/142/EC (OJ L 81, 31.3.2016, p. 99);
11.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2017/745 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' April 2017 dwar apparati mediċi, li jemenda d-Direttiva 2001/83/KE, ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 178/2002 u r-Regolament (KE) Nru 1223/2009 u li jħassar id-Direttivi tal-Kunsill 90/385/KEE u 93/42/KEE (ĠU L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1);
11.
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1);
12.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2017/746 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' April 2017 dwar apparati mediċi dijanjostiċi in vitro u li jħassar id-Direttiva 98/79/KE u d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2010/227/UE (ĠU L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 176).
12.
Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 176).
Taqsima B. Lista ta' leġiżlazzjoni oħra tal-Unjoni dwar l-armonizzazzjoni
Section B. List of other Union harmonisation legislation
13.
Ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 300/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-11 ta' Marzu 2008 dwar regoli komuni fil-qasam tas-sigurtà tal-avjazzjoni ċivili u li jħassar ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 2320/2002 (ĠU L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 72);
13.
Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 (OJ L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 72);
14.
Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 168/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-15 ta' Jannar 2013 dwar l-approvazzjoni u s-sorveljanza tas-suq ta' vetturi b'żewġ jew tliet roti u kwadriċikli (ĠU L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 52);
14.
Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 on the approval and market surveillance of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (OJ L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 52);
15.
Ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 167/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' Frar 2013 dwar l-approvazzjoni u s-sorveljanza tas-suq ta' vetturi għall-agrikoltura u għall-forestrija (ĠU L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 1);
15.
Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 February 2013 on the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (OJ L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 1);
16.
Id-Direttiva 2014/90/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-23 ta' Lulju 2014 dwar tagħmir tal-baħar u li tħassar id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 96/98/KE (ĠU L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146);
16.
Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council Directive 96/98/EC (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146);
17.
Id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/797 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-11 ta' Mejju 2016 dwar l-interoperabbiltà tas-sistema ferrovjarja fl-Unjoni Ewropea (ĠU L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44);
17.
Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (OJ L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44);
18.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/858 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-30 ta' Mejju 2018 dwar l-approvazzjoni u s-sorveljanza tas-suq ta' vetturi bil-mutur u t-trejlers tagħhom, u ta' sistemi, komponenti u unitajiet tekniċi separati maħsuba għal tali vetturi, li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 715/2007 u (KE) Nru 595/2009 u li jħassar id-Direttiva 2007/46/KE (ĠU L 151, 14.6.2018, p. 1);
18.
Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2007 and (EC) No 595/2009 and repealing Directive 2007/46/EC (OJ L 151, 14.6.2018, p. 1);
19.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/2144 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-27 ta' Novembru 2019 dwar rekwiżiti tal-approvazzjoni tat-tip għall-vetturi bil-mutur u t-trejlers tagħhom, kif ukoll sistemi, komponenti u unitajiet tekniċi separati maħsubin għat-tali vetturi, fir-rigward tas-sikurezza ġenerali tagħhom u tal-protezzjoni tal-okkupanti tal-vetturi u l-utenti vulnerabbli tat-triq, li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) 2018/858 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u li jħassar ir-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 78/2009, (KE) Nru 79/2009 u (KE) Nru 661/2009 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u tar-Regolamenti tal-Kummissjoni (KE) Nru 631/2009, (UE) Nru 406/2010, (UE) Nru 672/2010, (UE) Nru 1003/2010, (UE) Nru 1005/2010, (UE) Nru 1008/2010, (UE) Nru 1009/2010, (UE) Nru 19/2011, (UE) Nru 109/2011, (UE) Nru 458/2011, (UE) Nru 65/2012, (UE) Nru 130/2012, (UE) Nru 347/2012, (UE) Nru 351/2012, (UE) Nru 1230/2012 u (UE) 2015/166 (ĠU L 325, 16.12.2019, p. 1);
19.
Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on type-approval requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, as regards their general safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users, amending Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulations (EC) No 78/2009, (EC) No 79/2009 and (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 631/2009, (EU) No 406/2010, (EU) No 672/2010, (EU) No 1003/2010, (EU) No 1005/2010, (EU) No 1008/2010, (EU) No 1009/2010, (EU) No 19/2011, (EU) No 109/2011, (EU) No 458/2011, (EU) No 65/2012, (EU) No 130/2012, (EU) No 347/2012, (EU) No 351/2012, (EU) No 1230/2012 and (EU) 2015/166 (OJ L 325, 16.12.2019, p. 1);
20.
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1139 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-4 ta' Lulju 2018 dwar regoli komuni fil-qasam tal-avjazzjoni ċivili u li jistabbilixxi Aġenzija tas-Sikurezza tal-Avjazzjoni tal-Unjoni Ewropea, u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 2111/2005, (KE) Nru 1008/2008, (UE) Nru 996/2010, (UE) Nru 376/2014 u d-Direttivi 2014/30/UE u 2014/53/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill, u li jħassar ir-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 552/2004 u (KE) Nru 216/2008 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u r-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KEE) Nru 3922/91 (ĠU L 212, 22.8.2018, p. 1), sa fejn jirrigwarda t-tfassil, il-produzzjoni u l-introduzzjoni fis-suq tal-inġenji tal-ajru msemmija fl-Artikolu 2(1), il-punti (a) u (b) tiegħu, f'dak li jikkonċerna l-inġenji tal-ajru mingħajr bdot abbord u l-magni, l-iskrejjen, il-parts u t-tagħmir tagħhom għall-kontroll mill-bogħod.
20.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and amending Regulations (EC) No 2111/2005, (EC) No 1008/2008, (EU) No 996/2010, (EU) No 376/2014 and Directives 2014/30/EU and 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 552/2004 and (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (OJ L 212, 22.8.2018, p. 1), in so far as the design, production and placing on the market of aircrafts referred to in Article 2(1), points (a) and (b) thereof, where it concerns unmanned aircraft and their engines, propellers, parts and equipment to control them remotely, are concerned.
ANNESS II
ANNEX II
Lista ta' reati kriminali msemmija fl-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h)(iii)
List of criminal offences referred to in Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (h)(iii)
Reati kriminali msemmija fl-Artikolu 5(1), l-ewwel subparagrafu, il-punt (h)(iii):
Criminal offences referred to in Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (h)(iii):
terroriżmu,
terrorism,
traffikar tal-bnedmin,
trafficking in human beings,
sfruttament sesswali tat-tfal u pornografija tat-tfal,
sexual exploitation of children, and child pornography,
traffikar illeċitu ta' drogi narkotiċi jew sustanzi psikotropiċi,
illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances,
traffikar illeċitu ta' armi, munizzjon jew splussivi,
illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions or explosives,
qtil, offiżi gravi fuq il-persuna,
murder, grievous bodily injury,
kummerċ illeċitu ta' organi jew tessuti tal-bniedem,
illicit trade in human organs or tissue,
traffikar illeċitu ta' materjali nukleari jew radjoattivi,
illicit trafficking in nuclear or radioactive materials,
ħtif ta' persuni, żamma illegali jew teħid ta' ostaġġi,
kidnapping, illegal restraint or hostage-taking,
reati li jaqgħu fil-ġuriżdizzjoni tal-Qorti Kriminali Internazzjonali,
crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court,
ħtif illegali ta' inġenji tal-ajru jew bastimenti,
unlawful seizure of aircraft or ships,
stupru,
rape,
reati ambjentali,
environmental crime,
serq organizzat jew bl-użu ta' armi,
organised or armed robbery,
sabotaġġ,
sabotage,
– parteċipazzjoni f'organizzazzjoni kriminali involuta f'reat wieħed jew aktar minn dawk elenkati hawn fuq.
participation in a criminal organisation involved in one or more of the offences listed above.
ANNESS III
ANNEX III
Sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli msemmija fl-Artikolu 6(2)
High-risk AI systems referred to in Article 6(2)
Sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli skont l-Artikolu 6(2) huma s-sistemi tal-IA elenkati f'xi wieħed minn dawn l-oqsma li ġejjin:
High-risk AI systems pursuant to Article 6(2) are the AI systems listed in any of the following areas:
1.
Bijometrika, sa fejn l-użu tagħhom ikun permess skont id-dritt rilevanti tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali:
1.
Biometrics, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:
(a)
sistemi ta’ identifikazzjoni bijometrika remota.
(a)
remote biometric identification systems.
Dan ma għandux jinkludi sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-verifika bijometrika li l-uniku skop tagħhom huwa li jikkonfermaw li persuna fiżika speċifika tkun il-persuna li hija tiddikjara li tkun;
This shall not include AI systems intended to be used for biometric verification the sole purpose of which is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għall-kategorizzazzjoni bijometrika, skont attributi jew karatteristiċi sensittivi jew protetti abbażi tal-inferenza ta' dawk l-attributi jew il-karatteristiċi;
(b)
AI systems intended to be used for biometric categorisation, according to sensitive or protected attributes or characteristics based on the inference of those attributes or characteristics;
(c)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw għar-rikonoxximent tal-emozzjonijiet.
(c)
AI systems intended to be used for emotion recognition.
2.
Infrastruttura kritika: Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw bħala komponenti tas-sikurezza fil-ġestjoni u t-tħaddim tal-infrastruttura diġitali kritika, tat-traffiku fit-toroq, jew fil-provvista tal-ilma, il-gass, it-tisħin jew l-elettriku.
2.
Critical infrastructure: AI systems intended to be used as safety components in the management and operation of critical digital infrastructure, road traffic, or in the supply of water, gas, heating or electricity.
3.
Edukazzjoni u taħriġ vokazzjonali:
3.
Education and vocational training:
(a)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jiddeterminaw l-aċċess jew l-ammissjoni jew biex jassenjaw persuni fiżiċi lil istituzzjonijiet tal-edukazzjoni u tat-taħriġ vokazzjonali fil-livelli kollha;
(a)
AI systems intended to be used to determine access or admission or to assign natural persons to educational and vocational training institutions at all levels;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jevalwaw l-eżiti tal-apprendiment, inkluż meta dawk l-eżiti jintużaw biex jidderieġu l-proċess tal-apprendiment tal-persuni fiżiċi f'istituzzjonijiet tal-edukazzjoni u tat-taħriġ vokazzjonali fil-livelli kollha;
(b)
AI systems intended to be used to evaluate learning outcomes, including when those outcomes are used to steer the learning process of natural persons in educational and vocational training institutions at all levels;
(c)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw bl-għan li jivvalutaw il-livell xieraq ta' edukazzjoni li l-individwu ser jirċievi jew ser ikun jista' jaċċessa, fil-kuntest tal-istituzzjonijiet tal-edukazzjoni u tat-taħriġ vokazzjonali jew fi ħdanhom fil-livelli kollha;
(c)
AI systems intended to be used for the purpose of assessing the appropriate level of education that an individual will receive or will be able to access, in the context of or within educational and vocational training institutions at all levels;
(d)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jimmonitorjaw jew jikxfu mġiba pprojbita tal-istudenti waqt it-testijiet fil-kuntest tal-istituzzjonijiet tal-edukazzjoni u tat-taħriġ vokazzjonali jew fi ħdanhom fil-livelli kollha.
(d)
AI systems intended to be used for monitoring and detecting prohibited behaviour of students during tests in the context of or within educational and vocational training institutions at all levels.
4.
Impjiegi, ġestjoni tal-ħaddiema u aċċess għal impjiegi indipendenti:
4.
Employment, workers’ management and access to self-employment:
(a)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jirreklutaw jew jagħżlu l-persuni fiżiċi, b'mod partikolari biex isiru avviżi ta' impjieg immirati, biex jiġu analizzati u ffiltrati l-applikazzjonijiet għal impjieg, u biex jiġu evalwati l-kandidati;
(a)
AI systems intended to be used for the recruitment or selection of natural persons, in particular to place targeted job advertisements, to analyse and filter job applications, and to evaluate candidates;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jittieħdu deċiżjonijiet li jaffettwaw it-termini tar-relazzjonijiet relatati max-xogħol, il-promozzjoni jew it-terminazzjoni ta' relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali relatati max-xogħol, biex jallokaw kompiti abbażi tal-mġiba individwali jew il-karatteristiċi personali jew biex jimmonitorjaw u jevalwaw il-prestazzjoni u l-imġiba tal-persuni f'dawn ir-relazzjonijiet.
(b)
AI systems intended to be used to make decisions affecting terms of work-related relationships, the promotion or termination of work-related contractual relationships, to allocate tasks based on individual behaviour or personal traits or characteristics or to monitor and evaluate the performance and behaviour of persons in such relationships.
5.
Aċċess għal servizzi privati essenzjali u għal servizzi u benefiċċji pubbliċi essenzjali u t-tgawdija tagħhom:
5.
Access to and enjoyment of essential private services and essential public services and benefits:
(a)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi jew f'isem l-awtoritajiet pubbliċi biex jevalwaw l-eliġibbiltà tal-persuni fiżiċi għal benefiċċji u servizzi ta' assistenza pubblika essenzjali, inkluż servizzi tal-kura tas-saħħa, kif ukoll biex jagħtu, inaqqsu, jirrevokaw, jew jitolbu mill-ġdid dawn il-benefiċċji u s-servizzi;
(a)
AI systems intended to be used by public authorities or on behalf of public authorities to evaluate the eligibility of natural persons for essential public assistance benefits and services, including healthcare services, as well as to grant, reduce, revoke, or reclaim such benefits and services;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jevalwaw l-affidabbiltà kreditizja tal-persuni fiżiċi jew biex jistabbilixxu l-punteġġ tal-kreditu tagħhom, bl-eċċezzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA użati bl-għan li tinkixef frodi finanzjarja;
(b)
AI systems intended to be used to evaluate the creditworthiness of natural persons or establish their credit score, with the exception of AI systems used for the purpose of detecting financial fraud;
(c)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jiġi vvalutat u pprezzat ir-riskju fir-rigward tal-persuni fiżiċi fil-każ ta' assigurazzjoni tal-ħajja u tas-saħħa;
(c)
AI systems intended to be used for risk assessment and pricing in relation to natural persons in the case of life and health insurance;
(d)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jevalwaw u jikklassifikaw it-telefonati ta' emerġenza minn persuni fiżiċi jew biex jintużaw għad-dispaċċ, jew biex tiġi stabbilita prijorità fid-dispaċċ ta' servizzi tal-ewwel rispons ta' emerġenza, inkluż mill-pulizija, minn ħaddiema tat-tifi tan-nar u tal-għajnuna medika, kif ukoll minn sistemi ta' triage tal-pazjenti tal-kura tas-saħħa ta' emerġenza;
(d)
AI systems intended to evaluate and classify emergency calls by natural persons or to be used to dispatch, or to establish priority in the dispatching of, emergency first response services, including by police, firefighters and medical aid, as well as of emergency healthcare patient triage systems.
6.
Infurzar tal-liġi, sa fejn l-użu tagħhom ikun permess skont id-dritt rilevanti tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali:
6.
Law enforcement, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:
(a)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom, jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni b'appoġġ għall-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom biex jivvalutaw ir-riskjuli persuna fiżika tisfa vittma ta' reati kriminali;
(a)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities or on their behalf to assess the risk of a natural person becoming the victim of criminal offences;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni b'appoġġ għall-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi bħala poligrafi jew għodod simili;
(b)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities as polygraphs or similar tools;
(c)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom, jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni b'appoġġ għall-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi biex jevalwaw l-affidabbiltà tal-evidenza waqt l-investigazzjoni jew prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali;
(c)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, in support of law enforcement authorities to evaluate the reliability of evidence in the course of the investigation or prosecution of criminal offences;
(d)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni b'appoġġ għall-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi biex jivvalutaw ir-riskju li persuna fiżika twettaq jew terġa' twettaq reat mhux biss abbażi tat-tfassil tal-profil tal-persuni fiżiċi kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 3(4) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680, jew biex jivvalutaw il-karatteristiċi tal-personalità jew l-imġiba kriminali tal-passat ta' persuni fiżiċi jew ta' gruppi;
(d)
AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities or on their behalf or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for assessing the risk of a natural person offending or re-offending not solely on the basis of the profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680, or to assess personality traits and characteristics or past criminal behaviour of natural persons or groups;
(e)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew f'isimhom jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni b'appoġġ għall-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi għat-tfassil tal-profil ta' persuni fiżiċi kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 3(4) tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 waqt il-kxif, l-investigazzjoni jew il-prosekuzzjoni ta' reati kriminali.
(e)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of law enforcement authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies in support of law enforcement authorities for the profiling of natural persons as referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 in the course of the detection, investigation or prosecution of criminal offences.
7.
Ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-kontroll fuq il-fruntieri, sa fejn l-użu tagħhom ikun permess skont id-dritt rilevanti tal-Unjoni jew nazzjonali:
7.
Migration, asylum and border control management, in so far as their use is permitted under relevant Union or national law:
(a)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti jew f’isimhom, jew minn istituzzjonijiet tal-Unjoni, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji bħala poligrafi jew għodod simili;
(a)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies as polygraphs or similar tools;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti jew f'isimhom jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni biex jivvalutaw riskju, inkluż riskju għas-sigurtà, riskju ta' migrazzjoni irregolari, jew riskju għas-saħħa, maħluq minn persuna fiżika li jkun biħsiebha tidħol jew li tkun daħlet fit-territorju ta' Stat Membru;
(b)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to assess a risk, including a security risk, a risk of irregular migration, or a health risk, posed by a natural person who intends to enter or who has entered into the territory of a Member State;
(c)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti jew f'isimhom jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni biex jassistu lill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti għall-eżami ta' applikazzjonijiet għall-ażil, viżi jew permessi ta' residenza u għall-ilmenti assoċjati fir-rigward tal-eliġibbiltà tal-persuni fiżiċi li japplikaw għal status, inkluż valutazzjonijiet relatati tal-affidabbiltà tal-evidenza;
(c)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies to assist competent public authorities for the examination of applications for asylum, visa or residence permits and for associated complaints with regard to the eligibility of the natural persons applying for a status, including related assessments of the reliability of evidence;
(d)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw mill-awtoritajiet pubbliċi kompetenti jew f'isimhom, jew minn istituzzjonijiet, korpi, uffiċċji jew aġenziji tal-Unjoni, fil-kuntest tal-ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, l-ażil jew il-kontroll fuq il-fruntieri, għall-fini tal-kxif, ir-rikonoxximent jew l-identifikazzjoni tal-persuni fiżiċi, bl-eċċezzjoni tal-verifika ta' dokumenti tal-ivvjaġġar.
(d)
AI systems intended to be used by or on behalf of competent public authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, in the context of migration, asylum or border control management, for the purpose of detecting, recognising or identifying natural persons, with the exception of the verification of travel documents.
8.
Amministrazzjoni tal-ġustizzja u proċessi demokratiċi:
8.
Administration of justice and democratic processes:
(a)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw minn awtorità ġudizzjarja jew f'isimha biex jassistu awtorità ġudizzjarja fir-riċerka u l-interpretazzjoni ta' fatti u tal-liġi u fl-applikazzjoni tal-liġi għal sett konkret ta' fatti, jew biex jintużaw b'mod simili f'soluzzjoni alternattiva għat-tilwim;
(a)
AI systems intended to be used by a judicial authority or on their behalf to assist a judicial authority in researching and interpreting facts and the law and in applying the law to a concrete set of facts, or to be used in a similar way in alternative dispute resolution;
(b)
Sistemi tal-IA maħsuba biex jintużaw biex jinfluwenzaw l-eżitu ta' elezzjoni jew referendum jew l-imġiba tal-votazzjoni tal-persuni fiżiċi fl-eżerċizzju tal-vot tagħhom f'elezzjonijiet jew referenda. Dan ma jinkludix sistemi tal-IA li persuni fiżiċi ma jkunux esposti direttament għall-output tagħhom, bħal għodod użati għall-organizzazzjoni, l-ottimizzazzjoni jew l-istrutturar ta' kampanji politiċi minn perspettiva amministrattiva jew loġistika.
(b)
AI systems intended to be used for influencing the outcome of an election or referendum or the voting behaviour of natural persons in the exercise of their vote in elections or referenda. This does not include AI systems to the output of which natural persons are not directly exposed, such as tools used to organise, optimise or structure political campaigns from an administrative or logistical point of view.
ANNESS IV
ANNEX IV
Dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 11(1)
Technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1)
Id-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 11(1) għandu jkun fiha mill-inqas l-informazzjoni li ġejja, kif applikabbli għas-sistema tal-IA rilevanti:
The technical documentation referred to in Article 11(1) shall contain at least the following information, as applicable to the relevant AI system:
1.
Deskrizzjoni ġenerali tas-sistema tal-IA li tinkludi:
1.
A general description of the AI system including:
(a)
l-għan maħsub, l-isem tal-fornitur u l-verżjoni tas-sistema li tirrifletti r-relazzjoni tagħha mal-verżjonijiet preċedenti;
(a)
its intended purpose, the name of the provider and the version of the system reflecting its relation to previous versions;
(b)
kif is-sistema tal-IA tinteraġixxi ma' jew tista' tintuża biex tinteraġixxi ma' hardware jew software, inkluż ma' sistemi oħra tal-IA, li ma jagħmlux parti mis-sistema tal-IA nnifisha, fejn applikabbli;
(b)
how the AI system interacts with, or can be used to interact with, hardware or software, including with other AI systems, that are not part of the AI system itself, where applicable;
(c)
il-verżjonijiet tas-software jew tal-firmware rilevanti, u kwalunkwe rekwiżit relatat mal-aġġornamenti tal-verżjoni;
(c)
the versions of relevant software or firmware, and any requirements related to version updates;
(d)
id-deskrizzjoni tal-forom kollha li fihom is-sistema tal-IA tiġi introdotta fis-suq jew imqiegħda fis-servizz, bħal pakketti ta' software inkorporati f'hardware; downloads jew APIs;
(d)
the description of all the forms in which the AI system is placed on the market or put into service, such as software packages embedded into hardware, downloads, or APIs;
(e)
id-deskrizzjoni tal-hardware li fuqu s-sistema tal-IA hi maħsuba li taħdem;
(e)
the description of the hardware on which the AI system is intended to run;
(f)
meta s-sistema tal-IA tkun komponent ta' prodotti, ritratti jew illustrazzjonijiet li juru karatteristiċi esterni, l-immarkar u t-tqassim intern ta' dawk il-prodotti;
(f)
where the AI system is a component of products, photographs or illustrations showing external features, the marking and internal layout of those products;
(g)
deskrizzjoni bażika tal-interfaċċa tal-utent ipprovduta lill-implimentatur;
(g)
a basic description of the user-interface provided to the deployer;
(h)
struzzjonijiet għall-użu għall-implimentatur u deskrizzjoni bażika tal-interfaċċa tal-utent ipprovduta lill-implimentatur, fejn applikabbli;
(h)
instructions for use for the deployer, and a basic description of the user-interface provided to the deployer, where applicable;
2.
Deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-elementi tas-sistema tal-IA u tal-proċess għall-iżvilupp tagħha, inkluż:
2.
A detailed description of the elements of the AI system and of the process for its development, including:
(a)
il-metodi u l-passi mwettqa għall-iżvilupp tas-sistema tal-IA, inkluż, meta rilevanti, ir-rikors għal sistemi jew għodod imħarrġa minn qabel ipprovduti minn partijiet terzi u kif dawk intużaw, ġew integrati jew modifikati mill-fornitur;
(a)
the methods and steps performed for the development of the AI system, including, where relevant, recourse to pre-trained systems or tools provided by third parties and how those were used, integrated or modified by the provider;
(b)
l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tad-disinn tas-sistema, jiġifieri l-loġika ġenerali tas-sistema tal-IA u tal-algoritmi; l-għażliet ewlenin tad-disinn, inkluż ir-raġunijiet u s-suppożizzjonijiet magħmula, inkluż fir-rigward ta' persuni jew gruppi ta' persuni li fir-rigward tagħhom, is-sistema hija maħsuba li tintuża fuqhom; l-għażliet ewlenin tal-klassifikazzjoni; dak li s-sistema tfasslet biex tottimizza u r-rilevanza tal-parametri differenti; id-deskrizzjoni tal-output mistenni u tal-kwalità tal-output tas-sistema; id-deċiżjonijiet dwar kwalunkwe kompromess possibbli li jkun sar rigward is-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi adottati għal konformità mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2;
(b)
the design specifications of the system, namely the general logic of the AI system and of the algorithms; the key design choices including the rationale and assumptions made, including with regard to persons or groups of persons in respect of who, the system is intended to be used; the main classification choices; what the system is designed to optimise for, and the relevance of the different parameters; the description of the expected output and output quality of the system; the decisions about any possible trade-off made regarding the technical solutions adopted to comply with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2;
(c)
id-deskrizzjoni tal-arkitettura tas-sistema li tispjega kif il-komponenti tas-software jibnu fuq jew jikkontribwixxu għal xulxin u jintegraw fl-ipproċessar ġenerali; ir-riżorsi komputazzjonali użati għall-iżvilupp, it-taħriġ, l-ittestjar u l-validazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA;
(c)
the description of the system architecture explaining how software components build on or feed into each other and integrate into the overall processing; the computational resources used to develop, train, test and validate the AI system;
(d)
meta rilevanti, ir-rekwiżiti tad-data mil-lat ta' skedi tad-data li jiddeskrivu l-metodoloġiji u t-tekniki tat-taħriġ u s-settijiet tad-data għat-taħriġ użati, inkluż deskrizzjoni ġenerali ta' dawn is-settijiet tad-data, informazzjoni dwar il-provenjenza tagħhom, il-kamp ta' applikazzjoni u l-karatteristiċi ewlenin tagħhom; kif inkisbet u ntgħażlet id-data; proċeduri tat-tikkettar (eż. għal tagħlim sorveljat), metodoloġiji għat-tindif tad-data (eż. kxif ta' anomaliji);
(d)
where relevant, the data requirements in terms of datasheets describing the training methodologies and techniques and the training data sets used, including a general description of these data sets, information about their provenance, scope and main characteristics; how the data was obtained and selected; labelling procedures (e.g. for supervised learning), data cleaning methodologies (e.g. outliers detection);
(e)
valutazzjoni tal-miżuri ta' sorveljanza mill-bniedem meħtieġa f'konformità mal-Artikolu 14, inkluż valutazzjoni tal-miżuri tekniċi meħtieġa biex tiġi ffaċilitata l-interpretazzjoni tal-outputs tas-sistemi tal-IA mill-implimentaturi, f'konformità mal-Artikolu 13(3), il-punt (d);
(e)
assessment of the human oversight measures needed in accordance with Article 14, including an assessment of the technical measures needed to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the deployers, in accordance with Article 13(3), point (d);
(f)
meta applikabbli, deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-bidliet predeterminati għas-sistema tal-IA u l-prestazzjoni tagħha, flimkien mal-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha relatata mas-soluzzjonijiet tekniċi adottati biex tkun żgurata l-konformità kontinwa tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti rilevanti stipulati fit-Kapitolu III, Taqsima 2;
(f)
where applicable, a detailed description of pre-determined changes to the AI system and its performance, together with all the relevant information related to the technical solutions adopted to ensure continuous compliance of the AI system with the relevant requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2;
(g)
il-proċeduri ta' validazzjoni u ttestjar użati, inkluż informazzjoni dwar il-validazzjoni u d-data tal-ittestjar użati u l-karatteristiċi ewlenin tagħhom; il-metrika użata biex jitkejlu l-akkuratezza, ir-robustezza u l-konformità mar-rekwiżiti rilevanti oħra stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, kif ukoll impatti potenzjalment diskriminatorji; ir-reġistri tat-testijiet u r-rapporti tat-testijiet kollha datati u ffirmati mill-persuni responsabbli, inkluż rigward il-bidliet predeterminati msemmija fil-punt (f);
(g)
the validation and testing procedures used, including information about the validation and testing data used and their main characteristics; metrics used to measure accuracy, robustness and compliance with other relevant requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, as well as potentially discriminatory impacts; test logs and all test reports dated and signed by the responsible persons, including with regard to pre-determined changes as referred to under point (f);
(h)
il-miżuri taċ-ċibersigurtà stabbiliti;
(h)
cybersecurity measures put in place;
3.
Informazzjoni dettaljata dwar il-monitoraġġ, il-funzjonament u l-kontroll tas-sistema tal-IA, b'mod partikolari fir-rigward ta': il-kapaċitajiet u l-limitazzjonijiet tagħha fil-prestazzjoni, inkluż il-gradi ta' akkuratezza għal persuni jew gruppi ta' persuni speċifiċi li fir-rigward tagħhom hi maħsuba li tintuża s-sistema, u l-livell ġenerali mistenni ta' akkuratezza fir-rigward tal-għan maħsub tagħha; l-eżiti mhux intenzjonati prevedibbli u s-sorsi tar-riskji għas-saħħa u s-sikurezza, id-drittijiet fundamentali u d-diskriminazzjoni fid-dawl tal-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA; il-miżuri ta' sorveljanza umana meħtieġa f'konformità mal-Artikolu 14, inkluż il-miżuri tekniċi stabbiliti biex tiġi ffaċilitata l-interpretazzjoni tal-outputs tas-sistemi tal-IA mill-implimentaturi; speċifikazzjonijiet dwar id-data tal-input, kif xieraq;
3.
Detailed information about the monitoring, functioning and control of the AI system, in particular with regard to: its capabilities and limitations in performance, including the degrees of accuracy for specific persons or groups of persons on which the system is intended to be used and the overall expected level of accuracy in relation to its intended purpose; the foreseeable unintended outcomes and sources of risks to health and safety, fundamental rights and discrimination in view of the intended purpose of the AI system; the human oversight measures needed in accordance with Article 14, including the technical measures put in place to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the deployers; specifications on input data, as appropriate;
4.
Deskrizzjoni tal-adegwatezza tal-metrika tal-prestazzjoni għas-sistema speċifika tal-IA;
4.
A description of the appropriateness of the performance metrics for the specific AI system;
5.
Deskrizzjoni dettaljata tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tar-riskju f'konformità mal-Artikolu 9;
5.
A detailed description of the risk management system in accordance with Article 9;
6.
Deskrizzjoni tal-bidliet rilevanti li saru mill-fornitur fis-sistema tul iċ-ċiklu ta' ħajjitha;
6.
A description of relevant changes made by the provider to the system through its lifecycle;
7.
Lista tal-istandards armonizzati applikati għalkollox jew parzjalment li r-referenzi tagħhom ġew ippubblikati f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea; meta ma jkun ġie applikat l-ebda standard armonizzat bħal dan, deskrizzjoni dettaljata tas-soluzzjonijiet adottati biex jiġu ssodisfati r-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, inkluż lista ta' standards u speċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi rilevanti oħra applikati;
7.
A list of the harmonised standards applied in full or in part the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union; where no such harmonised standards have been applied, a detailed description of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, including a list of other relevant standards and technical specifications applied;
8.
Kopja tad-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47;
8.
A copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;
9.
Deskrizzjoni dettaljata tas-sistema fis-seħħ biex tiġi evalwata l-prestazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA fil-fażi ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq f'konformità mal-Artikolu 72, inkluż il-pjan ta' sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq imsemmi fl-Artikolu 72(3).
9.
A detailed description of the system in place to evaluate the AI system performance in the post-market phase in accordance with Article 72, including the post-market monitoring plan referred to in Article 72(3).
ANNESS V
ANNEX V
Dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE
EU declaration of conformity
Id-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 għandu jkun fiha l-informazzjoni kollha li ġejja:
The EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47, shall contain all of the following information:
1.
L-isem u t-tip tas-sistema tal-IA u kwalunkwe referenza mhux ambigwa addizzjonali li tippermetti l-identifikazzjoni u t-traċċabbiltà tas-sistema tal-IA;
1.
AI system name and type and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;
2.
L-isem u l-indirizz tal-fornitur jew, meta applikabbli, tar-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu;
2.
The name and address of the provider or, where applicable, of their authorised representative;
3.
Stqarrija li d-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47 qed tinħareġ taħt ir-responsabbiltà unika tal-fornitur;
3.
A statement that the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 is issued under the sole responsibility of the provider;
4.
Stqarrija li s-sistema tal-IA tikkonforma ma' dan ir-Regolament u, jekk applikabbli, ma' kwalunkwe liġi rilevanti oħra tal-Unjoni li tipprevedi l-ħruġ tad-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47;
4.
A statement that the AI system is in conformity with this Regulation and, if applicable, with any other relevant Union law that provides for the issuing of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;
5.
Meta sistema tal-IA tinvolvi l-ipproċessar ta' data personali, dikjarazzjoni li dik is-sistema tal-IA tikkonforma mar-Regolamenti (UE) 2016/679 u (UE) 2018/1725 u mad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680;
5.
Where an AI system involves the processing of personal data, a statement that that AI system complies with Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) 2018/1725 and Directive (EU) 2016/680;
6.
Referenzi għal kwalunkwe standard armonizzat rilevanti użat jew kwalunkwe speċifikazzjoni komuni oħra li fir-rigward tagħha tiġi ddikjarata konformità;
6.
References to any relevant harmonised standards used or any other common specification in relation to which conformity is declared;
7.
Meta applikabbli, l-isem u n-numru ta' identifikazzjoni tal-korp notifikat, deskrizzjoni tal-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità li saret, u identifikazzjoni taċ-ċertifikat maħruġa;
7.
Where applicable, the name and identification number of the notified body, a description of the conformity assessment procedure performed, and identification of the certificate issued;
8.
Il-post u d-data tal-ħruġ tad-dikjarazzjoni, l-isem u l-funzjoni tal-persuna li ffirmatha, kif ukoll indikazzjoni ta' għal min, jew f'isem min, iffirmat dik il-persuna, firma.
8.
The place and date of issue of the declaration, the name and function of the person who signed it, as well as an indication for, or on behalf of whom, that person signed, a signature.
ANNESS VI
ANNEX VI
Proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq kontroll intern
Conformity assessment procedure based on internal control
1.
1.
Il-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq kontroll intern hi l-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq il-punti 2, 3 u 4.
The conformity assessment procedure based on internal control is the conformity assessment procedure based on points 2, 3 and 4.
2.
2.
Il-fornitur jivverifika li s-sistema stabbilita ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità hija konformi mar-rekwiżiti tal-Artikolu 17.
The provider verifies that the established quality management system is in compliance with the requirements of Article 17.
3.
3.
Il-fornitur jeżamina l-informazzjoni fid-dokumentazzjoni teknika biex jivvaluta l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti essenzjali rilevanti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2.
The provider examines the information contained in the technical documentation in order to assess the compliance of the AI system with the relevant essential requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2.
4.
4.
Il-fornitur jivverifika wkoll li l-proċess tad-disinn u l-iżvilupp tas-sistema tal-IA u s-sorveljanza ta' wara t-tqegħid fis-suq tagħha kif imsemmi fl-Artikolu 72 huwa konsistenti mad-dokumentazzjoni teknika.
The provider also verifies that the design and development process of the AI system and its post-market monitoring as referred to in Article 72 is consistent with the technical documentation.
ANNESS VII
ANNEX VII
Konformità bbażata fuq valutazzjoni tas-sistema tal-ġestjoni tal-kwalità u valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika
Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation
1. Introduzzjoni
1. Introduction
Il-konformità bbażata fuq valutazzjoni tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità u fuq valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika hi l-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni tal-konformità bbażata fuq il-punti 2 sa 5.
Conformity based on an assessment of the quality management system and an assessment of the technical documentation is the conformity assessment procedure based on points 2 to 5.
2. Ħarsa ġenerali
2. Overview
Is-sistema approvata ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità għat-tfassil, l-iżvilupp u l-ittestjar tas-sistemi tal-IA skont l-Artikolu 17 għandha tiġi eżaminata f'konformità mal-punt 3 u għandha tkun soġġetta għal sorveljanza kif speċifikat fil-punt 5. Id-dokumentazzjoni teknika tas-sistema tal-IA għandha tiġi eżaminata skont il-punt 4.
The approved quality management system for the design, development and testing of AI systems pursuant to Article 17 shall be examined in accordance with point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 5. The technical documentation of the AI system shall be examined in accordance with point 4.
3. Sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità
3. Quality management system
3.1.
L-applikazzjoni tal-fornitur għandha tinkludi:
3.1.
The application of the provider shall include:
(a)
l-isem u l-indirizz tal-fornitur u, jekk l-applikazzjoni titressaq minn rappreżentant awtorizzat, l-isem u l-indirizz tiegħu wkoll;
(a)
the name and address of the provider and, if the application is lodged by an authorised representative, also their name and address;
(b)
il-lista tas-sistemi tal-IA koperti taħt l-istess sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità;
(b)
the list of AI systems covered under the same quality management system;
(c)
id-dokumentazzjoni teknika għal kull sistema tal-IA koperta taħt l-istess sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità;
(c)
the technical documentation for each AI system covered under the same quality management system;
(d)
id-dokumentazzjoni li tikkonċerna s-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità li għandha tkopri l-aspetti kollha elenkati taħt l-Artikolu 17;
(d)
the documentation concerning the quality management system which shall cover all the aspects listed under Article 17;
(e)
deskrizzjoni tal-proċeduri fis-seħħ biex ikun żgurat li s-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità tibqa' adegwata u effettiva;
(e)
a description of the procedures in place to ensure that the quality management system remains adequate and effective;
(f)
dikjarazzjoni bil-miktub li l-istess applikazzjoni ma ġiet ippreżentata lil ebda korp notifikat ieħor.
(f)
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body.
3.2.
Is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità għandha tiġi vvalutata mill-korp notifikat, li għandu jiddetermina jekk tissodisfax ir-rekwiżiti msemmija fl-Artikolu 17.
3.2.
The quality management system shall be assessed by the notified body, which shall determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in Article 17.
Id-deċiżjoni għandha tiġi notifikata lill-fornitur jew lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu.
The decision shall be notified to the provider or its authorised representative.
In-notifika għandha tinkludi l-konklużjonijiet tal-valutazzjoni tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità u d-deċiżjoni motivata tal-valutazzjoni.
The notification shall contain the conclusions of the assessment of the quality management system and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.3.
Is-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità kif approvata għandha tibqa' tiġi implimentata u mantnuta mill-fornitur biex tibqa' adegwata u effiċjenti.
3.3.
The quality management system as approved shall continue to be implemented and maintained by the provider so that it remains adequate and efficient.
3.4.
Kwalunkwe bidla maħsuba fis-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità approvata jew fil-lista tas-sistemi tal-IA koperti minn din tal-aħħar għandha titressaq għall-attenzjoni tal-korp notifikat mill-fornitur.
3.4.
Any intended change to the approved quality management system or the list of AI systems covered by the latter shall be brought to the attention of the notified body by the provider.
Il-korp notifikat għandu jeżamina l-bidliet proposti u għandu jiddeċiedi jekk is-sistema modifikata ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità għadhiex tissodisfa r-rekwiżiti msemmija fil-punt 3.2 jew jekk hix meħtieġa valutazzjoni mill-ġdid.
The proposed changes shall be examined by the notified body, which shall decide whether the modified quality management system continues to satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether a reassessment is necessary.
Il-korp notifikat għandu jinnotifika lill-fornitur bid-deċiżjoni tiegħu. In-notifika għandha tinkludi l-konklużjonijiet tal-eżami tal-bidliet u d-deċiżjoni motivata tal-valutazzjoni.
The notified body shall notify the provider of its decision. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination of the changes and the reasoned assessment decision.
4. Kontroll tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika.
4. Control of the technical documentation.
4.1.
Minbarra l-applikazzjoni msemmija fil-punt 3, il-fornitur għandu jippreżenta applikazzjoni ma' korp notifikat tal-għażla tiegħu għall-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika relatata mas-sistema tal-IA li l-fornitur ikun beħsiebu jintroduċi fis-suq jew iqiegħed fis-servizz u li tkun koperta mis-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità msemmija fil-punt 3.
4.1.
In addition to the application referred to in point 3, an application with a notified body of their choice shall be lodged by the provider for the assessment of the technical documentation relating to the AI system which the provider intends to place on the market or put into service and which is covered by the quality management system referred to under point 3.
4.2.
L-applikazzjoni għandha tinkludi:
4.2.
The application shall include:
(a)
l-isem u l-indirizz tal-fornitur;
(a)
the name and address of the provider;
(b)
dikjarazzjoni bil-miktub li l-istess applikazzjoni ma ġiet ippreżentata lil ebda korp notifikat ieħor;
(b)
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body;
(c)
id-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Anness IV.
(c)
the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV.
4.3.
Id-dokumentazzjoni teknika għandha tiġi eżaminata mill-korp notifikat. Fejn rilevanti, u limitat għal dak li huwa meħtieġ biex iwettqu l-kompiti tiegħu, il-korp notifikat għandu jingħata aċċess sħiħ għas-settijiet tad-data għat-taħriġ, il-validazzjoni, u l-ittestjar użati, inkluż, fejn xieraq u soġġett għal salvagwardji tas-sigurtà, permezz API jew mezzi u għodod tekniċi oħra rilevanti li jippermettu aċċess remot.
4.3.
The technical documentation shall be examined by the notified body. Where relevant, and limited to what is necessary to fulfil its tasks, the notified body shall be granted full access to the training, validation, and testing data sets used, including, where appropriate and subject to security safeguards, through API or other relevant technical means and tools enabling remote access.
4.4.
Meta jeżamina d-dokumentazzjoni teknika, il-korp notifikat jista' jirrikjedi li l-fornitur jipprovdi evidenza ulterjuri jew li jwettaq aktar testijiet biex tkun tista' ssir valutazzjoni xierqa tal-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2. Meta l-korp notifikat ma jkunx sodisfatt bit-testijiet imwettqa mill-fornitur, il-korp notifikat għandu jwettaq direttament hu stess testijiet adegwati, kif xieraq.
4.4.
In examining the technical documentation, the notified body may require that the provider supply further evidence or carry out further tests so as to enable a proper assessment of the conformity of the AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2. Where the notified body is not satisfied with the tests carried out by the provider, the notified body shall itself directly carry out adequate tests, as appropriate.
4.5.
Meta meħtieġ biex tiġi vvalutata l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA b'riskju għoli mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, wara li l-mezzi l-oħrajn kollha raġonevoli biex tiġi vverifikata l-konformità jkunu ġew eżawriti u ntwerew li mhumiex suffiċjenti, u fuq talba motivata, il-korp notifikat għandu jingħata wkoll aċċess għall-mudelli għat-taħriġ u dawk imħarrġin tas-sistema tal-IA, inkluż il-parametri rilevanti tagħha. Dan l-aċċess għandu jkun soġġett għal-liġi eżistenti tal-Unjoni dwar il-protezzjoni tal-proprjetà intellettwali u s-sigrieti kummerċjali.
4.5.
Where necessary to assess the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, after all other reasonable means to verify conformity have been exhausted and have proven to be insufficient, and upon a reasoned request, the notified body shall also be granted access to the training and trained models of the AI system, including its relevant parameters. Such access shall be subject to existing Union law on the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets.
4.6.
Id-deċiżjoni tal-korp notifikat għandha tiġi notifikata lill-fornitur jew lir-rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu. In-notifika għandha tinkludi l-konklużjonijiet tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika u d-deċiżjoni motivata tal-valutazzjoni.
4.6.
The decision of the notified body shall be notified to the provider or its authorised representative. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the assessment of the technical documentation and the reasoned assessment decision.
Meta s-sistema tal-IA tkun konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, il-korp notifikat għandu joħroġ ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni. Iċ-ċertifikat għandu jindika l-isem u l-indirizz tal-fornitur, il-konklużjonijiet tal-eżami, il-kundizzjonijiet (jekk hemm) għall-validità tiegħu u d-data meħtieġa għall-identifikazzjoni tas-sistema tal-IA.
Where the AI system is in conformity with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, the notified body shall issue a Union technical documentation assessment certificate. The certificate shall indicate the name and address of the provider, the conclusions of the examination, the conditions (if any) for its validity and the data necessary for the identification of the AI system.
Iċ-ċertifikat u l-annessi tiegħu għandu jkun fihom l-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha biex tkun tista' tiġi evalwata l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA, u biex ikun jista' jsir kontroll tas-sistema tal-IA waqt l-użu, meta applikabbli.
The certificate and its annexes shall contain all relevant information to allow the conformity of the AI system to be evaluated, and to allow for control of the AI system while in use, where applicable.
Meta s-sistema tal-IA ma tkunx konformi mar-rekwiżiti stipulati fil-Kapitolu III, it-Taqsima 2, il-korp notifikat għandu jirrifjuta li joħroġ ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni u għandu jinforma lill-applikant dwar dan, u jagħti raġunijiet dettaljati għar-rifjut tiegħu.
Where the AI system is not in conformity with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, the notified body shall refuse to issue a Union technical documentation assessment certificate and shall inform the applicant accordingly, giving detailed reasons for its refusal.
Meta s-sistema tal-IA ma tkunx tissodisfa r-rekwiżit relatat mad-data użata għat-taħriġ tagħha, qabel l-applikazzjoni għal valutazzjoni ġdida tal-konformità jeħtieġ li s-sistema tal-IA titħarreġ mill-ġdid. F'dan il-każ, id-deċiżjoni motivata ta' valutazzjoni tal-korp notifikat li jirrifjuta l-ħruġ taċ-ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni għandha tinkludi kunsiderazzjonijiet speċifiċi dwar id-data ta' kwalità użata biex titħarreġ is-sistema tal-IA, b'mod partikolari dwar ir-raġunijiet għan-nonkonformità.
Where the AI system does not meet the requirement relating to the data used to train it, re-training of the AI system will be needed prior to the application for a new conformity assessment. In this case, the reasoned assessment decision of the notified body refusing to issue the Union technical documentation assessment certificate shall contain specific considerations on the quality data used to train the AI system, in particular on the reasons for non-compliance.
4.7.
Kwalunkwe bidla fis-sistema tal-IA li tista' taffettwa l-konformità tas-sistema tal-IA mar-rekwiżiti jew l-għan maħsub tagħha għandha tiġi vvalutata mill-korp notifikat li ħareġ iċ-ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni. Il-fornitur għandu jinforma lil dan il-korp notifikat bl-intenzjoni tiegħu li jintroduċi kwalunkwe waħda mill-bidliet imsemmija hawn fuq, jew jekk isir jaf b'xi mod ieħor bl-okkorrenza ta' dawn il-bidliet. Il-korp notifikat għandu jivvaluta l-bidliet maħsuba u għandu jiddeċiedi jekk dawk il-bidliet jirrikjedux valutazzjoni ġdida tal-konformità f'konformità mal-Artikolu 43(4) jew jekk jistgħux jiġu indirizzati permezz ta' suppliment maċ-ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni. Fil-każ tal-aħħar, il-korp notifikat għandu jivvaluta l-bidliet, jinnotifika lill-fornitur bid-deċiżjoni tiegħu u, meta l-bidliet jiġu approvati, joħroġ suppliment għaċ-ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni lill-fornitur.
4.7.
Any change to the AI system that could affect the compliance of the AI system with the requirements or its intended purpose shall be assessed by the notified body which issued the Union technical documentation assessment certificate. The provider shall inform such notified body of its intention to introduce any of the abovementioned changes, or if it otherwise becomes aware of the occurrence of such changes. The intended changes shall be assessed by the notified body, which shall decide whether those changes require a new conformity assessment in accordance with Article 43(4) or whether they could be addressed by means of a supplement to the Union technical documentation assessment certificate. In the latter case, the notified body shall assess the changes, notify the provider of its decision and, where the changes are approved, issue to the provider a supplement to the Union technical documentation assessment certificate.
5. Sorveljanza tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità approvata.
5. Surveillance of the approved quality management system.
5.1.
L-għan tas-sorveljanza mwettqa mill-korp notifikat imsemmi fil-punt 3 huwa li jiġi żgurat li l-fornitur jikkonforma kif xieraq mat-termini u l-kundizzjonijiet tas-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità approvata.
5.1.
The purpose of the surveillance carried out by the notified body referred to in Point 3 is to make sure that the provider duly complies with the terms and conditions of the approved quality management system.
5.2.
Għall-finijiet tal-valutazzjoni, il-fornitur għandu jħalli lill-korp notifikat jaċċessa l-istabbiliment fejn ikun qed isir it-tfassil, l-iżvilupp jew l-ittestjar tas-sistemi tal-IA. Barra minn hekk, il-fornitur għandu jikkondividi mal-korp notifikat l-informazzjoni kollha neċessarja.
5.2.
For assessment purposes, the provider shall allow the notified body to access the premises where the design, development, testing of the AI systems is taking place. The provider shall further share with the notified body all necessary information.
5.3.
Il-korp notifikat għandu jwettaq verifiki perjodiċi biex jiżgura li l-fornitur iżomm u japplika s-sistema ta' ġestjoni tal-kwalità u għandu jipprovdi rapport ta' awditu lill-fornitur. Fil-kuntest ta' dawk l-awditi, il-korp notifikat jista' jwettaq testijiet addizzjonali tas-sistemi tal-IA li għalihom ikun inħareġ ċertifikat tal-valutazzjoni tad-dokumentazzjoni teknika tal-Unjoni.
5.3.
The notified body shall carry out periodic audits to make sure that the provider maintains and applies the quality management system and shall provide the provider with an audit report. In the context of those audits, the notified body may carry out additional tests of the AI systems for which a Union technical documentation assessment certificate was issued.
ANNESS VIII
ANNEX VIII
Informazzjoni li trid tiġi ppreżentata mar-reġistrazzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49
Information to be submitted upon the registration of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49
Taqsima A – Informazzjoni li trid tiġi ppreżentata mill-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(1)
Section A — Information to be submitted by providers of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49(1)
L-informazzjoni li ġejja għandha tingħata u mbagħad tinżamm aġġornata fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jridu jiġu rreġistrati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(1):
The following information shall be provided and thereafter kept up to date with regard to high-risk AI systems to be registered in accordance with Article 49(1):
1.
L-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur;
1.
The name, address and contact details of the provider;
2.
Meta l-informazzjoni tiġi ppreżentata minn persuna oħra f'isem il-fornitur, l-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt ta' dik il-persuna;
2.
Where submission of information is carried out by another person on behalf of the provider, the name, address and contact details of that person;
3.
L-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tar-rappreżentant awtorizzat, fejn applikabbli;
3.
The name, address and contact details of the authorised representative, where applicable;
4.
L-isem kummerċjali tas-sistema tal-IA u kwalunkwe referenza mhux ambigwa addizzjonali li tippermetti l-identifikazzjoni u t-traċċabbiltà tas-sistema tal-IA;
4.
The AI system trade name and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;
5.
Deskrizzjoni tal-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA u tal-komponenti u l-funzjonijiet appoġġati permezz ta' din is-sistema tal-IA;
5.
A description of the intended purpose of the AI system and of the components and functions supported through this AI system;
6.
Deskrizzjoni bażika u konċiża tal-informazzjoni użata mis-sistema (data, inputs) u l-loġika operattiva tagħha;
6.
A basic and concise description of the information used by the system (data, inputs) and its operating logic;
7.
L-istatus tas-sistema tal-IA (fis-suq, jew fis-servizz; m'għadhiex fis-suq/fis-servizz, imsejħa lura);
7.
The status of the AI system (on the market, or in service; no longer placed on the market/in service, recalled);
8.
It-tip, in-numru u l-iskadenza taċ-ċertifikat maħruġ mill-korp notifikat u l-isem jew in-numru ta' identifikazzjoni ta' dak il-korp notifikat, fejn applikabbli;
8.
The type, number and expiry date of the certificate issued by the notified body and the name or identification number of that notified body, where applicable;
9.
Kopja skenjata taċ-ċertifikat imsemmi fil-punt 8, fejn applikabbli;
9.
A scanned copy of the certificate referred to in point 8, where applicable;
10.
Kwalunkwe Stat Membru fejn is-sistema tal-IA ġiet introdotta fis-suq, tqiegħdet fis-servizz jew saret disponibbli fl-Unjoni;
10.
Any Member States in which the AI system has been placed on the market, put into service or made available in the Union;
11.
Kopja tad-dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità tal-UE msemmija fl-Artikolu 47;
11.
A copy of the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47;
12.
Struzzjonijiet elettroniċi għall-użu; din l-informazzjoni ma għandhiex tingħata għas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jintużaw fl-oqsma tal-infurzar tal-liġi jew tal-ġestjoni tal-migrazzjoni, l-ażil u l-kontroll fuq il-fruntieri msemmija fl-Anness III, il-punti 1, 6 u 7;
12.
Electronic instructions for use; this information shall not be provided for high-risk AI systems in the areas of law enforcement or migration, asylum and border control management referred to in Annex III, points 1, 6 and 7;
13.
URL għal informazzjoni addizzjonali (fakultattiv).
13.
A URL for additional information (optional).
Taqsima B – Informazzjoni li trid tiġi ppreżentata mill-fornituri ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(2)
Section B — Information to be submitted by providers of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49(2)
L-informazzjoni li ġejja għandha tingħata u mbagħad tinżamm aġġornata fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA li jridu jiġu rreġistrati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(2):
The following information shall be provided and thereafter kept up to date with regard to AI systems to be registered in accordance with Article 49(2):
1.
L-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur;
1.
The name, address and contact details of the provider;
2.
Meta l-informazzjoni tiġi ppreżentata minn persuna oħra f'isem il-fornitur, l-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt ta' dik il-persuna;
2.
Where submission of information is carried out by another person on behalf of the provider, the name, address and contact details of that person;
3.
L-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tar-rappreżentant awtorizzat, fejn applikabbli;
3.
The name, address and contact details of the authorised representative, where applicable;
4.
L-isem kummerċjali tas-sistema tal-IA u kwalunkwe referenza mhux ambigwa addizzjonali li tippermetti l-identifikazzjoni u t-traċċabbiltà tas-sistema tal-IA;
4.
The AI system trade name and any additional unambiguous reference allowing the identification and traceability of the AI system;
5.
Deskrizzjoni tal-għan maħsub tas-sistema tal-IA;
5.
A description of the intended purpose of the AI system;
6.
Il-kundizzjoni jew il-kundizzjonijiet skont l-Artikolu 6(3) li abbażi tagħhom is-sistema tal-IA titqies li mhijiex ta' riskju għoli;
6.
The condition or conditions under Article 6(3)based on which the AI system is considered to be not-high-risk;
7.
Sommarju qasir tar-raġunijiet li abbażi tagħhom is-sistema tal-IA titqies li mhijiex ta' riskju għoli fl-applikazzjoni tal-proċedura skont l-Artikolu 6(3);
7.
A short summary of the grounds on which the AI system is considered to be not-high-risk in application of the procedure under Article 6(3);
8.
L-istatus tas-sistema tal-IA (fis-suq, jew fis-servizz; m'għadhiex fis-suq/fis-servizz, imsejħa lura);
8.
The status of the AI system (on the market, or in service; no longer placed on the market/in service, recalled);
9.
Kwalunkwe Stat Membru li fih is-sistema tal-IA ġiet introdotta fis-suq, tqiegħdet fis-servizz jew saret disponibbli fl-Unjoni.
9.
Any Member States in which the AI system has been placed on the market, put into service or made available in the Union.
Taqsima C – Informazzjoni li trid tiġi ppreżentata mill-implimentaturi ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(3)
Section C — Information to be submitted by deployers of high-risk AI systems in accordance with Article 49(3)
L-informazzjoni li ġejja għandha tingħata u mbagħad tinżamm aġġornata fir-rigward tas-sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli li jridu jiġu rreġistrati f'konformità mal-Artikolu 49(3):
The following information shall be provided and thereafter kept up to date with regard to high-risk AI systems to be registered in accordance with Article 49(3):
1.
L-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-implimentatur;
1.
The name, address and contact details of the deployer;
2.
L-isem, l-indirizz u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-persuna li tippreżenta l-informazzjoni f'isem l-implimentatur;
2.
The name, address and contact details of the person submitting information on behalf of the deployer;
3.
Il-URL tad-dħul tas-sistema tal-IA fil-bażi tad-data tal-UE mill-fornitur tagħha;
3.
The URL of the entry of the AI system in the EU database by its provider;
4.
Sommarju tas-sejbiet tal-valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq id-drittijiet fundamentali mwettqa f'konformità mal-Artikolu 27;
4.
A summary of the findings of the fundamental rights impact assessment conducted in accordance with Article 27;
5.
Sommarju tal-valutazzjoni tal-impatt fuq il-protezzjoni tad-data mwettqa f'konformità mal-Artikolu 35 tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 jew mal-Artikolu 27 tad-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680 kif speċifikat fl-Artikolu 26(8) ta' dan ir-Regolament, fejn applikabbli.
5.
A summary of the data protection impact assessment carried out in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2016/680 as specified in Article 26(8) of this Regulation, where applicable.
ANNESS IX
ANNEX IX
Informazzjoni li trid tiġi ppreżentata mar-reġistrazzjoni ta' sistemi tal-IA b'riskju għoli elenkati fl-Anness III fir-rigward tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali f'konformità mal-Artikolu 60
Information to be submitted upon the registration of high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III in relation to testing in real world conditions in accordance with Article 60
L-informazzjoni li ġejja għandha tingħata u mbagħad tinżamm aġġornata fir-rigward tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali li jrid jiġi rreġistrat f'konformità mal-Artikolu 60:
The following information shall be provided and thereafter kept up to date with regard to testing in real world conditions to be registered in accordance with Article 60:
1.
Numru uniku ta' identifikazzjoni waħdieni għall-Unjoni kollha tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
1.
A Union-wide unique single identification number of the testing in real world conditions;
2.
L-isem u d-dettalji ta' kuntatt tal-fornitur jew tal-fornitur prospettiv u tal-implimentaturi involuti fl-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
2.
The name and contact details of the provider or prospective provider and of the deployers involved in the testing in real world conditions;
3.
Deskrizzjoni qasira tas-sistema tal-IA, l-għan maħsub tagħha u informazzjoni oħra meħtieġa għall-identifikazzjoni tas-sistema;
3.
A brief description of the AI system, its intended purpose, and other information necessary for the identification of the system;
4.
Sommarju tal-karatteristiċi ewlenin tal-pjan għall-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali;
4.
A summary of the main characteristics of the plan for testing in real world conditions;
5.
Informazzjoni dwar is-sospensjoni jew it-terminazzjoni tal-ittestjar fil-kundizzjonijiet tad-dinja reali.
5.
Information on the suspension or termination of the testing in real world conditions.
ANNESS X
ANNEX X
Atti leġiżlattivi tal-Unjoni dwar sistemi tal-IT fuq skala kbira fl-oqsma tal-Libertà, is-Sigurtà u l-Ġustizzja
Union legislative acts on large-scale IT systems in the area of Freedom, Security and Justice
1. Is-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni ta' Schengen
1. Schengen Information System
(a)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1860 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-28 ta' Novembru 2018 dwar l-użu tas-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni ta' Schengen għar-ritorn ta' ċittadini ta' pajjiżi terzi b'soġġorn illegali (ĠU L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 1).
(a)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1860 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 1).
(b)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1861 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-28 ta' Novembru 2018 dwar l-istabbiliment, it-tħaddim u l-użu tas-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni ta' Schengen (SIS) fil-qasam tal-verifiki fuq il-fruntieri, u li jemenda l-Konvenzjoni li timplimenta l-Ftehim ta' Schengen, u li jemenda u jħassar ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 1987/2006 (ĠU L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 14).
(b)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border checks, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, and amending and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 (OJ L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 14).
(c)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1862 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-28 ta' Novembru 2018 dwar l-istabbiliment, it-tħaddim u l-użu tas-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni ta' Schengen (SIS) fil-qasam tal-kooperazzjoni tal-pulizija u l-kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja f'materji kriminali, li jemenda u jħassar id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 2007/533/ĠIA u jħassar ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 1986/2006 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u d-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2010/261/UE (ĠU L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 56).
(c)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU (OJ L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 56).
2. Is-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni dwar il-Viża
2. Visa Information System
(a)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2021/1133 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-7 ta' Lulju 2021 li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) Nru 603/2013, (UE) 2016/794, (UE) 2018/1862, (UE) 2019/816 u (UE) 2019/818 fir-rigward tal-istabbiliment tal-kundizzjonijiet għall-aċċess għal sistemi oħra ta' informazzjoni tal-UE għall-finijiet tas-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni dwar il-Viża (ĠU L 248, 13.7.2021, p. 1).
(a)
Regulation (EU) 2021/1133 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 amending Regulations (EU) No 603/2013, (EU) 2016/794, (EU) 2018/1862, (EU) 2019/816 and (EU) 2019/818 as regards the establishment of the conditions for accessing other EU information systems for the purposes of the Visa Information System (OJ L 248, 13.7.2021, p. 1).
(b)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2021/1134 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-7 ta' Lulju 2021 li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 767/2008, (KE) Nru 810/2009, (UE) 2016/399, (UE) 2017/2226, (UE) 2018/1240, (UE) 2018/1860, (UE) 2018/1861, (UE) 2019/817 u (UE) 2019/1896 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u li jħassar id-Deċiżjonijiet tal-Kunsill 2004/512/KE u 2008/633/ĠAI, għall-fini tar-riforma tas-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni dwar il-Viża (ĠU L 248, 13.7.2021, p. 11).
(b)
Regulation (EU) 2021/1134 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EC) No 810/2009, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1860, (EU) 2018/1861, (EU) 2019/817 and (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, for the purpose of reforming the Visa Information System (OJ L 248, 13.7.2021, p. 11).
3. Il-Eurodac
3. Eurodac
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2024/1358 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-14 ta’ Mejju 2024 dwar l-istabbiliment tal-“Eurodac” għat-tqabbil ta' data bijometrika sabiex jiġu applikati b’mod effettiv ir-Regolamenti (UE) 2024/1315 u (UE) 2024/1350 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u tad-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 2001/55/KE u għall-identifikazzjoni ta' ċittadin ta' pajjiż terz jew persuna apolida b'soġġorn illegali u dwar talbiet għat-tqabbil ma' data tal-Eurodac mill-awtoritajiet tal-infurzar tal-liġi tal-Istati Membri u mill-Europol għall-finijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi, u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) 2018/1240 u (UE) 2019/818 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u jħassar ir-Regolament (UE) Nru 603/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill (ĠU L, 2024/1358, 22.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1358/oj).
Regulation (EU) 2024/1358 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of biometric data in order to effectively apply Regulations (EU) 2024/1315 and (EU) 2024/1350 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 2001/55/EC and to identify illegally staying third-country nationals and stateless persons and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1240 and (EU) 2019/818 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L, 2024/1358, 22.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1358/oj).
4. Is-Sistema ta' Dħul/Ħruġ
4. Entry/Exit System
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2017/2226 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-30 ta' Novembru 2017 li jistabbilixxi Sistema ta' Dħul/Ħruġ (EES) biex tiġi rreġistrata data dwar id-dħul u l-ħruġ u data dwar iċ-ċaħda tad-dħul ta' ċittadini ta' pajjiżi terzi li jaqsmu l-fruntieri esterni tal-Istati Membri u li jiddetermina l-kundizzjonijiet għall-aċċess għall-EES għal raġunijiet ta' infurzar tal-liġi, u li jemenda l-Konvenzjoni li timplimenta l-Ftehim ta' Schengen u r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 767/2008 u (UE) Nru 1077/2011 (ĠU L 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20).
Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011 (OJ L 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20).
5. Is-Sistema Ewropea ta' Informazzjoni u ta' Awtorizzazzjoni għall-Ivvjaġġar
5. European Travel Information and Authorisation System
(a)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1240 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-12 ta' Settembru 2018 li jistabbilixxi Sistema Ewropea ta' Informazzjoni u ta' Awtorizzazzjoni għall-Ivvjaġġar (ETIAS) u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) Nru 1077/2011, (UE) Nru 515/2014, (UE) 2016/399, (UE) 2016/1624 u (UE) 2017/2226 (ĠU L 236, 19.9.2018, p. 1).
(a)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 September 2018 establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) and amending Regulations (EU) No 1077/2011, (EU) No 515/2014, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2016/1624 and (EU) 2017/2226 (OJ L 236, 19.9.2018, p. 1).
(b)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2018/1241 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tat-12 ta' Settembru 2018 li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) 2016/794 bl-għan li tiġi stabbilita Sistema Ewropea ta' Informazzjoni u ta' Awtorizzazzjoni għall-Ivvjaġġar (ETIAS) (ĠU L 236, 19.9.2018, p. 72).
(b)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 September 2018 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/794 for the purpose of establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) (OJ L 236, 19.9.2018, p. 72).
6. Is-Sistema Ewropea ta' Informazzjoni ta' Rekords Kriminali għal ċittadini ta' pajjiżi terzi u persuni mingħajr Stat
6. European Criminal Records Information System on third-country nationals and stateless persons
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/816 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta' April 2019 li jistabbilixxi sistema ċentralizzata għall-identifikazzjoni ta' Stati Membri fil-pussess ta' informazzjoni dwar kundanni ta' ċittadini ta' pajjiżi terzi u persuni apolidi (ECRIS-TCN) biex tissupplimenta s-Sistema Ewropea ta' Informazzjoni ta' Rekords Kriminali u li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) 2018/1726 (ĠU L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 1).
Regulation (EU) 2019/816 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 establishing a centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third-country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN) to supplement the European Criminal Records Information System and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 (OJ L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 1).
7. Interoperabbiltà
7. Interoperability
(a)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/817 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-20 ta' Mejju 2019 dwar l-istabbiliment ta' qafas għall-interoperabbiltà bejn sistemi ta' informazzjoni tal-UE fil-qasam ta' fruntieri u viża u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (KE) Nru 767/2008, (UE) 2016/399, (UE) 2017/2226, (UE) 2018/1240, (UE) 2018/1726 u (UE) 2018/1861 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill u d- Deċiżjonijiet tal-Kunsill 2004/512/KE u 2008/633/ĠAI (ĠU L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 27).
(a)
Regulation (EU) 2019/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems in the field of borders and visa and amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1726 and (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA (OJ L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 27).
(b)
Ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/818 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-20 ta' Mejju 2019 dwar l-istabbiliment ta' qafas għall-interoperabbiltà bejn sistemi ta' informazzjoni tal-UE fil-qasam tal-kooperazzjoni tal-pulizija u ġudizzjarja, l-ażil u l-migrazzjoni u li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) 2018/1726, (UE) 2018/1862 u (UE) 2019/816 (ĠU L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 85).
(b)
Regulation (EU) 2019/818 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems in the field of police and judicial cooperation, asylum and migration and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1726, (EU) 2018/1862 and (EU) 2019/816 (OJ L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 85).
ANNESS XI
ANNEX XI
Dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 53(1), il-punt (a) – dokumentazzjoni teknika għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Technical documentation referred to in Article 53(1), point (a) — technical documentation for providers of general-purpose AI models
Taqsima 1
Section 1
Informazzjoni li trid tiġi pprovduta mill-fornituri kollha ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali
Information to be provided by all providers of general-purpose AI models
Id-dokumentazzjoni teknika msemmija fl-Artikolu 53(1), il-punt (a) għandu jkun fiha mill-inqas l-informazzjoni li ġejja, kif xieraq għad-daqs u għall-profil tar-riskju tal-mudell:
The technical documentation referred to in Article 53(1), point (a) shall contain at least the following information as appropriate to the size and risk profile of the model:
1.
Deskrizzjoni ġenerali tas-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li tinkludi:
1.
A general description of the general-purpose AI model including:
(a)
il-kompiti li l-mudell ikun maħsub li jwettaq u t-tip u n-natura tas-sistemi tal-IA li fihom jista' jiġi integrat;
(a)
the tasks that the model is intended to perform and the type and nature of AI systems in which it can be integrated;
(b)
il-politiki ta' użu aċċettabbli applikabbli;
(b)
the acceptable use policies applicable;
(c)
id-data tar-rilaxx u l-metodi tad-distribuzzjoni;
(c)
the date of release and methods of distribution;
(d)
l-arkitettura u n-numru ta' parametri;
(d)
the architecture and number of parameters;
(e)
il-modalità (eż. test, immaġni) u l-format tal-inputs u l-outputs;
(e)
the modality (e.g. text, image) and format of inputs and outputs;
(f)
il-liċenzja.
(f)
the licence.
2.
Deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-elementi tal-mudell imsemmija fil-punt 1, u informazzjoni rilevanti tal-proċess għall-iżvilupp, li tinkludi l-elementi li ġejjin:
2.
A detailed description of the elements of the model referred to in point 1, and relevant information of the process for the development, including the following elements:
(a)
il-mezzi tekniċi (eż. struzzjonijiet tal-użu, infrastruttura, għodod) meħtieġa biex il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jiġi integrat fis-sistemi tal-IA;
(a)
the technical means (e.g. instructions of use, infrastructure, tools) required for the general-purpose AI model to be integrated in AI systems;
(b)
l-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tad-disinn tal-mudell u l-proċess ta' taħriġ, inkluż il-metodoloġiji u t-tekniki ta' taħriġ, l-għażliet ewlenin tad-disinn inkluż ir-raġunamenti u s-suppożizzjonijiet li jkunu saru; dak li l-mudell tfassal biex jottimizza u r-rilevanza tal-parametri differenti; kif applikabbli;
(b)
the design specifications of the model and training process, including training methodologies and techniques, the key design choices including the rationale and assumptions made; what the model is designed to optimise for and the relevance of the different parameters, as applicable;
(c)
informazzjoni dwar id-data użata għat-taħriġ, l-ittestjar u l-validazzjoni, fejn applikabbli, inkluż it-tip u l-provenjenza tad-data u l-metodoloġiji tal-manutenzjoni (eż. tindif, filtrazzjoni eċċ.), in-numru ta' punti tad-data, l-ambitu u l-karatteristiċi ewlenin tagħhom; kif inkisbet u ntgħażlet id-data kif ukoll il-miżuri l-oħra kollha biex jiġi identifikat in-nuqqas ta' adegwatezza tas-sorsi tad-data u l-metodi biex jiġu identifikati preġudizzji identifikabbli, fejn applikabbli;
(c)
information on the data used for training, testing and validation, where applicable, including the type and provenance of data and curation methodologies (e.g. cleaning, filtering, etc.), the number of data points, their scope and main characteristics; how the data was obtained and selected as well as all other measures to detect the unsuitability of data sources and methods to detect identifiable biases, where applicable;
(d)
ir-riżorsi komputazzjonali użati biex jitħarreġ il-mudell (eż. in-numru ta' operazzjonijiet b'punt varjabbli), il-ħin tat-taħriġ, u dettalji rilevanti oħra relatati mat-taħriġ;
(d)
the computational resources used to train the model (e.g. number of floating point operations), training time, and other relevant details related to the training;
(e)
il-konsum tal-enerġija magħruf jew stmat tal-mudell.
(e)
known or estimated energy consumption of the model.
Fir-rigward tal-punt (e), meta l-konsum tal-enerġija tal-mudell ma jkunx magħruf, il-konsum tal-enerġija jista' jkun ibbażat fuq informazzjoni dwar ir-riżorsi komputazzjonali użati.
With regard to point (e), where the energy consumption of the model is unknown, the energy consumption may be based on information about computational resources used.
Taqsima 2
Section 2
Informazzjoni addizzjonali li trid tiġi pprovduta mill-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku
Additional information to be provided by providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
1.
Deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-istrateġiji ta' evalwazzjoni, inkluż ir-riżultati tal-evalwazzjoni, abbażi tal-protokolli u l-għodod ta' evalwazzjoni pubblika disponibbli jew inkella abbażi ta' metodoloġiji oħra ta' evalwazzjoni. L-istrateġiji ta' evalwazzjoni għandhom jinkludu l-kriterji ta' evalwazzjoni, il-metrika u l-metodoloġija dwar l-identifikazzjoni tal-limitazzjonijiet.
1.
A detailed description of the evaluation strategies, including evaluation results, on the basis of available public evaluation protocols and tools or otherwise of other evaluation methodologies. Evaluation strategies shall include evaluation criteria, metrics and the methodology on the identification of limitations.
2.
Fejn applikabbli, deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-miżuri stabbiliti għall-fini tat-twettiq tal-ittestjar kontradittorju intern u/jew estern (eż. red teaming), l-adattamenti għall-mudell, inkluż l-allinjament u l-irfinar.
2.
Where applicable, a detailed description of the measures put in place for the purpose of conducting internal and/or external adversarial testing (e.g. red teaming), model adaptations, including alignment and fine-tuning.
3.
Fejn applikabbli, deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-arkitettura tas-sistema li tispjega kif il-komponenti tas-software jibnu fuq jew jikkontribwixxu għal xulxin u jintegraw fl-ipproċessar ġenerali.
3.
Where applicable, a detailed description of the system architecture explaining how software components build or feed into each other and integrate into the overall processing.
ANNESS XII
ANNEX XII
Informazzjoni dwar it-trasparenza msemmija fl-Artikolu 53(1), il-punt (b) – dokumentazzjoni teknika għall-fornituri ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali lil fornituri downstream li jintegraw il-mudell fis-sistema tal-IA tagħhom
Transparency information referred to in Article 53(1), point (b) — technical documentation for providers of general-purpose AI models to downstream providers that integrate the model into their AI system
L-informazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 53(1), il-punt (b) għandu jkun fiha mill-inqas dan li ġej:
The information referred to in Article 53(1), point (b) shall contain at least the following:
1.
Deskrizzjoni ġenerali tas-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali li tinkludi:
1.
A general description of the general-purpose AI model including:
(a)
il-kompiti li l-mudell ikun maħsub li jwettaq u t-tip u n-natura tas-sistemi tal-IA li fihom jista' jiġi integrat;
(a)
the tasks that the model is intended to perform and the type and nature of AI systems into which it can be integrated;
(b)
il-politiki ta' użu aċċettabbli applikabbli;
(b)
the acceptable use policies applicable;
(c)
id-data tar-rilaxx u l-metodi tad-distribuzzjoni;
(c)
the date of release and methods of distribution;
(d)
kif il-mudell jinteraġixxi, jew jista' jintuża biex jinteraġixxi, ma' hardware jew software li mhux parti mill-mudell innifsu, fejn applikabbli;
(d)
how the model interacts, or can be used to interact, with hardware or software that is not part of the model itself, where applicable;
(e)
il-verżjonijiet tas-software rilevanti relatati mal-użu tal-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali, fejn applikabbli;
(e)
the versions of relevant software related to the use of the general-purpose AI model, where applicable;
(f)
l-arkitettura u n-numru ta' parametri;
(f)
the architecture and number of parameters;
(g)
il-modalità (eż. test, immaġni) u l-format tal-inputs u l-outputs;
(g)
the modality (e.g. text, image) and format of inputs and outputs;
(h)
il-liċenzja għall-mudell.
(h)
the licence for the model.
2.
Deskrizzjoni dettaljata tal-elementi tal-mudell u tal-proċess għall-iżvilupp tiegħu, inkluż:
2.
A description of the elements of the model and of the process for its development, including:
(a)
il-mezzi tekniċi (eż. struzzjonijiet għall-użu, infrastruttura, għodod) meħtieġa biex il-mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jiġi integrat fis-sistemi tal-IA;
(a)
the technical means (e.g. instructions for use, infrastructure, tools) required for the general-purpose AI model to be integrated into AI systems;
(b)
il-modalità (eż. test, immaġni, eċċ.) u l-format tal-inputs u l-outputs u d-daqs massimu tagħhom (eż. context window length, eċċ.);
(b)
the modality (e.g. text, image, etc.) and format of the inputs and outputs and their maximum size (e.g. context window length, etc.);
(c)
informazzjoni dwar id-data użata għat-taħriġ, l-ittestjar u l-validazzjoni, fejn applikabbli, inkluż it-tip u l-provenjenza tad-data u l-metodoloġiji tal-manutenzjoni.
(c)
information on the data used for training, testing and validation, where applicable, including the type and provenance of data and curation methodologies.
ANNESS XIII
ANNEX XIII
Kriterji għad-deżinjazzjoni ta' mudelli tal-IA bi skop ġenerali b'riskju sistemiku msemmija fl-Artikolu 51
Criteria for the designation of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk referred to in Article 51
Bl-għan li jiġi ddeterminat li mudell tal-IA bi skop ġenerali jkollu kapaċitajiet jew impatt ekwivalenti għal dawk stipulati fl-Artikolu 51(1), il-punt (a), il-Kummissjoni għandha tqis il-kriterji li ġejjin:
For the purpose of determining that a general-purpose AI model has capabilities or an impact equivalent to those set out in Article 51(1), point (a), the Commission shall take into account the following criteria:
(a)
in-numru ta' parametri tal-mudell;
(a)
the number of parameters of the model;
(b)
il-kwalità jew id-daqs tas-sett tad-data, pereżempju mkejla permezz ta' tokens;
(b)
the quality or size of the data set, for example measured through tokens;
(c)
l-ammont ta' komputazzjoni użata biex jitħarreġ il-mudell, imkejjel f'operazzjonijiet b'punt varjabbli jew indikat b'taħlita ta' varjabbli oħra bħall-kost stmat tat-taħriġ, il-ħin stmat meħtieġ għat-taħriġ, jew il-konsum tal-enerġija stmat għat-taħriġ;
(c)
the amount of computation used for training the model, measured in floating point operations or indicated by a combination of other variables such as estimated cost of training, estimated time required for the training, or estimated energy consumption for the training;
(d)
il-modalitajiet tal-input u tal-output tal-mudell, bħal test għal test (mudelli lingwistiċi kbar), test għal immaġni, il-multimodalità, u l-limiti tal-ogħla livell ta' żvilupp tekniku biex jiġu ddeterminati l-kapaċitajiet b'impatt kbir għal kull modalità, u t-tip speċifiku ta' inputs u outputs (eż. sekwenzi bijoloġiċi);
(d)
the input and output modalities of the model, such as text to text (large language models), text to image, multi-modality, and the state of the art thresholds for determining high-impact capabilities for each modality, and the specific type of inputs and outputs (e.g. biological sequences);
(e)
il-parametri referenzjarji u l-evalwazzjonijiet tal-kapaċitajiet tal-mudell, inkluż billi jitqies in-numru ta' kompiti mingħajr taħriġ addizzjonali, l-adattabbiltà biex jitgħallem kompiti ġodda u distinti, il-livell ta' awtonomija u l-iskalabbiltà tiegħu, l-għodod li għandu aċċess għalihom;
(e)
the benchmarks and evaluations of capabilities of the model, including considering the number of tasks without additional training, adaptability to learn new, distinct tasks, its level of autonomy and scalability, the tools it has access to;
(f)
jekk ikollux impatt kbir fuq is-suq intern minħabba kemm jilħaq nies, li għandu jkun preżunt meta jkun sar disponibbli għal mill-inqas 10 000 utent kummerċjali rreġistrat stabbilit fl-Unjoni;
(f)
whether it has a high impact on the internal market due to its reach, which shall be presumed when it has been made available to at least 10 000 registered business users established in the Union;
(g)
in-numru ta' utenti finali rreġistrati.
(g)
the number of registered end-users.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
ISSN 1977-074X (electronic edition)
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)